The design and evaluation of hybrid controlled trials that leverage external data and randomization

Patient-level data from completed clinical studies or electronic health records can be used in the design and analysis of clinical trials. However, these external data can bias the evaluation of the experimental treatment when the statistical design does not appropriately account for potential confounders. In this work, we introduce a hybrid clinical trial design that combines the use of external control datasets and randomization to experimental and control arms, with the aim of producing efficient inference on the experimental treatment effects. Our analysis of the hybrid trial design includes scenarios where the distributions of measured and unmeasured prognostic patient characteristics differ across studies. Using simulations and datasets from clinical studies in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer and glioblastoma, we illustrate the potential advantages of hybrid trial designs compared to externally controlled trials and randomized trial designs.

Patient-level external control data from prior clinical studies or electronic health records can be used in the design and analysis of clinical trials. Here the authors report a hybrid trial design combining the use of external control data and randomization to test experimental treatments, using small cell lung cancer and glioblastoma datasets as examples.

World Health Organization 2021 Classification of Central Nervous System Tumors and Implications for Therapy for Adult-Type Gliomas: A Review

Importance

Previous histologic classifications of brain tumors have been limited by discrepancies in diagnoses reported by neuropathologists and variability in outcomes and response to therapies. Such diagnostic discrepancies have impaired clinicians' ability to select the most appropriate therapies for patients and have allowed heterogeneous populations of patients to be enrolled in clinical trials, hindering the development of more effective therapies. In adult-type diffuse gliomas, histologic classification has a particularly important effect on clinical care.

Observations

In 2021, the World Health Organization published the fifth edition of the Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System. This classification incorporates advances in understanding the molecular pathogenesis of brain tumors with histopathology in order to group tumors into more biologically and molecularly defined entities. As such, tumor classification is significantly improved through better characterized natural histories. These changes have particularly important implications for gliomas. For the first time, adult- and pediatric-type gliomas are classified separately on the basis of differences in molecular pathogenesis and prognosis. Furthermore, the previous broad category of adult-type diffuse gliomas has been consolidated into 3 types: astrocytoma, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant; oligodendroglioma, IDH mutant and 1p/19q codeleted; and glioblastoma, IDH wild type. These major changes are driven by IDH mutation status and include the restriction of the diagnosis of glioblastoma to tumors that are IDH wild type; the reclassification of tumors previously diagnosed as IDH-mutated glioblastomas as astrocytomas IDH mutated, grade 4; and the requirement for the presence of IDH mutations to classify tumors as astrocytomas or oligodendrogliomas.

Conclusions and Relevance

The 2021 World Health Organization central nervous system tumor classification is a major advance toward improving the diagnosis of brain tumors. It will provide clinicians with more accurate guidance on prognosis and optimal therapy for patients and ensure that more homogenous patient populations are enrolled in clinical trials, potentially facilitating the development of more effective therapies.

Single cell spatial analysis reveals the topology of immunomodulatory purinergic signaling in glioblastoma

How the glioma immune microenvironment fosters tumorigenesis remains incompletely defined. Here, we use single-cell RNA-sequencing and multiplexed tissue-imaging to characterize the composition, spatial organization, and clinical significance of extracellular purinergic signaling in glioma. We show that microglia are the predominant source of CD39, while tumor cells principally express CD73. In glioblastoma, CD73 is associated with EGFR amplification, astrocyte-like differentiation, and increased adenosine, and is linked to hypoxia. Glioblastomas enriched for CD73 exhibit inflammatory microenvironments, suggesting that purinergic signaling regulates immune adaptation. Spatially-resolved single-cell analyses demonstrate a strong spatial correlation between tumor-CD73 and microglial-CD39, with proximity associated with poor outcomes. Similar spatial organization is present in pediatric high-grade gliomas including H3K27M-mutant diffuse midline glioma. These data reveal that purinergic signaling in gliomas is shaped by genotype, lineage, and functional state, and that core enzymes expressed by tumor and myeloid cells are organized to promote adenosine-rich microenvironments potentially amenable to therapeutic targeting.

EANO - EURACAN - SNO Guidelines on circumscribed astrocytic gliomas, glioneuronal, and neuronal tumors

In the new WHO 2021 Classification of CNS Tumors the chapter "Circumscribed astrocytic gliomas, glioneuronal and neuronal tumors" encompasses several different rare tumor entities, which occur more frequently in children, adolescents, and young adults. The Task Force has reviewed the evidence of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, which is low particularly for adult patients, and draw recommendations accordingly. Tumor diagnosis, based on WHO 2021, is primarily performed using conventional histological techniques; however, a molecular workup is important for differential diagnosis, in particular, DNA methylation profiling for the definitive classification of histologically unresolved cases. Molecular factors are increasing of prognostic and predictive importance. MRI finding are non-specific, but for some tumors are characteristic and suggestive. Gross total resection, when feasible, is the most important treatment in terms of prolonging survival and achieving long-term seizure control. Conformal radiotherapy should be considered in grade 3 and incompletely resected grade 2 tumors. In recurrent tumors reoperation and radiotherapy, including stereotactic radiotherapy, can be useful. Targeted therapies may be used in selected patients: BRAF and MEK inhibitors in pilocytic astrocytomas, pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas, and gangliogliomas when BRAF altered, and mTOR inhibitor everolimus in subependymal giant cells astrocytomas. Sequencing to identify molecular targets is advocated for diagnostic clarification and to direct potential targeted therapies.

