Esophageal perforation following pedicle screw placement for the treatment of upper thoracic spinal tuberculosis: a case report and review of the literature

Background

The technique of posterior pedicle screw fixation has already been widely applied in the treatment of upper thoracic spinal tuberculosis. However, lesions of tuberculosis directly invade the vertebrae and surrounding soft tissues, which increases the risk of esophageal perforation induced by the posterior pedicle screw placement. Herein, we report the first case of esophageal perforation following pedicle screw placement in the upper thoracic spinal tuberculosis, and describe the underlying causes, as well as the treatment and prognosis.

Case presentation

A 48-year-old female patient with upper thoracic spinal tuberculosis presented sputum-like secretions from the wound after she was treated with one-stage operation through the posterolateral approach. Endoscopy was immediately conducted, which confirmed that the patient complicated with postoperative esophageal perforation caused by screws. CT scan showed that the right screw perforated the anterior cortex of the vertebrae and the esophagus at the T4 level. Fortunately, mediastinal infection was not observed. The T4 screw was removed, Vacuum Sealing Drainage (VSD) was performed, and jejunum catheterization was used for enteral nutrition. After continuous treatment with sensitive antibiotics for 2.5 months and 5 times of VSD aspiration, the infected wound recovered gradually. With 18-month follow-up, the esophagus healed well, without symptoms of dysphagia and stomach discomfort, and CT scan showed that T2–4 had complete osseous fusion without sequestrum.

Conclusion

Tuberculosis increases the risk of postoperative esophageal perforation in a certain degree for patients with upper thoracic tuberculosis. The damages to esophagus during the operation should be prevented. The screws with the length no more than 30 mm should be selected. Moreover, close monitoring after operation should be conducted to help the early identification, diagnosis and treatment, which could help preventing the adverse effects induced by the delayed diagnosis and treatment of esophageal perforation.

Pathophysiology of Vomiting and Esophageal Perforation in Boerhaave's Syndrome

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Boerhaave's syndrome, involving esophagus rupture, is considered a pathological response to vomiting that may occur just before perforation. However, the mechanism of vomiting and occurrence of this disease have not been clearly demonstrated.

METHODS

We identified patients with esophageal perforation between 1995 and 2017 and reviewed endoscopic findings at retching during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Finally, we proposed a theory for the underlying pathological mechanism.

RESULTS

We retrospectively investigated 10 patients with esophageal perforation between 1995 and 2017. All patients presented after vomiting associated with large volumes of food and alcohol intake. Nine were treated by primary closure of the perforation and drainage of the thoracic cavity, and one was conservatively treated. In all cases, the perforations were longitudinal tears (1-4 cm) and located in the left of the esophagus, just above the gastric cardia.

CONCLUSIONS

We hypothesize that vomiting occurred by retrograde propagation of gastrointestinal motor contraction from the jejunum to the gastric antrum, followed by prolapse of the gastric fornix mucosal into the esophagus. Subsequent esophageal perforation probably resulted from excessive prolapse due to strong contraction and destruction of the muscularis mucosa of the left side of abdominal esophagus, with longitudinal stretching of the whole left esophageal wall due to traction. We also propose that Boerhaave's syndrome is defined as "post-emetic esophageal perforation" to ensure broader recognition and more expedient diagnosis and treatment. Remaining conditions without any definite causes may be labeled "idiopathic" or "spontaneous" rupture of the esophagus.

Minimally Invasive Approach to Esophageal Perforation after Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration: A Report of 2 Cases

Esophageal perforation after endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for mediastinal staging is a rare but severe complication. We report 2 cases of patients with esophageal perforation who were treated using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in combination with esophageal stenting. Through these cases, the feasibility of minimally invasive thoracic surgery was evaluated.

Aortic penetration due to a fish bone: a case report

Background

Aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) caused by an esophageal foreign body is a life-threatening crisis, with rapid progress and high mortality. The first case of AEF was reported in 1818, but the first successfully managed case was not until 1980. Although there have been some reports on this condition, in most cases, the aorta was invaded and corroded due to its adjacent relationship with the esophagus and subsequent mediastinitis. To date, few reports have described an aortic wall directly penetrated by a sharp foreign body, likely because this type of injury is extremely rare and most patients cannot receive timely treatment. Here, we present a rare case of a fish bone that directly pierced the aorta via the esophagus.

