Posterior Cruciate Ligament Retention versus Posterior Stabilization for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis

Introduction

Although being debated for many years, the superiority of posterior cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA remains controversial. We compare the knee scores, post-operative knee range of motion (ROM), radiological outcomes about knee kinematic and complications between CR TKA and PS TKA.

Methods

Literature published up to August 2015 was searched in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases, and meta-analysis was performed using the software, Review Manager version 5.3.

Results

Totally 14 random control trials (RCTs) on this topic were included for the analysis, which showed that PS and CR TKA had no significant difference in Knee Society knee Score (KSS), pain score (KSPS), Hospital for Special Surgery score (HSS), kinematic characteristics including postoperative component alignment, tibial posterior slope and joint line, and complication rate. However, PS TKA is superior to CR TKA regarding post-operative knee range of motion (ROM) [Random Effect model (RE), Mean Difference (MD) = -7.07, 95% Confidential Interval (CI) -10.50 to -3.65, p<0.0001], improvement of ROM (Fixed Effect model (FE), MD = -5.66, 95% CI -10.79 to -0.53, p = 0.03) and femoral-tibial angle [FE, MD = 0.85, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.25, p<0.0001].

Conclusions

There are no clinically relevant differences between CR and PS TKA in terms of clinical, functional, radiological outcome, and complications, while PS TKA is superior to CR TKA in respects of ROM, while whether this superiority matters or not in clinical practice still needs further investigation and longer follow-up.

Influence of the tourniquet on tibial cement mantle thickness in primary total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was whether the use of a tourniquet increases cement mantle thickness in primary total knee arthroplasty and influences the calculated blood loss and postoperative pain.

METHODS

Ninety patients with a primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were enroled in this prospective randomised trial and divided into a group with (n = 45) and without tourniquet (n = 45). The radiological tibial cement mantle thickness was evaluated postoperatively in four zones on anteroposterior and two zones on lateral radiographs, and values were cumulated. Additionally, the calculated blood loss and postoperative pain levels were recorded.

RESULTS

There was a median cumulative cement mantle thickness of 13 mm (range 8-19 mm) without tourniquet and of 14.2 mm (range 9-18 mm) with tourniquet (p = 0.009). The median calculated blood loss was 0.6 L (range 0.2-2.0 L) without and 0.9 L (range 0.3-1.5 L) (p = 0.02) with tourniquet. Patient-reported postoperative pain levels were significantly higher in the tourniquet group during mobilisation (p = 0.01) and at rest (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a tourniquet in primary TKA increased the tibial cement mantle thickness but also increased the postoperative calculated blood loss and postoperative pain. Surgeons might take this into consideration for decision-making whether to use a tourniquet during TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Does Preoperative Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Influence the Diagnostic Potential of Periprosthetic Tissues in Hip or Knee Infections?

BACKGROUND

Undiagnosed low-grade prosthetic joint infections (PJI) are recognized as an important reason for early failure of presumably aseptic revisions. Preoperatively administered antimicrobial prophylaxis reduces the incidence of PJI but it may reduce the sensitivity of microbiologic periprosthetic tissue cultures and consequently increase the incidence of undiagnosed septic prosthetic joint failures, which can lead to catastrophic serial revisions.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We wished to determine whether administration of preoperative antibiotics decreases the likelihood of diagnosing PJI in patients undergoing revision hip or knee arthroplasty in whom infection is suspected.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled and evaluated 40 patients (29 with THAs and 11 with TKAs) who met the following inclusion criteria: older than 18 years, with suspected PJI of unknown cause, undergoing surgical revision. After arthrotomy, three tissue samples were obtained for microbiologic analysis and diagnosis, and antimicrobial prophylaxis (cefazolin 2 g intravenously) then was administered. Later during the procedure, but before débridement and irrigation, the second set of three tissue samples was obtained from the same surgical area and was cultured. Tissue concentration of prophylactic antibiotic was verified with the second set of samples. A positive culture result was defined as one or more positive cultures (growth on agar at or before 14 days). We then compared the yield on the microbiologic cultures obtained before administration of antibiotics with the yield on the cultures obtained after antibiotics were administered. An a priori analysis was performed; with the numbers available, we had 98% power to detect a difference in diagnostic sensitivity of 33%.

RESULTS

With the numbers available, we found no difference in the likelihood that an infection would be diagnosed between the samples obtained before and after administration of antimicrobial prophylaxis (odds ratio [OR] for positive microbial culture = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.40-2.48; p = 0.99). All measured tissue concentrations of cefazolin were greater than the minimum inhibitory concentration, therefore we found that antibiotic prophylaxis was adequate at the time of second-set tissue specimen recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this small, prospective series suggest that preoperative antimicrobial prophylaxis may be administered safely even in patients undergoing revision hip or knee arthroplasty in which microbiologic sampling is planned without compromising the diagnostic sensitivity of tissue sample cultures. However, before applying our results more generally, our findings need to be confirmed in larger, multicenter studies that would allow evaluation by sex, procedure, bacteriology, and other potentially important factors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, diagnostic study.

[Use of Patient Specific Instruments at Total Knee Arthroplasty. One-Year Results of a Prospective Randomised Study]

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate, at one year of follow-up, radiographic and clinical results of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed with use of Zimmer® Patient Specific Instruments (PSIs) which allow for planning and customising each patient's TKA. MATERIAL AND METHODS Of the patients with knee arthritis who were eligible for joint replacement, 23 were randomly selected and included in this study. There were 11 men and 12 women, with 11 right and 12 left knee joints. On the basis of pre-operative CT scans, PSI custom-made pin guides, which conformed to the individual patient's anatomy, were produced and then used in the THA surgery involving a NexGen (CR) system. All patients were examined before surgery and at 1 year after THA. The evaluation at a follow-up visit included standing full-length radiographs (antero-posterior and lateral), Knee Score results, range of motion (ROM), patient's satisfaction report, and post-operative complications. The X-ray views were examined for mechanical leg axis alignment, TKA alignment in antero-posterior and lateral projection and signs of potential loosening. RESULTS At 1 post-operative year, the average Knee Society Score (KSS) was 85.5 points and the average functional score was 82.6 point. The satisfaction rate was 94% and, on a school rating system, the average mark was 1.3. The average postoperative ROM value was 116°. All patients were willing to undergo the surgery again. The only complication was thrombosis in one patient. Radiographic findings of knee alignment were optimal in 18, correct (up to 3° deviation) in three and incorrect (above 3° deviation) in two patients. Radiographic signs of loosening were not recorded. DISCUSSION Correct knee alignment is one of the requirements for achieving a good TKA outcome. Various techniques are used to improve the total knee process (computer-aided surgery, customised guides). Zimmer Patient Specific Instruments provide advanced pre-operative planning and more accurate implant sizing and alignment. An experienced surgeon can achieve the same good results with conventional planning under standard conditions but the use of PSIs is clearly more beneficial in patients with extra-articular deformities and in patients in whom femoral intramedullary guides cannot be employed. To produce a custom-made pin guide requires a CT scan of the whole leg and is also associated with additional paperwork. The PSIs simplify the total knee process from start to finish and surgeons have complete flexibility to make fine-tuning adjustments during the procedure. CONCLUSIONS Zimmer Patient Specific Instruments allow for exact alignment of both the femoral and the tibial component in a TKA process. Under standard circumstances, clinical and radiographic outcomes are comparable with those of conventional planning. However, the use of PSIs is clearly more beneficial in patients with extra-articular deformities and in patients in whom femoral intramedullary guides cannot be employed.

KEY WORDS

total knee arthroplasty, TKA, Patient Specific Instruments, PSIs.

Good survivorship of all-polyethylene tibial component UKA at long-term follow-up

PURPOSES

To determine the long-term survival rate of an all-polyethylene tibial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in a large series of consecutive patients and to investigate the possible factors that could influence the outcome.

METHODS

A retrospective evaluation of 273 patients at 6-13 years of follow-up was performed. Clinical evaluation was based on KSS and WOMAC scores. Subjective evaluation was based on a visual analogue scale for pain self-assessment. Radiographic evaluation was performed to assess femoral-tibial angle (FTA), posterior tibial slope (PTS) and tibial plateau angle (TPA). A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed assuming revision for any reason as primary endpoint.

RESULTS

The 10-year implant survivorship was 87.6%. Twenty-five revisions (9.2%) were performed, and aseptic loosening of the tibial component was the most common failure mode (11 cases, 4%). The comparison of survival rate according to age at surgery did not show significant difference. Age at surgery, FTA, TPA and PTS were not related to higher risk of revision. No correlations were found between BMI, age at surgery and clinical scores. Finally, no statistical differences of radiographic measurements were found between revisions and non-revisions.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study has demonstrated on a large series of patients that UKA with an all-polyethylene tibial component, with an accurate technique and a proper patient selection, can provide a satisfactory clinical and functional outcome and a good overall survivorship of the implant at long-term follow-up. These advantages could be achieved at a lower cost.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective Therapeutic Study, Level IV.

Double metal tibial blocks augmentation in total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Severe uncontained tibial bone defects occurring during total knee arthroplasty are challenging, and which treatment method is the best remains unknown. In this study, clinical and radiographic outcomes of double metal blocks augmentation were examined.