Hypothetical generalized framework for a new imaging endpoint of therapeutic activity in early phase clinical trials in brain tumors

Imaging response assessment is a cornerstone of patient care and drug development in oncology. Clinicians/clinical researchers rely on tumor imaging to estimate the impact of new treatments and guide decision making for patients and candidate therapies. This is important in brain cancer, where associations between tumor size/growth and emerging neurological deficits are strong. Accurately measuring the impact of a new therapy on tumor growth early in clinical development, where patient numbers are small, would be valuable for decision making regarding late-stage development activation. Current attempts to measure the impact of a new therapy have limited influence on clinical development, as determination of progression, stability or response does not currently account for individual tumor growth kinetics prior to the initiation of experimental therapies. Therefore, we posit that imaging-based response assessment, often used as a tool for estimating clinical effect, is incomplete as it does not adequately account for growth trajectories or biological characteristics of tumors prior to the introduction of an investigational agent. Here, we propose modifications to the existing framework for evaluating imaging assessment in primary brain tumors that will provide a more reliable understanding of treatment effects. Measuring tumor growth trajectories prior to a given intervention may allow us to more confidently conclude whether there is an anti-tumor effect. This updated approach to imaging-based tumor response assessment is intended to improve our ability to select candidate therapies for later-stage development, including those that may not meet currently sought thresholds for "response" and ultimately lead to identification of effective treatments.

Clinical utility of targeted next-generation sequencing assay in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma for therapy decision-making

BACKGROUND

Targeted gene NGS testing is available through many academic institutions and commercial entities and is increasingly incorporated in practice guidelines for glioblastoma (GBM). This single-center retrospective study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of incorporating NGS results in the management of GBM patients at a clinical trials-focused academic center.

METHODS

We identified 1011 consecutive adult patients with pathologically confirmed GBM (IDHwt or IDHmut) who had somatic tumor sequencing (Oncopanel, ~500 cancer gene panel) at DFCI from 2013-2019. Clinical records of all IDHwt GBM patients were reviewed to capture clinical trial enrollment and off-label targeted therapy use based on NGS results.

RESULTS

Of the 557 IDHwt GBM patients with sequencing, 182 entered clinical trials at diagnosis (32.7%) and 213 (38.2%) entered after recurrence. Sequencing results for 130 patients (23.3%) were utilized for clinical trial enrollment for either targeted therapy indications (6.9 % upfront and 27.7% at recurrent clinical trials and 3.1% for off-label targeted therapy) or exploratory studies (55.4% upfront and 6.9% recurrent clinical trials). Median overall survival was 20.1 months with no survival difference seen between patients enrolled in clinical trials compared to those who were not, in a posthoc analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

While NGS testing has become essential for improved molecular diagnostics, our study illustrates that targeted gene panels remain underutilized for selecting therapy in GBM-IDHwt. Targeted therapy and clinical trial design remain to be improved to help leverage the potential of NGS in clinical care.

Clinical implications of the 2021 edition of the WHO classification of central nervous system tumours

A new edition of the WHO classification of tumours of the CNS was published in 2021. Although the previous edition of this classification was published just 5 years earlier, in 2016, rapid advances in our understanding of the molecular underpinnings of CNS tumours, including the diversity of clinically relevant molecular types and subtypes, necessitated a new classification system. Compared with the 2016 scheme, the new classification incorporates even more molecular alterations into the diagnosis of many tumours and reorganizes gliomas into adult-type diffuse gliomas, paediatric-type diffuse low-grade and high-grade gliomas, circumscribed astrocytic gliomas, and ependymal tumours. A number of new entities are incorporated into the 2021 classification, especially tumours that preferentially or exclusively arise in the paediatric population. Such a substantial revision of the WHO scheme will have major implications for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with CNS tumours. In this Perspective, we summarize the main changes in the classification of diffuse and circumscribed gliomas, ependymomas, embryonal tumours and meningiomas, and discuss how each change will influence post-surgical treatment, clinical trial enrolment and cooperative studies. Although the 2021 WHO classification of CNS tumours is a major conceptual advance, its implementation on a routine clinical basis presents some challenges that will require innovative solutions.

Circulating Immune Cell and Outcome Analysis from the Phase II Study of PD-L1 Blockade with Durvalumab for Newly Diagnosed and Recurrent Glioblastoma

PURPOSE

PD-L1 is upregulated in glioblastoma and supports immunosuppression. We evaluated PD-L1 blockade with durvalumab among glioblastoma cohorts and investigated potential biomarkers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

MGMT unmethylated newly diagnosed patients received radiotherapy plus durvalumab (cohort A; n = 40). Bevacizumab-naïve, recurrent patients received durvalumab alone (cohort B; n = 31) or in combination with standard bevacizumab (cohort B2; n = 33) or low-dose bevacizumab (cohort B3; n = 33). Bevacizumab-refractory patients received durvalumab plus bevacizumab (cohort C; n = 22). Primary endpoints were: OS-12 (A), PFS-6 (B, B2, B3), and OS-6 (C). Exploratory biomarkers included: a systematic, quantitative, and phenotypic evaluation of circulating immune cells; tumor mutational burden (TMB); and tumor immune activation signature (IAS).

RESULTS

No cohort achieved the primary efficacy endpoint. Outcome was comparable among recurrent, bevacizumab-naïve cohorts. No unexpected toxicities were observed. A widespread reduction of effector immune cell subsets was noted among recurrent patients compared with newly diagnosed patients that was partially due to dexamethasone use. A trend of increased CD8+Ki67+ T cells at day 15 was noted among patients who achieved the primary endpoint and were not on dexamethasone. Neither TMB nor IAS predicted outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with recurrent glioblastoma have markedly lower baseline levels of multiple circulating immune cell subsets compared with newly diagnosed patients. An early increase in systemic Ki67+CD8+ cells may warrant further evaluation as a potential biomarker of therapeutic benefit among patients with glioblastoma undergoing checkpoint therapy. Dexamethasone decreased immune cell subsets. PD-L1 blockade and combination with standard or reduced dose bevacizumab was ineffective.

