Randomized phase II placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of topical pure emu oil for joint pain related to adjuvant aromatase inhibitor use in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer: JUST (Joints Under Study)

PURPOSE

Aromatase inhibitors are standard of care in women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. Published evidence demonstrates that adverse effects may have an impact on drug compliance, with arthralgias being one of the most commonly reported adverse effects.

METHODS

Eligible patients were postmenopausal women who had experienced arthralgia following initiation of an aromatase inhibitor. Patients who experienced arthralgias following a minimum of a 3-month treatment on the aromatase inhibitor were randomized to emu oil or placebo oil. The primary endpoint was to assess for a reduction in pain as measured by a visual analogue score after 8 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients comprised the intent-to-treat population, and there was no statistically significant benefit with use of EO. However, there was a statistically significant improvement in pain (visual analogue score was -1.28; p < 0.001) and Brief Pain Inventory severity score -0.88 (p < 0.001), as well as functional interference (Brief Pain Inventory interference -1.10 (p < 0.001) for the entire population following an 8-week administration of EO or placebo oil.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthralgias, as a result of aromatase inhibitor use, may be ameliorated by the use of topical oil massaged onto the joint. Further research into interventions for this common side effect is needed.

Genomic risk prediction of aromatase inhibitor-related arthralgias (AIA) in breast cancer (BC) patients using a novel analytical algorithm (NAA)

10102

Background: Many BC patients treated with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) develop AIA; 20% have symptoms severe enough to effect treatment compliance. Results of candidate gene studies to identify AIA risk are limited in scope. In this case-controlled study, we evaluated the potential of a NAA to predict AIA using germline single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data obtained prior to treatment initiation. Methods: Systematic chart review of 700 AI-treated patients with stage I-III BC between 2003-2012 identified asymptomatic patients (n = 39) and those with clinically significant AIA resulting in AI termination or therapy switch (n = 123). Germline DNA was obtained from peripheral blood cells and SNP genotyping performed using the Affymetrix UK BioBank Axiom Array to yield 695,277 SNPs. The identity of the cluster of SNPs that most closely defined AIA risk was discovered using an NAA that sequentially combined statistical filtering and a machine learning algorithm. NCBI PhenGenI and Ensemble databases were used to define gene attribution of the 200 most discriminating SNPs. Phenotype, pathway, and ontologic analyses assessed functional and mechanistic validity. Results: Cases and controls were similar in demographic characteristics. A cluster of 70 SNPs, correlated to 57 genes (accounting for linkage disequilibrium), was identified. This SNP group predicted AIA occurrence with a maximum accuracy of 75.93%. Strong associations with arthralgia, breast cancer, and estrogen phenotypes were seen in 19/57 genes (33%) and were functionally and ontologically consistent. Conclusions: Using a NAA, we identified a 70 SNP cluster that predicted AIA risk with fair accuracy. Phenotype, functional, and pathway analysis of attributed genes was consistent with clinical phenotypes. This study is the first to link a specific SNP/gene cluster to AIA risk independent of candidate gene bias. An ongoing prospective companion study will be used to validate and to expand upon results.

Abstract P1-03-01: An international multicenter study to evaluate reproducibility of automated scoring methods for assessment of Ki67 in breast cancer

Background: The nuclear proliferation biomarker Ki67 has multiple potential roles in breast cancer, including prognosis-based decisions, but unacceptable between-laboratory variability has limited its clinical value. The International Ki67 Working Group (IKWG) has undertaken a systematic program to determine whether Ki67 immunohistochemistry can be analytically validated and standardized across laboratories. Technological advances and broader availability of devices for automated assessment of stained slides raise the possibility that these machines may improve on reproducibility of traditional pathologist-based visual Ki67 assessment.

Aims: To characterize reproducibility of automated machine-measured Ki67 expression using slides previously analyzed in the IKWG phase 3 study that evaluated reproducibility of visual Ki67 assessment.

