Cytoplasmic BRMS1 expression in malignant melanoma is associated with increased disease-free survival

Background/aims

Breast cancer metastasis suppressor 1 (BRMS1) blocks metastasis in melanoma xenografts; however, its usefulness as a biomarker in human melanomas has not been widely studied. The goal was to measure BRMS1 expression in benign nevi, primary and metastatic melanomas and evaluate its impact on disease progression and prognosis.

Methods

Paraffin-embedded tissue from 155 primary melanomas, 69 metastases and 15 nevi was examined for BRMS1 expression using immunohistochemistry. siRNA mediated BRMS1 down-regulation was used to study impact on invasion and migration in melanoma cell lines.

Results

A significantly higher percentage of nevi (87%), compared to primary melanomas (20%) and metastases (48%), expressed BRMS1 in the nucelus (p < 0.0001). Strong nuclear staining intensity was observed in 67% of nevi, and in 9% and 24% of the primary and metastatic melanomas, respectively (p < 0.0001). Comparable cytoplasmic expression was observed (nevi; 87%, primaries; 86%, metastases; 72%). However, a decline in cytoplasmic staining intensity was observed in metastases compared to nevi and primary tumors (26%, 47%, and 58%, respectively, p < 0.0001). Score index (percentage immunopositive celles multiplied with staining intensity) revealed that high cytoplasmic score index (≥ 4) was associated with thinner tumors (p = 0.04), lack of ulceration (p = 0.02) and increased disease-free survival (p = 0.036). When intensity and percentage BRMS1 positive cells were analyzed separately, intensity remained associated with tumor thickness (p = 0.024) and ulceration (p = 0.004) but was inversely associated with expression of proliferation markers (cyclin D3 (p = 0.008), cyclin A (p = 0.007), and p21^Waf1/Cip1 (p = 0.009)). Cytoplasmic score index was inversely associated with nuclear p-Akt (p = 0.013) and positively associated with cytoplasmic p-ERK1/2 expression (p = 0.033). Nuclear BRMS1 expression in ≥ 10% of primary melanoma cells was associated with thicker tumors (p = 0.016) and decreased relapse-free period (p = 0.043). Nuclear BRMS1 was associated with expression of fatty acid binding protein 7 (FABP7; p = 0.011), a marker of invasion in melanomas. In line with this, repression of BRMS1 expression reduced the ability of melanoma cells to migrate and invade in vitro.

Conclusion

Our data suggest that BRMS1 is localized in cytoplasm and nucleus of melanocytic cells and that cellular localization determines its in vivo effect. We hypothesize that cytoplasmic BRMS1 restricts melanoma progression while nuclear BRMS1 possibly promotes melanoma cell invasion.

Please see related article: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/10/19

Clinical and biological significance of KISS1 expression in prostate cancer

For men in the United States, prostate cancer (PCa) is the most frequent malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer mortality. The metastatic spread of PCa is responsible for most deaths related to PCa. Although KISS1 functions as a metastasis suppressor in various cancers, its expression levels and functions in PCa development and progression remain undetermined. The goals of this study were to correlate the expression levels of KISS1 in PCas with clinicopathologic characteristics and to assess the biological relevance of KISS1 to the viability and motility of PCa cells. Strong KISS1 staining was detected in benign prostate tissues, but the staining was weaker in primary and metastatic PCas (both P < 0.001, t-test). Furthermore, the low expression levels of KISS1 in PCas correlated with clinical stage (P < 0.01) and with KISS1R expression (P < 0.001). Overexpression of full-length KISS1 in low KISS1-expressing PC-3M cells, but not KFMΔSS, which lacks the secretion signal sequence, induced re-sensitization of cells to anoikis, although it had no effect on either cell proliferation or apoptosis. Overexpression of KISS1 also suppressed steps in the metastatic cascade, including motility and invasiveness. Moreover, cells overexpressing KISS1 were found to enhance chemosensitivity to paclitaxel. Collectively, our data suggest that KISS1 functions as a metastasis suppressor in PCas and may serve as a useful biomarker as well as a therapeutic target for aggressive PCas.