Case presentation

A 31-year-old female experienced poststernum swallowing pain after eating a meal of fish. Gastroscope showed a fishbone-like foreign body had penetrated the esophagus wall. Computed tomography revealed that the foreign body had directly pierced the aorta to form an AEF. Surgery was successfully performed to repair the aorta and esophagus. The postoperation and follow-up was uneventful.

Conclusions

For the treatment of foreign bodies in the esophagus, we should be alert of the possibility of AEFs. The effective management of AEFs requires early diagnosis and intervention, as well as long-term treatment and follow-up, which still has a long way to go.

Self-expanding metal stent in esophageal perforations and anastomotic leaks

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Placement of self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment option for esophageal perforation and leaks. The aim of our study was to assess the role of SEMS for the management of benign esophageal diseases such as perforations and anastomotic leaks.

METHODS

All patients (n = 26) who underwent SEMS placement for esophageal perforation and anastomotic leaks between May 2012 and February 2019 were included. Data were analyzed in relation to the indications, type of stent used, complications, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Indications for stent placement included anastomotic leaks 65% (n = 17) and perforations 35% (n = 9). Fully covered SEMS (FCSEMS) was placed in 25 patients, and in 1, partially covered SEMS (PCSEMS) was placed. Stent placement was successful in all the patients (n = 26). Four patients did not report for follow-up after stenting. Among the patients on follow-up, 91% (20/22) had healing of the mucosal defect. Stent-related complications were seen in 5 (23%) patients and included stent migration [3], reactive hyperplasia [1] and stricture [1].

CONCLUSION

Covered stent placement for a duration of 8 weeks is technically safe and clinically effective as a first-line procedure for bridging and healing benign esophageal perforation and leaks.

Patient-Reported Long-Term Outcome is Superior After Treatment with Self-Expanding Metallic Stents in Esophageal Perforations

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Esophageal perforations are life threatening. Since the 1990s, placing of covered esophageal stents has become an alternative to surgery. Theoretically, this minimally invasive approach has several benefits; however, little data are available on long-term outcome in these patients. We aimed to evaluate how patient-reported outcome differed between full surgery and placement of self-expanding metallic stents when treating primary benign esophageal perforations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Of 48 patients treated at our hospital in 2000-2015, 23 were alive and asked to answer three questionnaires. We used a short clinical questionnaire, the QLQ-OG25 from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and a simplified quality-of-life instrument, the Check Your Health. Non-parametric statistics were used to evaluate differences between the two groups.

RESULTS

In all, 20 (87%) individuals (13 men, 64 years of age) responded. At survey, surgical patients had lost 13 kg of initial weight, compared to no weight loss in the self-expanding metallic stents group (p = 0.01). This involuntary weight loss worried patients according to the QLQ-OG25; otherwise patient-experience measures did not differ between groups. For quality of life, surgical patients scored significantly lower physical health, emotional well-being, social functioning, and overall quality of life after treatment, but after stenting no differences were seen.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to stenting, surgical treatment was associated with involuntary, and worrisome, weight loss as well as reduced quality of life. We therefore believe that self-expanding metallic stents should be used when possible in treating benign esophageal perforations.

Case of Esophageal Perforation and Repair with a Supraclavicular Artery Island Fascial Flap 15 Years After Anterior Spine Surgery

BACKGROUND

Esophageal perforation represents a rare but potentially life-threatening complication of an anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF). Delayed presentations of esophageal perforation more than 10 years following surgery are exceedingly rare and difficult to diagnose. Here, we discuss the case of an 80-year-old man who presented to the emergency department with progressive dysphagia 15 years after his ACDF.

CASE DESCRIPTION

While prior outpatient workup was suggestive of a diverticulum, there was no evidence of esophageal perforation. Progressive symptoms and repeat imaging on admission were suggestive of retropharyngeal phlegmon. Operative esophagoscopy revealed that the spinal hardware had eroded through the posterior wall of the esophagus, creating a traction diverticulum. The hardware was removed, and the esophageal perforation was closed primarily and buttressed with vascularized tissue from a supraclavicular artery island fascial flap.

