Reassessment of the role of induction chemotherapy for head and neck cancer

Head and neck cancers are a complex group of diseases defined by variations in histological features, anatomical location, and cause. Once the realm of surgeons and radiation oncologists, the treatment of locally advanced disease now involves medical oncologists. Major developments include primary chemoradiotherapy for unresectable disease and organ preservation, the addition of chemotherapy to adjuvant radiotherapy, improvement in surgical and radiation techniques, and biological therapies. Concomitant chemoradiotherapy consistently improves locoregional control. However, control of distant metastases is poor, resulting in an increasing proportion of deaths from systemic recurrence. Given this shift in site of recurrence, therapeutic strategies to suppress distant metastases may be the next goal for further improvement of survival. One approach that merits reassessment is the use of induction chemotherapy in the setting of locally advanced disease--both resectable and unresectable. In this review we summarise data for the use of induction chemotherapy to define better which patients will likely benefit from this approach now and which questions are important in the design of future clinical trials.

American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline for the Use of Larynx-Preservation Strategies in the Treatment of Laryngeal Cancer

Purpose

To develop a clinical practice guideline for treatment of laryngeal cancer with the intent of preserving the larynx (either the organ itself or its function). This guideline is intended for use by oncologists in the care of patients outside of clinical trials.

Methods

A multidisciplinary Expert Panel determined the clinical management questions to be addressed and reviewed the literature available through November 2005, with emphasis given to randomized controlled trials of site-specific disease. Survival, rate of larynx preservation, and toxicities were the principal outcomes assessed. The guideline underwent internal review and approval by the Panel, as well as external review by additional experts, members of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Health Services Committee, and the ASCO Board of Directors.

Results

Evidence supports the use of larynx-preservation approaches for appropriately selected patients without a compromise in survival; however, no larynx-preservation approach offers a survival advantage compared with total laryngectomy and adjuvant therapy with rehabilitation as indicated.

Recommendations

All patients with T1 or T2 laryngeal cancer, with rare exception, should be treated initially with intent to preserve the larynx. For most patients with T3 or T4 disease without tumor invasion through cartilage into soft tissues, a larynx-preservation approach is an appropriate, standard treatment option, and concurrent chemoradiotherapy therapy is the most widely applicable approach. To ensure an optimum outcome, special expertise and a multidisciplinary team are necessary, and the team should fully discuss with the patient the advantages and disadvantages of larynx-preservation options compared with treatments that include total laryngectomy.

Phase II trial of taxol in salivary gland malignancies (E1394): A trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

BACKGROUND

Malignant tumors of the salivary glands make up approximately 5% of head and neck cancers. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) initiated a phase II evaluation of paclitaxel in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic salivary gland malignancies.

METHODS

Chemo-naive patients with histologically confirmed recurrent or metastatic carcinoma of salivary gland origin (mucoepidermoid, adenocarcinoma, or adenoid cystic) were eligible. Patients were treated with paclitaxel, 200 mg/m(2) IV, every 21 days for a minimum of four cycles.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were treated. Eight partial responses were seen among the 31 patients with mucoepidermoid or adenocarcinoma histologic findings for a response rate of 26%. No responses were seen in the adenoid cystic carcinoma group. No significant difference in overall survival was found among these three histologic subgroups.

CONCLUSION

Paclitaxel demonstrates moderate activity in salivary gland tumors of mucoepidermoid and adenocarcinoma histology. The poor response rate in adenoid cystic carcinoma is consistent with prior reports in this chemoresistant histologic subtype.

Phase III randomized trial of cisplatin plus placebo compared with cisplatin plus cetuximab in metastatic/recurrent head and neck cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study

PURPOSE

Therapy of recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck results in median progression-free survival (PFS) of 2 months. These cancers are rich in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). We wished to determine whether the addition of cetuximab, which inhibits activation of EGFR, would improve PFS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were randomly assigned to receive cisplatin every 4 weeks, with weekly cetuximab (arm A) or placebo (arm B). Tumor tissue was assayed for EGFR expression by immunohistochemistry. The primary end point was PFS. Secondary end points of interest were response rate, toxicity, overall survival, and correlation of EGFR with clinical end points.

