Salt-inducible kinase 1 regulates E-cadherin expression and intercellular junction stability

The protein kinase liver kinase B1 (LKB1) regulates cell polarity and intercellular junction stability. Also, LKB1 controls the activity of salt-inducible kinase 1 (SIK1). The role and relevance of SIK1 and its downstream effectors in linking the LKB1 signals within these processes are partially understood. We hypothesize that SIK1 may link LKB1 signals to the maintenance of epithelial junction stability by regulating E-cadherin expression. Results from our studies using a mouse lung alveolar epithelial (MLE-12) cell line or human renal proximal tubule (HK2) cell line transiently or stably lacking the expression of SIK1 (using SIK1 siRNAs or shRNAs), or with its expression abrogated (sik1(+/+) vs. sik1(-/-) mice), indicate that suppression of SIK1 (∼40%) increases the expression of the transcriptional repressors Snail2 (∼12-fold), Zeb1 (∼100%), Zeb2 (∼50%), and TWIST (∼20-fold) by activating cAMP-response element binding protein. The lack of SIK1 and activation of transcriptional repressors decreases the availability of E-cadherin (mRNA and protein expression by ∼100 and 80%, respectively) and the stability of intercellular junctions in epithelia (decreases in transepithelial resistance). Furthermore, LKB1-mediated increases in E-cadherin expression are impaired in cells where SIK1 has been disabled. We conclude that SIK1 is a key regulator of E-cadherin expression, and thereby contributes to the stability of intercellular junctions.

Increases in intracellular sodium activate transcription and gene expression via the salt-inducible kinase 1 network in an atrial myocyte cell line

Cardiac hypertrophy (CH) generally occurs as the result of the sustained mechanical stress caused by elevated systemic arterial blood pressure (BP). However, in animal models, elevated salt intake is associated with CH even in the absence of significant increases in BP. We hypothesize that CH is not exclusively the consequence of mechanical stress but also of other factors associated with elevated BP such as abnormal cell sodium homeostasis. We examined the effect of small increases in intracellular sodium concentration ([Na(+)](i)) on transcription factors and genes associated with CH in a cardiac cell line. Increases in [Na(+)](i) led to a time-dependent increase in the expression levels of mRNA for natriuretic peptide and myosin heavy chain genes and also increased myocyte enhancer factor (MEF)2/nuclear factor of activated T cell (NFAT) transcriptional activity. Increases in [Na(+)](i) are associated with activation of salt-inducible kinase 1 (snflk-1, SIK1), a kinase known to be critical for cardiac development. Moreover, increases in [Na(+)](i) resulted in increased SIK1 expression. Sodium did not increase MEF2/NFAT activity or gene expression in cells expressing a SIK1 that lacked kinase activity. The mechanism by which SIK1 activated MEF2 involved phosphorylation of HDAC5. Increases in [Na(+)](i) activate SIK1 and MEF2 via a parallel increase in intracellular calcium through the reverse mode of Na(+)/Ca(2+)-exchanger and activation of CaMK1. These data obtained in a cardiac cell line suggest that increases in intracellular sodium could influence myocardial growth by controlling transcriptional activation and gene expression throughout the activation of the SIK1 network.

Pharmacokinetics, drug interactions and exposure-response relationship of eslicarbazepine acetate in adult patients with partial-onset seizures: population pharmacokinetic and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses

BACKGROUND

Eslicarbazepine acetate (Zebenix®) is a voltage-gated sodium channel blocker approved in 2009 by the European Medicines Agency as adjunctive therapy in adults with partial-onset seizures, with or without secondary generalization.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of the current population pharmacokinetic (PK) and PK/pharmacodynamic analyses were to characterize the population PK of eslicarbazepine (the main active metabolite of eslicarbazepine acetate), to evaluate the influence of patient factors and concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on the PK variability of eslicarbazepine, to assess the effect of eslicarbazepine acetate on the PK of concomitant AEDs and to investigate the relationship between eslicarbazepine systemic exposure and eslicarbazepine acetate antiepileptic activity in patients with partial-onset seizures uncontrolled with one to three AEDs.

