Survival advantage of chemoradiotherapy in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: Propensity score matched analysis with multiple subgroups

BACKGROUND

We compared overall survival (OS) between radiation therapy (RT) and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) using a large database.

METHODS

The National Cancer Data Base was queried for ATC patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2013 who received RT or CRT. Groups were balanced by propensity score matching (PSM) on nine relevant variables. OS was also examined in five paired subgroups given known patient heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Of 858 total patients, 575 received CRT and 283 received RT. CRT was associated with decreased risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.66, P < .001), 1-year OS 25.5% vs 14.3%. A survival advantage to CRT was seen using PSM cohorts (HR 0.75, P = .006). Those receiving definitive surgery saw the greatest benefit to CRT over RT (HR 0.65, P = .009), 1-year OS 39.6% vs 20.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

CRT is associated with decreased risk of death in ATC; the magnitude of CRT vs RT benefit varied by subgroup.

ERK inhibition effectively overcomes acquired resistance of epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant non-small cell lung cancer cells to osimertinib

BACKGROUND

Osimertinib (AZD9291), a third-generation, mutation-selective epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), is an approved drug for patients who have non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with activating EGFR mutations or those harboring a resistant T790M mutation. Unfortunately, all patients eventually relapse and develop resistance to osimertinib. The current study addressed whether ERK inhibition exerts effects similar to those produced by MEK inhibition in overcoming acquired resistance to osimertinib.

METHODS

Drug effects on cell and tumor growth were assessed by measuring cell number alterations and colony formation in vitro and with xenografts in nude mice in vivo. Apoptosis was assessed with annexin V/flow cytometry and protein cleavage. Protein alterations in cells were detected with Western blot analysis. Gene overexpression and knockout were achieved with lentiviral infection and CRISPR/Cas9, respectively.

RESULTS

The combination of osimertinib with an ERK inhibitor synergistically decreased the survival of osimertinib-resistant cell lines with enhanced induction of apoptosis and effectively inhibited the growth of osimertinib-resistant xenografts in nude mice. Moreover, the combination of an MEK or ERK inhibitor with a first-generation (eg, erlotinib) or second-generation (eg, afatinib) EGFR-TKI also very effectively inhibited the growth of osimertinib-resistant cells in vitro and of tumors in vivo, although these cell lines were cross-resistant to first-generation or second-generation EGFR-TKIs.

CONCLUSIONS

The current findings emphasize the importance of targeting MEK/ERK signaling in maintaining the long-term benefit of osimertinib through overcoming acquired resistance to osimertinib, warranting further investigation of this therapeutic strategy to improve the therapeutic efficacy of osimertinib in the clinic.

Combined Effect of Sarcopenia and Systemic Inflammation on Survival in Patients with Advanced Stage Cancer Treated with Immunotherapy

Background

Sarcopenia and inflammation have been associated with poor survival in patients with cancer. We explored the combined effects of these variables on survival in patients with cancer treated with immunotherapy.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of 90 patients enrolled on immunotherapy‐based phase I clinical trials at Emory University from 2009 to 2017. Baseline neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio, monocyte‐to‐lymphocyte ratio, and platelet‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were used as surrogates of inflammation. The skeletal muscle index (SMI) was derived from the skeletal muscle density calculated from baseline abdominal computed tomography images. Optimal cutoffs for continuous inflammation biomarkers and SMI were determined by bias‐adjusted log‐rank test. A four‐level risk stratification was used to create low‐risk (PLR <242 and nonsarcopenic), intermediate‐risk (PLR <242 and sarcopenic), high‐risk (PLR ≥242 and nonsarcopenic), and very‐high‐risk (PLR ≥242 and sarcopenic) groups with subsequent association with survival.

Results

Most patients (59%) were male, and the most common cancers were melanoma (33%) and gastrointestinal (22%). Very high‐risk, high‐risk, and intermediate‐risk patients had significantly shorter overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 8.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.65–27.01; p < .001; HR, 5.32; CI, 1.96–14.43; p = .001; and HR, 4.01; CI, 1.66–9.68; p = .002, respectively) and progression‐free survival (HR, 12.29; CI, 5.15–29.32; p < .001; HR, 3.51; CI, 1.37–9.02; p = .009; and HR, 2.14; CI, 1.12–4.10; p = .022, respectively) compared with low‐risk patients.

Conclusion

Baseline sarcopenia and elevated inflammatory biomarkers may have a combined effect on decreasing survival in immunotherapy‐treated patients in phase I trials. These data may be immediately applicable for medical oncologists for the risk stratification of patients beginning immunotherapeutic agents.

Implications for Practice

Sarcopenia and inflammation have been associated with poor survival in patients with cancer, but it is unclear how to apply this information to patient care. The authors created a risk‐stratification system that combined sarcopenia and platelet‐to‐lymphocyte ratio as a marker of systemic inflammation. The presence of sarcopenia and systemic inflammation decreased progression‐free survival and overall survival in our cohort of 90 patients who received immunotherapy in phase I clinical trials. The data presented in this study may be immediately applicable for medical oncologists as a way to risk‐stratify patients who are beginning treatment with immunotherapy.