Subsets of ATP-sensitive potassium channel (KATP) inhibitors increase gap junctional intercellular communication in metastatic cancer cell lines independent of SUR expression

Gap junctional intercellular communication (GJIC) regulates cellular homeostasis by propagating signaling molecules, exchanging cellular metabolites, and coupling electrical signals. In cancer, cells exhibit altered rates of GJIC which may play a role in neoplastic progression. K(ATP) channels help maintain membrane polarity and linkages between K(ATP) channel activity and rates of GJIC have been established. The mechanistic relationship has not been fully elucidated. We report the effects of treatment with multiple K(ATP) antagonist compounds on GJIC in metastatic cell lines demonstrating an increase in communication rates following treatment with compounds possessing specificities towards the SUR2 subunit of K(ATP). These effects remained consistent using cell lines with different expression levels of SUR1 and SUR2, suggesting possible off target effects on GJIC by these compounds.

Clinical significance of KISS1 protein expression for brain invasion and metastasis

BACKGROUND

Metastases to the brain represent a feared complication and contribute to the morbidity and mortality of breast cancer. Despite improvements in therapy, prognostic factors for development of metastases are lacking. KISS1 is a metastasis suppressor that demonstrates inhibition of metastases formation in several types of cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine the importance of KISS1 expression in breast cancer progression and the development of intracerebral lesions.

METHODS

In this study, we performed a comparative analysis of 47 brain metastases and 165 primary breast cancer specimens by using the antihuman KISS1 antibody. To compare KISS1 expression between different groups, we used a 3-tier score and the automated score computer software (ACIS) evaluation. To reveal association between mRNA and protein expression, we used quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis. Significance of immunohistochemistry stainings was correlated with clinicopathological data.

RESULTS

We identified that KISS1 expression is significantly higher in primary breast cancer compared with brain metastases (P < .05). The mRNA analysis performed on 33 selected ductal carcinoma brain metastatic lesions and 36 primary ductal carcinomas revealed a statistically significant down-regulation of KISS1 protein in metastatic cases (P = .04). Finally, we observed a significant correlation between expression of KISS1 and metastasis-free survival (P = .04) along with progression of breast cancer and expression of KISS1 in primary breast cancer specimens (P = .044).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, our study shows that breast cancer expresses KISS1. Cytoplasmic expression of KISS1 may be used as a prognostic marker for increased risk of breast cancer progression.

3,5-bis(2,4-difluorobenzylidene)-4-piperidone, a novel compound that affects pancreatic cancer growth and angiogenesis

Dysregulated Notch signaling plays an important role in the progression of cancer. Notch signaling affects tumor growth and angiogenesis through the actions of its ligand Jagged-1. In this study, we developed a novel compound 3,5-bis(2,4-difluorobenzylidene)-4-piperidone (DiFiD) and determined that it inhibits cancer cell growth and its effects on Notch signaling. Intraperitoneal administration of DiFiD significantly suppressed growth of pancreatic cancer tumor xenografts. There was a reduction in CD31-positive blood vessels, suggesting that there was an effect on angiogenesis. In vitro, DiFiD inhibited the proliferation of various human and mouse pancreatic cancer cells while increasing activated caspase-3. Cell-cycle analyses showed that DiFiD induced G(2)-M arrest and decreased the expression of cell-cycle-related proteins cyclin A1 and D1 while upregulating cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21WAF1. We next determined the mechanism of action. DiFiD reduced Notch-1 activation, resulting in reduced expression of its downstream target protein Hes-1. We further determined that the reduced Notch-1 activation was due to reduction in the ligand Jagged-1 and two critical components of the γ-secretase enzyme complex presenilin-1 and nicastrin. Ectopic expression of the Notch intracellular domain rescued the cells from DiFiD-mediated growth suppression. DiFiD-treated tumor xenografts also showed reduced levels of Jagged-1 and the γ-secretase complex proteins presenilin-1 and nicastrin. Taken together, these data suggest that DiFiD is a novel potent therapeutic agent that can target different aspects of the Notch signaling pathway to inhibit both tumor growth and angiogenesis.