CONCLUSIONS

This case emphasizes the importance of considering an esophageal perforation in patients who present with dysphagia at any interval following an ACDF, even in the extremely delayed setting. Furthermore, this is the first report, to the best of our knowledge, using a supraclavicular artery island fascial flap to reconstruct an esophageal perforation following an ACDF, and we introduce a novel strategy for managing these complicated injuries.

Safety and efficacy of endoscopic vacuum therapy for the treatment of perforations and anastomotic leaks of the upper gastrointestinal tract

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) in the management of perforations and anastomotic leaks of the upper gastrointestinal tract.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective observational study which included patients who underwent EVT due to any upper gastrointestinal defect between April 2017 and February 2019 in three Spanish Hospitals. To this end, we used the only medical device approved to date for endoscopic use (Eso-SPONGEr; B. Braun Melsungen AG, Melsungen, Germany).

RESULTS

11 patients were referred for EVT of an anastomotic leak after esophagectomy (n=7), gastrectomy (n=2), esophageal perforation secondary to endoscopic Zenker's septomiotomy (n=1) and Boerhaave syndrome (n=1). The median size of the cavity was 8×3cm. The median delay between surgery and EVT was 7 days. The median of EVT duration was 28 days. The median number of sponges used was 7 and the mean period replacement was 3.7 days. In 10 cases (91%), the defect was successfully closed. In 9 cases (82%) clinical resolution of the septic condition was achieved. 5 patients presented some adverse event: 3 anastomotic strictures, 1 retropharyngeal pain and 1 case of new-onset pneumonia. The median hospital stay from the start of EVT was 45 days. 1 patient died owing to septic complications secondary to the anastomotic leak.

CONCLUSION

EVT was successful in over 90% of perforations and anastomotic leaks of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Moreover, this is a safe therapy with only mild adverse events associated.

A national survey on esophageal perforation: study of cases at accredited institutions by the Japanese Esophagus Society

OBJECTIVE

To get a clear view of the current state of treatment for esophageal perforation in Japan. Esophagus perforations are the most serious gastrointestinal tract perforations and are associated with high morbidity and mortality. The optimal treatment choice remains unknown.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective clinical review of 182 esophageal perforation cases at 108 hospitals accredited by the Japanese Esophageal Society between January 2010 and December 2015.

RESULTS

We found that 20.9% of patients were incorrectly diagnosed initially. We observed mediastinum emphysema in 83.5% of patients, and serious abscess formations of the mediastinum and intrathoracic cavity in 38.6% and 29.6%, respectively. The lower esophagus was the most commonly perforated site (77.7%). Management of esophageal perforations included nonoperative treatment in 20 patients (11%) and operative treatment in 162 patients (89%). The overall mortality rate was 6.9%. The survivors had significantly shorter times from symptom appearance to visit (p = 0.0016), and from time to visit to diagnosis confirmation (p = 0.0011). Moreover, patients older than 65 years, white blood cells less than 3000/mm³, C-reactive protein > 10 mg/L, or abscesses in the thoracic cavity showed significantly higher mortality than others.

CONCLUSION

Shortening the time from onset to the start of treatment contributes to reduce mortality in patients with esophageal perforation. Moreover, strict medical treatment is necessary to lower the mortality rate of elderly patients with strong inflammation and abscesses in the thoracic cavity.

Laparoscopic transhiatal suture and gastric valve as a safe and feasible treatment for Boerhaave's syndrome: an Italian single center case series study

Background

Boerhaave’s syndrome (BS) is a rare life-threating condition with poor prognosis. Unfortunately, due to its very low incidence, no clear evidences or definitive guidelines are currently available: in detail, surgical strategy is still a matter of debate. Most of the case series reports thoracic approach as the most widely used; conversely, transhiatal abdominal management is just described in sporadic case reports. In our center, the laparoscopic approach has been adopted for years: in the present study, we aim to show his feasibility by reporting the outcomes of the largest clinical series available to date.

