Abciximab during Rescue Angioplasty after Failed Thrombolysis

Abciximab (a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor) was assessed in 16 of 36 patients with acute myocardial infarction who were referred for rescue angioplasty after failed thrombolysis. Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were comparable in the abciximab and non-abciximab groups. Coronary stenting was carried out in all patients in the non-abciximab group and in 13 in the abciximab group. Angiographic success was achieved in all patients. Persistence of slow flow was encountered more frequently in the non-abciximab group (30% versus 6.25%, p < 0.05). Stent thrombosis occurred in 2 patients (10%) who were successfully redilated and there was one case of bleeding requiring transfusion in the non-abciximab group; neither of these complications occurred in the abciximab group. Predischarge left ventricular ejection fraction was better in the abciximab group (44% ± 3% versus 36% ± 3%, p < 0.01). All patients were discharged alive and were asymptomatic at the one-month follow-up. Use of abciximab during angioplasty after failed thrombolysis improved angiographic and clinical results without increasing the risk of bleeding, and reduced the incidence of in-hospital complications. Larger studies are warranted to confirm this important observation.

Pathology of Severe Mitral Regurgitation following Balloon Valvuloplasty

This study assessed the mechanism of acute mitral regurgitation following balloon mitral valvuloplasty for the treatment of symptomatic mitral stenosis. We studied 25 patients who required mitral valve replacement for severe mitral regurgitation following balloon mitral valvuloplasty. All the mitral valves studied had features of severe mitral stenosis. Radial tear of the mitral leaflet was responsible for mitral regurgitation in 18 (72%) cases. Of these, 16 involved the anterior mitral leaflet and in 2 cases the posterior mitral leaflet was torn. Three patients (12%) had chordal rupture, whereas in 4 (16%) patients pseudo-orifices were formed. All the excised mitral valves showed significant subvalvular deformity which was underestimated in prevalvuloplasty echocardiography. No other factor was found to be associated with disruption of the valve. Hence, we conclude that cusp deformity and subvalvular pathology are responsible for faulty transmission of forces and improper engagement of the balloon, resulting in disruption of the valvular apparatus. The incidence of severe mitral regurgitation following balloon mitral valvuloplasty might be decreased by appropriate prevalvuloplasty assessment and patient selection.

Recurrent chest pain after treatment of spontaneous coronary artery dissection: An enigma

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a rare entity. It has been described in various settings like pregnancy, collagen vascular diseases, cocaine abuse, heavy exercise, variant angina, eosinophilic arteritis, or fibro muscular dysplasia. It is also easy to miss a dissection during angiography, as the typical radiolucent lumen seen in coronary angiography may be absent in many cases. In this report, we describe the case of a 35-year-old female who presented with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction due to spontaneous coronary dissection. She had been having episodic chest pain for one year and had been seen by two different cardiologists but was thought to have non-cardiac symptoms. Even during the index hospitalization, she underwent coronary angiography three times before coronary dissection could be identified as the cause of her symptoms. She underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery uneventfully. However, even after myocardial revascularization, she has had multiple episodes of chest pain requiring hospitalization. However, we have not been able to find a specific cause for it and the cause of her recurrent chest pain remains an enigma. This case highlights the problems, which arise while managing a case of SCAD. More research is needed to find the exact etiology and long-term prognosis of this condition.

