Low-grade serous ovarian cancer: State of the science

In January 2019, a group of basic, translational, and clinical investigators and patient advocates assembled in Miami, Florida, to discuss the current state of the science of low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum-a rare ovarian cancer subtype that may arise de novo or following a diagnosis of serous borderline tumor. The purpose of the conference was to review current knowledge, discuss ongoing research by established researchers, and frame critical questions or issues for future directions. Following presentations and discussions, the primary objective was to initiate future collaborations, uniform database platforms, laboratory studies, and clinical trials to better understand this disease and to advance clinical care outside the boundaries of single academic institutions. This review summarizes the state of the science in five principal categories: epidemiology and patient outcomes, pathology, translational research, patient care and clinical trials, and patients' perspective.

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and optimal interval tumor reductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVES

Intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and interval tumor reductive surgery (TRS) for advanced ovarian cancer is feasible, however, the impact on disease outcomes remains unclear. We compare outcomes of patients treated with IP chemotherapy versus intravenous (IV) chemotherapy following NACT and interval TRS.

METHODS

In this retrospective review, patients with advanced ovarian cancer were included if they received NACT followed by optimal interval TRS between 1/2004 and 4/2017. Patients were excluded if they had an ECOG PS >1, received >6 cycles of NACT or postoperative chemotherapy, and/or received bevacizumab during primary therapy. Primary outcomes were progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

There were 134 patients included in this study, 37 (28%) received IP and 97 (72%) received IV chemotherapy postoperatively. Patients in the IV group were older (median 66.3 vs 59.7 years, p = 0.0039) though there were no differences in BMI, race, BRCA status, stage, or histology. Median PFS was 3 months longer in the IP group (14.5 versus 11.5 months, p = 0.028) however there was no significant difference in OS. On univariate analysis, increasing number of NACT cycles (HR 1.914, 95% CI 1.024-3.497) and residual disease at completion of TRS (HR 1.541, 95% CI 1.042-2.248) were associated with decreased PFS; IP chemotherapy was associated with increased PFS (HR 0.633, 95% CI 0.414-0.944). These associations remained on multivariate analysis. Toxicity was comparable between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

IP after NACT and optimal interval TRS was associated with in improved PFS compared to IV chemotherapy without significant differences in toxicity.

Outcomes of secondary cytoreductive surgery for patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Most women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer develop recurrent disease, despite maximal surgical cytoreduction and adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. In observational studies, secondary cytoreductive surgery has been associated with improved survival; however its use is controversial, because there are concerns that the improved outcomes may reflect selection bias rather than the superiority of secondary surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the overall survival of women with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer treated at National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers who receive secondary surgery vs chemotherapy.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study included women from 6 National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers diagnosed with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2011. The primary outcome was overall survival. Propensity score matching was used to compare similar women who received secondary surgery vs chemotherapy. Additional analyses examined how these findings may be influenced by the prevalence of unobserved confounders at the time of recurrence.

RESULTS

Among 626 women, 146 (23%) received secondary surgery and 480 (77%) received chemotherapy. In adjusted analyses, patients who received secondary surgery were younger (P = 0.001), had earlier-stage disease at diagnosis (P = 0.002), and had longer disease-free intervals (P < 0.001) compared with those receiving chemotherapy. In the propensity score-matched groups (n = 244 patients), the median overall survival was 54 months in patients who received secondary surgery and 33 months in those treated with chemotherapy (P < 0.001). Among patients who received secondary surgery, 102 (70%) achieved optimal secondary cytoreduction. There were no significant differences in complication rates between the 2 groups. In sensitivity analyses, the survival advantage associated with secondary surgery could be explained by the presence of more multifocal recurrences (if 4.3 times more common), ascites (if 2.7 times more common), or carcinomatosis (if 2.1 times more common) among patients who received chemotherapy instead of secondary surgery.

CONCLUSION

Patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer who received secondary surgery had favorable surgical characteristics and were likely to have minimal residual disease following secondary surgery. These patients had a superior median overall survival compared with patients who received chemotherapy, although unmeasured confounders may explain this observed difference.

Abstract GMM-048: CTDNA RESPONSE TO THE PARP INHIBITOR RUCAPARIB PREDICTS PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL AND BEST OVERALL RESPONSE ON THE ARIEL2 TRIAL

BACKGROUND: High grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) is characterized by ubiquitous TP53 mutation and has the highest genomic complexity of all epithelial neoplasms. Sensitivity to PARP inhibitor therapy is strongly associated with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). Genomic biomarkers of HRD such as genome-wide loss of heterozygosity (LOH) scores predict HRD and response to rucaparib. We hypothesized that functional testing of response during PARP inhibitor treatment using changes in circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) could improve prediction of patient outcome. We tested whether the change in ctDNA TP53 mutant allele fraction (MAF) after one cycle of rucaparib treatment was predictive of progression free survival (PFS) and response in patients from the phase 2 ARIEL2 trial in women with platinum-sensitive recurrent high grade ovarian cancer (NCT01891344).