Metastasis suppressor genes at the interface between the environment and tumor cell growth

The molecular mechanisms and genetic programs required for cancer metastasis are sometimes overlapping, but components are clearly distinct from those promoting growth of a primary tumor. Every sequential, rate-limiting step in the sequence of events leading to metastasis requires coordinated expression of multiple genes, necessary signaling events, and favorable environmental conditions or the ability to escape negative selection pressures. Metastasis suppressors are molecules that inhibit the process of metastasis without preventing growth of the primary tumor. The cellular processes regulated by metastasis suppressors are diverse and function at every step in the metastatic cascade. As we gain knowledge into the molecular mechanisms of metastasis suppressors and cofactors with which they interact, we learn more about the process, including appreciation that some are potential targets for therapy of metastasis, the most lethal aspect of cancer. Until now, metastasis suppressors have been described largely by their function. With greater appreciation of their biochemical mechanisms of action, the importance of context is increasingly recognized especially since tumor cells exist in myriad microenvironments. In this chapter, we assemble the evidence that selected molecules are indeed suppressors of metastasis, collate the data defining the biochemical mechanisms of action, and glean insights regarding how metastasis suppressors regulate tumor cell communication to-from microenvironments.

Abstract 965: The KISS1 metastasis suppressor appears to reverse the ‘Warburg Effect’

In 1924, Otto Warburg described the preference of cancer cells for glycolytic metabolism, even under normoxic conditions and that these metabolic changes directly correlate with malignant potential of several cancers. Although its purpose remains unclear, the “Warburg Effect” is thought to confer proliferative and survival advantages by increasing uptake of nutrients into biomass. The KISS1 metastasis suppressor protein is secreted and proteolytically cleaved into so-called kisspeptins (KP) that block the colonization of metastatic C8161.9 human melanoma cells at secondary sites. We asked whether secreted KISS1 mediates its inhibitory effects on metastatic growth through regulation of the “Warburg Effect.” Comparing multiple bioenergetic and metabolic aspects of glucose metabolism in C8161.9 ± KISS1 showed that all KISS1-secreting clones had significantly (P&lt;0.05) reduced invasion (60%) and reduced lactate production (100 mg/dL vs. 128 mg/dL). Irrespective of cell density, KISS1-expressing cells had a significantly higher extracellular pH (pHe=7.2) compared to cells transfected with empty vector or cells transfected with KISS1 harboring a deleted signal sequence (ΔSS; pHe=6.7). Utilizing a Seahorse® bioanalyzer, reduced extracellular acidification by KISS1 cells was verified concomitant with increased O2 consumption. Interestingly, mitochondrial reserve capacity, an indicator thought to reflect a cell's ability to cope with oxidative stresses, was also elevated in KISS1-expressing cells. Using mitochondrial-selective fluorescent probes, C8161.9KISS1 melanoma and MDA-MB-435KISS1 breast carcinoma cells have ∼30% more mitochondria compared to empty vector or KISS1ΔSS-expressing cells. Increased mitochondrial number in KISS1-expressing cells was correlated with higher levels of PGC-1α, a major mitochondrial biogenesis regulatory molecule, which was confirmed using siRNA to KISS1. Expression of KISS1 also protected C8161.9 cells from dichloroacetate-induced cell death. Unexpectedly, addition of KP10 to C8161.9 cells did not alter pHe, raising questions regarding the mechanism by which KISS1/KP alter PGC-1α in the absence of KISS1 receptor expression in the tumor cells. Nonetheless, these data appear to directly connect changes in mitochondrial number, metabolic pathway regulation and the metastatic process. Future studies will determine whether the increase in mitochondrial number is directly responsible for the change in glycolytic metabolism and whether these changes are necessary for KISS1's effects on metastatic growth. Support: RO1-CA134981, the National Foundation for Cancer Research, METAvivor, and UAB Med-into-Grad Fellowship.

Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 965. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-965

Abstract 1437: Coordinate regulation of miR-183-96-182 and miR10b by Breast Cancer Metastasis Suppressor 1 results in a decrease in migration and invasion of metastatic breast cancer cells