ASCEND-7: Efficacy and Safety of Ceritinib Treatment in Patients with ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic to the Brain and/or Leptomeninges

PURPOSE

Central nervous system metastases are a prominent cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with ALK-positive (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The phase II ASCEND-7 (NCT02336451) study was specifically designed to assess the efficacy and safety of the ALK inhibitor (ALKi) ceritinib in patients with ALK+ NSCLC metastatic to the brain and/or leptomeninges.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with active brain metastases were allocated to study arms 1 to 4 based on prior exposure to an ALKi and/or prior brain radiation (arm 1: prior radiotherapy/ALKi-pretreated; arm 2: no radiotherapy/ALKi-pretreated; arm 3: prior radiotherapy/ALKi-naïve; arm 4: no radiotherapy/ALKi-naïve). Arm 5 included patients with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. Patients received ceritinib 750 mg once daily (fasted condition). Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed whole-body overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR) and intracranial/extracranial responses.

RESULTS

Per investigator assessment, in arms 1 (n = 42), 2 (n = 40), 3 (n = 12), and 4 (n = 44), respectively: whole-body ORRs [95% confidence interval (CI)] were 35.7% (21.6-52.0), 30.0% (16.6-46.5), 50.0% (21.1-78.9), and 59.1% (43.2-73.7); whole-body DCR (95% CI): 66.7% (50.5-80.4), 82.5% (67.2-92.7), 66.7% (34.9-90.1), and 70.5% (54.8-83.2); intracranial ORRs (95% CI): 39.3% (21.5-59.4), 27.6% (12.7-47.2), 28.6% (3.7-71.0), and 51.5% (33.5-69.2). In arm 5 (n = 18), whole-body ORR was 16.7% (95% CI, 3.6-41.4) and DCR was 66.7% (95% CI, 41.0-86.7). Paired cerebrospinal fluid and plasma sampling revealed that ceritinib penetrated the human blood-brain barrier.

CONCLUSIONS

Ceritinib showed antitumor activity in patients with ALK+ NSCLC with active brain metastases and/or leptomeningeal disease, and could be considered in the management of intracranial disease. See related commentary by Murciano-Goroff et al., p. 2477.

Investigational PET tracers in neuro-oncology-What's on the horizon? A report of the PET/RANO group

Many studies in patients with brain tumors evaluating innovative PET tracers have been published in recent years, and the initial results are promising. Here, the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) PET working group provides an overview of the literature on novel investigational PET tracers for brain tumor patients. Furthermore, newer indications of more established PET tracers for the evaluation of glucose metabolism, amino acid transport, hypoxia, cell proliferation, and others are also discussed. Based on the preliminary findings, these novel investigational PET tracers should be further evaluated considering their promising potential. In particular, novel PET probes for imaging of translocator protein and somatostatin receptor overexpression as well as for immune system reactions appear to be of additional clinical value for tumor delineation and therapy monitoring. Progress in developing these radiotracers may contribute to improving brain tumor diagnostics and advancing clinical translational research.

OTHR-08. Pediatric Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-oncology (pNANO) Scale: A tool to assess neurologic function for Response Assessment in Neuro-oncology (RAPNO)

Background: The Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (NANO) scale, a standardized metric to objectively measure neurologic function in adult brain tumor patients, complements radiographic assessment in evaluating outcomes of neuro-oncology patients in clinical trials and clinical practice. Currently, there is no standardized measure for neurologic function in pediatric neuro-oncology patients despite their distinct clinical presentations and tumor locations. Therefore, we developed a dedicated pediatric NANO (pNANO) scale. Methods: An international group of pediatric neurologists and adult and pediatric neuro-oncologists convened bi-weekly over 5 months to draft the pNANO scale as an objective and quantifiable measure of neurologic function in children that can be administered during routine examination by pediatric-trained providers of any sub-specialty and be utilized together with other indicators to assess response in clinical trials. Results: Ten relevant domains of neurologic function were identified based on common pediatric brain tumor locations: gait, strength, cerebellar function, visual fields, visual acuity, facial strength, level of consciousness, extraocular movements, dysarthria and dysphagia. For each domain, developmental age appropriate levels of function were defined and categorized. Each domain, based on direct observation and testing during any routine neurological exam, can be used for longitudinal monitoring. Conclusions: The pNANO scale has been developed and aims to provide an objective metric of neurologic function for pediatric brain tumor patients. This scale will be tested for reliability, feasibility and inter-observer variability. Consistent evaluation of neurologic function using pNANO along with radiographic assessment will enable more comprehensive and standardized response assessment in pediatric neuro-oncology patients enrolled in clinical trials.

A study of neo-adjuvant and adjuvant ofra-vec (VB-111) for treatment of surgically accessible recurrent GBM