RESULTS

There were 117 analyzable patients enrolled. Median PFS was 2.7 months for arm B and 4.2 months for arm A. The hazard ratio for progression of arm A to arm B was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.54 to 1.12). Median overall survival was 8.0 months for arm B and 9.2 months for arm A (P = .21). The hazard ratio for survival by skin toxicity in cetuximab-treated patients was 0.42 (95% CI, 0.21 to 0.86). Objective response rate was 26% [corrected] for arm A and 10% [corrected] for arm B (P = .03). Enhancement of response was greater for patients with EGFR staining present in less than 80% of cells.

CONCLUSION

Addition of cetuximab to cisplatin significantly improves response rate. There was a survival advantage for the development of rash. Progression-free and overall survival were not significantly improved by the addition of cetuximab in this study.

Concordant loss of MTAP and p16/CDKN2A expression in gastroesophageal carcinogenesis: evidence of homozygous deletion in esophageal noninvasive precursor lesions and therapeutic implications

The gene that encodes methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP), an enzyme involved in adenine and methionine salvage pathways, is located on chromosome 9p21 telomeric to the p16INK4A/CDKN2A tumor suppressor gene. Inactivation of the p16INK4A/CDKN2A gene occurs by three different mechanisms: hypermethylation of the gene promoter, intragenic mutation coupled with loss of the second allele, and homozygous deletion. Immunohistochemical labeling for the p16INK4A/CDKN2A gene product parallels gene status but does not elucidate the mechanism of gene inactivation. Since the MTAP gene is often co-deleted with p16INK4A/CDKN2A, concurrent immunolabeling for both proteins can identify cases with homozygous p16INK4A/CDKN2A gene deletion. MTAP loss itself has therapeutic implications since it may confer selective sensitivity to inhibitors of de novo purine biosynthesis, such as L-alanosine. Twelve tissue microarrays were constructed from 92 cases of Barrett-associated adenocarcinomas and precursor lesions and 112 cases of gastric adenocarcinoma and precursor lesions comprising 1161 individual cores. Multiple cores were arrayed from any given case, and when available, included the entire histologic spectrum of intestinal metaplasia-dysplasia-carcinoma. Tissue microarrays were labeled with monoclonal antibodies against MTAP protein (clone 6.9, Salmedix, Inc) and p16 (clone 16P07, Neomarkers). Complete loss of labeling was considered negative, while any labeling (p16: nuclear; MTAP: cytoplasmic and nuclear) was considered positive. Loss of MTAP labeling occurred exclusively in conjunction with loss of p16 labeling, confirming that the previous findings from this group that concurrent loss of MTAP and p16 labeling is a surrogate marker of 9p21 homozygous deletions. Complete loss of MTAP and p16 was seen in 4 of 25 (16%) patients with Barrett's esophagus, 4 of 18 (22%) with low-grade dysplasia, 5 of 39 (13%) with high-grade dysplasia, 17 of 78 (22%) with invasive adenocarcinoma, and 8 of 36 (22%) of metastases. There were 7 cases of esophageal adenocarcinoma with loss of both MTAP and p16 for which precursor lesions were available. In 6 on these 7 cases (85%), the precursor lesion(s) had loss of both MTAP and p16. Lack of MTAP and p16 expression was seen in 11 of 106 (10%) cases of gastric adenocarcinoma. All metaplastic (30 biopsies from 20 cases) and dysplastic (15 biopsies from 13 cases) gastric tissues had both intact MTAP and p16INK4A/CDKN2A gene products. No precursor lesions were available from the gastric cancers that had loss of both MTAP and p16. Two benign gastric hyperplastic polyps also had intact p16 and MTAP. Concurrent MTAP and p16 loss detected by immunohistochemistry can serve as a convenient surrogate for p16INK4A/CDKN2A gene homozygous deletion in archival tissues. Inactivation of p16INK4A/CDKN2A by homozygous deletion appears to be an early event in Barrett carcinogenesis, occurring in noninvasive precursor lesions, including nondysplastic Barrett mucosa, in subsets of cases. In the absence of MTAP, cells depend exclusively on the de novo synthesis pathway for production of adenosine. This loss of MTAP during 9p21 homozygous deletion might be exploited therapeutically using de novo purine synthesis antimetabolites to treat a subset of invasive gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas and esophageal precursor lesions.

