Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation After Nonmitral Cardiac Surgery: MitraClip Versus Surgical Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Surgical mitral valve repair is the conventional treatment for severe degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR). MitraClip therapy has emerged as a viable option in high-risk surgical patients. We sought to compare conventional surgery to MitraClip therapy in patients with severe degenerative mitral valve prolapse (MVP) and previous cardiac interventions.

METHODS

From January 2012 to May 2016, 131 patients with previous cardiac surgery and subsequent intervention for degenerative MVP were included in this analysis: 75 (57.3%) underwent surgical repair and 56 (42.7%) underwent MitraClip placement. Follow-up was available in all early survivors at median of 11 (interquartile range, 0 to 32) months for surgery and 11 (interquartile range, 3 to 21) months for MitraClip patients.

RESULTS

MitraClip patients were older (75.7 ± 8.6 years of age versus 68.6 ± 13.1 of age; p < 0.001), and had higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk scores (5.8 ± 2.4 versus 2.7 ± 2.3; p < 0.001). Median length-of-stay was 7 (interquartile range, 5 to 11) days for surgery and 2 (interquartile range, 2 to 4) days for MitraClip patients (p < 0.001), but 30-day mortality was comparable between the 2 groups (2.7% versus 3.6%; p = 0.77). Recurrent MR (moderate or severe) was significantly higher for MitraClip patients, both at discharge (43.1% versus 5.4%; p < 0.001) and at 1-year follow-up (66.7% versus 33.3%; p = 0.02). At 1 year postintervention, freedom from mitral reintervention was significantly higher for surgical patients (100.0% versus 87.5%; p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with previous cardiac interventions and severe degenerative MVP, a repeat conventional surgery is safe and durable. Percutaneous MitraClip repair is effective but associated with higher risk of residual MR, and should only be considered in selected patients. Careful patient selection using a heart team approach is recommended.

Hypercholesterolemia after conversion to sirolimus as primary immunosuppression and cardiac allograft vasculopathy in heart transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Sirolimus (SRL) attenuates cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) progression after heart transplantation (HT) but often results in hyperlipidemia. In this study we investigated the differential effects of SRL-based and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppression on CAV progression and clinical outcomes in HT recipients.

METHODS

CAV progression was assessed by coronary intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) as changes in volumetric measurements after correction to time between the first and last follow-up IVUS exams. CAV progression rate and CAV-associated events were compared between patients with mean follow-up low-density lipoprotein (LDL) <100 mg/dl (lower level or LL) and ≥100 mg/dl (higher level or HL) in the SRL and CNI groups.

RESULTS

We identified 227 patients on SRL (LL: 118; HL: 109) and 96 on CNI (LL: 56; HL: 40), with a median follow-up of 6.7 years. Clinical characteristics did not differ between the LL and HL groups and all patients were on statins. In the SRL arm, there were no significant differences in CAV progression rate and there were no differences in all-cause mortality and CAV-associated events between the LL and HL groups. In the CNI arm, the Δ change in plaque volume normalized to segment length and time of follow-up (PV/SL/year) (0.55 ± 0.53 vs 1.53 ± 2.32, p = 0.003) and Δ change in plaque index per year (defined as PV/vessel volume ratio) (3.1 ± 3.7% vs 6.3 ± 10.4%; p = 0.034) were significantly lower in the LL than the HL group. After adjusting for patient characteristics, HL was associated with higher rates of advanced CAV requiring coronary angioplasty (hazard ratio [HR] 3.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05 to 9.40, p = 0.040) and higher rates of all CAV-associated events (HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.10 to 4.54, p = 0.026) in these CNI-treated subjects.

CONCLUSION

Unlike CNI-based immunosuppression, the effects of SRL on attenuating CAV progression are independent of LDL cholesterol levels post-HT.

Timing of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor initiation and allograft vasculopathy progression and outcomes in heart transplant recipients

Aims

Early studies from the 1990s have shown that statins improve survival and attenuate cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). However, little contemporary data are available on the incremental benefit of statins with the current use of new‐generation immunosuppressive agents and the use of coronary intravascular ultrasound for assessment of CAV. We sought to investigate the effect of early statin (ES) as compared with late statin (LS) initiation after heart transplantation (HT) on long‐term CAV progression and clinical outcomes in a large contemporary HT cohort.

