A Phase I/II trial of concurrent docetaxel and radiation after induction chemotherapy in patients with poor prognosis squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND

The authors conducted a Phase I/II study in patients with a poor prognosis who had locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) and who were treated initially with induction chemotherapy. Patients were treated with weekly docetaxel and concurrent daily fractionated radiation therapy to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of docetaxel and the efficacy of the regimen.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients were enrolled, and 21 patients were treated. Eight patients had Stage III SCCHN, and 13 patients had Stage IV SCCHN without distant metastases and were treated first with 2-3 cycles of induction chemotherapy, which consisted of cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil with or without leucovorin. Patients with a poor prognosis were identified as those who achieved a partial response to induction treatment, achieved a complete response with a positive biopsy, or were at high risk for developing recurrent disease. Patients were treated subsequently with concurrent, escalating doses of docetaxel (given weekly x 6) and once daily 200-centigray radiation fractions.

RESULTS

Three patients were treated with a weekly docetaxel dose of 20 mg/m(2) without dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Both patients who were treated at the next dose level of 30 mg/m(2) experienced DLT. A dose of 25 mg/m(2) was studied without DLT in the 16 patients who were treated, establishing this as the MTD. Sixty-seven percent of the patients are alive without disease at a median follow-up of 35 months (range, 12-59 months) after the initiation of chemoradiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The MTD of weekly docetaxel with concurrent daily radiation therapy in the postinduction setting was 25 mg/m(2). Disease free survival data from this study were good and indicated that this regimen was effective in the treatment of patients with SCCHN who had a poor prognosis.

Platelet-sparing effect of paclitaxel in heavily pretreated ovarian cancer patients

Carboplatin has proven to be effective in the treatment of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer who have responded to platinum-based first-line chemotherapy. However, thrombocytopenia is a problem in heavily pretreated patients. Paclitaxel has a so-called platelet-sparing effect, but until now it was unknown whether this effect could be obtained in heavily pretreated patients. We treated four patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancers who had previously undergone heavy chemotherapy. Because these patients had responded to platinum-based first-line therapy, single carboplatin administration was employed. Although satisfactory tumor marker responses were obtained, thrombocytopenia occurred. When paclitaxel was administered before the carboplatin infusion in the subsequent treatments, the thrombocytopenia became milder. It was concluded that a platelet-sparing effect was also observed in patients who had undergone heavy prior chemotherapy.

Radiation recall dermatitis from docetaxel

BACKGROUND

Experiences with inflammatory skin reactions after treatment with docetaxel and prior exposure to radiotherapy like a recall phenomenon are very rare. We present the case of an uncommon and severe skin reaction after docetaxel application and prior radiotherapy.

PATIENT AND METHODS

A 40-year-old female was treated with an upper body irradiation with electrons because of relapsed breast cancer. In addition, because of metastases of brain and bone she received radiotherapy on the whole brain and the left pelvis. One week after radiotherapy weekly chemotherapy with docetaxel was started.

RESULTS

Radiotherapy was well tolerated. There was a cutaneous erythema RTOG grade 1. After second application of docetaxel the patient developed a severe skin erythema, after fourth application confluent desquamations exactly demarcated the previously irradiated skin area. After discontinuation of docetaxel and after antiinflammatory treatment the skin reactions improved rapidly.

CONCLUSION

In our opinion the severe skin reaction was clearly associated with the application of docetaxel like a recall phenomenon after previous radiotherapy. In case of severe skin reaction after this therapy it is important to know the possibility of recall phenomenon.

[Reinduction of paclitaxel therapy after a successfully treated hypersensitivity reaction]

INTRODUCTION

Paclitaxel containing chemotherapy is considered to be the first-line adjuvant treatment of epithelial ovarian cancers. Hypersensitive reaction is its most serious side effect including hypotension, respiratory distress, extensive urticaria or an intense cardiotoxicity. Due to these signs several physicians abandon of the otherwise hopeful chemotherapy.

AIM

Having ceased the hypersensitive reaction one could successfully re-induct paclitaxel therapy after a repeated premedication course.

METHOD

A slow paclitaxel infusion rate with a 1/20 dose of the original concentration was administered for reinduction therapy when the patient became symptom-free after treatment with steroid and antihistamines.

