International standardisation work on the measurement of radon in air and water

Radon is considered to be the main source of human exposure to natural radiation. As stated by the World Health Organization, the exposure due to the inhalation of indoor radon is much greater than the one via the ingestion of water as radon degasses from water during handling. In response to these concerns about the universal presence of radon, environmental assessment studies are regularly commissioned to assess the radon exposure of public and workers. The credibility of such studies relies on the quality and reliability of radon analysis as well as on the sample representativeness of the radiological situation. The standard-setting approach, based on consensus, seemed to lend itself to a settlement of technical aspects of potential comparison. At present, two Working Groups of the International Standardization Organization are focussing on drafting standards on radon and its decay products measurement in air and water. These standards, which aim for a set of rigorous metrology practices, will be useful for persons in charge of the initial characterisation of a site with respect to natural radioactivity as well as to those performing the routine surveillance of specific sites.

Recognising anaemia and malnutrition in vascular patients with critical limb ischaemia

INTRODUCTION

Anaemia is a common problem in surgical patients. Patients with critical limb ischaemia (CLI) suffer chronic inflammation, repeated infection, require intervention, and can have a protracted hospital stay. The aims of this study were to assess anaemia and nutritional status in patients presenting with CLI.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two observational studies were undertaken, initially a retrospective series of 27 patients with CLI. Patient demographics, clinical details, transfusion status and in-patient laboratory haemoglobin values (Hb) were recorded. In a prospective series of 32 patients, laboratory markers to identify the cause for anaemia were assessed. Further nutritional status was assessed by records of height, weight, body mass index and a validated scoring system.

RESULTS

In the retrospective series, 15 patients (56%) were anaemic. Ten (37%) were transfused a median of 2 units (range, 2-13), a total of 35 units. Patients who were transfused had lower Hb on admission (P = 0.0019), most were anaemic on admission (90%). At discharge, most patients were anaemic (n = 23; 83%). In the prospective series of 32 patients, 20 (63%) were anaemic. Nutritional assessment was performed on 18, only seven patients were scored undernourished. This was increased to 23 by an independent assessor. Anaemia was associated with malnutrition (n = 17; P = 0.049) and an increased hospital stay (mean 25 days [SD 16] vs mean 12 days [SD 8], P = 0.0125; total 513 vs 144 bed days).

CONCLUSIONS

Anaemia and poor nutrition are common and not recognised in vascular patients presenting with critical limb ischaemia. Anaemia is associated with and increased length of hospital stay.

Role of autologous stem cell transplant after induction therapy with bortezomib-lenolidomide or bortezomib-thalidomide in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients

8596

Background: The introduction of novel therapeutic options with bortezomib and immunomodulatory agents in the up-front management of multiple myeloma (MM) has significantly improved induction response rates. However, the role of high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) after induction with these highly active agents is not known, especially in patients with only a partial response to induction therapy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 95 newly diagnosed MM patients treated with induction bortezomib-lenolidomide-dexamethasone (BLD) or bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone (BTD) prior to ASCT. Responses were graded according to IMWG criteria. Results: 19 patients received BLD and 76 patients received BTD. All patients were conditioned with a melphalan-based regimen. Of the 19 patients who underwent induction with BLD, complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR) and partial response (PR) were achieved in 2 (11%), 8 (42%) and 9 (47%) respectively for an overall response rate (ORR) of 19/19 (100%). After ASCT, CR, VGPR and PR were achieved in 9 (47%), 5 (26%) and 5 (26%) respectively for a continued ORR of 21/21 (100%). Notably, 4/8 (50%) of patients with a VGPR after induction therapy with BLD improved to a CR after ASCT. 3/9 (33%) of patients with an initial PR to BLD improved to a CR and 1/9 (11%) with a PR improved to VGPR after ASCT. Of the 76 patients who underwent induction with BTD, CR, VGPR and PR were achieved in 6 (8%), 37 (49%) and 31(41%) respectively for an ORR of 74/76 (97%). 1 patient had stable disease and 1 patient had progressive disease. After ASCT, 27/76 (36%) achieved a CR, 30/76 (39%) a VGPR and 18/76 (24%) a PR for an ORR of 75/76 (99%). Of the patients who initially had a VGPR to BTD 16/37 (43%) improved to a CR while 5/32(16%)of PR patients improved to a CR and 9/32 (28%) of PR patients improved to a VGPR. Conclusions: Of the 40 patients who only achieved a PR after induction therapy with BLD or BTD, 16 (40%) had further improvement to a CR or VGPR after ASCT. Thus there is a significant benefit of ASCT in these patients who initially demonstrate relative resistance to induction therapy with highly active regimens.

[Table: see text]