Methods and results

We analysed a cohort of 409 adult HT recipients. CAV progression was assessed by serial coronary intravascular ultrasound volumetric measurements of the differences between baseline and last follow‐up plaque volume (PV) and plaque index (PV/vessel volume ratio). CAV progression and clinical outcomes were compared between the ES (<2 years after HT) and the LS (>2 years after HT) groups. During a median follow‐up of 8.2 years, ES resulted in significantly lower change (Δ) of plaque index (+3.8% ± 1.7% vs. +8.2% ± 3.6%; P = 0.0008) and PV (+0.8 ± 0.3 vs. +1.9 ± 1.2; P = 0.045) compared with LS group. In a Cox proportional hazards regression model and after adjustment for baseline characteristics, ES was associated with a 52% decreased risk of CAV‐associated events (hazard ratio 0.48, 95% confidence interval: 0.27–0.91; P = 0.025) and a 42% decreased risk of the composite endpoint of all‐cause mortality and CAV‐associated events (hazard ratio 0.58, 95% confidence interval: 0.38–0.91; P = 0.019).

Conclusions

Early initiation of statin therapy after HT results in attenuated CAV progression as well as in decreased CAV‐related events and mortality.

Conventional redo biological valve replacement over 20 years: Surgical benchmarks should guide patient selection for transcatheter valve-in-valve therapy

OBJECTIVES

Although primary transcatheter valve interventions have demonstrated acceptable early- and intermediate-term outcomes, data are lacking to guide patient selection for transcatheter valve-in-valve therapy. Furthermore, very few surgical benchmarks have been established for repeat conventional biological valve replacement to refine momentum for broad application of transcatheter intervention for a degenerated bioprosthesis.

METHODS

From January 1993 to July 2014, 694 patients underwent repeat biological valve replacement at our clinic. Median age at repeat operation was 71 years (range, 26-95 years) and there were 437 men (63%). Hypertension was present in 453 patients (65%), diabetes in 128 patients (18%), prior myocardial infarction in 85 patients (12%), and prior stroke in 81 patients (12%). Prior coronary bypass grafting was performed in 212 patients (31%). Median left ventricular ejection fraction was 41% (range, 20-61) and New York Heart Association functional class III or IV was present in 529 patients (76%).

RESULTS

Biological valve re-replacement included most commonly aortic valve in 464 patients (67%) and mitral valve in 170 (24%). Concomitant coronary bypass grafting was performed in 134 patients (19%). Mortality at 30 days occurred in 56 patients (8%). Multivariable analysis with backward stepwise regression identified New York Heart Association functional class (per 1 increment) (hazard ratio, 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-4.3; P = .03) and prior coronary bypass grafting (hazard ratio, 3.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-10.9; P = .03) as independent predictors of early death. Patients with the combination of prior coronary bypass grafting and New York Heart Association functional class III or IV accounted for 26 out of 56 early deaths (46%) and in the absence of this combination, early death in the cohort was 30 out of 694 (4%). Follow-up was available in 602 out of 638 early survivors (94%) for a median of 45 months (range, 1 month-23.4 years). Survival at 5 and 10 years was 63% and 34%, respectively. For patients who died during follow-up, 2-dimensional scatter plots demonstrate durable length of postoperative survival (median, 5.5 years; maximum, 22 years).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large population of patients undergoing repeat biological valve replacement, prior coronary bypass grafting and advanced New York Heart Association functional class were associated with increased 30-day mortality, with the remaining population having a low 30-day mortality of 4%. This study could serve as a surgical benchmark to guide patient selection for transcatheter valve-in-valve technology rather than employing a broader application of these techniques to those who may otherwise have low early risk of mortality and durable long-term survival after conventional valve surgery.

Uric acid is an independent predictor of cardiac allograft vasculopathy after heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a major complication after heart transplantation (HT). Uric acid (UA) may play a role in CAV due to its role in stimulating T-cell-mediated immunity. Sirolimus is associated with CAV attenuation through a number of mechanisms, including immune-mediated effects. We aimed to determine whether UA is an independent predictor of CAV and whether conversion to sirolimus as primary immunosuppression modulates UA levels.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 224 patients who underwent HT between 2004 and 2015 and had serial coronary intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) studies. Serum UA levels were measured at baseline and last follow-up IVUS in all participants. CAV progression was assessed by measuring the change in plaque volume (ΔPV) and plaque index (ratio of plaque volume to vessel volume [ΔPI]) between last follow-up and baseline IVUS after correction for time of follow-up.