To date more than 30 metastasis suppressors have been identified by functional assays. BReast cancer Metastasis Suppressor 1 (BRMS1) suppresses metastasis of multiple tumor types by hindering the ability to colonize ectopic tissues without blocking tumorigenesis. BRMS1 interacts with SIN3:histone deacetylase complexes which can lead to metastasis suppression through epigenetic regulation of metastasis-associated gene transcription. In addition to regulating protein-coding genes (EGFR, OPN, TWIST), we showed that BRMS1 coordinately regulates metastasis-associated miRNA, e.g., increases metastasis-suppressing miRNA (miR-183-96-182, miR-146a/b, miR-335) and decreases metastasis-promoting miRNA (miR-10b, miR-373, miR-520c). We also observed significant upregulation of miR-96, which is part of the miR-183-96-182 cluster (miR-183C). In this study, we hypothesized that miR-96 could inhibit metastasis-associated processes and that restoration of miR-10b expression in BRMS1-expressing cells would restore metastatic efficiency. Over-expression of miR-96 (and individual miRNA within miR-183C) in metastatic MDA-MB-231 (231) breast cancer cells decreased invasion (∼50%) and migration (∼40%). Knockdown of individual miRNA in 231 or MDA-MB-435 (435) cells expressing BRMS1 (231B; 435B) increased motility, migration, and invasion in vitro (P&lt;0.05). Pilot in vivo metastasis assays showed a trend toward decreased metastasis with miR-183C components, but fully powered studies are underway. Re-expression of miR-10b in 231B cells partially restored motility and invasion in vitro (P&lt;0.02) but the effect on metastasis, while not statistically significant, did modestly increase. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that metastamiR are downstream mediators of BRMS1 metastasis suppression; however, coordinated expression changes are necessary to achieve significant in vivo biological effects. Given that over-expression of individual miR-183C components leads to nearly identical suppression of migration and invasion, we asked whether exogenous over-expression of one of the miR-183C miRNA affected expression of the other endogenous miR-183C miRNA (e.g., Does miR-96 over-expression change miR-182 or miR-183 expression?). Ectopic expression of individual miR-183C members led to increased expression of the other miRNA within the cluster. These findings imply feedback mechanisms for miRNA within miR-183C which may explain discordant data in other cancers where miR-183C exerted tissue-selective metastasis-promoting or -suppressing actions. The linked expression of miRNA within a cluster advise caution when designing and interpreting results from a single miRNA.

Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1437. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-1437

Abstract 1438: Breast cancer metastasis suppressor 1 (BRMS1) suppresses attachment and spreading of breast cancer cells on 2D and 3D extracellular matrix components by altering focal adhesion-associated signaling

Metastatic dissemination of cancer cells from primary tumor to secondary sites is a multi-step process that depends heavily on the ability of cancer cells to respond to the microenvironmental cues, such as changes in composition of surrounding extracellular matrix (ECM), by adapting their adhesion abilities and undergoing cytoskeletal rearrangement. Many of these interactions between cancer cells and ECM are mediated by signaling cascades initiated at the cell surface through activation of integrins and growth factor receptors. BRMS1, or Breast cancer Metastasis Suppressor 1, belongs to a family of metastasis suppressor genes and has been shown to affect several steps of the metastatic cascade. BRMS1-expressing cells shed by the primary tumor can enter the circulation and reach secondary sites, where they remain largely as single cells. Moreover, ectopic expression of BRMS1 results in a significant decrease in survival of tumor cells within blood stream, increased susceptibility to anoikis and inability to form colonies at secondary organ sites, all events that could be attributed to failure of BRMS1 expressing cells to activate integrins and strongly adhere to ECM components. Here, we show that BRMS1 expression in MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-435 cells did not significantly alter expression levels of the integrin monomers tested. However, after short-term (15-30 minutes) plating of cells onto mixed ECM or individual ECM components (collagen I, collagen IV, or fibronectin) under 2D conditions, BRMS1-expressing cells exhibited reduced activation of β1 integrin, focal adhesion kinase (FAK), and scaffolding protein Talin1, as well as a decrease in their localization to focal adhesions. Furthermore, short-term plating of BRMS1-expressing cells on collagens I or IV or fibronectin resulted in marked inhibition of cytoskeletal rearrangement and failure to form cellular adhesion projections, as compared to cells vector-transfected cells. In addition, under 3D conditions, BRMS1-expressing cells remained rounded and failed to reorganize their cytoskeleton even after 24-hour stimulation with serum. Taken together, we believe that these findings demonstrate that BRMS1-expressing breast cancer cells are inherently unable to respond to microenvironment changes, which may explain why they exhibit reduced survival in circulation, increased susceptibility to anoikis, and decreased colonization of secondary sites.

