Loss of DPC4/SMAD4 expression in primary gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors is associated with cancer-related death after resection

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors have frequent loss of DPC4/SMAD4 expression, a known tumor suppressor. The impact of SMAD4 loss on gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors aggressiveness or cancer-related patient outcomes is not defined. We examined the expression of SMAD4 in resected gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors and its impact on oncologic outcomes.

METHODS

Patients who underwent complete curative operative resection of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors were identified retrospectively (n = 38). Immunohistochemical staining for SMAD4 expression was scored by a blinded pathologist and correlated with clinicopathologic features and oncologic outcomes.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine percent of the gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors were SMAD4-negative and 71% SMAD4-positive. Median overall survival was 155 months (95% confidence interval, 102-208 months). Loss of SMAD4 was associated with both decreased median disease-free survival (28 months; 95% confidence interval, 16-40) months compared with 223 months (95% confidence interval, 3-443 months) for SMAD4-positive patients (P = .03) and decreased median disease-specific survival (SMAD4: 137 [95% confidence interval, 81-194] months versus SMAD4-positive: 204 [95% confidence interval, 143-264] months; P = .04). This translated into a decrease in median overall survival (SMAD4-negative: 125 (95% confidence interval, 51-214) months versus SMAD4-positive: 185 (95% confidence interval, 138-232) months; P = .02).

CONCLUSION

Consistent with the known biology of the DPC4/SMAD4 gene, an absence of its protein expression in primary gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors was negatively associated with outcomes after curative operative resection.

Everolimus for the Treatment of Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Overall Survival and Circulating Biomarkers From the Randomized, Phase III RADIANT-3 Study

Purpose Everolimus improved median progression-free survival by 6.4 months in patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NET) compared with placebo in the RADIANT-3 study. Here, we present the final overall survival (OS) data and data on the impact of biomarkers on OS from the RADIANT-3 study. Methods Patients with advanced, progressive, low- or intermediate-grade pancreatic NET were randomly assigned to everolimus 10 mg/day (n = 207) or placebo (n = 203). Crossover from placebo to open-label everolimus was allowed on disease progression. Ongoing patients were unblinded after final progression-free survival analysis and could transition to open-label everolimus at the investigator's discretion (extension phase). OS analysis was performed using a stratified log-rank test in the intent-to-treat population. The baseline levels of chromogranin A, neuron-specific enolase, and multiple soluble angiogenic biomarkers were determined and their impact on OS was explored. Results Of 410 patients who were enrolled between July 2007 and March 2014, 225 received open-label everolimus, including 172 patients (85%) randomly assigned initially to the placebo arm. Median OS was 44.0 months (95% CI, 35.6 to 51.8 months) for those randomly assigned to everolimus and 37.7 months (95% CI, 29.1 to 45.8 months) for those randomly assigned to placebo (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.20; P = .30). Elevated baseline chromogranin A, neuron-specific enolase, placental growth factor, and soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 levels were poor prognostic factors for OS. The most common adverse events included stomatitis, rash, and diarrhea. Conclusion Everolimus was associated with a median OS of 44 months in patients with advanced, progressive pancreatic NET, the longest OS reported in a phase III study for this population. Everolimus was associated with a survival benefit of 6.3 months, although this finding was not statistically significant. Crossover of patients likely confounded the OS results.

Utility of chromogranin A, pancreatic polypeptide, glucagon and gastrin in the diagnosis and follow-up of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 patients

OBJECTIVE

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PNETs) are the major source of disease-specific mortality in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) patients. Chromogranin A (CgA), pancreatic polypeptide (PP), glucagon and gastrin have some diagnostic value in sporadic PNETs, but there is very little evidence for their efficacy in diagnosing PNETs in MEN1 patients.

DESIGN

We performed a retrospective chart review of the existing MEN1 database in our institution.

PATIENTS

One hundred and thirteen patients were eligible for diagnostic value analysis of tumour markers. Patients were excluded if measurement of tumour markers was missing, either 3 months prior to PNET diagnosis (PNET patients) or prior to abdominal imaging (non-PNET patients).

