Prognostic impact of active mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: results from the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial

Background

Active mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices are increasingly used in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, data derived from randomized controlled trials on the efficacy and safety of these devices are still limited.

Purpose

To analyze the prognostic impact of active MCS devices in a large prospective contemporary cohort of patients with CS complicating AMI.

Methods

This is a predefined subanalysis of the Culprit Lesion Only PCI versus Multivessel PCI in Cardiogenic Shock (CULPRIT-SHOCK) randomized trial and prospective registry. Patients with CS, AMI and multivessel coronary artery disease were categorized in two groups; (1) use of at least one active MCS device, vs. (2) no active MCS or use of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) only. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death or need of renal replacement therapy at 30 days.

Results

Two hundred of 1055 (19%) patients received at least one active MCS device (n=112 Impella®; n=95 extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [ECMO]; n=6 other devices). The primary endpoint occurred significantly more often in patients treated with active MCS devices compared to those without active MCS devices (142 of 197, 72% vs. 374 of 827, 45%; p<0.001). All-cause mortality at 30 days and 1 year as well as bleeding rates were significantly higher in the active MCS group (all p<0.001). After multivariable adjustment the use of active MCS was significantly associated with the primary endpoint (odds ratio [OR] 4.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.7–5.9; p<0.001).

Conclusion

In the CULPRIT-SHOCK randomized trial and prospective registry approximately one fifth of patients was treated with active MCS devices. Compared to patients without active MCS, patients treated with active MCS devices showed worse outcome at 30 days and 1 year.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – EU funding. Main funding source(s): Supported by a grant (FP7/2007-2013) from the European Union 7th Framework Program and by the German Heart Research Foundation and the German Cardiac Society.

Impact of pre-hospital resuscitation on short-and long-term mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock and multivessel disease. Results of the CULPRIT trial

Background

There are only a few prospective data on the outcome of patients with cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) admitted with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock and an invasive strategy including primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Therefore, we evaluated the impact of pre-hospital CPR on outcomes in a large group of patients with AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Methods

We used the data of the prospective CULPRIT-Shock trial and registry and including patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality or renal replacement therapy.

Results

Between 2013 and 2017, a total of 1055 patients were included in the randomized trial (n=686) and in the registry (n=369), 550 (54%) had CPR, 40 had no information regarding CPR. Baseline characteristics, procedural features and outcomes in the two groups with and without CPR are given in the table.

Conclusion

Patients with pre-hospital CPR represent more than half of the population with AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock. They are younger, have less risk factors and more often LAD as infarct vessel. Despite the younger age and a high success rate of PCI patients with CPR have a high 30-day mortality.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Deutsches Zentrum fuer Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung - DZHK

Skin cancer risk and shade: comparing the risk of foresters with other outdoor workers

BACKGROUND

Keratinocyte carcinoma (KC) is an increasingly important public health problem with an especially high prevalence in outdoor workers. In contrast to other occupations, foresters spend most of their outdoor time under the shade of trees.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to compare the unique sun exposure patterns and sun protection behaviour of foresters with those of other outdoor workers and their relation to the KC risk.

METHODS

In July 2018, a cross-sectional study was conducted at an international forestry fair using a questionnaire about health awareness and skin cancer screening by dermatologists to assess the prevalence of KC.

RESULTS

A total of 591 participants (78.7% male; mean age 46.8 ± 16.2 years) including 193 foresters were enrolled. Of all foresters, 72% experienced sunburns (solar erythema) within the past year and 50% of them experienced the worst sunburn during work. Foresters were most likely to often/always wear protective clothes (29.0%) but were least likely to often/always avoid midday sun (23.8%) and stay in the shade (31.1%). Having an outdoor profession or spending hours outside for leisure was negatively associated with sun protection. Skin examination revealed an overall KC prevalence of 16.7%, with 16.5% of foresters being affected.

CONCLUSION

Despite being protected by trees, the risk of KC for foresters is comparable to that of other professional groups. Shade alone may not provide sufficient protection. Additional sun protection measures are necessary.

HoSAGE: Sarcopenia in Older Patients before and after Treatment with Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND

Sarcopenia is a muscle disease defined by a loss of muscle strength associated to a decrease in skeletal muscle mass. In addition to aging, many factors may contribute to sarcopenia as cancer and/or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study are to describe the prevalence of sarcopenia in older prostate cancer patients before initiation of treatment with ADT and radiotherapy, and to evaluate the impact of ADT on the occurrence or aggravation of sarcopenia in this population.