Neck Dissection followed by Radiotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy for Small Primary Oropharynx Carcinoma with Cervical Metastasis

OBJECTIVES

A cohort of patients with small primary (T1-T2) squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx and advanced cervical nodal metastasis were treated with initial neck dissection(s) followed by definitive radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy. Our rationale for this algorithm and our results are examined.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

METHODS

Pathology records and medical records from 1996 to 2003 from the Johns Hopkins Hospital were examined for patients meeting the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients meeting the inclusion criteria were identified. Follow-up periods ranged from 6 to 75 months. Mean and median follow-up periods were 38 and 33 months, respectively. One (6.25%) patient developed a metastasis and was alive with disease at last follow-up. Fifteen (93.75%) patients were alive without evidence of disease at last follow-up. Overall survival was 100%. Disease free survival was 93.75%.

CONCLUSION

Initial neck dissection followed by primary radiation therapy to the primary site and neck with or without chemotherapy is an effective therapy for small primary oropharynx cancers with N2 or greater cervical metastases.

Randomized phase III evaluation of cisplatin plus fluorouracil versus cisplatin plus paclitaxel in advanced head and neck cancer (E1395): an intergroup trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

PURPOSE

To determine the response rate, survival and toxicity of infusional cisplatin plus fluorouracil (CF) versus cisplatin plus paclitaxel (CP) in patients with incurable squamous cell cancer of the head and neck, with the hypothesis that CP is superior.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred eighteen patients with locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic disease were randomly assigned to CF (cisplatin 100 mg/m2 day 1 and fluorouracil 1,000 mg/m2/24 hours by continuous intravenous infusion day 1 through 4) or CP (cisplatin 75 mg/m2 day 1 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 over 3 hours on day 1). Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks until progression or a minimum of 6 cycles with complete response or stable disease. The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included response rate and toxicity.

RESULTS

No significant difference in overall survival or response rate was seen. Estimated median survival was 8.7 months in the CF group and 8.1 month in the CP group. Objective response rate (complete response plus partial response) was 27% in the CF group and 26% in the CP group. Toxicity was similar between groups, with the most frequent including myelosuppression, thrombocytopenia, anemia, nausea, vomiting, and stomatitis. A total of 12 deaths occurred (CF, seven; CP, five) during treatment; eight from infection, two from hemorrhage, one from cardiac causes and one from unknown causes. Gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicities were more common in the CF group, whereas neurotoxicity was equivalent between groups.

CONCLUSION

This phase III, randomized, multicenter trial showed no difference in survival between patients treated with CF or CP.

Head and Neck Cancers Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

The NCCN Head and Neck Cancers guidelines address tumors arising in the lip, oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, glottic and supraglottic larynx, paranasal (ethmoid and maxillary) sinuses, nasopharynx, and salivary glands, as well as occult primary cancer. Approximately 39,250 new cases of oral cavity, pharyngeal, and laryngeal cancers will occur in 2005, which accounts for about 3% of new cancer cases in the United States. An estimated 11,090 deaths from head and neck (H&N) cancers will occur in 2005. Alcohol and tobacco abuse are common etiologic factors in cancers of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx. Moreover, because the entire aerodigestive tract epithelium may be exposed to these carcinogens, patients with H&N cancer are at risk for developing second primary neoplasms of the H&N, lung, and esophagus.