METHODS: We analyzed serial plasma samples (n = 636) from 142 HGSOC patients during screening, on day 1 of each treatment cycle, and at the end of rucaparib treatment. Targeted amplicon deep sequencing (TADS) of TP53 was performed on DNA extracted from plasma (median depth 6916×). Somatic TP53 mutation and loss of heterozygosity score (LOH) were available from archival and biopsy specimens. Statistical analyses were pre-specified and ctDNA analysis was carried out blinded to visit and response data. TP53 MAF changes after one cycle of treatment were compared with PFS and best overall response assessed by RECIST v1.1 and GCIG CA-125 criteria. Optimal cut points for ctDNA response were determined using a cross-validation analysis. In cases with &gt;1 TP53 mutation, response assessment was performed using the mutation with highest MAF.

RESULTS: We detected TP53 mutations in plasma from 134 patients; all cases were concordant between tumour and plasma except for one patient (present in plasma but not tumour). In 18 patients (13%), 2 or more TP53 mutations were detected in ctDNA. The median TP53 MAF prior to cycle 1 was 2.6% (IQR 0.3–8.6). Reduction of &gt;70% of TP53 MAF in ctDNA between cycle 1 and 2 was significantly predictive of improved PFS (n = 97; HR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.34-0.85, p = 0.008, median 273 vs 158 days, sensitivity 76%, specificity 62%) and best overall response (n = 97; OR = 7.04, 95% CI 2.69–21.06, p &lt; 0.001). Combining ctDNA and LOH scores did not improve prediction of response.

CONCLUSIONS

Response measured by &gt;70% fall in TP53 ctDNA between pre-cycle 1 and pre-cycle 2 of rucaparib therapy was significantly associated with best overall response and improved PFS. Similar findings were observed in a retrospective study of recurrent HGSOC treated with standard of care chemotherapy. The pathological or genomic factors causing multiple TP53 mutations in ctDNA are unknown.

The association between early fall in ctDNA and validated RECIST and CA-125 response markers provides strong evidence that ctDNA may have utility for detecting early response to targeted therapy. Further analyses in randomized studies should be performed to confirm that ctDNA response has strong predictive value.

Citation Format: Anna Piskorz, David Robertson, Kevin K. Lin, James Morris, Elaina Mann, Amit Oza, Robert L. Coleman, David M. O'Malley, Michael Friedlander, Janiel M. Cragun, Ling Ma, Heidi Giordano, Iain A. McNeish, Elizabeth Swisher, James Wason, James D. Brenton. CTDNA RESPONSE TO THE PARP INHIBITOR RUCAPARIB PREDICTS PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL AND BEST OVERALL RESPONSE ON THE ARIEL2 TRIAL [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 12th Biennial Ovarian Cancer Research Symposium; Sep 13-15, 2018; Seattle, WA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2019;25(22 Suppl):Abstract nr GMM-048.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy plus Radiation for Locally Advanced Endometrial Cancer

BACKGROUND

Stage III or IVA endometrial cancer carries a significant risk of systemic and locoregional recurrence.

METHODS

In this randomized phase 3 trial, we tested whether 6 months of platinum-based chemotherapy plus radiation therapy (chemoradiotherapy) is associated with longer relapse-free survival (primary end point) than six cycles of combination chemotherapy alone in patients with stage III or IVA endometrial carcinoma. Secondary end points included overall survival, acute and chronic toxic effects, and quality of life.

RESULTS

Of the 813 patients enrolled, 736 were eligible and were included in the analysis of relapse-free survival; of those patients, 707 received the randomly assigned intervention (346 received chemoradiotherapy and 361 received chemotherapy only). The median follow-up period was 47 months. At 60 months, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of patients alive and relapse-free was 59% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53 to 65) in the chemoradiotherapy group and 58% (95% CI, 53 to 64) in the chemotherapy-only group (hazard ratio, 0.90; 90% CI, 0.74 to 1.10). Chemoradiotherapy was associated with a lower 5-year incidence of vaginal recurrence (2% vs. 7%; hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.82) and pelvic and paraaortic lymph-node recurrence (11% vs. 20%; hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.66) than chemotherapy alone, but distant recurrence was more common in association with chemoradiotherapy (27% vs. 21%; hazard ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.86). Grade 3, 4, or 5 adverse events were reported in 202 patients (58%) in the chemoradiotherapy group and 227 patients (63%) in the chemotherapy-only group.

CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy plus radiation was not associated with longer relapse-free survival than chemotherapy alone in patients with stage III or IVA endometrial carcinoma. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00942357.).

A phase I study of veliparib incorporated into front-line platinum based cheotherpy and bevacizumab in epithelial ovarian cancer (NCT00989651): A GOG/nrg trial

5523

Background: Veliparib, a poly-(ADP-ribose)-polymerase inhibitor, increases anti-tumor activity when combined with platinum chemotherapy and has monotherapy activity in BRCA deficient tumors. This study was done to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of veliparib in combination with front line treatment for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Methods: Eligible patients had newly diagnosed, stage II-IV EOC. Six regimens were evaluated, 3 variations of chemo delivery with either continuous (D1-21) or intermittent (days-2-5) veliparib BID. Chemo included 1: IV q3week carboplatin (C) (AUC 6) and paclitaxel(T) (175mg/m2); 2, IV q3week C (AUC 6) and weekly T(80mg/m2); and 3, IV T (135mg/m2, day 1), IP cisplatin (75mg/m2, day 1 or 2) and IP T (60mg/m2, day 8). Bevacizumab 15mg/kg started cycle 2 and continued as monotherapy cycles 7-22. A 3+3 dose escalation design evaluated dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in cycles 1 and 2. Once < 2/6 patients experienced a DLT, that dose level was expanded to evaluate feasibility over 4 cycles. Results: The study accrued 424 treated patients. For regimen 1, continuous (Reg1c) the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 250mg veliparib BID but the feasible dose was found to be 150mg BID. For regimen 1, intermittent (Reg1i) the MTD and feasible dose were 400 and 250mg BID respectively. For Reg2c the MTD and feasible dose were the same at 150mg BID. For Reg2i the MTD and feasible dose were 250 and 150mg BID respectively. For Reg3c the MTD and feasible dose are both 150mg BID and for Reg3i, the MTD was 400mg BID and the feasible dose felt to be 300mg BID. Median PFS by residual disease and BRCA status is: (Positive residual disease) 14.6, 19.1 and 16.9 months for BRCA+, BRCAwt and BRCA ukn respectively. For no gross residual disease the PFS is NR, 34.2 and 24.5 months respectively. Conclusions: Given the difficulty with toxicity not defined as a DLT, the RP2D for all regimens is veliparib 150mg BID. This data informed the dose that moved into the phase III trial GOG 3005/Velia: NCT02470585. Velia also incorporated maintenance veliparib instead of maintenance bevacizumab among all high grade serous patients (BRCA+ and wt). These results will determine utilization of veliparib in this space. Clinical trial information: NCT00989651.

Sex hormone, insulin, and insulin-like growth factor signaling in recurrence of high stage endometrial cancer: Results from the NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group 210 trial

5509

Background: Sex hormone and insulin/insulin-like growth factor (IGF) axis signaling pathways play an important role in endometrial cancer development but their role in endometrial cancer recurrence is unknown. In this study GOG-8015 we evaluated these pathways in a prospective cohort of patients diagnosed with the most common type of endometrial cancer, endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Methods: Stage II-IV endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma patients (N = 816) enrolled in the GOG-210 study with pre-treatment specimens were tested for tumor mRNA and protein expression levels of IGF1, IGF2, IGF binding proteins ( IGFBP) -1and -3, the insulin (IR) and IGF-I receptors (IGF1R), and phosphorylated (activated) IR/IGF1R as well as estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptors (PR) using quantitative PCR and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Serum concentrations of insulin, IGF-I, IGFBP-3, estradiol, estrone and sex hormone binding globulin were measured using ELISAs. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for risk of recurrence were obtained from multivariable Cox proportional hazard’s models with adjustment for age, stage and grade. Results: Recurrence occurred in 280 (34%) cases during a mean of 5.4 years of follow-up. ER-positivity (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.47-0.95), IR-positivity (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.29-0.98) and serum IGF-I levels (highest versus lowest quartile, HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.47-0.92) were inversely associated with recurrence risk. Conversely, circulating estradiol (highest versus lowest tertile, HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.02-2.36) and insulin (per 10 uU/ml, HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.12-2.06) and phosphorylated IGF1R/pIR expression (HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.02-1.92) were associated with increased risk of recurrence. Conclusions: We identified novel sex hormone and insulin/IGF axis tissue and circulating biomarkers of recurrence in a prospective study of high stage endometrioid endometrial cancer. Circulating insulin and estradiol, and tissue phosphorylated (activated) IGR1R/IR were independently associated with recurrence. These findings support prioritizing studies to establish their clinical utility as prognostic biomarkers and to investigate new strategies that target these pathways for prevention and treatment of endometrial cancer recurrence.

