Impact of clinical risk category on prognosis and prediction of chemotherapy benefit in early breast cancer (EBC) by age and the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) in TAILORx

503

Background: TAILORx established that endocrine therapy (ET) alone is non-inferior to adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) plus ET in EBC and a 21-gene RS of 11-25, with some benefit if ≤50 years (y) with RS 16-25 (PMID: 29860917). We evaluated whether clinical risk (tumor size & histologic grade) provides additional prognostic information to RS, a secondary trial objective. Methods: Clinical risk by was assessed by Adjuvant! (version 8.0) using MINDACT criteria (PMID 27557300), defined as low clinical risk (LCR - tumor ≤3 cm and low grade, <2 cm and intermediate grade, or ≤1 cm and high grade) or high clinical risk (HCR -not meeting LCR criteria). Results: Of 9427 women with RS and clinical risk information, 70% were LCR and 30% HCR, with comparable distribution by age ( ≤50 vs. >50). The RS was 26-100 in 9% of LCR and 27% of HCR patients, with similar distributions by age. Although LCR/HCR provided additional prognostic information in each RS category for iDFS, including RS 0-10 (9-year rates 86.7% vs. 75.7% LCR vs. HCR), 11-25 (85.4% vs. 78.9%), and 26-100 (82.0% vs. 70.4%), iDFS rates were similar irrespective of CT (no vs. yes) in the entire RS 11-25 cohort whether LCR (85.8% vs. 85.1%) or HCR (79.8% vs. 77.9%). DRFI rates were also similar irrespective of CT in the RS 11-25 cohort or > 50y group whether LCR (96.0% vs. 96.1% overall; 96.5% vs. 96.0% > 50y) or HCR (92.3% vs. 89.9% overall; 91.7% vs. 90.7% >50y). For women ≤50y, the absolute reduction in distant recurrence from CT with a RS of 16-20 (N=923) was -0.2% (standard error [SE]±2.1%) for LCR vs. 6.5%(SE±4.9%) for HCR (vs. 1.6%[SE±1.9%] overall), whereas for a RS 21-25 (N=492) it was 6.4% (SE±4.9%) for LCR vs. 8.6% (SE±6.2%) for HCR (vs. 6.5%[SE±3.7%] overall). Conclusions: Clinical risk stratification provides additional prognostic information to the 21-gene RS, but not prediction of CT benefit in the overall TAILORx population or those > 50y, and facilitates more refined estimates of absolute CT benefit for women ≤50y with a RS 16-25. (Funded by National Cancer Institute, Komen Foundation, Breast Cancer Research Foundation). Clinical trial information: NCT00310180.

Simulation modeling of the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer

526

Background: The recent Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment (TAILORx) was practice changing. However, several important questions remain unanswered about therapy for women with early stage, hormone receptor positive (HR+), HER2- breast cancers, including chemotherapy effects by age and different Oncotype recurrence score (RS) cut-points, and longer follow-up. We developed a simulation model to extend the trial results to begin to fill these gaps. Methods: We developed a simulation model using an empirical Bayesian approach to simulate women eligible for the TAILORx trial. The joint distributions of patient and tumor characteristics were derived from de-identified TAILORx data. The remaining inputs used data independent of the trial, including SEER, the Oxford Overview, and other trials. TAILORx was simulated to examine the effects of chemotherapy (+ hormonal Rx) vs. hormonal Rx alone on distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) at 9- and 20-years by age (≤50 and >50 years) and RS (11-25 and 16-25). We also evaluated the effects of chemotherapy in women with RS 26-30. Hazard ratios (HR) were determined using Cox regressions and DRFS by treatment were derived from Kaplan-Meier curves. We report the mean results from 1000 trial simulations, where each simulation randomly sampled values for each parameter from their observed joint distribution. Finally, the original trial was replicated for model validation. Results: The model closely replicated actual trial results. Sample sizes ranged from 7000-10000. The model estimated that chemotherapy improved DFRS in women aged ≤50 with RS 16-25 (Table). The 20-year event rates remained low in the 11-25 category. Among women with RS 26-30, HR for no chemo vs. chemo was 1.38 (95% CI:1.18-1.58). Conclusions: Simulation suggests that chemotherapy may reduce distant recurrence in younger women at different cut points between 11-25. Simulation modeling may be useful to translate trial results to broader population subgroups than those possible to test in RCTs. Nine-year distant recurrence-free survival by chemotherapy. [Table: see text]

Abstract P2-08-18: Tumor microenvironment of metastasis (TMEM) score in residual breast carcinoma post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy as an independent prognosticator of distant recurrence

Background: Tumor microenvironment of metastasis (TMEM) is a microanatomical structure composed by 3 cells in direct contact, including a tumor cell expressing the actin-regulatory protein Mammalian-enabled (Mena), a perivascular Tie2hi/Vegfhi-expressing macrophage, and an endothelial cell. TMEM are intravasation sites that function as doorways for hematogenous tumor cell dissemination and metastases (Harney et al. Cancer Discovery 2015). TMEM may be identified and enumerated by triple immunohistochemistry in mouse and human mammary carcinomas. High TMEM score is associated with increased risk of distant metastasis in early stage breast cancer, and provides complementary prognostic information to IHC4 (Rohan et al. JNCI 2014) and Oncotype DX Recurrence Score in ER+, HER2-negative breast cancer (Sparano et al. NPJ Breast Cancer, 2017). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) increases TMEM score in breast carcinoma in animal models and humans, indicating a previously unrecognized mechanism of resistance to cytotoxic therapy (Karagiannis et al. Science Trans Med 2017). Intravasation at TMEM sites may be inhibited using agents that block release of VEGF from TMEM-associated TIE2-hi, VEGF-hi macrophages (Harney et al. Mol Cancer Ther, 2017). Here we investigated whether TMEM score in post-NAC treated breast carcinoma is prognostic of distant recurrence in localized breast cancer after NAC, and thus provides a foundation for testing agents that block TMEM function in combination with NAC.