METHODS

Sparse plasma concentrations of eslicarbazepine and concomitant AEDs, along with efficacy data, were obtained from 641 patients enrolled in eslicarbazepine acetate phase III studies. Data were analysed using nonlinear mixed-effect modelling methods. Most analyses used a model using log-transformed data from trough concentration (minimum steady-state plasma concentration during a dosage interval [C(min,ss)]). The model estimated the apparent total body clearance from plasma (CL/F), which is sufficient to predict average plasma concentrations at steady state (C(av,ss)). After the final model was validated, individual concentrations at steady state were predicted, and exposure parameters (area under the plasma concentration-time curve over 24 hours, C(min,ss) and C(av,ss)) for a one-compartmental model with first-order elimination were calculated.

RESULTS

Eslicarbazepine CL/F was affected by bodyweight, dose of carbamazepine (D(CAR)) and co-administration of barbiturates or phenytoin (AED(PB)), as predicted by the equation CL/F = (2.36 + 0.00149 • D(CAR) + 1.41 • AED(PB)) • (weight/70)0.75, which means that CL/F is 2.36 L/h for a subject with a bodyweight of 70 kg and without concomitant carbamazepine and barbiturates/phenytoin. Concomitant use of lamotrigine, valproic acid, topiramate, gabapentin, clobazam and levetiracetam showed no effect on the exposure to eslicarbazepine. Inter-individual variability of eslicarbazepine CL/F was 44% and the residual error (intra-subject variability) was proportional to the log of concentrations, with a coefficient of variation of 6%. Age, ethnicity, sex and creatinine clearance did not affect eslicarbazepine CL/F. Eslicarbazepine acetate did not affect the CL/F of clobazam, gabapentin, phenytoin, phenobarbital, levetiracetam and valproic acid. Eslicarbazepine acetate slightly increased the CL/F of carbamazepine (up to 14%), lamotrigine (up to 12%) and topiramate (up to 16%). The antiepileptic effect of eslicarbazepine acetate, as assessed by a decrease in seizure frequency, increased with the increase of eslicarbazepine acetate dose and eslicarbazepine concentrations. The concomitant administration of other AEDs did not affect the eslicarbazepine acetate exposure-response relationship.

CONCLUSIONS

The magnitude of the effect of eslicarbazepine acetate on the CL/F of the concomitant AEDs assessed appears to be not clinically relevant and does not justify the need for dose adjustment in most patients. A continuous dose-response relationship was observed between eslicarbazepine concentrations and seizure frequency reduction, which was not affected by concomitant AEDs.

Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of etamicastat, a novel dopamine-β-hydroxylase inhibitor, in a rising multiple-dose study in young healthy subjects

BACKGROUND

Activation of the sympathetic nervous system is an important feature in hypertension and congestive heart failure. A strategy for directly modulating sympathetic nerve function is to reduce the biosynthesis of norepinephrine (noradrenaline) via inhibition of dopamine-β-hydroxylase (DβH).

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of etamicastat (BIA 5-453), a new DβH inhibitor, following repeated dosing.

METHODS

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study was conducted in healthy young male volunteers. Participants received once-daily doses of placebo or etamicastat 25, 50, 100, 200, 400, or 600 mg, for 10 days.

RESULTS

Etamicastat underwent N-acetylation to its metabolite BIA 5-961. Etamicastat and BIA 5-961 maximum concentrations were achieved at 1-3 and 2-4 hours, respectively, after dosing. Elimination half-lives ranged from 18.1 to 25.7 hours for etamicastat and 6.7 to 22.5 hours for BIA 5-961. Both etamicastat and BIA 5-961 followed linear pharmacokinetics. The extent of systemic exposure to etamicastat and BIA 5-961 increased in an approximately dose-proportional manner, and steady-state plasma concentrations were attained up to 9 days of dosing. Etamicastat accumulated in plasma following repeated administration. The mean observed accumulation ratio was 1.3-1.9 for etamicastat and 1.3-1.6 for BIA 5-961. Approximately 40% of the etamicastat dose was recovered in urine in the form of parent compound and BIA 5-961. There was a high variability in pharmacokinetic parameters, attributable to different N-acetyltransferase-2 (NAT2) phenotype. Urinary excretion of norepinephrine decreased following repeated administration of etamicastat. Etamicastat was generally well tolerated. There was no serious adverse event or clinically significant abnormality in clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, or ECG parameters.

