Abstract S3-4: Ten year follow-up analysis of intense dose-dense adjuvant ETC (epirubicin (E), paclitaxel (T) and cyclophosphamide (C)) confirms superior DFS and OS benefit in comparison to conventional dosed chemotherapy in high-risk breast cancer patients with ≥ 4 positive lymph nodes

Background: The 5-year analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy with intense dose-dense (IDD) ETC had shown a significant improved DFS (HR 0.72; p < 0.001) and OS (HR 0.76; p = 0.29) in comparison with conventional dosed chemotherapy (J Clin Oncol 28: 2874–2880, 2010). In contrast to other dose-dense trials the ETC regimen is dose-dense and dose-intensified. Long-term results are essential to evaluate the impact of dose-dense chemotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer patients (pts). We now report the final analysis of DFS, OS, and long-term safety including the application of epoetin alfa after 10 years of follow-up.

Patients and Methods: A multi-center phase-III trial of the German AGO Breast Study Group recruited 1284 pts from 12/98 until 4/03. Pts below 65 years of age were eligible if at least 4 axillary lymph nodes were infiltrated. In the experimental arm, pts were assigned to receive three courses each of epirubicin (150 mg/m2), paclitaxel (225 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (2500 mg/m2) at 2-week intervals (q2w) (ETC) with G-CSF support (5µg/kg/SC day 3–10). In the standard arm 4 courses of conventional dosed epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (90/600 mg/m2) followed by 4 courses of paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) were given (EC→T). All cycles were administered in 3-week intervals without growth factor support. A second randomization ± epoetin alfa was performed in the IDD-ETC arm only (150IU/kg/sc three times weekly) to reduce the number of red blood cells (RBC's) transfusion and to evaluate the impact of epoetin alfa on DFS and OS in the adjuvant setting.

Results: 58% and 42% of the pts presented with 4–9 and ≥ 10 positive nodes with a median number of 8 involved nodes. The median age was 51 years and median follow-up was 122 months. We observed 604 DFS events (282 with IDD ETC; 322 with EC→T) (p = 0.00014, one-sided; HR 0.74; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.87). IDD ETC improved DFS irrespective of nodal status, HER2 and ER status. 446 pts. have died (201 events in the IDD ETC arm vs. 245 events in the standard arm). 10 year OS rates were 69% with IDD ETC and 59% with EC→ T (p = 0.0007; two-sided; HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.60–0.87). Nine cases of acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome occurred in the IDD ETC arm vs. two cases in the standard arm. 28% of pts in the IDD ETC arm vs. 13% in the IDD ETC arm plus epoetin alfa (p < 0.0001) received RBC's transfusions. There was no difference between the IDD ETC arm alone and the IDD ETC + epoetin alfa arm regarding 10-year DFS and OS ((57% vs. 55% (p = 0.69) and 70% vs. 68% (p = 0.45)).

Conclusion: Intense dose-dense ETC remains significantly superior compared to standard chemotherapy after 10 years of follow-up. The risk of secondary leukemia/MDS in the IDD ETC arm (1.3% of pts) is comparable to that of the Cancadian CEF regimen. The prevention of RBC's transfusions and anemia by the application of epoetin alfa in the IDD ETC-arm had no impact on DFS and OS. IDD ETC is a highly effective and safe regimen in the adjuvant treatment of high-risk breast cancer pts.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr S3-4.

Abstract OT3-3-11: A RANDOMIZED PHASE III TRIAL COMPARING NANOPARTICLE-BASED PACLITAXEL WITH SOLVENT-BASED PACLITAXEL AS PART OF NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH EARLY BREAST CANCER (GeparSepto) GBG 69

Background: Anthracycline/taxane based regimen are standard of care for neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer. Recent data from the neo-Tango study suggest that a reverse sequence of taxane followed by the anthracycline can achieve higher pCR rates. Solvent-based taxanes (paclitaxel, docetaxel) cause severe toxicities most likely by the solvents such as cremophor. Nab-paclitaxel is a solvent-free formulation of paclitaxel encapsulated in albumin. It is believed that nab-Paclitaxel compared to solvent based paclitaxel followed by conventional dosed EC might further improve the pCR rate in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment. Previous studies have shown that dual anti-HER blockade is superior to trastuzumab alone resulting in an increase of pCR rate by 20%.

