Candidemia in cancer patients: a prospective, multicenter surveillance study by the Invasive Fungal Infection Group (IFIG) of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)

In a surveillance study of candidemia in cancer patients that was conducted by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, 249 episodes were noted; Candida albicans was isolated in 70% (63) of the 90 cases involving patients with solid tumors (tumor patients) and in 36% (58) of the 159 involving those with hematologic disease (hematology patients). Neutropenia in tumor patients and acute leukemia and antifungal prophylaxis in hematology patients were significantly associated with non-albicans candidemia in a multivariate analysis. Overall 30-day mortality was 39% (97 of 249). In a univariate analysis, Candida glabrata was associated with the highest mortality rate (odds ratio, 2.66). Two multivariate analyses showed that mortality was associated with older age and severity of the underlying disease. Among hematology patients, additional factors associated with mortality were allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, septic shock, and lack of antifungal prophylaxis.

Strategies for cost-containment: once-daily ceftriaxone plus amikacin as empiric therapy for febrile granulocytopenic children with cancer

Administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics as empiric therapy to febrile granulocytopenic patients has become a widely accepted practice. In order to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ceftriaxone plus amikacin in single daily doses as empiric treatment for febrile granulocytopenic children with cancer, a retrospective review (January-December 1996) of all febrile episodes at our institution was carried out. Overall, 101 febrile episodes in 89 granulocytopenic children with cancer were empirically treated with a once-daily ceftriaxone plus amikacin combination. 59/101 (59%) patients had absolute granulocyte count lower than 100/mm3 at entry; 46 (45%) were affected by solid tumors, 16 (15%) by Hodgkin's disease or lymphoma, and 30 (30%) patients underwent bone marrow transplantation. The ceftriaxone plus amikacin combination was effective in 72/101 (72%) patients with a median time to defervescence of 3 days (range, 1-4). We also evaluated the economic advantages of the ceftriaxone plus amikacin once-daily regimen when compared with another treatment regimen such as ceftazidime plus amikacin requiring three daily doses. Compared with the multiple daily dose regimen of ceftazidime plus amikacin, there is a cost saving of US $11 (17,500 Italian liras) and US $66 (105,000 Italian liras) for both 1-day and 6-day treatments, respectively, by using the single daily dose regimen of ceftriaxone plus amikacin. The potential of ceftriaxone to lower costs in hospitalized patients depends upon its comparable efficacy with other extended-spectrum beta-lactams, in which case it can reduce overall treatment costs because of its once-daily administration schedule.

Economic aspects of empiric antibiotic therapy for febrile neutropenia in children with cancer

Several antibiotic regimens have been proposed worldwide for empiric treatment of febrile neutropenia in children with cancer, but none of them shows clear advantages in terms of clinical efficacy. Therefore, other parameters, including drug acquisition costs, should be considered in the selection of treatment. Children receive a "fraction" of a standard daily dose, and this fraction is generally calculated on the basis of body weight; therefore, the cost of each day of therapy is determined by the packages available for each single drug. We calculated the acquisition costs of various drugs proposed for the empiric treatment of febrile neutropenia in children with cancer, and then we estimated the daily cost of therapy referred to different patient weights. In general, the combination regimen with ceftriaxone plus aminoglycoside turned out to be less expensive than other regimens (including monotherapy with third-generation cephalosporins or carbapenems).

Italian guidelines for the management of infectious complications in pediatric oncology: empirical antimicrobial therapy of febrile neutropenia

The Italian Association for Paediatric Haematology and Oncology prepared a guideline document aimed at unifying and rationalising as much as possible the management of febrile neutropenia in children with cancer, because of the potential impact of these procedures on hospital costs and on the development of antibiotic resistance. Before starting anti-infective therapy, at least 2 blood cultures, a throat swab, urine-culture, and cultures from any suspected infected site, should be performed. Routine chest X-rays at onset of febrile neutropenia are probably not necessary, in absence of respiratory signs. At the present time, the safer option probably remains the combination of a beta-lactam and an aminoglycoside, and treating febrile neutropenia outside of hospital should be considered an investigational approach. The choice of the most appropriated regimen for each institution should be based also on the local bacteriological statistics and patterns of bacterial resistance. Antibiotic toxicity and cost should be other important factors. Every subsequent addition or substitution of antibiotics should be based on objective signs of clinical deterioration. The only accepted empirical modification is empirical antifungal therapy, while the empirical addition of a glycopeptide antibiotic cannot be recommended.