DESIGN

longitudinal study.

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING

Sarcopenia was prospectively evaluated in 31 consecutive patients aged 70 to 88 years, referred in one hospital unit of south eastern France, for a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) before cancer treatment initiation.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

CGA, measures of muscle strength and physical performances were performed at baseline (T0) and at the end of cancer treatment (T1). Appendicular skeletal muscle mass was measured by Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the end of treatment. At T0, 8 patients (among 31) had a probable sarcopenia according to European consensus, and 18 had altered physical performance. At T1, 15 patients (among 19) had abnormal one leg balance test. Finally, only one patient had a sarcopenia confirmed by DXA.

CONCLUSION

This preliminary study showed a high prevalence of muscle disorders before initiation of ADT in a population of elderly cancer prostate patients with intermediate frailty status, and an increased risk of falls at the end of ADT. This highlighted the importance of screening for sarcopenia before treatment initiation, to prevent the occurrence or aggravation of sarcopenia by possible adjustment of treatment, and implementation of appropriate exercise and nutrition interventions.

Higher dose of resveratrol elevated cardiovascular disease risk biomarker levels in overweight older adults - A pilot study

Older adults are at high risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD). Pre-clinical studies indicate that resveratrol (RSV), a polyphenol commonly found in grapes and red wine, may help prevent development of CVD. Based on our previous reports where the 300 mg and 1000 mg doses appeared safe and improved psychomotor function in a dose-dependent manner, our hypothesis was that RSV would reduce biomarkers of CVD risk in overweight, but otherwise healthy older adults and that 1000 mg would lower CVD biomarkers >300 mg. This analysis was performed on samples from older participants (65 years and older) who were randomized to a 90 day RSV treatment with 300 mg (n = 10), 1000 mg (n = 9) or placebo (n = 10). We measured levels of CVD risk biomarkers i.e. oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL), soluble E-selectin-1 (sE-selectin), soluble Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 (sICAM-1), Soluble Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 (sVCAM-1), total plasminogen activator inhibitor (tPAI-1). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Both sVCAM-1 and tPAI increased significantly more in the 1000 mg vs. 300 mg and placebo groups. Other biomarkers (300 mg vs. 1000 mg vs. placebo: oxLDL, sEselectin-1 and sICAM-1) followed the same trend toward higher levels in the 1000 mg group compared to the 300 mg and placebo groups, without reaching statistical significance. This pilot project suggests that a higher dose of RSV may increase the levels of CVD risk biomarkers in overweight older adults. Given no change in the CVD risk biomarkers in response to a lower dose, future studies should test the effects of different doses of RSV to evaluate potential detrimental effects of higher doses on CVD biomarkers and measures of cardiovascular function in older adults at risk for CVD.

Does sunscreen use comply with official recommendations? Results of a nationwide survey in Germany

BACKGROUND

The use of sunscreen can reduce the risk of UV-induced skin lesions. Health authorities have provided recommendations for the correct use of sunscreen use: Sufficient amount of sunscreen should be applied at least 30 min before the sun exposure and should be reapplied every 2 h.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to research the practice of sunscreen use in a population-based and representative sample in Germany.

METHODS

For this cross-sectional survey, 3000 German residents aged 14-45 years were surveyed in standardized telephone interviews in 2018. Survey participants provided data on the frequency of sunscreen use in summer, timing of (re-)application and their skin characteristics. The data were weighted by age, sex, educational level and federal state to ensure the national representativeness of the sample.

RESULTS

Overall, 79.4% of respondents used sunscreen always, often or sometimes when being exposed to the sun. However, 87.2% of sunscreen users did not follow the recommendations on timing of application, 59.5% did not comply with the timing of reapplication. We also saw, that people potentially used too little sunscreen. These data did not differ noticeably by skin types of participants.

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed deficits in use of sunscreen in Germany, indicating that people here pay little attention to the recommendations of health authorities, regardless of their skin type. There is therefore an urgent need for targeted public information on this issue. Improving public knowledge on correct sunscreen use through educational campaigns or individual counselling by health professionals could be a first step.