YBK was supported in part by NIH T32 (AR047512-09) and DOD CDMRP BCRP Postdoctoral Fellowship (BC096855)

Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1438. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-1438

Gli1 enhances migration and invasion via up-regulation of MMP-11 and promotes metastasis in ERα negative breast cancer cell lines

Gli1 is an established oncogene and its expression in Estrogen Receptor (ER) α negative and triple negative breast cancers is predictive of a poor prognosis; however, the biological functions regulated by Gli1 in breast cancer have not been extensively evaluated. Herein, Gli1 was over-expressed or down-regulated (by RNA interference and by expression of the repressor form of Gli3) in the ERα negative, human breast cancer cell lines MDA-MB-231 and SUM1315. Reduced expression of Gli1 in these two cell lines resulted in a decrease in migration and invasion. Gli1 over-expression increased the migration and invasion of MDA-MB-231 cells with a corresponding increase in expression of MMP-11. Silencing MMP-11 in MDA-MB-231 cells that over-expressed Gli1 abrogated the Gli1-induced enhancement of migration and invasion. Sustained suppression of Gli1 expression decreased growth of MDA-MB-231 in vitro by increasing apoptosis and decreasing proliferation. In addition, silencing of Gli1 reduced the numbers and sizes of pulmonary metastases of MDA-MB-231 in an in vivo experimental metastasis assay. In summary, Gli1 promotes the growth, survival, migration, invasion and metastasis of ERα negative breast cancer. Additionally, MMP-11 is up-regulated by Gli1 and mediates the migration and invasion induced by Gli1 in MDA-MB-231.

Protein Signatures in Human MDA-MB-231 Breast Cancer Cells Indicating a More Invasive Phenotype Following Knockdown of Human Endometase/Matrilysin-2 by siRNA

Human matrix metalloproteinase-26 (MMP-26/endometase/matrilysin-2) is a putative biomarker for carcinomas of breast, prostate, and other cancers of epithelial origin. MMP-26 expression was silenced using small interfering RNA (siRNA) in the human breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231. Immunological and proteomics approaches, including two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, were employed to identify differential protein expression in MMP-26 knockdown cells. A comparison of the protein expression profiles of control and MMP-26 knockdown cells revealed nine differentially regulated proteins. Five of the proteins (heat shock protein 90, glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78), annexin V, tropomyosin, and peroxiredoxin II) were up-regulated, while alpha-tubulin, cystatin SA-III, breast cancer metastasis suppressor 1 (BRMS1) and beta-actin were down-regulated. This decrease of BRMS1 expression is concomitant with an increase of invasion through matrix-coated membranes. These results suggest an important role for MMP-26 in the regulation of proteins involved in invasive and metastatic breast cancers.

Metastasis suppressors and the tumor microenvironment

The most lethal and debilitating attribute of cancer cells is their ability to metastasize. Throughout the process of metastasis, tumor cells interact with other tumor cells, host cells and a variety of molecules. Tumor cells are also faced with a number of insults, such as hemodynamic sheer pressure and immune selection. This brief review explores how metastasis suppressor proteins regulate interactions between tumor cells and the microenvironments in which tumor cells find themselves.

Homotypic gap junctional communication associated with metastasis suppression increases with PKA activity and is unaffected by PI3K inhibition

Loss of gap junctional intercellular communication (GJIC) between cancer cells is a common characteristic of malignant transformation. This communication is mediated by connexin proteins that make up the functional units of gap junctions. Connexins are highly regulated at the protein level and phosphorylation events play a key role in their trafficking and degradation. The metastasis suppressor breast cancer metastasis suppressor 1 (BRMS1) upregulates GJIC and decreases phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K) signaling. On the basis of these observations, we set out to determine whether there was a link between PI3K and GJIC in tumorigenic and metastatic cell lines. Treatment of cells with the well-known PI3K inhibitor LY294002, and its structural analogue LY303511, which does not inhibit PI3K, increased homotypic GJIC; however, we found the effect to be independent of PI3K/AKT inhibition. We show in multiple cancer cell lines of varying metastatic capability that GJIC can be restored without enforced expression of a connexin gene. In addition, while levels of connexin 43 remained unchanged, its relocalization from the cytosol to the plasma membrane was observed. Both LY294002 and LY303511 increased the activity of protein kinase A (PKA). Moreover, PKA blockade by the small molecule inhibitor H89 decreased the LY294002/LY303511-mediated increase in GJIC. Collectively, our findings show a connection between PKA activity and GJIC mediated by PI3K-independent mechanisms of LY294002 and LY303511. Manipulation of these signaling pathways could prove useful for antimetastatic therapy.