For the most recent version of the guidelines, please visit NCCN.org

Phase II evaluation of 96-hour paclitaxel infusion in advanced (recurrent or metastatic) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (E3395): a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

BACKGROUND

Paclitaxel (24-hour infusion) has yielded activity in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Protracted exposure to paclitaxel may overcome resistance observed by using shorter infusions. Therefore we sought to evaluate paclitaxel by 96-hour infusion in both treatment-naïve and previously treated patients with SCCHN.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eligibility stipulated bi-dimensionally measurable, biopsy-documented, incurable SCCHN, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) 0-1, and adequate physiological indices. Patients were divided into three cohorts: 1) chemotherapy-naïve; 2) chemotherapy-exposed, paclitaxel-naïve; and 3) chemotherapy and paclitaxel exposed. Paclitaxel was dosed at 140 mg/m2 (96-hour infusion) every 3 weeks in treatment-naïve patients and at 120 mg/m2 (96 hours) every 3 weeks in previously treated patients.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were accrued between February 1997 and July 2000. The study was terminated because of low response rate. Eighty percent of patients were male, 75% PS 1. Nearly half the patients had oropharyngeal or hypopharyngeal primary sites. There was one treatment-related death due to neutropenic fever/pneumonia. Grade 4 toxicities included granulocytopenia in eight patients (20%), thrombocytopenia, and stomatitis in one patient each. Grade 3 or greater anemia occurred in 10 patients. There was no grade 2 or 3 peripheral sensory neuropathy. In 15 chemotherapy-naïve patients, two responses (13%) were observed. There were no responses in treatment-exposed patients. The overall median survival was 5.5 months, and 1-year survival rate 10%. Treatment-naïve patients had a median survival of 8.2 months and 1-year survival rate of 20%.

CONCLUSIONS

Paclitaxel by 96-hour infusion at a dose of 120-140 mg/m2/96 hours is only marginally active in the treatment of SCCHN. This dose and schedule cannot be recommended for further evaluation.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for resected adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, gastro-esophageal junction, and cardia: phase II trial (E8296) of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of postoperative paclitaxel and cisplatin on 2-year survival in patients with completely resected adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus, gastro-esophageal (GE) junction, and cardia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a multicenter phase II trial. Patients had pathologically staged T2 node-positive to T3-4, any node status adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus, GE junction, or gastric cardia with negative margins (R0). Treatment consisted of four cycles of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) over 3 hours followed by cisplatin 75 mg/m2 i.v. every 21 days. A positive outcome was considered to be an improvement in 2-year survival rate by > or = 20% compared to historic controls.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients were recruited from 20 centers. Of 55 eligible patients, 49 (89%) had lymph node involvement. Forty-six patients (84%) completed all four cycles. Of the total 59 patients, 31 (56%) developed grade 3 or 4 toxicity with leukopenia/neutropenia, nausea/vomiting, and metabolic toxicities were most common. The median follow-up for surviving patients was 4 years. At 2 years, 33 patients were alive and 22 were dead, with a survival rate of 60% (95% CI, 46% to 73%; one-sided P = .0008 compared with the historic controls).

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that adjuvant paclitaxel and cisplatin may improve survival in R0 resected patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus, GE junction, and cardia. These results warrant further testing in randomized trials.

Preliminary results of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 97-03: a randomized phase ii trial of concurrent radiation and chemotherapy for advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck

PURPOSE

To define further the role of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for patients with advanced squamous carcinoma of the head and neck.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group developed this three-arm randomized phase II trial. Patients with stage III or IV squamous carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, or hypopharynx were eligible. Each of three arms proposed a radiation schedule of 70 Gy in 35 fractions. Patients on arm 1 were to receive cisplatin 10 mg/m(2) daily and fluorouracil (FU) 400 mg/m(2) continuous infusion (CI) daily for the final 10 days of treatment. Treatment on arm 2 consisted of hydroxyurea 1 g every 12 hours and FU 800 mg/m(2)/d CI delivered with each fraction of radiation. Arm 3 patients were to receive weekly paclitaxel 30 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 20 mg/m(2). Patients randomly assigned to arms 1 and 3 were to receive their treatments every week; patients on arm 2 were to receive their therapy every other week.

RESULTS

Between 1997 and 1999, 241 patients were entered onto study; 231 were analyzable. Ninety-two percent, 79%, and 83% of patients on arms 1, 2, and 3, respectively, were able to complete their radiation as planned or with an acceptable variation. Fewer than 10% of patients had unacceptable deviations or incomplete chemotherapy in the three arms. Estimated 2-year disease-free and overall survival rates were 38.2% and 57.4% for arm 1, 48.6% and 69.4% for arm 2, and 51.3% and 66.6% for arm 3.

