Stability and reliability of detection thresholds for human A-Beta and A-delta sensory afferents determined by cutaneous electrical stimulation

Activity in primary afferent fibers that usually mediate fine touch can evoke sensations of pain in conditions in which there is sensitization of central neurons. Input from these large diameter Abeta afferents may also sustain and exacerbate these central mechanisms. The role of these fibers in clinical pain syndromes can be evaluated by applications of electrical stimuli that preferentially activate Abeta axons. This study assessed the stability and reliability of a method of electrical stimulation (ES) useful for clinical evaluation. Monopolar constant-current rectangular pulses were delivered to 5 equi-spaced sites on the volar aspect of the left forearm along a transverse line 5 cm distal to the antecubital crease. Current intensity was gradually increased to determine detection threshold and pain detection threshold. This study determined: 1) Effect of pulse duration (1, 2, and 5 msec); 2) the variation of detection threshold and pain threshold over repeated stimulation; 3) the effect of electrode position with respect to distance from the trunk of underlying ulnar or median nerves; and 4) the effect of re-positioning the electrode on variability of detection threshold and pain threshold. There was no significant variability over time for either detection threshold (DT) or pain threshold (PT) at any of the 3 pulse durations tested. There was also no significant effect on variability of shifting the electrode between sites, nor was there a significant difference in variability between sites when placed either over or adjacent to peripheral nerves. Under simulated clinical conditions of electrode re-positioning, the mean detection threshold in 300 trials and ten subjects was 0.30 mA with an overall standard error of 0.007, standard errors of 0.014 over the 10 subjects, 0.003 over the 6 trials, and 0.012 over the 5 locations. Similarly, mean pain threshold in these 300 trials was 3.24 +/- 0.093, with standard errors of 0.12 over the 10 subjects, 0.023 over the 6 trials, and 0.13 over the 5 locations. Mean ratio of pain threshold divided by detection threshold ratio was 10.9 +/- 0.25 with a range of 2.0-28.3. Single pulse, constant current electrical stimulation of the skin at threshold levels is a quantifiable and reliable sensory method that is repeatable within and between testing sessions. Our results suggest that in skin unaffected by allodynia, a ratio of the two sensory thresholds (pain threshold and detection threshold) of less than 2.0 is uncommon. We propose that, in the presence of mechanical allodynia, a pain threshold/detection threshold of less than 2.0 suggests that altered central nervous system processing of Abeta input may contribute to allodynia.

Comparative study of electronic vs. paper VAS ratings: a randomized, crossover trial using healthy volunteers

The visual analogue scale (VAS) is an established, validated, self-report measure usually consisting of a 10 cm line on paper with verbal anchors labeling the ends. Palmtop computers (PTCs also known as personal digital appliances) have incorporated VAS entry by use of a touch screen. However, the validity and psychophysical properties of the electronic VAS have never been formally compared with the conventional paper VAS. The aim of this study is to determine the agreement between the electronic (eVAS) and paper (pVAS) modes. Twenty-four healthy volunteers were recruited for this study. Each study participant provided input using both measurement methods by marking the eVAS and pVAS in response to two kinds of stimuli, cognitive and sensory. A verbal rating scale of seven descriptors of intensity represented the cognitive stimuli. Participants were asked to mark the location that best corresponded to the pain intensity described by each word on scales from 'no pain' to 'worst possible pain'. The sensory stimuli used were a set of test weights consisting of plastic containers ranging from 7 to 129 g. The VAS for sensory stimuli ranged from 0 (no weight) to 'reference weight' (the heaviest weight outside the range of test weights). There were two types of input stimuli and two modes for recording responses for a total of four experimental conditions. Two evaluators independently measured and recorded all the pVAS forms to the nearest millimeter. A total of 2016 stimuli were rated. The overall correlation for ratings of both sensory and cognitive stimuli on eVAS and pVAS was r = 0.91. For paired verbal stimuli the correlation was r = 0.97. For paired sensory stimuli the correlation was r = 0.86. The correlation between group eVAS and pVAS ratings to common verbal stimuli was r = 0.99. For common sensory stimuli the group correlation was r = 0.99. The median of correlations comparing eVAS and pVAS ratings was 0.99 for verbal stimuli and 0.98 for sensory stimuli. Multivariate analyses showed equivalent stimuli to be rated much the same whether entered on paper VAS or PTC touch screen VAS (P < 0.0001). Support was found for the validity of the computer version of the VAS scale.

Functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence of augmented pain processing in fibromyalgia

OBJECTIVE

To use functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to evaluate the pattern of cerebral activation during the application of painful pressure and determine whether this pattern is augmented in patients with fibromyalgia (FM) compared with controls.

METHODS

Pressure was applied to the left thumbnail beds of 16 right-handed patients with FM and 16 right-handed matched controls. Each FM patient underwent fMRI while moderately painful pressure was being applied. The functional activation patterns in FM patients were compared with those in controls, who were tested under 2 conditions: the "stimulus pressure control" condition, during which they received an amount of pressure similar to that delivered to patients, and the "subjective pain control" condition, during which the intensity of stimulation was increased to deliver a subjective level of pain similar to that experienced by patients.

RESULTS

Stimulation with adequate pressure to cause similar pain in both groups resulted in 19 regions of increased regional cerebral blood flow in healthy controls and 12 significant regions in patients. Increased fMRI signal occurred in 7 regions common to both groups, and decreased signal was observed in 1 common region. In contrast, stimulation of controls with the same amount of pressure that caused pain in patients resulted in only 2 regions of increased signal, neither of which coincided with a region of activation in patients. Statistical comparison of the patient and control groups receiving similar stimulus pressures revealed 13 regions of greater activation in the patient group. In contrast, similar stimulus pressures produced only 1 region of greater activation in the control group.

CONCLUSION

The fact that comparable subjectively painful conditions resulted in activation patterns that were similar in patients and controls, whereas similar pressures resulted in no common regions of activation and greater effects in patients, supports the hypothesis that FM is characterized by cortical or subcortical augmentation of pain processing.

Diagnosing sensory abnormalities with either normal values or values from contralateral skin: comparison of two approaches in complex regional pain syndrome I

BACKGROUND

To diagnose sensory abnormalities, patient values can be compared with values of the general population (absolute approach) or to values measured at contralateral homologous skin (relative approach). The current study gives normal values for both approaches and compares the advantages of each method by applying the technique to patients with complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS I).

METHODS

In 50 healthy control subjects, sensory and pain thresholds were measured for pressure, warmth, and cold on both wrists and both feet. In 53 patients with unilateral CRPS I (33 hand, 20 foot), the same assessments were conducted twice, at an interval of 1 month.

RESULTS

In control subjects, contralateral homologous sides have approximately the same sensitivity, supporting the validity of the relative approach in patients. Hypoesthesia and allodynia can be diagnosed by either the absolute or relative approach, whereas hyperesthesia and hypoalgesia can only be identified with the relative approach. The two approaches obtain different results in 20% of cases. Age, gender, and subject criteria may influence the absolute but not the relative approach. Both approaches are comparable with regard to reproducibility. Frequency distributions of sensory abnormalities in chronic CRPS I are presented. The most frequent diagnoses were cold allodynia and mechanical hypoesthesia and allodynia.

CONCLUSIONS

To divide sensory characteristics into a binary classification of "normal" and "abnormal," the relative approach is the best choice, with the exception of cases in which the contralateral homologous side is absent or affected by disease. The authors recommend the relative approach for both research and clinical purposes.