The interaction between chronic inflammation and body composition is particularly important in the era of immunotherapy, considering that immune checkpoint inhibitors rely on the host immune system for their efficacy. This article reports on the combined effects of inflammation and sarcopenia on clinical outcomes in patients with solid tumors treated with immunotherapy‐based regimens.

Mcl-1 Interacts with Akt to Promote Lung Cancer Progression

Mcl-1 is a unique antiapoptotic Bcl2 family protein that functions as a gatekeeper in manipulating apoptosis and survival in cancer cells. Akt is an oncogenic kinase that regulates multiple cellular functions and its activity is significantly elevated in human cancers. Here we discovered a cross-talk between Mcl-1 and Akt in promoting lung cancer cell growth. Depletion of endogenous Mcl-1 from human lung cancer cells using CRISPR/Cas9 or Mcl-1 shRNA significantly decreased Akt activity, leading to suppression of lung cancer cell growth in vitro and in xenografts. Mechanistically, Mcl-1 directly interacted via its PEST domain with Akt at the pleckstrin homology (PH) domain. It is known that the interactions between the PH domain and kinase domain (KD) are important for maintaining Akt in an inactive state. The binding of Mcl-1/PH domain disrupted intramolecular PH/KD interactions to activate Akt. Intriguingly, Mcl-1 expression correlated with Akt activity in tumor tissues from patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Using the Mcl-1-binding PH domain of Akt as a docking site, we identified a novel small molecule, PH-687, that directly targets the PH domain and disrupts Mcl-1/Akt binding, leading to suppression of Akt activity and growth inhibition of lung cancer in vitro and in vivo. By targeting the Mcl-1/Akt interaction, this mechanism-driven agent provides a highly attractive strategy for the treatment of lung cancer. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings indicate that targeting Mcl-1/Akt interaction by employing small molecules such as PH-687 represents a potentially new and effective strategy for cancer treatment.

Randomized Phase II Study of Paclitaxel plus Alisertib versus Paclitaxel plus Placebo as Second-Line Therapy for SCLC: Primary and Correlative Biomarker Analyses

INTRODUCTION

We assessed the Aurora A kinase inhibitor, alisertib, plus paclitaxel (henceforth referred to as alisertib/paclitaxel) as second-line treatment for SCLC.

METHODS

In this double-blind study, patients with relapsed or refractory SCLC were stratified by relapse type (sensitive versus resistant or refractory) and brain metastases and randomized 1:1 to alisertib/paclitaxel or placebo plus paclitaxel (henceforth referred to as placebo/paclitaxel) in 28-day cycles. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Associations of c-Myc expression in tumor tissue (prespecified) and genetic alterations in circulating tumor DNA (retrospective) with clinical outcome were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 178 patients were enrolled (89 in each arm). The median PFS was 3.32 months with alisertib/paclitaxel versus 2.17 months with placebo/paclitaxel (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.77, 95% confidence limit [CI]: 0.557-1.067, p = 0.113 in the intent-to-treat population versus HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.509-0.985, p = 0.038 with corrected analysis applied). Among 140 patients with genetic alternations, patients with cell cycle regulator mutations (cyclin-dependent kinase 6 gene [CDK6], retinoblastoma-like 1 gene [RBL1], retinoblastoma-like 2 gene [RBL2], and retinoblastoma 1 gene [RB1]) had significantly improved PFS with alisertib/paclitaxel versus with placebo/paclitaxel (3.68 versus 1.80 months, respectively [HR = 0.395, 95% CI: 0.239-0.654, p = 0.0003]), and overall survival (7.20 versus 4.47 months, respectively [HR = 0.427, 95% CI: 0.259-0.704, p = 0.00085]). A subset of patients with c-Myc expression showed significantly improved PFS with alisertib/paclitaxel. The incidence of grade 3 or higher drug-related adverse events was 67% (58 patients) with alisertib/paclitaxel versus 22% (25 patients) with placebo/paclitaxel. Twelve patients (14%) versus 11 (12%) died on study, including four versus zero treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Efficacy signals were seen with alisertib/paclitaxel in relapsed or refractory SCLC. c-Myc expression and mutations in cell cycle regulators may be potential predictive biomarkers of alisertib efficacy; further prospective validations are warranted.

Myelopreservation with the CDK4/6 inhibitor trilaciclib in patients with small-cell lung cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy: a phase Ib/randomized phase II trial

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy-induced damage of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC) causes multi-lineage myelosuppression. Trilaciclib is an intravenous CDK4/6 inhibitor in development to proactively preserve HSPC and immune system function during chemotherapy (myelopreservation). Preclinically, trilaciclib transiently maintains HSPC in G1 arrest and protects them from chemotherapy damage, leading to faster hematopoietic recovery and enhanced antitumor immunity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a phase Ib (open-label, dose-finding) and phase II (randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled) study of the safety, efficacy and PK of trilaciclib in combination with etoposide/carboplatin (E/P) therapy for treatment-naive extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer patients. Patients received trilaciclib or placebo before E/P on days 1-3 of each cycle. Select end points were prespecified to assess the effect of trilaciclib on myelosuppression and antitumor efficacy.