CONCLUSION

We have demonstrated that three different approaches of concurrent multiagent chemotherapy and radiation were feasible and could be delivered to patients in a multi-institutional setting with high compliance rates.

Postoperative concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy for high-risk squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND

Despite the use of resection and postoperative radiotherapy, high-risk squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck frequently recurs in the original tumor bed. We tested the hypothesis that concurrent postoperative administration of cisplatin and radiotherapy would improve the rate of local and regional control.

METHODS

Between September 9, 1995, and April 28, 2000, 459 patients were enrolled. After undergoing total resection of all visible and palpable disease, 231 patients were randomly assigned to receive radiotherapy alone (60 to 66 Gy in 30 to 33 fractions over a period of 6 to 6.6 weeks) and 228 patients to receive the identical treatment plus concurrent cisplatin (100 mg per square meter of body-surface area intravenously on days 1, 22, and 43).

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 45.9 months, the rate of local and regional control was significantly higher in the combined-therapy group than in the group given radiotherapy alone (hazard ratio for local or regional recurrence, 0.61; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.41 to 0.91; P=0.01). The estimated two-year rate of local and regional control was 82 percent in the combined-therapy group, as compared with 72 percent in the radiotherapy group. Disease-free survival was significantly longer in the combined-therapy group than in the radiotherapy group (hazard ratio for disease or death, 0.78; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.61 to 0.99; P=0.04), but overall survival was not (hazard ratio for death, 0.84; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.65 to 1.09; P=0.19). The incidence of acute adverse effects of grade 3 or greater was 34 percent in the radiotherapy group and 77 percent in the combined-therapy group (P<0.001). Four patients who received combined therapy died as a direct result of the treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Among high-risk patients with resected head and neck cancer, concurrent postoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy significantly improve the rates of local and regional control and disease-free survival. However, the combined treatment is associated with a substantial increase in adverse effects.

Multidisciplinary approaches in the management of advanced head and neck tumors: state of the art

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Head and neck cancer remains a significant cause of morbidity worldwide, with approximately 400,000 new cases per year. Ongoing advances in multidisciplinary management of this complex and multivaried disease process are resulting in improved function, quality of life, and survival. This review presents selected advances in primary research in head and neck cancer during the year 2003.

RECENT FINDINGS

Successful management of head and neck cancer now requires a cooperative approach among a broad group of medical disciplines that includes head and neck surgery, radiation oncology, medical oncology, medical imaging, clinical pathology and lab medicine, social work, nutrition, and others. Translation of continued advances in these fields by cooperative work will continue to yield incremental advances in diagnosis, staging, treatment, follow-up, supportive care, and quality of life. Accordingly, this review aims to include facets of each individual field. Diagnosis and staging continue to evolve with the inclusion of nuclear medicine and in vivo molecular imaging based on the technology of positron emission tomography and single photon emission computed tomographic scanning. Multimodality approaches remain the forefront of intervention for patients with advanced disease. Facets that continue to be defined and studied include the best treatment order of the three disciplines of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy; the refinement of radiation by altering fraction dose, sequence, and time course; radiosensitization by chemo- and biologic therapy; and the addition of novel, biologically targeted agents to these disciplines. Following from the side effects of these intensive treatments to a functionally critical part of the body are ongoing advances in supportive care and quality of life.

SUMMARY

Head and neck cancer represents a collection of diseases that, although seemingly united by location and histology, on closer inspection represent a diverse collection of subcategories that often differ in pathogenesis, tumor biology, sublocation within the head and neck region, diagnosis, prognosis, treatment, and effect on quality of life. Given this complexity, it is not surprising that clinical management is also complicated and requires a cooperative effort among multiple subspecialties. This review of the current standard of care for patients with head and neck cancer aims to assist this diverse group of practitioners in caring for this complex group of patients.

