Cumulative effect of complete left bundle-branch block and chronic atrial fibrillation on 1-year mortality and hospitalization in patients with congestive heart failure. A report from the Italian network on congestive heart failure (in-CHF database)

BACKGROUND

Many clinical variables have been proposed as prognostic factors in patients with congestive heart failure. Among these, complete left bundle-branch block and atrial fibrillation are known to impair significantly left ventricular performance in patients with congestive heart failure. However, their combined effect on mortality has been poorly investigated. The aim of this study was to determine whether left bundle-branch block associated with atrial fibrillation had an independent, cumulative effect on mortality for congestive heart failure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analysed the Italian Network on congestive heart failure (IN-CHF) Registry that was established by the Italian Association of Hospital Cardiologists in 1995. One-year follow-up data were available for 5517 patients. Complete left bundle-branch block and atrial fibrillation were associated in 185 (3.3%) patients. In this population the cause of congestive heart failure was dilated cardiomyopathy (38.4%), ischaemic heart disease (35.1%), hypertensive heart disease (17.3%), and other aetiologies (9.2%). This combination of electrical defects was associated with an increased 1-year mortality from any cause (hazard ratio, HR: 1.88; 95% CI 1.37-2.57) and sudden death (HR: 1.89; 95% CI 1.17-3.03) and 1-year hospitalization rate (HR: 1.83; 95% CI 1.26-2.67).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with congestive heart failure, the contemporary presence of left bundle-branch block and atrial fibrillation was associated with a significant increase in mortality. This synergistic effect remained significant after adjusting for clinical variables usually associated with advanced heart failure. We can conclude that this combination of electrical disturbances identifies a congestive heart failure specific population with a high risk of mortality.

QRS duration and mortality in patients with congestive heart failure

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

It has been suggested that prolongation of the QRS duration (>120 ms) is an independent risk factor for mortality in patients with cardiomyopathy. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between QRS duration and survival in patients with heart failure.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis to examine the association between QRS prolongation (> or =120 ms) and mortality. The study population included 669 patients with heart failure. Two groups, on the basis of baseline QRS duration <120 milliseconds or > or =120 milliseconds, were identified. The groups were compared with respect to total mortality and sudden death. Subgroups were also stratified by right bundle branch block and left bundle branch block, ejection fraction (EF) <30% and > or =30% to 40%, ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy, amiodarone and placebo.

RESULTS

Prolonged QRS was associated with a significant increase in mortality (49.3% vs 34.0%, P =.0001) and sudden death (24.8% vs 17.4%, P =.0004). Left bundle branch block was associated with worse survival (P =.006) but not sudden death. In patients with an EF <30%, QRS prolongation continued to be associated with a significant increase in mortality (51.6% vs 41.1%, P =.01) and sudden death (28.8% vs 21.1%, P =.02). In those with an EF of 30% to 40%, QRS prolongation was associated with a significant increase in mortality (42.7% vs 23.3%, P =.0036) but not in sudden death (13.3% vs 12.0%, P =.625). After adjustment for baseline variables, independent predictors of mortality were found to be prolongation of QRS (P =.0028, risk ratio 1.46) and depressed EF (P =.0001, risk ratio 0.965). Age, type of cardiomyopathy, and drug treatment group were not predictive of mortality.

CONCLUSION

QRS prolongation is an independent predictor of both increased total mortality and sudden death in patients with heart failure.

Linkage analyses and SCN5A mutations screening in five sudden unexplained death syndrome (Lai-tai) families

Sudden Unexplained Death Syndrome (SUDS) (or in Thai Lai-tai) share the same ECG pattern as Brugada Syndrome: RSR' and ST segment elevation in V1 to V3. Brugada Syndrome is a genetic disorder with the inheritance pattern of autosomal dominant (using the ECG pattern and unexplained sudden death as phenotype) and the cardiac sodium channel gene (SCN5A) mutations caused this syndrome. To determine whether SUDS was associated with the same mutations as Brugada Syndrome, the authors performed a linkage studies on 5 SUDS families with the Brugada Syndrome ECG pattern and found one family could not be excluded from linkage to SCN5A. However, the direct sequencing in 8 reported mutations on exon 5, 12, 17, 18 and 28 in this family failed to demonstrate the mutations. It was concluded that SUDS mutations maybe a novel mutation different from previously reported mutations, further genetic studies in SCN5A and other candidate genes might elucidate the molecular basis of SUDS.

