Genetic correlates of therapeutic toxicities of stage III colon carcinoma patients treated with adjuvant FOLFOX+/-cetuximab (NCCTG N0147, Alliance)

3604

Background: Limited research has investigated the role of variation in the host genome as a determinant of colon carcinoma (CC) outcomes, including toxicity due to therapeutic agents. We examined the relationship between germline genetic factors and treatment-associated serious adverse events (SAEs) in a population of CC patients in which treatment was standardized and follow-up for outcomes was uniformly conducted. Methods: Using existing biospecimens from CC patients with resected stage III disease in a phase III randomized trial of FOLFOX adjuvant chemotherapy with and without cetuximab (NCCTG N0147), genome-wide genotyping arrays were conducted for 2200 patients for a total of ~20 million single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Using logistic regression models we assessed SNP-specific associations with SAEs, utilizing a discovery-based approach to search the genome in an unbiased manner. Detailed information on SAEs was collected using the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, v3.0). Analyses evaluating associations with specific classes of common grade ≥3 SAEs were performed, including gastrointestinal toxicities, neutropenia, and paresthesias. A threshold of P < 5x10-8was used to denote genome-wide significance. Results: Among patients who received FOLFOX, several SNPs on chr 15 near the ANP32A gene and on chr 2 near the CD207 gene were statistically significantly associated with grade ≥3 neuropathy. The strongest SNP-specific associations in these regions were in the range of odds ratio (OR) = 1.3, P = 2.8×10−10 and OR = 1.5, P = 2.7×10−10, respectively. Conclusions: Findings from this genome-wide analysis demonstrate the potential importance of germline genetic variation in influencing CC patients’ experience of specific toxicities to FOLFOX regimens. These results highlight two genomic regions of potential interest for understanding the biological mechanism for such toxicities, although further evaluation and replication is needed. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U10CA180820, U10CA180863, U10CA180888, CCSRI 021039, R01CA176272, Eli Lilly & Co, Pfizer, Sanofi. Clinical trial information: NCT00079274 .

A retrospective analysis of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel for the treatment of metastatic cholangiocarcinoma

e15616

Background: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a progressively fatal disease with an annual incidence of 1-2 cases per 100,000 people in the USA. Complete surgical resection is the only curative option for CCA. However, the majority of patients (pts) have advanced disease at diagnosis, and those undergoing resection often develop local or distant recurrence. Gemcitabine and Cisplatin remains the only standard chemotherapeutic regimen for advanced CCA. Alternative and improved therapies are critically needed. Gemcitabine/nab-Paclitaxel (GA) is a regimen that has become standard therapy in advanced pancreatic cancer (PDAC). Given the morphologic and histologic similarities between PDAC and CCA, this regimen has been used in advanced CCA, but no data exists regarding its efficacy in this disease. The goal of our study is to evaluate the Mayo Clinic experience with GA for the treatment of metastatic CCA. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed records from adult pts at Mayo Clinic with metastatic cholangiocarcinoma who received at least 2 cycles of GA. Our aims were to assess the progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and disease response. Results: We analyzed 9 pts, 3 male and 6 female. The median age at diagnosis was 50 years (range 41-64). Six pts had metastatic disease at diagnosis while 3 underwent surgery with subsequent distant disease recurrence. Pts received a median of 2 lines (range 0-5) of systemic therapy prior to receiving GA, and a median of 2 cycles (range 2-15) of GA. At the time of our analysis, 4 of the 9 pts (44%) had died. The median OS from initiation of GA was 7.3 months (95% CI 1.7- 12.9) and median PFS from initiation of GA was 4.7 months (95% CI 0.48-8.9). The best overall responses using RECIST criteria were: partial response in 1 (11%), stable disease in 5 (55%) and disease progression in 3 (33%) pts. One pt remained on therapy 14.9 months after initiating GA. Conclusions: In our study, the combination of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel has demonstrated similar OS and PFS as other systemic therapies. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of this regimen in CCA. Ongoing, prospective trials are currently evaluating this regimen in advanced CCA.