KISS1 over-expression suppresses metastasis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in a xenograft mouse model

Identifying molecular targets for treatment of pancreatic cancer metastasis is critical due to the high frequency of dissemination prior to diagnosis of this lethal disease. Because the KISS1 metastasis suppressor is expressed at reduced levels in advanced pancreatic cancer, we hypothesized that re-expression of KISS1 would reduce metastases. Highly metastatic S2VP10 cells expressing luciferase (S2VP10L) were transfected with a FLAG-tagged version of KISS1 (KFM), KFMΔSS (with deleted secretion signal sequence), or pcDNA3 control plasmid (CP) and expression was confirmed by RTQ-PCR. SCID mice were implanted orthotopically with S2VP10L cells or transfectants and tumor growth and metastases were monitored using bioluminescence imaging. Mice with S2VP10L-KISS1 tumors developed fewer liver (98%) and lung (99%) metastases than S2VP10L. Unexpectedly, mice with S2VP10L-KFMΔSS tumors also had reduced liver and lung metastases, but had more metastases than mice with S2VP10L-KISS. KISS1 protein was found in the cytoplasm of both KFMΔSS and KISS1-expressing orthotopic tumors by immunohistochemistry. Metastases were not found in lungs of mice with S2VP10L-KISS1 tumors; whereas, KFMΔSS lung sections had regions of concentrated KISS1 staining, suggesting that secretion of KISS1 is needed to reduce metastasis significantly. These data suggest induction of KISS1 expression has potential as an adjuvant treatment for pancreatic cancer.

Formation of field-reversed-configuration plasma with punctuated-betatron-orbit electrons

We describe ab initio, self-consistent, 3D, fully electromagnetic numerical simulations of current drive and field-reversed-configuration plasma formation by odd-parity rotating magnetic fields (RMF{o}). Magnetic-separatrix formation and field reversal are attained from an initial mirror configuration. A population of punctuated-betatron-orbit electrons, generated by the RMF{o}, carries the majority of the field-normal azimuthal electrical current responsible for field reversal. Appreciable current and plasma pressure exist outside the magnetic separatrix whose shape is modulated by the RMF{o} phase. The predicted plasma density and electron energy distribution compare favorably with RMF{o} experiments.

Abstract 484: Treatment strategy to reverse osteolytic breast cancer metastasis using osteoblasts in a murine xenograft model

The most common site of breast cancer metastasis is bone. The majority of these metastases are osteolytic, characterized by an increase in bone degradation via an upregulation of osteoclast activity. These effects lead to complications including fracture, contractile pain and hypercalcemia, significantly reducing the quality of life in these patients. The role of bone forming osteoblasts at sites of osteolytic lesions is less understood. We have recently shown that breast cancer cells are capable of inducing apoptosis of osteoblasts in vitro as well as in vivo using murine xenograft models. This effect would further exacerbate osteolytic disease, and may explain why treatment strategies capable of inhibiting osteolysis (bisphosphonates) are not capable of repairing lost bone. We hypothesize that modulating the number of osteoblasts at sites of osteolytic metastases, may aid in the repair of resorbed bone. To provide proof-of-principle evidence, we have engineered the murine pre-osteoblast cell line, MC3T3-E1, to overexpress Bcl2, conferring resistance to apoptosis. These cells will be used with an in vivo model of osteolysis using GFP-labeled breast cancer cells previously reported by our laboratory. Apoptosis resistant MC3T3-E1 will be injected into bone both before, and after induction of osteolysis and rates of bone resorption and repair will be measured. The results of this project will provide the first in vivo evidence that restoration of osteoblasts at sites of osteolytic metastases can aid in the repair of lost bone and will test for the first time, experimental manipulation of osteoblast number and function in osteolytic breast cancer metastasis.

Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 484.