CONCLUSION

Etamicastat was well tolerated. Etamicastat undergoes N-acetylation, which is markedly influenced by NAT2 phenotype. NAT2 genotyping could be a step toward personalized medicine for etamicastat.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

EudraCT No. 2007-004142-33.

Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of etamicastat following single and repeated administration in elderly versus young healthy male subjects: an open-label, single-center, parallel-group study

BACKGROUND

Etamicastat is a new dopamine-β-hydroxylase (DβH) inhibitor currently in clinical development for the treatment of hypertension and heart failure.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of etamicastat after single and repeated administration in elderly subjects (aged ≥65 years) relative to young adult healthy controls (aged 18-45 years).

METHODS

This was a single-center, open-label, parallel-group study in young male adults (n = 13; mean [SD] age 32.6 [16.4] years; range, 18-44 years; weight 79.0 [16.4] kg; systolic blood pressure 117 [12] mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure 61 [7] mm Hg) and 12 elderly male volunteers (n = 12; age 69.3 [3.3] years; weight 69.2 [9.5] kg; systolic blood pressure 115 [13] mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure 64 [4] mm Hg), conducted in 2 consecutive periods. All subjects were white, except for 1 black elderly subject. In Phase A, subjects received a single dose of 100 mg etamicastat. In Phase B, subjects received 100 mg/d etamicastat for 7 days. The pharmacokinetic parameters of etamicastat and its acetylated metabolite BIA 5-961 were calculated after the single dose of Phase A and the last dose of Phase B. Subjects' N-acetyltransferase type 1 (NAT1) and type 2 (NAT2) genotyping was performed and acetylator status inferred.

RESULTS

After a single dose of etamicastat 100 mg, mean (SD) plasma C(max) and plasma AUC(0-∞) were, respectively, 1.3 (0.5) ng/mL/kg and 12.4 (7.8) ng × h/mL/kg in elderly subjects, and 1.3 (0.4) ng/mL/kg and 10.0 (6.6) ng × h/mL/kg in young subjects. At steady-state, C(max) and AUC(0-24) were 1.8 (0.5) ng/mL/kg and 15.0 (6.4) ng × h/mL/kg in elderly subjects, and 1.5 (0.7) ng/mL/kg and 12.5 (6.5) ng × h/mL/kg in young subjects. Elderly/young geometric mean ratios and 90% CIs were, respectively, 0.944 (0.788-1.131) and 1.164 (0.730-1.855) for etamicastat C(max) and AUC(0-∞) after a single dose, and 1.225 (0.960-1.563) and 1.171 (0.850-1.612) for etamicastat C(max) and AUC(0-24) at steady state. Etamicastat steady-state plasma concentrations were reached after 3 to 4 days of dosing. The mean etamicastat accumulation ratio was 1.7 in both age groups. Following etamicastat single dose, mean (SD) BIA 5-961 C(max) and AUC(0-∞) were, respectively, 3.5 (2.1) ng/mL/kg and 28.4 (14.7) ng × h/mL/kg in elderly subjects, and 2.5 (1.5) ng/mL/kg and 16.5 (9.7) in young subjects. At steady state, BIA 5-961, C(max), and AUC(0-24) were 4.3 (2.6) ng/mL/kg and 34.6 (17.6) ng × h/mL/kg in elderly subjects, and 3.1 (2.0) ng/mL/kg and 22.2 (11.8) ng × h/mL/kg in young subjects. Large interindividual variability dependent on the NAT2 acetylator status was found in the pharmacokinetic parameters of etamicastat and BIA 5-961. Systemic exposure to etamicastat was higher and systemic exposure to BIA 5-961 was lower in NAT2 poor metabolizers compared with rapid metabolizers. No effect on heart rate and blood pressure was found in the young group. In the elderly, a decrease of supine blood pressure was observed. Postural changes in blood pressure were unaffected. Four adverse events (AEs) were reported by each group: nasopharyngeal pain, sciatica, asthenia, and back pain the elderly group, and headache (2 cases), insomnia, and myopericarditis by the young group. Myopericarditis led to study discontinuation for this subject and was considered to be of probable viral etiology. All other AEs were mild to moderate in intensity.