Exploratory analysis of the effect of maintenance rucaparib on postprogression outcomes in patients (pts) with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian carcinoma (OC) and updated safety data from the phase 3 study ARIEL3

5522

Background: In ARIEL3, rucaparib maintenance treatment significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs placebo in all predefined, nested cohorts: BRCA mutation; BRCA mutation + wild-type BRCA/high loss of heterozygosity (LOH); and intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Methods: Pts were randomized 2:1 to receive oral rucaparib 600 mg BID or placebo. Exploratory endpoints of time to first subsequent therapy (TFST), time to investigator-assessed PFS on the subsequent line of treatment or death (PFS2), and time to second subsequent therapy (TSST) were assessed in the predefined cohorts. Results: Exploratory efficacy endpoint data are given in the Table. As of Dec 31, 2017, the most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any grade (rucaparib vs placebo) were nausea (75.8% vs 36.5%), asthenia/fatigue (70.7% vs 44.4%), dysgeusia (39.8% vs 6.9%), and anemia/decreased hemoglobin (39.0% vs 5.3%). The most common grade ≥3 TEAEs were anemia/decreased hemoglobin (21.5% vs 0.5%) and alanine/aspartate aminotransferase increase (10.2% vs 0.0%). Conclusions: Rucaparib significantly improved the clinically meaningful endpoints TFST, PFS2, and TSST vs placebo in all predefined cohorts of pts with platinum-sensitive, recurrent OC. The updated safety profile was consistent with prior reports. Clinical trial information: NCT01968213. [Table: see text]

Mirvetuximab soravtansine, a folate receptor alpha (FRα)-targeting antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), in combination with bevacizumab in patients (pts) with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: Final findings from the FORWARD II study

5520

Background: Mirvetuximab soravtansine is an ADC comprising a FRα-binding antibody, cleavable linker, and the maytansinoid DM4, a potent tubulin-targeting agent. As part of the Phase 1b FORWARD II trial (NCT02606305), the combination of mirvetuximab soravtansine with bevacizumab (BEV) was evaluated in pts with FRα-positive, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (recurrence within 6 months after last platinum). Methods: Pts received mirvetuximab soravtansine (6 mg/kg; adjusted ideal body weight) and BEV (15 mg/kg) on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle. Responses were assessed according to RECIST 1.1 and adverse events (AEs) evaluated by CTCAE v4.03. Results: In total, 66 pts received combination dosing at this level: 11 during escalation and 55 in expansion. The median age was 63 years, pts received a median of 3 prior lines of systemic therapy (range 1-8), and 62% had received prior therapy with BEV. The most common AEs were diarrhea (58%), nausea (50%), and blurred vision (48%), and were primarily low grade (≤ grade 2). Serious AEs were largely gastrointestinal in nature, with small intestinal obstruction the most frequent individual event (4 pts, 6%). Objective responses were seen in 27 pts for a confirmed overall response rate (ORR) of 41% (95% CI, 29, 54), median progression-free survival (mPFS) interval of 7.1 months (95% CI, 4.9, 9.5), and median duration of response (mDOR) of 8.6 months (95% CI, 4.9, 14.9). In a subset analysis of pts (n = 16) who were bevacizumab-naïve, had 1-2 prior therapies, and medium/high FRα levels (i.e., ≥ 50% of cells with at least moderate staining intensity) the ORR was 56% (95% CI, 30, 80), mPFS 9.9 months (95% CI, 4.1, 15.9), and mDOR 12 months (95% CI, 6.0, 14.9). Conclusions: The combination of mirvetuximab soravtansine with BEV exhibits favorable tolerability in pts with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, characterized by a manageable side-effect profile. The encouraging efficacy compares favorably to reported outcomes for BEV and chemotherapy seen in similar patient populations. These data support continued exploration of the combination in ovarian cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT02606305.