Patients and Methods: The GeparSepto trial, a neoadjuvant, randomized phase III study, planned to include 1200 pts, randomized to nab-paclitaxel versus conventional, solvent based paclitaxel given weekly for 12 weeks followed in both arms by 4 cylces conventionally dosed EC. The primary objective is to compare the rate of pCR (ypT0 + ypN0). Further objectives are to compare the pCR rate in predefined subgroups, pCR by other definition, the clinical response rate and the rate of breast conserving surgery after chemotherapy in the two different treatment arms.

Women with untreated, histologically confirmed uni- or bilateral, cT2- cT4d carcinoma, and no clinically relevant cardiovascular and other co-morbidities are randomized to receive either paclitaxel (80mg/m2) or nab-paclitaxel (150 mg/ m2) day 1, 8, 15, q d 22 for 4 cycles followed by conventional EC (E (90mg/m2)+C (600 mg/m2)) on day 1 q day 22 for 4 cycles. HER2 positive pts receive trastuzumab (loading dose 8mg/kg followed by 6 mg/kg) and pertuzumab (loading dose 840 mg followed by 420 mg) q3w concomitantly to the chemotherapy. Biomaterial including FFPE form core biopsy, serum, plasma, full blood is collected before randomization, after the 12 cycles for (nab−) paclitaxel therapy and after the 4 cycles of EC before surgery. The HER2, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, Ki67 and SPARC status will be centrally tested by immunohistochemistry prior to randomization for stratification. A broad translational program is planned. It has been assumed that solvent based taxane will achieve an overall pCR rate of 33% to be increased using nab-paclitaxel to 41%, corresponding to an odds ratio of 1.41. If 596 patients are enrolled into each arm, a χ2-test will have an 80% power with a 2-sided significance level α=0.05 to show the superiority of nab-paclitaxel. Closed test procedure will be used to test for non-inferiority of nab-paclitaxel first.

The trial is registered under NCT01583426. It is financially supported by Roche and Celgene.

Results: The centres have been initiated after approval by ethics committee and authorities.

First patient in will be this months. It is planned to recruit 18 months in 100 sites in Germany.

Conclusion: Geparsepto will investigate the efficacy of neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel compared to solvent based paclitaxel given weekly and the dual blockade with Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab in HER 2 positive BC.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-3-11.

Abstract P5-18-02: Selective Crossover in Randomized Trials of Adjuvant Trastuzumab for Breast Cancer: Coping with Success

BACKGROUND: Disease-free survival (DFS) is often a primary endpoint of randomized trials of adjuvant therapies for breast cancer, but long-term follow-up of DFS and especially overall survival (OS) remain important. When the primary DFS results favor the experimental arm, patients (pts) assigned to the control group may select the option to crossover to receive the experimental treatment via protocol amendment. Such “selective crossover” disturbs the integrity of the randomized comparison for any efficacy endpoints that rely on further follow-up. Selective crossover, which is motivated by positive results having been observed in the current trial, is distinct from so-called “unplanned crossover,” which refers to non-adherence to protocol. In this abstract, we discuss the consequences of selective crossover for trials evaluating adjuvant trastuzumab, using the HERA (HERceptin Adjuvant) trial as an example, and present a variety of alternative analysis approaches.

METHODS: HERA enrolled 5102 women with HER2-positive early breast cancer who had completed all surgery and (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy to compare 1 or 2 years of trastuzumab treatment vs observation. After a positive first interim analysis at 1y median follow-up (MFU) showed that 1 year of trastuzumab significantly improved DFS vs observation [MJ Piccart-Gebhart et al; NEJM 2005], event-free patients in the observation group were offered crossover to receive trastuzumab. 885 (52%) of the 1698 pts in the observation group selectively crossed over to trastuzumab.

RESULTS: Previously reported intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis of HERA at 4y MFU showed a decreasing effectiveness of trastuzumab with respect to DFS compared with those at 2y MFU [L Gianni et al, Lancet Oncol 2011; I Smith et al, Lancet 2007]. In addition, the ITT analysis of OS at 4y MFU showed little effect of trastuzumab, while the analysis artificially censoring follow-up in the observation group at the time of selective crossover showed a substantial OS advantage for trastuzumab.

Abstract PD06-01: Automated computational Ki67 scoring in the GeparTrio breast cancer study cohort

Background: Scoring proliferation through Ki67-immunohistochemistry is an important component in predicting therapy response to chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Therefore, an accurate and standardized Ki67-scoring is pivotal both in routine diagnostics and larger multi-center studies aiming at improving present or establishing new cut-off values for existing or novel therapy regimens. However, recent studies have cast some doubt on the reliability of “visual” Ki67 scoring by pathologists, especially within the lower - yet clinically important - proliferation range. Here, we present and apply a novel automated image analysis approach for Ki67-quantification in breast cancer tissue.