Left bundle-branch block is associated with increased 1-year sudden and total mortality rate in 5517 outpatients with congestive heart failure: a report from the Italian network on congestive heart failure

BACKGROUND

A deleterious effect of complete left bundle-branch block (LBBB) on left ventricular function has been established. Nevertheless, the independent effect of a widened QRS on mortality rate in congestive heart failure (CHF) is still controversial. Therefore, we carried out this analysis to determine whether LBBB is an independent predictor of mortality in CHF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analyzed the large Italian Network on CHF Registry of unselected outpatients with CHF of different causes. The registry was established by the Italian Association of Hospital Cardiologists in 1995. Complete 1-year follow-up data were available for 5517 patients. The main underlying cardiac diagnosis was ischemic heart disease in 2512 patients (45.6%), dilated cardiomyopathy in 1988 patients (36.0%), and hypertensive heart disease in 714 patients (12.9%). Other causes were recorded in the remaining 303 cases (5.5%). LBBB was present in 1391 patients (25.2%) and was associated with an increased 1-year mortality rate from any cause (hazard ratio, 1.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.41 to 2.05) and sudden death (hazard ratio, 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.21 to 2.06). Multivariate analysis showed that such an increased risk was still significant after adjusting for age, underlying cardiac disease, indicators of CHF severity, and prescription of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-blockers.

CONCLUSION

LBBB is an unfavorable prognostic marker in patients with CHF. The negative effect is independent of age, CHF severity, and drug prescriptions. These data may support the rationale of randomized trials to verify the effects on mortality rate of ventricular resynchronization with multisite cardiac pacing in patients with CHF and LBBB.

Effects of thrombolysis in the evolution of right bundle-branch block complicating an acute anterior myocardial infarction

INTRODUCTION

There is scant information about the effects of thrombolysis in the evolution of right bundle-branch block (RBBB) in the setting of acute anterior myocardial infarction. The aim of this study has been to analyse these effects and its impact on prognosis.

METHODS

We studied 54 patients who presented a RBBB related to an acute anterior myocardial infarction. We defined two groups: those who received thrombolytic treatment and those who did not. We analysed the evolution of RBBB (transience, moment of onset, moment of disappearance) and its relationship with in-hospital mortality.Twenty-one patients (39%) received thrombolytic treatment (groupT) and 33 patients (61%) (group NT) did not.

RESULTS

The incidence of late appearance (> 6 h) of RBBB was less frequent in group T compared with group NT (10% vs. 33%, p = 0.04). The incidence of transient block was similar in the two groups (57% vs. 45%, p ns). However, early disappearance of RBBB (in < 6 hours) was more common in group T than in group NT (33% vs. 9%, p = 0.04). Mortality was higher in patients with RBBB present at 24 h after admission) than in those with RBBB resolved in less than 24 hours (in group NT, 55% vs. 8%, p = 0.02 and in group T 50% vs. 0%, p = 0.02, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Thrombolysis seems to influence the moment of onset and disappearance of RBBB by promoting its early disappearance and avoiding its late appearance. Disappearance of RBBB is associated with a better prognosis.

Bundle branch block as a predictor of long-term survival after acute myocardial infarction

Using a community-based population of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), we sought to: (1) determine the prevalence of bundle branch block (BBB) on the presenting electrocardiogram (ECG), (2) compare the clinical characteristics and the treatment administered to patients with and without BBB, and (3) determine the association of BBB with mortality. We analyzed the admission ECGs of 894 consecutive patients with AMI from Olmsted County, Minnesota, seen at our institution from January 1988 to March 1998. Of these, 53 had left BBB (LBBB) (5.9%) and 60 had right BBB (RBBB) (6.7%). Patients with BBB were more likely to be older, have a history of AMI or hypertension, and to be in Killip class >I at presentation. They were less likely to receive primary reperfusion therapy, beta blockers, or heparin, but more likely to receive angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. They had lower mean predischarge ejection fractions (38 +/- 16% vs 50 +/- 15%, p <0.0001). In-hospital mortality was 13.3%, 17.0%, and 9.1% for patients with RBBB, LBBB, and no BBB, respectively (p = 0.11). Respective postdischarge survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 80%, 60%, and 50% in the RBBB group, 78%, 56%, and 51% in the LBBB group, and 92%, 85%, and 76% in the group without BBB (p <0.0001). Although BBB was not an independent predictor of mortality on multivariate analysis, the presence of transient or persistent BBB with AMI is an easily recognized clinical marker of increased mortality. Our conclusion from this study is that in a community-based population, patients who had LBBB or RBBB at the time of AMI had lower predischarge ejection fractions and higher in-hospital and long-term unadjusted mortality.