Feasibility of text-based symptom monitoring of ovarian and endometrial patients during treatment

e18299

Background: Unreported symptoms during cancer treatment can lead to poorer patient care and quality of life. Newer technology enables effective means to track patients’ health in real time. We evaluated the feasibility of implementing systematic patient symptom monitoring during the first 12 months after diagnosis. Methods: Newly diagnosed endometrial and ovarian cancer patients were enrolled post-surgically to respond to monthly text message symptom surveys. Patients’ fatigue, sleep quality, pain, and quality of life during the past 7 days were rated on a 0 (worst) -10 (best) scale, and depressive symptoms were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Patients’ responses were captured in REDCap and monitored by program staff, with patients’ oncologists receiving monthly feedback. Patient navigators were also engaged for patients needing assistance during treatment. We provide the results of the first 6 months of this program. Results: 134 patients were approached, and 120 patients (ovarian [n = 70] and endometrial [n = 50]) were enrolled among 5 physicians. The mean participant age was 63 (range: 35-87), 85% were non-Hispanic White, and 66% had education beyond high school. The most commonly reported monthly symptoms for both cancer types were moderate levels (scores of ≥ 4-7) of fatigue and sleep disturbance. 35 patients with PHQ-9 scores ≥ 10 and/or with suicidal ideation were reported to their oncologists for appropriate follow-up. At the 6 month survey, patients were asked to evaluate the text messaging program: 97% found the symptom surveys easy to complete on their smart phone or computer; 77% believed reporting their symptoms monthly was useful all or most of the time; 78% liked being monitored for symptoms all or most of the time; and 89% liked being asked if they needed any assistance prior to their next clinic visit. Patient navigators were used by 13 patients, and 17 patients dropped from the program over the 6 months due to death (n = 9) or lack of need/interest (n = 8). Average monthly compliance was 81%. Conclusions: We established the feasibility of enrolling patients in a monthly text-based monitoring program to facilitate symptom management during treatment. Patient follow-up is continuing.

Phase 2 trial of tisotumab vedotin in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (innovaTV 208)

TPS5602

Background: Ovarian cancer (OC) is the most lethal gynecologic cancer, accounting for ≈185,000 deaths worldwide in 2018. Most patients (pts) initially respond to platinum-based chemotherapy (chemo), but more than 50% of pts recur. Pts who recur in ≤6 months have platinum-resistant OC (PROC), which is associated with poor prognosis. Standard therapy for PROC includes chemo ± bevacizumab (bev). However, many pts receive single-agent chemo, which demonstrates limited response and survival (≈12% ORR, 3-4 mo PFS, ≈12 mo OS). Therefore, there is an urgent need for novel therapeutic strategies. Tissue factor (TF) is a novel oncogenic target expressed in OC. Tisotumab vedotin (TV) is a first-in-class antibody drug conjugate comprising a TF-targeted fully human monoclonal antibody conjugated to the microtubule-disrupting agent monomethyl auristatin E. TV has shown encouraging antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in PROC in the multicohort phase 1/2 innovaTV 201 study. innovaTV 208 is a multicenter, open-label, phase 2 trial with a safety run-in phase for a dose-dense regimen (DDR) evaluating the efficacy and safety of TV in pts with PROC. Methods: innovaTV 208 will enroll ≈142 adult pts with platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer; measurable disease by RECIST v1.1; and ECOG score 0-1. Eligible pts must have received bev-containing treatment for OC. Pts with platinum-refractory disease, increased risk of bleeding, active ocular surface disease, or grade > 1 peripheral neuropathy will be excluded. A safety run-in phase for the DDR will be performed in up to 12 pts who received ≤5 prior treatment regimens for PROC. In the DDR, TV will be given at previously decided lower doses IV 3Q4W for the same dose intensity as the standard 1Q3W dose; the primary endpoint is incidence of DLTs. In phase 2, pts who received ≤1 prior cytotoxic chemo regimen for PROC will be randomized to receive TV administered as IV 1Q3W or as IV 3Q4W, if shown to be tolerable. The primary endpoint for phase 2 is confirmed ORR by RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints include DOR, time to response, DCR, CA-125 response rate by GCIG criteria, PFS, OS, pharmacokinetics, and safety. Clinical trial information: NCT03657043.

Trebananib or placebo plus carboplatin and paclitaxel as first-line treatment for advanced ovarian cancer (TRINOVA-3/ENGOT-ov2/GOG-3001): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Angiopoietin 1 and 2 regulate angiogenesis and vascular remodelling by interacting with the tyrosine kinase receptor Tie2, and inhibition of angiogenesis has shown promise in the treatment of ovarian cancer. We aimed to assess whether trebananib, a peptibody that inhibits binding of angiopoietin 1 and 2 to Tie2, improved progression-free survival when added to carboplatin and paclitaxel as first-line therapy in advanced epithelial ovarian, primary fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer in a phase 3 clinical trial.