Methods: We perform automated Ki67-scoring in 1219 breast cancer patients from the GeparTrio study cohort using a novel image analysis approach that avoids detection biases due to morphological variability by using a generic minimum-model approach. The method is capable of tumor-stroma-separation and may be used to process large data sets fully unsupervised in batch mode while allowing for efficient visual checks of the results. We compare these results with a different in-house-developed subtiling-based automated quantification method and moreover, gauge our approach with manual scoring performed by pathologists.

Results: The results show deviations of 10% (automated method 1 vs. manual), 9% (automated method 2 vs. manual) and 3% (automated method 1 vs. automated method 2) on average. The Ki67 scores show Pearson correlations between automated and manual scoring of r>0.8 (p < 0.001) for both automated methods and r>0.95 (p < 0.001) between the two tested automated methods.

Conclusion: Because of the methodological differences of the presented techniques our results suggest a high robustness of the automated methods that at the same time show a good agreement with manual Ki67 scoring. Our approach therefore offers an automated and standardized means of Ki67 quantification applicable in routine diagnostics as well as larger clinical study settings, such as in the GeparTrio cohort shown here.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD06-01.

Abstract P6-09-08: COMPliance and Arthralgia in Clinical Therapy: The COMPACT trial, assessing the incidence of arthralgia, therapy costs and compliance within the first year of adjuvant anastrozole therapy

Background: Aromatase Inhibitors (AI) are well established as adjuvant treatment for postmenopausal (PMP) women with hormone receptor positive (HR+) early breast cancer (EBC). However, phase III clinical trials have reported higher rates of arthralgia associated with AI than tamoxifen. This study aims to collect real world data on the effects of AI-associated arthralgia on patient compliance, patient outcomes and on treatment of arthralgia.

Methods: COMPACT is an open, prospective, non-interventional, non-randomized study (NCT00857012) run in Germany. PMP women with HR+ EBC who had been on adjuvant anastrozole (ANA) for 3–6 months were enrolled and stratified by initial adjuvant ANA or switch from tamoxifen. All patients received regular standardized information about breast cancer from baseline to week 20 to support treatment compliance. Data on demographics, arthralgia, related therapies, other side effects and QoL were collected at baseline, 3, 6 and 9 months. Primary endpoints are scaled data on arthralgia and compliance within the first year of ANA therapy. Secondary endpoints include incidence of arthralgia, therapy costs, reasons for non-compliance, and influence of arthralgia on clinical outcome.

Results: Between Apr 2009 and Mar 2011, 2313 patients were enrolled, 2007 on upfront ANA and 306 on switch from tamoxifen. The mean age at baseline was 64.5 years, mean BMI 27.7. Only 17.0% of patients had received HRT prior to their EBC. At baseline, 41.9% reported symptoms relating to skeleton or musculature. 12.0% reported arthralgia existing prior to ANA treatment and 13.2% stated a worsening of pre-existing arthralgia or new arthralgia after starting ANA. Predictors for non-adherence to AI therapy were former non-adherence, general symptom load on the side effect scale GASE, and low benefit expectation at treatment start. Risk of arthralgia was related to BMI (lowest for patients with BMI ≤24.1 kg/m2, highest with BMI >30.5 kg/m2 at all time points; OR>1) and upfront therapy (switch patients had a reduced risk of 68% at 6 and 61% at 9 months compared to patients with ANA upfront, p = 0.002). Patients with prior chemotherapy had lower rates of arthralgia before start of ANA (10.4% vs 13.3%, p = 0.036) but higher rates after the start of ANA and before study start (27.0% vs 22.5%, p = 0.013). Patients with arthralgia showed higher compliance rates at all time points (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: COMPACT identified arthralgia and musculoskeletal symptoms as common complaints in PMP women with EBC. ANA treatment both increased the number of women with such symptoms and aggravated these in some patients. Higher BMI and upfront AI predicted for risk of AI associated arthralgia. However, COMPACT also showed that AI-associated arthralgia did not lead to non-compliance in most patients. This data may help to better understand compliance issues with adjuvant AI treatment.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-09-08.