Irritable bowel syndrome patients show altered sensitivity to exogenous opioids

Alterations in activation of pain modulation systems may play a role in the pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). However, little is known about the effects of exogenous opioids on the perceptual and autonomic responses to aversive visceral stimulation. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of the mu opioid-preferring analgesic fentanyl (FEN), given intravenously, on perceptual and autonomic responses to rectal distension. Ten IBS patients and ten normal subjects received, on separate days, either high dose (HD) fentanyl (112 microg bolus followed by 0.04 microg/kg per min infusion), low dose (LD) fentanyl (56 microg bolus followed by 0.02 microg/kg per min) or normal saline (SAL) (50 cc bolus followed by 45 cc/h infusion). Perception thresholds for discomfort and pain during rectal distension were assessed using a tracking paradigm. Intensity and unpleasantness ratings of the distensions, and cardiac autonomic parameters were assessed during randomly delivered rectal stimuli. Effects of FEN on rectal compliance and tone as well as mental status were also assessed. IBS patients had lower perceptual thresholds for discomfort and pain under control conditions. FEN dose-dependently increased the perception thresholds in both healthy control subjects and in IBS patients with a greater relative efficacy in IBS patients than in normal subjects. IBS patients used significantly higher unpleasantness ratings of rectal stimuli compared to healthy controls, but showed no difference in the sensory intensity rating of the stimulus. FEN decreased both intensity and unpleasantness ratings for IBS and normals. FEN lowered cardiosympathetic tone in normal subjects but had no effect on IBS patients. FEN had no effect on rectal tone or compliance. FEN dose-dependently attenuates the perception of phasic rectal distension and affects unpleasantness ratings during random fixed rectal distension, with a greater relative efficacy for this antinociceptive effect in IBS patients. These findings support the hypothesis that IBS patients may have an altered central release of endogenous opioids in response to visceral stimulation.

Pain measurement

Increasing evidence from laboratory methods in humans and animals indicates that pain arises from, and is modulated by, a number of mechanisms. In addition, these mechanisms are not static but change as pain persists. Recent human studies have demonstrated new aspects of pain processing at all levels of the central nervous system. Studies of the influence of analgesic agents on a large number of experimental pain measures have shown a preferential effect of opioids for attenuating the central integration of prolonged stimuli while local anesthetics may be more effective for brief stimulation. Studies of NK1 antagonists in man have shown results similar to those found with animals. There is little effect on brief stimulation of A delta and C-fiber nociceptors, including conditions that can evoke central summation. However, these antagonists, which block the effects of substance P, are effective in more persistent states such as postsurgical pain. Persistent pain can also alter the function of the large diameter A beta touch afferents, ranging from increased tactile sensitivity in inflammatory conditions to frank allodynia following nerve injury or focal nociceptor stimulation. Recent advances in evaluation of supraspinal pain processing in humans have demonstrated pain-related activation using both methods that assess synchronized neural activity and methods that infer this activity in the whole brain by local changes in regional cerebral blood flow. These methods have begun to identify brain regions associated with the multiple dimensions and processing of painful stimulation and the modulation of these processes by pharmacological agents and non-pharmacological interventions.

Tourniquet constriction exacerbates hyperalgesia-related pain induced by intradermal capsaicin injection

BACKGROUND

When capsaicin is injected intradermally, hyperalgesia develops around the injection site. The authors observed that volunteers report painful sensations in the skin remote from the injection site during tourniquet constriction of the affected extremity.

METHODS

Each volunteer received an intradermal injection of capsaicin on the volar forearm, followed by intermittent tourniquet constriction of the extremity. In some participants, the tourniquet position was rotated between different sites on the upper extremities. Laser Doppler measurements were made in the skin to measure capillary blood flow during pain magnification.

RESULTS

Hyperalgesia developed in the volunteers who were tested after the capsaicin injection. Blood flow increased three times in the dermal capillaries remote from the injection site after capsaicin injection. The tourniquet-induced pain reached peak intensity soon after tourniquet inflation. Tourniquet constriction of the arm on the affected side reliably induced painful exacerbation in each person tested. The quality of the sensation was described as burning and extended across the arm in most volunteers. Only when pinprick hyperalgesia was detectable did the volunteers experience the diffuse, immediate pain sensation. The pain initiated by the tourniquet constriction likely is related to changes in skin capillary blood flow.

CONCLUSIONS

Low cutaneous blood perfusion is related to the intensity of ongoing, spontaneous pain when secondary hyperalgesia is present. The specific trigger(s) have yet to be identified.

The cortical representation of pain

Anatomical and physiological studies in animals, as well as functional imaging studies in humans have shown that multiple cortical areas are activated by painful stimuli. The view that pain is perceived only as a result of thalamic processing has, therefore, been abandoned, and has been replaced by the question of what functions can be assigned to individual cortical areas. The following cortical areas have been shown to be involved in the processing of painful stimuli: primary somatosensory cortex, secondary somatosensory cortex and its vicinity in the parietal operculum, insula, anterior cingulate cortex and prefrontal cortex. These areas probably process different aspects of pain in parallel. Previous psychophysical research has emphasized the importance of separating pain experience into sensory-discriminative and affective-motivational components. The sensory-discriminative component of pain can be considered a sensory modality similar to vision or olfaction; it becomes more and more evident that it is subserved by its own apparatus up to the cortical level. The affective-motivational component is close to what may be considered 'suffering from pain'; it is clearly related to aspects of emotion, arousal and the programming of behaviour. This dichotomy, however, has turned out to be too simple to explain the functional significance of nociceptive cortical networks. Recent progress in imaging technology has, therefore, provided a new impetus to study the multiple dimensions of pain.