RESULT

Paclitaxel treatment was uneventfully instituted after reinduction as hypersensitivity has not been developed again.

CONCLUSION

According to the authors in case of hypersensitive reaction you need not abandon the otherwise effective paclitaxel treatment: it is worthy to institute the reinduction therapy.

Second-line, low-dose, weekly paclitaxel in patients with stage IIIB/IV nonsmall cell lung carcinoma who fail first-line chemotherapy with carboplatin plus paclitaxel

BACKGROUND

Second-line chemotherapy with docetaxel improves survival and quality of life (QoL) in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) who fail first-line platinum-based regimens. The authors sought to determine the activity of second-line, low-dose, weekly paclitaxel in patients with NSCLC who failed first-line chemotherapy with carboplatin plus paclitaxel.

METHODS

Patients with Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC who had received first-line carboplatin/paclitaxel were treated with low-dose (80 mg/m(2)), weekly paclitaxel at the time of disease progression. Response rates, QoL, and survival were outcome end points.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients were included in this analysis. The median age was 62 years (range, 32-76 years), 55% of patients were male, 89% of patients had Stage IV NSCLC, and the Karnofsky performance status was 90-100% in 31% of patients, 70-80% in 55% of patients, and 60% in 14% of patients. Twenty-six percent of patients experienced disease progression as their best response to first-line carboplatin plus paclitaxel, whereas 52% of patients had stable disease, and 23% of patients had achieved a response. The median time from first-line carboplatin plus paclitaxel to second-line, low-dose, weekly paclitaxel was 9.5 weeks (range, 1-78 weeks). The toxicity profile was extremely favorable, with no Grade 4 toxicity and < 10% Grade 3 hematologic or nonhematologic toxicity in all patients with the exception of neuropathy. Ten percent of patients experienced both Grade 2 and Grade 3 neuropathy. The overall objective response rate was 8%. The median survival was 5.2 months (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 3.6-6.2 months), and the 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 20% (95%CI, 10-30%) and 9% (95%CI, 1-16%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Second-line, low-dose, weekly paclitaxel had activity in selected patients with Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC who failed first-line chemotherapy with carboplatin plus paclitaxel. The toxicity profile of this approach is extremely favorable, and outcome expectations are similar to the outcome expectations with other single agents in this setting.

Prospective randomized study of four novel chemotherapy regimens in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: a minnie pearl cancer research network trial

BACKGROUND

The authors compared the toxicity, response rate, and progression free survival of four chemotherapy regimens for patients with advanced (Stage IIIB and IV) nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.

METHODS

A total of 267 patients entered this randomized Phase II trial on one of four arms: paclitaxel, carboplatin, and gemcitabine (Arm A); paclitaxel, carboplatin, and vinorelbine (Arm B); paclitaxel and gemcitabine (Arm C); and gemcitabine and vinorelbine (Arm D). Patient characteristics were similar in all treatment arms. At the time of tumor progression, patients were removed from study and were treated at the discretion of their physician.

RESULTS

Patients received a median of four courses of chemotherapy in all arms, and there was no difference in the dose delivered. There were no statistical differences in response rates (range, 32-45%), median progression free survival (range, 4.9-6.6 months), or progression free survival at 1 year (range, 8-19%). Actuarial survival in all four arms was not different, with a median survival ranging from 8.7 months to 10.7 months and a 1-year survival rate of 38-44%. Each arm was compared with a historic control with a median survival of 8 months. Arm D (gemcitabine and vinorelbine) approached significance at the 0.05 level.

CONCLUSIONS

Two-drug combinations containing the newer drugs without a platinum drug were less toxic than three-drug, platinum-based regimens. There were no significant differences in objective response rates or progression free survival when the four regimens were compared. The two-drug combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine was the least toxic and, thus, may be superior. A Phase III trial comparing combined gemcitabine and vinorelbine with combined paclitaxel, carboplatin, and gemcitabine is ongoing.

Nonneutropenic febrile episodes associated with docetaxel-based chemotherapy in patients with solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Docetaxel is associated with severe lymphopenia and increased incidence of nonneutropenic infection. This study investigated the incidence of nonneutropenic infections and/or febrile episodes in patients with solid tumors receiving frontline docetaxel-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

Chemotherapy-naive patients with solid tumors treated with docetaxel-based chemotherapy were studied prospectively for the development of nonneutropenic infections.