RESULTS

A total of 122 patients were enrolled, with 19 patients in part 1 and 75 patients in part 2 receiving study drug. Improvements were seen with trilaciclib in neutrophil, RBC (red blood cell) and lymphocyte measures. Safety on trilaciclib+E/P was improved with fewer ≥G3 adverse events (AEs) in trilaciclib (50%) versus placebo (83.8%), primarily due to less hematological toxicity. No trilaciclib-related ≥G3 AEs occurred. Antitumor efficacy assessment for trilaciclib versus placebo, respectively, showed: ORR (66.7% versus 56.8%, P = 0.3831); median PFS [6.2 versus 5.0 m; hazard ratio (HR) 0.71; P = 0.1695]; and OS (10.9 versus 10.6 m; HR 0.87; P = 0.6107).

CONCLUSION

Trilaciclib demonstrated an improvement in the patient's tolerability of chemotherapy as shown by myelopreservation across multiple hematopoietic lineages resulting in fewer supportive care interventions and dose reductions, improved safety profile, and no detriment to antitumor efficacy. These data demonstrate strong proof-of-concept for trilaciclib's myelopreservation benefits.

CLINICAL TRAIL NUMBER

NCT02499770.

Sites of metastasis and association with clinical outcome in advanced stage cancer patients treated with immunotherapy

Background

Selecting the appropriate patients to receive immunotherapy (IO) remains a challenge due to the lack of optimal biomarkers. The presence of liver metastases has been implicated as a poor prognostic factor in patients with metastatic cancer. We investigated the association between sites of metastatic disease and clinical outcomes in patients receiving IO.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of 90 patients treated on IO-based phase 1 clinical trials at Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University between 2009 and 2017. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were measured from the first dose of IO to date of death or hospice referral and clinical or radiographic progression, respectively. Clinical benefit (CB) was defined as a best response of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD). Univariate analysis (UVA) and Multivariate analysis (MVA) were carried out using Cox proportional hazard model or logistic regression model. Covariates included age, whether IO is indicated for the patient’s histology, ECOG performance status, Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) risk group, number of metastatic sites, and histology.

Results

The median age was 63 years and 53% of patients were men. The most common histologies were melanoma (33%) and gastrointestinal cancers (22%). Most patients (73.3%) had more than one site of distant metastasis. Sites of metastasis collected were lymph node (n = 58), liver (n = 40), lung (n = 37), bone (n = 24), and brain (n = 8). Most patients (80.7%) were RMH good risk. Most patients (n = 62) had received 2+ prior lines of systemic treatment before receiving IO on trial; 27 patients (30.0%) received prior ICB. Liver metastases were associated with significantly shorter OS (HR: 0.38, CI: 0.17–0.84, p = 0.017). Patients with liver metastasis also trended towards having shorter PFS (HR: 0.70, CI: 0.41–1.19, p = 0.188). The median OS was substantially longer for patients without liver metastases (21.9 vs. 8.1 months, p = 0.0048).

Conclusions

Liver metastases may be a poor prognostic factor in patients receiving IO on phase 1 clinical trials. The presence of liver metastases may warrant consideration in updated prognostic models if these findings are validated in a larger prospective cohort.

Circulating Tumor DNA Profiling in Small-Cell Lung Cancer Identifies Potentially Targetable Alterations

PURPOSE

Patients with SCLC rarely undergo biopsies at relapse. When pursued, tissue obtained can be inadequate for molecular testing, posing a challenge in identifying potentially targetable alterations in a clinically meaningful time frame. We examined the feasibility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing in identifying potentially targetable alterations in SCLC.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

ctDNA test results were prospectively collected from patients with SCLC between 2014 and 2017 and analyzed. ctDNA profiles of SCLC at diagnosis and relapse were also compared.

RESULTS

A total of 609 samples collected from 564 patients between 2014 and 2017 were analyzed. The median turnaround time for test results was 14 days. Among patients with data on treatment status, there were 61 samples from 59 patients and 219 samples from 206 patients collected at diagnosis and relapse, respectively. The number of mutations or amplifications detected per sample did not differ by treatment status. Potentially targetable alterations in DNA repair, MAPK and PI3K pathways, and genes such as MYC and ARID1A were identifiable through ctDNA testing. Furthermore, our results support that it may be possible to reconstruct the clonal relationship between detected variants through ctDNA testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with relapsed SCLC rarely undergo biopsies for molecular testing and often require prompt treatment initiation. ctDNA testing is less invasive and capable of identifying alterations in relapsed disease in a clinically meaningful timeframe. ctDNA testing on an expanded gene panel has the potential to advance our knowledge of the mechanisms underlying treatment resistance in SCLC and aid in the development of novel treatment strategies.