AMPA/kainate antagonist LY293558 reduces capsaicin-evoked hyperalgesia but not pain in normal skin in humans

BACKGROUND

Animal studies suggest that alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid-kainate (AMPA-KA) receptors are involved in pain processing. The effects of the competitive AMPA-KA antagonist LY293558 in two types of experimental pain in human volunteers, brief pain sensations in normal skin, and mechanical allodynia-pinprick hyperalgesia were studied after the injection of intradermal capsaicin.

METHODS

Brief intravenous infusions of the competitive AMPA-KA antagonist LY293558 were given to 25 healthy volunteers to examine acute toxicity and analgesic effects. Fifteen volunteers then entered a double-blinded, three-period crossover study. In a Phase II study, LY293558 infusions (100% maximally tolerated dose vs. 33% maximally tolerated dose vs. placebo) began 10 min after intradermal injection of 250 microg capsaicin in volar forearm. Spontaneous pain, areas of mechanical allodynia and pinprick hyperalgesia, and side effects were determined every 5 min for 60 min.

RESULTS

The median maximally tolerated dose was 1.3 +/- 0.4 (range, 0.9-2.0) mg/kg. Tests of cognitive and neurological function were unchanged. Dose-limiting side effects were hazy vision in 95% of volunteers and sedation in 40%. There were no significant changes in electrical or warm-cool detection and pain thresholds or heat pain thresholds. LY293558 had little effect on brief pain sensations in normal skin. Both high and low doses of LY293558 significantly reduced pain intensity, pain unpleasantness, and the area in which light brush evoked pain after intradermal capsaicin. There was a trend toward a dose-response effect of LY293558 on the area in which pinprick evoked pain after intradermal capsaicin, which did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors infer that AMPA-KA receptor blockade reduces the spinal neuron sensitization that mediates capsaicin-evoked pain and allodynia. The low incidence of side effects at effective doses of LY293558 suggests that this class of drugs may prove to be useful in clinical pain states.

The meaning of pain: cancer patients' rating and recall of pain intensity and affect

The present study investigated the influence of an increase in present pain intensity on the rating and recall of the intensity and affective dimensions of clinical pain. Thirty-two cancer patients who reported that movement caused or exacerbated their pain rated their present pain intensity and affect before and after a session of physical therapy. Subjects also rated their usual, highest and lowest pain intensity and pain affect for the previous 3 days, and were randomly assigned to make these ratings either before or after the physical therapy session. Physical therapy increased the intensity (P < 0.01) but not the unpleasantness of the pain (P > 0.05), thus demonstrating a dissociation between pain intensity and pain affect. Beliefs about pain etiology also influenced post-therapy pain ratings. Subjects (N = 11) who believed that their pain was due to cancer, rated their post-therapy pain intensity and pain affect significantly higher than those subjects (N = 21) who did not believe their pain was due to cancer (both P < 0.05). For all subjects, recall of past pain intensity and affect was positively correlated with present levels of pain intensity and pain affect (P < 0.01). Thus, recall was assimilated to present pain levels. The results demonstrate the importance of rating both the intensity and affective dimensions of pain, and suggest that the significance of clinical pain influences pain ratings. These results also suggest that research on the rating and recall of pain, particularly the affective dimension of pain, should use actual patients who are experiencing changes in their naturally occurring pain.

The substance P receptor antagonist CP-99,994 reduces acute postoperative pain

BACKGROUND

Animal studies suggest that substance P, a peptide that preferentially activates the neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptor, is involved in pain transmission, with particular importance in pain after inflammation.