MEASUREMENTS

Clinicopathologic characteristics and of tumour marker measurements were analysed.

RESULTS

Of 293 confirmed MEN1 cases, 55 PNETs and 58 non-PNETs met inclusion criteria. The area under the curve (AUC) for CgA, PP, glucagon and gastrin in MEN1 cases was 59·5%, 64·1%, 77·0% and 75·9%, respectively. The AUC for the combination of CgA, PP and gastrin was 59·6%. PP, but not CgA, glucagon or gastrin was significantly associated with both age and PNET functional status (P = 0·0485 and 0·0188, respectively). No markers were significantly associated with sex, PNET size, tumour number, tumour location, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, presence of lymph node metastasis, lymphovascular invasion or overall survival. CgA values were not significantly lower following PNET resection than pre-operatively (P = 0·554).

CONCLUSIONS

The value of blood markers for diagnosing PNETs in MEN1 patients is relatively low, even when used in combination.

Everolimus for the treatment of advanced, non-functional neuroendocrine tumours of the lung or gastrointestinal tract (RADIANT-4): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study

BACKGROUND

Effective systemic therapies for patients with advanced, progressive neuroendocrine tumours of the lung or gastrointestinal tract are scarce. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of everolimus compared with placebo in this patient population.

METHODS

In the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 RADIANT-4 trial, adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with advanced, progressive, well-differentiated, non-functional neuroendocrine tumours of lung or gastrointestinal origin were enrolled from 97 centres in 25 countries worldwide. Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio by an interactive voice response system to receive everolimus 10 mg per day orally or identical placebo, both with supportive care. Patients were stratified by tumour origin, performance status, and previous somatostatin analogue treatment. Patients, investigators, and the study sponsor were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by central radiology review, analysed by intention to treat. Overall survival was a key secondary endpoint. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01524783.

FINDINGS

Between April 3, 2012, and Aug 23, 2013, a total of 302 patients were enrolled, of whom 205 were allocated to everolimus 10 mg per day and 97 to placebo. Median progression-free survival was 11·0 months (95% CI 9·2-13·3) in the everolimus group and 3·9 months (3·6-7·4) in the placebo group. Everolimus was associated with a 52% reduction in the estimated risk of progression or death (hazard ratio [HR] 0·48 [95% CI 0·35-0·67], p<0·00001). Although not statistically significant, the results of the first pre-planned interim overall survival analysis indicated that everolimus might be associated with a reduction in the risk of death (HR 0·64 [95% CI 0·40-1·05], one-sided p=0·037, whereas the boundary for statistical significance was 0·0002). Grade 3 or 4 drug-related adverse events were infrequent and included stomatitis (in 18 [9%] of 202 patients in the everolimus group vs 0 of 98 in the placebo group), diarrhoea (15 [7%] vs 2 [2%]), infections (14 [7%] vs 0), anaemia (8 [4%] vs 1 [1%]), fatigue (7 [3%] vs 1 [1%]), and hyperglycaemia (7 [3%] vs 0).

INTERPRETATION

Treatment with everolimus was associated with significant improvement in progression-free survival in patients with progressive lung or gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumours. The safety findings were consistent with the known side-effect profile of everolimus. Everolimus is the first targeted agent to show robust anti-tumour activity with acceptable tolerability across a broad range of neuroendocrine tumours, including those arising from the pancreas, lung, and gastrointestinal tract.

FUNDING

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.

Octreotide LAR Dosage and Survival Among Elderly Patients With Distant-Stage Neuroendocrine Tumors

INTRODUCTION

Octreotide long-acting repeatable (LAR) is approved for the management of carcinoid syndromes and may improve progression-free survival of patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). It is unknown whether the dosage of octreotide LAR affects survival. This paper evaluates the association between initial octreotide LAR dosage and overall survival of elderly patients with NETs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with distant-stage NET diagnosed between January 1999 and December 2009 who received octreotide LAR treatment within 12 months of diagnosis were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. Those under age 65 years, enrolled in health maintenance organizations, or without continuous enrollment in Medicare Parts A and B were excluded. We compared the 5-year survival of patients with NET based on dose per 28 days averaged over the initial 3 months: low (≤20 mg); medium (21-30 mg); high (>30 mg). Kaplan-Meier estimations and Cox proportional hazard modeling were used to examine the association between octreotide LAR dose and survival.