Methods

Clinical records of patients admitted for BS to the General and Upper GI Surgery Division of Verona from February 2014 to December 2019 were retrospectively collected. Clinico-pathological characteristics, preoperative workup, surgical management, and outcomes were analyzed.

Results

Seven patients were admitted; epigastric/thoracic pain and vomiting were the most frequent symptoms at diagnosis. Laboratory findings were not specific; conversely, radiological imaging always revealed abnormal findings: particularly, CT had excellent sensitivity in detecting signs of esophageal perforation. All but one case had diagnostic workup and received surgery within 24 h. Every patient had laparoscopic transhiatal direct suture and gastric valve; 2 patients (28.6%) also needed a thoracoscopic toilette. Postoperative complications occurred in 4 patients (57%), but in only two of them (29%), the complication was severe according to Clavien-Dindo classification (both received thoracentesis or thoracic drainage for pleural effusion). Of note, no cases of postoperative esophageal leak were recorded. Postoperative mortality was 14% due to one patient who died for cardiovascular complications. Most of the patients (71.4%) were admitted to ICU after surgery (average length, 8.8 days); mean hospital stay was 14.7 days. No patients had readmissions.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the largest case series reporting laparoscopic management of BS. We show that laparoscopy is a safe and feasible approach associated with a shorter length of hospital stay when compared with clinical series in which thoracic approach had been chosen. Of note, laparoscopic management would be easily adopted by surgical centers treating benign gastro-esophageal junction entailing a proper management more widely.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE); a disease that must not be neglected - implications of esophageal rupture and its management

Background

The prevalence of Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is increasing, a severe complication of EoE is spontaneous perforation of the oesophagus. It is of great importance to be aware of this risk and handle this severe complication carefully.

Case presentation

A middle-age man with EoE since 2004, had a total esophageal bolus obstruction while eating lunch at the local hospital. Drinking water, in an attempt to release it, led to a total intramural ruptur of the esophageal wall. A CT scan detected the injury and a covered esophageal stent was inserted within 2 h from the injury. Despite the immediate hospital care, he developed mediastinitis, were in need of a laparascopy and intensive care. After 8 weeks the stent was removed and the esophagus was considered healed. Biopsies from the esophagus showed an eosinophilic inflammation (65 eosinophils/HPF). Twelve weeks from the injury he was essentially back in his normal state and was discharged from the hospital. He was placed on a 6 weeks course of topical treatment with budesonide, which needed to be extended due to inadequate remission. Remission was achieved after 12 weeks of treatment.

Conclusion

An effective topical steroid treatment in EoE patients is important. EoE patients are in risk of oesophageal perforation, if so, management may be conservative but mediastinal drainage is important if significant extravasation occurs and should be instituted from the start.

Treatment of esophageal perforation with mediastinal abscess by nasomediastinal drainage placement

Although endoscopic submucosal dissection has been increasingly performed for managing superficial esophageal carcinomas, the risk of post-operative esophageal stenosis remains. Endoscopic balloon dilation for esophageal stenosis is the most common cause of esophageal perforation. Esophageal perforation complicated with mediastinal abscess and sepsis has a high mortality rate. The standard treatment for esophageal perforation is closure. However, the late diagnosis of a case necessitates that treatment of mediastinitis be prioritized over closure of the perforation. We report the case of a 70-year-old man with post-endoscopic submucosal dissection stenosis who underwent endoscopic balloon dilation. Six days after the 16th endoscopic balloon dilation, the patient came to our hospital with a complaint of chest discomfort. Upon assessment, an esophageal perforation and a mediastinal abscess became evident. Because the patient's systemic condition remained stable, instead of performing surgery, we treated the patient conservatively by placing a nasomediastinal drain. After daily rinsing, the mediastinal abscess eventually regressed on the 15th hospital day. The esophageal perforation also closed spontaneously after removing the drainage tube. Nasomediastinal drainage placement appears to be effective in treating an esophageal perforation with a mediastinal abscess.