METHODS

The analgesic efficacy of CP-99,994, a NK1 receptor antagonist, was compared with ibuprofen and placebo in 78 subjects undergoing third molar extraction. The initial 60 subjects randomly received 1 of 3 possible treatments in a double-blind fashion before oral surgery: 750 microg/kg CP-99,994 infused intravenously over 5 hours on a tapering regimen starting 2 hours before surgery, 600 mg oral ibuprofen 30 minutes before surgery, or placebo. In a second study, 18 subjects were randomized to the same regimens starting 30 minutes before surgery to maximize the amount of CP-99,994 circulating during pain onset.

RESULTS

In the first study, ibuprofen significantly reduced pain, as measured by visual analog scale, from 90 to 240 minutes postoperatively compared with placebo. CP-99,994 produced analgesia that was significant at 90 minutes (P < 0.01 compared with placebo), but not at subsequent time points. In the second study, ibuprofen and, to a lesser extent, CP-99,994 significantly suppressed pain in comparison to placebo at 60, 90, and 120 minutes (P < 0.05). The incidence of side effects was similar across groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This replicate demonstration that a NK1 receptor blocker relieves clinical pain supports the hypothesis that substance P contributes to the generation of pain in humans. The reduction in postoperative pain at doses not producing side effects suggests that NK1 antagonists may be clinically useful.

Reorganization of sensory modalities evoked by microstimulation in region of the thalamic principal sensory nucleus in patients with pain due to nervous system injury

Stimulation of the somatosensory system is more likely to evoke pain in patients with chronic pain after nervous system injury than in patients without somatosensory abnormalities. We now describe results of stimulation through a microelectrode at microampere thresholds (threshold microstimulation; TMIS) in the region of the human thalamic principal sensory nucleus (ventral caudal; Vc) during operations for treatment of movement disorders or of chronic pain. Patients were trained preoperatively to use a standard questionnaire to describe the location (projected field) and quality of sensations evoked by TMIS intraoperatively. The region of Vc was divided on the basis of projected fields into areas representing the part of the body where the patients experienced chronic pain (pain affected) or did not experience chronic pain (pain unaffected) and into a control area located in the thalamus of patients with movement disorders and no experience of chronic pain. The region of the Vc was also divided into a core region and a posterior-inferior region. The core was defined as the region above a standard radiologic horizontal line (anterior commissure-posterior commissure line; ACPC line) where the majority of cells responded to innocuous somatosensory stimulation. The posterior-inferior area was a cellular area posterior and inferior to the core. In both the core and the posterior-inferior regions, the proportion of sites where TMIS evoked pain was larger in pain-affected and unaffected areas than in control areas. The number of sites where thermal (warm or cold) sensations were evoked was correspondingly smaller, so that the total of pain-plus-thermal (sensation of warmth or cold) sites was the same in all areas. Therefore, sites pain where stimulation evoked pain in patients with neuropathic pain (i.e., pain following an injury to the nervous system) may correspond to sites where thermal sensations were evoked by stimulation in patients without somatosensory abnormality.

Sensory changes in the territory of the lingual and inferior alveolar nerves following lower third molar extraction

Post-injury inflammation activates nociceptive systems and recruits normally non-nociceptive afferents into a pain processing role. During inflammation, Abeta low threshold mechanoreceptor afferents that usually mediate tactile sensation acquire properties of nociceptors, allowing them to participate in post-injury spontaneous pain and evoked abnormalities such as tenderness and pain to light touch. This study assessed the sensory consequences of post-injury inflammation following extraction of a single, lower third molar tooth. Extensive bilateral evaluations were performed in the territory of nerves assumed to be exposed to both inflammation and mechanical trauma, inflammation alone, or only the central consequences of peripheral inflammation. Testing at the distal termination of nerves assumed to be exposed to local inflammation (mental and lingual nerve territory) revealed decreased detection thresholds (P < 0.05) to electrical stimulation and to mechanical stimulation by sensitive, disposable filaments developed and validated for this application. Testing at sites of assumed inflammation and mechanical trauma (mental nerve territory) showed reduced pain thresholds to electrical stimulation. Thermal detection and pain thresholds were not altered at any location in patients, and no effects were observed in control subjects receiving only local anesthetic injections. These results in humans are consistent with recent experimental evidence that inflammatory processes alter the central consequence of activity in large-diameter Abeta touch primary afferents evoked under natural conditions by gentle mechanical stimulation. These effects result in hyperesthesia, increased sensitivity to light touch, and mechanical allodynia, pain evoked by normally innocuous stimulation of Abeta primary afferents.

