Magnetic resonance-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) hyperthermia for primary rectal cancer: A virtual feasibility analysis

77

Background: MR-HIFU Hyperthermia (HT) is a non-invasive treatment modality with real-time thermometry that ensures accurate and precise heating of a target with minimal effect on adjacent tissue. This energy deposition within a tumour can produce local bioeffects resulting in thermal chemo- and radiosensitization. MR-HIFU has been shown to be safe and feasible in a companion phase I study for recurrent rectal cancer. The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility of MR-HIFU in treating primary rectal tumours. Methods: With ethics approval, the anatomic characteristics and surrounding structures of rectal tumours diagnosed at Sunnybrook from 2014-2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Three orthogonal views of MR images were used to determine the potential ultrasound (US) beam path and organs at risk (OAR). In part 2 of the study, the gross tumour volume was delineated for 30 rectal tumours (10 low, mid &high). Image datasets were imported into the Sonalleve MR-HIFU workstation for virtual treatment simulation and planning to determine tumour targetability, coverage, optimal patient set-up, and transducer positioning. Results: Of the 105 tumours analyzed, 36, 52, and 17 were low, mid, and high, respectively. The average width of the acoustic window (sciatic notch) for the US beam path was 5.8 ± 1.4cm, average tumour length was 5.24 ± 2.0cm, and average beam path (skin to tumour edge) was 7.3 ± 1.9cm. Eighty one percent of tumours were ≤ 0.3cm from an OAR. Of the 24 virtually simulated tumours to date, 6/8 lower, 6/8 mid, and 1/8 upper rectal tumours were targetable by MR-HIFU. Conclusions: This is the first virtual analysis to evaluate MR-HIFU HT targetability in primary rectal cancer. Results from this study will support MR-HIFU HT as an option to enhance the treatment of primary rectal cancer. Acknowledgments: This study has been funded by the Canadian Cancer Society. Patient & tumour characteristics. [Table: see text]

A phase I study of MR-HIFU hyperthermia (HT) with radiation (RT) and chemotherapy (CT) for recurrent rectal cancer

78

Background: HT may improve cancer control and quality of life by sensitizing tumors to RT and CT. Inoperable recurrent rectal cancer has marginal outcomes with current retreatment regimens. We report the results from a first-in-human phase I study of MR-HIFU hyperthermia combined with RT and CT for recurrent rectal cancer. Methods: This ethics-approved study enrolled 6 patients fit for re-irradiation and chemotherapy; and with a MRI-visible and HIFU-accessible lesion. Patients received 30.6 Gy (17 fractions) and daily oral capecitabine, plus MR-HIFU HT immediately before RT on days 1, 8, and 15. Primary objectives were safety (acute toxicity) and treatment feasibility. Secondary objectives included late toxicity, pain palliation, quality of life, and radiologic response. HT was delivered with the Sonalleve MR-HIFU system on a 3T MRI. MR-based feedback control parameters were prescribed to achieve a mean temperature of 42.5°C in an 18 mm diameter target region for 30 minutes without exceeding 45°C. Results: One patient withdrew after completing 1/3 HT sessions due to scheduling and sedation difficulties. Five patients completed HT, RT and CT. There were no intraoperative complications, no adverse events or unintended tissue damage attributable to HT, RT, or CT. Table shows the best single continuous HT and mean temperatures (T90, T10), cumulative time in range (TIR), cumulative number of equivalent minutes at 43oC(CEM43) and day 90 imaging response. Sonication and MRI suite times were 36±13 and 226±78min. Conclusions: MR-HIFU HT was safely delivered in patients with recurrent rectal cancer. Treatment planning and patient set-up times decreased while beam-on time increased with experience. MR-HIFU HT combined with RT and CT appears feasible for primary tumours. Clinical trial information: NCT02528175. [Table: see text]

Results of 15 Gy HDR-BT boost plus EBRT in intermediate-risk prostate cancer: Analysis of over 500 patients

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE

To report biochemical control associated with single fraction 15 Gy high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) boost followed by external beam radiation (EBRT) in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all patients with intermediate-risk disease treated with a real-time ultrasound-based 15 Gy HDR-BT boost followed by EBRT between 2009 and 2016 at a single quaternary cancer center was performed. Freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF), cumulative incidence of androgen deprivation therapy use for biochemical or clinical failure post-treatment (CI of ADT) and metastasis-free survival (MFS) outcomes were measured.