METHODS

Between 2004 and 2012, double metal blocks augmentation was carried out in 17 patients with severe asymmetric uncontained tibial bone defects. The first block was attached to the tibial tray with screws, and then the second block was cemented to the first block. Out of 17 patients, 13 (8 primary, 5 revision) were available for final follow-up at a median of 69 months (range 24-99). For clinical assessment, range of motion and Knee Society score were evaluated preoperatively and annually thereafter. At the final follow-up, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Oxford knee, Short Form-36, Lower extremity functional scale, and Lower extremity activity scale scores were evaluated. Radiographic assessment for radiolucent lines at the block-cement-bone interfaces and signs of failure was performed annually using fluoroscopy and standard radiographs.

RESULTS

Range of motion and Knee Society score were significantly improved post-operatively. Other clinical outcomes were favourable. Radiolucent lines were seen on fluoroscopy in three knees, but no sign of failure, such as loosening, collapse, or instability, was observed at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Double metal blocks augmentation is a favourable and useful method, which does not cause mechanical failure or protrusion of the prosthetic because of its modularity, to manage severe asymmetric uncontained proximal tibial bone defects >15 mm in total knee arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case series, Level IV.

[Mixed knee arthrodesis a rescue alternative in knee periprosthetic joint infection]

BACKGROUND

Knee arthrodesis is a rescue procedure for patients with knee periprosthetic joint infection who are not candidates for a revision surgery. The actual methods present a high complication rate with only moderate efectivity.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 17 cases, of patients with knee periprosthetic joint infection and bone loss treated by intramedular expandable nail and monoplanar external fixator with a mínimum evolution of 1 year, evaluating the medical records and digitalized X-rays by 2 sub specialized doctors in osteoarticular rescue surgery.

RESULTS

From the 17 patients, 88.2% were classified as Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute classification grade (III) and the 11.2% IIB. We obtained fusion in 82.5%, staged Hammer (I-II) in a mean time of 6.33 months. Achieving independent gait was reported in 88.2%. Our complication rate was 47.1%, most of them minor complications except for a supracondylar amputation. Our infection recurrence rate was 35.4%. Mean intervention rate was 2.47 surgeries, all without any operative room complication.

CONCLUSIONS

We achieved a fusion rate similar to other available knee arthrodesis methods in a similar treatment time; with lower complication rate, making it a suitable rescue alternative for knee arthrodesis in patients with significant bone loss and knee periprosthetic joint infection.

[CLINICAL APPLICATION OF OXFORD MOBILE-BEARING BIPOLAR PROSTHESIS UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY FOR SINGLE COMPARTMENTAL KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of Oxford mobile-bearing bipolar prosthesis unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in the treatment of single compartmental knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS

Between June 2011 and July 2013, 22 cases of single compartmental knee osteoarthritis were treated by Oxford mobile-bearing bipolar prosthesis UKA. Of 22 cases, 8 were male and 14 were female with an average age of 65 years (range, 45-80 years); the left knee was involved in 12 cases, and the right knee in 10 cases, with a mean disease duration of 32.5 months (range, 8-90 months). The mean weight was 55.2 kg (range, 50-65 kg), and the mean body mass index was 20.8 kg/m2 (range, 17-25 kg/m2). Osteoarthritis involved in the single knee medial compartment in all patients. Knee society score (KSS) and range of motion (ROM) were measured to evaluate the knee joint function.

RESULTS

Primary healing of incision was obtained in all patients, and there was no complication of infection, bedsore, or deep venous thrombosis. Postoperative follow-up was 2-4 years (mean, 3.2 years). The X-ray films showed good position of prosthesis, no prosthesis dislocation, or periprosthetic infection during follow-up. Knee ROM, KSS function score, and KSS clinical score were significantly improved at 1 week after operation and at last follow-up when compared with preoperative ones (P < 0.05), but no significant difference was shown between at 1 week and at last follow-up (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Oxford mobile-bearing bipolar prosthesis UKA is an effective method to treat single compartmental knee osteoarthritis, with the advantages of less trauma, earlier rehabilitation exercise, near physiological state in joint function, and less risk of complications.

Computer-assisted navigation is beneficial both in primary and revision surgery with modular rotating-hinge knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The objective of the present study was to explore the effect of navigation on the reconstruction of the mechanical leg axis, implant positioning and the restoration of the joint line in hinged knee arthroplasty in vivo. We present the first 1- to 3-year clinical and radiological results following computer-navigated implantation of the EnduRo modular rotating-hinge knee arthroplasty system (Aesculap AG, Tuttlingen, Germany) as a primary or revision implant.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients were analysed retrospectively. Indication was revision surgery in 18 patients and complex primary surgery in 13. The clinical and radiological results of 31 patients with a minimum follow-up of 12 months (mean 22.2 ± 6.2 months) were recorded. Age at follow-up was 55.2 ± 9.9 years.

RESULTS

The absolute varus-valgus deviation from the neutral mechanical leg axis was determined at 5.1° ± 5.1° preoperatively and 2.1° ± 1.4° postoperatively. No intraoperative complications or problems with the navigation system were observed. At latest follow-up, no component loosening was detected. Based on the Knee Society Score, a knee score of 64.9 ± 17.7 points and a function score of 67.2 ± 27.3 points were achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

Encouraging short-term clinical and radiological results with the computer-navigated implantation of the modular rotating-hinge EnduRo knee arthroplasty system were found in both primary and revision surgery. The navigation facilitated the reconstruction of the leg axis, implant positioning and the restoration of the joint line.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Comparison between patient-specific instruments and conventional instruments and computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

The current study investigated the accuracy in achieving proper lower limb alignment and individual component positions after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with 3 different instrumentation techniques. It was hypothesized that patient-specific instruments (PSI) would achieve more accurate lower limb alignment and component positions compared to conventional instruments (CON).

METHODS

Ninety knees in 81 patients were randomized in 1:1:1 ratio into CON, computer navigation (NAV) and PSI groups to receive TKA. The surgical routines were standardized. The lower limb mechanical axis and individual component positions were assessed on standard radiographs. Tourniquet time, operation time and patients' functional scores were documented.

RESULTS

Conventional instruments and PSI were more likely to result in an excessively flexed femoral component (p = 0.001) compared to NAV. Number of outliers in postoperative lower limb alignment, and other components positions in the coronal and sagittal plane showed no statistically significant difference. The mean tourniquet time and operation time was significantly shorter in CON and PSI groups than NAV group (p < 0.001). Four early complications occurred in the PSI group (p = 0.015). At 3-month follow-up, there was no difference in terms of the knee range of motion and patients' function among the 3 groups.

CONCLUSION

No significant radiological and clinical benefit could be demonstrated in using PSI over CON or NAV in TKA. Routine use of PSI is not recommended because of the extra cost and waiting time.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Direct, Cementless, Metaphyseal Fixation in Knee Revision Arthroplasty With Sleeves-Short-Term Results

Different options for implant fixation in revision TKA exist. Small series have been published on direct cementless fixation with sleeves. The objective of this study was to analyze the short- and mid-term results of sleeve-fixation in a large revision TKA series. In this prospective study 121 patients with 193 sleeves (119 tibial and 74 femoral) were included. Mean follow-up was 3.6 years (2-6.1 years). Analysis included clinical and radiographic assessment. ROM, KSS and Functional Score improved significantly. Fourteen patients (11.4%) underwent operative re-revision during the follow-up period. Direct cementless fixation in the metaphysis by sleeves is a promising option for implant fixation in revision TKA, both on the tibial and femoral side.

Risk calculators predict failures of knee and hip arthroplasties: findings from a large health maintenance organization

BACKGROUND

Considering the cost and risk associated with revision Total knee arthroplasty (TKAs) and Total hip arthroplasty (THAs), steps to prevent these operations will help patients and reduce healthcare costs. Revision risk calculators for patients may reduce revision surgery by supporting clinical decision-making at the point of care.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We sought to develop a TKA and THA revision risk calculator using data from a large health-maintenance organization's arthroplasty registry and determine the best set of predictors for the revision risk calculator.

METHODS

Revision risk calculators for THAs and TKAs were developed using a patient cohort from a total joint replacement registry and data from a large US integrated healthcare system. The cohort included all patients who had primary procedures performed in our healthcare system between April 2001 and July 2008 and were followed until January 2014 (TKAs, n = 41,750; THAs, n = 22,721), During the study period, 9% of patients (TKA = 3066/34,686; THA=1898/20,285) were lost to followup and 7% died (TKA= 2350/41,750; THA=1419/20,285). The outcome of interest was revision surgery and was defined as replacement of any component for any reason within 5 years postoperatively. Candidate predictors for the revision risk calculator were limited to preoperative patient demographics, comorbidities, and procedure diagnoses. Logistic regression models were used to identify predictors and the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test and c-statistic were used to choose final models for the revision risk calculator.

RESULTS

The best predictors for the TKA revision risk calculator were age (odds ratio [OR], 0.96; 95% CI, 0.95-0.97; p < 0.001), sex (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.75-0.95; p = 0.004), square-root BMI (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.99-1.11; p = 0.140), diabetes (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.17-1.48; p < 0.001), osteoarthritis (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.84-1.62; p = 0.368), posttraumatic arthritis (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.07-2.56; p = 0.022), and osteonecrosis (OR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.31-4.92; p = 0.006). The best predictors for the THA revision risk calculator were sex (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.05-1.46; p = 0.010), age (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.98-0.99; p < 0.001), square-root BMI (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.00-1.15; p = 0.066), and osteoarthritis (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.66-1.09; p = 0.190).