The Indian consensus guidance on stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: An emphasis on practical use of nonvitamin K oral anticoagulants

The last ten years have seen rapid strides in the evolution of nonvitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). For the preparation of this consensus, a comprehensive literature search was performed and data on available trials, subpopulation analyses, and case reports were analyzed. This Indian consensus document intends to provide guidance on selecting the right NOAC for the right patients by formulating expert opinions based on the available trials and Asian/Indian subpopulation analyses of these trials. A section has been dedicated to the current evidence of NOACs in the Asian population. Practical suggestions have been formulated in the following clinical situations: (i) Dose recommendations of the NOACs in different clinical scenarios; (ii) NOACs in patients with rheumatic heart disease (RHD); (iii) Monitoring anticoagulant effect of the NOACs; (iv) Overdose of NOACs; (v) Antidotes to NOACs; (vi) Treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) with AF using NOACs; (vii) NOACs dose in elderly, (viii) Switching between NOACs and vitamin K antagonists (VKA); (ix) Cardioversion or ablation in NOAC-treated patients; (x) Planned/emergency surgical interventions in patients currently on NOACs; (xi) Management of bleeding complications of NOACs; (xii) Management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in AF with NOACs; (xiii) Management of acute ischemic stroke while on NOACs.

Paclitaxel-Eluting versus Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents in Diabetes

BACKGROUND

The choice of drug-eluting stent in the treatment of patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease who are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been debated. Previous studies comparing paclitaxel-eluting stents with stents eluting rapamycin (now called sirolimus) or its analogues (everolimus or zotarolimus) have produced contradictory results, ranging from equivalence between stent types to superiority of everolimus-eluting stents.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 1830 patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease who were undergoing PCI to receive either a paclitaxel-eluting stent or an everolimus-eluting stent. We used a noninferiority trial design with a noninferiority margin of 4 percentage points for the upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval of the risk difference. The primary end point was target-vessel failure, which was defined as a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization at the 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

At 1 year, paclitaxel-eluting stents did not meet the criterion for noninferiority to everolimus-eluting stents with respect to the primary end point (rate of target-vessel failure, 5.6% vs. 2.9%; risk difference, 2.7 percentage points [95% confidence interval, 0.8 to 4.5]; relative risk, 1.89 [95% confidence interval, 1.20 to 2.99]; P=0.38 for noninferiority). There was a significantly higher 1-year rate in the paclitaxel-eluting stent group than in the everolimus-eluting stent group of target-vessel failure (P=0.005), spontaneous myocardial infarction (3.2% vs. 1.2%, P=0.004), stent thrombosis (2.1% vs. 0.4%, P=0.002), target-vessel revascularization (3.4% vs. 1.2%, P=0.002), and target-lesion revascularization (3.4% vs. 1.2%, P=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease undergoing PCI, paclitaxel-eluting stents were not shown to be noninferior to everolimus-eluting stents, and they resulted in higher rates of target-vessel failure, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and target-vessel revascularization at 1 year. (Funded by Boston Scientific; TUXEDO-India Clinical Trials Registry-India number, CTRI/2011/06/001830).

Effectiveness of Ventricular Intrinsic Preference (VIP™) and Ventricular AutoCapture (VAC) algorithms in pacemaker patients: Results of the validate study

BACKGROUND

Several past clinical studies have demonstrated that frequent and unnecessary right ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome and compromised atrio-ventricular conduction (AVC) produces long-term adverse effects. The safety and efficacy of two pacemaker algorithms, Ventricular Intrinsic Preference™ (VIP) and Ventricular AutoCapture (VAC), were evaluated in a multi-center study in pacemaker patients.

METHODS

We evaluated 80 patients across 10 centers in India. Patients were enrolled within 15 days of dual chamber pacemaker (DDDR) implantation, and within 45 days thereafter were classified to either a compromised AVC (cAVC) arm or an intact AVC (iAVC) arm based on intrinsic paced/sensed (AV/PV) delays. In each arm, patients were then randomized (1:1) into the following groups: VIP OFF and VAC OFF (Control group; CG), or VIP ON and VAC ON (Treatment Group; TG). Subsequently, the AV/PV delays in the CG groups were mandatorily programmed at 180/150 ms, and to up to 350 ms in the TG groups. The percentage of right ventricular pacing (%RVp) evaluated at 12-month post-implantation follow-ups were compared between the two groups in each arm. Additionally, in-clinic time required for collecting device data was compared between patients programmed with the automated AutoCapture algorithm activated (VAC ON) vs. the manually programmed method (VAC OFF).