TPS2075

Background: Ofranergene obadenovec (ofra-vec, VB-111) is an anti-cancer gene based immune activator and targeted vascular disruptor. The dual mechanism of action triggers a broad antiangiogenic effect and induces of a tumor directed immune response. A previous study demonstrated a survival benefit for patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) treated with ofra-vec monotherapy, that was continued after progression in combination with bevacizumab. Glioblastoma is an immunologically “cold” microenvironment which fosters immunosuppression and antagonizes anti-tumor immune responses. The role of T-cell infiltration in combating cancer has been increasingly recognized and associated with improved participant outcomes. Based on these observations, this study will assess the hypothesis that neoadjuvant use of ofra-vec will lead to a statistically significant increase in tumor infiltrating T lymphocyte (TIL) density within the tumor and enhanced systemic tumor-specific T cell responses. Methods: Study NCT04406272 is a multicenter, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 2 surgical trial to evaluate early immunologic pharmacodynamic parameters for the viral cancer therapy ofra-vec in rGBM. 45 participants with rGBM indicated for resection will randomized to one of three treatment arms: Neoadjuvant Arm: intravenous ofra-vec prior to resection, and ofra-vec every 6 weeks after resection. Adjuvant Arm: placebo prior to resection, and ofra-vec every 6 weeks afterwards. The control arm will receive placebo prior to resection followed by standard of care. Upon evidence of contrast-enhancing progression, bevacizumab may be initiated as needed for supportive care; however, ofra-vec will continue until progression is supported at two consecutive time points. Tumor samples will be obtained and archived at the time of surgery, and blood samples will be obtained as pharmacodynamic markers throughout the study to allow DNA sequencing of T cells. The primary endpoint is to evaluate the influence of neoadjuvant ofra-vec on TIL density. Other endpoints include safety and tolerability, peripheral T cell response, 6mPFS and OS. Study is open for enrolment. Clinical trial information: NCT04406272.

Evaluation of the response assessment criteria in newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma

2020

Background: The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) and modified RANO (mRANO) criteria are the two most widely used criteria to evaluate treatment response in glioblastoma (GBM) clinical trials. Unlike RANO, mRANO omits the evaluation of FLAIR sequence and requires a repeat scan to confirm responses. It also uses the post-radiation (RT) MRI as a baseline MRI in the newly diagnosed setting instead of the pre-RT MRI used in RANO. We sought to compare the 2 response assessment criteria and evaluate the differences between them in a large patient population. We also sought to compare them to immunotherapy RANO (iRANO) in patients who received immunotherapy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of consecutive patients with newly diagnosed (nGBM) and recurrent (rGBM) IDH wild-type GBM treated at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute from 2014 to 2020. Bidimensional measurements of enhancing disease and evaluation of FLAIR sequences were performed by two independent readers on patients’ brain MRIs obtained before change of treatment, and discrepancies were evaluated by a third reader. Dates of disease progression (PD) were identified using RANO, mRANO, iRANO, and other response assessment criteria variations. Spearman’s correlations between PFS and OS were calculated using an iterative multiple imputation method to account for any right-censoring. Results: 526 and 580 patients were included in the newly diagnosed and recurrent cohorts, respectively. Spearman’s correlations were not significantly different between RANO and mRANO in the nGBM (0.69 [95% CI 0.62 to 0.75] vs. 0.67 [0.60, 0.73]) and rGBM (0.45 [0.37, 0.52] vs. 0.50 [0.42, 0.57]) cohorts. Evaluation of FLAIR sequences did not improve the correlation between PFS and OS in patients who received antiangiogenic therapy. Addition of confirmation scans was associated with stronger Spearman’s correlations only when PD was identified within 12 weeks of completion of RT in the nGBM cohort, but did not affect the Spearman’s correlations in the rGBM cohort. The use of the post-RT MRI as a baseline was associated with a higher Spearman’s correlation in nGBM than the use of pre-RT MRI (0.67 [0.60, 0.73] vs. 0.53 [0.42, 0.62]). Among 98 patients with nGBM and 175 patients with rGBM who received immunotherapy, the Spearman’s correlations (nGBM and rGBM) with iRANO (0.63 [0.44, 0.76] and 0.34 [0.17, 0.49]) were similar to RANO (0.73 [0.60, 0.82] and 0.42 [0.28, 0.54]) and mRANO (0.65 [0.48, 0.77] and 0.43 [0.28, 0.56]). Conclusions: RANO and mRANO demonstrated similar correlation between PFS and OS. The evaluation of FLAIR can be omitted, while confirmation scans appear to be only beneficial in the nGBM settings during the first 12 weeks of completion of RT. There was a nonsignificant trend in favor of the use of post-RT MRI as the baseline scan in the nGBM setting. The application of iRANO criteria did not add significant benefit in patients who received immunotherapy.

Comparison of survival outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated with standard chemoradiation in and outside of clinical trials

2051

Background: Randomized clinical trials use stringent eligibility criteria to select patients which can raise concerns about generalizability of study results. Recent interest in external controls and new trial designs has increasingly focused on the possible use of real-world data sources. We examined potential differences of survival outcomes in clinical trial and real-world datasets in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Methods: Patient-level data from 4 independent datasets were analyzed. Non-trial data were derived from an institutional dataset of 453 patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated outside of a clinical trial with standard radiation therapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide at a large academic center. Trial patients included patients on the control arm of several multi-institutional trials (NCT00689221, n = 273; NCT00813943, n = 89; NCT00943826; n = 459) and patients treated on trial at our institution (n = 210). Non-trial patients were compared with each of the 4 clinical trial datasets in pairwise comparisons with Cox regression with adjustments for age, sex, extent of resection, KPS and MGMT status. Results: Patient-level data from 1,484 patients were analyzed. Non-trial patients were older compared to patients in the multi-institutional trials (mean 58.6 vs. 56.1 years (NCT00943826), 53.9 years (NCT00813943), 55.7 years (NCT00689221); p < = 0.001). The non-trial cohort had fewer women (43.5% vs. 35.9%, p = 0.02), greater proportion of lower KPS patients (47% KPS <90 vs. 31% KPS <90, p < 0.001) and greater proportion of MGMT methylated patients (49% vs. 33%, p < 0.001) compared to NCT00943826 patients. There were no other significant differences between patient characteristics of non-trial patients and the 4 trial datasets. Trial participation was not associated with improved survival in multivariable analysis after adjustments for clinical covariates (non-trial patients vs. each trial dataset; Table, P > 0.05). Conclusions: Glioblastoma patients treated on multi-institutional clinical trials that were included in our analysis did not have statistically significant differences in survival compared to patients treated outside of a clinical trial at a large academic center after adjustment for relevant variables. Our findings support the possible use of real-world data in the development of external control arms for future trials in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. [Table: see text]

