Favourable 5-year postdischarge survival of comatose patients resuscitated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, managed with immediate coronary angiogram on admission

AIMS

On-admission coronary angiogram (CA) with angioplasty (percutaneous coronary intervention, PCI) may improve survival in patients resuscitated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), but long-term survival data are scarce. We assessed long-term survival in OHCA patients managed with on-admission CA and PCI if indicated and compared survival rates in patients with/without acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

METHODS

Retrospective single-centre study including patients aged ≥18 years resuscitated from an OHCA without noncardiac cause, with sustained return of spontaneous circulation, undergoing on-admission CA with PCI if indicated. ACS was diagnosed angiographically. Survival was recorded at hospital discharge and at 5-year follow up. Survival probability was estimated by Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

RESULTS

A total of 300 comatose patients aged 56 years (IQR 48-67 years) were included, 36% with ST-segment elevation. All had on-admission CA; 31% had ACS. PCI was attempted in 91% of ACS patients and was successful in 93%. Hypothermia was performed in 84%. Survival to discharge was 32.3%. After discharge, 5-year survival was 81.7 ± 5.4%. Survival from admission to 5 years was 26.2 ± 2.8%. ACS patients had better survival to discharge (40.8%) compared with non-ACS patients (28.5%, p=0.047). After discharge, 5-year survival was 92.2 ± 5.4% for patients with ACS and 73.4 ± 8.6% without ACS (hazard ratio, HR, 2.7, 95% CI 0.8-8.9, p=0.1). Survival from admission to 5 years was 37.4 ± 5.2% for ACS patients, 20.7 ± 3.0%, for non-ACS patients (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.12-2.0, p=0.0067).

CONCLUSIONS

OHCA patients undergoing on-admission CA had a very favourable postdischarge survival. Patients with OHCA due to ACS had better survival to discharge at 5-year follow up than patients with OHCA due to other causes.

EURObservational Research Programme: regional differences and 1-year follow-up results of the Heart Failure Pilot Survey (ESC-HF Pilot)

AIMS

The ESC-HF Pilot survey was aimed to describe clinical epidemiology and 1-year outcomes of outpatients and inpatients with heart failure (HF). The pilot phase was also specifically aimed at validating structure, performance, and quality of the data set for continuing the survey into a permanent Registry.

METHODS

The ESC-HF Pilot study is a prospective, multicentre, observational survey conducted in 136 Cardiology Centres in 12 European countries selected to represent the different health systems across Europe. All outpatients with HF and patients admitted for acute HF on 1 day per week for eight consecutive months were included. From October 2009 to May 2010, 5118 patients were included: 1892 (37%) admitted for acute HF and 3226 (63%) patients with chronic HF. The all-cause mortality rate at 1 year was 17.4% in acute HF and 7.2% in chronic stable HF. One-year hospitalization rates were 43.9% and 31.9%, respectively, in hospitalized acute and chronic HF patients. Major regional differences in 1-year mortality were observed that could be explained by differences in characteristics and treatment of the patients.

CONCLUSION

The ESC-HF Pilot survey confirmed that acute HF is still associated with a very poor medium-term prognosis, while the widespread adoption of evidence-based treatments in patients with chronic HF seems to have improved their outcome profile. Differences across countries may be due to different local medical practice as well to differences in healthcare systems. This pilot study also offered the opportunity to refine the organizational structure for a long-term extended European network.

Incremental value of biomarkers to clinical variables for mortality prediction in acutely decompensated heart failure: the Multinational Observational Cohort on Acute Heart Failure (MOCA) study