Analysis of serum vitamin D levels and prognosis in stage III colon carcinoma patients treated with adjuvant FOLFOX+/- cetuximab chemotherapy: NCCTG N0147 (Alliance)

3516

Background: Epidemiological data suggest a protective effect of vitamin D on CC risk. However, association of serum vitamin D level with clinical outcome in pts with surgically resected CC remains unknown. We analyzed total circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D)] with clinical outcome in pts with resected stage III CC treated with FOLFOX +/- cetuximab in a phase III trial. Methods: Association of pre-treatment level of plasma 25(OH)D with disease-free survival (DFS) and time-to-recurrence (TTR) was analyzed with 25(OH)D as a continuous variable by a relative risk model with splines and as a binary variable (vitamin D deficient [<30 ng/mL]) using multivariable Cox regression. Results: Overall, 49% (291/600) of pts were vitamin D deficient. Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency was significantly higher in women vs men (52% vs. 48%, p=0.030) and in blacks vs whites (74% vs. 45%, p=0.0003). The continuous 25(OH)D level and pt sex were associated by the interaction test (pinteraction=0.044). There were no statistically significant associations with DFS/TTR for either continuous 25(OH)D level (DFS, p=0.22; TTR, p=0.26) nor for vitamin D deficiency (DFS, adjusted hazard ratio [HRadj]=1.01, 95% CI, 0.74-1.38; padj=0.94; TTR, HRadj=1.00; CI, 0.72-1.38; padj=0.99. A comparison of the highest vs lowest tertile showed a significant association between the highest 25(OH)D level and better outcomes in men (DFS, HRadj.=0.18, CI, 0.04-0.76, padj=0.020; TTR, HRadj.=0.12, CI, 0.02-0.64, padj=0.014), but not in women (DFS, pinteraction=0.039; TTR, pinteraction=0.033). Conclusions: Nearly one-half of pts in the clinical trial cohort were vitamin D deficient with lowest 25(OH)D levels found in women and blacks. While vitamin D deficiency was not associated with adverse outcome, high levels of vitamin D in men, but not women, were associated with longer survival. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U10CA180820, U10CA180863, U10CA180888, U10CA077202, CCSRI 021039. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00079274.

Clinical and pathological features of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) of the pancreas: A retrospective review of cases at Mayo Clinic

e15757

Background: SPN is a rare neoplasia of the pancreas, defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as an epithelial low-grade malignant neoplasm, with a high-grade malignant transformation potential. Literature in this subject is scarce and limited only to small retrospective series. Methods: This is a retrospective study aiming to characterize patients with the diagnosis of SPN at Mayo Clinic between 1992 and 2016. Demographics, clinical and pathological features, recurrence rate and overall survival were recorded. Malignant SPN was defined as per the WHO 2010 classification (Perineural invasion, angioinvasion or deep tissue invasion) and compared to Benign SPN. Results: 44 patients with SPN were identified. 39 patients (88.6%) were female. Median age at diagnosis was 27.5 (Range: 13-64). The most frequent presentation was abdominal pain (52.6%), whereas 36.8% were diagnosed based on incidental imaging findings. Majority (60.4%) of the tumors were located at the pancreatic tail, and 48.5% were solid-cystic lesions. Vascular and lymph node involvement were infrequent. 15 cases (30.23%) were classified as malignant. Tumor size was associated with malignant behavior (Table). Three patients had a metastatic presentation. All but 1 patient were treated with surgery. R1 resection was more frequent in malignant SPN, and 2 patients experienced disease recurrence. Two Stage IV patients were treated with surgery and experienced long term survival, one of them without evidence of disease. There was only 1 death recorded. Conclusions: SNP presents predominantly on young women. The prognosis is excellent even in presence of malignant features, and a complete surgery remains as the main treatment. [Table: see text]

Association of DNA Mismatch Repair and Mutations in BRAF and KRAS With Survival After Recurrence in Stage III Colon Cancers : A Secondary Analysis of 2 Randomized Clinical Trials

Importance

The association of biomarkers with patient survival after recurrence (SAR) of cancer is poorly understood but may guide management and treatment.

Objective

To determine the association of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) status and somatic mutation in the B-Raf proto-oncogene (c.1799T>A [V600E]; BRAFV600E) or exon 2 of the KRAS proto-oncogene (KRAS) in the primary tumor with SAR in patients with stage III colon carcinomas treated with adjuvant chemotherapy.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Patients with resected stage III colon cancers were randomized to adjuvant FOLFOX (folinic acid [leucovorin calcium], fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) chemotherapy with or without cetuximab (North Central Cancer Treatment Group N0147 trial) or adjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab (National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project C-08 trial). Associations of biomarkers with SAR were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for clinicopathologic features and time to recurrence (data collected February 10, 2004, to August 7, 2015).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary study outcome was survival after recurrence of cancer. A secondary outcome measure was the effect of the site of the primary tumor on the association of biomarkers with SAR.