METHODS

TRINOVA-3, a multicentre, multinational, phase 3, double-blind study, was done at 206 investigational sites (hospitals and cancer centres) in 14 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with biopsy-confirmed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III to IV epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancers, and an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (2:1) using a permuted block method (block size of six patients) to receive six cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m²) and carboplatin (area under the serum concentration-time curve 5 or 6) every 3 weeks, plus weekly intravenous trebananib 15 mg/kg or placebo. Maintenance therapy with trebananib or placebo continued for up to 18 additional months. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, as assessed by the investigators, in the intention-to-treat population. Safety analyses included patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01493505, and is complete.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 30, 2012, and Feb 25, 2014, 1164 patients were screened and 1015 eligible patients were randomly allocated to treatment (678 to trebananib and 337 to placebo). After a median follow-up of 27·4 months (IQR 17·7-34·2), 626 patients had progression-free survival events (405 [60%] of 678 in the trebananib group and 221 [66%] of 337 in the placebo group). Median progression-free survival did not differ between the trebananib group (15·9 months [15·0-17·6]) and the placebo group (15·0 months [12·6-16·1]) groups (hazard ratio 0·93 [95% CI 0·79-1·09]; p=0·36). 512 (76%) of 675 patients in the trebananib group and 237 (71%) of 336 in the placebo group had grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse events; of which the most common events were neutropenia (trebananib 238 [35%] vs placebo 126 [38%]) anaemia (76 [11%] vs 40 [12%]), and leucopenia (81 [12%] vs 35 [10%]). 269 (40%) patients in the trebananib group and 104 (31%) in the placebo group had serious adverse events. Two fatal adverse events in the trebananib group were considered related to trebananib, paclitaxel, and carboplatin (lung infection and neutropenic colitis); two were considered to be related to paclitaxel and carboplatin (general physical health deterioration and platelet count decreased). No treatment-related fatal adverse events occurred in the placebo group.

INTERPRETATION

Trebananib plus carboplatin and paclitaxel did not improve progression-free survival as first-line treatment for advanced ovarian cancer. The combination of trebananib plus carboplatin and paclitaxel did not produce new safety signals. These results show that trebananib in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel is minimally effective in this patient population.

FUNDING

Amgen.

BRCA Reversion Mutations in Circulating Tumor DNA Predict Primary and Acquired Resistance to the PARP Inhibitor Rucaparib in High-Grade Ovarian Carcinoma

A key resistance mechanism to platinum-based chemotherapies and PARP inhibitors in BRCA-mutant cancers is the acquisition of BRCA reversion mutations that restore protein function. To estimate the prevalence of BRCA reversion mutations in high-grade ovarian carcinoma (HGOC), we performed targeted next-generation sequencing of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) extracted from pretreatment and postprogression plasma in patients with deleterious germline or somatic BRCA mutations treated with the PARP inhibitor rucaparib. BRCA reversion mutations were identified in pretreatment cfDNA from 18% (2/11) of platinum-refractory and 13% (5/38) of platinum-resistant cancers, compared with 2% (1/48) of platinum-sensitive cancers (P = 0.049). Patients without BRCA reversion mutations detected in pretreatment cfDNA had significantly longer rucaparib progression-free survival than those with reversion mutations (median, 9.0 vs. 1.8 months; HR, 0.12; P < 0.0001). To study acquired resistance, we sequenced 78 postprogression cfDNA, identifying eight additional patients with BRCA reversion mutations not found in pretreatment cfDNA. SIGNIFICANCE: BRCA reversion mutations are detected in cfDNA from platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory HGOC and are associated with decreased clinical benefit from rucaparib treatment. Sequencing of cfDNA can detect multiple BRCA reversion mutations, highlighting the ability to capture multiclonal heterogeneity.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 151.

How safe is rucaparib in ovarian cancer?

Introduction: Rucaparib is increasingly being utilized for women with recurrent ovarian cancer both as treatment and maintenance therapy. Poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors like rucaparib are daily oral medication that exploit the DNA repair pathway. The most significant clinical benefit is in those tumors exhibiting deficiency in their homologous recombination pathway. Areas covered: This review will discuss the mechanism of action, clinical efficacy data, and safety of rucaparib as presented from phase 1, 2, and 3 clinical trials. Expert opinion: Rucaparib is a promising therapeutic option for women where prolongation of survival with favorable side effects is the goal. The side effect profile of rucaparib is similar or more favorable when evaluating it against other PARP inhibitors. Physicians will likely need to have increasing comfort with unique side effects like transaminitis and serum creatinine increases. Clinicians should be prepared for not only increasing utilization of PARP inhibitors in the recurrent setting but also upfront usage may be on the horizon. As >50% of high grade serous ovarian cancers likely have the predictive biomarker, HRD, for PARP inhibition a substantial group of patients stand to have PARP inhibitors as part of their oncologic care.

