Critical Appraisal Skills Among Canadian Obstetrics and Gynaecology Residents: How Do They Fare?

OBJECTIVES

Evidence-based medicine has become the standard of care in clinical practice. In this study, our objectives were to (1) determine the type of epidemiology and/or biostatistical training being given in Canadian obstetrics and gynaecology post-graduate programs, (2) determine obstetrics and gynaecology residents' level of confidence with critical appraisal, and (3) assess knowledge of fundamental biostatistical and epidemiological principles among Canadian obstetrics and gynaecology trainees.

METHODS

During a national standardized in-training examination, all Canadian obstetrics and gynaecology residents were invited to complete an anonymous cross-sectional survey to determine their levels of confidence with critical appraisal. Fifteen critical appraisal questions were integrated into the standardized examination to assess critical appraisal skills objectively. Primary outcomes were the residents' level of confidence interpreting biostatistical results and applying research findings to clinical practice, their desire for more biostatistics/epidemiological training in residency, and their performance on knowledge questions.

RESULTS

A total of 301 of 355 residents completed the survey (response rate=84.8%). Most (76.7%) had little/no confidence interpreting research statistics. Confidence was significantly higher in those with increased seniority (OR=1.93), in those who had taken a previous epidemiology/statistics course (OR=2.65), and in those who had prior publications (OR=1.82). Many (68%) had little/no confidence applying research findings to clinical practice. Confidence increased significantly with increasing training year (P<0.001) and with formal epidemiology training during residency (OR=2.01). The mean score of the 355 residents on the knowledge assessment questions was 69.8%. Increasing seniority was associated with improved overall test performance (P=0.02). Poorer performance topics included analytical study method (9.9%), study design (36.9%), and sample size (42.0%). Most (84.4%) wanted more epidemiology teaching.

CONCLUSION

Canadian obstetrics and gynaecology residents may have the biostatistical and epidemiological knowledge to interpret results published in the literature, but lack confidence applying these skills in clinical settings. Most residents want additional training in these areas, and residency programs should include training in formal curriculums to improve their confidence and prepare them for a lifelong practice of evidence-based medicine.

Technical update on tissue morcellation during gynaecologic surgery: its uses, complications, and risks of unsuspected malignancy

OBJECTIVE

To review the use of tissue morcellation in minimally invasive gynaecological surgery.

OUTCOMES

Morcellation may be used in gynaecological surgery to allow removal of large uterine specimens, providing women with a minimally invasive surgical option. Adverse oncologic outcomes of tissue morcellation should be mitigated through improved patient selection, preoperative investigations, and novel techniques that minimize tissue dispersion.

EVIDENCE

Published literature was retrieved through searches of PubMed and Medline in the spring of 2014 using appropriate controlled vocabulary (leiomyomsarcoma, uterine neoplasm, uterine myomectomy, hysterectomy) and key words (leiomyoma, endometrial cancer, uterine sarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, morcellation, and MRI). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. There were no date limits but results were limited to English or French language materials. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated in the guideline to August 2014. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology assessment-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies.

VALUES

The quality of evidence in this document was rated using the criteria described in the report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. (Table 1) BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: Gynaecologists may offer women minimally invasive surgery and this may involve tissue morcellation and the use of a power morcellator for specimen retrieval. Women should be counselled that in the case of unexpected uterine sarcoma or endometrial cancer, the use of a morcellator is associated with increased risk of tumour dissemination. Appropriate training and safe practices should be in place before offering tissue morcellation. SUMMARY STATEMENTS: 1. Uterine sarcomas may be difficult to diagnose preoperatively. The risk of an unexpected uterine sarcoma following surgery for presumed benign uterine leiomyoma is approximately 1 in 350, and the rate of leiomyosarcoma is 1 in 500. (II-2) This risk increases with age. (II-2) 2. An unexpected uterine sarcoma treated by primary surgery involving tumour disruption, including morcellation of the tumour, has the potential for intra-abdominal tumour-spread and a worse prognosis. (II-2) 3. Uterus-sparing surgery remains a safe option for patients with symptomatic leiomyomas who desire future fertility. (II-1) RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Techniques for morcellation of a uterine specimen vary, and physicians should consider employing techniques that minimize specimen disruption and intra-abdominal spread. (III-C) 2. Each patient presenting with uterine leiomyoma should be assessed for the possible presence of malignancy, based on her risk factors and preoperative imaging, although the value of these is limited. (III-C) 3. Preoperative endometrial biopsy and cervical assessment to avoid morcellation of potentially detectable malignant and premalignant conditions is recommended. (II-2A) 4. Hereditary cancer syndromes that increase the risk of uterine malignancy should be considered a contraindication to uncontained uterine morcellation. (III-C) 5. Uterine morcellation is contraindicated in women with established or suspected cancer. (II-2A) If there is a high index of suspicion of a uterine sarcoma prior to surgery, patients should be advised to proceed with a total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy, and possible oophorectomy. (II-2C) A gynaecologic oncology consultation should be obtained. 6. Tissue morcellation techniques require appropriate training and experience. Safe practice initiatives surrounding morcellation technique and the use of equipment should be implemented at the local level. (II-3B) 7. Morcellation is an acceptable option for retrieval of benign uterine specimens and may facilitate a minimally invasive surgical approach, which is associated with decreased perioperative risks. Each patient should be counselled about the possible risks associated with the use of morcellation, including the risks associated with underlying malignancy. (III-C).

Application of micro-RNA (miRNA) expression profiles for prognostication in low-risk endometrial carcinoma (LEC)

5032

Background: Reliably predicting which LEC patients are most likely to recur is a challenge for the clinician with implications on adjuvant therapy. MiRNAs have been exploited for diagnosis and prognostication in a number of malignancies. We hypothesize that miRNA expression profiles differ in tumors from patients with recurrence compared to those without recurrence. Methods: The inclusion criteria for this study are informed consent, stage 1 disease, grade 1 or 2 tumors and endometrioid histology. RNA was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues and miRNA profiling was done using Agilent Human miRNA. Differentially expressed miRNAs were identified using GeneSpring GX software and the two groups were compared using the student t-test. Results: The expression levels of 866 miRNAs were determined from LEC patients with recurrence (n=15) and without recurrence (n=16). The mean follow-up interval was 61.5 months. The average age of cancer diagnosis for patients with and without recurrence was 60.2 (range 42-75) and 59.7 (range 44-86), respectively (p=0.91). Three of 15 patients with recurrence and 6 of 16 patients without recurrence received adjuvant brachytherapy following their primary surgery (p=0.43). 17 miRNAs were identified which can distinguish between the tumors with recurrence and those without recurrence (p<0.05). MiR-146a, miR-18a, miR-222, and miR-30a showed the highest fold change difference (>5 fold) in the tumors with recurrence compared to that did not recur. A decision tree prediction model for recurrent LEC was developed where a miRNA cutoff was used as a branch in the decision tree. This model identified those patients who were most likely to recur based on the expression of 4 dysregulated miRNAs (miR-222, miR-361-3p, miR-181c and miR-125b). Conclusions: These preliminary results show the miRNA expression profile differs among LEC and can be used to distinguish an aggressive sub-group. Should future validation studies confirm this result, this information would be valuable in the design of a biomarker study to help decide which patients would benefit most from extended adjuvant treatment.