RESULTS

518 patients met the inclusion criteria for this study. Median age at HDR-BT was 67 years (IQR 61-72). 506 (98%) had complete pathologic information available. Of these, 146 (28%) had favorable (FIR) and 360 (69%) had unfavorable (UIR) intermediate-risk disease. 83 (16%) received short course hormones with EBRT + HDR. Median overall follow-up was 5.2 years. FFBF was 91 (88-94)% at 5 years. Five-year FFBF was 94 (89-99)% and 89 (85-94)% in FIR and UIR patients, respectively (p = 0.045). CI of ADT was 4 (2-6)% at 5 years. Five-year CI of ADT was 1 (0-3)% and 5 (2-8)% in FIR and UIR patients, respectively (p = 0.085). MFS was 97 (95-98)% at 5 years. Five-year MFS was 100 (N/A-100)% and 95 (92-98)% in FIR and UIR patients, respectively (p = 0.020).

CONCLUSION

In this large cohort of intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients, 15 Gy HDR-BT boost plus EBRT results in durable biochemical control and low rates of ADT use for biochemical failure.

Unequivocal imaging of aluminium in human cells and tissues by an improved method using morin

Aluminium is biologically reactive and its ability to potentiate the immune response has driven its inclusion in both veterinary and human vaccines. Consequently, the need for unequivocal visualisation of aluminium in vivo has created a focused research effort to establish fluorescent molecular probes for this purpose. The most commonly used direct fluorescent labels for the detection of aluminium are morin (2',3,4',5,7-pentahydroxyflavone) and lumogallion [4-chloro-3-(2,4-dihydroxyphenylazo)-2-hydroxybenzene-1-sulphonic acid]. While the former has gained popularity in the detection of aluminium in plants and predominantly within root tips, the latter boasts greater sensitivity and selectivity for the detection of aluminium in human cells and tissues. Herein, we have developed a simplified morin staining protocol using the autofluorescence quenching agent, Sudan Black B. This modified protocol improves tissue morphology and increases analytical sensitivity, which allows intracellular aluminium to be detected in monocytes and when co-localised with senile plaques in human brain tissue of donors diagnosed with familial Alzheimer's disease. Overall, our results demonstrate a simple approach to minimise false positives in the use of morin to unequivocally detect aluminium in vivo.

Prostate-specific Antigen Bounce After Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Four Prospective Trials

AIMS

We conducted a pooled analysis of four prospective stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) trials of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer to evaluate the incidence of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) bounce and its correlation with the time-dose-fraction schedule. The correlation between bounce with PSA response at 4 years (nadir PSA < 0.4 ng/ml) and biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS) was also explored.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included four treatment groups: 35 Gy/five fractions once per week (QW) (TG-1; n = 84); 40 Gy/five fractions QW (TG-2; n = 100); 40 Gy/five fractions every other day (TG-3; n = 73); and 26 Gy/two fractions QW (TG-4; n = 30). PSA bounce was defined as a rise in PSA by 0.2 ng/ml (nadir + 0.2) or 2 ng/ml (nadir + 2.0) above nadir followed by a decrease back to nadir. Patients with fewer than three follow-up PSA tests were excluded from the pooled analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 287 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 5.0 years. The pooled 5-year cumulative incidence of bounce by nadir + 2.0 was 8%. The 2-year cumulative incidences of PSA bounce by nadir + 0.2 were 28.9, 21, 19.6 and 16.7% (P = 0.12) and by nadir + 2.0 were 7.2, 8, 2.7 and 6.7% (P = 0.32) for TG-1 to TG-4, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed that for nadir + 2.0, pre-treatment PSA (odds ratio 0.49; 95% confidence interval 0.26-0.97) correlated with PSA bounce. Although PSA bounce by nadir + 0.2 (odds ratio 0.10; 95% confidence interval 0.04-0.24) and nadir + 2.0 (odds ratio 0.29; 95% confidence interval 0.09-0.93) was associated with a lower probability of PSA response at 4 years, there was no association between bounce by nadir + 0.2 (hazard ratio 0.36; 95% confidence interval 0.08-1.74) or nadir + 2 (hazard ratio 1.77; 95% confidence interval 0.28-11.07) with BFFS.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of PSA bounce was independent of time-dose-fraction schedule for prostate SBRT. One in 13 patients experienced a bounce high enough to be misinterpreted as biochemical failure, and clinicians should avoid early salvage interventions in these patients. There was no association between PSA bounce and BFFS.