Time to chemotherapy in ovarian cancer: Compliance with ovarian cancer quality indicators at a National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center

OBJECTIVE

To assess compliance with, and outcomes related to, the Society of Gynecologic Oncology quality measure in ovarian cancer to administer chemotherapy within 42 days of cytoreductive surgery in patients with epithelial ovarian/fallopian tube/peritoneal cancer.

METHODS

Institutional ovarian cancer database was evaluated for compliance with the quality measure to administer chemotherapy within 42 days of cytoreductive surgery. The influence of chemotherapy timing on the risk of death was evaluated, and factors related to the timing of chemotherapy after surgery was assessed.

RESULTS

Of 668 patients with epithelial ovarian/fallopian tube/peritoneal cancer who underwent surgical treatment for their disease (primary or interval), 635 met criteria for administration of adjuvant chemotherapy (with stages IA/IB, grade 2 or 3 disease; stage IC or more advanced stage disease). Compliance to administer chemotherapy within 42 days was 59.1%. The adjusted risk of death was not strongly associated with time to chemotherapy within 42 days (aHR: 0.80; 0.61, 1.05) and this did not differ by primary or interval debulking surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospectively maintained database, 59.1% of patients received chemotherapy within 42 days of surgery. The time to chemotherapy interval of within 42 days was not strongly associated with improved survival, particularly when age, stage of disease, insurance enrollment and surgical characteristics were taken into account. Further, the relationship between time to chemotherapy interval of within 42 days and survival did not vary by patients who received primary versus interval debulking surgery or had no residual disease.

BRCA Reversion Mutations in Circulating Tumor DNA Predict Primary and Acquired Resistance to the PARP Inhibitor Rucaparib in High-Grade Ovarian Carcinoma

A key resistance mechanism to platinum-based chemotherapies and PARP inhibitors in BRCA-mutant cancers is the acquisition of BRCA reversion mutations that restore protein function. To estimate the prevalence of BRCA reversion mutations in high-grade ovarian carcinoma (HGOC), we performed targeted next-generation sequencing of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) extracted from pretreatment and postprogression plasma in patients with deleterious germline or somatic BRCA mutations treated with the PARP inhibitor rucaparib. BRCA reversion mutations were identified in pretreatment cfDNA from 18% (2/11) of platinum-refractory and 13% (5/38) of platinum-resistant cancers, compared with 2% (1/48) of platinum-sensitive cancers (P = 0.049). Patients without BRCA reversion mutations detected in pretreatment cfDNA had significantly longer rucaparib progression-free survival than those with reversion mutations (median, 9.0 vs. 1.8 months; HR, 0.12; P < 0.0001). To study acquired resistance, we sequenced 78 postprogression cfDNA, identifying eight additional patients with BRCA reversion mutations not found in pretreatment cfDNA. SIGNIFICANCE: BRCA reversion mutations are detected in cfDNA from platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory HGOC and are associated with decreased clinical benefit from rucaparib treatment. Sequencing of cfDNA can detect multiple BRCA reversion mutations, highlighting the ability to capture multiclonal heterogeneity.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 151.

Does adjuvant chemotherapy dose modification have an impact on the outcome of patients diagnosed with advanced stage ovarian cancer? An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study

PURPOSE

To determine the relationship between chemotherapy dose modification (dose adjustment or treatment delay), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for women with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) and primary peritoneal carcinoma (PPC) who receive carboplatin and paclitaxel.

METHODS

Women with stages III and IV EOC and PPC treated on the Gynecologic Oncology Group phase III trial, protocol 182, who completed eight cycles of carboplatin with paclitaxel were evaluated in this study. The patients were grouped per dose modification and use of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). The primary end point was OS; Hazard ratios (HR) for PFS and OS were calculated for patients who completed eight cycles of chemotherapy. Patients without dose modification were the referent group. All statistical analyses were performed using the R programming language and environment.

RESULTS

A total of 738 patients were included in this study; 229 (31%) required dose modification, 509 did not. The two groups were well-balanced for demographic and prognostic factors. The adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for disease progression and death among dose-modified patients were: 1.43 (95% CI, 1.19-1.72, P < 0.001) and 1.26 (95% CI, 1.04-1.54, P = 0.021), respectively. Use of G-CSF was more frequent in dose-modified patients with an odds ratio (OR) of 3.63 (95% CI: 2.51-5.26, P < 0.001) compared to dose-unmodified patients.