RESULTS

During a 2-year period, 680 cancer patients enrolled in 24 protocols received 2867 cycles of docetaxel-containing chemotherapy. Fifty-three patients (7.8%) developed nonneutropenic infections and/or febrile episodes. The most common of these were pulmonary infections (n = 25), Pneumocystis carinii interstitial pneumonias (n = 5), and candidal (n =11), herpetic (n =4), and cytomegaloviral (n =3) infections. Thirty-six patients (68%) had severe lymphopenia (< 900 cells per deciliter) and 49 (92%) had less than 400 CD4(+) cells per deciliter. Patients with a low CD4(+) cell count (</= 200 cells per deciliter) had a significantly higher probability to develop opportunistic than common infections (P = 0.002). The incidence of nonneutropenic infections and/or febrile episodes was significantly higher in patients treated with docetaxel/gemcitabine (18.3%; P = 0.0001) and docetaxel/CDDP (11.7%; P = 0.012) than in those treated with docetaxel alone (3.6%). Conversely, 175 patients who received 752 cycles of chemotherapy with paclitaxel-containing regimens and 410 patients who received 2174 cycles with nontaxane-based regimens developed 6 (3.4%; p=0.042) and 12 (3%; p=0.001) nonneutropenic infections, respectively. Less than 10% of the patients of the two latter groups were lymphopenic. The risk of nonneutropenic infection in patients receiving docetaxel-based chemotherapy was 2.38 and 2.8 times higher than in patients receiving paclitaxel and nontaxane-based chemotherapy, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with docetaxel-based chemotherapy are at increased risk of developing nonneutropenic infections. This may be related, at least partly, to severe postchemotherapy CD4(+) lymphopenia.

Premedication strategy for weekly paclitaxel

PURPOSE

Dexamethasone and histamine antagonists have been employed commonly as premedications for prophylaxis of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to paclitaxel. Frequent premedications for weekly administration of paclitaxel are associated with added side-effects and extra cost. We analyzed our experience of HSRs to paclitaxel administered every 3-4 weeks, and designed a treatment algorithm to eliminate premedications in a majority of patients receiving weekly paclitaxel.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The incidence of HSRs was analyzed retrospectively in patients who received 3-hr infusions of paclitaxel (135-225 mg/m2) every 3-4 weeks in our institution over a period of 5 years. On the basis of the results of this analysis, we designed a premedication schema for patients receiving weekly paclitaxel, 50-90 mg/m2/week, as follows: Thirty minutes prior to the first weekly dose of paclitaxel, patients received intravenously (i.v.) dexamethasone (10 mg), diphenhydramine (25 mg), and cimetidine (300 mg). If no HSRs occurred, all premedications were deleted for subsequent weekly paclitaxel doses. For patients who experienced HSRs, 20 mg of dexamethasone was given orally 12 and 6 hr prior to re-challenge with paclitaxel in addition to diphenhydramine and cimetidine.

RESULTS

Over a period of 5 years, 358 patients received 1608 3-hr infusions of paclitaxel (135-225 mg/m2). Hypersensitivity reactions, which occurred exclusively during the first cycle of paclitaxel administration, were observed in 14 patients. Of these 14 patients, 11 were successfully retreated with paclitaxel without HSRs, two had recurrent HSRs upon paclitaxel re-challenge, and one refused further treatment. These observations indicate that HSRs to paclitaxel occurred in 4% of patients upon first exposure, that most of these patients can be retreated successfully with paclitaxel without recurrent HSRs, and that if no HSRs occur during the first cycle, HSRs are unlikely to occur with subsequent paclitaxel administration. The premedication schema was applied to 30 patients receiving 205 one-hr infusions of weekly paclitaxel. Using this premedication strategy, no HSRs have been observed during the initial or subsequent administration of paclitaxel.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that this premedication strategy is feasible and worthy of further study for patients receiving weekly paclitaxel.