GBM AGILE: A global, phase 2/3 adaptive platform trial to evaluate multiple regimens in newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma

TPS2078

Background: GBM AGILE (Glioblastoma Adaptive, Global, Innovative Learning Environment) is a biomarker based, multi-arm, international, seamless Phase 2/3 Response Adaptive Randomization platform trial designed to rapidly identify experimental therapies that improve overall survival and confirm efficacious experimental therapies and associated biomarker signatures to support new drug approvals and registration. GBM AGILE is a collaboration between academic investigators, patient organizations and industry to support new drug applications for newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM. With its adaptable structure, GBM AGILE has continued trial activation, inclusion of new investigational therapies, and enrollment globally through the challenges of a global pandemic. Methods: The primary objective of GBM AGILE is to identify therapies that effectively improve the overall survival in patients with ND or recurrent GBM. Bayesian response adaptive randomization is used within subtypes of the disease to assign participants to investigational arms based on their performance. Operating under a Master Protocol, GBM AGILE allows multiple drugs from different pharmaceutical/biotech companies to be evaluated simultaneously and/or over time against a common control. New experimental therapies are added as new information about promising new drugs is identified while other therapies are removed as they complete their evaluation. The master protocol/ trial infrastructure includes efficiencies through an adaptive trial design, shared control arm and operational processes such as risk-based monitoring and enhanced remote activities. GBM AGILE has screened over 1000 patients and enrollment rates are 3 to 4 times greater than traditional GBM trials, with active sites averaging 0.75 to 1 patients/sites/month. While enrollment had an initial dip during the early stages of the pandemic (April-May, 2020), with flexible processes including remote based monitoring, minimizing in person visits, and remote provision of IMP, the enrollment rebounded by June, 2020. Through the use of improved and efficient processes allowed within a master protocol/adaptive platform trial infrastructure, GBM AGILE has been seamlessly operating a global trial during a global pandemic. Clinical trial information: NCT03970447.

Infigratinib in Patients with Recurrent Gliomas and FGFR Alterations: A Multicenter Phase II Study

PURPOSE

FGFR genomic alterations (amplification, mutations, and/or fusions) occur in ∼8% of gliomas, particularly FGFR1 and FGFR3. We conducted a multicenter open-label, single-arm, phase II study of a selective FGFR1-3 inhibitor, infigratinib (BGJ398), in patients with FGFR-altered recurrent gliomas.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Adults with recurrent/progressive gliomas harboring FGFR alterations received oral infigratinib 125 mg on days 1 to 21 of 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate by Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria. Comprehensive genomic profiling was performed on available pretreatment archival tissue to explore additional molecular correlations with efficacy.

RESULTS

Among 26 patients, the 6-month PFS rate was 16.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.0-32.5], median PFS was 1.7 months (95% CI, 1.1-2.8), and objective response rate was 3.8%. However, 4 patients had durable disease control lasting longer than 1 year. Among these, 3 had tumors harboring activating point mutations at analogous positions of FGFR1 (K656E; n = 2) or FGFR3 (K650E; n = 1) in pretreatment tissue; an FGFR3-TACC3 fusion was detected in the other. Hyperphosphatemia was the most frequently reported treatment-related adverse event (all-grade, 76.9%; grade 3, 3.8%) and is a known on-target toxicity of FGFR inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

FGFR inhibitor monotherapy with infigratinib had limited efficacy in a population of patients with recurrent gliomas and different FGFR genetic alterations, but durable disease control lasting more than 1 year was observed in patients with tumors harboring FGFR1 or FGFR3 point mutations or FGFR3-TACC3 fusions. A follow-up study with refined biomarker inclusion criteria and centralized FGFR testing is warranted.

Paxalisib in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with unmethylated MGMT promoter status: Final phase 2 study results

2047

Background: Paxalisib, a potent oral selective brain-penetrant small molecule PI3K/mTOR inhibitor, has shown activity in nonclinical brain cancer models and promising phase 1 data in progressive / recurrent high-grade gliomas (NCT01547546). This multicenter phase 2 progressive design trial (NCT03522298) aimed to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for once-daily (QD) dosing, and to evaluate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and clinical activity of paxalisib in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and unmethylated MGMT promotor status. Methods: Eligible patients were males or females, aged ≥18 years, who had undergone surgical resection and chemoradiotherapy (Stupp Regimen), and were considered to be progression free before starting adjuvant paxalisib. Stage 1 used a standard 3+3 dose-escalation design to determine the MTD in this population. Stage 2 was a two-arm, open-label, expansion cohort with patients randomized 1:1 to receive paxalisib at the MTD under fed or fasted conditions. In both stages, treatment comprised daily paxalisib administered in 28-day cycles, continuously until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Efficacy analyses are based on investigator review and from date of diagnosis. Results: Patients (n = 30; 70.0% males, 83.3% white, mean age 58.5 years) had a mean time since diagnosis of 3.75 months. The majority (n = 29) received between 1 and 6 treatment cycles and one received 29 cycles. In Stage 1 (n = 9), an MTD of 60mg was established on the dose-limiting toxicities of hyperglycemia (n = 1) and stomatitis (n = 1) at 75mg. Paxalisib at 60mg was well-tolerated and adverse events were consistent with other PI3K inhibitor medicines. At the MTD (60mg), the PK profile was linear and dose-proportional with no differences in Tmax and elimination half-life under fed and fasted conditions. For the overall ITT population, the median progression free survival was 8.4 months (RANO) and 8.6 months (mRANO) and the median overall survival was 15.7 months. In a mITT (n = 22 patients treated with 60mg daily and ≥1 post-baseline assessment), the median PFS was 9.6 months (mRANO). Conclusions: The primary study endpoints were met; PK and safety were consistent with prior clinical experience. The MTD showed encouraging clinical activity, prolonging PFS and improving OS. Further efficacy confirmation of paxalisib 60 mg QD in newly diagnosed glioblastoma in a pivotal trial is ongoing (GBM AGILE, NCT03970447). Clinical trial information: NCT03522298.