The evolution of the empirical management of fever and neutropenia in cancer patients

Infectious complications are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients, especially those receiving chemotherapy. Furthermore, neutropenia, fever and infection limit the dose-intensity of antineoplastic chemotherapy in cancer patients. Fever without clinical signs of a localized infection is the commonest clinical presentation in neutropenic patients. Early empirical administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics at the onset of fever has become common practice, but the specific empirical regimen remains controversial. Guidance from therapeutic clinical trials is not straightforward, since it is difficult to compare trials, due to major differences and deficiencies in their design and analysis. Clinical trials fall into two categories: (i) explanatory trials which assess the hypothesis under ideal conditions, and (ii) pragmatic trials, which assess the regimen under the conditions of clinical practice. Methodological issues that are of crucial importance in the recognition of limits and value of the results of clinical trials in this field are discussed. The EORTC-IATCG has performed nine large therapeutic trials of empirical antibacterial and antifungal therapy in febrile, neutropenic patients with cancer. The results of trials, V, VIII, IX and XI are reviewed, and issues to be resolved in future trials are also considered.

Comparison of an enzyme immunoassay and a latex agglutination system for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in bone marrow transplant recipients

The performance of two Aspergillus antigenemia systems, the sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), Platelia Aspergillus test, and the latex agglutination (LA), Pastorex Aspergillus test, in the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis were compared by testing 364 serum samples from 22 bone marrow transplant (BMT) recipients. Sensitivity and specificity for the ELISA test were 60% and 82% respectively, vs 40% and 94% for the LA test. In the two patients found positive with both methods, the ELISA test became positive earlier than the LA test or remained positive after the LA test had become negative. These results encourage further evaluation of the Platelia Aspergillus test, to assess its role in the management of invasive aspergillosis in BMT patients.

A comparison of outcome from febrile neutropenic episodes in children compared with adults: results from four EORTC studies. International Antimicrobial Therapy Cooperative Group (IATCG) of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)

The object of this study was to determine whether there were any differences between the 'typical' child with fever and neutropenia and their adult counterpart with regard to infection type and outcome, by analysis of 3080 patients, including 759 children < 18 years of age and 2321 adults. These represented patients randomized in previous trials, between 1986 and 1994, which compared empirical antibiotic regimens for fever in neutropenic patients. There were fewer childhood acute myeloid leukaemia patients than adults but more acute lymphoblastic leukaemia cases and more with solid tumours undergoing intensive myelosuppressive therapy. The children were less likely to be undergoing first induction therapy but the relative incidence of patients receiving relapse schedules or maintenance therapies were not significantly different in the two age groups. Children less frequently had a defined site of infection than adults and where they had a defined site there were more upper respiratory tract but fewer lung infections. There was a similar low incidence of shock at presentation in the two groups but the children's median neutrophil count was lower, and their median duration of granulocytopenia before the trial was shorter. The incidence of bacteraemia was similar, but clinically documented infection was less frequent and fever of unknown origin consequently more common in children. Children developed more streptococcal bacteraemias and fewer staphylococcal bacteraemias than adults (P=0.003) but the relative incidence of various gram-negative species was similar (P=0.57). In general, the children had a better overall success rate and lower mortality than adults. Death from infection was only 1% in children versus 4% in adults (P=0.001), and time to defervescence was shorter in children. In the younger age group, univariate logistic regression models showed high temperature, prolonged neutropenia before the trial and shock as prognostic indicators for the presence of bacteraemia. Solid tumour patients were significantly less likely to have a bacteraemia. Multivariate analysis confirmed the independent prognostic value of these indicators. Using the logistic equation of the selected model, the overall discriminant ability was poor. However, it was possible to identify a small subgroup without shock or high fever and with a short prior duration of neutropenia which carries a particularly low risk of bacteraemia, who could be considered for early discharge, monotherapy and shortened courses of antibodies, in prospective trials.

Antifungal treatment in patients with cancer

Invasive fungal infections are one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. Amphotericin B deoxycholate is still considered the gold standard of antifungal therapy, although the new triazoles (itraconazole and, especially, fluconazole) have shown to be able to replace amphotericin B for some therapeutic indications. The new lipid formulations of amphotericin B have disclosed new therapeutic perspectives, especially in patients with severe renal failure and documented, infections. At this time, indications, contraindications and limitation of the various drugs in the antifungal armamentarium are still partially unclear. Antifungal prophylaxis with fluconazole may be indicated in high-risk patients, although the duration of such prophylaxis should be limited as much as possible, in order to prevent selection of resistant strains and acquired resistance. Empirical antifungal therapy is used extremely widely (maybe, too widely) in many cancer centres, despite being based on limited clinical data. For this indication, fluconazole may also be effective in patients not receiving fluconazole prophylaxis, in whom Aspergillus infection is unlikely.