Esophageal perforation by tilapia fish bone ingestion - A case report

INTRODUCTION

Esophageal perforation (EP) is a rare, severe and challenging surgical emergency which can be caused by several factors. This report presents the case of a patient with EP caused by ingestion of a Tilapia fish bone.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 41-year-old male patient presented with a six-day history of painful right-sided neck swelling, associated with a progressive dysphagia, regurgitation, fever and chills. Physical examination revealed an axillary temperature of 39 °C and a subcutaneous emphysema in the neck. Cervical spine x-ray and ultrasound scan revealed a neck foreign body with abscess. The case was managed by a right cervicotomy.

DISCUSSION

Despite over 20-years of clinical experience in Ghana, this was the first case of EP caused by a 2 cm long Tilapia fish bone, to be treated by the authors. This is significant because tilapia consumption is very popular in Ghana and it would be predicted that such cases would be more common. It is suggested that such cases do occur more frequently but are not reported to hospitals due to cultural-spiritual beliefs.

CONCLUSION

Ingestion of Tilapia fish bones can cause significant damage to the esophagus and Tilapia should be consumed with care. Ultrasound is a very useful tool with high diagnostic accuracy for EP. Further studies are needed to establish the prevalence of EP from fish bone ingestion in Ghana and the factors accounting for the mismatch between the high consumption of Tilapia across the population and the low occurrence of patients presenting with EP from fish bone ingestion.

Bougie-Induced Esophageal Perforation During Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery with Hiatus Hernia Repair

INTRODUCTION

Use of bougie often helps in the calibration of gastric pouch and assess proper closure of the hiatus. Bougie induced esophageal perforation during surgery is uncommon. We encountered a case of bougie induced lower esophageal perforation while introducing it across a gastroesophageal junction.Here we discussed the cause, mechanism of perforation, and its management.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A patient with BMI of 46.7 kg/m 2 was schedule for Laparoscopic Roux- en- Y Gastric Bypass with Hiatus Hernia Repair. A cruroplasty was performed using interrupted non-absorbable suture. Bougie intubation across gastroesophageal junction was unsuccessful after closure of hiatus. Possibilities of incorporation of a esophageal wall during cruroplasty or too tight hiatus was suspected. Crural approximation suture was removed and esophagus was inspected, which showed posterior perforation at the distal esophagus. Primary closure done with fullthickness interrupted 3'0 absorbable suture to create full-thickness interrupted stitches.A Jackson-Pratt drain was placed close to hiatus.

RESULT

We kept the patient nil per orally for two days.On the fourth postoperative day,the patient recovered uneventfully and was discharge after drain removal.

CONCLUSION

Bougie induced perforation is uncommon and occurs after improper manipulation of bougie across the gastroesophageal junction. Acute esophageal angulation and over thrusting of the bougie against closed hiatus can contribute to posterior esophageal perforation. Inspection of the esophagus above the hiatus is essential to avoid missed perforation.

Primary repair of esophageal perforation: Case report

INTRODUCTION

Mortality after esophageal perforation is high irrespective of the treatment modality. The rarity of traumatic esophageal perforations has made it difficult to conduct comprehensive studies that can answer pertinent questions with regard to management.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

We report a case of through and through thoracic esophageal injury caused by an assailant's arrow in a young physically active male adult. Diagnosis was made on-table. He successfully underwent primary repair of the esophageal injury 16 h post injury via a left thoracotomy. Recurrent lung collapse and pleural effusion was managed with tube thoracostomy and chest physiotherapy.

DISCUSSION

Esophageal perforations occur infrequently and may produce vague symptoms leading to diagnostic and therapeutic delays. High index of suspicion particularly in penetrating chest trauma followed by relevant investigations may reduce delay. Principles of management include treatment of contamination, wide local drainage, source control and nutritional support. Source control is achieved surgically or through endoluminal placement of stents. Surgical options include primary repair, creation of a controlled fistula by T-tube or esophageal exclusion.

CONCLUSION

Primary repair of traumatic injury to a healthy esophagus is feasible for cases diagnosed early and without significant mediastinal contamination as in our case. Associated injuries are more likely in such cases to lead to increased morbidity and prolonged hospital stay and must be handled carefully.