Abstract 1277: Honokiol, a natural product, overcomes acquired resistance of EGFR mutant NSCLC cells to the third generation EGFR inhibitor, osimertinib

Osimertinib (AZD9291) is a FDA-approved EGFR inhibitor for treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with activating EGFR mutations (first-line) or those who have become resistant to 1st generation EGFR inhibitors through the T790M mutation (second-line). The development of acquired resistance to osimertinib limits the long-term benefits of patients, and effective treatment options are urgently needed. We have identified that honokiol, a natural product with potential antitumor activity, may be used to overcome osimertinib resistance. In several osimertinib-resistant cell lines including HCC827/AR, PC-9/AR, PC-9/GR/AR and PC-9/3M (with EGFR 19del, T790M and C797S mutations), the combination of honokiol and osimertinib had synergistic effects on decreasing the survival of these cell lines. The combination inhibited cell colony formation and growth, and augmented induction of apoptosis of resistant cells. This combination enhanced reduction of Mcl-1, a critical mechanism by which osimertinib induces apoptosis in sensitive EGFR mutant NSCLC cells; this effect is likely due to enhanced Mcl-1 degradation since Mcl-1 was degraded much faster in cells exposed to the combination of honokiol and osimertinib than in DMSO-treated control cells. Moreover enforced overexpression of ectopic Mcl-1 abolished the enhanced effect of honokiol and osimertinib combination on induction of apoptosis, supporting a critical role of Mcl-1 reduction in inducing apoptosis of the osimertinib-resistant cells by this combination. Our findings warrant further study of this combination for overcoming osimertinib-resistance in vivo and potentially in the clinic. (This work was supported by the NIH/NCI R01 CA223220 to SYS and Winship lung cancer pilot award to SYS).

Citation Format: Hongjing ZANG, Songqing Fan, Jack Arbiser, Taofeek K. Owonikoko, Suresh S. Ramalingam, Shi-Yong Sun. Honokiol, a natural product, overcomes acquired resistance of EGFR mutant NSCLC cells to the third generation EGFR inhibitor, osimertinib [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1277.

Abstract 77: Therapeutic potential of ERK inhibitors in overcoming acquired resistance to third generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activating mutations, 90% of which present as an exon 19 deletion (Del19) or exon 21 point mutation (L858R), with first and second generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs; e.g., erlotinib and afatinib) and T790M resistant mutation with third generation EGFR-TKIs (e.g., AZD9291 or osimertinib) has provided significant clinical benefit in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) carrying these mutations. AZD9291 selectively and irreversibly inhibits EGFR activating and T790M mutants while sparing wild-type EGFR. It is now an approved therapeutic option for NSCLC patients with activating EGFR mutations (first-line) or those who have become resistant to the 1st generation EGFR-TKIs through the T790M mutation (second-line). Unfortunately, all patients eventually relapsed and developed resistance to AZD9291 treatment, limiting the long-term benefit of this targeted therapy. Hence the effective strategies that can overcome the resistance are urgently needed in the clinic. We have recently demonstrated that modulation of MEK/ERK-dependent Bim and Mcl-1 degradation critically mediates sensitivity and resistance of EGFR-mutant NSCLC cells to AZD9291 and loss of MEK/ERK-mediated Bim and Mcl-1 modulation is a key mechanism accounting for development of acquired resistance to AZD9291. Accordingly we have suggested that inhibition of the MEK/ERK signaling, which enforces Mcl-1 reduction and Bim elevation, might lower the threshold of AZD9291-resistant cells to re-respond to AZD9291 for undergoing apoptosis and achieve the goal of overcoming acquired resistance. Indeed, the combination of AZD9291 with a MEK inhibitor effectively decreases cell survival with enhanced apoptosis irrespectively of resistant mechanisms and inhibited the growth of AZD9291-resistant xenografts in vivo as we recently reported. In the current study, we further show that the combination of AZD9291 with an ERK inhibitor synergistically decreased the survival of AZD9291-resistance cell lines with enhanced induction of apoptosis. Moreover, the combination of a MEK or ERK inhibitor with a first (e.g., erlotinib) or second (e.g., afatinib) generation EGFR-TKIs also very effectively decreased the survival of AZD9291-resistance cell lines although these cell lines were cross-resistant to first and second generation EGFR-TKIs. Therefore, our results have provided additional evidence supporting the notion that co-targeting the MEK/ERK signaling is an effective strategy for overcoming AZD9291 acquired resistance irrespectively of the underlying resistance mechanisms. Our findings warrant further investigation of this therapeutic strategy to overcome AZD9291 resistance in the clinic. (This study was supported by the NIH/NCI R01 CA223220 and Winship lung cancer pilot award)

Citation Format: Yiting Li, Guoqing Qian, Taofeek K. Owonikoko, Suresh S. Ramalingam, Shi-Yong Sun. Therapeutic potential of ERK inhibitors in overcoming acquired resistance to third generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 77.