CONCLUSIONS

Study model parameters can be used to create web-based calculators. Surgeons can enter personalized patient data in the risk calculators for identification of risk of revision which can be used for clinical decision making at the point of care. Future prospective studies will be needed to validate these calculators and to refine them with time.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, prognostic study.

Reliability of patient specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty

The aim of this study was to compare the precision between Patient Specific Instrumentation (PSI) and Conventional Instrumentation (CI) as determined intra-operatively by a pinless navigation system. Eighty patients were included in this prospective comparative study and they were divided into two homogeneous groups. We defined an original score from 6 to 30 points to evaluate the accuracy of the position of the cutting guides. This score is based on 6 objective criteria. The analysis indicated that PSI was not superior to conventional instrumentation in the overall score (p = 0.949). Moreover, no statistically significant difference was observed for any individual criteria of our score. Level of evidence II.

Changes in surface topography at the TKA backside articulation following in vivo service: a retrieval analysis

PURPOSE

With the advent of modular total knee arthroplasty (TKA) systems, backside wear at the articulation between the ultra-high-molecular-weight-polyethylene (UHMWPE) component undersurface and the tibial baseplate has received increasing attention as a source of clinically significant polyethylene wear debris. The aim of this study was to investigate the reciprocating interface at the TKA undersurface articulation using profilometry after in vivo service. Our null hypothesis was that there would be no discernible pattern or relationship between the metal tibial baseplate and UHMWPE surface profile.

METHODS

A nanoscale analysis of thirty retrieved fixed-bearing TKA explants was performed. Surface roughness (Sa) and skewness (Ssk) were measured on both the UHMWPE component undersurface and the tibial baseplate of explants using a non-contacting profilometer (1 nm resolution). Four pristine unimplanted components of two different designs (Stryker Kinemax and DePuy PFC) were examined for control purposes.

RESULTS

Mean explant baseplate surface roughness was 1.24 μm (0.04-3.01 μm). Mean explant UHMWPE undersurface roughness was 1.16 μm (0.23-2.44 μm). Each explant had an individual roughness pattern with unique baseplate and undersurface UHMWPE surface roughness that was different from, but closely related to, surface topography observed in control implants of the same manufacturer and design. Following in vivo service, UHMWPE undersurface showed changes towards a negative skewness, demonstrating that wear is occurring at the backside interface.

CONCLUSION

In vivo loading of the TKA prosthesis leads to measurable changes in surface profile at the backside articulation, which appear to be dependent on several factors including implant design and in vivo duration. These findings are consistent with wear occurring at this surface. Findings of this study would support the use of a polished tibial tray over an unpolished design in total knee arthroplasty with the goal of reducing PE wear by means of providing a smoother backside countersurface for the UHMWPE component.

Gap-balancing technique combined with patient-specific instrumentation in TKA

INTRODUCTION

Combining patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) with a balancer device in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to achieve functional femoral rotational alignment is a novel technique. The primary goal of this study was to introduce a new method to combine PSI with a gap-balancing technique and to determine the impact of the technique on rotation of the femoral component.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-five primary TKAs (15 women, 10 men) were prospectively studied. All TKAs involved PSI with an associated gap-balancing device. Front plane alignment was performed intraoperatively with the PSI, followed by rectangular, symmetrical extension and creation of a flexion gap using the balancer device to set the femoral rotation.

RESULTS

Femoral component rotation was between 3° internal and 6° external rotation versus the transepicondylar axis. There were no postoperative signs of patellofemoral dysfunction. In no cases was the resulting joint line displacement >3 mm. The mean elevation was 1.2 ± 0.9 mm (range 0-3). The leg axis was straight in all cases (±3°), at a mean of 1.6° ± 1.0° varus (range 0°-3° varus).

CONCLUSIONS

PSI was with the gap-balancing technique was successfully used without affecting anatomical alignment. With the balancer device, PSI can be used more widely than techniques based solely on landmarks, as the soft-tissue tension can be taken into account, thus virtually eliminating flexion instabilities.

Do Standard Surgical Guides Produce Accurate and Precise Femoral Bone Resections During Total Knee Arthroplasty?

PURPOSE

Accurate alignment and balanced flexion and extension gaps are critical elements in achieving a successful outcome following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The ability to make accurate and precise bone cuts is essential in the creation of balanced gaps. We sought to determine if one type of modern-day standard surgical instrument using an intramedullary rod and posterior referencing produces accurate and precise distal and posterior femoral bone resections.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-five consecutive patients undergoing TKA were divided into three groups, with 25 patients in each group receiving one of three implant designs: 25 Stryker Triathlon® CR (Stryker, Mahwah, NJ), 25 Zimmer NexGen® Flex CR (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN), and 25 StelKast Proven Gen-FlexTM CR (StelKast, Pittsburgh, PA). Flexion-extension gap matching was determined using only the medial flexion and extension gaps. Accuracy was determined by comparing actual resection thickness to desired resection thickness. "Optimal" accuracy was considered to be within 1.0mm of desired, and "near-optimal" accuracy was considered to be within 2.0mm of the desired resection thickness. Precision was determined by the variability of resection thicknesses within each system.

RESULTS

Data demonstrated a lack of accuracy and precision across all three tested systems, with each system resulting in certain unique tendencies. Only one out of 75 cases resulted in optimal resection accuracy with all three cuts (Zimmer). When lowering the threshold to include both optimal and near-optimal (within 2 mm of error) with all three cuts, only one third of Stryker and Zimmer cases and two thirds of StelKast cases achieved this threshold, representing 44% of cases (33/75).

CONCLUSIONS

Improvements in instrumentation to increase accuracy and precision may be warranted. Errors in fixation may be due to the instrumentation itself, and altering instrumentation to include less modularity, provide more stable fixation, and more reliably seal the implant on the femur may be of benefit.

Highly Crosslinked-remelted versus Less-crosslinked Polyethylene in Posterior Cruciate-retaining TKAs in the Same Patients

BACKGROUND

Concern regarding osteolysis attributable to polyethylene wear after TKA, particularly in younger patients, has prompted the introduction of highly crosslinked-remelted polyethylene (HXLPE) for TKAs. However, few in vivo comparative results of TKAs using HXLPE and less-crosslinked polyethylene inserts in the same patients are available, regarding fracture or failure of the locking mechanism of tibial polyethylene inserts or of osteolysis in patients younger than 60 years.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We wanted to determine whether (1) survivorship free from aseptic loosening in knees with HXLPE inserts was different from survivorship in knees with less-crosslinked polyethylene inserts, (2) the prevalence of fracture or failure of the locking mechanism of the tibial polyethylene insert was greater in knees with HXLPE than in those with less-crosslinked polyethylene, and (3) the proportion of patients who had osteolysis develop was greater with HXLPE than with less-crosslinked polyethylene inserts.

METHODS

One hundred seventy-one patients with a mean age of 58 ± 8 years (range, 35-59 years) received posterior cruciate-retaining prostheses with a less-crosslinked polyethylene tibial insert in one knee and a HXLPE tibial insert in the contralateral knee. From January 2007 to January 2010, we performed 366 same-day bilateral simultaneous sequential posterior cruciate-retaining TKAs in 183 patients, of whom 171 (93%) participated in this study. All patients during this study period underwent posterior cruciate-retaining TKAs regardless of deformity of the knees and we did not perform posterior-stabilized TKAs during the same period. Patients who had bilateral end-stage osteoarthritis and were younger than 60 years were selected for inclusion. Six patients (4%) were lost to followup before 5 years. Twenty-six patients were males and 145 were females. The mean duration of followup was 6 years (range, 5-8 years). At each followup, patients were assessed for loosening of the components, fracture or failure of the locking mechanism of the polyethylene inserts, or osteolysis.

RESULTS

The survival rate of the knee prosthesis at a mean of 5.8 years after surgery was 100% (95% CI, 0.95-1.00) in both groups for the endpoint aseptic loosening and 99.4% (95% CI, 0.95-1.00) in both groups for the endpoint revision. No knee in either group had fracture or failure of the locking mechanism of the tibial polyethylene insert, and none had osteolysis.

CONCLUSIONS

With the numbers available, we found no clinically important differences between HXLPE and less-crosslinked polyethylene inserts in posterior cruciate-retaining TKAs. Given that HXLPE is newer, as-yet unproven, and more expensive than the proven technology (less-crosslinked polyethylene), we suggest not adopting HXLPE for clinical use until it shows superiority.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, therapeutic study.

Kaplan-Meier Survival Analysis Overestimates the Risk of Revision Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although Kaplan-Meier survival analysis is commonly used to estimate the cumulative incidence of revision after joint arthroplasty, it theoretically overestimates the risk of revision in the presence of competing risks (such as death). Because the magnitude of overestimation is not well documented, the potential associated impact on clinical and policy decision-making remains unknown.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We performed a meta-analysis to answer the following questions: (1) To what extent does the Kaplan-Meier method overestimate the cumulative incidence of revision after joint replacement compared with alternative competing-risks methods? (2) Is the extent of overestimation influenced by followup time or rate of competing risks?