Abstract P1-14-01: Adding capecitabine and trastuzumab to neoadjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy - first survival analysis of the GBG/AGO intergroup-study GeparQuattro

Background: Previous results of the GeparQuattro study demonstrated that adding capecitabine either simultaneously or sequentially to EC-Docetaxel (D) neoadjuvant chemotherapy could not increase pathological complete response rates (pCR) (von Minckwitz G, JCO 2010). However, patients with HER2-positive disease treated simultaneously with trastuzumab showed a significant higher pCR rate than patients with HER2-negative disease treated with chemotherapy alone (Untch M, JCO 2010). We here report survival after a median follow up of 58 months including 279 relapses and 191 deaths.

Patients and methods: Patients with either large operable (cT3) and locally advanced (cT4) tumors, or hormone-receptor (HR)-negative receptor status, or HR-positive tumors but clinically node-positive disease were recruited to receive 4 cycles of EC (90mg/m2/600mg/m2) and randomized to either 4 cycles of D (100mg/m2) or 4 cycles of DX (75mg/m2/1800mg/m2) or 4 cycles of D (75mg/m2) followed by 4 cycles of X (1800mg/m2) (D→X). Patients with HER-2 positive tumors received 1 year of trastuzumab, the first part concurrent to all chemotherapy cycles. All patients with HR+ tumors received endocrine therapy according to current standard. The intent-to-treat survival analysis included 1421 patients for the chemotherapy question and 1495 patients for the trastuzumab question. Analyses were adjusted by age, stage, size, nodal status, histologic type, grade, hormone-receptor (HR) and HER2-status at baseline (if applicable).

Results: No difference in DFS and OS was seen for patients receiving D, DX or D-X overall (hazard ratio 0.978, p = 0.984 and hazard ratio 0.986, p = 0.684, respectively) as well as by phenotype defined according to St. Gallen (all P>0.354).

Patients with HER2-positive disease treated additionally with trastuzumab showed significantly better OS (p = 0.015) compared to patients with HER2-negative disease treated with chemotherapy alone. DFS was significantly better for trastuzumab-treated patients with HR-negative tumors (p = 0.046), but not with HR-positive tumors (p = 0.790). OS after first relapse was significantly better in trastuzumab-retreated patients with HER2-positive tumors (p = 0.032) compared to relapsed patients with HER2-negative tumors.

Patients with an early response after 4 cycles, with a clinical response at surgery and with a pCR showed a significantly better DFS and OS compared to patients without pCR (p = 0.022, P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001). This benefit was most prominent in patients with triple-negative tumors.

Conclusions: Survival analysis of the GeparQuattro study confirmed the results of the primary endpoint analysis on pCR. Capecitabine could not improve outcome when added to anthracycline-taxane-based chemotherapy. As suggested by a recent integrated multi-level meta-analysis (von Minckwitz, BCRT 2011) effect of capecitabine could not be properly assessed in this study as planned docetaxel doses in arms DX and D®X were lower than in arm D. Survival of HER-2 positive patients surmounts that of HER2-negative patients if trastuzumab is used in the neoadjuvant as well as in the metastatic setting.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-14-01.

Abstract S4-5: Ki67 levels in pretherapeutic core biopsies as predictive and prognostic parameters in the neoadjuvant GeparTrio trial

Background: Ki67 has been suggested as a marker for definition of luminal A and luminal B tumors by the 2011 St. Gallen consensus panel. However, the cutoffs for Ki67 are still under debate. In particular, it is not clear if one single cutoff is useful for prognostic and predictive information in the different molecular subtypes. It is an advantage of the neoadjuvant approach that predictive and prognostic outcome measurements can be separated in the same cohort. In this study, we evaluated a large cohort of core biopsies from the neoadjuvant GeparTrio trial to investigate the impact of pretherapeutic Ki67 levels as a predictive marker for response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy as well as a prognostic marker for progression-free and overall survival. The analysis was stratified for hormone-receptor positive and negative tumors as well as HER2 status.

Methods: A total of 1166 pretherapeutic core biopsies from the neoadjuvant Gepartrio trial were evaluated for Ki67 by immunohistochemistry, a total of 200 cells were counted in each sample. Ki67 cutoffs were evaluated using web-based software Cutoff Finder (http://molpath.charite.de/cutoff/). The details of the GeparTrio study design have been described before (von Minckwitz, JNCI 2008). We compared pCR rate as well as the overall and disease free survival in the complete cohort as well as subgroups of patients based on hormone receptor and HER2 expression.