RESULTS

Patients randomized to the TG with the VIP algorithm activated exhibited a significantly lower %RVp at 12 months than those in the CG in both the cAVC arm (39±41% vs. 97±3%; p=0.0004) and the iAVC arm (15±25% vs. 68±39%; p=0.0067). In-clinic time required to collect device data was less in patients with the VAC algorithm activated. No device-related adverse events were reported during the year-long study period.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study cohort, the use of the VIP algorithm significantly reduced the %RVp, while the VAC algorithm reduced in-clinic time needed to collect device data.

Medical Management and Diagnostic Testing among Stable Angina Patients in India: The STable Angina obseRvational (STAR) Registry

OBJECTIVE

To study the practice pattern in the management of patients with stable angina (SA) in India.

METHODS

The Stable Angina obseRvational Registry (STAR) prospectively enrolled patients provisionally diagnosed with SA by non-interventional practicing internists in India. Patients were followed for 3 months after enrollment to assess medical treatment, diagnostic management, and interventional treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD). At the study conclusion, a statistical analysis retrospectively categorized patients not at risk of CAD by the Morise-Jalisi scale though this was not part of the study protocol.

RESULTS

Between January and May 2012, 2079 patients were enrolled at 131 centres. Mean age was 57 ± 11 years, 62% were men, and 40% had a history of diabetes. Over 90% of patients completed follow-up visit, >85% received statins and antiplatelet medications, >70% received beta blockers, and >60% received angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers. Diagnostic testing rates were low: 93% for electrocardiogram, 44% echocardiogram, 42% chest radiography, 12% stress test, and 8% underwent noninvasive CT or invasive coronary angiography, of which, 86% had abnormal results. After the study, the Morise-Jalisi probability of CAD was intermediate in 42% and high in 51% of patients. Only 3.4% of all patients had coronary revascularization.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort of Indian patients with SA, disease severity and probability of CAD were high. Clinicians used evidence-based care for medical management, but underutilized diagnostic testing. Patients with SA in India need to be risk-stratified for probability and severity of CAD and, if indicated, receive additional diagnostic testing.

Comparison of anti-thrombotic strategies using Bivalirudin, Heparin plus Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and Unfractionated Heparin Monotherapy for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention - A single centre observational study

AIMS

The study was planned to compare Anti-thrombotic strategies for patients undergoing PCI in a real world population with an emphasis on occurrence of major bleeding, composite ischemic end points and economic outcomes.

METHODS

The present study is a single center, prospective, observational study in consecutive patients undergoing PCI at Fortis Escorts Heart Institute (FEHI) and describes Authors' experience with three different Anti-Thrombotic Strategies in a real world population. Patients were consecutively enrolled in the study and the choice of Anti-thrombotic strategy was left to individual operator(s) based on their own clinical judgment and patient's affordability. No specific inclusion/exclusion criteria were specified on the choice of Anti-Thrombotic Strategy.