METHODS

We searched Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS Previews, and Web of Science (1946, 1980, 1980, and 1899, respectively, to October 26, 2013) and included article bibliographies for studies comparing estimated cumulative incidence of revision after hip or knee arthroplasty obtained using both Kaplan-Meier and competing-risks methods. We excluded conference abstracts, unpublished studies, or studies using simulated data sets. Two reviewers independently extracted data and evaluated the quality of reporting of the included studies. Among 1160 abstracts identified, six studies were included in our meta-analysis. The principal reason for the steep attrition (1160 to six) was that the initial search was for studies in any clinical area that compared the cumulative incidence estimated using the Kaplan-Meier versus competing-risks methods for any event (not just the cumulative incidence of hip or knee revision); we did this to minimize the likelihood of missing any relevant studies. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) comparing the cumulative incidence estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with the competing-risks method for each study and used DerSimonian and Laird random effects models to pool these RRs. Heterogeneity was explored using stratified meta-analyses and metaregression.

RESULTS

The pooled cumulative incidence of revision after hip or knee arthroplasty obtained using the Kaplan-Meier method was 1.55 times higher (95% confidence interval, 1.43-1.68; p < 0.001) than that obtained using the competing-risks method. Longer followup times and higher proportions of competing risks were not associated with increases in the amount of overestimation of revision risk by the Kaplan-Meier method (all p > 0.10). This may be due to the small number of studies that met the inclusion criteria and conservative variance approximation.

CONCLUSIONS

The Kaplan-Meier method overestimates risk of revision after hip or knee arthroplasty in populations where competing risks (such as death) might preclude the occurrence of the event of interest (revision). Competing-risks methods should be used to more accurately estimate the cumulative incidence of revision when the goal is to plan healthcare services and resource allocation for revisions.

The posterior condylar offset ratio and femoral anatomy in anterior versus posterior referencing total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The preservation of joint anatomy is one of the key issues in total knee arthroplasty. The effect of the prosthesis' referencing system, relative to femoral anatomy, remains unknown. It was sought to determine if femoral anatomy, following total knee arthroplasty is better maintained using either anterior referencing or posterior referencing prosthesis. The posterior condylar offset ratio (PCOR) was employed for preoperative and postoperative radiographic comparison of femoral condyles. It was hypothesized that posterior referencing prosthesis would better restore condylar morphology.

METHODS

Sixty-six patients undergoing a total knee arthroplasty with anterior referenced Zimmer(®) NexGen(®) LPS prosthesis and ninety-one with posterior referenced Tornier(®) HLS Noetos(®) were divided into two groups according to the prosthetic model used and retrospectively compared. PCOR was calculated as the quotient of the distance between the posterior condylar border and the tangent to the posterior cortex of the femoral diaphysis, and the distance between the posterior condylar border and the tangent to the anterior cortex of the femoral diaphysis. PCOR was determined preoperatively and postoperatively and compared within each group and between both groups.

RESULTS

An increase in the PCOR (P<0.0001) following surgery was observed in both anterior referencing and posterior referencing models. No difference was noted when the postoperative PCOR was compared between both groups (P=0.61).

CONCLUSION

Both anterior and posterior referencing prosthesis lead to a similar increase of the PCOR following total knee arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Total Knee Replacement and Imaging

Total knee replacement (total knee arthroplasty) is performed to restore function and relieve pain in patients with severely damaged knees. The surgery involves replacement of both the medial and lateral femorotibial joints and the patellofemoral joint. Although total knee replacement is an effective treatment, postoperative complications include blood clots, infection, and loosening or malalignment of the prosthetic component. Medical imaging plays a critical role in preoperative evaluation, surgical planning, and followup.

The indirect cost of Patient-Specific Instruments

PURPOSE

To calculate the indirect costs of Patient Specific Instruments (PSI) based on an opportunity cost, cost of efforts and a supply chain cost model to compare PSI for value with conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

In 81 patients the total (direct+indirect) cost of PSI-assisted TKA was compared with conventional TKA. Surgical times and coronal mechanical alignment were measured to evaluate the effectiveness of the PSI system.

RESULTS

Indirect costs (459 euro) make up 40% of the total cost that can run up to 1142 euro for a patient operated with PSI guides. No difference in surgical times or coronal alignment was observed in between both groups.

CONCLUSION

Considering the total cost of PSI no value was found for the use of PSI in primary TKA as measured by surgical times or for obtaining a neutral mechanical axis in the coronal plane.

Clinical outcomes after high-flex versus conventional total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

To compare clinical outcomes after high-flex versus conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-regression were performed to compare post-operative outcomes between the two types of prostheses. Relevant randomized controlled trials were identified from MEDLINE and Scopus up to November, 2014.

RESULTS

Fourteen of 369 studies were eligible; 14, 7, 6, 5, 3, 12 and 7 studies were included in the pooling of maximum knee flexion, Knee Society Knee Score (KS), Knee Society Function Score (FS), Hospital for Special Surgery score (HSS), short-form (SF) physical activity score, post-operative complications (DVT, fractures, infection) and revision TKA, respectively. The high-flex TKA had 1.97° [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37, 3.57], -0.86 (95% CI -1.65, 0.07) and -1.34 (-2.57, -0.11) higher mean maximum knee flexion, KS and FS when compared to conventional TKA. However, there were non-significant differences in HSS, SF-36 (physical), complications and revision TKA.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that there are improvements in post-operative knee range of motion and knee scores in high-flex TKA implants when compared to conventional TKA implants; however, the difference was very small and therefore might not have any clinical impact. Therefore, conventional TKA can be used as a substitute. However, cost-effective analysis should be performed to make appropriate selections in the future. There are no statistically significant differences in terms of HSS, quality of life, complications and revisions between the groups.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Comparative Epidemiology of Revision Arthroplasty: Failed THA Poses Greater Clinical and Economic Burdens Than Failed TKA

BACKGROUND

Revision THA and TKA are growing and important clinical and economic challenges. Healthcare systems tend to combine revision joint replacement procedures into a single service line, and differences between revision THA and revision TKA remain incompletely characterized. These differences carry implications for guiding care and resource allocation. We therefore evaluated epidemiologic trends associated with revision THAs and TKAs.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We sought to determine differences in (1) the number of patients undergoing revision TKA and THA and respective demographic trends; (2) differences in the indications for and types of revision TKA and THA; (3) differences in patient severity of illness scoring between THA and TKA; and (4) differences in resource utilization (including cost and length of stay [LOS]) between revision THA and TKA.

METHODS

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) was used to evaluate 235,857 revision THAs and 301,718 revision TKAs between October 1, 2005 and December 31, 2010. Patient characteristics, procedure information, and resource utilization were compared across revision THAs and TKAs. A revision burden (ratio of number of revisions to total number of revision and primary surgeries) was calculated for hip and knee procedures. Severity of illness scoring and cost calculations were derived from the NIS. As our study was principally descriptive, statistical analyses generally were not performed; however, owing to the large sample size available to us through this NIS analysis, even small observed differences presented are likely to be highly statistically significant.

RESULTS

Revision TKAs increased by 39% (revision burden, 9.1%-9.6%) and THAs increased by 23% (revision burden, 15.4%-14.6%). Revision THAs were performed more often in older patients compared with revision TKAs. Periprosthetic joint infection (25%) and mechanical loosening (19%) were the most common reasons for revision TKA compared with dislocation (22%) and mechanical loosening (20%) for revision THA. Full (all-component) revision was more common in revision THAs (43%) than in TKAs (37%). Patients who underwent revision THA generally were sicker (> 50% major severity of illness score) than patients who underwent revision TKA (65% moderate severity of illness score). Mean LOS was longer for revision THAs than for TKAs. Mean hospitalization costs were slightly higher for revision THA (USD 24,697 +/- USD 40,489 [SD]) than revision TKA (USD 23,130 +/- USD 36,643 [SD]). Periprosthetic joint infection and periprosthetic fracture were associated with the greatest LOS and costs for revision THAs and TKAs.

CONCLUSIONS

These data could prove important for healthcare systems to appropriately allocate resources to hip and knee procedures: the revision burden for THA is 52% greater than for TKA, but revision TKAs are increasing at a faster rate. Likewise, the treating clinician should understand that while both revision THAs and TKAs bear significant clinical and economic costs, patients undergoing revision THA tend to be older, sicker, and have greater costs of care.