CONCLUSION

The pharmacokinetic profile of etamicastat was not significantly different in these small groups of healthy young versus elderly adult male volunteers.

Long-term regulation of Na+,K+-ATPase in opossum kidney cells by ouabain

Na(+),K(+)-ATPase, a basolateral transporter responsible for tubular reabsorption of Na(+) and for providing the driving force for vectorial transport of various solutes and ions, can also act as a signal transducer in response to the interaction with steroid hormones. At nanomolar concentrations ouabain binding to Na(+),K(+)-ATPase activates a signaling cascade that ultimately regulates several membrane transporters including Na(+),K(+)-ATPase. The present study evaluated the long-term effect of ouabain on Na(+),K(+)-ATPase activity (Na(+) transepithelial flux) and expression in opossum kidney (OK) cells with low (40) and high (80) number of passages in culture, which are known to overexpress Na(+),K(+)-ATPase (Silva et al., 2006, J Membr Biol 212, 163-175). Activation of a signal cascade was evaluated by quantification of ERK1/2 phosphorylation by Western blot. Na(+),K(+)-ATPase activity was determined by electrophysiological techniques and expression by Western blot. Incubation of cells with ouabain induced activation of ERK1/2. Long-term incubation with ouabain induced an increase in Na(+) transepithelial flux and Na(+),K(+)-ATPase expression only in OK cells with 80 passages in culture. This increase was prevented by incubation with inhibitors of MEK1/2 and PI-3K. In conclusion, ouabain-activated signaling cascade mediated by both MEK1/2 and PI-3K is responsible for long-term regulation of Na(+) transepithelial flux in epithelial renal cells. OK cell line with high number of passages is suggested to constitute a particular useful model for the understanding of ouabain-mediated regulation of Na(+) transport.

Hepatic UDP-glucuronosyltransferase is responsible for eslicarbazepine glucuronidation

Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a once-daily novel antiepileptic drug approved in Europe for use as adjunctive therapy for refractory partial-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization. Metabolism of ESL consists primarily of hydrolysis to eslicarbazepine, which is then subject to glucuronidation followed by renal excretion. In this study, we have identified that human liver microsomes (HLM) enriched with uridine 5'-diphosphoglucuronic acid give origin to a single Escherichia coli β-glucuronidase-sensitive eslicarbazepine glucuronide (most likely the O-glucuronide). The kinetics of eslicarbazepine glucuronidation in HLM was investigated in the presence and absence of bovine serum albumin (BSA). The apparent K(m) were 412.2 ± 63.8 and 349.7 ± 74.3 μM in the presence and absence of BSA, respectively. Incubations with recombinant human UDP glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) indicated that UGT1A4, UGT1A9, UGT2B4, UGT2B7, and UGT2B17 appear to be involved in eslicarbazepine conjugation. The UGT with the highest affinity for conjugation was UGT2B4 (K(m) = 157.0 ± 31.2 and 28.7 ± 10.1 μM, in the absence and presence of BSA, respectively). There was a significant correlation between eslicarbazepine glucuronidation and trifluoperazine glucuronidation, a typical UGT1A4 substrate; however, no correlation was found with typical substrates for UGT1A1 and UGT1A9. Diclofenac inhibited eslicarbazepine glucuronidation in HLM with an IC(50) value of 17 μM. In conclusion, glucuronidation of eslicarbazepine results from the contribution of UGT1A4, UGT1A9, UGT2B4, UGT2B7, and UGT2B17, but the high-affinity component of the UGT2B4 isozyme may play a major role at therapeutic plasma concentrations of unbound eslicarbazepine.

Long-term efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate: results of a 1-year open-label extension study in partial-onset seizures in adults with epilepsy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of once daily eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) as adjunctive therapy for partial-onset seizures in adults with epilepsy.