CONCLUSION

Dose-modified patients were at a higher risk of disease progression and death. The need for chemotherapy dose modification may identify patients at greater risk for adverse outcomes in advanced stage EOC and PPC.

A phase II study of frontline paclitaxel/carboplatin/bevacizumab, paclitaxel/carboplatin/temsirolimus, or ixabepilone/carboplatin/bevacizumab in advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

Paclitaxel and carboplatin (PC) is a standard initial therapy for advanced endometrial cancer. We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of incorporating three novel agents into initial therapy.

METHODS

In this randomized phase II trial, patients with chemotherapy-naïve stage III/IVA (with measurable disease) and stage IVB or recurrent (with or without measurable disease) endometrial cancer were randomly assigned to treatment with PC plus bevacizumab (Arm 1), PC plus temsirolimus (Arm 2) or ixabepilone and carboplatin (IC) plus bevacizumab (Arm 3). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Comparable patients on the PC Arm of trial GOG209 were used as historical controls. Secondary endpoints were response rate, overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

Overall, 349 patients were randomized. PFS duration was not significantly increased in any experimental arm compared with historical controls (p > 0.039). Treatment HRs (92% CI) for Arms 1, 2, and 3 relative to controls were 0.81 (0.63-1.02), 1.22 (0.96-1.55) and 0.87 (0.68-1.11), respectively. Response rates were similar across arms (60%, 55% and 53%, respectively). Relative to controls, OS duration (with censoring at 36 months), was significantly increased in Arm 1 (p < 0.039) but not in Arms 2 and 3; the HRs (92% CIs) were 0.71 (0.55-0.91), 0.99 (0.78-1.26), and 0.97 (0.77-1.23), respectively. No new safety signals were identified. Common mutations and rates of mismatch repair protein loss are described by histotype. Potential predictive biomarkers for temsirolimus and bevacizumab were identified.

CONCLUSION

PFS was not significantly increased in any experimental arm compared to historical controls. NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Study GOG-86P.

Abstract CT172: A phase 2 multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safety using autologous tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (LN-145) in patients with recurrent metastatic or persistent cervical carcinoma

Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) may be effective in treating immunogenic tumors with high mutational load, such as melanoma, and virally-associated tumors, like cervical cancer, with several patients in studies performed at various institutions achieving durable, complete responses for years. HPV infection increases mutational load, thus providing additional neoantigen targets ideal for the polyclonal nature of ACT. As outcomes for patients with recurrent, metastatic or persistent cervical cancer remain extremely poor, there is an enormous need for novel immunotherapeutic approaches with curative potential such as ACT.

Clinical trial C-145-04 (NCT03108495) is a prospective, phase II multicenter, open-label study evaluating the efficacy of a single autologous tumor infiltrating lymphocyte infusion (LN-145) followed by IL-2 after a non-myeloablative lymphodepletion (NMA-LD) regimen in patients with recurrent, metastatic, or persistent cervical cancer, who have failed at least one prior systemic therapy. The clinical trial requires resection of an adequate size tumor lesion, which is then shipped to a central GMP manufacturing facility for tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) extraction, expansion, and preparation of the final infusion product (LN-145). One week prior to LN-145 shipment and infusion, patients undergo NMA-LD consisting of cyclophosphamide (60 mg/kg) daily x 2 days followed by fludarabine (25 mg/m2) daily x 5 days. LN-145 is infused 24 hours after the last dose of fludarabine followed by up to 6 doses of IL-2 (600,000 IU/kg) every 8-12 hours. The primary endpoint is the ORR per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints include complete response, duration of response, disease control rate, progression free- and overall survival and safety. Patients must, in addition to the tumor targeted for excision for TIL manufacture, have an additional measurable lesion for assessment of response. Other major eligibility criteria include: adequate bone marrow, liver, pulmonary, cardiac and renal function; ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. Systemic steroids greater than 10 mg/day prednisone equivalents are prohibited as are a history of serious immunotherapy-related adverse events.

Citation Format: Amir Jazaeri, Robert Edwards, Robert Wenham, Koji Matsuo, Gini F. Fleming, David M. O'Malley, Brian Slomovitz, Bradley Monk, Robert J. Brown, Sam Suzuki, Igor Gorbatchevsky, Maria Fardis, Emese Zsiros. A phase 2 multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safety using autologous tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (LN-145) in patients with recurrent metastatic or persistent cervical carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT172.