Methods: We determined TMEM score in 80 evaluable patients' post-NAC specimens with residual invasive ductal carcinomas of at least 0.5 cm. Approximately 60% of patients had ER+/HER2-negative, 28% had triple negative and 12% had HER2+ disease. Most of the patients received doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide + taxane and an anti-HER2 therapy if applicable. Tissue sections from residual tumors were stained for TMEM using triple immunohistochemistry for Mena-expressing cancer cells, CD31-expressing endothelial cells and CD68-expressing macrophages. The stained slides were scanned, and the images were analyzed by three pathologists, blinded to outcome, who independently determined the tissue areas appropriate for TMEM scoring. TMEM was scored within these areas using an automated algorithm.

Results: TMEM score was significantly higher in patients with distant recurrence (average TMEM=106), compared to patients without distant recurrence (average TMEM=71) (p&lt;0.01, two-sided t-test). Moreover, in a Cox proportional hazards model that included TMEM score (upper tertile vs. lower 2 tertiles), age (&gt;50 yrs. vs. &lt;50), race (black vs non-black), tumor stage (T 1-3), estrogen receptor (ER) status (+ vs -), high TMEM score was associated with a increased risk of distant recurrence (HR=2.2, 95% CI=1.0 to 4.9, p=0.05)

Conclusion: TMEM score may provide independent prognostic information for distant recurrence in patients with residual invasive carcinoma after NAC. These results support the use of agents that block TMEM function in combination with NAC, as planned in the I-SPY2 trial.

Citation Format: Oktay MH, D'Alfonso T, Ginter P, Lanjewar S, Entenberg D, Pastoriza JM, Wang Y, Lin Y, Karagiannnis GS, Lin J, Ye X, Anampa J, Xue X, Rohan TE, Sparano JA, Condeelis JS. Tumor microenvironment of metastasis (TMEM) score in residual breast carcinoma post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy as an independent prognosticator of distant recurrence [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-08-18.

Abstract P6-18-22: Phase Ib study of rebastinib plus antitubulin therapy with paclitaxel (P) or eribulin (E) in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

BACKGROUND: TMEM (Tumor Microenvironment of Metastasis) are the portal for tumor cell intravasation into the circulation and subsequent metastasis (Harney et al Cancer Discov 2015). The potent Tie2 kinase inhibitor rebastinib inhibits intravasation at TMEM sites, reduces circulating tumor cell (CTC) burden, increases angiopoietin (Ang) 1/2 levels, prevents distant metastases, and improves survival in breast cancer animal models when added to either P or E (Harney et al MCT 2017), and circumvent chemotherapy-induced pro-metastatic changes in the tumor microenvironment mediated by TMEM (Karagiannis et al STM 2017). We sought to determine the safety of rebastinib combined with antitubulin therapy (P or E) in patients with HER2- MBC. We also hypothesized that addition of rebastinib would reduce CTC burden and increase Ang levels by blocking Ang-mediated stimulation of VEGF release from TMEM-associated macrophages.

METHODS: We aimed to determine the safety and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of rebastinib (2 dose levels: 50 mg or 100 mg PO BID) in combination with P (80 mg/m2 x 12 weeks) or E (1.4 mg/m2 on day 1 & 8 q 21 days) using a standard 3+3 design (1 cycle = 21 days). Secondary objectives included evaluating the effect of the P/E + rebastinib combination on CTCs (TelomeScan) and Ang levels. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 3-4 febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and non-hematologic toxicity during the first 6 weeks of therapy. Eligibility included HER2- MBC, ECOG PS 0-1, CDK4/6 inhibitor progression if ER+. Patients with ≤ 2 prior non-taxane chemotherapy regimens received P+ rebastinib, whereas those with ≥ 2 chemo regimens (including a taxane) received E+ rebastinib.

RESULTS: Of 11 treated patients, 6 received rebastinib + P and 5 received rebastinib + E (2 non-evaluable due to rapid disease progression and non-compliance). Among 11 patients who received 60 treatment cycles, only 1 patient (treated with eribulin) had grade 3 events (anemia and neuropathy after week 6) potentially related to treatment. When combined with P, the RP2D of rebastinib was 100 mg PO BID, with DLT occurring in 0/6 patients. When combined with E, 0/3 evaluable patients had a DLT at 50 mg BID of rebastinib (accrual ongoing for 100mg BID). Best response included partial response/stable disease in 4(2PR/2SD) of 6 treated with P+ rebastinib, and 1(1PR) of 5 treated with E+ rebastinib. CTCs decreased during therapy (median decrease 99.7 %) and 4/8 patients converted from CTC+ to CTC-. Ang1 levels increased during therapy in 8 patients (0.2-7.0 fold), while Ang2 levels were also increased in 8 patients (0.2-1.4 fold).