METHODS

One-year open-label treatment extension with ESL in patients who completed a placebo-controlled pivotal study (Epilepsia 2009; 50: 454-463). Starting dose was 800 mg once daily, for 4 weeks; thereafter, dose could be titrated up or down. Doses of concomitant antiepileptic drugs were to be kept stable.

RESULTS

Overall, 314 patients were enrolled. The intent-to-treat population consisted of 312 patients, and 239 (76.6%) completed 1 year of treatment. ESL median dose was 800 mg once daily. Compared to baseline, median seizure frequency decreased by 39% during the first 4 weeks and between 48% and 56% thereafter. The responder rate (≥50% seizure reduction) was 41% during weeks 1-4 and, thereafter ranged between 48% and 53%. The proportion of seizure-free patients per 12-week interval ranged between 8.7% and 12.5%. Quality of life, as measured by the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-31 (QOLIE-31), and depressive symptoms, as measured by the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), improved significantly compared to baseline. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 51% of patients. The most frequent TEAEs were headache (10%), dizziness (10%), diplopia (5%), and nasopharyngitis (5%). TEAEs were mostly (97%) of mild to moderate intensity. Eleven patients (3.5%) discontinued due to TEAEs. There were no results of laboratory tests raising safety concerns.

DISCUSSION

Sustained therapeutic effect, favorable tolerability and safety, and an improvement in quality of life and depressive symptoms were observed during long-term add-on treatment of partial-onset seizures in adults with once daily ESL.

Long-term efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate: results of a 1-year open-label extension study in partial-onset seizures in adults with epilepsy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of once daily eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) as adjunctive therapy for partial-onset seizures in adults with epilepsy.

METHODS

One-year open-label treatment extension with ESL in patients who completed a placebo-controlled pivotal study (Epilepsia 2009; 50: 454-463). Starting dose was 800 mg once daily, for 4 weeks; thereafter, dose could be titrated up or down. Doses of concomitant antiepileptic drugs were to be kept stable.

RESULTS

Overall, 314 patients were enrolled. The intent-to-treat population consisted of 312 patients, and 239 (76.6%) completed 1 year of treatment. ESL median dose was 800 mg once daily. Compared to baseline, median seizure frequency decreased by 39% during the first 4 weeks and between 48% and 56% thereafter. The responder rate (≥50% seizure reduction) was 41% during weeks 1-4 and, thereafter ranged between 48% and 53%. The proportion of seizure-free patients per 12-week interval ranged between 8.7% and 12.5%. Quality of life, as measured by the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-31 (QOLIE-31), and depressive symptoms, as measured by the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), improved significantly compared to baseline. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 51% of patients. The most frequent TEAEs were headache (10%), dizziness (10%), diplopia (5%), and nasopharyngitis (5%). TEAEs were mostly (97%) of mild to moderate intensity. Eleven patients (3.5%) discontinued due to TEAEs. There were no results of laboratory tests raising safety concerns.

DISCUSSION

Sustained therapeutic effect, favorable tolerability and safety, and an improvement in quality of life and depressive symptoms were observed during long-term add-on treatment of partial-onset seizures in adults with once daily ESL.

Pharmacokinetic interaction study between eslicarbazepine acetate and topiramate in healthy subjects

OBJECTIVE

Combination therapy is frequently required in the management of epilepsy. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic interaction between eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) 1200 mg once daily and topiramate (TPM) 200 mg once daily in healthy subjects.

METHODS

Multiple-dose, open-label, one-sequence study in two parallel groups of 16 healthy male volunteers. After an 8-day treatment with ESL (Group A) or TPM (Group B), ESL and TPM were co-administered for 19 days. A bioequivalence approach based on a within-subject comparison was used to investigate a potential drug-drug interaction. End/start of treatment geometric mean ratios (GMR, %) and 90% confidence intervals (90% CI) were calculated for maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval at steady-state (AUC(ss)) of eslicarbazepine (ESL major active metabolite), R-licarbazepine (ESL minor active metabolite) and TPM at Day 8 and Day 27.