Abstract 1057: BRMS1 restoration of gap junctional intercellular communication involves modulation of KATP channels and downregulation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)

Metastatic disease remains the most lethal aspect of cancer, accounting for over 90% of cancer related mortality. Breast Cancer Metastasis Suppressor 1 (BRMS1) specifically inhibits the ability of tumor cells to metastasize to secondary sites while having little or no affect on primary tumor growth. Clinically, a loss of BRMS1 mRNA expression in breast cancer patients is correlated with poor prognosis and a decrease in BRMS1 protein levels predicts reduced disease free survival. The mechanisms of BRMS1 remain unclear; however expression of BRMS1 significantly decreases the PI3K signaling pathway, a pathway that is often over activated in cancer cells. PI3K is a lipid kinase that phosphorylates phosphatidylinositol (4,5)-bisphosphate (PtdIns(4,5)P2) to PtdIns(3,4,5)P3, leading to downstream signaling. BRMS1 acts to reduce the substrate of PI3K, PtdIns(4,5)P2, by &gt;90% when expressed in metastatic cells. Re-expression of BRMS1 in cancer cell lines also restores gap junctional intercellular communication (GJIC), a process that mediates cellular homeostasis and is often lost during neoplastic progression. GJIC has been shown to be affected by PI3K; thus we hypothesized that inhibition of PI3K signaling by BRMS1 might be responsible for the restoration of GJIC. In support of this, treatment with the PI3K inhibitor LY294002 (10µM) in vector control and parental cell lines from multiple cancer cell types, mimicked the effects of BRMS1 on GJIC. Interestingly, inhibition of signaling molecules further downstream of PI3K (AKT, mTOR) did not produce the same effect, suggesting the mechanism of action may directly involve the ratio of PtdIns(4,5)P2/PtdIns(3,4,5)P3. We show that alterations in an ATP dependent potassium channel, KATP, regulated by phosphoinositides, is responsible for the changes in GJIC observed by BRMS1 expression. Delineation of this mechanism will allow for in vivo analysis to determine if changes in GJIC are causative for the BRMS1 mediated suppression of metastasis. Taken together, our data suggest an inhibitory mechanism on gap junctional communication mediated by PI3K, that is relieved by restoration of BRMS1 expression.

Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1057.

The KISS1 metastasis suppressor: a good night kiss for disseminated cancer cells

Re-expression of KISS1 in tumor cell lines allows all antecedent steps of metastasis, but prevents colonization of secondary sites. Because tumor cells have already disseminated by the time of cancer diagnosis, KISS1 may represent a new opportunity for therapeutic intervention. Moreover, numerous clinical reports demonstrate that a loss or reduction of KISS1 expression in different human cancers inversely correlates with tumor progression, metastasis, and survival. Taken together, these observations compel the hypothesis that KISS1 could be of tremendous utility in controlling metastasis in a therapeutic context. In this review, we highlight some key findings from preclinical and clinical studies and discuss strategies whereby KISS1 may be exploited clinically to treat metastases.

Fully kinetic particle-in-cell simulations of a deuterium gas puff z pinch

We present the first fully kinetic, collisional, and electromagnetic simulations of the complete time evolution of a deuterium gas puff z pinch. Recent experiments with 15-MA current pinches have suggested that the dominant neutron-production mechanism is thermonuclear. We observe distinct differences between the kinetic and magnetohydrodynamic simulations in the pinch evolution with the kinetic simulations producing both thermonuclear and beam-target neutrons. The kinetic approach demonstrated in this Letter represents a viable alternative for performing future plasma physics calculations.

Free fatty acids enhance breast cancer cell migration through plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and SMAD4

Obesity is a risk factor for breast cancer and is associated with increased plasma concentrations of free fatty acids (FFAs). We and others have demonstrated that FFA induces plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) expression in a variety of cells. Emerging evidence supports elevation of PAI-1 as a prognostic marker for breast cancer. Therefore, we hypothesized that FFAs might increase expression of PAI-1 in breast cancer cells and facilitate breast cancer progression. Secreted PAI-1 was higher in invasive and metastatic MDA-MB-231 cells compared with less invasive and non-metastatic Hs578T cells. Utilizing FFAs with different saturation and chain lengths, we demonstrated that linoleic acid induced expression of PAI-1 in MDA-MB-231 cells. Linoleic acid also induced in vitro migration of MDA-MB-231. By contrast, other FFAs tested had little or no effect on PAI-1 expression or migration. Linoleic acid-induced breast cancer cell migration was completely inhibited by virally expressed antisense PAI-1 RNA. Furthermore, increased expression of PAI-1 by FFAs was not detected in the SMAD4-deficient MDA-MB-468 breast carcinoma cells. Electrophoretic mobility-shift assay confirmed that linoleic acid-induced expression of PAI-1 was mediated, at least in part, by SMAD4 in MDA-MB-231 cells. That linoleic acid induces PAI-1 expression in breast cancer cells through SMAD4 provides a novel insight into understanding the relationships between two migration-associated molecules, FFAs, and PAI-1.