P5630Morphometric and qualitative differences in neointimal tissue six months after implantation of bioresorbable scaffolds versus conventional everolimus eluting stents in ISAR-Absorb MI trial

Background

Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) are novel devices designed to overcome the long-term limitations of permanent metallic stent implantation. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) surveillance can provide important insights on the process of vessel wall healing at follow-up.

Purpose

We sought to compare OCT-assessed healing at 6 months after implantation of everolimus-eluting BRS and everolimus-eluting metallic stents (EES) in patients treated for acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Methods

ISAR-Absorb MI is a multicentre, 2:1 randomized trial comparing outcomes of patients with AMI stented with BRS or conventional EES. Angiographic surveillance was planned for all patients at 6–8 months follow-up. Patients who had OCT surveillance at follow-up were included for the present analysis. Analysis of contiguous OCT cross-sections- 1 mm apart was performed at a centralized core laboratory. Tissue characterisation using a 256-level grey-scale signal intensity (GSI) analysis was also performed for all neointimal regions of interest (ROI) with thickness of 100 to 400 μm. ROI's were classified as mature using a standard cut-off GSI score of 109.7. Generalised linear mixed model (GLMM) was used as appropriate. Statistical analysis was performed using R software. Data is presented as numbers, percentages or median (Interquartile range, IQR).

Results

Median follow-up interval was 216 days. 70 patients in the BRS arm and 33 patients in the EES arm were available for analysis. Stented length was 19.8 mm (13.6, 24.5) and 22.3 mm (16.7, 26.4) in BRS and EES arms respectively (p=0.73). Minimum lumen area [5.13 (3.95, 6.71) vs. 4.83 (3.63, 6.92) mm2] and minimum stent area [5.78 (4.88, 7.34) vs. 6.36 (4.70, 7.45) mm2] were comparable between BRS and EES.

2,262 frames (1,529 in BRS, 733 in EES) with 20,033 struts (12,704 in BRS, 7,329 in EES) were assessed. Overall strut coverage was better with BRS compared to EES (97.5% vs. 91.1% respectively, p<0.001). Malapposed (1.1% vs. 0.5%, p=0.54) and uncovered struts (7.3% vs. 1.3%, p<0.001) were more common with EES. Neointimal coverage was comparable amongst both stent groups [85.5 (61.9, 124.1) vs. 71.5 (33.4, 133.0) μm in BRS and EES groups respectively, p=0.50].

GSI analysis in 95 cases (65 cases, 2,233 ROIs in BRS; 30 cases, 1,210 ROIs in EES) showed that immature ROIs were numerically more common in the EES group as compared to the BRS group (75.4 vs. 57.0% respectively; p=0.35).

Two-year clinical follow-up and analysis of correlation of clinical outcomes with OCT findings will also be available for presentation at ESC Congress 2019.

Conclusions

In selected patients undergoing OCT imaging at 6–8 months after implantation of BRS and conventional EES for AMI, we observed generally favourable healing characteristics with high rates of strut coverage, low rates of strut malapposition and fewer areas of immature neointimal areas with BRS in comparison to EES.

Acknowledgement/Funding

The study was predominantly funded by Deutsches Herzzentrum München and in part by a grant from Abbott Vascular

P2809Comparison between treatment of “established” versus complex “off-label” coronary lesions with Absorb bioresorbable scaffold implantation: results from the GABI-R registry

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients treated with bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) for off-label versus approved indications.

Background

The BRS promised some advantages in terms of complete biodegradation, however, the implication of BRS for off-label indications is not well described.

Methods

The short- and long-term outcome after implantation of a bioresorbable scaffold system (ABSORB, Abbott Vascular, USA) was evaluated in the prospective, non-interventional, multicenter real-world German-Austrian ABSORB RegIstRy (GABI-R).

Results

A total of 3,188 patients were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups: on-label BRS use (33.0%) and off-label use (66.9%) if at least one off-label use criteria was met. The incidence of scaffold thrombosis in confirmed cases was significantly higher in off-label group (1.36% vs. 0.57%, p=0.04; OR 2.41 (95% CI: 1.00–5.82) with also a trend towards higher myocardial infarction rate (2.39% vs. 1.42%, p=0.077; OR 1.70 (95% CI: 0.95–3.03) and cardiovascular death (1.27% vs. 1.14%, p=0.76, OR 1.11 (95% CI: 0.56–2.21) at 6 months follow up.