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of MAG-CPT, a water-soluble polymer conjugate of camptothecin

Polymeric drug conjugates are a new and experimental class of drug delivery systems with pharmacokinetic promises. The antineoplastic drug camptothecin was linked to a water-soluble polymeric backbone (MAG-CPT) and administrated as a 30 min infusion over 3 consecutive days every 4 weeks to patients with malignant solid tumours. The objectives of our study were to determine the maximal tolerated dose, the dose-limiting toxicities, and the plasma and urine pharmacokinetics of MAG-CPT, and to document anti-tumour activity. The starting dose was 17 mg m(-2) day(-1). Sixteen patients received 39 courses at seven dose levels. Maximal tolerated dose was at 68 mg m(-2) day(-1) and dose-limiting toxicities consisted of cumulative bladder toxicity. MAG-CPT and free camptothecin were accumulated during days 1-3 and considerable amounts of MAG-CPT could still be retrieved in plasma and urine after 4-5 weeks. The half-lives of bound and free camptothecin were equal indicating that the kinetics of free camptothecin were release rate dependent. In summary, the pharmacokinetics of camptothecin were dramatically changed, showing controlled prolonged exposure of camptothecin. Haematological toxicity was relatively mild, but serious bladder toxicity was encountered which is typical for camptothecin and was found dose limiting.

Recurrent peripheral arterial thrombosis induced by cisplatin and etoposide

A 64-year-old woman receiving intravenous chemotherapy for stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer experienced acute arterial thrombosis of the distal radial and entire ulnar arteries with subsequent arterial occlusion of the right popliteal artery. Two separate arterial occlusions occurred after administration of cisplatin and etoposide chemotherapy; the second occlusion occurred after rechallenge with the second cycle of chemotherapy. Although venous thrombosis is more common in patients with cancer than in the general population, chemotherapy-induced arterial thrombosis rarely has been reported. To our knowledge, peripheral arterial occlusion after the first and second cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy has not been reported in the literature.

Skin necrosis from extravasation of vinorelbine

Skin necrosis from intravenous infiltration of soft tissue is a rare but potentially devastating complication of intravenous therapy. Vinca alkaloids are among the intravenous drugs with the highest destructive power. We report two cases of skin necrosis from accidental extravasation of vinorelbine, a semisynthetic analogue of vinblastine, rarely described as being responsible for this event. Histopathologic study showed separation of the dermis from necrotic epidermis, associated with cytologic atypia, in both patients, and focal necrosis of eccrine glands in one of them. We consider that intravenous infusions of vinorelbine should be performed using the preventive measures and care applied for other chemotherapeutic agents with high potential for induction of skin necrosis due to extravasation.

Salvage chemotherapy for recurrent spinal cord ependymona

BACKGROUND

Ependymomas are reported to constitute 4% of all primary central nervous system (CNS) malignancies in adults, 30% of which occur in the spinal cord. A prospective Phase II study to determine toxicity and response to chronic oral etoposide in patients with recurrent low-grade intramedullary spinal cord ependymoma (SCE) was conducted.

METHODS

Ten patients (6 males and 4 females with a median age of 30 years) with recurrent SCE were treated with oral etoposide (50mg/m(2)/day given daily for 21 days followed by a 14-day break and then repeated constituted a cycle of therapy). All patients had failed surgery and radiotherapy and four patients had failed one prior chemotherapy. Blood counts were obtained weekly, and neurologic examination and a chemistry panel were performed monthly. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the spine was performed every 8 weeks after a cycle of etoposide and before the next cycle of chemotherapy was initiated.

RESULTS

Treatment-related complications included alopecia in 9 patients, nonbloody diarrhea in 6 patients, a baseline weight loss of > 10% in 5 patients, Grade (according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Scale) 3-4 neutropenia in 3 patients, Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in 3 patients, and Grade 3-4 anemia in 2 patients. There were no treatment-related deaths reported. After 1 cycle of etoposide, 3 patients (30%) demonstrated progressive disease, 2 patients (20%) achieved a partial response, and 5 patients (50%) maintained stable disease. The overall median response or stable disease duration (disease-free progression) was 15 months (range, 2.5-45+ months). The overall median survival was 17.5 months (range, 3-45+ months).