The Use of an Electronic System for Soft Tissue Balancing in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasties: Clinical and Radiological Evaluation

The eLibra® Dynamic Knee Balancing System (Synvasive Technology, Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) is an instrument designed to address the flexion stability during a TKA. It provides an objective measurement of the soft-tissue forces in the two compartments before the final cuts are made, allowing to obtain patient-specific rotational orientation of the femoral component. Between March 2010 and March 2012, the eLibra® system was used during the implantation of 75 TKAs in 75 patients at the author's institution. Preoperative and postoperative clinical assessment were evaluated using the Knee Society Score (KSS) and the Visual Analogical Scale (VAS). Radiographic evaluation was performed with weight-bearing radiographs in antero-posterior and lateral views in order to study the presence of radiolucencies. In a sample of 20 patients, representative of the population studied, the rotation of the femoral component was measured by two independent observers using the C-arm Cone Beam CT scan (XperCT/Allura FD20 angiography system; Philips, Best, Netherlands). At a mean follow-up of 42.3 months (29-54 months), three patients died from causes not related to the surgery. We had one case of aseptic loosening three years after surgery. None of the patients reported complications peri- or postoperatively. Clinical evaluation showed an improvement in KSS scoring, from preoperative means of 48.35 and 47.53 points for clinical and functional aspects, respectively, to postoperative means of 88.03 and 91.2 points, respectively (p<0.001 for both aspects). The current study demonstrates that the use of the eLibra® device is simple and reproducible. It could help surgeons objectively quantify ligament balance and perform soft tissue-guided resection in a reproducible way, resulting in better post-operative stability and reduced complications. The use of the postoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), in a representative sample of patients, revealed a specific and optimal orientation of the femoral component with a mean of 2.18° of external rotation.

Can Sequentially-irradiated and Annealed Highly Cross-linked Polyethylene Inserts Thinner than Eight-millimeters Be Utilized in Total Knee Arthroplasty?

The routine use of highly cross-linked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) has remained controversial secondary to the possibility of decreased material properties when compared to conventional UHMWPE. The aim of the present study was to evaluate if thin, sequentially-irradiated, and annealed highly cross-linked UHMWPE tibial inserts would have improved wear properties, while maintaining mechanical integrity, compared to conventional UHMWPE during biomechanical testing under aligned and malaligned conditions. Polyethylene inserts (4.27 and 6.27 mm) manufactured from GUR 1020-UHMWPE were cyclically loaded to analyze for wear. All wear scars were visually examined after loading using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Volume loss was plotted versus cycle count with linear regression analysis yielding wear rates. There was no statistical difference in wear between both thicknesses for all testing conditions. During aligned condition testing, the volumetric wear rate for sequentially-irradiated and annealed polyethylene thicknesses of 4.27 and 6.27 mm was 4.0 and 4.4 mm3/million cycles; and during malaligned conditions, it was 13.9 and 15.1 mm3/million cycles. For conventional polyethylene during aligned conditions, the volumetric wear rate was 33.0 and 22.8 mm3/million cycles; and during malaligned conditions it was 50.0 and 50.8 mm3/million cycles. By SEM evaluation, condylar wear surfaces for conventional and sequentially-irradiated and annealed polyethylene displayed surface ripples typical of adhesive wear. There were no observed visible differences between the wear scars for conventional compared to sequentially-irradiated and annealed polyethylene with no evidence of fatigue failure. This study demonstrated no differences between polyethylenes with thicknesses of 4.27 and 6.27 mm. This strengthens the conclusion that sequentially-irradiated and annealed highly cross-linked UHMWPE can be utilized in total knee arthroplasty. The successful wear properties of 4.27 mm liners could mean that smaller tibial resections leading to bone stock preservation could be utilized in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty, although further in-vivo studies are needed.

Molded Articulating Cement Spacers for Two-Stage Treatment of Infected THA and TKA

Articulating spacers have been reported to promote greater range of motion, preserve bone, facilitate reimplantation, and enhance functional recovery, as well as provide a vehicle for local administration of antibiotics. The purpose of this study was to review patients treated at our center for deep hip and knee infection with two-staged exchange using molded, articulating antibiotic-laden cement spacers following debridement. A query of our practice registry revealed 84 patients (84 hips) and 177 patients (182 knees) diagnosed with deep infection after THA and TKA respectively, and treated with two-staged exchange using molded articulating cement spacers. Mean follow-up was three years in both groups. Second-stage reimplantation was accomplished in 81 hips, and reinfection occurred in 11 of those (14%), with three responding to a single irrigation and debridement (I&D) procedure, one undergoing two I&Ds, one chronically infected diabetic patient treated with one-stage exchange to cemented components, five patients undergoing multiple procedures including repeat two-staged exchange in four, and one patient declining further treatment. Harris hip score at most recent averaged 69. Second-stage reimplantation was accomplished in 177 knees, and reinfection occurred in 28 of those (16%). Range of motion improved from 93° preoperatively to 101° at most recent, Knee Society clinical scores improved from 46 to 76, and functional scores improved from 32 to 47. Treatment of deep infection after total joint arthroplasty using molded, articulating antibiotic-laden acrylic cement spacers was successful in eradicating infection in 83% of hips (70 of 84) and 82% of knees (149 of 182) at an average of three years after reimplantation.

Effect of simulated early weight bearing on micromotion and pullout strength of uncemented distal femoral stems

The effect of simulated early weight bearing on both micromotion and pullout strength of uncemented distal femoral stems was evaluated in this study. The effect of stem endosteal contact and bone quality on implant pullout strength was also analyzed. A randomized matched-pair study was performed using 8 bilateral pairs of fresh human cadaveric femoral specimens. Each specimen pair was dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scanned, uniformly implanted, fluoroscopically imaged, and randomly assigned to the cycled or uncycled group. The cycled group received 5000 cycles of axial compressive loading (to 700 N) and the contralateral side was not cycled. Micromotion was monitored during cycling and compared with a failure threshold (150 µm), and all implants underwent direct axial distraction (pullout) testing. During cycling, minimal micromotion was observed with an asymptotic decrease in differential motion between the first and last 50 cycles. Both cycled and uncycled groups demonstrated no statistical difference in average pullout force (4888±2124 N vs 4367±1154 N; P=.43). The percentage of cortical contact for each implant was determined from panoramic fluoroscopy images using digital image analysis software. Contact area for the distal third of the stem showed the highest correlation with pullout force and with predicting pullout force. Bone quality did not correlate with pullout force (r(2)=0.367) or stem contact area (r(2)=0.394). In sum, press-fit uncemented femoral stems did not loosen or demonstrate decreased pullout strength with early weight bearing simulated by cyclical axial compressive loading.

Constrained Implants in Total Knee Replacement

Total knee replacement (TKR) is a successful procedure for pain relief and functional restoration in patients with advanced osteoarthritis. The number of TKRs is increasing, and this has led to an increase in revision surgeries. The key to long-term success in both primary and revision TKR is stability, as well as adequate and stable fixation between components and underlying bone. In the vast majority of primary TKRs and in some revision cases, a posterior cruciate retaining or a posterior cruciate substituting device can be used. In some primary cases with severe deformity or ligamentous instability and in most of the revision cases, a more constrained implant is required. The purpose of this paper is to review the literature concerning the use of condylar constrained knee (CCK) and rotating hinge (RH) implants in primary and revision cases focusing on the indications and results. According to this review, although excellent and very good results have been reported, there are limitations of the existing literature concerning the indications for the use of constrained implants, the absence of long-term results, and the limited comparative studies.

Current status of cost utility analyses in total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Total joint arthroplasty (TJA), although considered to be highly beneficial, is associated with substantial costs to the US healthcare system. Cost utility analysis has become an increasingly important means to objectively evaluate the value of a healthcare intervention from the perspective of both extending the quantity and improving the quality of life. Relatively little is known about the overall cost utility analysis evidence base in TJA.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The goals of this review were to (1) determine the cost utility of TJA interventions; (2) critically assess the quality of published US-based cost utility analyses using the Quality of Health Economic Studies instrument; and (3) determine what characteristics were common among studies receiving a high quality score.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature using the MEDLINE database was performed to compile findings and critically appraise US-based cost utility analysis studies for total hip and knee arthroplasty. Based on review of 676 identified articles, 23 studies were included. We used the Quality of Health Economic Studies instrument to assess study quality and one-sided Fisher's exact tests were applied to analyze the predictors of high-quality cost utility analysis.

RESULTS

Very few studies compare the cost utility of TJA versus nonoperative intervention; however, the available evidence suggests that TJA can be cost-saving and is highly cost-effective compared with conservative management of end-stage arthritis. The majority of identified studies are focused on the cost utility of new implant technologies or comparisons among surgical alternatives. These studies suggest that the upfront costs associated with new technologies are cost-effective when there is a major reduction in a future cost. The quality of identified studies is quite high (Quality of Health Economic Studies Instrument score: mean 86.5; range, 63-100). National funding source (p = 0.095) and lifetime horizon for analysis (p = 0.07) correlate with high-quality evidence but do not reach significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Over the past 15 years, there has been a major increase in the volume of cost utility analyses published in total hip and knee arthroplasty. The quality of cost utility analyses published during that period is good. As increasing attention is paid to value in US health care, more attention should be paid to understanding the cost utility of TJA compared with nonoperative treatment modalities. Future studies may also look to incorporate patient willingness to pay.

[Interest of non invasive navigation in total knee arthroplasty]

During surgery of total knee arthroplasty, we use a computerized non invasive navigation (Brainlab Victor Vision CT-free) to assess the accuracy of the bone cuts (navigation expresse). The purpose of this study is to evaluate non invasive navigation when a total knee arthroplasty is achieved by conventional instrumentation. The study is based on forty total knee arthroplasties. The accuracy of the tibial and distal femoral bone cuts, checked by non invasive navigation, is evaluated prospectively. In our clinical series, we have obtained, with the conventional instrumentation, a correction of the mechanical axis only in 90 % of cases (N = 36). With non invasive navigation, we improved the positioning of implants and obtained in all cases the desired axiometry in the frontal plane. Although operative time is increased by about 15 minutes, the non invasive navigation does not induce intraoperative or immediate postoperative complications. Despite the cost of this technology, we believe that the reliability of the procedure is enhanced by a simple and reproducible technique.