RESULTS

Patients with high (≥7 mg/dl) compared with low (<7 mg/dl) UA had increased median ΔPV (0.33 [interquartile range 0.08 to 0.93] vs 0.07 [-0.17 to 0.38] mm³/mm/year; p < 0.001) and ΔPI (2.0% [0.31% to 3.9%] vs 0.33% [-1.2% to 2.0%]; p < 0.001). Elevated UA levels were associated with a significantly increased risk of developing significant CAV progression (ΔPV >0.50 mm³/mm) (hazard ratio 2.2, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 4.6; p = 0.037). Sirolimus resulted in decreased UA levels (5.8 ± 1.4 vs 5.2 ± 1.5; p = 0.002) and patients converted to sirolimus and had low UA levels had the least CAV progression (p < 0.001). After adjustment for potential confounders, change in UA level was also an independent predictor of CAV progression.

CONCLUSIONS

UA is an independent predictor of CAV after HT. Sirolimus is associated with decreased UA levels and may explain one of the mechanisms by which sirolimus attenuates CAV progression.

Impact of Intubation Time on Survival following Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Insights from the Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) Trial

OBJECTIVE

The authors aimed to assess determinants of intubation time and evaluate its impact on 30-day and 1-year postoperative survival in Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial patients.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND INTERVENTIONS

A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used among the 1,446 surgical patients from the STICH trial who survived 36 hours after operation, in order to identify perioperative factors associated with 30-day and 1-year postoperative mortality. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to determine risk factors associated with intubation time.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

At 36 hours post-operation, 1,298 (out of 1,446) were extubated and 148 (10.2%) still intubated. Median postoperative intubation time was 11.4 hours. Among patients surviving 36 hours, a multivariable model was developed to predict 30-day (c-index = 0.88) and 1-year (c-index = 0.78) mortality. Intubation time was the strongest independent predictor of 30-day (hazard ratio [HR] 5.50) and 1-year mortality (HR 3.69). Predictors of intubation time >36 hours included mitral valve procedure, New York Heart Association class, left ventricular systolic volume index, creatinine, previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and age. Results were similar in patients surviving 24 hours post-operation, where intubation time was also the strongest predictor of 30-day (HR 4.18, c-index 0.87) and 1-year (HR 2.81, c-index 0.78) mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Intubation time is the strongest predictor of 30-day and 1-year mortality among patients with ischemic heart failure undergoing CABG. Combining intubation time with other mortality risk factors may allow the identification of patients at the highest risk for whom the development of specific strategies may improve outcomes.

Aortic valve replacement in patients with amyloidosis

BACKGROUND

Outcome data on aortic valve replacement in patients with amyloidosis are limited. To address this issue, we reviewed our experience of patients with amyloidosis who underwent aortic valve replacement.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 16 patients with amyloidosis who underwent aortic valve replacement between May 2000 and February 2017.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 11 males (69%) and 5 females (31%). The median patient age was 76 years (interquartile range [IQR], 71-82 years), and Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted rate of mortality was 5.0% (IQR, 2.4%-8.7%). Amyloidosis type was immunoglobulin light chain in 6 patients (38%), age-related in 6 (38%), and localized in 4 (25%). The operation was surgical aortic valve replacement in 11 patients (69%) and balloon-expandable transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve insertion in the other 5. There was no procedure-related stroke, need for new-onset dialysis or pacemaker, or death within 30 days of surgery. The median length of hospital stay was 1 day (IQR, 1-2 days) in the transcatheter valve insertion group and 6 days (IQR, 6-8 days) in the surgical group (P = .002). Follow-up was available for all patients at a median of 1.9 years (IQR, 1.2-4.8 years). During the follow-up period, there were 4 deaths, all occurring >1 year after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic valve replacement can be performed with low risk of operative morbidity and mortality in patients with amyloidosis. Transcatheter valve insertion has the advantage of reduced hospital length of stay. The 1-year survival is excellent.

Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Outcomes in Patients Supported With Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Background

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a risk factor for morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure. The effect of DM on post–left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation outcomes is unclear. This study sought to investigate whether patients with DM had worse outcomes than patients without DM after LVAD implantation and whether LVAD support resulted in a better control of DM.