Absolute percentage of biopsied tissue positive for Gleason pattern 4 disease (APP4) appears predictive of disease control after high dose rate brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy in intermediate risk prostate cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To identify if, in intermediate risk prostate cancer (IR-PCa), the absolute percentage of biopsied tissue positive for pattern 4 disease (APP4) may be a predictor of outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

411 patients with IR-PCa were retrospectively reviewed. APP4 was calculated based on biopsy reports. Multivariable competing risk analysis was then performed on optimized APP4 cutpoints to predict for biochemical failure (BF), androgen deprivation use for BF (ADT-BF) and development of metastases (MD).

RESULTS

Median follow-up for the cohort was 5.2 (Inter Quartile Range: 2.9-6.6) years. Median baseline PSA was 7.3 (5.3-9.8) ng/mL. 234 (56.9%) patients had T1 and 177 (43.1%) had T2 disease. Median APP4 was 2.00 (0.75-7.50)%. 38 (9.3%) patients experienced BF. The optimal cutpoint of APP4 for BF was >3.3% with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.66. 17 (4.1%) received ADT-BF. The ADT-BF cutpoint was >6.6% with an AUC of 0.72. Eight (2.0%) developed MD. The MD cutpoint was >17.5% with an AUC of 0.86. Using APP4 >3.3 vs ≤ 3.3, log-transformed baseline PSA ln(PSA) (HR 2.5, 1.1-6.1; p = 0.037) and APP4 (HR 2.3, 1.1-4.7; p = 0.031) predicted for BF. Using APP4 >6.6 vs ≤ 6.6, ln(PSA) (HR 4.2, 1.4-12.4; p = 0.010) and APP4 (HR 3.7, 1.4-10.0; p = 0.009) were predictive of ADT-BF. APP4 >17.5 vs ≤ 17.5 alone was predictive of MD (HR 25.7, 4.9-135.3; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

APP4 cutpoints of >3.3%, >6.6% and >17.5% were strongly associated with increased risk of BF, ADT-BF and developing MD respectively. These findings may inform future practice when treating IR-PCa but require external validation.

Two StereoTactic ablative radiotherapy treatments for localized prostate cancer (2STAR): Results from a prospective clinical trial

PURPOSE

Ultrahypofractionation is appealing for prostate cancer (PCa) due to low α/β, and increasing the dose per fraction could improve the therapeutic index. Here we report the outcomes of a phase II prostate SABR trial using two fractions.

METHODS

Patients had low or intermediate risk prostate cancer. Three gold fiducials were implanted for image guidance. The clinical target volume (CTV) included the prostate only, and the planning target volume (PTV) was a 3 mm expansion enabled through the use of a rectal immobilization device. The dose prescribed was 26 Gy in 2 weekly fractions (EQD2 110 Gy_1.4). The primary endpoint was quality of life using EPIC, and minimal clinically important change (MCIC) was defined as an EPIC QOL decrease >0.5 SD.

RESULTS

30 patients were accrued with a median follow-up of 49.3 months. 10% had low-risk, 33% had favourable intermediate-risk and 57% had unfavourable intermediate-risk PCa. Five patients received a short course of ADT. Median nPSA was 0.2 ng/ml. One patient had BF and is being observed. 56.6% of patients had a 4yPSARR. Six (20.7%) patients had a MCIC in the urinary domain, 6 (21.4%) had a MCIC in the bowel domain, and 3 (20%) had a MCIC in the sexual domain.