International Conference for the Development of a Consensus on the Management and Prevention of Severe Candidal Infections

Because of the rapidly increasing incidence of serious candidal infections, a consensus conference of 22 investigators from the United States, Europe, and Japan was held to discuss strategies for the prevention and treatment of deep-organ infections caused by Candida species. Commonly asked questions concerning the management of candidal infections were selected for discussion by the participating investigators. Possible answers to the questions were developed by the investigators, who then voted anonymously for their preferences. In certain instances, unanimity or a strong consensus was the result. In all cases, the full spectrum of responses was recorded and is presented in this report. The forms of candidal infection addressed included candidemia, candiduria, hepatosplenic candidiasis (chronic systemic candidiasis), candidal endophthalmitis, and candidal peritonitis. Prevention and treatment strategies were considered for patients who have undergone surgery, for neutropenic and nonneutropenic patients, and for patients who have undergone bone marrow and solid organ transplantation. The therapeutic roles of amphotericin B (standard and lipid formulations) and the azoles were considered.

[Severe infections after orthotopic hepatic transplant]

METHODS

The authors analysed severe infections in 43 consecutive patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplant. Prophylaxis and full anti-infection monitoring was performed in all cases. Immunosuppressive therapy was administered in the form of primary cyclosporine in 27 cases and primary OKT3 in 16 cases.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients are still alive (median 8 months, range 2-40) and 16 died (median 22 days, range 10-92) of whom 4 without and 12 with infection, including two deaths owing to non-correlated causes with infection after recovery. Twenty-three patients underwent 33 episodes of severe infection (plus four with inconclusive positive cultures) without any case of protozoal or viral infection. All episodes occurred within two months of surgery and affected the lung (10), abdomen (7), lung + abdomen (1), urinary tract (1), lung + urinary tract (1), as well as two diffused cases and 7 cases of isolated bacteremia deriving from the donor (1), venous catheters (3), mild otorhinolaryngeal infection (1) and two unknown sources (2). Eighteen infective agents were identified in 45 cases. The bacteria involved in single-agent episodes were: 11 Gram+, 9 Gram- and five fungi. Polymicrobic and bacterial/fungal episodes were repeatedly observed in two and two cases. Postoperative renal insufficiency significantly influenced both the incidence of and mortality due to infection. Overall mortality was also influenced by early graft function, postoperative complications and reoperations, and the incidence of infections by the portal clamping stage, reject and prolonged coma.

CONCLUSIONS

The absence of severe viral infections and the gradual reduction of mortality caused by infection appear to be parallel to the aggressive antiviral prophylaxis, the gradual improvement of intra- and postoperative management and primary immunosuppression with OKT3.

Broviac catheter-related bacteraemias due to unusual pathogens in children with cancer: case reports with literature review

Among 102 episodes of intravenous catheter related bacteraemias documented between January 1989 and July 1996 in children receiving antineoplastic chemotherapy or bone marrow transplantation at G. Gaslini Children's Hospital, Genoa, Italy, were identified seven episodes due to unusual pathogens: Bacillus circulans, Bacillus licheniformis, Brevibacterium casei, Flavimonas oryzihabitans, Porphyromonas asaccharolytica, Comamonas acidovorans and Agrobacterium radiobacter. Susceptibility to different antibiotics of all strains are reported. In all cases catheter removal was required for culture negativization. All episodes were diagnosed in absence of granulocytopenia.

Fungal infections in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation: an approach to a rational management protocol