Abstract 73: Inhibition of ACK1 delays and overcomes acquired resistance of EGFR mutant NSCLC cells to the third generation EGFR inhibitor, osimertinib

The approval of osimertinib (AZD9291) as a third generation EGFR inhibitor for treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with activating EGFR mutations (first-line) or those who have become resistant to 1st generation EGFR inhibitors through the T790M mutation (second-line) have generated tremendous benefits to these NSLCL patients. However, the unavoidable development of acquired resistance to osimertinib limits the long-term benefits of patients. Thus, effective treatment options are urgently needed. Activated Cdc42-associated kinase 1 or ACK1 (also named as TNK2) is a non-receptor tyrosine kinase with oncogenic function. Although ACK1 gene is amplified in lung squamous cell carcinoma, its involvement in lung cancer including regulation of drug resistance has largely not been investigated. We found that inhibition of ACK1 with (R)-9bMS, a specific ACK1 inhibitor, synergized with AZD9291 in inhibiting the growth of EGFR mutant NSCLC cell lines. Similar results were also generated when ACK1 is genetically inhibited through transient shRNA gene knockdown. The combination of AZD9291 and (R)-9bMS enhanced induction of apoptosis as evaluated by detecting annexin V-positive cells with flow cytometry and PARP cleavage using Western blotting. In an in vitro long-term resistance delay assay, the combination of (R)-9bMS and AZD9291 clearly prevented the emergence of AZD9291-resistance as evaluating resistant cell colony formation and growth. Beyond the combination was also effective in inhibiting the growth of EGFR mutant NSCLC cell lines with acquired resistance to AZD9291. In some resistant cell lines, the combinations induced senescence in addition to induction of apoptosis. These preliminary findings suggest that ACK1 inhibition might be a potential and innovative strategy for preventing and overcoming AZD9291 acquired resistance. Hence further in vivo and mechanistic studies are warranted. (This work was supported by the NIH/NCI R01 CA223220 and Winship lung cancer pilot award to SYS; NIH/NCI R01 CA208258, Bankhead Coley Award-6BC08 and Prostate Cancer Foundation (PCF) Challenge award-17CHAL06 to NPM).

Citation Format: Jiajia Gu, Xia He, Nupam P. Mahajan, Taofeek K. Owonikoko, Suresh S. Ramalingam, Shi-Yong Sun. Inhibition of ACK1 delays and overcomes acquired resistance of EGFR mutant NSCLC cells to the third generation EGFR inhibitor, osimertinib [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 73.

Abstract CT225: A Phase Ib/IIa randomized pilot study to investigate the safety and tolerability of autologous T-cells with enhanced T-cell receptors specific to NY-ESO-1/LAGE-1a (GSK3377794) alone, or in combination with pembrolizumab, in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Introduction: There is a high unmet medical need for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have failed platinum-based chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibitors. Only 10% of such patients receive any benefit from current therapies, and novel therapies are needed to improve outcomes. Preclinical data support the efficacy, specificity and possible safety of NYESO1/LAGE1a T-cell receptor-engineered patient Tcells (GSK3377794) in NSCLC. Pembrolizumab (PEM) is a monoclonal antibody, which specifically blocks PD1/PDL1 interaction, thereby increasing the antitumor function of Tcells. Thus, the combination of GSK3377794 and PEM may work synergistically due to the inhibition of PD1/PD-L1 signaling on GSK3377794 and other T-cells, potentially further improving the therapeutic effect.

Methods: This is a Phase Ib/IIa randomized, multiarm, openlabel pilot study (NCT03709706) in human leukocyte antigen (HLA)A*02:01, HLAA*02:05 and/or HLAA*02:06 adult patients (aged &gt;18 years) whose tumors express NYESO1 and/or LAGE1a. This study aims to enroll up to 44 patients with unresectable Stage IIIb or Stage IV NSCLC who were either ineligible for definitive chemoradiotherapy, have recurrent disease which has progressed during or after platinumbased chemotherapy with or without anti-PD-1 agents, have terminated prior treatment due to intolerable side effects, or have refused standard approved treatment. Patients will be randomized (1:1) to two treatment arms. Arm A will receive GSK3377794 as monotherapy, administered as a single intravenous (IV) infusion; Arm B will receive GSK3377794 as a single IV infusion on Day 1 followed by PEM 200 mg initiated on Day 22 and continued for up to 35 cycles or until disease progression. Patients in Arm A who progress after receiving GSK3377794 monotherapy will be offered antiPD1 therapy at the same dose and duration as Arm B. The study will use a Bayesian adaptive design, wherein enrollment can be halted in either arm for futility. The patient journey will consist of 3 parts: patients will undergo eligibility screening (Part 1), followed by leukapheresis (Part 2), after which patients will enter the Interventional Phase (Part 3) during which patients will receive preparative lymphodepleting chemotherapy followed by infusion of GSK3377794. The first patient was screened on December 31, 2018.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03709706

Study is funded by GlaxoSmithKline and is in collaboration with Merck & Co., Inc.