The insidious presentation and challenging management of esophageal perforation following diagnostic and therapeutic interventions

Diagnostic and therapeutic interventions on the esophagus or adjacent organs are responsible for nearly half of all esophageal perforations. If not recognized at the time of the injury, iatrogenic esophageal perforations can present insidiously and lead to delay in diagnosis, thereby increasing morbidity and mortality. Acute clinical awareness is vital for prompt diagnosis, which is usually confirmed with contrast esophagography and contrast-enhanced computed tomography. After establishment of diagnosis, treatment should be promptly initiated and include fluid-volume resuscitation, cessation of oral intake, nasogastric tube insertion, broad-spectrum antibiotics and analgesia. Primary repair, when feasible, is the treatment of choice. Additional procedures beyond primary repair, such as relief of concomitant obstruction, may be necessary if there is underlying esophageal pathology. Drainage alone can be performed for perforations of the cervical esophagus that cannot be visualized. Esophageal T-tube placement or exclusion and diversion techniques are appropriate in clinically unstable patients and in cases where primary repair is precluded either due to preexisting esophageal disease or extensive esophageal damage. Esophagectomy should be performed in patients with malignancy, end-stage benign esophageal disease or extensive esophageal damage that precludes repair. Endoscopic techniques, including stenting, clipping or vacuum therapy, can be used in select cases. Finally, nonoperative management should be reserved for patients with contained esophageal perforations, limited extraluminal soilage and no evidence of systemic inflammation.

Pharyngo-Esophageal Perforations After Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: Management and Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To report about the diagnosis, surgical treatment, and postoperative management of pharyngo-esophageal perforations (PEPs) after anterior cervical spine (ACS) surgery in 17 patients.

METHODS

A retrospective multicenter case series of patients surgically treated for PEP after ACS surgery was performed. Data regarding cervical spine pathology and surgery, comorbidities, diagnosis and surgical management of PEP, airway management, antibiotic therapy, postoperative course, and feeding route after repair surgery at discharge and last follow-up were collected.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients were included in the study, for a total of 22 surgical procedures for PEP repair. Seven PEPs (41%) had early onset, whereas 10 (59%) were delayed. All patients underwent PEP surgical repair through an anterior prevascular retrovisceral cervicotomic approach, consisting of multiple layer sutures of the perforation, with flap interposition. Despite the challenging management of these patients, 16 of 17 patients from our series restored oral feeding.

CONCLUSIONS

PEPs are among the most appalling complications of cervical spine surgery. Because of their rarity and heterogeneous presentation, a standardized management is difficult to define. From our experience with the largest case series in the literature, a multidisciplinary approach is advisable to deal with these patients.

The decrease of BMI and albumin levels influences the rate of anastomotic leaks in patients following reconstruction after emergency diverting esophagectomy

OBJECTIVES

Diverting esophagectomies in cases of benign esophageal perforations remain rare but potentially life saving procedures. Usually, an esophagostoma and a feeding jejunostomy or gastrostomy are created, and patients are given time to recover from the emergency situation. However, little is known about morbidity and mortality as well as the optimal timing for a staged reconstruction.

METHODS

Patients with benign esophageal perforations were selected from our retrospective database. Perforations in esophageal malignancies were excluded to avoid bias on patients' general outcome. Clinical parameters and especially, the influence of the nutritional status indicated by the BMI (Body Mass Index) as well as serum albumin levels (g/l) were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 24 patients with diverting esophagectomies were identified. Of these, 13 (54.2%) patients received a staged reconstruction after a median of 143.0 days. Patients presenting for their staged reconstruction demonstrated a significantly decreased level of their BMI (p = 0.026) as compared to their prior hospitalization. Interestingly, the relative decrease of BMI (8.5 kg/m² vs. 4.3 kg/m²) and albumin levels (6.5 g/l vs. 0.0 g/l) was significantly different in patients with or without anastomotic leaks between both surgeries (p = 0.021; p = 0.034, respectively). In addition, higher rates of overall complications were associated with an increased rate of malnutrition.