High accuracy in knee alignment and implant placement in unicompartmental medial knee replacement when using patient-specific instrumentation

PURPOSE

The influence of patient-specific instrumentations on the accuracy of unicompartmental medial knee replacement remains unclear. The goal of this study was to examine the ability of patient-specific instrumentation to accurately reproduce postoperatively what the surgeon had planned preoperatively.

METHODS

Twenty consecutive patients (20 knees) who suffered from isolated unicompartmental medial osteoarthritis of the knee and underwent medial knee replacement using newly introduced magnetic resonance imaging-based patient-specific instrumentation were assessed. This assessment recorded the following parameters: (1) the planned and the postoperative mechanical axis acquired through long-leg AP view radiographies; (2) the planned and the postoperative tibial slope acquired by means of standard AP and lateral view radiographies; and (3) the postoperative fit of the implanted components to the bone in coronal and sagittal planes. The hypothesis of the study was that there was no statistically significant difference between postoperative results and preoperatively planned values.

RESULTS

The study showed that (1) the difference between the postoperative mechanical axis (mean 1.9° varus ± 1.2° SD) and the planned mechanical axis (mean 1.8° varus ± 1.2° SD) was not statistically significant; (2) the difference between the postoperative tibial slope (mean 5.2° ± 0.6° SD) and the planned tibial slope (mean 5.4° ± 0.6° SD) was statistically significant (p = 0.008); and (3) the postoperative component fit to bone in the coronal and sagittal planes was accurate in all cases; nevertheless, in one knee, all components were implanted one size smaller than preoperatively planned. Moreover, in two additional cases, one size thinner and one size thicker of the polyethylene insert were used.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that overall patient-specific instrumentation was highly accurate in reproducing postoperatively what the surgeon had planned preoperatively in terms of mechanical axis, tibial slope and component fit to bone.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Mid-term Results of Oxford Phase 3 Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties at a Small-Volume Center

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is considered as an alternative to total knee arthroplasty for patients who have osteoarthritis limited to the medial compartment of the knee. The aim of this retrospective study was to find out clinical and radiological outcomes and related complications using the Oxford phase 3 prosthesis at a small-volume center.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In all, 95 Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (87 patients) were performed between 2000 and 2010 in North Karelia Central Hospital. Of these, five patients had undergone revision surgery. In all, 52 unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (46 patients) participated in this study. The mean age of patients was 61.4 years, and 78.2% of patients were females. Pain and function levels were evaluated by using the Knee Society score. Radiographic analyses were performed on preoperative and postoperative and follow-up radiographs.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The mean follow-up time was 6.5 years, and the Kaplan-Meier estimated 9-year implant survival rate was 88.9% (95% confidence interval = 78.7%-99.1%). The median Knee Society score of 77 (range: 18-93) at follow-up was considered good (range: 70-79). In this study, we found out that medial knee pain remains in 10% of unicompartmental knee arthroplasties several years after surgery, although the reason for the pain remained unclear. These mid-term results are promising, and good results can be achieved also at a small-volume center when strict patient selection is followed.

Accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation compared with conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty

Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) has recently been introduced to improve the alignment following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, controversy remains between PSI and conventional instrumentation. The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy of PSI with conventional instruments for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A systematic literature search was performed in databases including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science. All of the available randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) or non-randomized, controlled trials (nRCTs) comparing PSI with conventional instruments for TKA were identified. A statistical analysis was performed of this meta-analysis. Eighteen studies with 2417 patients were included in the authors' final analysis. The results of the meta-analysis demonstrated that there were no statistical differences in outliers of the mechanical axis (risk ratio [RR], 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-1.11), the femoral component in the coronal (RR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.32-1.05) and sagittal (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.60-1.14) plane, the tibial component in the coronal (RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.52-1.35) and sagittal (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.69-1.55) plane, and the femoral component rotation (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.57, 1.83) between the 2 groups. In addition, subgroup analysis showed that the study design and imaging used for preoperative scanning did not affect the outcome of the alignment, but a different PSI system might. The authors' meta-analysis indicated that the accuracy of PSI was not superior to conventional instruments for patients undergoing TKA. Future RCTs should focus on functional outcomes and component survivorship with mid- to long-term follow-up.

Evaluation of anterior knee pain in a PS total knee arthroplasty: the role of patella-friendly femoral component and patellar size

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty gives excellent objective results. Nevertheless, the subjective findings do not match the normal knee perception: Often, it depends on patellar pain onset. In this study, we analyzed clinical and radiological items that can affect resurfaced patellar tracking, and role of a patella-friendly femoral component and patellar size on patellar pain onset.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty consecutive patients were implanted using the same-cemented posterior-stabilized TKA associated with patella resurfacing. Fifteen patients were implanted using a classical femoral component, while another 15 patients were implanted using a patella-friendly femoral component. The statistical analysis was set to detect a significant difference (p < 0.05) in clinical and radiological outcomes related to several surgical parameters. Clinical and functional outcomes were recorded using the Knee Society Scoring System (KSS) and patellar pain with the Burnett questionnaire.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 25 months. KSS results were excellent in both groups. Group 2 (patella-friendly femoral model) reached a higher percentage of 100 points in the clinical and functional KSS, but there was no statistical difference. Also, no statistical differences for Burnett Questionnaire results were recorded. We had one case of patellar clunk syndrome in the standard femoral component group and one poor result in the second group. Postoperative radiographic measurements evidenced no statistical differences in both groups. In group 1 (classical femoral component), better significant result (p < 0.05) war recorded at clinical evaluation according to the Knee Society Scoring System (KSS) in case of wider patellar component resurfaced.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study reveals no statistically significant difference in the incidence of anterior knee pain between classical and "patella-friendly" femoral components. With the particular type of implant design utilized in this study, when the classical femoral component is used, bigger patellar implant sizes (38 and 41 mm) showed superior clinical outcome.

Implant positioning in TKA: comparison between conventional and patient-specific instrumentation

The number of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures continuously increases, with good to excellent results. In the last few years, new surgical techniques have been developed to improve prosthesis positioning. In this context, patient-specific instrumentation is included. The goal of this study was to compare the perioperative parameters and the spatial positioning of prosthetic components in TKA procedures performed with patient-specific instrumentation vs traditional TKA. In this prospective comparative randomized study, 15 patients underwent TKA with 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) preoperative planning (patient-specific instrumentation group) and 15 patients underwent traditional TKA (non-patient-specific instrumentation group). All patients underwent postoperative computed tomography (CT) examination. In the patient-specific instrumentation group, preoperative data planning regarding femoral and tibial bone resection was correlated with intraoperative measurements. Surgical time, length of hospitalization, and intraoperative and postoperative bleeding were compared between the 2 groups. Positioning of implants on postoperative CT was assessed for both groups. Data planned with 3-dimensional MRI regarding the depth of bone cuts showed good to excellent correlation with intraoperative measurements. The patient-specific instrumentation group showed better perioperative outcomes and good correlation between the spatial positioning of prosthetic components planned preoperatively and that seen on postoperative CT. Less variability was found in the patient-specific instrumentation group than in the non-patient-specific instrumentation group in spatial orientation of prosthetic components. Preoperative planning with 3-dimensional MRI in TKA has a better perioperative outcome compared with the traditional method. Use of patient-specific instrumentation can also improve the spatial positioning of both prosthetic components.

Patient-matched instruments versus standard instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND

Optimal positioning of implants and restoration of neutral mechanical axis are two primary surgical goals in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Despite modern instruments and improved surgical techniques, malalignment remains an important cause of early failure after TKA. The aim of this prospective randomized study was to compare the value of a new patient-matched instrument system (PMI) (Signature(TM); Biomet, Inc, Warsaw, Indiana) to that of standard TKA surgical instrumentation (STD) in terms of coronal mechanical alignment, time of operation and blood loss.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 38 patients waiting for primary TKA were enrolled and randomized into two groups (19 PMI and 19 STD). Magnetic resonance imaging was performed in all patients in the PMI group, and specific instruments for the femur and tibia were designed preoperatively. All patients were operated on using the standard medial parapatellar approach with no use of tourniquet. Mechanical axis, time for the operation, and blood loss were evaluated.

RESULTS

Patients in both groups had comparable age, body mass index, preoperative mechanical axis, Knee Society Score, and level of hemoglobin. Postoperative results showed that the PMI group fell significantly closer to neutral mechanical axis (STD: 2.7 ± 1.7, PMI: 1.7 ± 0.9; P = 0.013) with no outliers and a reduced time for the operation. There was no difference in the evaluation blood loss.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of PMI can contribute in achieving better mechanical axis with reduction in outliers and decreased operation time. Due to small differences between PMI and standard instruments, additional research are needed to confirm these preliminary results, and to discover potential benefits and functional improvements in the long-term outcome.