RESULTS

In Group A, eslicarbazepine GMR (90% CI) was 86.79% (81.06%; 92.94%) for C(max) and 92.70% (89.21%; 96.32%) for AUC(ss). In Group B, TPM GMR (90% CI) was 81.50% (77.48%; 85.89%) for C(max) and 81.81% (79.69%; 84.00%) for AUC(ss). The 90% CI of eslicarbazepine C(max) and AUC(ss) fell within the pre-specified bioequivalence range (80.00%; 125.00%), allowing it to be concluded that the extent of systemic exposure to eslicarbazepine was unaffected by the concomitant administration of TPM. The 90% CI for topiramate AUC(ss) was borderline in relation to the pre-specified bioequivalence range and topiramate C(max) fell outside the pre-specified bioequivalence range. Therefore, the extent of systemic exposure to TPM following co-administration with ESL was not formally bioequivalent to the extent of systemic exposure to TPM when TPM was administered alone. However, there was no difference between TPM elimination half-life following TPM co-administered with ESL and TPM administered alone (24.0 and 24.3 h, respectively). The bioavailability of R-licarbazepine was essentially bioequivalent. Two subjects discontinued due to adverse events. No clinical interaction appeared to be present in terms of adverse events when both drugs were given concomitantly.

CONCLUSION

Concomitant administration of eslicarbazepine acetate 1200 mg once daily and topiramate 200 mg once daily showed no significant change in exposure to eslicarbazepine but an 18% decrease in exposure to topiramate, most likely caused by a reduced bioavailability of topiramate. No dose adjustment is required.

Chronopharmacology of nebicapone, a new catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the chronopharmacology of nebicapone, a new catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor currently being developed for use as an adjunct to levodopa/carbidopa or levodopa/benserazide in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.

METHODS

This was a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Eighteen Caucasian subjects were randomly assigned to treatment with either nebicapone 100 mg (n = 6), nebicapone 200 mg (n = 6) or placebo (n = 6) at 4-h intervals for 7 days. First dose occurred at 8:00 AM on day 1 and last dose at 8:00 AM on day 8. Blood samples for the determination of plasma drug concentrations of nebicapone and its glucuronidated and methylated metabolites and for the assay of erythrocyte soluble COMT (S-COMT) activity were taken at frequent times following the first and last doses, and before the 8:00 AM and 8:00 PM doses on days 2-7.

RESULTS

Three men and three women in each group participated in the study. Mean +/- SD (range) age of study participants was 23.7 +/- 3.1 (21-28) years in the nebicapone 100 mg group, 22.2 +/- 0.4 (22-23) years in the nebicapone 200 mg group and 24.3 +/- 5.4 (18-32) in the placebo group. A circadian variation in the pre-dose nebicapone and nebicapone-glucuronide plasma concentrations was apparent. Both nebicapone and nebicapone-glucuronide levels were lower before the 8 PM dose in comparison to the 8 AM dose, suggesting that the absorption of nebicapone may follow a circadian variation. S-COMT activity showed no circadian variation in the placebo group. Therefore, the S-COMT activity variation found in nebicapone-treated subjects is considered to be due to changes in plasma concentrations of nebicapone, which is consistent with the fact that the pre-dose S-COMT activity was lower at the time at which nebicapone levels were maximal. Four subjects in the nebicapone 100 mg and placebo groups and six subjects in the nebicapone 200 mg group reported at least one adverse event (AE). All AEs were of mild or moderate intensity. Both nebicapone treatment regimens were subjectively well-tolerated, but a clinically relevant elevation in aspartate transaminase was observed in one subject of each nebicapone group.

CONCLUSION

Nebicapone showed chronopharmacology in young Caucasian healthy subjects. The clinical impact of the circadian variation in the nebicapone metabolism and activity in Parkinson's disease patients deserves evaluation as it may have implications for drug prescription by modulating the distribution of the total daily dose along the 24-h scale.