RESULTS

A total 1453 patients were consecutively enrolled into the study and were followed telephonically after 30 days. 252 patients were treated with Bivalirudin (Angiomax) during PCI (17.3%), 430 (29.6%) patients were treated with Heparin plus GPI & remaining 771 (53.1%) were treated with Heparin monotherapy. Incidence of major bleeding was lowest in patients treated with Bivalirudin (1.59%) when compared to Heparin plus GPI (3.49%) and Heparin monotherapy (5.97%), p = 0.005 Bivalirudin vs. Heparin Monotherapy, and p = 0.145, Bivalirudin vs. Heparin + GPI. No bleeding was observed in STEMI patients treated with Bivalirudin compared to 7.4% in patients treated with GPI and 14.3% in patients treated with UFH. Similarly non-access site bleeding was lowest in patients treated with Bivalirudin. Only 4 patients (1.6%) treated with Bivalirudin required Blood transfusion compared to 25 in Heparin plus GPI (5.8%) and 38 (5%) in Heparin Monotherapy arm. In Composite Ischemic end-points, no "All-cause Mortality" was observed in Bivalirudin group compared to 2.8% in Heparin plus GPI. Early stent thrombosis was seen in 1 patient with Heparin plus GPI and none with Heparin monotherapy and Bivalirudin group. None of the patients underwent TLR (target lesion revascularization) and TVR (target vessel revascularization) within 30 days post procedure other than one early stent thrombosis reported with Heparin plus GPI. Cost of blood product transfusion was lower with Bivalirudin as compared to Heparin plus GP IIb/IIIa arm (p = 0.01) and with Heparin alone (p = 0.001). Due to lower complications including blood transfusions and reduced hospital stay in Bivalirudin group, these benefits outweigh the incremental cost due to higher acquisition cost of the drug.

CONCLUSION

Bivalirudin use during PCI is associated with a distinct advantage of having lower access site and non-access site bleeding without compromising on the efficacy. We observed a reduction in blood transfusions, hospital stay and mortality for patients treated with Bivalirudin compared with Heparin plus GPI or Heparin Monotherapy. Bivalirudin can be safely adopted into our Institutional protocol for the treatment of high risk PCI such as STEMI, ACS, and Complex elective PCI.

Safety of Prasugrel in Indian patients - multicentric registry of 1000 cases

BACKGROUND

Clopidogrel has been the only available antiplatelet drug used along with aspirin in patients of ACS. In recent years 2 new antiplatelet drugs (Prasugrel and Ticagrelor) have become available. Prasugrel in the dose of 10 mg OD has been found to be more efficacious but with increased risk of major bleeding. For this reason it has not gained widespread usage in ACS patients undergoing PCI. There are no systematic data on the use of Prasugrel in Indian population.

METHOD

This is a prospective, multicentric, hospital registry of 1000 patients with ACS undergoing PCI who were administered Prasugrel. The primary safety endpoint of this study was major and minor bleeding while the efficacy endpoint is the composite of CV death, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke up to 30 days after PCI. Patients with high bleeding risk were excluded.

RESULTS

Most patients (91%) received loading dose of Prasugrel along with the maintenance dose getting according to the defined protocol. Patients were followed up to 30 days post procedure. Primary efficacy end point was reached in 3 patients only with two of them dying due to possible stent thrombosis and the third requiring revascularization of the target vessel for stent thrombosis. One major and 19 minor bleeding complications were recorded, with access site bleeding in 0.7% & non-access site bleeding in 1.2% of the subjects.

CONCLUSION

Prasugrel was found to be effective & not associated with a high incidence of bleeding in the high risk ACS patients when those at a high bleeding risk were excluded.

Three-year data from the XIENCE V INDIA study: safety and efficacy of XIENCE V in 1000 real world Indian patients

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease in Asia has reached epidemic proportions in recent years. Use of drug eluting stents in Asians has rapidly expanded with varying penetration rates across different countries. The XIENCE V INDIA Study included 'real world' patients who underwent XIENCE V stent implantation to assess short and intermediate term outcomes in Indian patients with diverse risk factors.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate 3-year clinical outcomes in a cohort of 'real world' Indian patients with CAD being treated with XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System.

METHODS

1000 patients were enrolled from 18 sites in India between June 2008 and March 2009. Patients were included if their index procedures were completed using only XIENCE V. There were no clinical or angiographic exclusions. An independent Clinical Events Committee adjudicated all endpoint-related events. The primary endpoint was stent thrombosis rate annually through to 3 years as defined by the Academic Research Consortium criteria. The co-primary endpoint was the composite rate of cardiac death and myocardial infarction at 1 year.