Phase 2 trial of bavituximab with chemoradiation and adjuvant temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma

2030

Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) and tumor endothelial cells express phosphatidylserine (PS), a highly immunosuppressive membrane phospholipid. PS receptors engage with immune cells, leading to expansion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) which promote an immunosuppressive and pro-angiogenic tumor microenvironment. Bavituximab (BAV) – a chimeric monoclonal antibody – binds to β2-glycoprotein 1 (β2-GP1) to form a complex of β2-GP1 with PS, resulting in immune activation against tumor cells and anti-angiogenic effects. Pre-clinical data in GBM models suggest synergistic effects of PS blockade, radiation (RT), and temozolomide (TMZ). Here, we present results from a phase II trial (NCT03139916) of BAV, RT and TMZ in GBM patients. Methods: 33 adults with newly diagnosed IDH-wild-type GBM were enrolled and received 6 weeks of RT+TMZ, followed by 6 cycles of TMZ. BAV (3 mg/kg) was given weekly, starting at week 1 of RT+TMZ, for 18 weeks with the option to continue if tolerated. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients alive at 12 months (OS-12). The null hypothesis would be rejected if OS-12 was ≥ 72%. As an exploratory endpoint, the immune profile in tumor tissue and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was assessed using nanoString and multispectral immunofluorescence, with the goal to assess on-target effects of BAV in longer vs. shorter surviving patients (split based on median survival). Relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) from dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI was also obtained. Results: 24 patients were alive at 12 months and OS-12 was 73% (95% CI 59-90%) so the study met its primary endpoint. Median OS was 15.4 months. As best response, 79% of patients had stable disease, 12% had a partial response and 9% had progressive disease. Eight grade 3 or 4 adverse events were seen (no grade 5 AEs). Ten pre-treatment and 7 post-treatment tissue samples were available. Analysis of RNA from pre-treatment tumor specimens showed a significantly positive shift in myeloid-related gene expression in patients with longer survival, with enrichment of 116 and 120 transcripts as well as downregulation of 2 and 1 gene for PFS and OS, respectively. There was no differential expression in PBMCs. Including all tissue samples, there was a marked reduction of MDSCs after BAV compared to time of diagnosis (p = 0.011). Decreased rCBF post-RT/pre-cycle 1 TMZ was associated with improved OS (HR 4.63, p = 0.029). Conclusions: OS-12 was 73%, meeting the primary endpoint and suggesting potential activity of BAV in newly diagnosed GBM. BAV leads to on-target depletion of intratumoral immunosuppressive MDSCs and anti-angiogenic effects. As expected, based on the mechanism of action of BAV, there was no difference in PBMC gene expression profile in patients with long and short survival. Combining BAV with immune checkpoint inhibitors in the future may augment tumor immune response. Clinical trial information: NCT03139916.

Phase 1/2 dose escalation study of NUV-422, a potent inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases 2, 4, and 6, in recurrent or refractory (r/r) high-grade gliomas (HGG) and solid tumors

TPS3173

Background: CDKs that govern the G1-S transition of the cell cycle (CDK2, CDK4 and CDK6) are deregulated in many cancers. CDK2 expression, in particular, is associated with worse overall survival in glioblastoma (GB), disease-free recurrence in prostate cancer, and resistance to approved CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in breast cancer. These provide rationale for inhibition of CDK2/4/6 as a potential novel therapeutic strategy in these cancers. NUV-422 is a potent (low nM) small molecule CDK2/4/6i with limited activity against CDK1, a target potentially associated with toxicities in other CDKi. Preclinical studies have shown that NUV-422 has favorable blood-brain barrier penetration, inhibited growth of multiple glioma cell lines in vitro, and exhibited antitumor activity in GB xenograft models. NUV-422 also exhibited antitumor activity in multiple patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of HR+ HER2- mBC resistant to CDK4/6i, and PDX models of prostate cancer resistant to anti-androgens. Methods: NUV-422-02 (NCT04541225) is a phase 1/2, first in human, open label, multicenter study to evaluate single-agent NUV-422 (given orally) in patients with advanced solid tumors (r/r HGG, r/r HR+ HER2- mBC, or r/r mCRPC). The Ph 1 dose escalation will use a 3+3 design to evaluate safety, tolerability, and PK of NUV-422 and establish the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Ph 1 also includes a randomized surgical substudy to characterize PK and pharmacodynamics (PD) of preoperative NUV-422 in resected GB tumor tissue. After the RP2D is identified, parallel enrollment into phase 2 expansion cohorts will begin. Cohort 1 will evaluate isocitrate dehydrogenase wild type (IDH-WT) GB. Cohort 2 will evaluate HR+ HER2- mBC (without active brain metastases); Cohort 3 will evaluate mCRPC; and Cohort 4 will evaluate HR+ HER2- mBC with active brain metastases. The Ph 2 primary endpoint is objective response rate. Secondary efficacy endpoints include clinical benefit rate, duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Response assessments will be based on response criteria appropriate to the tumor type (HGG [RANO]; HR+HER2- mBC [RECIST 1.1 or RANO-Brain Metastases]; mCRPC [RECIST 1.1, PCWG3, prostate-specific antigen decrease]). Blood, urine, or tumor tissue will be obtained to assess safety, PK, PD, and for additional exploratory analyses to characterize NUV-422 mechanism of action. Enrollment was initiated in December 2020, and dose escalation is ongoing. The NUV-422 program will also be expanded in 2022 to include additional studies in mBC and mCRPC in combination with standard of care treatments. Clinical trial information: NCT04541225.