Candida sp. and Aspergillus sp. are the most common fungal pathogens causing infection in bone marrow transplant recipients and represent an increasing cause of morbidity and mortality. At this time there is no generally accepted rule for the antifungal management of these complications. Antifungal drugs in immunocompromised patients are usually administered for prophylaxis, for therapy of specific infections or for empirical or preemptive therapy. The present article reports schedules of administrations and pediatric and adult dosages of the main antifungal drugs presently available, (fluconazole, itraconazole, amphotericin B deoxycholate, lipid formulations of amphotericin B and flucytosine), together with their spectrum of action and main toxicities. Thereafter, the available information about prevention and treatment of fungal infections in bone marrow transplant recipients is summarized. Briefly, fluconazole remains the drug of choice for prevention of Candida infections in bone marrow transplant recipients, while itraconazole has been seldomly used for this indication, due to erratic oral absorption. However, new itraconazole formulations are being studied, that might disclose new clinical perspectives, due to improved bioavailability. The duration of prophylaxis is still an open issue. Resistance to the new azoles may become a problem in the near future. For this reason, it is likely that the approach to the use of these new drugs should be similar to the one commonly used for antibacterial drugs, i.e. based on pathogen-related, drug-related and host-related factors. Mainly due to lack of diagnostic tools, very little studies have been performed for prevention of aspergillosis. Available data seem to show that there might be a role for low-dose intravenous amphotericin B, which has shown to be effective for secondary prophylaxis. Itraconazole and intranasal amphotericin B have been studied, as well. Although fluconazole and itraconazole (in the rare instances in which the oral route is reliable) can also have therapeutic indications, both for empirical and for specific therapy, amphotericin B (with or without flucytosine) remains the main therapeutic option. New antifungal drugs and new supportive strategies (i.e. role of hematopoietic growth factors) are in the research pipeline and will hopefully disclose new perspectives in the near future.

Phase I study of simultaneous dose escalation and schedule acceleration of cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-etoposide using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with or without antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with small-cell lung cancer

A phase I study was designed to assess whether dose intensity of an 'accelerated' cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-etoposide (CDE) regimen plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) could be increased further, in an outpatient setting, by escalating the dose of each single drug of the regimen. Patients with previously untreated small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) received escalating doses of cyclophosphamide (C) 1100-1300 mg m-2 intravenously (i.v.) on day 1, doxorubicin (D) 50-60 mg m-2 i.v. on day 1, etoposide (E) 110-130 mg m-2 i.v. on days 1, 2, 3 and every 14 days for at least three courses. Along with chemotherapy, G-CSF (filgastrim) 5 micrograms kg-1 from day 5 to day 11 was administered subcutaneously (s.c.) to all patients. Twenty-five patients were enrolled into the study. All patients at the first dose level (C 1100, D 50, E 110 x 3) completed three or more cycles at the dose and schedule planned by the protocol and no 'dose-limiting toxicity' (DLT) was seen. At the second dose level (C 1200, D 55, E 120 x 3) three out of five patients had a DLT consisting of 'granulocytopenic fever' (GCPF). Another six patients were treated at this dose level with the addition of ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice a day and only two patients had a DLT [one episode of documented oral candidiasis and one of 'fever of unknown origin' (FUO) with generalised mucositis]. Accrual of patients proceeded to the third dose level (C 1300, D 60, E 130 x 3) with the prophylactic use of ciprofloxacin. Four out of six patients experienced a DLT consisting of GCPF or documented non-bacterial infection. Accrual of patients at the third dose level was then resumed adding to ciprofloxacin anti-fungal prophylaxis (fluconazole 100 mg daily) and anti-viral prophylaxis (acyclovir 800 mg twice a day) from day 5 to 11. Out of five patients treated three experienced a DLT consisting of severe leucopenia and fever or infection. With a simultaneous dose escalation and schedule acceleration it is indeed possible to take maximum advantage of G-CSF activity and to increase CDE dose intensity by a factor 1.65-1.80 for a maximum of 3-4 courses. The role of antimicrobial prophylaxis in this setting deserves to be investigated further.

[Sepsis related to a permanent central venous catheter in children with neoplastic disease: practical implications of a continuous surveillance of the etiology]

Indwelling central venous catheter-related bacteremias are an important complication in patients with cancer. In general they are due to Staphylococcus aureus and Candida, while bacteremias caused by Gram-negatives are less common and often related to infusate contaminans. We describe a survey of etiological surveillance of Broviac catheter-related infections at G. Gaslini Children's Hospital of Genoa, Italy. In the period 1989-1992 an increase of Broviac catheter-related bacteremias due to Gram-negatives was demonstrated as compared with previous years (1985-1988). At home parental management was suspected as an important risk factor, since this complication was frequently due to infusate contaminants and no epidemic cluster or positive surveillance culture was observed in the Hospital. Therefore at home management was changed, especially regarding heparin storage. The subsequent, prospective follow-up from July 1993 to December 1995 showed a significant decrease in catheter-related bacteremias due to Gram-negatives (P = 0.003, chi-square test). In conclusion, a strict control on at home catheter management procedures must be maintained in order to reduce the risk of indwelling central venous catheter-related infections in children with cancer.