Organ preservation for cancer of the larynx: current indications and future directions

The optimal regimen for organ preservation for laryngeal cancer remains an area of active investigation. Multiple organ-preservation strategies have been explored, including radiation therapy alone, induction chemotherapy followed by radiation therapy, and concomitant chemoradiotherapy. Until recently, induction chemotherapy followed by radiation therapy was the standard of care for organ preservation in the United States. However, recent data from the Intergroup Trial, R 91-11 has placed concomitant chemoradiotherapy in the forefront as the standard of care for organ preservation. Newer strategies are being investigated and include the use of induction chemotherapy before concomitant chemoradiotherapy and the integration of novel biological agents. It remains to be seen whether such interventions can improve on the excellent locoregional control shown in the landmark Intergroup trial.

Outcome of elderly patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcome of elderly patients with head and neck cancer undergoing palliative chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed combined data from two mature phase III randomized trials conducted by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG; trial E1393, which compared cisplatin plus paclitaxel at two dose levels, and trial E1395, which compared cisplatin plus fluorouracil to cisplatin plus paclitaxel) to evaluate the toxicity, objective response rates, and survival of patients 70 years or older versus their younger counterparts. All patients had previously untreated recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck and ECOG performance status 0 or 1.

RESULTS

Fifty-three elderly patients were enrolled from a total of 399 eligible participants (13%). Elderly patients had similar objective response rates (28% v 33%) and median time to progression (5.25 v 4.8 months) compared with younger patients. The median survival was 5.3 v 8 months (Wilcoxon P =.06; log-rank P =.17) and the 1-year survival 26% v 33% for elderly and younger patients, respectively. Elderly patients had a significantly higher incidence of severe nephrotoxicity, diarrhea, and thrombocytopenia. A higher rate of toxic deaths was noted in the elderly but did not reach statistical significance (13% v 8%; P =.29).

CONCLUSION

Elderly patients were underrepresented in these studies. Fit elderly patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer sustained increased toxicities with cisplatin-based doublets but had comparable survival outcomes compared with younger patients. Strategies to ameliorate toxicities should be pursued in the elderly.

Concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy for organ preservation in advanced laryngeal cancer

BACKGROUND

Induction chemotherapy with cisplatin plus fluorouracil followed by radiotherapy is the standard alternative to total laryngectomy for patients with locally advanced laryngeal cancer. The value of adding chemotherapy to radiotherapy and the optimal timing of chemotherapy are unknown.

METHODS

We randomly assigned patients with locally advanced cancer of the larynx to one of three treatments: induction cisplatin plus fluorouracil followed by radiotherapy, radiotherapy with concurrent administration of cisplatin, or radiotherapy alone. The primary end point was preservation of the larynx.

RESULTS

A total of 547 patients were randomly assigned to one of the three study groups. The median follow-up period was 3.8 years. At two years, the proportion of patients who had an intact larynx after radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin (88 percent) differed significantly from the proportions in the groups given induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy (75 percent, P=0.005) or radiotherapy alone (70 percent, P<0.001). The rate of locoregional control was also significantly better with radiotherapy and concurrent cisplatin (78 percent, vs. 61 percent with induction cisplatin plus fluorouracil followed by radiotherapy and 56 percent with radiotherapy alone). Both of the chemotherapy-based regimens suppressed distant metastases and resulted in better disease-free survival than radiotherapy alone. However, overall survival rates were similar in all three groups. The rate of high-grade toxic effects was greater with the chemotherapy-based regimens (81 percent with induction cisplatin plus fluorouracil followed by radiotherapy and 82 percent with radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin, vs. 61 percent with radiotherapy alone). The mucosal toxicity of concurrent radiotherapy and cisplatin was nearly twice as frequent as the mucosal toxicity of the other two treatments during radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with laryngeal cancer, radiotherapy with concurrent administration of cisplatin is superior to induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy or radiotherapy alone for laryngeal preservation and locoregional control.