EO2401, a novel microbiome-derived therapeutic vaccine for patients with recurrent glioblastoma: ROSALIE study

2034

Background: EO2401 (EO) was designed to activate existing commensal memory T-cells cross-reacting with tumor associated antigens (TAAs). EO includes microbial-derived, synthetically produced peptides corresponding to HLA-A2 restricted epitopes with molecular mimicry to three TAAs upregulated in glioblastoma (GB), IL13Rα2, BIRC5 and FOXM1, with the CD4 helper peptide UCP2 and the adjuvant Montanide. Pre-clinically EO generates strong immune responses and cross-reactive CD8 cells recognizing the TAAs. Methods: This ongoing Ph 1/2 trial (NCT04116658) investigates EO (SC q2 wks X 4 then q4 wks), EO with nivolumab (3 mg/kg q2 wks; EN), and EN with bevacizumab (10 mg/kg q2 wks; ENB) among four Cohorts (Cs) of pts with GB at first progression after radiotherapy/temozolomide. After the Ph 1 of EO followed by EN (C1), C2 investigated EN without (C2a) or with (C2b) surgery while C3 investigated ENB (population as C2a). Results: Among 40 treated pts (C1 n = 3, C2a n = 23, C2b n = 3, C3 n = 11), median age was 60, 53% male, 40% had KPS 90-100% and 35% had O6-methylguanine DNA-methyltransferase promotor hypermethylated tumors. All evaluable pts demonstrated strong CD8 T-cell ELISPOT responses against the 3 vaccine peptides, with tetramer staining of specific CD8 detected in 24/25 investigated pts after in vitro stimulation and in 19/20 pts directly ex vivo. Cross-reactivity against targeted TAAs was confirmed in 20/21 pts. Majority of response were detected by week 4 after 1st dose and as early as 2 weeks for some pts. EO, EN, and ENB were well tolerated (max exposure EN 68 wks, ENB 30 wks) with EO associated toxicity limited to local administration site reactions (48%; grade 1-2). The frequency and severity of nivolumab- or bevacizumab-associated AEs was consistent with historical monocompound experience. With a median follow-up of 9.3 months (range, 2.8-15.6), median progression-free survival (PFS), survival at 6 months (OS-6) and at 12 months for EN (C1+C2a+C2b) were 1.8 months (3 ongoing at 5.9, 7.1, and 14.7 months), 85%, and 50.1% (19/29 alive), respectively. With a median follow-up of 3.7 months (range, 2.2-7.2), pts on ENB (C3) have median PFS and OS-6 of 5.5 months (7 ongoing), and 80% (10/11 alive), respectively. ORR for EN and ENB were 10% and 36%, respectively (5 of 7 ongoing). In C2a, 12/23 pts stopped treatment due to neurological symptoms and PD on first MRI (median 5 wks, range 2-8). In C3 (ENB), only 1/11 pts stopped early due to PD. Conclusions: EO2401 generated strong systemic immune responses and was well tolerated in combination with nivolumab +/- bevacizumab. The addition of bevacizumab to EN improved PFS while survival across treatment cohorts is pending ongoing follow-up. To prolong EN exposure that is likely required for therapeutic activity in recurrent GB, the trial has been expanded with additional pts to evaluate low-dose bevacizumab (5 mg/kg q2 wks up to x 6) for early progressive neurological symptoms. Clinical trial information: NCT04116658.

Predictions of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for specific therapeutic interventions in newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) using Cellworks Singula: myCare-024-04

2053

Background: Comprehensive molecular profiling reveals significant differences in treatment response among GBM patients. A mechanistic multi-omics biology model allows biosimulation of molecular effects of cell signaling, drugs and radiation on patient-specific in silico diseased cells. The Cellworks Singula Therapy Response Index (TRI) identifies the magnitude of disease control and survival for specific anti-tumor strategies. TRI ranks the anticipated outcome of each therapy with a continuous TRI Score, 0 to 100, for each patient’s unique genomic network. Methods: TRI’s ability to predict OS and PFS was prospectively evaluated in a retrospective cohort of 270 IDH wildtype GBM patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) with known clinical outcomes treated with physician prescribed therapies (PPT). The median age was 57.5 years for 162 males and 108 females. There were 73 MGMT methylated with median OS deceased of 17.1 months and living of 9.5 months and median PFS of 6.5 months. There were 197 MGMT unmethylated with median OS deceased of 14.0 months and living of 13.6 months and median PFS of 6.0 months. Stratified random sampling was used to split the data into independent training (N = 153) and validation (N = 117) subjects. Multivariate Cox Proportional Hazard and Proportional Odds models were used to model OS and PFS as a function of the pre-defined Singula TRI and clinical thresholds. Cox Proportional Hazards (PH) regression and likelihood ratio (LR) tests were used on the independent validation subjects to assess the hypothesis that Singula is predictive of OS and PFS above and beyond standard clinical factors. Results: In the validation set, Singula TRI was significantly predictive of OS and PFS in univariate analyses and remained significantly predictive in multivariate analyses which included age, sex, MGMT methylation status and drug class. Singula TRI facilitates selection of optimal personalized therapies by providing patient-specific estimates of OS and PFS for 18 NCCN guideline GBM therapies. Conclusions: Cellworks Singula was strongly predictive of OS and PFS and provided predictive value beyond physician prescribed therapy, patient age, sex and MGMT methylation status. This information may be used to estimate increases in OS and PFS when comparing Singula TRI recommended therapies versus standard care. These positive results suggest the utility of biosimulation-informed therapy selection to improve survival of GBM and merits validation in prospective clinical studies. [Table: see text]