Methods: Two sets of 30 previously stained slides containing core-cut biopsy sections of breast tumors were circulated to 14 laboratories for scanning and automated assessment of Ki67 expression. Sites were instructed to return average and maximum percentage of tumor cells positive for Ki67 for each slide, where maximum is designed to reflect “hot spot” analysis. Two laboratories returned scores from 2 operators; not all laboratories reported values for maximum Ki67 scores. Different operators were treated as distinct laboratories in analyses. Sixteen and 10 score sets were available for average and maximum Ki67 analyses, respectively, encompassing 7 unique scanner and 10 software platforms. Pre-specified analyses included evaluation of reproducibility across all laboratories as well as within a subgroup limited to those using Aperio scanners. The primary reproducibility metric was intraclass correlation coefficient between laboratories (ICC), regardless of device platform or software.

Results: Geometric means across 30 cases for 16 operators ranged from 11.06% to 38.11% with overall mean 16.75% (95% CI:14.45-19.42) for average scores. Geometric means for 10 operators ranged from 16.44% to 68.73% with overall mean 25.16% (95% CI: 18.71-33.84) for maximum scores. ICC for automated average scores across 16 operators was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.73-0.91) and ICC for maximum scores across 10 operators was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.44-0.80) although one outlier lab dramatically affected results. For the laboratories using the Aperio platform (8 score sets), ICC for automated average scores was 0.89 (95% CI; 0.81-0.96). These results are similar to ICC of 0.87 (95%CI; 0.81-0.93) reported using these same slides in the Phase 3 visual assessment reproducibility study in which observers counted 500 cells per slide (Leung et al, NPJBrCancer, in press).

Conclusions: Between-laboratory reproducibility for automated machine assessment of average Ki67 is similar to that for pathologist-based visual assessment of Ki67. However, the observed ICC was markedly numerically lower for the maximum score method compared to the average method, suggesting that the maximum score may not be useful as a reproducible measure of proliferation. Automated average scoring methods show promise for standardization of Ki67 scoring, supporting future studies to clinically validate Ki67.

Citation Format: Rimm DL, McShane LM, Leung SCY, Bai Y, Bane AL, Bartlett JMS, Bayani J, Chang MC, Dean M, Denkert C, Enwere E, Galderisi C, Gholap A, Hugh JC, Jadhav A, Kornaga E, Laurinavicius A, Levenson R, Lima J, Miller K, Pantanowitz L, Piper T, Ruan J, Srinivasan M, Virk S, Wu Y, Yang H, Hayes DF, Nielsen TO, Dowsett M. An international multicenter study to evaluate reproducibility of automated scoring methods for assessment of Ki67 in breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-03-01.

Abstract P4-21-40: In vitro and in vivo activity of HER2-targeted antibody-liposomal doxorubicin conjugate MM-302 in HER2-intermediate tumors

This abstract was withdrawn by the authors.

Abstract P6-12-04: Phase 1 study of the antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) SGN-LIV1A in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer

Background

LIV-1, a transmembrane protein and downstream target of STAT3, is highly expressed in breast cancer cells. It is associated with lymph node involvement and metastatic progression. SGN-LIV1A is an anti-LIV-1 antibody conjugated via a protease-cleavable linker to monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE). Upon binding to cell-surface LIV-1, SGN-LIV1A is internalized and releases MMAE, which binds to tubulin and induces G2/M arrest and apoptosis.

Methods

This is an ongoing, phase 1 dose-escalation study evaluating safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of SGN-LIV1A (q3 wks IV) in women with LIV-1-positive, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (LA/MBC) (NCT01969643). Patients (pts) with measurable disease and ≥2 prior cytotoxic regimens for LA/MBC were eligible. Pts with ≥Grade 2 neuropathy were excluded. Response was assessed per RECIST v1.1; pts with stable disease (SD) or better could continue treatment until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. At completion of dose escalation in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2–) and triple-negative (TN) pts, expansion cohorts were opened to further evaluate safety and antitumor activity of monotherapy in TN pts and combination therapy with trastuzumab (Tz) in HER2-positive (HER2+) pts. Pre- and post-treatment tumor biopsies were done to evaluate LIV-1 expression and other correlative endpoints.