Chemoprevention for Barrett's esophagus trial. Design and outcome measures

Barrett's esophagus is a premalignant condition in which normal squamous epithelium of the esophagus is replaced by metaplastic columnar epithelium. It is a known risk factor for the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma. With the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma rising, it is reasonable to study Barrett's esophagus as a potential target for therapy that may prevent, delay and/or reverse ongoing tumorigenic processes. Epidemiologic and animal studies support the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the chemoprevention of several cancers, including esophageal cancer. Cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors are a new class of NSAIDs that inhibit prostaglandin synthesis by selectively blocking the COX-2 enzyme. The COX-2 enzyme has been reported to be over-expressed in premalignant and malignant states, including in Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma. The Chemoprevention for Barrett's Esophagus Trial (CBET) is a phase IIb, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled study of the selective COX-2 inhibitor, celecoxib, in patients with Barrett's dysplasia. The sample size is 200 patients with high or low grade Barrett's dysplasia. Celecoxib is administered orally, 200 mg twice per day; the dosing schedule for placebo is the same. Randomization is stratified by dysplasia grade and by clinic. Endoscopy with biopsies is performed at specified time intervals according to the highest grade of dysplasia determined at randomization. The primary outcome measure is the change from baseline to 1 year in the proportion of biopsies exhibiting dysplasia. Secondary outcomes include change from baseline in the maximal grade, extent and surface area of dysplasia. Tertiary outcomes will include measurements of various relevant biomarkers.

Prognostic importance of promoter hypermethylation of multiple genes in esophageal adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

We investigated aberrant methylation patterns in esophageal adenocarcinoma and correlated the findings to patient survival and tumor recurrence.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Gene promoter methylation was performed in 82 samples from 41 esophagectomy patients consisting of 41 adenocarcinoma samples, each with its adjacent nonmalignant tissue, which included one sample with Barretts metaplasia. The methylation status of seven genes was determined. Epigenetic silencing was confirmed using immunohistochemical staining. Kaplan-Meier plots were constructed using disease-specific survival as the primary end point and the interval from surgery to tumor recurrence as the secondary end point. The association of clinicopathological and biomolecular risk factors to survival and recurrence was performed using the Log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model for multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Methylation frequencies of the genes analyzed were APC, 68%; E-cadherin, 66%; O(6)-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase, 56%; ER, 51%; p16, 39%; DAP-kinase, 19%; and TIMP3, 19%. DNA methylation of some genes individually showed only trends toward diminished survival, whereas patients whose tumors had >50% of their gene profile methylated had both significantly poorer survival (P = 0.04) and earlier tumor recurrence (P = 0.05) than those without positive methylation. By multivariate analysis, the hazard ratios (HRs) with positive methylation status were more powerful predictors of survival [HR 2.7 (1.14-6.45; 95% confidence interval)] and tumor recurrence [HR 2.5 (1.11-5.6)] than age (HR 2.03 and 1.96, respectively) or stage (HR 1.48 and 1.67, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that positive methylation status for multiple genes in esophageal adenocarcinoma is a predictor of poor prognosis.

Mature survival results with preoperative cisplatin, protracted infusion 5-fluorouracil, and 44-Gy radiotherapy for esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

To assess the long-term survival results after cisplatin, protracted infusion 5-fluorouracil, and concurrent radiotherapy (RT) followed by surgical resection of esophageal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Ninety-two patients with esophageal cancer (65 with adenocarcinoma and 27 with squamous cell carcinoma) were treated in two sequential protocols of preoperative chemoradiotherapy. The patients had tumor confined to the esophagus and regional nodes, including celiac nodes for middle and distal lesions. In trial A (1989-1994), 50 patients were treated with 44 Gy RT (2 Gy/d) along with concurrent 5-fluorouracil 300 mg/m(2)/d given by protracted venous infusion on Days 1-30 and cisplatin 26 mg/m(2) on Days 1-5 and 26-30. In trial B (1995-1997, 42 patients), the chemotherapy dosages during RT were reduced to 5-fluorouracil 225 mg/m(2)/d protracted venous infusion and cisplatin 20 mg/m(2)/d on Days 1-5 and 16-30; three cycles of paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2)and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) were given postoperatively. Surgery generally occurred 4-6 weeks after completion of the planned preoperative therapy. Transhiatal resection was performed whenever possible.