The human capsaicin model of allodynia and hyperalgesia: sources of variability and methods for reduction

Intradermal and topical application of capsaicin have been used to study mechanisms of mechanical allodynia (MA) and pinprick hyperalgesia (PPH) and the efficacy of drugs in relieving these symptoms. However, it is associated with significant inter- and intra-subject variability. In order to improve the model's sensitivity, we examined several potential sources of variability of capsaicin-evoked MA and PPH in healthy volunteers, including skin temperature fluctuations, method (intradermal vs. topical) and site (volar forearm vs. foot dorsum) of administration. In study I, 12 subjects received, in a 6-session, randomized, crossover trial, 1) 250 micrograms of intradermal (ID) CAP to the volar forearm with skin temperature fixed at 36 degrees C (36 ID). 2) 250 micrograms ID CAP with varying skin temperature (VT ID), or 3) 250 microliters of l% CAP patch placed on the skin at 36 degrees C. The resulting MA and PPH areas observed with each method were measured. In study II, a 4-session, randomized crossover trial, 12 subjects were given 100 micrograms ID CAP in the volar forearm or foot dorsum and subsequent areas of MA and PPH recorded. In study I, 5/12 subjects had small MA areas (< or = 5 cm2) and one subject had small PPH areas in at least 4/6 sessions. The most consistent intra-subject responses were seen with the 36 ID method. Correlation coefficients for the two sessions using the same method of administration were: MA; 36 ID r = 0.83, VT ID = 0.19. Topical r = 0.81; PPH: 36 ID r = 0.93; VT ID r = 0.38, Topical r = 0.78. In study II, 4/12 subjects had little MA for both forearm and foot though all subjects developed PPH. However, greater intra-subject consistency (MA: foot: r = 0.84; arm: r = 0.49; PPH: r = 0.87; r = 0.39) and significantly larger areas of MA (15.8 +/- 4.2 vs 9.1 +/- 2.5, p < 0.05) were seen with the foot. (PPH: foot: 28.9 +/- 6.7; arm: 21.6 +/- 4.2, NS). Large variability exists among subjects receiving CAP, with some developing minimal MA. However, these subjects may be screened out prior to entry, increasing the sensitivity of the model, which may be further improved by clamping the skin temperature.

Neural activation during acute capsaicin-evoked pain and allodynia assessed with PET

The PET H2 15O-bolus method was used to image regional brain activity in normal human subjects during intense pain induced by intradermal injection of capsaicin and during post-capsaicin mechanical allodynia (the perception of pain from a normally non-painful stimulus). Images of regional cerebral blood flow were acquired during six conditions: (i) rest; (ii) light brushing of the forearm; (iii) forearm intradermal injection of capsaicin, (iv) and (v) the waning phases of capsaicin pain; and (vi) allodynia. Allodynia was produced by light brushing adjacent to the capsaicin injection site after ongoing pain from the capsaicin injection had completely subsided. Capsaicin treatment produced activation in many discrete brain regions which we classified as subserving four main functions: sensation-perception (primary somatosensory cortex, thalamus and insula); attention (anterior cingulate cortex); descending pain control (periaqueductal grey); and an extensive network related to sensory-motor integration (supplementary motor cortex, bilateral putamen and insula, anterior lobe and vermis of the cerebellum and superior colliculus). Comparison of the noxious and non-noxious stimuli yielded several new insights into neural organization of pain and tactile sensations. Capsaicin pain, which had no concomitant tactile component, produced little or no activation in secondary somatosensory cortex (SII), whereas light brushing produced a prominent activation of SII, suggesting a differential sensitivity of SII to tactile versus painful stimuli. The cerebellar vermis was strongly activated by capsaicin, whereas light brush and experimental allodynia produced little or no activation, suggesting a selective association with C-fibre stimulation and nociceptive second-order spinal neurons. The experimental allodynia activated a network that partially overlapped those activated by both pain and light brush alone. Unlike capsaicin-induced pain, allodynia was characterized by bilateral activation of inferior prefrontal cortex, suggesting that prefrontal responses to pain are context dependent.