AIM

This study aims to evaluate the incremental value of plasma biomarkers to traditional clinical variables for risk stratification of 30-day and one-year mortality in acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Through an international collaborative network, individual patient data on 5306 patients hospitalized for ADHF were collected. The all-cause mortality rate was 11.7% at 30 days and 32.9% at one year. The clinical prediction model (age, gender, blood pressure on admission, estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2), sodium and hemoglobin levels, and heart rate) had a c-statistic of 0.74 for 30-day mortality and 0.73 for one-year mortality. Several biomarkers measured at presentation improved risk stratification when added to the clinical model. At 30 days, the net reclassification improvement (NRI) was 28.7% for mid-regional adrenomedullin (MR-proADM; p<0.001) and 25.5% for soluble (s)ST2 (p<0.001). At one year, sST2 (NRI 10.3%), MR-proADM (NRI 9.1%), amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP; NRI 9.1%), mid-regional proatrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP; NRI 7.4%), B-type natriuretic peptide (NRI 5.5%) and C-reactive protein (CRP; NRI 5.3%) reclassified patients with ADHF (p<0.05 for all). CRP also markedly improved risk stratification of patients with ADHF as a dual biomarker combination with MR-proADM (NRI 36.8% [p<0.001] for death at 30 days) or with sST2 (NRI 20.3%; [p<0.001] for one-year mortality).

CONCLUSION

In this study, biomarkers provided incremental value for risk stratification of ADHF patients. Biomarkers such as sST2, MR-proADM, natriuretic peptides and CRP, reflecting different pathophysiologic pathways, add prognostic value to clinical risk factors for predicting both short-term and one-year mortality in ADHF.

Association between elevated blood glucose and outcome in acute heart failure: results from an international observational cohort

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this analysis was to assess the association between elevated blood glucose level and mortality in acute heart failure (AHF).

BACKGROUND

Elevated blood glucose has been reported to be prognostically meaningful in patients with cardiac diagnoses, such as coronary artery disease. The short-term prognostic impact of hyperglycemia in AHF is unknown, however.

METHODS

In a multinational cohort of AHF, we examined the ability of blood glucose concentrations at presentation to predict all-cause mortality by 30 days. Fully adjusted models for prognosis included a previous diagnosis of diabetes mellitus as a covariate.

RESULTS

A total of 6,212 subjects with AHF (mean age, 72 years; 52.5% male) were studied; the median blood glucose concentration on arrival at the hospital was 7.5 mmol/l (135 mg/dl), and 41% had a previous diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (DM). After 30 days, 618 patients (10%) had died. Compared with survivors, decedents had significantly higher median blood glucose concentrations (8.9 mmol/l vs. 7.4 mmol/l; p < 0.0001). In the fully adjusted model, an elevated blood glucose level was an independent predictor of 30-day mortality in AHF (odds ratio: 2.19; 95% confidence interval: 1.69 to 2.83; p < 0.001). The risk associated with an elevated blood glucose level appeared consistent across all subgroups of patients, including patients with preserved (hazard ratio: 5.41; 95% confidence interval: 2.44 to 12.0; p < 0.0001) and impaired systolic function (hazard ratio: 2.37; 95% confidence interval: 1.57 to 3.59; p < 0.0001). Furthermore, in reclassification analyses, elevated blood glucose added significant prognostic information to clinical parameters alone (4.4% net reclassification improvement; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with AHF, blood glucose concentrations at presentation are powerfully prognostic for 30-day mortality, independent of a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus or other clinical variables. Because blood glucose is easily modifiable, it may represent a valid target for therapeutic intervention.

Biological efficacy of twice daily aspirin in type 2 diabetic patients with coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Diabetes is associated with a high rate of events after acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention despite aspirin treatment. Once daily aspirin might not provide 24-hour stable biological efficacy in patients with diabetes. We compared the biological efficacy of the same daily dose of aspirin given either once (OPD) or divided twice per day in a population of diabetic patients with previous coronary artery disease.

METHODS

Ninety-two consecutive diabetic patients with at least 1 criteria of time-dependent aspirin efficacy, elevated high-sensibility C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), fibrinogen, platelet count, or active smoking were prospectively included. Consecutive patients were randomly treated with 150-mg aspirin daily given either OPD (150 mg in the morning) or twice per day (75 mg in the morning and 75 mg in the evening) in a crossover study. The main outcome was platelet reactivity to arachidonic acid (0.5 mg/mL) measured by light transmission aggregometry at trough level before morning aspirin intake.