CONCLUSIONS: When combined with P x 12 weeks, the RP2D of rebastinib is 100 mg PO BID. When combined with E, the RP2D of rebastinib is at least 50mg PO BID; however, the 100 mg PO BID dose level is still accruing patients. The P/E + rebastinib combinations are associated with antitumor activity and exhibit pharmacodynamic evidence indicating blockade of Tie2 (increased Ang) and TMEM function (reduced CTCs) We plan to further evaluate the P+ rebastinib combination as neoadjuvant therapy in the I-SPY program, and continue further evaluation of P/E + rebastinib combinations in MBC.

Citation Format: Anampa JD, Xue X, Oh S-y, Kornblum N, Sadan S, Oktay MH, Condeelis J, Sparano JA. Phase Ib study of rebastinib plus antitubulin therapy with paclitaxel (P) or eribulin (E) in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-18-22.

Abstract GS6-03: Symptoms and health-related quality of life on endocrine therapy alone (E) versus chemoendocrine therapy (C+E): TAILORx patient-reported outcomes results

Background: TAILORx patient-reported outcomes (PRO) quantify symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQL) from C+E beyond E alone from the patient's perspective, thus can inform decision-making for women in the intermediate risk group for whom chemotherapy may still be considered.

Methods: TAILORx participants with OncoType DX Recurrence Scores 11-25 were randomly assigned to E or C+E. All TAILORx participants enrolled 1/2010-10/2010 (N=612) completed PROs measuring fatigue, endocrine symptoms, cognitive impairments (PCI), and fear of recurrence at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months. HRQL was assessed at baseline, 12, and 36 months. Linear regression (LR) examined PRO scores among the per-protocol sample.

Results: Overall, participants reported significantly more fatigue, endocrine symptoms and PCI at 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months compared to baseline and those randomized to C+E reported a greater magnitude of change baseline-3 months compared to those randomized to E alone (Table 1). Overall, by 12 months symptoms were comparable between groups. Pre-menopausal women had comparable symptoms at 24 and 36 months. Post-menopausal women randomized to C+E had greater endocrine symptoms at 24 and 36 months and greater fatigue at 6 and 24 months. Fear of recurrence was comparable between arms during treatment and follow-up. Multiple linear regression identified increased fatigue (LR slope β=0.67), endocrine symptoms (β =0.14), and PCI (β=0.11) as significant predictors of decreased HRQL across arms (p&lt; 0.001). HRQL was comparable between E and C+E at 12- and 36-months.

Mean PRO change scores from baseline by treatment arm and menopausal status in per protocol population  Months    36122436N=Overall454469458384343n=Pre-menopausal153151150118103n=Post-menopausal301318308266240FACIT-Fatigue     Overall sample     C+E-8.77-4.37-4.01-4.27-3.67E-2.48-1.97-2.14-1.49-1.83LMED-5.32***-1.55-1.01-1.76-0.90Pre-M     C+E-8.01-3.26-2.99-2.45-1.60E-3.87-1.66-1.32-2.52-2.11LMED-3.11-0.82-1.121.021.46Post-M     C+E-9.22-4.97-4.55-5.14-4.67E-1.87-2.10-2.52-1.09-1.71LMED-6.42***-1.99*-1.16-3.02*-2.01FACT-Endocrine Symptoms     Overall sample     C+E-5.56-5.63-6.96-6.81-7.14E-3.61-4.24-5.62-5.31-5.17LMED-1.62*-0.97-1.08-1.05-1.69Pre-M     C+E-7.62-8.34-7.94-8.29-8.96E-5.96-6.19-8.95-10.39-10.84LMED-1.44-1.631.062.272.18Post-M     C+E-4.39-4.19-6.45-6.10-6.28E-2.55-3.41-4.10-3.23-2.87LMED-1.49-0.45-2.04-2.39*-3.17**Significance between mean change scores *p&lt;0.05;**p&lt;0.01;***p&lt;0.001. LMED=estimated tx difference using linear model regressing score on baseline value and tx

Conclusions: TAILORx is the first trial to examine patient-reported fatigue, endocrine symptoms, PCI and HRQL among breast cancer patients randomized to endocrine therapy alone vs chemoendocrine therapy, thus allowing us to quantify acute and long-term symptoms uniquely attributable to chemotherapy. As expected, chemotherapy is associated with greater fatigue, endocrine symptoms and PCI acutely during treatment, and for post-menopausal women with greater long-term endocrine symptoms. Increased symptoms were associated with poorer HRQL. Long-term HRQL was comparable between groups.

Citation Format: Wagner LI, Gray RJ, Garcia S, Whelan TJ, Tevarweerk A, Yanez B, Carlos R, Gareen I, McCaskill-Stevens W, Cella D, Sparano JA, Sledge, Jr. GW, On behalf of the TAILORx Study Team. Symptoms and health-related quality of life on endocrine therapy alone (E) versus chemoendocrine therapy (C+E): TAILORx patient-reported outcomes results [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS6-03.

