Impact of global hemodynamic load on exercise capacity in aortic stenosis

BACKGROUND

The determinants of maximal exercise capacity (MEC) in aortic stenosis (AS) are, in large part, unknown. We hypothesized that the left ventricular (LV) global hemodynamic load--as assessed by the valvulo-arterial impedance (Zva)--is one of the main determinants of MEC and we sought to evaluate the factors associated with reduced MEC in AS.

METHOD AND RESULTS

Asymptomatic patients with moderate or severe AS (n=62, aortic valve area <1.5 cm(2), 65 ± 13 years, 68% men) and preserved LV systolic function (ejection fraction>50%) were prospectively referred for comprehensive resting echocardiography and cardiopulmonary exercise test. Absolute peak VO2 was 19.5 ± 5.7 mL/kg/min (median 19.6 mL/kg/min; range 7.2-33.1 mL/kg/min). There were significant correlations between peak VO2 and: age, body mass index, LV stroke volumes, cardiac output, mean flow rate, mitral annulus s' and e' wave velocities, E/e' ratio and left atrial diameter (all p<0.05). Indexed mean flow rate and Zva were the strongest univariable echocardiographic determinants of peak VO2 (r=0.44, p<0.001 and r=-0.39, p=0.002, respectively). In addition, patients with reduced MEC (peak VO2<median) had higher Zva than those with preserved MEC (4.24 ± 1.18 vs. 3.71 ± 0.68 mmHg/mL/m(2), p=0.036). In multivariable analysis, age (p<0.001) and Zva (p=0.048) were the only independent predictors (r(2)=0.40) of peak VO2.

CONCLUSION

In asymptomatic patients with moderate to severe AS, MEC varies widely among patients, and is often lower than expected. Global LV hemodynamic load is the main echocardiographic determinant of reduced MEC in these patients, suggesting its usefulness for their clinical evaluation and management.

A new index measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to detect mechanical heart valve malfunction

More than two thirds of valve replacement operations performed each year used mechanical heart valve. These valves are subject to complications such: pannus and/or thrombus formation. One other potential complication is a malfunction in one of the valve leaflets. It is then important to develop parameters that will allow a non-invasive diagnosis of such valve malfunction. In the present study, we evaluated under steady low flow (1-8 L/min) and pulsatile flow (3, 5 and 7 L/min) a bileafleat mechanical heart valve with normal function, 50% and 100% of one valve leaflet malfunction. Image analysis was performed using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate transvalvular pressure gradients (TPG), effective orifice area and a new index given by central/lateral velocity ratio downstream of the valve. Our results showed that the flow upstream and downstream of the defective valve is highly influenced by malfunction severity. TPG did not allow differentiating valve malfunction at low flow under steady and pulsatile conditions. However the new index given by central/lateral ratio allowed differentiating the presence of valve malfunction using a single transverse velocity measurement.