RESULTS

Of the 92 patients, 86 (93%) underwent surgery (1 refused, 2 died preoperatively, and 3 developed evidence of metastatic disease). Of the 92 patients, 80 (87%) had complete resections with negative margins (3 had positive margins and 3 had distant metastases discovered at surgery). The pathologic complete response rate was 33% (30 of 92). The median follow-up was 63.5 months. The median survival and disease-specific survival for all enrolled patients was 35 and 59 months, respectively. The 5-year survival and disease-specific survival rate was 40% and 49%, respectively. Patients with a pathologic complete response had a 67% survival rate at 5 years (median not reached), and the remainder of patients had a 5-year survival rate of 27% (median 21 months; p <0.001). For 21 patients alive after 5 years (60-121 months), 2 died of their disease and all others were disease free. Eight patients with pathologic Stage I tumor at the time of surgery had survival similar to those with a complete response to preoperative therapy. The median survival for patients with pathologic Stage IIA, IIB, III, and IV disease at the time of surgery was 22, 13.5, 18, and 4.9 months, respectively. The pattern of initial failure was local/regional alone in 6% (5 of 90), local/regional plus distant in 3% (3 of 90), and distant alone in 47% (42 of 90). No differences were noted in survival or response rate between those with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma.

CONCLUSION

The promising 5-year survival results and low rate of late cancer-related deaths suggest that these regimens of intensive neoadjuvant therapy may improve the overall cure rate. The pathologic stage after neoadjuvant therapy is an important predictor of survival and may be useful in selecting patients for novel adjuvant therapies. Isolated local failure is uncommon, indicating that efforts to improve the therapeutic outcome should focus on optimizing systemic therapy rather than intensifying the RT. Additional randomized data are needed to assess the benefits of this therapeutic approach fully.

An intergroup phase III comparison of standard radiation therapy and two schedules of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable squamous cell head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

The Head and Neck Intergroup conducted a phase III randomized trial to test the benefit of adding chemotherapy to radiation in patients with unresectable squamous cell head and neck cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients were randomly assigned between arm A (the control), single daily fractionated radiation (70 Gy at 2 Gy/d); arm B, identical radiation therapy with concurrent bolus cisplatin, given on days 1, 22, and 43; and arm C, a split course of single daily fractionated radiation and three cycles of concurrent infusional fluorouracil and bolus cisplatin chemotherapy, 30 Gy given with the first cycle and 30 to 40 Gy given with the third cycle. Surgical resection was encouraged if possible after the second chemotherapy cycle on arm C and, if necessary, as salvage therapy on all three treatment arms. Survival data were compared between each experimental arm and the control arm using a one-sided log-rank test.

RESULTS

Between 1992 and 1999, 295 patients were entered on this trial. This did not meet the accrual goal of 362 patients and resulted in premature study closure. Grade 3 or worse toxicity occurred in 52% of patients enrolled in arm A, compared with 89% enrolled in arm B (P <.0001) and 77% enrolled in arm C (P <.001). With a median follow-up of 41 months, the 3-year projected overall survival for patients enrolled in arm A is 23%, compared with 37% for arm B (P =.014) and 27% for arm C (P = not significant).

CONCLUSION

The addition of concurrent high-dose, single-agent cisplatin to conventional single daily fractionated radiation significantly improves survival, although it also increases toxicity. The loss of efficacy resulting from split-course radiation was not offset by either multiagent chemotherapy or the possibility of midcourse surgery.

Organ preservation trials for laryngeal cancer

Organ-preservation strategies include definitive radiation therapy alone, induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy, and concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Over the past decade, induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy has been the standard for the nonsurgical management of advanced laryngeal cancer. Over this same period, however, other nonsurgical strategies have been under evaluation. These approaches include radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy to take advantage of the radiosensitizing properties of most cytotoxic drugs with activity against squamous cell cancer, altered fractionation radiotherapy, and the incorporation of molecularly targeted therapeutics into multimodality treatment.