Abstract GS4-07: Race, ethnicity and clinical outcomes in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer: results from the TAILORx trial

Background: Black race is associated with worse outcomes in localized hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer in population-based and in clinical trial cohorts, whether using self-identified race (Albain et al. JNCI 2009 [PMID: 19584328; Sparano et al. JNCI 2012 [PMID: 22250182) or genetically-identified race (Schneider et al. J Precision Oncol 2017 [PMID: 29333527]). This disparity persists after adjustment for treatment delivery parameters (Hershman et al. JCO 2009 [PMID:19307504]). We evaluated clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment delivered and clinical outcomes in the Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment (TAILORx) by race and ethnicity (Sparano et al. NEJM 2018 [PMID: 29860917]).

Methods: The analysis included 9719 evaluable TAILORx participants. The association between clinical outcomes and race (white, black, Asian, other/unknown) and ethnicity (Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic) was examined, including invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), distant relapse-free interval (DRFI), relapse-free interval (RFI), and overall survival (OS). Proportional hazards models were fit including age (5 categories), tumor size (&gt;2 cm vs. &lt;=2 cm), histologic grade (high vs. medium vs. low vs. unknown), continuous recurrence score (RS), race, and ethnicity in the overall population and randomized treatment arms in the RS 11-25 cohort.

Results: The study population included 8189 (84%) whites, 693 (7%) blacks, 405 (4%) Asians, and 432 (4%) with other/unknown race. Regarding ethnicity, 7635 (79%) were non-Hispanic, 889 (9%) Hispanic, and 1195 (12%) unknown. There was no significant difference in RS distribution (p=0.22) in blacks compared with whites, or in median (17 vs. 17) or mean RS (19.1 vs. 18.2). There was likewise no difference in Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic ethnicity for RS distribution (p=0.72) or median (17 vs. 17) or mean RS (18.5 vs. 18.0). Black race (39% vs. 30%) and Hispanic ethnicity (39% vs. 30%) were both associated with younger age (&lt;/=50 years) at diagnosis. The use and type of adjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy, and duration of endocrine therapy, were similar in black (vs. white) and Hispanic (vs. non-Hispanic) populations. In proportional hazards models, black race (compared with white race) was associated with worse clinical outcomes in the entire population and in those with a RS 11-25 (see table). Hispanic ethnicity was generally associated with better outcomes (compared with non-Hispanic ethnicity). For the cohort with a RS of 11-25, there was no evidence for chemotherapy benefit for any racial or ethnic group.

Race (black vs.white) and clinical outcomes in proportional hazards modelsClinical endpointEntire Population (N=693 black) Hazard ratio for eventRS 11-25 (N=471 black) Hazard ratio for eveniDFS1.33 (p=0.005)1.49 (p=0.001)DRFI1.21 (p=0.28)1.60 (p=0.02)RFI1.39 (p=0.02)1.80 (p&lt;0.001)OS1.52 (p=0.005)1.67 (p=0.003

Conclusions: In patients eligible and selected for participation in TAILORx, black women had worse clinical outcomes despite similar 21-gene assay RS results and comparable systemic therapy. This adds to an emerging body of evidence suggesting a biologic basis or other factors contributing to racial disparities in HR-positive breast cancer that requires further evaluation.

Citation Format: Albain K, Gray RJ, Sparano JA, Makower DF, Pritchard KI, Hayes DF, Geyer, Jr. CE, Dees EC, Goetz MP, Olson, Jr. JA, Lively T, Badve SS, Saphner TJ, Wagner LI, Whelan TJ, Ellis MJ, Paik S, Wood WC, Ravdin PM, Keane MM, Gomez HL, Reddy PS, Goggins TF, Mayer IA, Brufsky AM, Toppmeyer DL, Kaklamani VG, Berenberg JL, Abrams J, Sledge, Jr. GW. Race, ethnicity and clinical outcomes in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer: results from the TAILORx trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-07.

Black race and distant recurrence after neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer

Black race compared to white race is associated with more advanced stage and biologically aggressive breast cancer. Consequently, black patients are more frequently treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) than white patients. However, it is unclear how distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) of black patients treated with NAC, compares to DRFS of black patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). We evaluated the association between race, distant recurrence, and type of chemotherapy (AC or NAC) in localized or locally advanced breast cancer. We evaluated DRFS in 807 patients, including 473 black, 252 white, 56 Hispanic, and 26 women of other or mixed race. The association between AC or NAC and DRFS was examined using multivariate Cox proportional hazard models that included race, age, stage, estrogen receptor (ER) and triple negative (TN) status. When the black and white subjects were pooled for the analysis the features associated with worse DRFS included stage III disease and age < 50 years, but not ER-negative disease, TN disease, the use of NAC, or black race. However, in the analysis stratified by race NAC was associated with worse DRFS compared to AC in black (HR 2.70; 95% CI 1.73-4.22; p < 0.0001), but not in white women (HR 1.29, 95% CI 0.56-2.95; p = 0.36). Black patients treated with NAC had worse DRFS than black patients treated with AC, or white patients treated with either NAC or AC. These findings need to be validated in a large-scale observational study and the effect of NAC on the breast cancer microenvironment in black women needs to be further evaluated.