Standard versus high-flexion posterior stabilized total knee prostheses

This meta-analysis compared clinical outcomes between standard and high-flexion posterior-stabilized total knee prostheses to evaluate which type of total knee prosthesis was superior. Randomized, controlled trials published until October 2013 comparing standard and high-flexion posterior-stabilized total knee prostheses were reviewed. Methodologic quality was assessed with the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale. After data extraction, the authors compared results with fixed effects or random effects models, depending on the heterogeneity of the included studies. Eight randomized, controlled trials involving 660 patients met the predetermined inclusion criteria. No statistically significant differences between patients undergoing standard and high-flexion posterior-stabilized total knee prostheses were noted in postoperative range of motion (ROM) (weighted mean difference, -1.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], -4.52 to 1.67; P=.37); flexion angle (weighted mean difference, 0.54; 95% CI, -3.75 to 4.84; P=.80); Knee Society Score (weighted mean difference, 0.92; 95% CI, -0.64 to 2.48; P=.25); Hospital for Special Surgery knee score (weighted mean difference, 0.57; 95% CI, -0.42 to 1.55; P=.26); or Knee Society function score (weighted mean difference, 1.00; 95% CI, -1.49 to 3.49; P=.43). No statistical difference was found between the 2 prosthesis types in complications, involving 21 cases in the standard group and 14 cases in the high-flexion group. The current findings confirm that high-flexion posterior-stabilized total knee prostheses are not superior to standard prostheses in terms of ROM, flexion angle, knee scores, or complications with 5 years or less of follow-up.

Patient-specific instrumentation does not improve accuracy in total knee arthroplasty

Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) has been introduced as a tool to increase the accuracy of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) compared with conventional instrumentation (CLI). However, previous studies have shown inconsistent results. The authors conducted a meta-analysis to compare the performance of PSI to CLI in TKA. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials electronic databases were systematically searched to identify eligible trials published between 2000 and March 2014. Two reviewers independently assessed methodological quality according to the Cochrane Handbook. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the different study designs (randomized, controlled trial [RCT] vs non-randomized, controlled trial [non-RCT]), preoperative magnetic resonance imaging vs computed tomography, and systems of PSI to explore the source of heterogeneity. Fourteen studies (7 RCTs and 7 non-RCTs) involving 1906 patients were included. There were no statistical differences with respect to the outliers of mechanical axis, coronal femoral component, sagittal femoral component, femoral component rotation, operative time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay between PSI and CLI groups. The number of outliers in coronal tibial components (odds ratio, 2.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.20 to 4.35; P=.01) and sagittal tibial components (odds ratio, 1.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.16 to 2.42; P<.01) was significantly lower in the CLI group than in the PSI group. Based on the numbers available, the use of PSI compared with CLI was not likely to improve the accuracy of component alignment and treatment effects of TKA. Further high-quality RCTs are warranted to confirm the authors' results.

The Effect of Adductor-Canal-Blockade on Outcome after Medial Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty: A Preliminary Study

INTRODUCTION

Unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) offers decreased morbidity, faster recovery, better functional outcomes, and equivalent survivorship compared to TKA for certain patients. To fully capture these benefits, regional anesthesia techniques must facilitate rather than compromise patients ability for early postoperative mobilization and safe discharge following UKA. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the predominantly sensory adductor canal blockade (ACB) shortens hospital stay after medial UKA (mUKA). Secondary endpoints were narcotic consumption, steps walked during PT sessions, and total PT sessions required prior to discharge.

METHODS

Twelve patients scheduled for elective mUKA received spinal anesthesia and single-shot ACB. ACB patients were matched by age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and Charlson Comorbidity Index in a 1:2 ratio to 24 lumbar plexus block (LPB) patients. Time to hospital discharge, number of physical therapy (PT) sessions required for safe discharge, and steps taken during PT sessions were retrospectively abstracted from each patient's medical record.

RESULTS

Patients who received ACB had a significantly shorter hospital stay (27.8 ± 3.9 hours) compared with patients who received LPB (39.7 ±18.5 hours, p = 0.025). Patients treated with ACB required significantly fewer PT sessions (1.3 ± 0.6 sessions) compared to patients who received LPB (2.4 ± 1.5 sessions, p = 0.007). Patients treated with ACB walked significantly more steps during their first PT session (225.0 ± 156.6 steps) compared with patients treated with LPB (107.4 ± 170.0, p = 0.045). There was a trend towards decreased narcotic requirements in the ACB group.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Data from our study suggests that ACB may permit earlier hospital discharge and better participation in PT without compromising the quality of perioperative analgesia. Thus, ACB may represent a promising option for patients undergoing mUKA in terms of improved clinical outcomes, decreased postoperative morbidity, and cost-effectiveness.

Mobile bearing vs fixed bearing prostheses for posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty for postoperative functional status in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether there are differences in benefits and harms between mobile and fixed prostheses for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The previous Cochrane review published in 2004 included two articles. Many more trials have been performed since then; therefore an update is needed.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of mobile bearing compared with fixed bearing cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty for functional and clinical outcomes in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and Web of Science up to 27 February 2014, and the trial registers ClinicalTrials.gov, Multiregister, Current Controlled Trials and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for data from unpublished trials, up to 11 February 2014. We also screened the reference lists of selected articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected randomised controlled trials comparing mobile bearing with fixed bearing prostheses in cruciate retaining TKA among patients with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis, using functional or clinical outcome measures and follow-up of at least six months.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures as expected by The Cochrane Collaboration.

MAIN RESULTS

We found 19 studies with 1641 participants (1616 with OA (98.5%) and 25 with RA (1.5%)) and 2247 knees. Seventeen new studies were included in this update.Quality of the evidence ranged from moderate (knee pain) to low (other outcomes). Most studies had unclear risk of bias for allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel, blinding of outcome assessment and selective reporting, and high risk of bias for incomplete outcome data and other bias. Knee painWe calculated the standardised mean difference (SMD) for pain, using the Knee Society Score (KSS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) in 11 studies (58%) and 1531 knees (68%). No statistically significant differences between groups were reported (SMD 0.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.03 to 0.22, P value 0.15). This represents an absolute risk difference of 2.4% points higher (95% CI 0.8% lower to 5.9% higher) on the KSS pain scale and a relative percent change of 0.22% (95% CI 0.07% lower to 0.53% higher). The results were homogeneous. Clinical and functional scores The KSS clinical score did not differ statistically significantly between groups (14 studies (74%) and 1845 knees (82%)) with a mean difference (MD) of -1.06 points (95% CI -2.87 to 0.74, P value 0.25) and heterogeneous results. KSS function was reported in 14 studies (74%) with 1845 knees (82%) as an MD of -0.10 point (95% CI -1.93 to 1.73, P value 0.91) and homogeneous results. In two studies (11%), the KSS total score was favourable for mobile bearing (159 vs 132 for fixed bearing), with MD of -26.52 points (95% CI -45.03 to -8.01, P value 0.005), but with a wide 95% confidence interval indicating uncertainty about the estimate.Other reported scoring systems did not show statistically significant differences: Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score (seven studies (37%) in 1021 knees (45%)) with an MD of -1.36 (95% CI -4.18 to 1.46, P value 0.35); Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) total score (two studies (11%), 167 knees (7%)) with an MD of -4.46 (95% CI -16.26 to 7.34, P value 0.46); and Oxford total (five studies (26%), 647 knees (29%) with an MD of -0.25 (95% CI -1.41 to 0.91, P value 0.67). Health-related quality of lifeThree studies (16%) with 498 knees (22%) reported on health-related quality of life, and no statistically significant differences were noted between the mobile bearing and fixed bearing groups. The Short Form (SF)-12 Physical Component Summary had an MD of -1.96 (95% CI -4.55 to 0.63, P value 0.14) and heterogeneous results. Revision surgeryTwenty seven revisions (1.3%) were performed in 17 studies (89%) with 2065 knees (92%). In all, 13 knees were revised in the fixed bearing group and 14 knees in the mobile bearing group. No statistically significant differences were found (risk difference 0.00, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.01, P value 0.58), and homogeneous results were reported. MortalityIn seven out of 19 studies, 13 participants (37%) died. Two of these participants had undergone bilateral surgery, and for seven participants, it was unclear which prosthesis they had received; therefore they were excluded from the analyses. Thus our analysis included four out of 191 participants (2.1%) who had died: one in the fixed bearing group and three in the mobile bearing group. No statistically significant differences were found. The risk difference was -0.02 (95% CI -0.06 to 0.03, P value 0.49) and results were homogeneous. Reoperation ratesThirty reoperations were performed in 17 studies (89%) with 2065 knees (92%): 18 knees in the fixed bearing group (of the 1031 knees) and 12 knees in the mobile group (of the 1034 knees). No statistically significant differences were found. The risk difference was -0.01 (95% CI -0.01 to 0.01, P value 0.99) with homogeneous results. Other serious adverse eventsSixteen studies (84%) reported nine other serious adverse events in 1735 knees (77%): four in the fixed bearing group (of the 862 knees) and five in the mobile bearing group (of the 873 knees). No statistically significant differences were found (risk difference 0.00, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.01, P value 0.88), and results were homogeneous.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Moderate- to low-quality evidence suggests that mobile bearing prostheses may have similar effects on knee pain, clinical and functional scores, health-related quality of life, revision surgery, mortality, reoperation rate and other serious adverse events compared with fixed bearing prostheses in posterior cruciate retaining TKA. Therefore we cannot draw firm conclusions. Most (98.5%) participants had OA, so the findings primarily reflect results reported in participants with OA. Future studies should report in greater detail outcomes such as those presented in this systematic review, with sufficient follow-up time to allow gathering of high-quality evidence and to inform clinical practice. Large registry-based studies may have added value, but they are subject to treatment-by-indication bias. Therefore, this systematic review of RCTs can be viewed as the best available evidence.