Value of non-invasive and invasive studies in patients with bundle branch block, syncope and history of myocardial infarction

The prognosis of patients with bundle branch block (BBB) and myocardial infarction (MI) is poor, particularly for patients suffering from syncope. The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of some techniques for the evaluation of the mechanism of syncope in patients with MI and BBB and their prognosis.

METHODS

We prospectively obtained the results of clinical history, 24 h Holter monitoring, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), signal-averaged ECG (SAECG) and programmed ventricular stimulation in 130 patients with syncope, MI and BBB. 81 of them had right (R)BBB and 49-left (L)BBB.

RESULTS

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) was identified as the main cause of syncope in patients with MI and BBB: 68% of them had inducible VT. The sensitivity (se) and specificity (sp) of non sustained VT on Holter monitoring for the detection of VT were respectively 42.5 and 47% in patients with RBBB, 62 and 36% in those with LBBB; se and sp of LVEF <40% were 67.5% and 65% in patients with RBBB, 85 and 9% in those with LBBB; se and sp of the combination of 2 of the 3 SAECG criteria, QRS duration > 155 ms, LAS duration >30 ms and RMS 40 < 17 microV were respectively 50 and 57% in patients with RBBB; se and sp of the combination of 2 of the 3 criteria QRS duration >165 ms, LAS duration >40 ms and RMS 40 <17 microV were 73 and 55.5%) in patients with LBBB. During the follow-up (4.7 years +/- 2.5), 12 patients died suddenly and 12 patients died from heart failure. Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed than only the induction of VT was a significant predictor of sudden death. A long QRS duration (> 165 ms) and induction of VT were independent predictors of total cardiac mortality.

CONCLUSION

Among noninvasive studies, only the determination of filtered QRS duration was a significant predictor of cardiac mortality in the case of a prolongation (> 165 ms). Sudden death was only predicted by the induction of sustained VT. Because of the high incidence of inducible sustained VT, the low value of Holter monitoring and decreased LVEF for the prediction of ventricular arrhythmias and the poor prognosis of patients with inducible VT and low LVEF, systematic programmed ventricular stimulation is indicated in patients with MI, syncope and BBB, whatever the non-invasive studies results.

Bundle branch and atrioventricular block as complications of acute myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the incidence of intraventricular and atrioventricular conduction defects associated with acute myocardial infarction and the degree of in hospital mortality resulting from this condition during the era of thrombolytic therapy.

METHODS

Observational study of a cohort of 929 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction. Multivariate analysis by logistic regression. Was used.

RESULTS

Logistic regression showed a greater incidence of bundle branch block in male sex (odds ratio = 1.87, 95% CI = 1.02-3.42), age over 70 years (odds ratio = 2.31, 95% CI = 1.68-5.00), anterior localization of the infarction (odds ratio = 1.93, 95% CI = 1.03-3.65). There was a greater incidence of complete atrioventricular block in inferior infarcts (odds ratio = 2.59, 95% CI 1.30-5.18) and the presence of cardiogenic shock (odds ratio = 3.90, 95% CI = 1.43-10.65). Use of a thrombolytic agent was associated with a tendency toward a lower occurrence of bundle branch block (odds ratio = 0.68) and a greater occurrence of complete atrioventricular block (odds ratio = 1.44). The presence of bundle branch block (odds ratio = 2.45 95%, CI = 1.14-5.28) and of complete atrioventricular block (odds ratio = 13.59, 95% CI = 5.43-33.98) was associated with a high and independent probability of inhospital death.

CONCLUSION

During the current era of thrombolytic therapy and in this population, intraventricular disturbances of electrical conduction and complete atrioventricular block were associated with a high and independent risk of inhospital death during acute myocardial infarction.

Prognostic value of pharmacologic stress echocardiography in patients with left bundle branch block

PURPOSE

Although coronary artery disease is a frequent cause of left bundle branch block, the prognostic value of myocardial ischemia in patients with this conduction abnormality has not been defined. We investigated the value of pharmacologic stress echocardiography in risk stratification of patients with left bundle branch block.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three hundred eighty-seven patients [230 men and 157 women, mean (+/- SD) age, 64 +/- 9 years] with complete left bundle branch block on the resting electrocardiogram underwent dobutamine (n = 217) or dipyridamole (n = 170) stress echocardiography to evaluate suspected or known coronary artery disease. A summary wall motion score (on a one to four scale) was calculated. The primary end points were cardiac death and nonfatal myocardial infarction.