Combination antiretroviral therapy accelerates immune recovery in patients with HIV-related lymphoma treated with EPOCH: a comparison within one prospective trial AMC034

Drug-drug interactions between cART and chemotherapy may impact HIV and lymphoma control or lead to increased toxicities. No prospective comparative data informs potential harms and benefits. In AMC034, HIV-associated high-grade B-cell NHL patients received DA-EPOCH with rituximab. cART was given with EPOCH or delayed until chemotherapy completion per investigator choice. Pharmacokinetic, immunological, and treatment effects of concurrent cART were evaluated. CD4 counts dropped during EPOCH in both groups but recovered to higher than baseline 6 months post-EPOCH only in the cART group. HIV viral load decreased during chemotherapy in the cART group but increased in the non-cART group. Incidence of grade ≥3 infectious, hematologic, or neurological toxicities was similar. Concurrent cART was not associated with 1-year EFS or OS. cART with EPOCH was well-tolerated and allowed for faster immune recovery. While we did not observe differences in outcome, the preponderance of evidence is in favor of combining cART with chemotherapy.

Double-Blind Phase III Trial of Adjuvant Chemotherapy With and Without Bevacizumab in Patients With Lymph Node-Positive and High-Risk Lymph Node-Negative Breast Cancer (E5103)

Purpose Bevacizumab improves progression-free survival but not overall survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer. E5103 tested the effect of bevacizumab in the adjuvant setting in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative disease. Patients and Methods Patients were assigned 1:2:2 to receive placebo with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by weekly paclitaxel (arm A), bevacizumab only during AC and paclitaxel (arm B), or bevacizumab during AC and paclitaxel followed by bevacizumab monotherapy for 10 cycles (arm C). Random assignment was stratified and bevacizumab dose adjusted for choice of AC schedule. Radiation and hormonal therapy were administered concurrently with bevacizumab in arm C. The primary end point was invasive disease-free survival (IDFS). Results Four thousand nine hundred ninety-four patients were enrolled. Median age was 52 years; 64% of patients were estrogen receptor positive, 27% were lymph node negative, and 78% received dose-dense AC. Chemotherapy-associated adverse events including myelosuppression and neuropathy were similar across all arms. Grade ≥ 3 hypertension was more common in bevacizumab-treated patients, but thrombosis, proteinuria, and hemorrhage were not. The cumulative incidence of clinical congestive heart failure at 15 months was 1.0%, 1.9%, and 3.0% in arms A, B, and C, respectively. Bevacizumab exposure was less than anticipated, with approximately 24% of patients in arm B and approximately 55% of patients in arm C discontinuing bevacizumab before completing planned therapy. Five-year IDFS was 77% (95% CI, 71% to 81%) in arm A, 76% (95% CI, 72% to 80%) in arm B, and 80% (95% CI, 77% to 83%) in arm C. Conclusion Incorporation of bevacizumab into sequential anthracycline- and taxane-containing adjuvant therapy does not improve IDFS or overall survival in patients with high-risk human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer. Longer duration bevacizumab therapy is unlikely to be feasible given the high rate of early discontinuation.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy Guided by a 21-Gene Expression Assay in Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

The recurrence score based on the 21-gene breast cancer assay predicts chemotherapy benefit if it is high and a low risk of recurrence in the absence of chemotherapy if it is low; however, there is uncertainty about the benefit of chemotherapy for most patients, who have a midrange score.

METHODS

We performed a prospective trial involving 10,273 women with hormone-receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, axillary node-negative breast cancer. Of the 9719 eligible patients with follow-up information, 6711 (69%) had a midrange recurrence score of 11 to 25 and were randomly assigned to receive either chemoendocrine therapy or endocrine therapy alone. The trial was designed to show noninferiority of endocrine therapy alone for invasive disease-free survival (defined as freedom from invasive disease recurrence, second primary cancer, or death).

RESULTS

Endocrine therapy was noninferior to chemoendocrine therapy in the analysis of invasive disease-free survival (hazard ratio for invasive disease recurrence, second primary cancer, or death [endocrine vs. chemoendocrine therapy], 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.94 to 1.24; P=0.26). At 9 years, the two treatment groups had similar rates of invasive disease-free survival (83.3% in the endocrine-therapy group and 84.3% in the chemoendocrine-therapy group), freedom from disease recurrence at a distant site (94.5% and 95.0%) or at a distant or local-regional site (92.2% and 92.9%), and overall survival (93.9% and 93.8%). The chemotherapy benefit for invasive disease-free survival varied with the combination of recurrence score and age (P=0.004), with some benefit of chemotherapy found in women 50 years of age or younger with a recurrence score of 16 to 25.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant endocrine therapy and chemoendocrine therapy had similar efficacy in women with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative, axillary node-negative breast cancer who had a midrange 21-gene recurrence score, although some benefit of chemotherapy was found in some women 50 years of age or younger. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; TAILORx ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00310180 .).

Abstract A92: Black race is associated with worse distant relapse-free survival in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant compared to adjuvant systemic chemotherapy

Background: Compared to white women, black women with operable breast cancer treated with primary surgical therapy and adjuvant or neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy have higher recurrence rates and breast cancer mortality. Large randomized prospective studies did not find significant differences in distant-recurrence-free survival (DRFS) and overall survival (OS) between breast cancer patients treated in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting for predominantly white populations. However, data indicating that neoadjuvant treatment is equivalent to adjuvant treatment for black breast cancer patients are missing. Here, we first examined racial differences in DRFS among breast cancer patients treated in the neoadjuvant setting at Einstein-Montefiore Center for Cancer Care (EMCCC) in the Bronx, and then investigated if DRFS in black patients treated in the neoadjuvant setting is comparable to DRFS in the adjuvant setting.