CONCLUSIONS

The relative amount of malnutrition indicated by BMI or serum albumin levels influences the rate of anastomotic leaks and general complications in patients with staged reconstruction after diverting esophagectomy for non-malignant esophageal perforations. Hence, reconstruction should be done as fast as possible to reduce the amount of malnutrition and a frequent assessment of the nutritional status must be done during recovery from the emergency surgery.

Meglumine diatrizoate esophagogram after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM): identification of imaging findings associated with clinical complications and longer hospital stay

OBJECTIVES

Esophageal peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is the treatment of reference of major obstructive esophageal motility disorders but the detection of early complications remains challenging. Our aim was to report the radiological findings on meglumine diatrizoate esophagograms after esophageal POEM and identify variables associated with patient outcomes.

METHODS

The imaging and clinical files of 106 patients who underwent POEM for achalasia or other major obstructive esophageal motility disorders were retrospectively analyzed. Post POEM esophagograms were reviewed for the presence of pneumoperitoneum, pleural effusion, extraesophageal contrast leakage, and dislocated clips. Associations between length of hospital stay and radiological findings were searched for using a Cox multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 106 patients (M/F = 56/50; mean age = 50 ± 2 [SD] years) underwent 106 POEM procedures with a meglumine diatrizoate esophagogram on postoperative day 1. Overall median hospital stay was 3 days (range 1-20 days). Pneumoperitoneum, pleural effusion, extraesophageal contrast leakage, and dislocated clips were observed in 90/106 (84.9%), 12/106 (11.3%), 4/106 (3.8%), and 0/106 (0%) patients, respectively. At multivariate analysis, pleural effusion (p = 0.005; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.35 [95% CI 0.17-0.73]) and extraesophageal contrast leakage (p = 0.039; aHR = 0.27 [95% CI 0.08-0.94]) were associated with a prolonged hospital stay. Pneumoperitoneum was not associated with unfavorable outcome (p = 0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Pneumoperitoneum is a common finding after POEM and is not indicative of unfavorable patient outcome. Conversely, post POEM pleural effusion and extraesophageal contrast leakage are associated with a longer hospital stay.

KEY POINTS

• Water-soluble esophagogram is a valid diagnostic modality to diagnose early complications after esophageal endoscopic myotomy for esophageal motility disorders. • At multivariate analysis, pleural effusion and extraesophageal contrast leakage are associated with a prolonged hospital stay after peroral endoscopic myotomy. • Pneumoperitoneum is not associated with unfavorable outcome after peroral endoscopic myotomy.

Trans-hiatal repair for Oesophageal and Junctional perforation: a case series

Background

Oesophageal perforation is a life-threatening condition that requires urgent intervention. Surgical repair is recommended within 24 h of onset to minimise mortality risk, traditionally via an open thoracotomy or a laparotomy. Primary oesophageal repair via a laparoscopic trans-hiatal approach has been seldomly reported due to concerns of inadequate eradication of soilage in the mediastinum and pleural space, as well as poor access and an increased operative time in an unwell population.

Case presentation

We report a case series of 3 oesophageal and junctional perforations with varying presentations, demonstrating how the laparoscopic trans-hiatal approach can be used successfully to manage oesophageal perforations.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic trans-hiatal repair is an attractive option for oesophageal and junctional perforations, in haemodynamically stable surgical candidates, in the absence of gross contamination of the thoracic cavity.

Esophageal perforation in eosinophilic esophagitis: A systematic review on clinical presentation, management and outcomes

There is evidence of an increased fragility in the inflamed esophagus of patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). We performed a systematic review on presentation, management and outcomes of and surgical interventions for esophageal perforation in these patients, by searching in the MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus databases. Of the 599 references identified, 41 full-papers and 9 abstract met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 76 esophageal perforation episodes in 70 individual patients aged between 9 and 65 years were reported. 51 patients had not been diagnosed with EoE at the time of perforation; 14 patients had an untreated disease and the remaining were non responsive to therapy. Acute or progressive pain after long-lasting dysphagia and food impaction was the most common symptom leading to diagnosis in 42 patients who presented with Boerhaave syndrome. Pushing impacted food into the stomach led to perforation in 5 cases. Eight episodes appeared after dilation. CT scans demonstrated perforation in 82.4% of patients. Conservative management (including esophageal stenting) was used in 67.1% patients. The 25 remaining patients underwent surgery. Recovery was uneventful in the vast majority of patients. No death was reported. Active inflammation due to undiagnosed or untreated EoE was present in most cases of esophageal perforation. Conservative treatment of perforation should always be considered in EoE.