Competition alters the perception of noxious stimuli in male and female athletes

The ability of athletes to continue to compete despite sustaining painful injury is often interpreted as evidence for the activation of endogenous analgesia mechanisms. However, alterations in perception of noxious stimuli during competition have not yet been systematically investigated. This experiment evaluated experimental pain sensitivity in male and female athletes 2 days before, immediately following, and 2 days after competition. Non-athlete controls were evaluated at the same intervals. Competition dramatically reduced pain report on the cold-pressor test in all athletes. Withdrawal latencies to noxious heat also were altered by competition, with finger withdrawal latency decreasing and arm withdrawal latency increasing in most athletes. No changes in pain report were observed across time in non-athlete controls. Competition induces both hyperalgesic and analgesic states that are dependent on the body region tested and pain assessment methodology used.

Controlled trial of ketorolac in tension-type headache

Intramuscular ketorolac 60 mg, meperidine 50 mg plus promethazine 25 mg, and normal saline were compared in acute exacerbations of tension-type headache. Forty-one subjects (30 females and 11 males) were randomized into three groups and evaluated by the McGill Short-Form Pain Questionnaire before treatment, and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours after treatment. All three groups showed a significant treatment effect that persisted for the 6 hours of evaluation. Ketorolac treatment was significantly better than placebo at 0.5 and 1 hour by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Pain Rating Index, and better than meperidine at 2 hours (by the VAS). Meperidine and placebo did not differ at any time point. Ketorolac is effective in short-term treatment of tension-type headache.

Evidence for two distinct perceptual alterations in irritable bowel syndrome

BACKGROUND

Visceral hyperalgesia has been implicated as a factor contributing to symptom generation in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). However, previous studies using intestinal balloon distension have used psychophysical procedures which do not provide adequate and unbiased measures of visceral sensitivity.

METHODS

Three psychophysical tasks were examined in 45 patients with IBS (positive Rome criteria) and 14 controls using rectal balloon distension with a computerised distension device. Discomfort threshold and tolerance were assessed during an ascending series of phasic pressure stimuli and during an interactive threshold tracking procedure. In addition, stimulus response functions were generated from intensity and unpleasantness ratings of the rectal distensions.

RESULTS

Discomfort threshold and tolerance for the ascending stimuli were significantly lower for the patients with IBS compared with the controls. In contrast, discomfort thresholds during the tracking procedure and stimulus response curves for the ascending series were not different between the groups. A factor analysis of the psychophysical data was consistent with the presence of two distinct and unrelated perceptual alterations related to rectal distension: hypervigilance for visceral stimuli, manifested as lowered response criteria for using the descriptor "discomfort"; and rectal hypersensitivity, manifested as a lower discomfort threshold and left shift of the stimulus response curves.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with IBS as a group have a greater propensity to label visceral sensations negatively and show a lower tolerance for rectal balloon distension. A subgroup of patients also have baseline rectal hypersensitivity, assessed by unbiased measures of discomfort threshold and stimulus intensity judgements.

Human thalamic nucleus mediating taste and multiple other sensations related to ingestive behavior

Until now, taste was the only primary sensory modality for which the human central nervous system pathways were unknown. We report sensations evoked by stimulation at microampere current levels in the region of the human thalamic nucleus (ventralis caudalis parvocellularis internis) corresponding to the monkey taste relay nucleus. Stimulation in this region during awake neurosurgical procedures evoked special visceral/somatic (taste/pungent smell), general visceral (fullness of a hollow viscus), as well as painful and nonpainful general somatic sensations. General somatic or visceral sensation was evoked by stimulation at 80% of sites where special visceral/somatic sensation was evoked. These results suggest that primate taste relay mediates multiple sensations in addition to taste.

NGF involvement in pain induced by chronic constriction injury of the rat sciatic nerve

Chronic constriction injury (CCI) of the rat sciatic nerve, which within 3 days induces thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia and mechanical allodynia, is used as a model for pain resulting from nerve injury. Involvement of nerve growth factor (NGF) in the development of this hyperalgesia is suggested by the increase in the level of mRNA encoding NGF in cells in the injured area and in dorsal root ganglia at the level of the lesion and the greatly increased NGF levels (determined by ELISA) in the ganglia ipsilateral to the CCI. Application of anti-serum to NGF at the site of CCI delayed the appearance of hyperalgesia, whereas pre-immune serum appeared to enhance it. These results are consistent with the view that NGF is an important factor in the appearance of hyperalgesia associated with unilateral mononeuropathy.