Methods: We evaluated DRFS in 241 racially diverse patients with localized or regionally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy between January 2000 and December 2016. In addition, we evaluated DRFS in 474 white and 701 black patients with localized or regionally advanced breast cancer treated with systemic adjuvant (N=432 [whites], 596 [blacks]) or neoadjuvant (N=42 [whites], 105 [blacks]) chemotherapy. Using multivariate Cox proportional hazard models, we generated hazard ratios (HRs) (95% confidence intervals [CI]) for risk of distant recurrence, with adjustment for age (&lt;50 vs &gt;/50 years), stage (I/II vs III), estrogen receptor (ER) status (+ vs -), HER2/neu overexpression (+ vs -/equivocal/unknown), triple-negative (TN) status (yes vs no), and type of systemic chemotherapy (adjuvant vs neoadjuvant).

Results: Black patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy had significantly worse DRFS than white patients (HR=2.29; 95%CI=1.02-5.15, p=0.04). DRFS in non-black Hispanics and patients from racial backgrounds other than Hispanic or black compared to whites was not statistically different. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with worse DRFS compared to adjuvant chemotherapy in black (HR=3.72; 95%CI=4.03-5.81; p=&lt;0.0001), but not in white women.

Conclusion: Black patients with localized breast cancer treated with systemic neoadjuvant chemotherapy not only have inferior DRFS compared to white patients, but also worse DRFS when compared to black patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, after adjustment for clinical covariates. This observation needs to be confirmed in further prospective studies, and biologic factors contributing to this finding need to be evaluated.

Citation Format: Jessica M. Pastoriza, George S. Karagiannis, Xiaonan Xue, Juan Lin, John S. Condeelis, Joseph A. Sparano, Thomas E. Rohan, Maja H. Oktay. Black race is associated with worse distant relapse-free survival in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant compared to adjuvant systemic chemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Tenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2017 Sep 25-28; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2018;27(7 Suppl):Abstract nr A92.

Abstract CT021: Phase Ib study of rebastinib plus antitubulin therapy with paclitaxel (P) or eribulin (E) in patients with HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

BACKGROUND: Metastasis is the primary cause of death in breast cancer, yet no current therapies specifically inhibit metastasis. TMEM (Tumor Microenvironment of Metastasis) are the portal for tumor cell intravasation into the circulation and subsequent metastasis (Harney et al Cancer Discov 2015 [PMCID:4560669). The potent Tie2 kinase inhibitor rebastinib inhibits intravasation at TMEM sites, reduces circulating tumor cell (CTC) burden, prevents distant metastases, and improves survival in breast cancer animal models when added to either P or E (Karagiannis et al STM 2017 [PMCID:5592784]; Harney et al MCT 2017 [PMCID:28838996]). We hypothesized that the addition of rebastinib to antitubulin therapy (P or E) in patients with HER2- MBC would be safe, and by inhibiting TMEM function, would also reduce CTC burden by blocking hematogenous dissemination.

METHODS: The primary objective was to determine the safety and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of rebastinib (2 dose levels: 50 mg or 100 mg PO BID) in combination with P (80 mg/m2 x 12 weeks) or E (1.4 mg/m2 on day 1 & 8 q 21 days) using a standard 3+3 design (1 cycle = 21 days). Secondary objectives included evaluating the effect of the P/E + rebastinib combination on CTCs (TelomeScan). Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 3-4 febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and non-hematologic toxicity during the first 6 weeks of therapy. Eligibility included HER2- MBC, ECOG PS 0-1, progression after a CDK4/6 inhibitor if ER+. Patients with ≤ 2 prior non-taxane chemotherapy regimens received P+ rebastinib, whereas those with ≥ 2 chemo regimens (including a taxane) received E+ rebastinib.

RESULTS: Of 10 treated patients, 6 received rebastinib + P and 4 received rebastinib + E (2 non-evaluable due to rapid disease progression [n=1] and non-compliance [n=1]). Among 10 patients who received 48 treatment cycles, only 1 patient (treated with eribulin) had grade 3 events (anemia and neuropathy after week 6) potentially related to treatment. When combined with P, the RP2D of rebastinib was 100 mg PO BID, with DLT occurring in 0/6 patients. When combined with E, 0/2 evaluable patients had a DLT at 50 mg BID of rebastinib (accrual ongoing). Best response included partial response/stable disease in 4(2PR/2SD) of 5 treated with P+ rebastinib (1 too early), and 2(1PR/1SD) of 4 treated with E+ rebastinib. CTCs decreased during therapy (baseline vs. day 43, median decrease 99.7 %) and 4/8 patients converted from CTC+ to CTC-.

CONCLUSIONS: When combined with P x 12 weeks, the RP2D of rebastinib is 100 mg PO BID. The P/E + rebastinib combinations are associated with antitumor activity and exhibit pharmacodynamic evidence suggesting TMEM function blockade. We plan to further evaluate the P+ rebastinib combination as neoadjuvant therapy in the I-SPY program, and continue further evaluation of P/E + rebastinib combinations in MBC.

Citation Format: Jesus D. Anampa, Xiaonan Xue, Sun-young Oh, Noah Kornblum, Sara Sadan, Maja Oktay, John Condeelis, Joseph A. Sparano. Phase Ib study of rebastinib plus antitubulin therapy with paclitaxel (P) or eribulin (E) in patients with HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT021.