Results: Using Ki67 as a continuous parameter, a wide range of cutoffs between 10% and 80% for Ki67 were predictive for pCR. For DFS and OS, a wide range of cutoffs between 10% and 45% was significant. For further analysis, the three groups of Ki67 0–15% vs. Ki67 15.1%–35% vs. Ki67 >35 were defined and were compared for different outcome parameters. The pCR rates in these three groups of Ki67 expression were 4.2%, 12.9% and 29.0% (p < 0.0005). For DFS and OS, the groups were significantly linked to prognosis in univariate and multivariate analysis. A detailed subgroup analysis was performed showing that Ki67 was significantly predictive for pCR in all molecular subgroups. However, in subgroup survival analysis, Ki67 was prognostic in luminal, but not in triple-negative tumors.

Conclusion: Ki67 is a valid predictive and prognostic marker in breast cancer. This marker is significant over a wide range of different cutoffs, which explains the different results of Ki67 cutoffs in different previous studies. Therefore, the variability observed in different studies evaluating Ki67 might reflect A) the wide range of valid cutoffs B) the different clinical endpoints of the studies and C) the different contribution of the molecular subtypes in the study cohorts. Based on our results we suggest three subgroups for Ki67 (0–15% vs. 15.1–35 vs. >35%) as a reasonable approach for further standardization of this marker.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr S4-5.

Abstract OT1-1-13: Dual blockade with Afatinib and Trastuzumab as neooadjuvant treatment for patients with locally advanced or operable breast cancer receiving taxane-anthracycline containing chemotherapy (DAFNE)-GBG70

Background: Anthracycline/taxane based combination chemotherapy of at least 18 weeks represents the standard of care in the neoadjuvant setting. In HER2 positive disease trastuzumab is given concurrently to chemotherapy and achieves a pCR rate (no invasive residuals in breast and nodes) of approx. 40% which can be increased by double anti HER2 blockade by approximately 20%. There are no data on the combination of afatinib (BIBW 2992), an irreversible HER family inhibitor with trastuzumab.

Methods: This is a multi-centre, prospective, open-label phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of afatinib in combination with weekly paclitaxel + trastuzumab followed by epirubicin/cyclophosphamide/trastuzumab as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with untreated HER2-positive early breast cancer. Pts with histologically confirmed, centrally reviewed HER2 positive, unilateral, primary operable or locally advanced breast cancer can be included. Tumor size has to be at least 2cm by sonography.

All patients will be treated for a total duration of 30 weeks (6 weeks with afatinib (20mg) and trastuzumab (8/6mg/kg) alone, 12 weeks with weekly paclitaxel (80mg/m2), afatinib and trastuzumab and 12 weeks with epirubicin/cyclophosphamide/trastuzumab according to standard). During the first 2 weeks afatinib 20 mg will be given only every other day to reduce the risk of diarrhea and skin toxicities. Primary prophylaxis with loperamide 2×2 mg daily is obligatory during the first 4 weeks of afatinib/trastuzumab and the first 2 weeks of afatinib/trastuzumab/paclitaxel. Thereafter prophylaxis with loperamide can be stopped if no diarrhea grade > 1 occurred.

Primary objective is pathological complete response (pCR = ypT0/is ypN0). Secondary objectives are pCR by other definitions, clinical response rates, rate and type of surgery, toxicity and compliance, pCR related to skin toxicity and diarrhoea and pre-specified molecular markers. An extensive biomaterial collection is integreated, including obligatory biomaterial (e.g. skin biopsies) collection at baseline, prior to start of paclitaxel at the end of paclitaxel and prior to surgery.

Neoadjuvant anthracycline-taxane-based chemotherapy given simultaneously with trastuzumab after central HER 2-testing results in a pCR rate of approx. 50%. The addition of a dual anti HER2 blockade to chemotherapy increased the pCR by absolute 20%. A pCR rate of 70% is expectedand and a pCR rate of 55% or lower excluded; with α=0.1 and 1-ß=80%, this requires 65 evaluable patients for two-sided one group χ2-test. An integrated safety phase is planned for the first 15 patients entering the study.

The trial is registered under NCT015591477. It is financially supported by Boehringer Ingelheim.

Results: Centres have been initiated after approval by ethics committee and authorities. Three patients have been recruited. It is planned to recruit 12 months in 15 sites in Germany.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-1-13.

The 21-gene recurrence score assay impacts adjuvant therapy recommendations for ER-positive, node-negative and node-positive early breast cancer resulting in a risk-adapted change in chemotherapy use

Background

We carried out a prospective clinical study to evaluate the impact of the Recurrence Score (RS) on treatment decisions in early breast cancer (EBC).