RESULTS

At 1-year the primary endpoint of definite/probable stent thrombosis rate was 0.51%. No additional very late stent thrombosis was reported through a 3-year follow up. The composite endpoint of cardiac death and any myocardial infarction was 1.9%, 2.7% and 3.1% at 1, 2 and 3 years respectively.

CONCLUSION

Despite the high risk population of coronary artery disease, the use of XIENCE V in 'real world' Indian patients was associated with very low clinical event rates upto three years of follow up.

Stent thrombosis with an aneurysm 7 years after a drug eluting stent implantation

We report a case of very late stent thrombosis 7 years post sirolimus eluting stent implantation presenting as ST elevation MI while on dual antiplatelet therapy. Angiography revealed an aneurysm at the proximal end of the stent. The patient was managed successfully by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with adjunct thrombus aspiration and intracoronary abciximab administration followed by deploying a mesh-covered stent MGuard. This very late complication is a rare presentation after a drug illuting stent (DES).

Adenosine induced coronary spasm – A rare presentation

Adenosine is commonly used as a pharmacological agent in myocardial perfusion imaging, as an antiarrhythmic agent, and in Cath Lab. during PCI for treating no reflow phenomenon. Coronary spasm has been reported following adenosine injection during stress imaging. We report a rare complication with ST segment elevation, following adenosine injection, given for treatment of supraventricular tachycardia.

Relative efficacy of bivalirudin versus heparin monotherapy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a network meta-analysis

In the absence of head-to-head clinical data, the objective of this study was to indirectly compare the efficacy and safety of a bivalirudin-based anticoagulation strategy with that of heparin monotherapy in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) intended for primary percutaneous coronary intervention. A systematic literature review was performed to identify randomized controlled trials to build a network of bivalirudin and heparin monotherapy strategies in STEMI patients using heparin, with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor as a common reference strategy. At 30 days, the bivalirudin-based strategy was expected to result in lower mortality rates than heparin monotherapy (odds ratio [OR], 0.55; credible limit [CrL], 0.32-0.95). This relationship was sustained at 1 year. At 30 days, the risk for stroke (OR, 0.88; CrL, 0.37-2.13), myocardial infarction (OR, 0.79; CrL, 0.40-1.55), and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction major and minor bleedings (OR, 0.66; CrL, 0.45-0.98) tended to be numerically reduced with bivalirudin in comparison with heparin monotherapy. For patients with STEMI intended for primary percutaneous coronary intervention, bivalirudin is associated with lower mortality rates in comparison with heparin monotherapy. This study suggests that bivalirudin is more effective and safer than heparin monotherapy and should therefore be preferred over heparin monotherapy.

Infective endocarditis in an Indian setup: Are we entering the 'modern' era?

Background:

The clinical profile of infective endocarditis (IE) has been continuously evolving over last 3-4 decades as highlighted by many studies from developed world.

Objectives:

To evaluate the recent changes in the spectrum and clinical profile, and outcome of IE in an Indian setup.

Materials and Methods:

This was a descriptive, cross-sectional study. Demographic, clinical, characteristics, treatment, and outcome were examined in ‘definite’ cases of IE admitted at our institute between July 2005 and December 2010.

Results:

61 ‘definite’ cases were identified. Mean patient age was 49.3 ± 13.7 years. Male to female ratio was 3.3:1. Rheumatic heart disease was the underlying heart disease in 23 (37.7%) patients. 33 (54.1%) patients had already received antibiotic therapy before presentation to us. Blood cultures were positive in 41 (67.2%) patients. Streptococci and staphylococci were the commonest microbial isolates, 9 (21.4%) patients each. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was done for all the patients. Vegetations were detected in 54 (88%) patients. Surgery was done in 30 (49.2%) patients. In-hospital mortality happened in 4 (6.5%) patients.