Abstract 67: Chemotherapy induced pro-metastatic changes in the primary breast tumors of racially diverse patients

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) induces influx of bone marrow-derived proangiogenic Tie2hi monocytes into the primary tumor, resulting in increased density of perivascular Tie2hi macrophages (1). Perivascular Tie2hi/Vegfhi macrophages in physical contact with Mena expressing cancer cells create micro-anatomic sites of transient vascular permeability called TMEM, which mediate cancer cell intravasation and dissemination (2). Cancer cells capable of intravasation via TMEM sites express high level of MenaINV, an isoform of Mena, induced by macrophage contact, which renders tumor cells intravasation-competent (3, 4). Consequently, breast cancers from mice and patients treated with NAC have increased density of TMEM sites and show increased expression of MenaINV (1) Moreover, in PyMT mouse mammary carcinoma and patient derived xenografts, NAC increases the number of circulating tumor cells and lung metastasis (1). The Tie2-inhibitor rebastinib, which inhibits TMEM function, can reverse chemotherapy-induced increases in the number of CTCs and lung metastasis in mouse mammary carcinoma (1, 5). Although NAC induces pro-metastatic changes in breast cancer microenvironment, large randomized prospective studies did not find significant differences in distant-recurrence free survival (DRFS) and overall survival (OS) between breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in predominantly white populations. Since the breast cancer microenvironment in black women has higher microvascular density and density of Tie2hi macrophages, suggesting that black women may be more prone to develop TMEM-associated pro-metastatic changes in response to NAC, we questioned if there is a difference in DRFS in black women treated with NAC compared to AC. We evaluated DRFS in 1,211 racially diverse patients with localized or regionally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy between January 2000 and December 2016 and found that black patients with localized breast cancer treated with systemic neoadjuvant chemotherapy not only have inferior DRFS compared to white patients, but also worse DRFS when compared to black patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, after adjustment for clinical covariates in multivariate analysis. The biologic factors contributing to this finding, in particular TMEM-mediated pro-metastatic changes have been evaluated and will be discussed. 1. Karagiannis et al, Sci Transl Med. 2017;9:397. 2. Harney et al, Cancer discovery. 2015;5:932. 3. Pignatelli J et al, Sci Rep. 2016;6:37874. 4. Pignatelli J et al, Sci Signal. 2014;7:353. 5. Harney et al, Mol Cancer Ther. 2017;16:2486.

Citation Format: George S. Karagiannis, Jessica M. Pastoriza, Sonali Lanjawar, Yarong Wang, David Entenberg, Esther Cheng, Timothy M. Dalfonso, Joan G. Jones, Jesus Anampa, Thomas E. Rohan, Joseph A. Sparano, John S. Condeelis, Maja H. Oktay. Chemotherapy induced pro-metastatic changes in the primary breast tumors of racially diverse patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 67.

TAILORx: Phase III trial of chemoendocrine therapy versus endocrine therapy alone in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer and an intermediate prognosis 21-gene recurrence score

LBA1

Background: In hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative, axillary node (AN)-negative breast cancer, the 21-gene expression assay (Oncotype DX Recurrence Score [RS]) is prognostic for distant recurrence, prognostic for low recurrence with endocrine therapy alone if low (0-10), and predictive of chemotherapy benefit if high (26 or higher). We performed a prospective, randomized trial of endocrine therapy (ET) versus chemoendocrine therapy (CET) in women with a mid-range RS of 11-25. Methods: Eligibility criteria included women 18-75 years of age with HR-positive, HER2-negative, axillary node (AN)-negative breast cancer and tumors 1.1-5.0 cm in size (or 0.6-1.0 cm and int/high grade) and agreed to have chemotherapy assigned or randomized based on the RS. Women with a mid-range RS (11-25) were randomized to receive ET or CET. The primary endpoint was invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), and the trial was designed to show non-inferiority for ET alone by not rejecting equality (hazard ratio [HR] margin up to 1.322 for omission of chemotherapy, 1-sided type I error rate 10%, type II error rate 5%). The target sample size was adjusted to compensate for non-adherence to randomized treatment, and the protocol-specified final analysis was triggered after 835 iDFS events. Results: Of the 10,253 eligible women enrolled between 4/7/06-10/6/10, 6711 (65.5%) had a RS of 11-25 and adequate information. There were 836 iDFS events at final analysis with a median followup of 90 months. ET was non-inferior to CET for iDFS (HR 1.08, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.94, 1.24, p=0.26) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. ET was also non-inferior for distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI; HR 1.03, p=0.80), recurrence-free interval (RFI; HR 1.12, p=0.28), and overall survival (OS; HR 0.97, p=0.80). Nine year rates were similar for iDFS (83.3% vs. 84.3%), DRFI (94.5% vs. 95.0%), RFI (92.2% vs. 92.9%), and OS (93.9% vs. 93.8%). Recurrence accounted for 338 (41.6%) the first iDFS event, of which 199 (23.8%) were distant recurrences. Treatment interaction tests were significant for age (iDFS p=0.03; RFI p= 0.02), but not menopause, tumor size, grade, or RS (continuous or RS 11-15, 16-20, 21-25). Conclusions: In women with HR-positive, HER2-negative, AN-negative breast cancer and a RS of 11-25, adjuvant ET was not inferior to CET in the ITT analysis. (Funded by NCI, BCRF, and Komen Foundation.) Clinical trial information: NCT00310180.