Results

Among 871 patients with cancer recurrence in the N0147 trial (472 men [54.2%] and 399 women [45.8%]; mean [SD] age, 57.8 [11.2] years) and 524 in the C-08 trial (269 men [51.3%] and 255 women [48.7%]; mean [SD] age, 57.0 [11.7] years), multivariable analysis revealed that patients whose tumors had deficient vs proficient MMR had significantly better SAR (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 0.70; 95% CI, 0.52-0.96; P = .03). Patients whose tumors harbored mutant BRAFV600E (AHR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.85-3.25; P < .001) or mutant KRAS (AHR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.00-1.47; P = .052) had worse SAR compared with those whose tumors had wild-type copies of both genes, although only results for BRAFV600E achieved statistical significance. Significant interactions were found for MMR (P = .03) and KRAS (P = .02) by primary tumor site for SAR. Improved SAR was observed for patients with deficient MMR tumors of the proximal vs distal colon (AHR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.40-0.83; P = .003), and worse SAR was observed for tumors of the distal colon with mutant KRAS in codon 12 (AHR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.30-2.38; P < .001) and codon 13 (AHR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.08-2.86; P = .02).

Conclusions and Relevance

In patients with recurrence of stage III colon cancer, deficient MMR was significantly associated with better SAR, and this benefit was limited to primary tumors of the proximal colon. Mutations in BRAFV600E were significantly associated with worse SAR, and worse SAR for BRAFV600E or KRAS mutant tumors was more strongly associated with distal cancers. These biomarkers have implications for patient management at recurrence.

Trial Registration

clinicaltrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00079274 and NCT00096278.

Phase I/II Randomized Trial of Sorafenib and Bevacizumab as First-Line Therapy in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma: North Central Cancer Treatment Group Trial N0745 (Alliance)

BACKGROUND

Angiogenesis has been a major target of novel drug development in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It is hypothesized that the combination of two antiangiogenic agents, sorafenib and bevacizumab, will provide greater blockade of angiogenesis.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the optimal dose, safety, and effectiveness of dual anti-angiogenic therapy with sorafenib and bevacizumab in patients with advanced HCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with locally advanced or metastatic HCC not amenable for surgery or liver transplant were eligible. The phase I starting dose level was bevacizumab 1.25 mg/kg day 1 and 15 plus sorafenib 400 mg twice daily (BID) days 1-28. In the phase II portion, patients were randomized to receive bevacizumab and sorafenib at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or sorafenib 400 mg BID.

RESULTS

Seventen patients were enrolled in the phase I component. Dose-limiting toxicities included grade 3 hand/foot skin reaction, fatigue, hypertension, alanine/aspartate aminotransferase increase, dehydration, hypophosphatemia, creatinine increase, hypoglycemia, nausea/vomiting, and grade 4 hyponatremia. Seven patients were enrolled in the phase II component at the MTD: sorafenib 200 mg BID days 1-28 and bevacizumab 2.5 mg/kg every other week; 57% (4/7) had grade 3 AEs at least possibly related to treatment. No responses were observed in the phase II portion. Estimated median time to progression and survival were 8.6 months (95% CI: 0.4-16.3) and 13.3 months (95% CI 4.4 - not estimable), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The MTD of the combination is sorafenib 200 mg twice daily on days 1-28 plus bevacizumab 2.5 mg/kg on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. In the phase II portion of the trial, concerns regarding excessive toxicity, low efficacy, and slow enrollment led to discontinuation of the trial. (Clinical Trials ID: NCT00867321.).

Outcomes of second line treatment in patients with advanced and metastatic biliary cancers

420

Background: Advanced biliary cancers respond poorly to chemotherapy and have a dismal survival. Currently gemcitabine-cisplatin (GC) is the standard of care for patients with advanced disease. The efficacy of second line treatment options is not well-defined. We retrospectively evaluated outcomes of patients undergoing second line treatment for advanced biliary cancers at Mayo Clinic. Methods: After obtaining approval from the institutional board review (IRB), we identified 42 patients with advanced and metastatic biliary cancers that progressed after first line (GC) and received second line treatment from 2007-2014. All patients had adequate follow up data. JMP software was used for statistical analysis. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests were used for survival analysis, and multivariate cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the prognostic effect of pertinent clinical variables. All tests were two sided and a P value of < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: The median age at diagnosis was 61.5 (range 26-87). The most common regimens used for second line settings were 5-FU-based (69%) followed by gemcitabine-based regimens (19%). The overall response rate (ORR) was 9.1%, while the disease control rate (DCR; stable disease and partial response) was 33%. The median overall survival (mOS) for the entire cohort from first line was 16.8 months (95% CI 12.7-21.7) and the progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.16 months (95% CI 7.3-14.7). From second line start the mOS was 10.4 months (95%; CI 7.3-23.7), and PFS was 2.8 months (95% CI 2.3-4.0). 73% of patients who received second line therapy were alive at 6 months and 50% at 12 months. 25 patients received third line treatment after progression. An univariate and multivariate analysis were performed including age, sex, stage at diagnosis, regimen used, CA19-9 and total body weight loss > 5%, but no significant prognostic factors were identified. Conclusions: Patients with biliary cancers who progress after first line treatment have poor prognosis, but may benefit from second line regimens. 5-FU based regimens were the most commonly used in the second line setting, and 73% of patients who received second line therapy were alive at 6 months.