Clinical outcome at 6 months Total Off-label On-label p-value* OR (95%-CI) Patients with 6m FU record 99.0% 99.0% 99.1% 0.82 0.92 (0.43–1.95) Confirmed cardiovascular death 1.22% 1.27% 1.14% 0.76 1.11 (0.56–2.21) Confirmed non-cardiovascular death 0.22% 0.14% 0.38% 0.18 0.37 (0.08–1.66) Cause unknown 0.22% 0.28% 0.09% 0.29 2.97 (0.36–24.73) Hospitalisation 27.5% 27.9% 26.7% 0.51 1.06 (0.89–1.27) MI 2.07% 2.39% 1.42% 0.07 1.70 (0.95–3.03) ARC definite scaffold thrombosis 1.10% 1.36% 0.57% 0.04 2.41 (1.00–5.82) TLF 2.70% 3.00% 2.09% 0.13 1.45 (0.89–2.37) TVF 3.98% 4.31% 3.32% 0.18 1.31 (0.88–1.95) MACE 4.33% 4.64% 3.70% 0.22 1.27 (0.87–1.85) Values are mean ± standard deviation (SD) or number and percentage (n, %). *Comparison between off-label and on-label use. The p-values are from Chi-squared test or Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test. ARC, academic research consortium; FU, follow up; MACE, major adverse cardiac events; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; TLF, target lesion failure; TVF, target vessel failure.

Kaplan-Meyer curve stent thrombosis

Conclusions

The off-label use of BRS compared to confirmed indications appears to be associated with a higher rate of clinical endpoints considering more complex lesions and higher morbidity in this patients' group.

Acknowledgement/Funding

This research was supported by a grant from Abbott Vascular.

P3727Left atrial appendage closure in patients with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: results from the prospective multicenter German LAARGE registry

Background and purpose

Atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with increased thromboembolic risk and contraindications for standard oral anticoagulation (OAC) can profit from an interventional left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). While impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is associated with an increased thromboembolic risk in AF patients, cardiac interventions are often associated with an increase in complications in this patient population, and, therefore, the LAAC procedure's success and benefit has yet to be investigated in this subgroup.

Methods

This prospective, observational LAAC registry included 622 patients with documented LVEF from 37 German centers between April 2014 and January 2016. Patients were categorized into one of three groups: LVEF >55% (preserved; p), LVEF 35–55% (mid-range; mr) and LVEF <35% (reduced; r). Procedure was conducted in a standard fashion, and baseline characteristics, imaging as well as procedural data, intra-hospital and one-year follow-up outcome were registered for each group.

Results

55.3% of patients had a pLVEF, 38.7% a mrLVEF and 5.9% a rLVEF. Patients with rLVEF were more often affected by coronary artery disease (p<0.001 for trend), and had an elevated CHA2DS2-VASc (4.3±1.5 vs. 4.8±1.5 vs. 5.3±1.6; p<0.001) and HAS-BLED score (3.7±1.1 vs. 4.1±1.2 vs. 4.3±0.9; p<0.001). Percentage of prior cerebrovascular events and major bleedings was comparable at baseline (each p=n.s.). Procedural success was high (97.9%), while rates of intra-hospital MACCE (0.5%) and other major complications (4.2%) were low, with no significant difference between the groups (each p=n.s.). MACCE during follow-up was more frequent in rLVEF patients (11.0 vs. 11.3 vs. 27.8%; p=0.013), which was mainly driven by myocardial infarctions and all-cause deaths in this high risk collective. Likewise, Kaplan-Meier estimation showed a lower overall survival in this group (89.7 vs. 89.3 vs. 74.6%; p<0.01). On the contrary, rates of stroke were extremely low across all groups and statistically similar (0.3 vs. 1.0 vs. 0%; p=n.s.). This was 93.4, 82.7 and 100.0% less in comparison to the estimated risk calculated from the CHA2DS2-VASc score

Conclusions

The LVEF had no influence on the procedural success as well as the intra-hospital complications after LAAC. Annual rate of stroke was low across all groups, and risk reduction was substantial especially in this high risk collective, as compared to the estimated risk.