Conclusions:

We recorded several new trends, like: 1) an increasing age, 2) an increasing proportion of patients with no previously known heart disease, 3) improving culture positivity rates, 4) rise in staphylococcal infections, 5) increased usage of TEE, 6) high elective surgical rate, and 7) apparent improved survival rates. These changes point to the fact that ‘modern era’ changes in the profile of IE have started to appear in a selected population in India.

The paclitaxel-eluting PTCA-balloon in combination with a cobalt-chromium stent in two different sequences to treat de novo coronary artery lesions: an angiographic follow up study

INTRODUCTION

The paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter (DCB) based on the PACCOCATH(®) technology has yielded angiographic and clinical results superior to drug-eluting stents (DES) in situations like in-stent restenosis (ISR) and a trend towards superior results in small coronary vessels and side branches of coronary bifurcations. Using the DCB followed by cobalt-chromium stent (CoCr) deployment or with a reverse sequence may yield different outcomes in terms of late loss.

METHODS

97 patients with de-novo coronary stenosis (55.6 ± 10.7 years, 79.4% male, ≥70%, length: ≤25 mm, vessel diameter: 2.5-4.0 mm) were randomly treated with the DCB (3 μg/mm²) followed by a CoCr-stent or stent first and DCB later. Six-month angiographic and one-year clinical follow-up intention-to-treat analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Angiographic and demographic baseline data was comparable between the two groups. When comparing balloon first versus stent first technique, the primary outcome variables were not statistically different for mean in-segment (0.51 ± 0.56 mm vs. 0.36 ± 0.55 mm, p = 0.23) and in-stent (0.52 ± 0.55 mm vs. 0.46 ± 0.52 mm, p = 0.65) late lumen loss. The lesion related 12-month MACE rates were 5/49 (10.2%) and 2/48 (4.2%) (p = 0.44). Lesion related thrombotic events occurred in three patients in balloon first and in one patient in stent first group, two of which were associated with early discontinuation of continuous dual anti-platelet therapy, two with suboptimal PCI, and one each were performed in a thrombotic lesion and a bifurcation type 1.1.0.

CONCLUSION

Drug-coated balloon first followed by cobalt chromium stent deployment versus a reverse sequence is not associated with statistically significantly different 6-month angiographic or 12-month clinical outcomes.

One-year clinical outcomes of BioMatrix™-Biolimus A9™ eluting stent: the e-BioMatrix multicenter post marketing surveillance registry in India

OBJECTIVE

The e-BioMatrix is a post marketing multicenter registry with an objective to evaluate the 2 year clinical safety and efficacy outcomes in patients treated with BioMatrix™ - Biolimus A9™ (BA9™) drug eluting stents (DES).

BACKGROUND

Drug-eluting stents still have late-stage disadvantages that might be attributable to the permanent polymer. BioMatrix a new generation DES containing anti-proliferative drug Biolimus A9™ incorporating a biodegradable abluminal coating that leaves a polymer-free stent after drug release enhancing strut coverage while preventing neointimal hyperplasia.

METHODS

This interim analysis consists of a total of 1189 patients with 1418 lesions treated with BioMatrix stent who entered this multicenter registry in India. We analyzed the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and stent thrombosis (ST) at 1, 6, and 12 months with an extended follow-up of 2 years. Recommended antiplatelet regimen included clopidogrel and aspirin for 12 months.

RESULTS

The mean age was 57.6 ± 10.9 years, 81.8% were males, comorbidity index was 1.20 ± 1.33, 68% presented with acute coronary syndrome, 49% had hypertension and 40.8% had diabetes mellitus. One-year clinical follow-up was completed in 987 patients at the time of interim analysis. The incidence of MACE is 0.45 for 1544 person-year follow-up. There were only 03 cases of ST (01 late ST) reported during this time.

CONCLUSION

This registry demonstrates excellent one-year clinical safety and efficacy of BioMatrix stents. The 1-year result shows that BioMatrix stent may be a suitable alternative as compared to contemporary DESs which are currently available in the market for simple as well complex disease.