Fluconazole versus amphotericin B as empirical antifungal therapy of unexplained fever in granulocytopenic cancer patients: a pragmatic, multicentre, prospective and randomised clinical trial

Amphotericin B, despite its intrinsic servere toxicity, is the most commonly used empirical antifungal therapy in cancer patients with unexplained fever not responding to empirical antibacterial therapy. The aim of this study was to show whether fluconazole was as effective as, and less toxic than, amphotericin, with no effort made to compare the antifungal activity of the two drugs. A group of 112 persistently febrile (> 38 degrees C) and granulocytopenic (< 1000 cells/mm3) cancer patients, not receiving any absorbable antifungal antibiotic for prophylaxis, with a mean age of 27 years (range 1-73 years), undergoing chemotherapy for a variety of malignancies and with a diagnosis of unexplained fever after at least 96 h of empirical antibacterial therapy, were randomised to receive either fluconazole (6 mg/kg/day up to 400 mg/day) or amphotericin B (0.8 mg/kg/day) as empirical antifungal treatment. Patients were required to have normal chest X-rays at randomisation, no previous history of aspergillosis and negative surveillance cultures for Aspergillus. The intention-to-treat analysis showed defervescence and survival without treatment modification in 42 of 56 patients (75%) in the fluconazole group and in 37 of 56 (66%) in the amphotericin B group (P = 0.4). Duration of therapy was 6 days (95% CI = 4-8 days) in both groups. Death occurred in 3 patients (5%) in the fluconazole and in 2 (4%) in the amphotericin B group. No fungal death was documented in either group. Adverse events developed in 18 of 56 patients (32%) in the fluconazole group and in 46 of 56 (82%) in the amphotericin B group (P < 0.001). In the amphotericin B group, 5 patients had treatment discontinued because of toxicity, versus none in the fluconazole group, a difference which approached statistical significance (P = 0.06). This study shows that fluconazole is by far less toxic than amphotericin B and suggests that it might be as effective as amphotericin B, in pragmatical terms and for this specific indication. However, numbers are too small to allow definitive conclusions about efficacy, and the use of fluconazole for this indication remains experimental. Future studies should try to identify patients more at risk of fungal infections, with the aim of individualising antifungal approaches.

Monotherapy with meropenem versus combination therapy with ceftazidime plus amikacin as empiric therapy for fever in granulocytopenic patients with cancer. The International Antimicrobial Therapy Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche Maligne dell'Adulto Infection Program

Combinations of beta-lactams plus aminoglycosides have been standard therapy for suspected infections in granulocytopenic cancer patients, especially those with profound long-lasting granulocytopenia. With the advent of new broad-spectrum bactericidal antibiotics such as extended-spectrum cephalosporins or carbapenems, the need to combine beta-lactams with aminoglycosides became more controversial. The objective of this prospective randomized multicenter study was to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerance of meropenem monotherapy with those of the combination of ceftazidime plus amikacin for the empirical treatment of fever in granulocytopenic cancer patients. Of 1,034 randomized patients, 958 were assessable in the intent-to-treat analysis for response to antibacterial therapy, including 483 in the meropenem group and 475 in the ceftazidime-plus-amikacin group. The median durations of neutropenia were 16 and 17 days, respectively. A successful outcome was reported in 270 of 483 (56%) patients treated with monotherapy compared with 245 of 475 (52%) patients treated with the combination group (P = 0.20). The success rates in the monotherapy group and the combination group were similar by type of infection (single gram-negative bacteremia, single gram-positive bacteremia, clinically documented infection, and possible infection). The occurrence of further infections assessed in patients for whom the allocated regimen was not modified did not differ between the two groups (12% in both groups). Mortality due to the presenting infection or further infection was relatively low (8 patients treated with the monotherapy compared with 13 patients treated with the combination). A total of 1,027 patients were evaluable for adverse events; the proportion of those who developed adverse effects was similar between the two groups (29% in both groups), and only 19 (4%) patients in the monotherapy group and 31 (6%) in the combination group experienced an adverse event related or probably related to the study drug. Allergic reactions were the only reason for stopping the protocol antibiotic(s) (3 and 5 patients, respectively). This study confirms that monotherapy with meropenem is as effective as the combination of ceftazidime plus amikacin for the empiric treatment of fever in persistently granulocytopenic cancer patients, and both regimens were well tolerated.