Methods and Results

We retrospectively reviewed 341 consecutive adults who underwent implantation of LVAD from 2007 to 2016. Patient characteristics and adverse events were studied and compared between patients with and without DM. One hundred thirty-one patients (38%) had DM. Compared with patients without DM, those with DM had higher rates of ischemic cardiomyopathy, LVAD implantation as destination therapy, and increased baseline body mass index. In a proportional hazards (Cox) model with adjustment for relevant covariates and median follow-up of 16.1 months, DM was associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.73; 95% confidence interval: 1.18–2.53; P =0.005) and increased risk of nonfatal LVAD-related complications, including a composite of stroke, pump thrombosis, and device infection (hazard ratio, 2.1; 95% confidence interval: 1.35–3.18; P =0.001). Preoperative hemoglobin A1c was not significantly associated with mortality or adverse events among patients with DM. LVAD implantation resulted in a remarkable decrease in hemoglobin A1c levels (7.4±1.9 pre-LVAD versus 6.0±1.5 and 6.3±1.4 after 3 and 12 months post-LVAD, respectively; P <0.0001) and a significant reduction in requirements of DM medications.

Conclusions

DM is associated with increased rates of all-cause mortality and major adverse events despite favorable glycemic control after LVAD implantation.

Prediction Model for Wait Times in Cardiac Transplantation

Wait times have increased for patients approved for heart transplants. We reviewed United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data for 14,242 patients listed for isolated heart transplant (2009-2013) to develop a risk score model for timing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation in bridge-to-transplant patients. We used a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model with subsequent bootstrap resampling for internal validation to develop a scoring system that combined risk factors, weighted by the corresponding regression coefficients, to define an individual's risk score. Four risk factors were identified (body mass index, blood type, region, and urgency status) to be significantly and independently associated with wait time (p < 0.001), showing adequate model discrimination (C = 0.704) and calibration. Higher risk scores correlated with shorter wait times. Our model corresponded closely with observed transplant rates, predicting longer wait times for lower status, larger size, certain blood groups, and some UNOS regions. This tool has the potential to more accurately describe the wait-time duration for an individual patient, which may influence care decisions. The wait-time discrepancies (blood types/regions) reinforce the need to reevaluate the geographic-allocation policy. The proposed review of the UNOS heart allocation policy may make this model especially relevant.

Renal Allograft Outcome After Simultaneous Heart and Kidney Transplantation

Chronic kidney disease frequently accompanies end-stage heart failure and may result in consideration of simultaneous heart and kidney transplantation (SHKT). In recent years, there has been a significant increase in SHKT. This single-center cohort consisted of 35 patients who underwent SHKT during 1996 to 2015. The aim of this study was to review factors that may predict better long-term outcome after SKHT. Thirteen patients (37%) had delayed graft function (DGF) after transplant (defined as the need for dialysis during the first 7 days after transplant), which was significantly associated with mechanical circulatory support device therapy and high right ventricular systolic pressure before transplant. Most of the recipients had glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≥50 ml/min/1.73 m² at 1 and 3 years after transplant (21 of 26 [81%] and 20 of 21 [95%], respectively). Higher donor age was associated with reduced 1-year GFR (p = 0.017), and higher recipient pretransplant body mass index was associated with reduced 3-year GFR (p = 0.008). There was a significant association between DGF and reduced median GFR at 1 and 3 years after transplant (p <0.005). Patient survival rates at 6 months, 1, and 3 years after transplant were 97%, 91%, and 86% respectively. In conclusions, our data support good outcomes after SHKT. Mechanical circulatory support device therapy and pulmonary hypertension before transplant are associated with DGF, which is a risk factor for poor long-term renal allograft function.

Experience With Pericardiectomy for Constrictive Pericarditis Over Eight Decades

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to review the surgical outcomes of pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis and to examine risk factors for overall mortality in a contemporary period.

METHODS

We reviewed all patients who underwent pericardiectomy for constriction from 1936 through 2013. The investigation included constrictive pericarditis cases confirmed intraoperatively, all other types of pericarditis were excluded; 1,071 pericardiectomies were performed in 1,066 individual patients. Patients were divided into two intervals: a historical (pre-1990) group (n = 259) and a contemporary (1990-2013) group (n = 807).