Family history of colorectal cancer and its impact on survival in patients with resected stage III colon cancer: results from NCCTG Trial N0147 (Alliance)

BACKGROUND

Family history of colon cancer often portends increased risk of disease development; however, the prognostic significance of family history related to disease and survival outcomes is unclear.

METHODS

To investigate the relationship between family history of colorectal cancer and survival outcomes in stage III colon cancer patients, a prospective cohort of 1,935 patients with resected stage III colon cancer enrolled in a randomized controlled trial (N0147), comparing the standard of care FOLFOX to FOLFOX with cetuximab, was studied. Patients completed a baseline questionnaire on family history and were followed every 6 months until death or 5 years after randomization.

RESULTS

We examined the endpoints of disease-free survival (DFS), time to recurrence (TTR) and overall survival (OS), comparing patients with a positive versus negative family history of colorectal cancer. The adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for patients with a positive family history were 0.95 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.78-1.16] for DFS, 0.94 (95% CI, 0.76-1.16) for TTR, and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.74-1.15) for OS (all adjusted P>0.47). A non-significant trend toward improved DFS (P=0.17; adjusted P=0.34) was observed when 2 or more relatives were affected as compared to 0 relatives (multivariate HR: 0.72; 95% CI, 0.45-1.15), whereas subjects with histories of 0 or 1 affected relatives had similar DFS (multivariate HR for 1 vs. 0: 1.00; 95% CI, 0.81-1.24). Interactions of the molecular factors KRAS, BRAF, and MMR with family history were also explored. The only significant interaction was for deficient MMR (dMMR) and first-degree relatives with a family history of colorectal cancer (0 vs. 1 vs. 2+ relatives) for a benefit on OS (univariate P=0.001), which remained significant after adjusting for other factors (P=0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with stage III resected colon cancer treated with adjuvant FOLFOX, a family history of colorectal cancer did not significantly impact DFS, TTR, or OS outcomes, with the exception of patients with dMMR-expressing tumors.

Prognostic Value of BRAF and KRAS Mutations in MSI and MSS Stage III Colon Cancer

Background

The prognostic value of BRAF and KRAS mutations within microsatellite-unstable (MSI) and microsatellite-stable (MSS) subgroups of resected colon carcinoma patients remains controversial. We examined this question in prospectively collected biospecimens from stage III colon cancer with separate analysis of MSI and MSS tumors from patients receiving adjuvant FOLFOX +/- cetuximab in two adjuvant therapy trials.

Methods

Three groups were defined: BRAF Mutant, KRAS Mutant, and double wild-type. The analytic strategy involved estimation of study-specific effects, assessment of homogeneity of results, and then analysis of pooled data as no differences in patient outcome were found between treatment arms in both trials. Associations of mutations with patient outcome were analyzed, and multivariable models were adjusted for treatment and relevant factors.

Results

Four thousand four hundred eleven tumors were evaluable for BRAF and KRAS mutations and mismatch repair status; 3934 were MSS and 477 were MSI. In MSS patients, all BRAF V600E mutations (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.23 to 1.92, P < .001), KRAS codon 12 alterations, and p.G13D mutations (HR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.40 to 1.83, P < .001) were associated with shorter time to recurrence (TTR) and shorter survival after relapse (SAR; HR = 3.02 , 95% CI = 2.32 to 3.93, P < .001, and HR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.44, P = .04, respectively). Overall survival (OS) in MSS patients was poorer for BRAF-mutant patients (HR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.56 to 2.57, P < .001) and KRAS-mutant patients (HR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.38 to 1.91, P < .001) vs wild-type. No prognostic role of KRAS or BRAF mutations was seen in MSI patients. Furthermore, no interaction was found between treatment arm (with or without cetuximab) and KRAS and BRAF mutations for TTR or OS in MSS patients.

Conclusions

In a pooled analysis of resected stage III colon cancer patients receiving adjuvant FOLFOX, BRAF or KRAS mutations are independently associated with shorter TTR, SAR, and OS in patients with MSS, but not MSI, tumors. Future clinical trials in the adjuvant setting should consider these mutations as important stratification factors.