Citation Format: Karen L. Reckamp, Wallace Akerley, Martin J. Edelman, Balazs Halmos, Kai He, Melissa Johnson, Raja Mudad, Joel W. Neal, Taofeek K. Owonikoko, Jyoti D. Patel, Sandip P. Patel, Jonathan W. Riess, Adrian G. Sacher, Simon Turcotte, Liza C. Villaruz, Marjorie G. Zauderer, Benedetto Farsaci, Aisha Hasan, Roma Patel, Yuehui Wu, Michael Chisamore, Vincent Lam. A Phase Ib/IIa randomized pilot study to investigate the safety and tolerability of autologous T-cells with enhanced T-cell receptors specific to NY-ESO-1/LAGE-1a (GSK3377794) alone, or in combination with pembrolizumab, in advanced non-small cell lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT225.

Survival Outcomes With Thoracic Radiotherapy in Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the National Cancer Database

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung carcinoma (ES-SCLC) is poor. The benefit of consolidative thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) in ES-SCLC has been inconclusive, and its use inconsistent. The objective of this study was to evaluate overall survival (OS) of ES-SCLC patients treated with chemotherapy (CT) with or without TRT using an administrative database approach.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried to identify patients with ES-SCLC diagnosed between 2010 and 2014. Those with brain metastases, those who received radiotherapy before CT, or radiotherapy outside the thorax, were excluded. Propensity score-matching (PSM) was used to compare OS of patients treated with CT and TRT with those who received CT alone. Patients who received >10 radiotherapy fractions were also compared with those who received 10 or fewer.

RESULTS

We included 14,367 patients in the primary analysis; 12,019 received CT alone, and 2348 received CT with TRT. In multivariate analysis, CT was associated with an increased risk of death relative to CT with TRT (hazard ratio [HR], 1.74 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.64-1.84]; log-rank P < .001), which remained significant with PSM. Median OS was 12.1 versus 8.2 months (CT with TRT vs. CT); 12-month OS was 50.5% versus 28.5%, and 5-year OS 7.6% versus 2.0% (HR, 1.80 [95% CI, 1.67-1.95], HR P < .001). Of 3099 patients who received TRT, >10 radiotherapy fractions was associated with superior OS (HR, 1.70 [95% CI, 1.49-1.95], log-rank P < .001); this finding remained significant with PSM.

CONCLUSION

Use of TRT after CT in ES-SCLC patients was associated with long-term survival; its use should be considered in addition to standard of care CT.

Enrollment of Racial Minorities in Clinical Trials: Old Problem Assumes New Urgency in the Age of Immunotherapy

Minority U.S. populations are underrepresented in cancer clinical trials. This review appraises the impact of the disparity in clinical trial participation by minority patients in the current era of cancer immunotherapy. Enrollment on pivotal trials leading to U.S. regulatory approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors showed poor representation of minority ethnic groups. Specifically, we found that black patients constitute less than 4% of all patients enrolled across multiple trials that supported the approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of lung cancer. Similar underrepresentation was observed for trials conducted in renal cell carcinoma and other tumor types. Since efficacy of immunotherapy is only observed in a subset of patients, the use of predictive biomarkers to identify responders along with new strategies to expand the benefit to a larger subset of patients are current areas of active investigation. The inadequate representation of minority patients on immunotherapy clinical trials could perpetuate outcome disparity because the unique biology of the host and the tumors from this subpopulation is not accounted for as new treatment algorithms to guide optimal use of immunotherapy are developed for use in the real world.

Inositol-triphosphate 3-kinase B confers cisplatin resistance by regulating NOX4-dependent redox balance

How altered metabolism contributes to chemotherapy resistance in cancer cells remains unclear. Through a metabolism-related kinome RNAi screen, we identified inositol-trisphosphate 3-kinase B (ITPKB) as a critical enzyme that contributes to cisplatin-resistant tumor growth. We demonstrated that inositol 1,3,4,5-tetrakisphosphate (IP4), the product of ITPKB, plays a critical role in redox homeostasis upon cisplatin exposure by reducing cisplatin-induced ROS through inhibition of a ROS-generating enzyme, NADPH oxidase 4 (NOX4), which promotes cisplatin-resistant tumor growth. Mechanistically, we identified that IP4 competes with the NOX4 cofactor NADPH for binding and consequently inhibits NOX4. Targeting ITPKB with shRNA or its small-molecule inhibitor resulted in attenuation of NOX4 activity, imbalanced redox status, and sensitized cancer cells to cisplatin treatment in patient-derived xenografts. Our findings provide insight into the crosstalk between kinase-mediated metabolic regulation and platinum-based chemotherapy resistance in human cancers. Our study also suggests a distinctive signaling function of IP4 that regulates NOX4. Furthermore, pharmaceutical inhibition of ITPKB displayed synergistic attenuation of tumor growth with cisplatin, suggesting ITPKB as a promising synthetic lethal target for cancer therapeutic intervention to overcome cisplatin resistance.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with weekly versus triweekly cisplatin in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Comparative analysis

BACKGROUND

Cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy is standard of care for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. This systemic review compared efficacy and safety of weekly vs triweekly cisplatin in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

METHODS

Among 1500 prospective studies published from 1970 to 2015, 39 (18 weekly, 21 triweekly) including 3668 patients qualified for inclusion. Clinical outcomes were analyzed using weighted estimates and 2-tailed t test for comparisons; significance level was 0.05.