An interventional radiology technique to treat pharyngeal or esophageal perforation associated with mediastinal abscess in children

PURPOSE

Pharyngeal or esophageal perforation with mediastinal abscess is notably dangerous in children and can be very difficult to treat. We aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of the transnasal placement of a mediastinal drainage catheter and a nasojejunal feeding tube, with or without gastric decompression, in the treatment of the above perforations in children.

METHODS

We placed transnasal mediastinal drainage catheters and nasojejunal feeding tubes in 14 pediatric patients. Patients with esophageal perforation also underwent the placement of a gastric decompression tube. Four of these patients additionally received chest drainage tubes.

RESULTS

The fistula healed after a median of 66 days (range, 5-404 days). Corrosive esophagitis occurred in two patients with pharyngeal perforations. One of these patients underwent surgical treatment 2 months after fistula healing, and the other underwent repeated balloon dilatation procedures for cicatricial restenosis. Four months after the fistula had healed, the patients with esophageal perforations were all free from recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The use of interventional radiology to place a transnasal mediastinal drainage catheter, a nasojejunal feeding tube, and a gastric decompression tube is a safe, easy, inexpensive, and efficacious way to treat pharyngeal or esophageal perforation complicated by mediastinal abscess in children.

TYPE OF STUDY

Treatment study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Nasogastric tube in anterior cervical spine surgery, is it necessary?

Background:

The aim of this article was to verify the utility of nasogastric (NG) tube in primary anterior cervical surgeries. Palpating and identifying the NG tube introduced during induction is one of the ways of preventing esophageal injuries during surgery. It may also be used as a conduit for postoperative feeding. However, the use of NG tube is not without complications. Esophageal perforation is one of them, with an incidence of 0.3%.

Materials and Methods:

A retrospective observational study was performed of patients who underwent a primary anterior cervical spine surgery from January 2007 to July 2017 by a single surgeon. The indications were degenerative, trauma, infection, and neoplasia. NG tube was avoided in all cases. The patients were followed for 6 months.

Results:

Our study included 356 patients (201 males and 155 females), with a mean age of 43.6 years (18–92 years) and a mean follow-up of 6 months. We had only one case of esophageal perforation (0.28%) attributed to a traumatic burst fracture.

Conclusions:

This study indicates that the use of a NG tube in primary anterior cervical spine surgery can be avoided. Comprehensive knowledge of anatomy and meticulous dissection may avoid the disastrous complication of esophageal rupture. This way the discomfort and complications associated with NG tube can be avoided.

Cervical esophageal perforation caused by the use of bougie during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Obesity is considered a chronic disease with an increasing prevalence worldwide during the last decades. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is the most commonly performed bariatric procedure, due to its relative safety and long-term efficacy. The use of bougie to ensure correct size of the gastric tube is part of the standard operation, usually placed by the anesthesiologist and with a very low rate of complications. We report the first case, to our knowledge, of a cervical esophageal perforation caused by the use of bougie during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

CASE PRESENTATION

The complication occurred in a previously healthy 42-year old female patient who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for class 1 obesity (BMI 31 kg/m²) and was diagnosed the first post-operative day. She was subsequently treated with an emergency thoracoscopy and evacuation of a mediastinal fluid collection, with additional neck incision for primary closure of the esophageal defect which was reinforced with a sternocleidomastoid muscle flap. The post-operative course was uneventful.

CONCLUSIONS

We made a literature review to better understand the options considering the diagnosis and treatment in case of very proximal iatrogenic esophageal perforations. The risks related to the use of bougie during surgery should not be underestimated, and its insertion must be done with extreme caution. Esophageal perforation is still a challenging, life threatening complication where prompt diagnosis and adequate treatment are essential.