RESULTS

Mean maximum aggregation intensity triggered by arachidonic acid was 19.7% ± 15.4% on OPD and 11.9% ± 10.4% on twice per day (P < .0001). Biological resistance (maximum aggregation intensity ≥20%) was observed in 42% of patients on OPD and 17% on twice per day (P < .001). Of the 39 patients with biological resistance on OPD, 24 (62%) overcame resistance on twice per day. Of the 16 resistant on twice per day, only 1 patient (6%) overcame resistance on OPD. Results were concordant with global evaluation of platelet reactivity by Platelet Function Analyzer-100. A better twice per day efficacy was independent of clopidogrel cotreatment.

CONCLUSION

In a population of diabetic patients with coronary artery disease and a high risk of time-dependent aspirin resistance, aspirin divided twice per day can significantly decrease the rate of biological loss of efficacy at trough level.

Unbiased plasma proteomics for novel diagnostic biomarkers in cardiovascular disease: identification of quiescin Q6 as a candidate biomarker of acutely decompensated heart failure

AIMS

Biochemical marker testing has improved the evaluation and management of patients with cardiovascular diseases over the past decade. Natriuretic peptides (NPs), used in clinical practice to assess cardiac dysfunction, exhibit many limitations, however. We used an unbiased proteomics approach for the discovery of novel diagnostic plasma biomarkers of heart failure (HF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A proteomics pipeline adapted for very low-abundant plasma proteins was applied to clinical samples from patients admitted with acute decompensated HF (ADHF). Quiescin Q6 (QSOX1), a protein involved in the formation of disulfide bridges, emerged as the best performing marker for ADHF (with an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.86, 95% confidence interval: 0.79-0.92), and novel isoforms of NPs were also identified. Diagnostic performance of QSOX1 for ADHF was confirmed in 267 prospectively collected subjects of whom 76 had ADHF. Combining QSOX1 to B-type NP (BNP) significantly improved diagnostic accuracy for ADHF by particularly improving specificity. Using thoracic aortic constriction in rats, QSOX1 was specifically induced within both left atria and ventricles at the time of HF onset.

CONCLUSION

The novel biomarker QSOX1 accurately identifies ADHF, particularly when combined with BNP. Through both clinical and experimental studies we provide lines of evidence for a link between ADHF and cardiovascular production of QSOX1.

[Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systemic disorder?]

When the syndrome of heart failure (HF) is due to left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction the clinical manifestations and natural history of the syndrome depend primarily on the severity of LV systolic dysfunction. In contrast, when the syndrome is attributed to LV diastolic dysfunction multiple comorbidities are responsible for the clinical manifestations and the natural history of the syndrome. The present review underscores the multifactorial pathogenesis of the syndrome of HF associated with LV diastolic dysfunction that nowadays is more properly referred to as HF with preserved LV ejection fraction (HFpEF) than to diastolic HF. The prognosis is similarly poor whether HF is due to systolic dysfunction or associated with diastolic dysfunction. The cause of death that is commonly non-cardiovascular in HFpEF supports the pathogenic importance of comorbidities in this condition. Hypertension, chronic kidney disease (CKD), diabetes, obesity and sleep disorder breathing are among the most frequent comorbidities in HFpEF. These comorbidities account for the multiple clinical presentations of the syndrome of HFpEF. Limited functional capacity is in HFpEF largely related to the downward spiral between CKD mediated fluid accumulation and LV stiffness as well as altered ventricular-vascular coupling. The diagnosis of HFpEF currently relies on 2D-Doppler echocardiography findings of impaired LV relaxation and increased LV stiffness and to a lesser extent on biomarkers. Owing to both lack of stringent inclusion and exclusion enrollment criteria and mistaken therapeutic target, placebo-controlled randomized therapeutic trials have been so far negative in HFpEF.

Left ventricle assist device: when and which patients should we refer?

Progress in the medical treatment of patients with heart failure with systolic dysfunction, cardiac resynchronization therapy, internal cardiac defibrillators and multidisciplinary management programmes has resulted in dramatic improvements in survival and quality of life; however, this progress has led to an increase in the prevalence of advanced heart failure. In the context of organ shortage for cardiac transplantation, the technological developments in left ventricular assist devices, shown in recent positive clinical studies, provide real hope for patients with advanced heart failure. This article summarizes the most recent clinical studies concerning left ventricular assist devices and discusses for whom and when a left ventricular assist device should be proposed.