Results

To date, 39 pts (18 HR+/HER2–, 21 TN) have received a median of 3 cycles (range, 1–10) of SGN-LIV1A monotherapy at doses of 0.5–2.8 mg/kg. Median age was 57 yrs (range, 33–79). At baseline, pts had a median of 4 prior cytotoxic regimens for LA/MBC (range, 2–8); 36 had visceral disease and 25 had bone involvement. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) occurred in 19 DLT-evaluable pts; maximum tolerated dose was not exceeded at 2.8 mg/kg. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) reported in ≥30% of pts were: fatigue (64%), nausea (54%), alopecia (46%), decreased appetite (41%), constipation (39%), neutropenia (33%), and vomiting (31%). Peripheral neuropathy was reported in 9 pts (23%). Most AEs were Grade 1/2, except neutropenia (all ≥Grade 3). Four pts discontinued treatment due to AEs (acute respiratory distress syndrome, nausea, pneumonia, tachycardia). In dose escalation, modest activity was observed in 17 efficacy evaluable (EE) HR+/HER2- pts, with a disease control rate (DCR) of 59% (10 SD), including 1 pt with SD≥24 wks. Among the 17 EE TN pts (dose escalation plus cohort expansion), the overall response rate (ORR) was 41% (7 PR), DCR was 82% (7 PR, 7 SD) and clinical benefit rate (CBR=OR+SD≥24 wks) was 53% (9 pts). For TN pts, median PFS was 17.1 wks (95% CI: 6.0, 18.4); 6 pts remain on treatment.

Of 281 MBC tumor samples evaluated for LIV-1, 93% were positive; 81% had moderate-to-high expression (H-score ≥100).

Conclusions

LIV-1 is expressed in almost all MBC tumors. SGN-LIV1A monotherapy has been generally well tolerated and shown encouraging antitumor activity in heavily pretreated TN MBC, with a PR rate of 41% and a CBR at ≥24 wks of 53%. Response duration data continue to evolve. Enrollment continues in the TN monotherapy expansion cohort and the HER2+ combination cohort with Tz.

Citation Format: Forero-Torres A, Modi S, Specht J, Miller K, Weise A, Burris III H, Liu M, Krop I, Pusztai L, Kostic A, Li M, Mita M. Phase 1 study of the antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) SGN-LIV1A in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-12-04.

Abstract P4-22-08: A single-arm phase 2 study to assess clinical activity, efficacy and safety of enzalutamide with trastuzumab in HER2+ AR+ metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer

Background:Androgen receptor (AR) expression has been observed in up to 77% of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive (HER2+) breast cancer (BC).References:1 Enzalutamide (ENZA) is a potent AR inhibitor approved for patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. In vitro, ENZA enhances antitumor activity of trastuzumab in HER2+ AR+ cell lines and inhibits proliferation in trastuzumab-resistant HER2+ cell lines.2

Methods:Pts with metastatic or locally advanced BC that was HER2+ AR+ by local or central laboratory assessment were enrolled in a single-arm, Simon 2-stage phase 2 study (NCT02091960). Key eligibility criteria included availability of a tissue sample, presence of measurable or evaluable disease per RECIST v1.1, progression on prior trastuzumab and ≥1 prior line of anti-HER2 therapy as the most recent regimen. Brain metastases and history of seizure were exclusionary. Evaluable pts were those with centrally confirmed nuclear AR expression≥10% by immunohistochemistry who received ≥1 dose of ENZA and had ≥1 postbaseline tumor assessment. Pts received ENZA 160 mg daily and trastuzumab 6 mg/kg every 21 days until disease progression. The primary objective was clinical benefit rate at 24 weeks (CBR24), defined as complete or partial response (CR or PR) or stable disease (SD) for ≥24 weeks in evaluable pts. Additional endpoints included safety and progression-free survival (PFS). CBR24 in ≥3 of 21 evaluable pts was required to continue to stage 2 and enrollment of up to 66 evaluable pts total. This design yields a 1-sided type 1 error of 5% and 90% power when the true response is 25%.