RESULTS

A positive echocardiographic result (evidence of ischemia) was detected in 109 (28%) patients. During a mean follow-up of 29 +/- 26 months, there were 21 cardiac deaths and 20 myocardial infarctions, 63 patients underwent coronary revascularization, and 1 patient received a heart transplant. In a multivariate analysis, four clinical and echocardiographic variables were associated with increased risk of cardiac death: resting wall motion score index [hazard ratio (HR) = 7.5 per unit; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.8 to 20; P = 0.001], previous myocardial infarction (HR = 2.9; 95% CI, 1.1 to 7.3; P = 0.02), diabetes (HR = 2.7; 95% CI, 1.1 to 6.6; P = 0.03), and the change in wall motion score index from rest to peak stress (HR = 3.0 per unit; 95% CI, 1.0 to 8.6; P = 0.04). The 5-year survival was 77% in the ischemic group and 92% in the nonischemic group (P = 0.02). Four variables were associated with increased risk of cardiac death or infarction: previous myocardial infarction (HR = 3.4; 95% CI, 1.7 to 6.8; P = 0.0005), diabetes (HR = 2.4; 95% CI, 1.2 to 4.6; P = 0.01), resting wall motion score index (HR = 2.2 per unit; 95% CI, 1.1 to 4.1; P = 0.02), and positive echocardiographic result (HR = 2.2; 95% CI, 1.1 to 4.5; P = 0.03). The 5-year infarction-free survival was 60% in the ischemic group and 87% in the nonischemic group (P < 0.0001). Stress echocardiography significantly improved risk stratification in patients without previous myocardial infarction (P = 0.0001), but not in those with previous myocardial infarction (P = 0.08). In particular, it provided additional value over clinical and resting echocardiographic findings in predicting cardiac events among patients without previous infarction.

CONCLUSIONS

Myocardial ischemia during pharmacologic stress echocardiography is a strong prognostic predictor in patients with left bundle branch block, particularly in those without previous myocardial infarction.

Complete bundle branch block as an independent predictor of all-cause mortality: report of 7,073 patients referred for nuclear exercise testing

PURPOSE

Complete left bundle branch block is a well-established independent risk factor for mortality, but the prognostic importance of right bundle branch block is unclear. We determined whether left and right bundle branch block was associated with all-cause mortality risk after adjustment for potential confounders, including clinical, exercise, and nuclear scintigraphic variables.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

We studied 7,073 adults who were referred for symptom-limited nuclear exercise testing. Patients with heart failure or pacemakers were excluded. The presence or absence of bundle branch block was determined from resting electrocardiograms. The main outcome measure was all-cause mortality during a mean of 6.7 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety patients (3%) had complete right bundle branch block, and 150 (2%) had complete left bundle branch block. There were 825 deaths (12%). Mortality was greater in patients with complete right bundle branch block (24% [46 of 190]) or left bundle branch block (24% [36 of 150]) than in those without these findings (11% [779 of 6,883 and 789 of 6,923, respectively]; both P <0.0001). After adjustment for potential confounders, right bundle branch block was as strong an independent predictor of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1 to 2.1; P = 0.007) as left bundle branch block (HR 1.5; 95% CI: 1.0 to 2.0; P = 0.017). Incomplete right bundle branch block was not associated with mortality.

CONCLUSION

Complete right and left bundle branch block are independent predictors of all-cause mortality risk even after adjustment for exercise capacity, nuclear perfusion defects, and other risk factors.

Adverse events with transvenous left ventricular pacing in patients with severe heart failure: early experience from a single centre

AIMS

Assessment of complications following implantation of transvenous ventricular electrodes to pace the left ventricle.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients with severe cardiac failure and left bundle branch block were prospectively followed for adverse effects of implantation of a left ventricular transvenous pacing system. Immediate follow-up was associated with loss of left ventricular pacing in nine patients (32%). This was due to lead dislodgement in four cases (corrected by re-operation in three of these cases), and due to increased threshold in five cases (corrected by programming a higher pacing amplitude in all five cases, but with intermittent diaphragmatic contraction in one case). After 1 month, one patient died, one patient with severe coronary heart disease suffered a myocardial infarction, and left ventricular pacing was lost in two patients. Pericardial effusion, new significant ventricular arrhythmias or other adverse effects were not observed. After a mean follow-up of 16 +/- 9.2 months, pacing leads remained stable and no late complications related to the transvenous left ventricular epicardial pacing were observed.