Effectiveness of Gentamicin-Impregnated Cement in the Prevention of Deep Wound Infection After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

Effectiveness of gentamicin-impregnated cement in preventing deep wound infection after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was estimated using data from prospective surveillance. In multivariate analysis, the protective effect of gentamicin-impregnated cement on the development of infection was close to the limit of significance. Gentamicin-impregnated cement may prevent TKA infections.

High-flexion posterior-substituting versus cruciate-retaining prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty: functional outcome, range of motion and complication comparison

PURPOSE

Currently, a high-flexion cruciate-retaining knee prosthesis has been designed to allow greater advantage after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The present study was conducted to compare functional outcome, range of motion (ROM) as well as complications in subjects who underwent either a high-flexion cruciate-retaining (HFCR, Group I) or a high-flexion posterior-substituting (HFPS, Group II) prosthesis TKA.

METHODS

Thirty-four subjects which had TKA with HFCR prosthesis and thirty-three subjects which had TKA with HFPS prosthesis were enrolled in our study and were assessed preoperatively and at 24 months postoperatively. For functional outcome comparison, Hospital for Special Surgery Score (HSSS), Knee Society Score (KSS, including the Mean Knee Score and the Mean Function Score) as well as SF12 Score (including Mental Health Score and Physical Health Score) were measured. For ROM comparison, the arcs of maximal non-weight-bearing passive flexion and weight-bearing flexion were detected, and the number of knees which allowed patients to kneel and sit cross-legged in comfort was determined. For complication comparison, wound necrosis/discharge, anterior knee pain, dislocation, radiolucent lines as well as osteolysis were investigated.

RESULTS

At 24-month follow-up, no significant difference in functional outcome between the two groups was detected. The average maximal non-weight-bearing flexion was 136.2° for the knees in Group I and 135.1° for the knees in Group II (P > 0.05). The average weight-bearing flexion was 123.2° for the knees in Group I and 129.8° for the knees in Group II (P > 0.05). No significant difference, with regard to the number of knees that allowed kneeling and sitting cross-legged, was detected. Comparisons of postoperative complications between the two groups did not yield a significant difference.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated no advantage of the high-flexion cruciate- retaining TKA over high-flexion posterior-substituting TKA with regard to functional outcome, range of motion as well as complications at short-term follow-up. However, longer follow-up is necessary to confirm whether these results are sustained.

Does operative time affect infection rate in primary total knee arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

Prolonged operative time may increase the risk of infection after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Both surgeon-related and patient-related factors can contribute to increased operative times.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The purpose of this study was to determine (1) whether increased operative time is an independent risk factor for revision resulting from infection after TKA; (2) whether increasing body mass index (BMI) increased operative time; and (3) whether increasing experience substantially decreased operative time.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated primary TKAs from our joint registry between March 2000 and August 2012. Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the relationship between operative time and revision resulting from infection after accounting for age, sex, BMI, and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality comorbidity score. Of 9973 instances of primary TKA, 73 underwent revision surgery for infection (0.73%).

RESULTS

After accounting for the confounders of age and sex, operative time was not found to have a significant effect; a 15-minute increase in operative time increased the hazard of revision resulting from infection by only 15.6% (p=0.053; 95% confidence interval, 0.0%-34.0%). In addition, a five-unit increase in BMI was found to increase mean operative time by 1.9 minutes, on average, regardless of sex (p<0.0001). Operative time decreases with increasing experience but appears to plateau at approximately 300 surgeries.

CONCLUSIONS

Operative time is only one of many factors that may increase infection risk and may be influenced by numerous confounders. Increasing BMI increased operative time but the effect was modest. The effect of increasing experience on operative duration of this common procedure was surprisingly limited among our surgeons.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Systematic review of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: new but not improved

BACKGROUND

Patient-specific cutting blocks have been touted as a more efficient and reliable means of achieving neutral mechanical alignment during TKA with the proposed downstream effect of improved clinical outcomes. However, it is not clear to what degree published studies support these assumptions.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We asked: (1) Do patient-specific cutting blocks achieve neutral mechanical alignment more reliably during TKA when compared with conventional methods? (2) Does patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) provide financial benefit through improved surgical efficiency? (3) Does the use of patient-specific cutting blocks translate to improved clinical results after TKA when compared with conventional instrumentation?

METHODS

We performed a systematic review in accordance with Cochrane guidelines of controlled studies (prospective and retrospective) in MEDLINE® and EMBASE® with respect to patient-specific cutting blocks and their effect on alignment, cost, operative time, clinical outcome scores, complications, and survivorship. Sixteen studies (Level I-III on the levels of evidence rubric) were identified and used in addressing the first question, 13 (Level I-III) for the second question, and two (Level III) for the third question. Qualitative assessment of the selected Level I studies was performed using the modified Jadad score; Level II and III studies were rated based on the Newcastle-Ottawa scoring system.

RESULTS

The majority of studies did not show an improvement in overall limb alignment when PSI was compared with standard instrumentation. Mixed results were seen across studies with regard to the prevalence of alignment outliers when PSI was compared with conventional cutting blocks with some studies demonstrating no difference, some showing an improvement with PSI, and a single study showing worse results with PSI. The studies demonstrated mixed results regarding the influence of PSI on operative times. Decreased operative times were not uniformly observed, and when noted, they were found to be of minimal clinical or financial significance. PSI did reliably reduce the number of instrument trays required for processing perioperatively. The accuracy of the preoperative plan, generated by the PSI manufacturers, was found lacking, often leading to multiple intraoperative changes, thereby disrupting the flow of the operation and negatively impacting efficiency. Limited data exist with regard to the effect of PSI on postoperative function, improvement in pain, and patient satisfaction. Neither of the two studies we identified provided strong evidence to support an advantage favoring the use of PSI. No identified studies addressed survivorship of components placed with PSI compared with those placed with standard instrumentation.

CONCLUSIONS

PSI for TKA has not reliably demonstrated improvement of postoperative limb or component alignment when compared with standard instrumentation. Although decisive evidence exists to support that PSI requires fewer surgical trays, PSI has not clearly been shown to improve overall surgical efficiency or the cost-effectiveness of TKA. Mid- and long-term data regarding PSI's effect on functional outcomes and component survivorship do not exist and short-term data are scarce. Limited available literature does not clearly support any improvement of postoperative pain, activity, function, or ROM when PSI is compared with traditional instrumentation.

Design comparison: manipulation after total knee arthroplasty

Postoperative stiffness is a relatively uncommon issue in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, it can be a debilitating complication when it occurs. Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is commonly used as the primary treatment modality following failed physiotherapy. The Advance medial pivot knee (Wright Medical Technology) was created in an effort to prevent stiffness postoperatively and increase range of motion. The Evolution medial pivot knee is a second-generation design that builds on the technology of the Advance knee. This article presents a retrospective review of prospectively collected data on 881 primary medial pivot knees (592 Advance knees, 289 Evolution knees). It was theorized that the design changes made to the Evolution knees might contribute toward reducing the need for MUA. It was found that the Evolution knees required significantly fewer manipulations under anesthesia (p = .036). The design modifications made to the Evolution knees may have contributed to the lower rate of MUA.

The risk of revision after TKA is affected by previous HTO or UKA

BACKGROUND

High tibial osteotomy (HTO) and unicompartmental arthroplasty (UKA) are reconstructive surgeries advocated for younger patients. In case of failure or progression of osteoarthritis, they can both be converted to a total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We used registry data to answer if the risks of revision for TKAs after previous HTOs and UKAs differ and how these compare with that of de novo TKAs. Furthermore, we wanted to examine the extent of stemmed/revision implants being used for the conversions.

METHODS

We identified HTOs performed during 1998 to 2007 with the help of the inpatient and outpatient care registries of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare and gathered relevant information from hospital records. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register was then examined to find all de novo TKAs, TKAs performed after HTO, and TKAs performed after UKA through the end of 2012.

RESULTS

For 920 TKAs after previous UKA and 356 TKAs after previous closed-wedge HTOs, we found the risk of revision significantly higher than for the 118,229 de novo TKAs (risk ratio, 2.8; confidence interval [CI], 2.2-3.5; p<0.001, and 1.7 CI, 1.1-2.6; p<0.001, respectively), whereas for the 482 open-wedge osteotomies, the difference was not significant (risk ratio, 1.2; CI, 0.8-1.8; p=0.44). Stemmed implants were used in 663 of the 117,566 primary de novo TKAs (0.6%), in 22 of the 809 HTO conversions (4%) and in 136 of the 920 UKA conversions (17%).

CONCLUSIONS

TKAs after previous reconstructive surgery carry an increased risk for revision. However, our findings do not mitigate against the use of UKA and HTO in selected cases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.