Results:Here we present results from stage 1 (data cutoff: Mar 23, 2016), with 22 evaluable pts enrolled (pts 21 and 22 enrolled simultaneously); 18 had received ≥4 prior lines of therapy. Median duration of ENZA exposure was 144 days (range, 22-495), mean number of complete trastuzumab infusions was 6.5. CBR24 was 27.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.7-50.2); 2 confirmed PR and 4 SD ≥24 weeks. Median PFS was 108 days (95% CI, 56-144). All pts experienced ≥1 adverse event (AE) any grade; 5 pts experienced AEs grade ≥3. ENZA-related AEs were reported in 16 pts (72.7%), the most common (in ≥10% of pts) were fatigue (22.7%), nausea (18.2%), diarrhea (13.6%) and arthralgia (13.6%). Serious AEs were reported in 6 pts (27.3%; 2 each of infection and back pain, 1 each of abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, pyrexia, urinary retention and pulmonary edema). Two pts discontinued due to drug-related AEs: 1 related to both drugs, 1 related to trastuzumab. One on-study death from pulmonary edema was reported, which was not considered related to either drug.

Conclusion:Stage 1 met its primary objective. No new safety signals were identified, and the safety profile in this study was similar to that in men with prostate cancer and women with other BC subtypes treated with ENZA. These results are encouraging for a heavily pretreated population with advanced HER2+ AR+ BC. Enrollment in stage 2 continues with the combination of ENZA and trastuzumab.

1. Micello D et al. Virchows Arch. 2010;457:467-476.

2. Richer J. Presented at AACR Advances in Breast Cancer, San Diego, CA, 2013.

Citation Format: Krop I, Cortes J, Miller K, Huizing MT, Provencher L, Gianni L, Chan S, Trudeau M, Steinberg J, Sugg J, Liosatos M, Paton VE, Peterson A, Wardley A. A single-arm phase 2 study to assess clinical activity, efficacy and safety of enzalutamide with trastuzumab in HER2+ AR+ metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-22-08.

[Strategies for First-Line Treatment of mCRPC]

At present, abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide are the most commonly used substances in the first-line treatment of asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic metastatic castration-resistant prostate carcinoma (mCRPC). Since the relevant pivotal trials have demonstrated comparable clinical efficacy for both substances, further factors should be considered for the choice of treatment. As mCRPC patients usually receive several lines of treatment, different adaptation and resistance mechanisms leading to treatment failure could be important. This is indicated by daily routine observations and some initial clinical studies on resistance and different sequences of therapy. However, until the clinical relevance has been confirmed, it is mostly adverse events and comorbidities that are taken into account for the choice of first-line therapy. Also potential interactions with comedications and patient preferences should be considered. In the first-line treatment of mCRPC, ongoing discussions not only centre around the choice of medication for first-line mCRPC therapy, but also around the point in time they are started. For abiraterone acetate, for example, there is confirmed evidence that patients may benefit from early use within the approved indication. If the clinical importance of the different resistance mechanisms and differences in efficacy of various sequences could be confirmed, this would be a strong argument for therapy decisions and should therefore be further analysed in prospective clinical studies.

[Implications of PI-RADS Version 1 and Updated Version 2 on the Scoring of Prostatic Lesions in Multiparametric MRI]

BACKGROUND

A revised version of the PI-RADS scoring system has been introduced and score-related variability between version 1 and 2 may be suspected. This study aimed to assess the PI-RADS scores derived from version 1 (v1) and the updated version 2 (v2).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

61 patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer (PCa) and 90 lesions detected on pre-biopsy 3-Tesla multiparametric MRI were included in this retrospective analysis. 2 experienced radiologists scored all lesions in consensus. Lesion scores differing between PI-RADS v1 and v2 were further analyzed. Histology data from radical prostatectomy (RP) were included when available.

RESULTS

The PI-RADS v1 and v2 score differed in 52% of patients (32/61) and in 39% of lesions (35/90). On a lesion basis, the reason for the differences were related to sum score in v1 vs. categorical system in v2 in 51% (18/35) of lesions, cutoff between PI-RADS 4 and 5 based on lesion size in v2 as opposed to the sum score in v1 in 31% (11/35) and were inconclusive in 17% (6/35). The RP subgroup indicates enhanced detection of PCas with GS 3+3 and GS 3+4 in v2.

CONCLUSION

PI-RADS scores of prostatic lesions frequently differed between v1 and v2, the major reasons for these differences being score-related. In men undergoing RP, PI-RADS v2 improved detection of low risk PCa, but did not increase accuracy for discrimination of GS 3+4 vs. GS≥4+3 compared to v1. Urologists should be aware of the system-related differences when interpreting PI-RADS scores.