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic oral etoposide appears to be well tolerated, has modest toxicity, and had apparent activity in the small cohort of adults in the current study with surgically and medically refractory, recurrent, intradural intramedullary SCE.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the new taxane analog BMS-184476 given weekly in patients with advanced malignancies

PURPOSE

The study was designed to establish the maximum administered dose and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of BMS-184476, an analogue of paclitaxel, given weekly for 3 consecutive weeks every 28 days, later amended to a regimen of weekly administration for 2 consecutive weeks every 21 days.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Adult patients with solid tumors received BMS-184476 i.v. on days 1, 8, and 15 without premedication. The trial followed a modified accelerated titration design. Doses of 7, 14, 28, 40, 50, and 60 mg/m(2)/wk were investigated. Pharmacokinetics of BMS-184476 in plasma and urine were investigated by high-performance liquid chromatography assay.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients were treated; the maximum administered dose was 60 mg/m(2)/wk, and the MTD was 50 mg/m(2)/wk. Dose-limiting neutropenia was the main toxicity. Neutropenia at the higher dose levels frequently prevented administration of the day 15 dose, and a modified schedule at MTD dosing on days 1 and 8 every 21 days was evaluated and found more feasible for Phase II studies. Diarrhea was the main nonhematological toxicity; other toxicities were vomiting, cumulative fatigue, and loss of appetite. Two patients died of neutropenia-related complications. Antitumor activity was observed in patients with breast and non-small cell lung cancer, with confirmed partial responses in 22% of patients. BMS-184476 was the main species found in the plasma with <5% present as paclitaxel or sulfoxide metabolites. The PKs of BMS-184476 appeared to be linear in the dose range of 7-60 mg/m(2).

CONCLUSION

The recommended dose and schedule of weekly BMS-184476 is 50 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 21 days.

Docetaxel secretion in tears: association with lacrimal drainage obstruction

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that docetaxel may be secreted in tears after intravenous infusion.

DESIGN

Prospective pilot trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Tear fluid was collected from 4 patients receiving docetaxel weekly and 2 patients receiving docetaxel every 3 weeks as a single agent for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Tear samples were collected once prior to and again within 30 minutes following the end of the 1-hour docetaxel infusion. A blood sample was also obtained after infusion. The tear and plasma samples were analyzed for drug content using high-performance liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

Docetaxel was found in the tear samples collected from all 6 patients.

CONCLUSION

The secretion of docetaxel in tears may be a mechanism for canalicular inflammation and tear drainage obstruction, which are known to occur as an adverse effect of the drug.

Irinotecan in relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Indications of activity in a phase II trial

Because irinotecan (CPT-11, Camptosar) is a topoisomerase I inhibitor with a broad spectrum of antitumor clinical activity, we investigated its activity in relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHLs). Irinotecan at 300 mg/m2 i.v. was administered every 21 days with intensive loperamide management of diarrhea. Responders received up to six treatment cycles. Of 44 registered patients, 32 are evaluable for response. Seventeen patients had received one previous regimen, and 15 patients had received two. Disease was refractory to the regimen preceding irinotecan in 12 patients. At baseline, serum lactate dehydrogenase levels were high in 47% (14/30), and beta-2-microglobulin levels were higher than 3.0 mg/L in 29% (8/28) of patients. Responses were seen in 12 of 32 (38%) patients (95% confidence interval [CI] = 21%-56%). Response rates were 43% for seven indolent (95% CI = 10%-82%), 0% for three mantle cell (95% CI = 0%-71%), 44% for 18 relapsed aggressive (95% CI = 22%-69%), and 20% for five refractory aggressive NHLs (95% CI = 1%-72%). Grade 3/4 toxicities included myelosuppression, neutropenic fever, and diarrhea. Irinotecan appears active and relatively well tolerated in patients with relapsed aggressive or indolent NHL. Accrual to this study is continuing for better determination of response rates in all histologic subtypes of NHL.

Dramatic recovery of paclitaxel-disabling neurosensory toxicity following treatment with venlafaxine

Venlafaxine is an antidepressant which acts through the inhibition of the reuptake of norepinephrine and serotonin. Venlafaxine is active against neuropathic and chronic pain. We report the case of a 69-year-old woman who presented a paclitaxel-induced neuropathy. She presented paresthesias, pin pricks in both hands with functional impairment. Venlafaxine hydrochloride was introduced at 37.5 mg twice daily. The patient noticed a dramatic recovery of her symptoms within 2 days, with both reduction of the paresthesias and functional improvement. This is the first report of efficacious use of venlafaxine for the treatment of paclitaxel cumulative neurosensory toxicity.