Influence of a sympathomimetic amine on masticatory and trapezius pain/pressure thresholds and electromyographic levels

OBJECTIVES

This study examined the influence of terbutaline, a beta-adrenergic sympathomimetic amine on pain/pressure thresholds in the index fingers and masseter and trapezius muscles and electromyographic activity in trapezii.

STUDY DESIGN

In a randomized and double-blind controlled trial, 20 asymptomatic female subjects were assigned to receive either an injection of terbutaline or sterile water before collection of pain/pressure thresholds and electromyographic levels. Repeated analysis of variance and paired t tests were calculated to test for baseline and postinjection differences between groups.

RESULTS

No significant baseline or postinjection group differences in pain/pressure thresholds or electromyographic were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

beta-adrenergic sympathomimetic stimulation does not influence pain/pressure thresholds or electromyographic activity in the masselet and trapezius muscles or pain/pressure thresholds in the index fingers. These results suggest that development of painful muscle conditions is not caused by elevations of sympathetic activity.

Capsaicin-evoked mechanical allodynia and hyperalgesia cross nerve territories. Evidence for a central mechanism

BACKGROUND

The finding in some patients with neuropathic pain that mechanical allodynia (pain evoked by light touch) and hyperalgesia (supranormal pain evoked by painful stimuli) extend beyond the territory of a single nerve or spinal sensory root (extraterritorial pain) often prompts a diagnosis of psychiatric illness. The hypothesis that focal nociceptive input in a single nerve territory can result in allodynia and hyperalgesia in a nerve territory adjacent to the input was investigated in normal human subjects.

METHODS

On separate days, 13 healthy volunteers each received left radial and ulnar nerve blocks. After block of either nerve, sensation remaining for three classes of afferents (A beta low-threshold mechanoreceptors, A delta nociceptors, and C polymodal nociceptors) allowed inference of the nerve territory of the adjacent nerve, and the area of overlapping innervation. On a third day, 1,000 micrograms intradermal capsaicin was administered into a site such that C-nociceptor input was confined to the ulnar nerve territory. Areas of brush allodynia and pinprick hyperalgesia were determined.

RESULTS

Spread of brush allodynia beyond all three borders of the ulnar nerve territory occurred in 9 of 13 patients (for these subjects, range 5-28 mm), whereas spread of pinprick hyperalgesia beyond all borders of the ulnar nerve territory occurred in 12 of 13 subjects (range 1-31 mm). Spread of brush allodynia beyond the A beta border of the ulnar nerve territory occurred in 10 of 13 subjects (range 4-35 mm); and spread of pinprick hyperalgesia beyond the A delta border of the ulnar nerve territory occurred in 12 of 13 subjects (range 1-31 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

It is concluded that activation of C-nociceptors evokes a state of central sensitization that may manifest itself by the appearance of extraterritorial pain abnormalities.

The placebo effect in acute headache management: ketorolac, meperidine, and saline in the emergency department

In a prospective, double-blind, randomized study, ketorolac 60 mg, meperidine 50 mg plus promethazine 25 mg, and normal saline given by intramuscular injection were compared as treatment for acute headache crises. Thirty patients (6 men and 24 women) presenting to an urban emergency department with any type of benign headache were randomized into three groups and filled out the McGill Short-Form Pain Questionnaire with a Pain Rating Index and a Visual Analogue Pain scale. They received one of the study medications and repeated the testing after 1 hour. The objective was to test the efficacy of ketorolac in this population. Separate analyses of the McGill Short-Form (Total, Sensory, Affective, and Pain Rating Index scales) and the Visual Analogue Pain scale responses showed that the three treatments produced a significant reduction in pain (P < .0001), but that pain reduction did not differ among the treatments. This profound reduction observed after administration of a placebo prevented accurate evaluation of the effects of ketorolac. The placebo response must be considered in the design of future trials using intramuscular medications in the acute intervention of headache crises. In addition, the use of a standard analgesic is necessary to demonstrate both assay sensitivity and magnitude of response to placebo.