CONCLUSIONS

Two-fraction SABR in prostate cancer is safe and feasible, with a minimal change in QOL and a low rate of late grade 3-4 toxicity. The PSA kinetics and biochemical control rates are encouraging given that the majority had unfavourable intermediate-risk disease, although longer follow-up is required.

SABR in high-risk prostate cancer: Outcomes from two prospective clinical trials with and without elective nodal irradiation

3

Background: There is limited data on SABR in high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) especially regarding the role of elective nodal irradiation (ENI). This study compares two prospective phase II trials using SABR in high-risk prostate cancer, with and without ENI. Methods: Both trials enrolled patients with high-risk PCa only. Trial1 (pHART8) patients received 40Gy/5 to the prostate and 30Gy/5 to the seminal vesicles. Trial2 (SATURN) patients received 40Gy/5 to the prostate and 25Gy/5 to the pelvis and seminal vesicles. CTCAE and RTOG toxicities were collected. Biochemical failure (BF) was defined as nadir+2 and 4-year PSA response rate (4yPSARR) was < 0.4 ng/ml. Results: 60 patients were included (pHART8, n=30; SATURN, n=30). Median follow-up was 5.6y and 4.0y. Median nPSA was 0.02ng/ml for both. Six patients had BF, all from pHART8; four were managed with ADT and two are being observed. The BF rate was 14.6% at 5y in pHART8 and 0% in SATURN. All six biochemical failures were associated with a PSA of ≥ 0.4 ng/ml at 4y. 63% of patients in pHART8 and 93% in SATURN had a 4yPSARR. BF probability at 5y was 0% for those achieving a 4yPSARR, and 35.1% if not (p = p < 0.0001). Two patients died in pHART8, one from metastatic disease. One patient in SATURN died from other causes. No other patients developed metastatic disease, and one patient in pHART8 had CRPC. OS at 5y was 93.2% and 96.7% (p=0.86). There was significantly worse late GI and sexual toxicity in pHART8, but no difference in late GU toxicity between the two trials. Conclusions: SABR in high-risk prostate cancer yields biochemical control rates that are comparable to other radiotherapy modalities. ENI using SABR is feasible and led to a significant improvement in biochemical control as well as in 4yPSARR which proved to be a predictor of biochemical control, without an increase in late GI or GU toxicity. Longer follow-up would provide a better assessment of biochemical control. Clinical trial information: NCT01505075 and NCT01953055.

PACE: Analysis of acute toxicity in PACE-B, an international phase III randomized controlled trial comparing stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to conventionally fractionated or moderately hypofractionated external beam radiotherapy (CFMHRT) for localized prostate cancer (LPCa)

1

Background: External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is a curative treatment for LPCa. Large randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have shown moderately hypofractionated regimens (2.5–3 Gy/fraction(f)) as non-inferior to conventionally fractionated regimens (2 Gy/f). PACE-B aims to demonstrate non-inferiority of SBRT compared to CFMHRT for biochemical or clinical failure. Compared to CFMHRT, SBRT reduces patient (pt) attendances but compressed overall treatment time may influence acute toxicity severity. Methods: PACE is a phase III open-label multiple-cohort RCT. Men with LPCa, stage T1-T2, ≤ Gleason 3 + 4, PSA ≤ 20 ng/mL, unsuitable for surgery or preferring EBRT, were eligible for the PACE-B cohort. Between 08/12-01/18, 874 pts (38 centres) were randomised (1:1) to SBRT or CFMHRT. SBRT dose was 36.25 Gy/5f in 1-2 weeks (wks), CFMHRT as 78 Gy/39f over 7.5 wks, or 62 Gy/20f in 4 wks. Androgen deprivation therapy was not permitted. Clinician reported acute toxicity was assessed at baseline, 2-weekly during CFMHRT and at 2, 4, 8 & 12 wks post-treatment. Key toxicity outcomes were worst grade 2+ Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) acute toxicities, compared by Chi-square test with alpha 0.05 divided between the two measures. Results: By per protocol analysis n=430 received CFMHRT, n=414 received SBRT. Key characteristics seen in the CFMHRT and SBRT groups respectively were: mean age: 69.5 vs 69.3 years; T-stage ≥T2b: 51.8% vs 56.6%; Gleason Score 3+4: 80.2% vs 85.0%; PSA 10-20 ng/mL: 30.9% vs 31.6%. RTOG G2+ toxicity was not significantly different for GI events (CMFHRT 52/430 (12.1%) vs SBRT 42/414 (10.1%), p=0.368), nor GU events (CFMHRT 117/430 (27.2%) vs SBRT 96/414 (23.2%), p=0.179). Conclusions: Despite an accelerated treatment schedule, RTOG assessments show similar rates of acute GI and GU toxicity for SBRT and CFHFRT. Pt follow-up in PACE-B continues and results of late toxicity and biochemical/clinical failure are awaited. Clinical trial information: NCT01584258.