Ramucirumab combined with FOLFOX as front-line therapy for advanced esophageal, gastroesophageal junction, or gastric adenocarcinoma: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter Phase II trial

BACKGROUND

We report the first randomized, Phase II trial of ramucirumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 monoclonal antibody, as front-line therapy in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastric/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients from the USA with advanced esophageal, gastric, or GEJ adenocarcinoma randomly received (1:1) mFOLFOX6 plus ramucirumab (8 mg/kg) or mFOLFOX6 plus placebo every 2 weeks. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) with 80% power to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.71 (one-sided α = 0.15). Secondary end points included evaluation of response and overall survival (OS); an exploratory ramucirumab exposure-response analysis was undertaken.

RESULTS

Of 168 randomized patients, 52% of tumors were located in the stomach/GEJ and 48% in the esophagus. The trial did not meet the primary end point of PFS [6.4 versus 6.7 months, HR 0.98 (95% confidence interval 0.69-1.37)] or the secondary end point of OS (11.7 versus 11.5 months) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Objective response rates (45.2% versus 46.4%) were similar between arms. Most Grade ≥3 toxicities did not differ significantly between arms, yet premature discontinuation of FOLFOX and ramucirumab (for reasons other than progressive disease) was more common among ramucirumab- versus placebo-treated patients. In an exploratory analysis that censored for premature discontinuation, the HR for PFS favored the ramucirumab arm (HR 0.76), particularly in patients with gastric/GEJ cancer. An exploratory exposure-response analysis indicated that patients with higher ramucirumab exposure had longer OS.

CONCLUSION

The addition of ramucirumab to front-line mFOLFOX6 did not improve PFS in the ITT population.

CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER

NCT01246960.

Relationship Between Metformin Use and Recurrence and Survival in Patients With Resected Stage III Colon Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Chemotherapy: Results From North Central Cancer Treatment Group N0147 (Alliance)

BACKGROUND

Preclinical and epidemiological data suggest that metformin might have antineoplastic properties against colon cancer (CC). However, the effect of metformin use on patient survival in stage III CC after curative resection is unknown. The survival outcomes were comparable regardless of the duration of metformin use.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Before randomization to FOLFOX (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin) with or without cetuximab, 1,958 patients with stage III CC enrolled in the N0147 study completed a questionnaire with information on diabetes mellitus (DM) and metformin use. Cox models were used to assess the association between metformin use and disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and the time to recurrence (TTR), adjusting for clinical and/or pathological factors.

RESULTS

Of the 1,958 patients, 1,691 (86%) reported no history of DM, 115 reported DM with metformin use (6%), and 152 reported DM without metformin use (8%). The adjuvant treatment arms were pooled, because metformin use showed homogeneous effects on outcomes across the two arms. Among the patients with DM (n = 267), DFS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-1.35; p = .60), OS (aHR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.65-1.49; p = .95), and TTR (aHR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.56-1.35; p = .53) were not different for the metformin users compared with the nonusers after adjusting for tumor and patient factors. The survival outcomes were comparable regardless of the duration of metformin use (<1, 1-5, 6-10, ≥11 years) before randomization (p_trend = .64 for DFS, p_trend = .84 for OS, and p_trend = .87 for TTR). No interaction effects were observed between metformin use and KRAS, BRAF mutation status, tumor site, T/N stage, gender, or age.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with stage III CC undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy who used metformin before the diagnosis of CC experienced DFS, OS, and TTR similar to those for non-DM patients and DM patients without metformin use.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The present study did not find any relationship between metformin use or its duration and disease-free survival, time to recurrence, and overall survival in a large cohort of patients with resected stage III colon cancer receiving adjuvant FOLFOX (folinic acid, fluorouracil, oxaliplatin)-based chemotherapy. This relationship was not modified by KRAS or BRAF mutation or DNA mismatch repair status. Metformin use did not increase or decrease the likelihood of chemotherapy-related grade 3 or higher adverse events.

Antitumor effect of FGFR inhibitors on a novel cholangiocarcinoma patient derived xenograft mouse model endogenously expressing an FGFR2-CCDC6 fusion protein

Cholangiocarcinoma is a highly lethal cancer with limited therapeutic options. Recent genomic analysis of cholangiocarcinoma has revealed the presence of fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) fusion proteins in up to 13% of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). FGFR fusions have been identified as a novel oncogenic and druggable target in a number of cancers. In this study, we established a novel cholangiocarcinoma patient derived xenograft (PDX) mouse model bearing an FGFR2-CCDC6 fusion protein from a metastatic lung nodule of an iCCA patient. Using this PDX model, we confirmed the ability of the FGFR inhibitors, ponatinib, dovitinib and BGJ398, to modulate FGFR signaling, inhibit cell proliferation and induce cell apoptosis in cholangiocarcinoma tumors harboring FGFR2 fusions. In addition, BGJ398 appeared to be superior in potency to ponatinib and dovitinib in this model. Our findings provide a strong rationale for the investigation of FGFR inhibitors, particularly BGJ398, as a therapeutic option for cholangiocarcinoma patients harboring FGFR2 fusions.