RESULTS

Locoregional control was 58% (CI 53%-63%) vs 61% (CI 56%-65%; P = .7). The 2-year overall survival (OS) was 74% (CI 66%-80%) for weekly vs 67% (64%-69%) triweekly groups (P = .67). The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 69% (CI 59%-77%) for weekly vs 62% (CI 58%-65%) triweekly groups (P = .9). Grade 3 to 5 toxicities were 36% vs 40% (P = .37) in weekly vs triweekly groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly cisplatin was comparable in efficacy and safety to the triweekly regimen. Our analysis supports the use of weekly or triweekly cisplatin in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, with tolerability being a key factor in selection.

Evaluation of preclinical efficacy of everolimus and pasireotide in thyroid cancer cell lines and xenograft models

BACKGROUND

Signaling through mTOR and somatostatin pathway is implicated in thyroid cancer development.

METHOD

We evaluated everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor and pasireotide, a multi receptor somatostatin analogue as potential therapy of thyroid cancer focusing on the in vitro and in vivo efficacy, as well as possible mechanism to explain any observed interaction.

RESULTS

Both everolimus and pasireotide inhibit the growth of thyroid cancer cell lines in vitro with varied efficacy that correlates with tumor origin and somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression profile of the cell lines. In vitro activity of everolimus show positive correlation with the expression of SSTR types 1, 4 and 5 (CC: 0.9; 0.85, 0.87) while pasireotide activity show negative correlation with SSTR2 (CC: -0.87). Although there is greater modulation of pS6 when pasireotide is combined with everolimus, there is no significant abrogation of the expected feedback upregulation of AKT induced by everolimus. Also, the combination is not significantly better than each agent alone in short and long term in vitro assays. Continuous administration of everolimus at a low dose as opposed to high intermittent dosing schedule has greater antitumor efficacy against thyroid cancer xenografts in vivo. Pasireotide LAR has modest in vivo efficacy and the combination of everolimus and pasireotide LAR achieve greater tumor growth inhibition than each agent alone in TPC-1 xenograft model of thyroid cancer (p = 0.048).

CONCLUSION

Our findings provide support for the clinical evaluation of everolimus and pasireotide in thyroid cancer and other neuroendocrine tumors.

Randomized Phase II Trial of Cisplatin and Etoposide in Combination With Veliparib or Placebo for Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: ECOG-ACRIN 2511 Study

PURPOSE

Veliparib, a poly (ADP ribose) polymerase inhibitor, potentiated standard chemotherapy against small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) in preclinical studies. We evaluated the combination of veliparib with cisplatin and etoposide (CE; CE+V) doublet in untreated, extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with ES-SCLC, stratified by sex and serum lactate dehydrogenase levels, were randomly assigned to receive four 3-week cycles of CE (75 mg/m² intravenously on day 1 and 100 mg/m² on days 1 through 3) along with veliparib (100 mg orally twice per day on days 1 through 7) or placebo (CE+P). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Using an overall one-sided 0.10-level log-rank test, the study had 88% power to demonstrate a 37.5% reduction in the PFS hazard rate.

RESULTS

A total of 128 eligible patients received treatment on protocol. The median age was 66 years, 52% of patients were men, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 0 for 29% of patients and 1 for 71%. The respective median PFS for the CE+V arm versus the CE+P arm was 6.1 versus 5.5 months (unstratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.75 [one-sided P = .06]; stratified HR, 0.63 [one-sided P = .01]), favoring CE+V. The median overall survival was 10.3 versus 8.9 months (stratified HR, 0.83; 80% CI, 0.64 to 1.07; one-sided P = .17) for the CE+V and CE+P arms, respectively. The overall response rate was 71.9% versus 65.6% (two-sided P = .57) for CE+V and CE+P, respectively. There was a significant treatment-by-strata interaction in PFS: Male patients with high lactate dehydrogenase levels derived significant benefit (PFS HR, 0.34; 80% CI, 0.22 to 0.51) but there was no evidence of benefit among patients in other strata (PFS HR, 0.81; 80% CI, 0.60 to 1.09). The following grade ≥ 3 hematology toxicities were more frequent in the CE+V arm than the CE+P arm: CD4 lymphopenia (8% v 0%; P = .06) and neutropenia (49% v 32%; P = .08), but treatment delivery was comparable.

