Medical advances during the Civil War

The contributions to medical care that developed during the Civil War have not been fully appreciated, probably because the quality of care administered was compared against modern standards rather than the standards of the time. The specific accomplishments that constituted major advances were as follows. 1. Accumulation of adequate records and detailed reports for the first time permitted a complete military medical history. This led to the publication of the Medical and Surgical History of the War of the Rebellion, which was identified in Europe as the first major academic accomplishment by US medicine. 2. Development of a system of managing mass casualties, including aid stations, field hospitals, and general hospitals, set the pattern for management of the wounded in World War I, World War II, and the Korean War. 3. The pavilion-style general hospitals, which were well ventilated and clean, were copied in the design of large civilian hospitals over the next 75 years. 4. The importance of immediate, definitive treatment of wounds and fractures was demonstrated and it was shown that major operative procedures, such as amputation, were optimally carried out in the first 24 hours after wounding. 5. The importance of sanitation and hygiene in preventing infection, disease, and death among the troops in the field was demonstrated. 6. Female nurses were introduced to hospital care and Catholic orders entered the hospital business. 7. The experience and training of thousands of physicians were upgraded and they were introduced to new ideas and standards of care. These included familiarity with prevention and treatment of infectious disease, with anesthetic agents, and with surgical principles that rapidly advanced the overall quality of American medical practice. 8. The Sanitary Commission was formed, a civilian-organized soldier's relief society that set the pattern for the development of the American Red Cross.

Contact lenses in the military service

This paper discusses contact lenses in a military environment and reports the results of a literature survey, an extensive questionnaire sent to 1400 spectacle and contact lens wearers, and a short questionnaire given to soldiers taking part in a large scale and long military maneuver. Only a small number of publications were found concerning the relation between adverse environmental conditions and contact lens wearing. In Vietnam dust and poor hygiene often led to eye irritations that precluded the wearing of contact lenses by soldiers. Nevertheless, persons in the army are often in favor of contact lenses. In the air force and navy, wearing contact lenses seems compatible with nearly all military duties. A questionnaire was sent to all known contact lens wearers in the Dutch army and air force and to about an equal number of spectacle wearers. The responses indicate that the proportion of contact lens wearers is 1.8%. The distribution of hard vs. soft lenses was 60 and 40%, respectively. Military personnel wore their lenses during nearly all daily activities. Most contact lens wearers were of the opinion that in military conditions contact lenses have advantages over spectacles. To obtain more information on field exercises, a second questionnaire was handed out immediately after a large-scale NATO field maneuver. Twenty percent of the contact lens wearers had decided in advance not to wear their lenses, but another 30% ceased wearing their lenses during the exercise. It was recommended that for nearly all functions and/or conditions, wearing of contact lenses should be allowed, but that during extended field exercises wearing of hard contact lenses should be discouraged.