Patients and methods

A total of 379 eligible women with estrogen receptor positive (ER+), HER2-negative EBC and 0–3 positive lymph nodes were enrolled. Treatment recommendations, patients' decisional conflict, physicians' confidence before and after knowledge of the RS and actual treatment data were recorded.

Results

Of the 366 assessable patients 244 were node negative (N0) and 122 node positive (N+). Treatment recommendations changed in 33% of all patients (N0 30%, N+ 39%). In 38% of all patients (N0 39%, N+ 37%) with an initial recommendation for chemoendocrine therapy, the post-RS recommendation changed to endocrine therapy, in 25% (N0 22%, N+ 39%) with an initial recommendation for endocrine therapy only to combined chemoendocrine therapy, respectively. A patients' decisional conflict score improved by 6% (P = 0.028) and physicians' confidence increased in 45% (P < 0.001) of all cases. Overall, 33% (N0 29%, N+ 38%) of fewer patients actually received chemotherapy as compared with patients recommended chemotherapy pre-test. Using the test was cost-saving versus current clinical practice.

Conclusion

RS-guided chemotherapy decision-making resulted in a substantial modification of adjuvant chemotherapy usage in node-negative and node-positive ER+ EBC.

PD07-05: Local Recurrence Risk in 6377 Patients with Early Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Anthracycline-Taxane +/− Trastuzumab Containing Chemotherapy

Background: Locoregional recurrence (LRR; defined according to Hudis C, JCO 2007) risk after neoadjuvant systemic treatment is considered as a possible hazard of this treatment approach. However, few data exist on the incidence and risk factors for LRR after anthracycline-taxane+/−trastuzumab (AT+/−H) containing neoadjuvant treatment. We analyzed individual data of 7 prospective neoadjuvant trials conducted by the German Breast Group and the AGO Breast Group.

Patients (Pts) and methods: 6377 Pts with operable or locally advanced, non-metastatic breast cancer were analyzed (for details see von Minckwitz G et al, BCRT 2010). Postsurgical radiotherapy was indicated after breast conservation for all patients and after mastectomy for patients with cT3/4 or cN+ disease. Endocrine treatment was given to ER− and/or PgR-positive patients. 485 LRR were observed during a median follow up of 46.2 (0-127) months.

Results: LRR was similar for patients treated by tumorectomy (7.2% of N=1123), segmentectomy (6.8% of N=1121), quadrantectomy (7% of 557), or breast conservation (BCT) (not otherwise specified) (7.7% of N=819), but higher in patients treated by mastectomy (ME) (12.1% of N=1670) (p&lt;0.001). Rate of breast conservation decreased by increasing initial tumor size (cT1(N=198): 77.7%, cT2(N=3675): 78.1%, cT3(N=795): 49.4%, cT4a-c(N=348): 35.9%, cT4d(N=235):19.1%). LRR in patients treated by BCT or ME were 9.1% vs 9.1% for cT1 (p=0.9); 6.9% vs. 9.8% for cT2 (p=0.001); 9.7% vs 14.2% for cT3 (p=0.04); 3.2% vs. 11.7% for cT4a-c (p=0.004; and 22.2% vs 18.9% for cT4d (p=0.4). LRR increased with surgical yT-stage from 4.7% for ypT0 (N=990), 11.8% for ypTis (N=340), 9.1% for ypT1 (N=1555), 8.2% for ypT2 (N=926), 13.8% for ypT3 (N=232), 20% ypT4a-c (N=80), to 31.2% for ypT4d (N=16) (p&lt;0.001). Comparable results were obtained for cN and ypN stages. Patients with a pathological complete response (pCR = ypT0 ypN0) showed a lower LRR of 3.7% compared to patients not achieving a pCR (3.7% vs 9.9% (HR 0.36 p&lt;0.001). Patients with a pCR showed low LRR in all intrinsic subtypes except Luminal B/HER2+ -like tumors (Luminal A-like tumors (N=105; 3.8%), Luminal B/HER2− -like (N=40; 0%), Luminal B/Her2+ -like (N=124; 8.1%), HER2+(non-luminal)-like (N=158; 1.9%), triple-negative (N=276; 2.5%) (p=0.016). Patients without a pCR showed an excessive LRR for HER2+(non-luminal) and triple-negative tumors (Luminal A-like tumors (N=1498; 5.1%), Luminal B/HER2− -like (N=304; 11.9%), Luminal B/HER2+ -like (N=602; 8.5%), HER2+(non-luminal)-like (N=367; 18%) and triple-negative (N=276; 17.8%) (p&lt;0.001). cT, cN, ypN, intrinsic subtype, but not ypT stage and type of surgery were independent predictors of LRR for patients without pCR in a Cox regression model. None of these factors except Luminal B/HER2+ (p=0.012) were significant in patients with pCR.