CONCLUSION

The addition of veliparib to frontline chemotherapy showed signal of efficacy in patients with ES-SCLC and the study met its prespecified end point.

MAST1 Drives Cisplatin Resistance in Human Cancers by Rewiring cRaf-Independent MEK Activation

Platinum-based chemotherapeutics represent a mainstay of cancer therapy, but resistance limits their curative potential. Through a kinome RNAi screen, we identified microtubule-associated serine/threonine kinase 1 (MAST1) as a main driver of cisplatin resistance in human cancers. Mechanistically, cisplatin but no other DNA-damaging agents inhibit the MAPK pathway by dissociating cRaf from MEK1, while MAST1 replaces cRaf to reactivate the MAPK pathway in a cRaf-independent manner. We show clinical evidence that expression of MAST1, both initial and cisplatin-induced, contributes to platinum resistance and worse clinical outcome. Targeting MAST1 with lestaurtinib, a recently identified MAST1 inhibitor, restores cisplatin sensitivity, leading to the synergistic attenuation of cancer cell proliferation and tumor growth in human cancer cells and patient-derived xenograft models.

Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase II Study of Temozolomide in Combination With Either Veliparib or Placebo in Patients With Relapsed-Sensitive or Refractory Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Purpose Both temozolomide (TMZ) and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are active in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). This phase II, randomized, double-blind study evaluated whether addition of the PARP inhibitor veliparib to TMZ improves 4-month progression-free survival (PFS). Patients and Methods A total of 104 patients with recurrent SCLC were randomly assigned 1:1 to oral veliparib or placebo 40 mg twice daily, days 1 to 7, and oral TMZ 150 to 200 mg/m2/day, days 1 to 5, of a 28-day cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Response was determined by imaging at weeks 4 and 8, and every 8 weeks thereafter. Improvement in PFS at 4 months was the primary end point. Secondary objectives included overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety and tolerability of veliparib with TMZ. Exploratory objectives included PARP-1 and SLFN11 immunohistochemical expression, MGMT promoter methylation, and circulating tumor cell quantification. Results No significant difference in 4-month PFS was noted between TMZ/veliparib (36%) and TMZ/placebo (27%; P = .19); median OS was also not improved significantly with TMZ/veliparib (8.2 months; 95% CI, 6.4 to 12.2 months; v 7.0 months; 95% CI, 5.3 to 9.5 months; P = .50). However, ORR was significantly higher in patients receiving TMZ/veliparib compared with TMZ/placebo (39% v 14%; P = .016). Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia more commonly occurred with TMZ/veliparib: 50% versus 9% and 31% versus 7%, respectively. Significantly prolonged PFS (5.7 v 3.6 months; P = .009) and OS (12.2 v 7.5 months; P = .014) were observed in patients with SLFN11-positive tumors treated with TMZ/veliparib. Conclusion Four-month PFS and median OS did not differ between the two arms, whereas a significant improvement in ORR was observed with TMZ/veliparib. SLFN11 expression was associated with improved PFS and OS in patients receiving TMZ/veliparib, suggesting a promising biomarker of PARP-inhibitor sensitivity in SCLC.

PD-1 Blockade with Cemiplimab in Advanced Cutaneous Squamous-Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

No systemic therapies have been approved for the treatment of advanced cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma. This cancer may be responsive to immune therapy, because the mutation burden of the tumor is high and the disease risk is strongly associated with immunosuppression. In the dose-escalation portion of the phase 1 study of cemiplimab, a deep and durable response was observed in a patient with metastatic cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma.

METHODS

We report the results of the phase 1 study of cemiplimab for expansion cohorts of patients with locally advanced or metastatic cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma, as well as the results of the pivotal phase 2 study for a cohort of patients with metastatic disease (metastatic-disease cohort). In both studies, the patients received an intravenous dose of cemiplimab (3 mg per kilogram of body weight) every 2 weeks and were assessed for a response every 8 weeks. In the phase 2 study, the primary end point was the response rate, as assessed by independent central review.

RESULTS

In the expansion cohorts of the phase 1 study, a response to cemiplimab was observed in 13 of 26 patients (50%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 30 to 70). In the metastatic-disease cohort of the phase 2 study, a response was observed in 28 of 59 patients (47%; 95% CI, 34 to 61). The median follow-up was 7.9 months in the metastatic-disease cohort of the phase 2 study. Among the 28 patients who had a response, the duration of response exceeded 6 months in 57%, and 82% continued to have a response and to receive cemiplimab at the time of data cutoff. Adverse events that occurred in at least 15% of the patients in the metastatic-disease cohort of the phase 2 study were diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, constipation, and rash; 7% of the patients discontinued treatment because of an adverse event.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with advanced cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma, cemiplimab induced a response in approximately half the patients and was associated with adverse events that usually occur with immune checkpoint inhibitors. (Funded by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT02383212 and NCT02760498 .).