Alcohol consumption and colon cancer prognosis among participants in north central cancer treatment group phase III trial N0147

Alcohol consumption is associated with a modest increased risk of colon cancer, but its relationship with colon cancer survival has not been elucidated. Using data from a phase III randomized adjuvant trial, we assessed the association of alcohol consumption with colon cancer outcomes. Patients completed a risk factor questionnaire before randomization to FOLFOX or FOLFOX + cetuximab (N = 1984). Information was collected on lifestyle factors, including smoking, physical activity and consumption of different types of alcohol. Cox models assessed the association between alcohol consumption and outcomes of disease-free survival (DFS), time-to-recurrence (TTR) and overall survival (OS), adjusting for age, sex, study arm, body mass, smoking, physical activity and performance status. No statistically significant difference in outcomes between ever and never drinkers were noted [hazard ratio (HR)DFS  = 0.86, HRTTR  = 0.87, HROS  = 0.86, p-values = 0.11-0.17]. However, when considering alcohol type, ever consumers of red wine (n = 628) had significantly better outcomes than never consumers (HRDFS  = 0.80, HRTTR  = 0.81, HROS  = 0.78, p-values = 0.01-0.02). Favorable outcomes were confirmed in patients who consumed 1-30 glasses/month of red wine (n = 601, HR = 0.80-0.83, p-values = 0.03-0.049); there was a suggestion of more favorable outcomes in patients who consumed >30 glasses/month of red wine (n = 27, HR = 0.33-0.38, p-values = 0.05-0.06). Beer and liquor consumption were not associated with outcomes. Although alcohol consumption was not associated with colon cancer outcomes overall, mild to moderate red wine consumption was suggestively associated with longer OS, DFS and TTR in stage III colon cancer patients.

Determinants of Early Mortality Among 37,568 Patients With Colon Cancer Who Participated in 25 Clinical Trials From the Adjuvant Colon Cancer Endpoints Database

PURPOSE

Factors associated with early mortality after surgery and treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer are poorly understood. We aimed to characterize the determinants of early mortality in a large cohort of colon cancer trial participants.

METHODS

A pooled analysis of 37,568 patients in 25 randomized trials of adjuvant systemic therapy was conducted. Multivariable logistic regression models with several definitions of early mortality (30, 60, and 90 days, and 6 months) were constructed, adjusting for clinically and statistically significant variables. A nomogram for 6-month mortality was developed and validated.

RESULTS

Median age among patients was 61 years, patient demographics included 54% men and 90% White, 29% and 71% had stage II and III disease, respectively, and 79%, 20%, and 1% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) of 0, 1, and ≥ 2, respectively. Early mortality was low: 0.3% at 30 days, 0.6% at 60 days, 0.8% at 90 days, and 1.4% at 6 months. Of those patients who died by 6 months post-random assignment, 40% had documented disease recurrence prior to death. Early disease recurrence was associated with a markedly increased risk of death during the first 6 months post-treatment (hazard ratio, 82.6; 95%CI, 66.9 to 102.1). In prognostic analyses, advanced age, male sex, poorer PS, increasing ratio of positive to examined lymph nodes, earlier decade of enrollment, and higher tumor stage and grade predicted a greater likelihood of early mortality, whereas treatment received was not strongly predictive. A multivariable model for 6-month mortality showed strong optimism-adjusted discrimination (concordance index, 0.73) and calibration.

CONCLUSION

Early mortality was infrequent but more prevalent in patients with advanced age and a PS of ≥ 2, underscoring the need to carefully consider the risk-to-benefit ratio when making treatment decisions in these subgroups.