RESULTS

Patients in the contemporary group were older (61 versus 49 years; p < 0.001), more symptomatic (NYHA class III or IV in 79.6% versus 71.2%; p < 0.001), and more frequently underwent concomitant procedures (21.4% versus 5.4%; p < 0.001) compared with those in the historical group. In contrast to the historical cases in which the etiologies of constriction were mostly idiopathic (81.1%), nearly half of contemporary cases had a nonidiopathic etiology (postoperative 32.3%, radiation 11.4%). Although 30-day mortality decreased from 13.5% in the historical era to 5.2% in the contemporary era (p < 0.001), overall survival was similar after adjusting for patient characteristics. Risk factors of overall mortality in the contemporary group included NYHA class III or IV (HR 2.17, p < 0.001), etiology of radiation (HR 3.93, p < 0.001) or postcardiac surgery (HR 1.47, p < 0.001), and need for cardiopulmonary bypass (HR 1.35, p = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

There was a significant change in disease etiology over the study period. Long-term survival after pericardiectomy is affected by patient characteristics including etiology of constriction and severity of symptoms.

Cardiothoracic Transplant Recipient Mycoplasma hominis: An Uncommon Infection with Probable Donor Transmission

The role of infection with Mycoplasma hominis following cardiothoracic organ transplantation and its source of transmission have not been well-defined. Here, we identify and describe infection with M. hominis in patients following cardiothoracic organ transplantation after reviewing all cardiothoracic transplantations performed at our center between 1998 and July 2015. We found seven previously unreported cases of M. hominis culture positive infection all of whom presented with pleuritis, surgical site infection, and/or mediastinitis. PCR was used to establish the diagnosis in four cases. In two instances, paired single lung transplant recipients manifested infection, and in one of these pairs, isolates were indistinguishable by multilocus sequence typing (MLST). To investigate the prevalence of M. hominis in the lower respiratory tract, we tested 178 bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluids collected from immunocompromised subjects for M. hominis by PCR; all were negative. Review of the literature revealed an additional 15 cases of M. hominis in lung transplant recipients, most with similar clinical presentations to our cases. We recommend that M. hominis should be considered in post-cardiothoracic transplant infections presenting with pleuritis, surgical site infection, or mediastinitis. M. hominis PCR may facilitate early diagnosis and prompt therapy. Evaluation for possible donor transmission should be considered.

Effect of Pretransplant Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices on Cellular and Antibody-Mediated Rejection and Subsequent Allograft Outcomes

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVAD) on subsequent rejection after heart transplantation (HT) by using cellular rejection score and antibody-mediated rejection score (AMRS) and correlating with subsequent allograft outcomes. We retrospectively analyzed 108 consecutive patients who underwent HT without (n = 67) or with (n = 41) previous CF-LVAD in 2008 to 2014. The 24 months cumulative effect of rejection was calculated by using cellular rejection scores and AMRS, based on the total number of rejections divided by valid biopsy samples. Vasculopathy was assessed both by routine coronary angiogram and intravascular ultrasound. Patients who underwent pretransplant CF-LVAD demonstrated a significant increase in the number of cellular rejection episodes as compared with the nonbridged patients, for 1 and 2 years of follow-up (p = 0.026 and p = 0.016), respectively. There were no differences in AMRS (p >0.05) and allograft outcomes, such as vasculopathy and overall survival (p >0.05) over the period of follow-up. Implantation of a CF-LVAD before HT impacts cellular rejection during the post-transplant period. Despite these findings, CF-LVAD does not translate to differences in allograft outcomes after transplant, such as vasculopathy and overall survival over the period of the study. In conclusion, whether this affects longer term outcomes than studied remains to be determined.