RESULTS

Among 222 patients with distant-stage NET who received octreotide LAR treatment, 81 (36%) received a low dosage, 82 (37%) received a medium dosage, and only 59 (27%) received a high dosage. Multivariate analysis showed that compared with a medium octreotide LAR dose, a low dosage was associated with significantly worse survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.00; p = .001), whereas a high initial dosage (HR: 1.09; p = .719) did not show additional survival benefits over that observed with a medium dosage.

CONCLUSION

This population-based study suggests potential survival benefits for octreotide LAR provided within 12 months of diagnosis at a dosage of 21-30 mg among elderly patients with distant-stage NET.

Phase II trial of bevacizumab and erlotinib as a second-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Trial registry

Clinicaltrials.gov #NCT01180959.

Background

Early clinical studies of bevacizumab and erlotinib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have a tolerable toxicity and a promising clinical outcome. We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of this combination as a second-line therapy for HCC refractory to sorafenib.

Methods

For this single-arm, Phase II study, we recruited patients with Child–Pugh class A or B liver disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–2, and advanced HCC that was not amenable to surgical or regional therapies and treatment with sorafenib had failed (disease progressed or patient could not tolerate sorafenib). Patients received 10 mg/kg intravenous bevacizumab every 14 days and 150 mg oral erlotinib daily for 28-day cycles until progression. Tumor response was evaluated every two cycles using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. The primary end point was the 16-week progression-free survival rate. Secondary end points included time to progression and overall survival.

Results

A total of 44 patients were enrolled and had a median follow-up time of 33.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 23.5 months – not defined). The 16-week progression-free survival rate was 43% (95% CI: 28%–59%), median time to progression was 3.9 months (95% CI: 2.0–8.3 months), and median overall survival duration was 9.9 months (95% CI: 8.3–15.5 months). Grade 3–4 adverse events included fatigue (13%), acne (11%), diarrhea (9%), anemia (7%), and upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (7%).

Conclusion

Bevacizumab plus erlotinib was tolerable and showed a signal of survival benefit in the second-line setting for patients with advanced HCC. Because standard-of-care options are lacking in this setting, further studies to identify predictors of response to this regimen are warranted.

Yttrium-90 resin microspheres as an adjunct to sorafenib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Purpose

The safety and efficacy of the combined use of sorafenib and yttrium-90 resin microspheres (Y90 RMS) to treat advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is not well established. We determined the incidence of adverse events with this combination therapy in patients with advanced HCC at our institution and analyzed the treatment and survival outcomes.

Materials and methods

We reviewed the records of 19 patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer class B or C HCC who underwent treatment with Y90 RMS (for 21 sessions) while receiving full or reduced doses of sorafenib between January 2008 and May 2010. Therapy response was evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. We evaluated median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) as well as hepatic and extrahepatic disease PFS and incidence of adverse events.

Results

The median patient age was 67 years, and portal or hepatic venous invasion was present in eight patients (42%). Ten patients received reduced doses of sorafenib. The median Y90 radiation activity delivered was 41.2 mCi. The partial response of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors was observed in four patients (19%). The median hepatic disease PFS was 7.82 months, extrahepatic disease PFS was 8.94 months, OS was 19.52 months, and PFS was 6.63 months. Ninety days after treatment with Y90 RMS, five patients (26%) had grade II adverse events and four patients (21%) had grade III adverse events.

Conclusion

OS and PFS outcomes were superior to those observed in prior studies evaluating sorafenib alone in patients with a similar disease status, warranting further study of this treatment combination.