Intra and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: An evaluation of adjuvant therapy

291

Background: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare malignancy with poor survival. The only curative therapy is resection and the role of adjuvant therapy is not well defined. Despite the unproven benefit, adjuvant therapy is used in resected CCA. The aim of this study is to analyze our institution’s outcomes for peri-operative treatment of resected intrahepatic and extrahepatic CCA. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 145 intrahepatic (iCCA) and 109 extrahepatic (eCCA) CCA patients who underwent resection at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester. The majority of treated patients received adjuvant chemotherapy; however neo-adjuvant and radiation were also included. Results: In stage 1-2 iCCA patients, the HR indicated worse outcomes for time to recurrence and death. For stage 3-4 or node positive disease, outcomes were not significantly different. Those with node unknown/negative disease had significantly worse time to recurrence but not OS. There was a significant difference in stage and treatment modality between these groups (see table). Among eCCA, for any stage and node positive disease, outcomes were not different. In the node unknown/negative group, neither time to recurrence nor OS differed significantly. In controlling for different features in multi-variable analyses, no significant differences were observed (see table). Conclusions: This retrospective study does not show a significant difference in recurrence free or OS for treated patients. The apparent lack of benefit most likely reflects selection bias among treatment groups. Prospective, randomized trials are needed to make sound recommendations in adjuvant treatment for CCA. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Impact of Patient Factors on Recurrence Risk and Time Dependency of Oxaliplatin Benefit in Patients With Colon Cancer: Analysis From Modern-Era Adjuvant Studies in the Adjuvant Colon Cancer End Points (ACCENT) Database

PURPOSE

Fluorouracil plus leucovorin (FU + LV) adjuvant chemotherapy reduced the risk of recurrence and death across all time points in a pooled analysis of 20,898 patients with colon cancer from 18 randomized studies. The impact of oxaliplatin added to FU + LV on the time course of recurrence and survival remains unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 12,233 patients enrolled to the randomized trials C-07, C-08, N0147, MOSAIC (Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer), and XELOXA (Adjuvant XELOX) were pooled to examine the impact of oxaliplatin and tumor-specific factors on the time course of recurrence and death. For each end point, continuous-time risk was modeled over 6 years post treatment in all oxaliplatin-treated patients and patients concurrently randomized to FU + LV with or without oxaliplatin; the latter analyses supported time-dependent treatment comparisons.

RESULTS

Addition of oxaliplatin significantly reduced the risk of recurrence within the first 14 months post treatment for patients with stage II disease and within the first 4 years for patients with stage III disease. Oxaliplatin also significantly reduced risk of death from 2 to 6 years post treatment for patients with stage III disease, with no differences in timing of outcomes between treatment groups (ie, oxaliplatin did not simply postpone recurrence or death compared with FU + LV alone). Patients with stage II disease receiving oxaliplatin did not exhibit a significant reduction in risk of death in the first 6 years post treatment. Recurrence risk peaked near 14 months for both treatments, and risk of recurrence and death increased with increased tumor and nodal burden.

CONCLUSIONS

These analyses support the addition of oxaliplatin to fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant therapy in patients with stage III disease and underscore the need for adequate surveillance of patients with colon cancer during the first 3 years after adjuvant therapy.

Stool DNA Testing for Screening Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia in Alaska Native People

OBJECTIVE

To assess the accuracy of a multitarget stool DNA test (MT-sDNA) compared with fecal immunochemical testing for hemoglobin (FIT) for detection of screening-relevant colorectal neoplasia (SRN) in Alaska Native people, who have among the world's highest rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) and limited access to conventional screening approaches.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a prospective, cross-sectional study of asymptomatic Alaska Native adults aged 40-85 years and older undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopy between February 6, 2012, and August 7, 2014.

RESULTS

Among 868 enrolled participants, 661 completed the study (403 [61%] women). Overall, SRN detection by MT-sDNA (49%) was superior to that by FIT (28%; P<.001); in the screening group, SRN detection rates were 50% and 31%, respectively (P=.01). Multitarget stool DNA testing detected 62% of adenomas 2 cm or larger vs 29% by FIT (P=.05). Sensitivity by MT-sDNA increased with adenoma size (to 80% for lesions ≥3 cm; P=.01 for trend) and substantially exceeded FIT sensitivity at all adenoma sizes. For sessile serrated polyps larger than 1 cm (n=9), detection was 67% by MT-sDNA vs 11% by FIT (P=.07). For CRC (n=10), detection was 100% by MT-sDNA vs 80% by FIT (P=.48). Specificities were 93% and 96%, respectively (P=.03).

CONCLUSION

The sensitivity of MT-sDNA for cancer and larger polyps was high and significantly greater than that of FIT for polyps of any size, while specificity was slightly higher with FIT. These findings could translate into high cumulative neoplasm detection rates on serial testing within a screening program. The MT-sDNA represents a potential strategy to expand CRC screening and reduce CRC incidence and mortality, especially where access to endoscopy is limited.

Improving Adherence to Cancer Treatment by Addressing Quality of Life in Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Cancers

CONTEXT

Many patients with potentially curable cancer do not complete their prescribed treatment regimens because of the toxicity. There is evidence that the common endpoints of many of these toxicities are amenable to quality of life (QOL)-directed interventions.