Conclusions: LRR in this large pooled analysis after AT+/−H containing neoadjuvant treatment appears to be low, especially in all patients with a pCR except Luminal B/HER2+ disease. In patients without a pCR low cT, cN, ypN and Luminal tumor type predict a low LRR. Other stages and subtypes without pCR should be carefully followed up irrespective of type of surgery.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD07-05.

PD06-07: COMPliance and Arthralgias in Clinical Therapy (COMPACT): Assessment of the Incidence and Severity of Arthralgia, Treatment Costs and Compliance within the First Year of Adjuvant Anastrozole Therapy

Introduction: Aromatase inhibitors (AI) are well established as adjuvant endocrine treatment for postmenopausal (PMP) women with HR+ early breast cancer (EBC). However, according to retrospective data, compliance to adjuvant endocrine therapy for EBC may drop to below 70% after one year and to as low as 50% by year 4. In clinical trials, AI are significantly more frequently associated with arthralgia than tamoxifen. Yet, prospective real world data on the effects of AI-associated arthralgia on patient compliance, patient outcomes as well as treatment costs of arthralgia are lacking.

Methods: COMPACT is an open, prospective, non-interventional study assessing the incidence and severity of arthralgia, treatment costs, and compliance within the first year of adjuvant anastrozole therapy in PMP women with HR+ EBC. The study is sponsored by AstraZeneca Germany and supported by three major German health insurance funds [GWQ ServicePlus AG, DAK, TK]. Patients on adjuvant treatment for 3–6 months were enrolled at 620 breast centres and practices throughout Germany and stratified by, a) initial adjuvant anastrozole therapy or, b) switch from tamoxifen to anastrozole. All patients receive regular standardized information about EBC from baseline to week 20 to support treatment compliance. Data on patient demographics, occurrence of and treatment of arthralgia, and quality of life will be collected at baseline, 3, 6 and 9 months. Primary endpoints are scaled data on arthralgia, assessed with a visual analogous scale (VAS) via patient questionnaire, and compliance to anastrozole in both strata, assessed by patient and investigator questionnaire. Secondary endpoints include the incidence of arthralgia, treatment costs, reasons for non-compliance, and the influence of arthralgia on clinical outcome. For a subgroup of patients data on arthralgia treatment and compliance will be validated with corresponding data of the participating health insurance funds.

Results: Between April 2009 and February 2011, 2313 patients were recruited, 2007 receiving upfront anastrozole and 306 patients on switch therapy. Preliminary baseline data for 2313 patients show the following patient characteristics: mean age 64.5 years, mean BMI 27.7. Only 16.8% of patients had received hormone replacement therapy prior to their cancer. 41.5% of patients had concomitant symptoms relating to skeleton or musculature, and 11.9% stated arthralgias existing prior to anastrozole treatment. 13.1% reported a worsening of pre-existing arthralgias or new arthralgia after starting on anastrozole treatment.

Conclusion: COMPACT aims to provide valid real world data on the incidence and severity of AI-associated arthralgia, treatment modalities and treatment costs. Our results will help to understand and better counsel patients about AI-associated arthralgia to improve adherence to AI-treatment, breast cancer outcomes, and therapy costs.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD06-07.

Abstract P6-12-04: Patterns of Trastuzumab-Based Treatment in Advanced Breast Cancer — Results from a Large GERMAN Non-Interventional Study

Background: In an ongoing, prospective observation study, treatment pattern of HER2 antibody-based treatment in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in clinical routine is evaluated in Germany since 2001. Material and methods: A total of 1.687 patients (pts), presenting with Her2neu overexpressing MBC either pretreated (39%) or naïve to palliative chemotherapy (CT), were recorded in 202 German institutions. The median duration of fully documented therapy was 51 weeks. Additional information on trastuzumab (T) treatment beyond progression (TBP) was retrieved, as well as long-term outcomes, progression-free and overall survival (PFS, OS) in a subgroup of 940 pts, in which the treatment documentation had been finalized before July 2007.