Metastamir: the field of metastasis-regulatory microRNA is spreading

Despite advancements in knowledge from more than a century of metastasis research, the genetic programs and molecular mechanisms required for cancer metastasis are still incompletely understood. Genes that specifically regulate the process of metastasis are useful tools to elucidate molecular mechanisms and may become markers and/or targets for antimetastatic therapy. Recently, several noncoding regulatory RNA genes, microRNA (miRNA), were identified, which play roles in various steps of metastasis, some without obvious roles in tumorigenesis. Understanding how these metastasis-associated miRNA, which we term metastamir, are involved in metastasis will help identify possible biomarkers or targets for the most lethal attribute of cancer: metastasis.

Breast cancer metastasis suppressor 1 coordinately regulates metastasis-associated microRNA expression

Breast cancer metastasis suppressor 1 (BRMS1) suppresses metastasis of multiple tumor types without blocking tumorigenesis. BRMS1 forms complexes with SIN3, histone deacetylases and selected transcription factors that modify metastasis-associated gene expression (e.g., EGFR, OPN, PI4P5K1A, PLAU). microRNA (miRNA) are a recently discovered class of regulatory, noncoding RNA, some of which are involved in neoplastic progression. Based on these data, we hypothesized that BRMS1 may also exert some of its antimetastatic effects by regulating miRNA expression. MicroRNA arrays were done comparing small RNAs that were purified from metastatic MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-435 and their nonmetastatic BRMS1-transfected counterparts. miRNA expression changed by BRMS1 were validated using SYBR Green RT-PCR. BRMS1 decreased metastasis-promoting (miR-10b, -373 and -520c) miRNA, with corresponding reduction of their downstream targets (e.g., RhoC which is downstream of miR-10b). Concurrently, BRMS1 increased expression of metastasis suppressing miRNA (miR-146a, -146b and -335). Collectively, these data show that BRMS1 coordinately regulates expression of multiple metastasis-associated miRNA and suggests that recruitment of BRMS1-containing SIN3:HDAC complexes to, as yet undefined, miRNA promoters might be involved in the regulation of cancer metastasis.

Linking metastasis suppression with metastamiR regulation

Cancer metastasis requires the coordinate expression of multiple genes during every step of the metastatic cascade. Molecules that regulate these genetic programs have the potential to impact metastasis at multiple levels. Breast cancer metastasis suppressor 1 (BRMS1) suppresses metastasis by inhibiting multiple steps in the cascade through regulation of many protein-encoding, metastasis-associated genes as well as metastasis-regulatory microRNA, termed metastamiR. In this Feature , we will highlight connections between BRMS1 biology and regulation of metastamiR.

A shift from nuclear to cytoplasmic breast cancer metastasis suppressor 1 expression is associated with highly proliferative estrogen receptor-negative breast cancers

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To determine breast cancer metastasis suppressor 1 (BRMS1) expression in breast cancers and the efficacy of BRMS1 as a prognostic indicator, BRMS1 expression was assessed in two sets of breast cancer tissues.

METHODS

Epithelial cells from 36 frozen samples of breast cancers and corresponding normal breast were collected by laser capture microdissection and assessed for BRMS1 by quantitative RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry. BRMS1 was also evaluated by immunohistochemistry in a tissue microarray of 209 breast cancers and correlated with indicators of prognosis [estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), ErbB2, p53, p27(Kip1), Bcl2 and Ki-67].

RESULTS

BRMS1 mRNA and protein were higher in 94 and 81%, respectively, of breast cancers than in corresponding normal epithelium. BRMS1 localization was predominantly nuclear, but 60-70% of cancers also exhibited cytoplasmic immunostaining. Breast cancers with lower nuclear than cytoplasmic BRMS1 (nuclear score - cytoplasmic score < or =0; 11% of cancers) had lower ER, lower PR and higher Ki-67 expression. There was also a trend toward poorer overall survival in this group of cancers, but this was only of borderline significance (p = 0.073). In Cox proportional hazards models, loss of nuclear BRMS1 was not a significant predictor of overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Loss of nuclear BRMS1 was associated with ER-negative cancers and a high rate of proliferation, but was not an independent indicator of prognosis.