Refined estimates of local recurrence risks by DCIS score adjusting for clinicopathological features: a combined analysis of ECOG-ACRIN E5194 and Ontario DCIS cohort studies

PURPOSE

Better tools are needed to estimate local recurrence (LR) risk after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for DCIS. The DCIS score (DS) was validated as a predictor of LR in E5194 and Ontario DCIS cohort (ODC) after BCS. We combined data from E5194 and ODC adjusting for clinicopathological factors to provide refined estimates of the 10-year risk of LR after treatment by BCS alone.

METHODS

Data from E5194 and ODC were combined. Patients with positive margins or multifocality were excluded. Identical Cox regression models were fit for each study. Patient-specific meta-analysis was used to calculate precision-weighted estimates of 10-year LR risk by DS, age, tumor size and year of diagnosis.

RESULTS

The combined cohort includes 773 patients. The DS and age at diagnosis, tumor size and year of diagnosis provided independent prognostic information on the 10-year LR risk (p ≤ 0.009). Hazard ratios from E5194 and ODC cohorts were similar for the DS (2.48, 1.95 per 50 units), tumor size ≤ 1 versus  > 1-2.5 cm (1.45, 1.47), age ≥ 50 versus < 50 year (0.61, 0.84) and year ≥ 2000 (0.67, 0.49). Utilization of DS combined with tumor size and age at diagnosis predicted more women with very low (≤ 8%) or higher (> 15%) 10-year LR risk after BCS alone compared to utilization of DS alone or clinicopathological factors alone.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined analysis provides refined estimates of 10-year LR risk after BCS for DCIS. Adding information on tumor size and age at diagnosis to the DS adjusting for year of diagnosis provides improved LR risk estimates to guide treatment decision making.

Pre-surgical trial of the AKT inhibitor MK-2206 in patients with operable invasive breast cancer: a New York Cancer Consortium trial

INTRODUCTION

The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is an oncogenic driver in breast cancer (BC). In this multi-center, pre-surgical study, we evaluated the tissue effects of the AKT inhibitor MK-2206 in women with stage I-III BC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two doses of weekly oral MK2206 were administered at days - 9 and - 2 before surgery. The primary endpoint was reduction of pAkt^Ser473 in breast tumor tissue from diagnostic biopsy to surgery. Secondary endpoints included changes in PI3K/AKT pathway tumor markers, tumor proliferation (ki-67), insulin growth factor pathway blood markers, pharmacokinetics (PK), genomics, and MK-2206 tolerability. Paired t tests were used to compare biomarker changes in pre- and post-MK-2206, and two-sample t tests to compare with prospectively accrued untreated controls.

RESULTS

Despite dose reductions, the trial was discontinued after 12 patients due to grade III rash, mucositis, and pruritus. While there was a trend to reduction in pAKT after MK-2206 (p = 0.06), there was no significant change compared to controls (n = 5, p = 0.65). After MK-2206, no significant changes in ki-67, pS6, PTEN, or stathmin were observed. There was no significant association between dose level and PK (p = 0.11). Compared to controls, MK-2206 significantly increased serum glucose (p = 0.02), insulin (p < 0.01), C-peptide (p < 0.01), and a trend in IGFBP-3 (p = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

While a trend to pAKT reduction after MK-2206 was observed, there was no significant change compared to controls. However, the accrued population was limited, due to toxicity being greater than expected. Pre-surgical trials can identify in vivo activity in the early drug development, but side effects must be considered in this healthy population.

Randomized Phase II Trial of Fulvestrant Plus Everolimus or Placebo in Postmenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer Resistant to Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy: Results of PrE0102

Purpose The mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus targets aberrant signaling through the PI3K/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin pathway, a mechanism of resistance to anti-estrogen therapy in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. We hypothesized that everolimus plus the selective ER downregulator fulvestrant would be more efficacious than fulvestrant alone in ER-positive metastatic breast cancer resistant to aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy. Patients and Methods This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II study included 131 postmenopausal women with ER-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, AI-resistant metastatic breast cancer randomly assigned to fulvestrant (500 mg days 1 and 15 of cycle 1, then day 1 of cycles 2 and beyond) plus everolimus or placebo. The study was designed to have 90% power to detect a 70% improvement in median progression-free survival from 5.4 months to 9.2 months. Secondary end points included objective response and clinical benefit rate (response or stable disease for at least 24 weeks). Prophylactic corticosteroid mouth rinses were not used. Results The addition of everolimus to fulvestrant improved the median progression-free survival from 5.1 to 10.3 months (hazard ratio, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.40 to 0.92]; stratified log-rank P = .02), indicating that the primary trial end point was met. Objective response rates were similar (18.2% v 12.3%; P = .47), but the clinical benefit rate was significantly higher in the everolimus arm (63.6% v 41.5%; P = .01). Adverse events of all grades occurred more often in the everolimus arm, including oral mucositis (53% v 12%), fatigue (42% v 22%), rash (38% v 5%), anemia (31% v. 6%), diarrhea (23% v 8%), hyperglycemia (19% v 5%), hypertriglyceridemia (17% v 3%), and pneumonitis (17% v 0%), although grade 3 to 4 events were uncommon. Conclusion Everolimus enhances the efficacy of fulvestrant in AI-resistant, ER-positive metastatic breast cancer.