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to determine the effect of a multidisciplinary QOL-directed intervention on patients' adherence to planned chemoradiation (CR) regimens.

METHODS

The results of two randomized controlled trials that used the same QOL intervention were pooled to form a cohort of 61 patients with advanced localized gastrointestinal cancer. Of these 61 subjects, 29 participated in six to eight bi- to triweekly sessions that included exercise, education, and relaxation, and 32 received usual medical care. The primary endpoint was completion of their prescribed CR regimens. Secondary outcomes included hospitalization during CR, rates of adverse postoperative events, and complete pathological response in those undergoing neoadjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

Significantly, more members of the intervention than the control group completed their planned CR regimens (77.8 vs. 38.2%, P = 0.003). More participants in the control (n = 14) than the intervention (n = 5) group (P = 0.063) required hospitalization. Among those undergoing neoadjuvant CR, those in the intervention group were significantly more likely to complete CR as planned (81.0% vs. 37.5%, P = 0.005) and less likely to be hospitalized (14.3% vs. 50.0%, P = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

A structured multidisciplinary QOL-directed intervention delivered to patients undergoing CR may increase the proportion of patients who complete CR as planned and reduce unplanned hospitalizations. Utilization is an important outcome in QOL-directed intervention trials.

Analysis of Molecular Markers by Anatomic Tumor Site in Stage III Colon Carcinomas from Adjuvant Chemotherapy Trial NCCTG N0147 (Alliance)

PURPOSE

To determine the frequency and prognostic association of molecular markers by anatomic tumor site in patients with stage III colon carcinomas.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

In a randomized trial of adjuvant FOLFOX ± cetuximab, BRAF(V600E) and KRAS (exon 2) mutations and DNA mismatch repair (MMR) proteins were analyzed in tumors (N = 3,018) in relationship to tumor location, including subsite. Cox models were used to assess clinical outcome, including overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

KRAS codon 12 mutations were most frequent at the splenic flexure and cecum; codon 13 mutations were evenly distributed. BRAF mutation frequency sharply increased from transverse colon to cecum in parallel with deficient (d) MMR. Nonmutated BRAF and KRAS tumors progressively decreased from sigmoid to transverse (all P < 0.0001). Significantly, poorer OS was found for mutant KRAS in distal [HR, 1.98; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.49-2.63; P < 0.0001] versus proximal (1.25; 95% CI, 0.97-1.60; P = 0.079) cancers. BRAF status and outcome were not significantly associated with tumor site. Proximal versus distal dMMR tumors had significantly better outcome. An interaction test was significant for tumor site by KRAS (P(adjusted) = 0.043) and MMR (P(adjusted) = 0.010) for OS. Significant prognostic differences for biomarkers by tumor site were maintained in the FOLFOX arm. Tumor site was independently prognostic with a stepwise improvement from cecum to sigmoid (OS: P(adjusted) = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Mutation in BRAF or KRAS codon 12 was enriched in proximal cancers whereas nonmutated BRAF/KRAS was increased in distal tumors. Significant differences in outcome for KRAS mutations and dMMR were found by tumor site, indicating that their interpretation should occur in the context of tumor location.

Racial Differences in BRAF/KRAS Mutation Rates and Survival in Stage III Colon Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

It is unknown if, after controlling for clinicopathologic variables and treatment, racial disparities in colon cancer outcomes persist. Molecular marker analysis in North American patients comparing Asians with other races has not been reported.

METHODS

BRAF (V600E) and KRAS mutations were analyzed in node-positive colon cancer patients (n = 3305) treated with FOLFOX-based chemotherapy in an adjuvant trial (Alliance N0147). Race categories included Asian, black, or white. Cox models were used to estimate disease-free survival (DFS) and time to recurrence (TTR). All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

BRAF mutation frequency in tumors from whites (13.9%) was twice that of tumors from Asians or blacks. KRAS mutation rates were highest in tumors from blacks (44.1%). KRAS/BRAF wild-type tumors were most common among Asians (66.7%) (P overall < .001). The prognostic impact of race differed by age and N stage (both P interaction < .02). Compared with whites, blacks had shorter DFS among patients younger than age 50 years (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.73 to 4.66) or with N1 disease (HR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.04 to 2.29), independent of BRAF, KRAS, and other covariates. Findings were consistent using TTR as the outcome. Asians had longer DFS among N2 tumors that was partly mediated by less frequent BRAF mutation.

CONCLUSIONS

Colon cancers from Asians have a lower rate of BRAF and KRAS mutations than blacks or whites. We report a novel interaction of race with age and N stage in node-positive disease, indicating that racial disparities in survival persist despite uniform stage and treatment in a phase III trial.