[177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]-octreotate in the treatment of midgut neuroendocrine tumors

Midgut neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are relatively rare and remarkably heterogeneous. Although recent developments for pancreatic NETs have brought multiple new therapies to patients who need them, there has been little observed efficacy against midgut NETs. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy utilizes somatostatin analogs conjugated to radioactive isotopes in order to deliver high doses of radiation directly to tumor cells, which express somatostatin receptors. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with [(177)Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]-octreotate (DOTATATE) has been reported and investigated for more than a decade, and the randomized controlled NETTER-1 study of this agent has recently been reported to show promising results. In this article, we will summarize and evaluate the rationale and existing clinical data for the activity of DOTATATE in midgut NETs, to give context for the interpretation of NETTER-1 results when they are fully available.

Efficacy and safety of everolimus in advanced, progressive, nonfunctional neuroendocrine tumors (NET) of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and unknown primary: A subgroup analysis of the phase III RADIANT-4 trial

315

Background: In the groundbreaking, phase 3 RCT RADIANT-4 study, everolimus (EVE) significantly prolonged median progression-free survival (PFS) by 7.1 mo in patients (pts) with advanced, progressive, nonfunctional NET of GI or lung vs placebo (PBO); HR, 0.48 (95%CI, 0.35-0.67), P<0.00001 [Yao JC et al, ECC-ESMO, 2015]. Methods: InRADIANT-4, pts with advanced, progressive, well-differentiated (G1/G2), nonfunctional GI or lung NET were randomized (2:1) to EVE (10 mg/d) or PBO. In this analysis, pts with NET of GI tract (stomach, colon, rectum, appendix, caecum, ileum, duodenum, jejunum, or small intestine) and unknown primary were included. Results: Of 302 pts, 175 had GI NET (EVE [n=118], PBO [n=57]); 36 had NET of unknown primary (EVE [23], PBO [13]). In GI NET pts, median age was 63 y; females: 55%; G1/G2: 75%/25%; WHO PS: 0, 78% or 1, 22%; Caucasian: 73%. Similar baseline characteristics were observed in pts with NET of unknown primary. Ileum (41%), rectum (23%) and jejunum (13%) were the most common locations in GI subgroup. The table below lists prior treatments. In pts with GI NET, median PFS (95% CI) by central review (EVE vs PBO) was 13.1 (9.2-17.3) mo vs 5.4 (3.6-9.3) mo with an estimated 44% risk-reduction in favor of EVE (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.37-0.84). In pts with NET of unknown primary, median PFS (95% CI) by central review (EVE vs PBO) was 13.6 (4.1-not evaluable) mo vs 7.5 (1.9-18.5) mo (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.24-1.51). The most frequent G3/4 adverse events irrespective of drug-relationship reported in ≥5% pts in GI subgroup were diarrhea, hypertension, stomatitis, abdominal pain, fatigue, and acute renal failure. Conclusions: The present subgroup analysis of RADIANT-4 study demonstrated improvement in PFS with EVE for pts with GI NET, and suggests efficacy in NET of unknown primary, with an estimated 40% to 44% risk-reduction in favor of EVE vs PBO. Safety profile for EVE is consistent with that previously reported. Clinical trial information: NCT01524783. [Table: see text]

High-Grade Neuroendocrine Colorectal Carcinomas: A Retrospective Study of 100 Patients

BACKGROUND

Colorectal high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas (HGNEC) are a rare but aggressive group of malignancies without standard management recommendations.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 100 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed colorectal HGNEC diagnosed at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 1991 and 2013.

RESULTS

In our cohort, most tumors (89%) were small cell carcinoma, and most (60%) involved the sigmoid or the anorectal regions. Sixty-four patients (64%) presented with metastatic disease at diagnosis. Striking epidemiological and clinical differences between those established in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and our cohort were noted, including significantly lower rates of smoking and lower risk of bone, brain metastases. Over 30% of the tumors were found associated with an adenoma. Median overall survival (OS) of the cohort was 14.7 months, with 2-year and 5-year OS rates of 23% and 8%, respectively. In patients with localized disease, multimodality therapy was associated with a trend toward improved median OS (20.4 vs. 15.4 months; P = .08). Metastases at presentation (OS 20.63 vs. 8.7 months; localized vs metastatic disease at presentation; P < .001) and elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels were strongly associated with a worse outcome.