Acknowledgement/Funding

Stiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung, Ludwigshafen, Germany

P3724Impact of chronic kidney disease on efficacy and safety of interventional left atrial appendage closure – results from the prospective multicenter LAARGE registry

Background

The interventional left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an effective and safe alternative to standard oral anticoagulation (OAC) for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with contraindications for long-term OAC. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has a high prevalence among AF patients, and was shown to increase the number of peri-procedural complications in cardiac interventions.

Purpose

This subanalysis of the LAARGE registry aimed to investigate CKD's impact on outcomes after LAAC.

Methods

This prospective, real-world LAAC registry included 625 patients with documented renal function from 37 German centers between April 2014 and January 2016. CKD was defined by an eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Procedure was conducted with different LAAC devices considering the relevant recommendations. Baseline characteristics, procedural data, intra-hospital and one-year follow-up outcome were registered for CKD and non-CKD patients stratified by the different CKD stages.

Results

CKD patients (n=300; 48.0%) had a more pronounced cardiovascular risk profile, a higher stroke (CHA2DS2-VASc score 4.9±1.5 vs. 4.2±1.5; p<0.001) and bleeding risk (HAS-BLED score 4.3±1.0 vs. 3.5±1.0; p<0.001), and had experienced more prior bleedings (83.7 vs. 76.3%; p=0.022). Implantation success was similarly high between both groups (97.9%; p=n.s.). In CKD patients, MACCE during one-year follow-up was more frequent (18.1 vs. 6.8%; p<0.001) mainly being triggered by all-cause deaths, but in-hospital MACCE was not (0.3 vs. 0.3%; p=n.s.). Kaplan-Meier estimation showed a lower one-year survival among CKD patients (82.4 vs. 94.4%; p<0.001) without significant accentuation in patients with advanced CKD (i.e., <30 mL/min/1.73 m2; p=n.s. to other CKD patients). While annual rate of device associated complications (2.6 vs. 2.8%; p=n.s.) and strokes (0 vs. 1.0%; p=n.s.) was comparable during follow-up, annual severe bleeding rate was higher in CKD patients (2.6 vs. 0.3%; p=0.027) which was 71.4 and 94.4% less than expected from the HAS-BLED score (p<0.01 for the comparison to the estimated risks, but no significant interaction between groups).

Conclusions

Despite an increased cardiovascular risk profile of CKD patients, device implantation was safe, and annual stroke rate was statistically indifferent to non-CKD patients across all CKD stages after LAAC. Moreover, a substantial reduction of annual stroke and major bleeding risk was observed, as compared to the estimated annual risk.

Acknowledgement/Funding

Stiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung, Ludwigshafen, Germany

P1719Sex-specific PCI strategies in patients with AMI and cardiogenic shock: a substudy of the culprit-shock trial

Background and purpose

Women are more likely to suffer from a cardiogenic shock (CS) as the most severe complication of an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and tend to have a higher mortality. Data concerning optimal management among women with CS are lacking. Aim of this study was therefore to better define characteristics of women suffering a CS and to investigate the influence of sex on different coronary revascularisation strategies

Methods and results

In the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial, patients with CS complicating AMI and multivessel coronary artery disease were randomly assigned to one of the following coronary revascularisation strategies: either percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the culprit lesion only or immediate multivessel PCI. Primary end-point was a composite of death from any cause or severe renal failure leading to renal-replacement within 30 days after randomisation. We investigated sex-specific differences in general and according to the revascularisation strategies.

Among all 706 randomised patients 26% were women. After 30 days, the primary end-point occurred in 55% women and 49% men (p=0.20), showing a relative risk of 1.14; 95% CI 0.94–1.38; p=0.17, women vs. men. Those women were older, more frequent diabetic and had more peripheral artery disease and less frequent smokers and less often family history of coronary artery disease.

Regarding revascularisation strategy the composite end-point occurred in 55.8% women treated with the culprit-only strategy (vs. 42.4% men, p=0.04) and in 54.7% women in the multivessel group (vs. 55.6% men, p=0.99). This resulted in a no-significant difference among both groups (interaction p-value of 0.11).

Conclusions

In this large randomised trial among patients with multivessel coronary disease and CS complicating AMI, women had similar outcome for mortality and severe renal failure. Sex did not show to influence mortality and renal failure according to the different coronary revascularisation strategies. These data suggest that women and men presenting with CS should be treated equally.