CONCLUSION

Placement of a permanent lead in a tributary of the coronary sinus is feasible without serious adverse effects during the first month. The only frequent adverse event was lead dislodgement; a finding which emphasizes the need for development of specially designed leads for this application.

Bundle branch block and acute myocardial infarction. Treatment and outcome

OBJECTIVE

To study early diagnosis, treatment and outcome in patients with bundle branch block and clinically suspected acute myocardial infarction.

DESIGN

A prospective multicenter study including 14 Swedish coronary care units. The study included 257 consecutive patients with bundle branch block and clinical suspicion of acute myocardial infarction.

RESULTS

Left bundle branch block was present in 62% of patients and right bundle branch block in 38%. Thrombolytic treatment of acute myocardial infarction in the left and right bundle branch block was 16% and 36%, respectively. Of those undergoing thrombolytic therapy, 20% of patients with left and 13% with right bundle branch block did not develop an acute myocardial infarction. Patients with left bundle branch block had higher mortality rates than those with right bundle branch block. After one year there was no difference in mortality rates between patients with and those without acute myocardial infarction on admission.

CONCLUSION

Patients with bundle branch block and suspected acute myocardial infarction receive suboptimal treatment. Thus better diagnostic regimes are needed to identify those patients with bundle branch block and acute myocardial infarction who are suitable for thrombolytic treatment.

The Brugada syndrome

The Brugada syndrome is a hereditary disease causing sudden cardiac death in apparently healthy individuals with a structurally normal heart. The disease is caused by mutations in the cardiac sodium channel gene SCN5A. Patients with this disease have a peculiar electrocardiogram with elevation of the ST segment in leads V1 to V3, an electrocardiogram that every doctor should recognize. There exist variants of the electrocardiogram with minimal ST segment elevation and even concealed forms that can only be unmasked by the administration of class I antiarrhythmic drugs. When left untreated or when treated with all known antiarrhythmic drugs, patients with Brugada syndrome have a high mortality (approximately 10% per year). The only effective treatment to prevent sudden death is the implantable defibrillator.

Treatment and outcomes of left bundle-branch block patients with myocardial infarction who present without chest pain. National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 Investigators

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine the importance of chest pain on presentation as a predictor of in-hospital treatment and mortality in myocardial infarction (MI) patients with left bundle-branch block (LBBB).

BACKGROUND

Left bundle-branch block patients have a high mortality after MI but are unlikely to receive reperfusion therapy despite evidence from clinical trials demonstrating the efficacy of thrombolytic therapy. Nearly half of MI patients with LBBB present without chest pain.

METHODS

We studied the clinical features, treatment and in-hospital survival of 29,585 patients with LBBB enrolled in the National Registry of MI 2 June 1994 through March 1998). Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the independent effect of chest pain on reperfusion decisions and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Left bundle-branch block patients with chest pain were greater than five-fold more likely to receive reperfusion therapy (13.6% vs. 2.6%) than LBBB patients without chest pain; they were also more likely to receive aspirin, beta-adrenergic blocking agents, heparin and nitrates (all p < 0.0001). Unadjusted in-hospital mortality was 18% in patients with chest pain and 27% in patients without chest pain. Adjusting for patient characteristics reduced the odds ratio associated with the absence of chest pain from 1.47 (95% confidence interval: 1.41 to 1.54) to 1.21 (95% confidence interval: 1.12 to 1.30). The remainder of the mortality difference was caused by the undertreatment of patients without chest pain, particularly the low utilization of aspirin and beta-blockers.

CONCLUSIONS

Left bundle-branch block patients with MI who present without chest pain are less likely to receive optimal therapy and are at increased risk of death. Prompt recognition and treatment of this high-risk subgroup should improve survival.

Is the prognosis poorer in heart transplanted patients who develop a right bundle branch block?

BACKGROUND

Currently studies conflict on the impact on mortality of right bundle branch block development after transplantation. Most studies conclude that right bundle branch block does not affect patient survival. However, no distinction is made between patients in whom right bundle branch block progresses and those in whom it remains unchanged during follow-up. The objective of this study is to assess clinical or survival differences between patients who develop right bundle branch block and those who do not, and also to analyze these differences depending on progression of this conduction abnormality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety-seven consecutive heart transplant recipients with more than 1 year's survival were analyzed. Twelve-lead standard ECGs were performed during the first week after transplantation, which allowed for classification of patients depending on the presence or absence of right bundle branch block. Subsequently, throughout the first year, 2 groups were identified, depending on increase of the conduction defect. The groups were compared and factors determining the presence of right bundle branch block and progression of the conduction defect were found. Survival curves for the conduction defect were also compared.