Digital monitoring and assessments in patients with glioblastoma

2045

Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive primary tumor with poor prognosis and survival. Patients (pts) experience debilitating symptoms that have a negative effect on quality of life (QoL). A multidisciplinary approach is necessary to facilitate the reduction of morbidity, preserve QoL, and maximize benefits of treatment. Selinexor (SEL) is a first-in class, oral, selective inhibitor of nuclear export that blocks exportin 1 approved for use in multiple myeloma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and has shown activity in GBM. Digital measurements in the KING study through wearable sensors and other devices capture actionable daily data at home for improved care, symptom management, and QoL, are reported here. Methods: XPORT-GBM-029 (NCT04421378) is an ongoing phase 1 dose finding study followed by an open-label randomized phase 2, 5-arm trial to evaluate SEL in combination with standard therapies for newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM (n = 350): radiation+SEL /radiation and temozolomide; radiation and temozolomide±SEL; lomustine±SEL; bevacizumab±SEL; tumor treating field±SEL. The study is conducted at 18 sites in the US and Canada. GBM progression is assessed by standard clinical and imaging as well as QoL measurements by novel digital tools. Four parameters to determine the impact on QoL (cognitive function, lateralization, fatigue, sleep) are measured remotely by smartwatch and smartphone to continuously measure activity and sleep, and to complete a cognitive battery at baseline and before each MRI. Results: To date, pts wearing the smartwatch had higher compliance during the day for activity and gait measures compared to night for sleep measures. Younger pts had better compliance. Over the course of SEL treatment, changes were observed in balance (characterized by double support % and walking asymmetry) and activity level (characterized by step count and walking distance). Of the pts who participated in the cognitive battery (CANTAB) tests, 2 pts had a minor change in cognition measures including psychomotor and processing speed, episodic and spatial working memory, and executive function after 2 SEL treatment cycles. Overall, the CANTAB measures are stable, which align with the mRANO (MRI) results. The correlation between the CANTAB cognition measures and MRI data will be evaluated once more clinical data become available. Ongoing analyses will apply machine learning and statistical tools to determine potential correlations between digital and clinical data, such as physical examinations, AEs, Karnofsky scores, mRANO, NANO, KPS, and PRO QoL questionnaires. Conclusions: This is the first demonstration of digital measurement feasibility in a longitudinal study of pts with GBM. Digital measurements for pts with GBM could provide information on the impact of SEL-based treatment and functional outcomes in clinical trials and increase communication between clinicians and pts, thereby improving QoL and care management. Clinical trial information: NCT04421378.

Feasibility and conduct of INSIGhT, a platform trial of patients with glioblastoma using Bayesian adaptive randomization

2012

Background: Individualized Screening Trial of Innovative Glioblastoma Therapy (INSIGhT) trial is a phase II platform trial using response adaptive randomization and deep genomic profiling to more efficiently test experimental agents in MGMT unmethylated glioblastoma and potentially accelerate identification of novel therapies for phase III testing. We report on the feasibility and conduct of this approach. Methods: Tumor genotyping was performed prior to treatment assignment on eligible participants with newly diagnosed MGMT-unmethylated glioblastoma to identify biomarker signatures. Initial randomization was 1:1:1:1 between control (temozolomide) and 3 experimental arms (abemaciclib, CC-115, and neratinib). Subsequent randomization was adapted based on Bayesian estimation of biomarker-naïve and biomarker-specific probabilities of treatment impact on progression-free survival (PFS). Ineffective or toxic arms were discontinued by protocol amendment. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Results: INSIGhT randomized 71 patients to the control arm, 73 patients to the abemaciclib arm, 12 patients to the CC-115 arm, and 81 patients to the neratinib arm between 2/9/2017 and 5/14/2021. Following the initial equal randomization period, early data were repeatedly analyzed during the study to capture early signals of treatment effects across the enrolled population or in specific biomarker subgroups. The results of these interim analyses influenced the randomization probability for future enrolled patients. In total, 77% of the participants were randomized before assessing their biomarker profile and 23% were biomarker randomized. The CC-115 arm opened and closed three times during the safety lead-in. The randomization probability to the CC-115 arm decreased based on poor early PFS results and the arm eventually closed after 12 patients due to toxicity. The randomization probability to the abemacicilb arm increased based on promising early PFS results. After the completion of accrual into the abemaciclib arm, the trial switched to block randomization to finish enrolling into the remaining neratinib and control arms. A total of 28 interim analyses and 32 randomization tables were created throughout the course of the trial with 4 adjustments (3 due to CC-115 closures and 1 due to completion of the abemaciclib arm). Biomarker association trends for neratinib and abemaciclib were similar to those seen in preclinical modeling of the trial. Conclusions: Relative to a standard randomization design, the adaptive platform design facilitated more efficient and economical testing of experimental arms by sharing a control arm, decreasing the probability of enrollment to potentially ineffective arms, and increasing the probability of enrollment to potentially effective arms. Additional future arms are planned on INSIGhT. Clinical trial information: NCT02977780.