Results: According to the most recent recommendations the majority of pts received T concurrently with chemotherapy (74%), 14% received T in combination with endocrine therapy (ETO). and 12% T as single agent therapy (SAT). In a multivariate logistic model, the choice of a non-cytotoxic regimen (ETO/SAT) was independently associated with the following pts characteristics: no visceral metastasis (p = 0.0000002), and positive hormone receptor status (p = 0.0018), while higher patient age (&gt; 65 y) (p = 0.061), and number of metastatic sites &lt; 2 showed a clear trend. No major correlation was observed between administration of cytotoxic treatment and relapse-free interval after initial diagnosis of breast cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant hormone therapy, and metastatic disease at initial diagnosis. After a median follow-up of more than 30 months (mo), median PFS (840 events) was 11.1, 9.9 and 19.1 mo and median OS (530 deaths) was 32.7, 39.6 and 48.8 mo in the CT, SAT and ETO group, respectively. Overall best response rates were 64%, 47%, and 45%.

Trastuzumab TBP was applied with a growing tendency over time and could be analyzed in a subgroup of 376 first-line patients with progression within approximately one year. The prolongation of trastuzumab remains to be strongly associated with longer survival after first progression in this updated analysis (medians: 15.1 vs. 20.6 mo; HR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.49 - 0.88; p = 0.0045).

Conclusion: This large non-interventional trial reveals that 74% of all included patients were treated with trastuzumab plus CT which is considered standard of care for 1stline HER2+ MBC. The decision for not choosing a CT-based regimen was associated with good prognostic factors (no visceral metastasis, positive hormone receptor status, only one metastatic site) or higher age. Trastuzumab beyond progression is used increasingly in routine clinical practice and results in a prolonged survival.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-12-04.

Abstract P5-11-12: Quality of Life in the PACT-Programme (Patient's Anastrozole Compliance to Therapy Programme): Influence of a Standardized Information Service on Patient Satisfaction and Health Related Quality of Life in Postmenopausal Women with Early Breast Cancer (EBC)

Introduction: In recent years, patient reported outcomes have become increasingly a focus in clinical investigations. Health related quality of life (HRQoL) is now regularly evaluated in clinical trials, yet data on HRQoL in postmenopausal women receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor treatment for early breast cancer (EBC) is limited. Here, we present the 12 months results on HRQoL and patient satisfaction from PACT, a program which aims to increase awareness, motivation and adherence to adjuvant anastrozole therapy in routine clinical practice by adding regular standardized information (brochures and motivational letters) to standard clinical care.

Methods: PACT is a prospective, randomised, two-arm parallel-group study with 60 months follow-up (NCT00555867, sponsored by AstraZeneca Germany). Postmenopausal women on anastrozole for hormone-receptor positive (HR+) EBC were randomized to routine clinical care alone or additional regular standardized information (educational arm) for the first year of adjuvant endocrine therapy. Primary endpoint was the compliance rate in the educational vs. routine arm after 12 months. Secondary endpoints include HRQoL and patient satisfaction, evaluated via EORTC IN-PATSAT32, QLQ-C30, and QLQ-BR23. The present analysis focuses on differences in HRQoL and patient satisfaction between the standard and educational arm and between compliant and non-compliant patients at 12 months after treatment initiation.

Results: 4,923 patients were enrolled into PACT by Nov. 2008. Of these, 2,707 were evaluable for analysis of the primary endpoint compliance and the secondary endpoints patient satisfaction and HRQoL. Analysis of HRQoL and patient satisfaction scores showed no differences between the standard and the educational arm at 12 months. When comparing compliant vs. non-compliant patients, however, compliant patients reached significantly higher (=better) patient satisfaction scores in all domains. In addition, compliant patients achieved significantly higher (=better) scores in the HRQoL domains of physical functioning (p=0.04), emotional functioning (p=0.018), cognitive functioning (p=0.004), social functioning (p=0.005), and sexual enjoyment (p=0.047), as well as lower (=better) scores in the domains of fatigue (p=0.01), systemic therapy (p=0.003), and arm symptoms (p=0.03). After correction for multiple testing, statistically significant differences favouring compliant patients were retained in the areas of information provision and availability (p=0.0008 and p=0.0005, respectively).

Conclusion: In postmenopausal patients with HR+ EBC assigned to adjuvant endocrine treatment with an aromatase inhibitor (anastrozole), HRQoL and patient satisfaction were not affected by the intervention. However, analysis of compliant vs. non-compliant patients revealed improved scores for patient satisfaction in multivariate analysis favouring compliant patients at 12 months after treatment initiation. PACT represents an important project in health outcomes research regarding adjuvant endocrine therapy in postmenopausal patients with HR+ EBC.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-11-12.