RESULTS

Fifty percent of the patients developed right bundle branch block after transplantation; it was progressive in 10. Progressive right bundle branch block was related to greater renal dysfunction (odds ration [OR] = 10.8; confidence interval [CI] = 2-58; p = 0.006), a larger number of rejections (p = 0.01), and a greater death rate (OR = 12.8; CI = 2.5-64; p = 0.002). The presence of progressive right bundle branch block was an independent predictor of long-term mortality (OR = 27.9; CI = 4.2-186.3; p = 0.0006).

CONCLUSIONS

The development of right bundle branch block after transplantation is related to intraoperative factors and to a greater number of rejections. The presence of this conduction disorder, particularly if it progresses during the first year, identifies a sub-group of patients with a poorer long-term prognosis.

What is the Brugada syndrome?

In 1992, Brugada and Brugada reported a distinct subgroup of patients with episodes of "idiopathic"polymorphic ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation characterized by a unique electrocardiographic (ECG) pattern, which consisted of right bundle branch block and ST-segment elevation from V1 to V2-V3. As in patients with long QT syndrome, the ECG changes and the ventricular electrical instability could not be explained by structural heart disease, myocardial ischemia, or electrolyte disturbances. The syndrome can be inherited and predominantly affects males. Clinical presentation includes cardiac arrest or syncope caused by rapid ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation characteristically occurring at rest or during sleep. The clinical outcome of affected patients is poor unless they receive an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. The ECG pattern and the electrical ventricular instability have been explained by the dispersion of repolarization between the right ventricular epicardium and endocardium, which predisposes to local reexcitation of myocytes with different action potential durations. A disease-causing missense mutation in the cardiac sodium channel gene SCN5A has been recently reported in patients with Brugada syndrome. It is mandatory for the clinician to carefully rule out any organic heart disease before suggesting a diagnosis of Brugada syndrome, because the typical ECG pattern with the risk of sudden arrhythmic death is also observed in patients with structural heart diseases in the setting of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.

Use of the prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator for patients with normal hearts

About 10-20% of patients dying suddenly and unexpectedly do not have structural heart disease. The major causes of sudden death in this population are acute ischemia, the syndrome of right bundle branch block, and ST-elevation from V1 to V3, the long QT-syndrome, and the Wolff-Parkinson-While syndrome. In some patients, none of these syndromes can be recognized and ventricular fibrillation is classified as idiopathic. There are good preventive and therapeutic methods against acute ischemia and there are also curative treatments for the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. Patients with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation cannot be recognized beforehand. However, there are electrocardiographic and genetic markers for the Brugada syndrome and the long QT syndrome. It is, therefore, justified to discuss the possible role of the prophylactic defibrillator to prevent sudden death in these 2 syndromes for which no effective treatment exists. Patients with Brugada syndrome have a high incidence of sudden death, and prophylactic defibrillators are indicated in patients with inducible arrhythmias at electrophysiologic study, irrespective of symptoms. On the contrary, the incidence of sudden death in the long QT syndrome is very low, making prophylactic defibrillator implantation not cost-effective.

Bundle-branch block in a general male population: the study of men born 1913

BACKGROUND

Interest in bundle-branch block has focused primarily on its role as a predictor of mortality and coexisting cardiovascular diseases. Previous studies of prevalence, correlation to cardiovascular disease, and mortality have produced conflicting results.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied a random-sampled population of 855 men who were 50 years old in 1963 and followed them up for 30 years with repeated examinations. Men who developed bundle-branch block were studied with regard to cumulative incidence, relationship with cardiovascular disease/risk factors, and survival. The prevalence of bundle-branch block increases from 1% at age 50 years to 17% at age 80 years, resulting in a cumulative incidence of 18%. No significant relationship with ischemic heart disease or mortality was found. Men who would develop bundle-branch block had a bigger heart volume at age 50 years and developed diabetes mellitus and congestive heart disease during follow-up more often than control subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Bundle-branch block correlates strongly to age and is common in elderly men. Our results support the theory that bundle-branch block is a marker of a slowly progressing degenerative disease that also affects the myocardium.