CONCLUSION

In comparison to SCLC, less than half of the patients with colorectal HGNEC have history of smoking; metastatic patterns are also different between the 2 cancers. Nevertheless, HGNEC also has an aggressive biology, with the rectum being the most common site of origin. For localized disease, a multimodality approach seems to be associated with better outcomes, while systemic chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for advanced disease.

Efficacy of octreotide long-acting repeatable in neuroendocrine tumors: RADIANT-2 placebo arm post hoc analysis

Somatostatin analogues (SSA) have demonstrated antiproliferative activity in addition to efficacy for carcinoid symptom control in functional neuroendocrine tumors (NET). A post hoc analysis of the placebo arm of the RAD001 In Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors-2 (RADIANT-2) study was conducted to assess the efficacy of octreotide long-acting repeatable (LAR) on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Out of 213 patients randomized to placebo plus octreotide LAR in RADIANT-2, 196 patients with foregut, midgut, or hindgut NET were considered for present analysis. Of these, 41 patients were SSA-treatment naïve and 155 had received SSA therapy before study entry. For SSA-naïve patients, median PFS by adjudicated central review was 13.6 (95% CI 8.2-22.7) months. For SSA-naïve patients with midgut NET (n=24), median PFS was 22.2 (95% CI 8.3-29.5) months. For patients who had received SSA previously, the median PFS was 11.1 (95% CI 8.4-14.3) months. Among the SSA-pretreated patients who had midgut NET (n=119), the median PFS was 12.0 (95% CI 8.4-19.3) months. Median OS was 35.8 (95% CI 32.5-48.9) months for patients in the placebo plus octreotide LAR arm; 50.6 (36.4 - not reached) months for SSA-naïve patients and 33.5 (95% CI 27.5-44.7) months for those who had received prior SSA. This post hoc analysis of the placebo arm of the large phase 3 RADIANT-2 study provides data on PFS and OS among patients with progressive NET treated with octreotide therapy.

Neuroendocrine tumors, version 1.2015

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) comprise a broad family of tumors that may or may not be associated with symptoms attributable to hormonal hypersecretion. The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Neuroendocrine Tumors discuss the diagnosis and management of both sporadic and hereditary NETs. This selection from the guidelines focuses on sporadic NETs of the pancreas, gastrointestinal tract, lung, and thymus.

Octreotide long-acting repeatable among elderly patients with neuroendocrine tumors: a survival analysis of SEER-Medicare data

BACKGROUND

Octreotide long-acting repeatable (LAR) is approved in the United States for the management of carcinoid syndromes among patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NET). The objective of our study is to evaluate the impact of octreotide LAR on overall survival (OS), as it has not been established.

METHODS

NET patients of 65 years and older diagnosed between January 1999 and December 2009 were identified from the SEER-Medicare database. We compared the OS of NET patients who started octreotide LAR within 12 months of diagnosis with those who did not receive it during the same period. We conducted Kaplan-Meier estimations and Cox proportional hazard models to examine the association between octreotide LAR and OS.

RESULTS

Among 1,176 distant stage patients, 233 (20%) received octreotide LAR within 12 months of diagnosis, compared with 2% (96 in 5,764) of local/regional stage patients. Median OS for patients who started octreotide LAR within 12 months was 35.22 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 27.96-47.77], longer than those who did not receive it (19.15 months; 95% CI, 16.36-22.80; P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that octreotide LAR was associated with significant survival improvement for distant stage patients (HR, 0.68; P < 0.001) and in the subgroups with (HR, 0.65; P, 0.003) and without (HR, 0.55; P, 0.002) carcinoid syndrome. No survival benefit was found among local/regional stage patients.

CONCLUSION

This population-based study suggests potential survival benefits of octreotide LAR among elderly distant stage NET patients, both with or without carcinoid syndrome.

IMPACT

The study provides population-based evidence of a positive association between octreotide LAR and overall survival among elderly distant stage NET patients.