Liver Allograft Provides Immunoprotection for the Cardiac Allograft in Combined Heart-Liver Transplantation

When transplanted simultaneously, the liver allograft has been thought to have an immunoprotective role on other organs; however, detailed analyses in simultaneous heart-liver transplantation (SHLT) have not been done to date. We analyzed patient outcomes and incidence of immune-mediated injury in 22 consecutive SHLT versus 223 isolated heart transplantation (IHT) recipients between January 2004 and December 2013, by reviewing 3912 protocol- and indication-specific cardiac allograft biopsy specimens. Overall survival was similar (86.4%, 86.4%, and 69.1% for SHLT and 93.3%, 84.7%, and 70.0% for IHT at 1, 5, and 10 years; p = 0.83). Despite similar immunosuppression, the incidence of T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) was lower in SHLT (31.8%) than in IHT (84.8%) (p < 0.0001). Although more SHLT patients had preexisting donor-specific HLA antibody (22.7% versus 8.1%; p = 0.04), the incidence of antibody-mediated rejection was not different in SHLT compared with IHT (4.5% versus 14.8%, p = 0.33). While the left ventricular ejection fraction was comparable in both groups at 5 years, the incidence and severity of cardiac allograft vasculopathy were reduced in the SHLT recipients (42.9% versus 66.8%, p = 0.03). Simultaneously transplanted liver allograft was associated with reduced risk of TCMR (odds ratio [OR] 0.003, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0-0.02; p < 0.0001), antibody-mediated rejection (OR 0.04, 95% CI 0-0.46; p = 0.004), and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.07-0.84; p = 0.02), after adjusting for other risk factors. These data suggest that the incidence of alloimmune injury in the heart allograft is reduced in SHLT recipients.

Heart transplantation after Fontan: Results from a surgical Fontan cohort

We performed a retrospective review of outcomes after heart transplantation during long-term follow-up of a surgical cohort of 1138 Fontan patients who were followed at the Mayo Clinic. Follow-up information was obtained from medical records and a clinical questionnaire that was mailed to patients not known to be deceased at the initiation of the study. Forty-four of 1138 Fontan patients with initial or subsequent evaluation at Mayo had cardiac transplantation between 1988 and 2014 (mean age at transplantation was 23.2 ± 12 yr, median was 19.8 yr; mean interval between Fontan and transplantation was 13.0 ± 7.7 yr, median was 13.1 yr). Two patients had combined organ transplantation (one heart-lung, one heart-liver). Twelve of the 44 (27%) patients had PLE prior to transplantation. There was no difference in post-bypass Fontan pressures or incidence of late reoperations for AVV repair/replacement between transplanted and non-transplanted patients. There were 16 (36%) deaths in the transplantation cohort; seven occurred within 30 days of transplantation. Overall one, five, 10, and 15 yr post-transplantation survival was 80%, 72%, 69%, and 55%, respectively. Although this is a challenging group of patients, intermediate-term results suggest that cardiac transplantation remains a reasonable option for patients with a failed Fontan circulation.

Left Internal Mammary Artery Versus Coronary Stents: Impact on Downstream Coronary Stenoses and Conduit Patency

BACKGROUND

The study compared downstream coronary and conduit disease progression in the left anterior descending coronary artery treated with coronary artery bypass grafting using the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) versus percutaneous coronary intervention with bare metal stent (BMS) or drug eluting stent (DES).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 12 301 consecutive patients underwent isolated primary coronary revascularization, of which 2386 met our inclusion criteria (Percutaneous coronary intervention, n=1450; coronary artery bypass grafting, n=936). Propensity score analysis matched 628 patients, of which 468 were treated to the left anterior descending with coronary artery bypass grafting with LIMA (n=314), percutaneous coronary intervention with BMS (n=94), and DES (n=60). Coronary angiograms were analyzed by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA; n=433). Cumulative downstream coronary and conduit disease progression were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and effect of treatment type by Cox proportional hazard models. Patients treated with LIMA had significantly lower risk of downstream coronary disease progression at follow-up angiogram compared with BMS and DES (hazard ratio [HR] [95% CI], 0.34; [0.20-0.59]; P=0.0002; and HR [95% CI], 0.39; [0.20-0.79]; P=0.01, respectively). LIMA was associated with a lower risk of conduit disease progression compared to BMS and DES (HR [95% CI], 0.18; [0.12-0.28]; P<0.001; and HR [95% CI], 0.27; [0.16-0.46]; P<0.001, respectively). BMS was associated with higher HR for downstream coronary and conduit disease progression compared with DES, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (HR [95% CI], 1.13; [0.57-2.36]; P=0.73; and HR [95% CI], 1.46; [0.88-2.50]; P=0.14, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

LIMA grafting to left anterior descending is associated with significantly lower risk of downstream coronary and conduit disease progression compared to percutaneous coronary intervention with BMS and DES.