Pharmacokinetic interaction study between eslicarbazepine acetate and lamotrigine in healthy subjects

OBJECTIVE

Anti-epileptic drugs are often used in combination. Both eslicarbazepine (main metabolite of eslicarbazepine acetate, ESL) and lamotrigine undergo conjugation with glucuronic acid, and both eslicarbazepine and its glucuronide and lamotrigine glucuronide undergo extensive renal elimination; therefore, there is a potential for interaction. This study investigated the interaction between ESL and lamotrigine in healthy subjects.

METHODS

Open-label study in two parallel groups of 16 healthy volunteers each. After an 8-day treatment with ESL or lamotrigine, ESL (1200 mg once-daily) and lamotrigine (150 mg once-daily) were co-administered for 19 days. Geometric mean ratios (GMR) and 90% confidence intervals (90% CI) for maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve in the dosing interval (AUC(0-24)) were calculated for eslicarbazepine (ESL active metabolite) and lamotrigine.

RESULTS

The C(max) and AUC(0-24) GMR (90% CI) were, respectively, 95% (87-102%) and 96% (91-102%) for eslicarbazepine, and 88% (82-94%) and 86% (81-92%) for lamotrigine. The 90% CI of the C(max) and AUC(0-24) GMR fell within the prespecified acceptance interval (80-125%) both for eslicarbazepine and lamotrigine.

CONCLUSION

There was no significant pharmacokinetic interaction between ESL and lamotrigine in healthy subjects. Therefore, no dosage adjustment appears to be usually required in either lamotrigine or ESL when the drugs are co-administered.

Dopamine and G protein-coupled receptor kinase 4 in the kidney: role in blood pressure regulation

Complex interactions between genes and environment result in a sodium-induced elevation in blood pressure (salt sensitivity) and/or hypertension that lead to significant morbidity and mortality affecting up to 25% of the middle-aged adult population worldwide. Determining the etiology of genetic and/or environmentally-induced high blood pressure has been difficult because of the many interacting systems involved. Two main pathways have been implicated as principal determinants of blood pressure since they are located in the kidney (the key organ responsible for blood pressure regulation), and have profound effects on sodium balance: the dopaminergic and renin-angiotensin systems. These systems counteract or modulate each other, in concert with a host of intracellular second messenger pathways to regulate sodium and water balance. In particular, the G protein-coupled receptor kinase type 4 (GRK4) appears to play a key role in regulating dopaminergic-mediated natriuresis. Constitutively activated GRK4 gene variants (R65L, A142V, and A486V), by themselves or by their interaction with other genes involved in blood pressure regulation, are associated with essential hypertension and/or salt-sensitive hypertension in several ethnic groups. GRK4γ 142Vtransgenic mice are hypertensive on normal salt intake while GRK4γ 486V transgenic mice develop hypertension only with an increase in salt intake. GRK4 gene variants have been shown to hyperphosphorylate, desensitize, and internalize two members of the dopamine receptor family, the D(1) (D(1)R) and D(3) (D(3)R) dopamine receptors, but also increase the expression of a key receptor of the renin-angiotensin system, the angiotensin type 1 receptor (AT(1)R). Knowledge of the numerous blood pressure regulatory pathways involving angiotensin and dopamine may provide new therapeutic approaches to the pharmacological regulation of sodium excretion and ultimately blood pressure control.

Efficacy and safety of 800 and 1200 mg eslicarbazepine acetate as adjunctive treatment in adults with refractory partial-onset seizures

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) as adjunctive therapy in adults with partial-onset seizures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study consisting of an 8-week baseline period, after which patients were randomized to placebo (n = 87) or once-daily ESL 800 mg (n = 85) or 1200 mg (n = 80). Patients received half dose during 2 weeks preceding a 12-week maintenance period.

RESULTS

Seizure frequency over the maintenance period was significantly (P < 0.05) lower than placebo in both ESL groups. Responder rate was 23% (placebo), 35% (800 mg), and 38% (1200 mg). Median relative reduction in seizure frequency was 17% (placebo), 38% (800 mg), and 42% (1200 mg). The most common adverse events (AEs) (>10%) were dizziness, somnolence, headache, and nausea. The majority of AEs were of mild or moderate severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Once-daily treatment with ESL 800 and 1200 mg was effective and generally well tolerated.