Naphthalene degradation by Fe2+/Oxone/UV - Applying an unconventional kinetics model and studying the reaction mechanism

This study shows the degradation of naphthalene (Nap) in aqueous solution using Oxone process mediated by Fe²⁺ with UV-A irradiation (FOU). To elucidate the role of different parameters, Fe²⁺/Oxone (FO), Fe²⁺/UV (FU), Oxone/UV (OU) and direct photolysis processes were studied, separately. The degradation efficiency under different dosage of Fe²⁺, Oxone, initial probe compound concentration and solution pH were evaluated. It is concluded that FOU process has significantly better degradation capacity and efficiency. More than 90% of 0.125 mM Nap was removed in 20 min, under the optimal conditions of FOU ([Fe²⁺]₀ = 0.250 mM, [Oxone]₀ = 0.250 mM, wavelength = 350 nm and pH = 2.8). A mathematical model is proposed to describe the two-stage reaction kinetics involving Oxone. To alleviate the problems of radical surge at the initial stage and a radical deficit at later stage, a stepwise addition of oxidants was conducted and achieved a higher removal performance. Besides, the decay pathways of Nap under FOU process were proposed by using LC-ESI/MS analysis. The TOC content was found to be increased initially and decreased after 2 h reaction. It is clarified that the TOC increment was contributed by the partially degraded intermediates rather than the persistent Nap, since the latter was not completely combustible in the TOC analyzer, demonstrating that the FOU process is effective in degrading Nap into more degradable products such naphthoic acids and aldehydes.

SABR in High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Outcomes From 2 Prospective Clinical Trials With and Without Elective Nodal Irradiation

PURPOSE

There is limited data on stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) in high-risk prostate cancer (PCa), especially regarding the role of elective nodal irradiation (ENI). This study compares 2 prospective phase 2 trials using SABR in high-risk PCa, with and without ENI.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients had high-risk PCa. Those in trial 1 received 40 Gy in 5 fractions to the prostate and 30 Gy in 5 fractions to the seminal vesicles. Patients in trial 2 received 40 Gy in 5 fractions to the prostate and 25 Gy in 5 fractions to the pelvis and seminal vesicles. National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events toxicities were collected. Biochemical failure (BF) was defined as nadir + 2, and the 4-year prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate (4yPSARR) was <0.4 ng/mL.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were included (trial 1, n = 30; trial 2, n = 30). Median follow-up was 5.6 years and 4.0 years. The median nadir PSA was 0.02 ng/mL for both trials. Six patients had BF, all from trial 1. The BF rate was 14.6% at 5 years in trial 1 and 0% in trial 2. Sixty-three percent of patients in trial 1 and 93% in trial 2 had a 4yPSARR. Two patients died in trial 1, 1 from metastatic disease. One patient in trial 2 died of other causes. No other patients developed metastatic disease, and 1 patient in trial 1 had castrate resistant PCa. Overall survival at 5 years was 93.2% and 96.7% (P = .86). There was significantly worse late gastrointestinal and sexual toxicity in trial 1, but there was no difference in late genitourinary toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

SABR in high-risk PCa yields biochemical control rates that may be comparable to that of other radiation therapy modalities. ENI using SABR is feasible and may lead to a significant improvement in biochemical control and in 4yPSARR, without an increase in late gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity. Longer follow-up would provide a better assessment of biochemical control. Well-conducted phase 3 trials are needed to fully establish the role of SABR and ENI in high-risk PCa.