Outcomes and complications of radiation therapy in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis

BACKGROUND

The outcomes, complications, and rates of secondary malignancies from radiation therapy (RT) are not known for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP).

METHODS

We queried the Hereditary Gastrointestinal Cancer Registry (HGCR) for patients with FAP who received RT. Outcomes assessed included acute and late treatment toxicity and secondary malignancies.

RESULTS

We identified 15 patients undergoing 18 treatment courses. Median follow-up was 3.1 years after RT. Treated sites included rectal cancer, desmoid, prostate cancer, breast cancer, melanoma, medulloblastoma, gastric cancer, and glioma. Secondary tumors occurred in two patients: a medulloblastoma was diagnosed in a patient treated for glioma, and a desmoid tumor was diagnosed in a patient treated for rectal cancer. All nine patients treated with intra-abdominal or pelvic RT had prior prophylactic proctocolectomies, yet only one patient experienced grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4 (CTCAE v4) toxicities were grade 1 in seven treatment courses (39%), grade 2 in five courses (28%), and grade 3 in two courses (11%).

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort, RT was well tolerated with adverse effects comparable with non-FAP patients. Secondary in-field tumors occurred in 2 of 15 patients and their increased risk in this cohort was likely due to prior predilection from FAP itself, although an increased role of RT cannot be ruled out.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria for external beam radiation therapy treatment planning for clinically localized prostate cancer, part II of II

PURPOSE

To present the most updated American College of Radiology (ACR) Appropriateness Criteria formed by an expert panel on the appropriate delivery of external beam radiation to manage stage T1 and T2 prostate cancer (in the definitive setting and post-prostatectomy) and to provide clinical variants with expert recommendations based on accompanying Appropriateness Criteria for target volumes and treatment planning.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a panel of multidisciplinary experts. The guideline development and revision process includes an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In instances in which evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

RESULTS

The panel summarizes the most recent and relevant literature on the topic, including organ motion and localization methods, image guidance, and delivery techniques (eg, 3-dimensional conformal intensity modulation). The panel presents 7 clinical variants, including (1) a standard case and cases with (2) a distended rectum, (3) a large-volume prostate, (4) bilateral hip implants, (5) inflammatory bowel disease, (6) prior prostatectomy, and (7) a pannus extending into the radiation field. Each case outlines the appropriate techniques for simulation, treatment planning, image guidance, dose, and fractionation. Numerical rating and commentary is given for each treatment approach in each variant.

CONCLUSIONS

External beam radiation is a key component of the curative management of T1 and T2 prostate cancer. By combining the most recent medical literature, these Appropriateness Criteria can aid clinicians in determining the appropriate treatment delivery and personalized approaches for individual patients.

The Benefit of Adjuvant Radiation in Surgically-Treated T1-2 N1 Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Importance

The benefit of adjuvant radiation in surgically treated T1‐2N1 oropharyngeal cancer without adverse pathologic features remains unclear

Objectives

To compare population‐level survival outcomes in surgically‐treated T1‐2N1 oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) with and without the use of adjuvant radiation.

Study Design

Retrospective population‐based study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry data from 1998–2011.

Setting

Population‐level study.

Participants

Patients with T1‐2N1 OPSCC treated with surgical resection and neck dissection with or without adjuvant radiation.

Intervention(s) for Clinical Trials or Exposure(s) for observational studies

The use of postoperative adjuvant radiation.

Main Outcome(s) and Measures

Overall and disease‐specific survival.

Results

Radiation was utilized in 74% of patients and was positively associated with extracapsular extension and well‐differentiated histology. The use of radiation was associated with improved mean overall survival (124 v. 108 months, p=0.023) and a non‐significant increase in mean disease‐specific survival (138 v. 131 months, p=0.053).

Conclusions and Relevance

The use of adjuvant radiation is associated with improved survival in surgically‐treated T1‐2N1 squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx with unknown HPV status.

Level of Evidence

IV

Case-control study of candidate gene methylation and adenomatous polyp formation

PURPOSE

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common and preventable forms of cancer but remains the second leading cause of cancer-related death. Colorectal adenomas are precursor lesions that develop in 70-90 % of CRC cases. Identification of peripheral biomarkers for adenomas would help to enhance screening efforts. This exploratory study examined the methylation status of 20 candidate markers in peripheral blood leukocytes and their association with adenoma formation.

METHODS

Patients recruited from a local endoscopy clinic provided informed consent and completed an interview to ascertain demographic, lifestyle, and adenoma risk factors. Cases were individuals with a histopathologically confirmed adenoma, and controls included patients with a normal colonoscopy or those with histopathological findings not requiring heightened surveillance (normal biopsy, hyperplastic polyp). Methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction was used to characterize candidate gene promoter methylation. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using unconditional multivariable logistic regression to test the hypothesis that candidate gene methylation differed between cases and controls, after adjustment for confounders.

RESULTS

Complete data were available for 107 participants; 36 % had adenomas (men 40 %, women 31 %). Hypomethylation of the MINT1 locus (OR 5.3, 95% CI 1.0-28.2) and the PER1 (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.1-7.7) and PER3 (OR 11.6, 95% CI 1.6-78.5) clock gene promoters was more common among adenoma cases. While specificity was moderate to high for the three markers (71-97 %), sensitivity was relatively low (18-45 %).

CONCLUSION

Follow-up of these epigenetic markers is suggested to further evaluate their utility for adenoma screening or surveillance.

Factors predictive of receiving neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer and the impact on overall survival

686

Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) is generally accepted as the optimal treatment strategy compared to adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (ACRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer due to improvement in local control and reduced toxicity. However, NCRT has not been shown to improve overall survival (OS). We investigated the effect of NCRT versus ACRT on OS as well as the impact of demographic factors and clinical stage for the selection of each treatment approach utilizing the National Cancer Data Base. Methods: Adult patients with stage II and stage III adenocarcinoma of the rectum diagnosed from 2004-2013 were included. Chi-square analysis was used to compare demographic variables and clinical stage between the NCRT and ACRT treatment groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression modeling was used to identify factors predictive of each treatment strategy. Kaplan Meier and log-rank analysis along with propensity score matching was performed to determine the effect on OS. Results: A total of 20,262 patients were identified: 17,737 (87.5%) received NCRT and 2,525 (12.5%) received ACRT. Utilization of NCRT increased over the study period (p < 0.01). Factors associated with receipt of NCRT on multivariate analysis include: treatment at an academic institution (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.68-0.85), income greater than $46,000 (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.67-0.92), and living greater than 50 miles from a treatment facility. Factors associated with receipt of ACRT on multivariate analysis include: female sex (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.01-1.24), Charlson comorbidity index of 1 (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.04-1.34), and radiotherapy dose greater than 5040 centigray (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.56-1.98). Compared to ACRT, NCRT was associated with a decreased risk of death on multivariate analysis (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.84-1.00), which persisted after propensity score analysis. Conclusions: The use of NCRT for locally advanced rectal cancer is increasing and is associated with an OS benefit compared to ACRT.

ACR appropriateness criteria: Permanent source brachytherapy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To provide updated American College of Radiology (ACR) appropriateness criteria for transrectal ultrasound-guided transperineal interstitial permanent source brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The ACR appropriateness criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

RESULTS

Permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB) is a treatment option for appropriately selected patients with localized prostate cancer with low to very high risk disease. PPB monotherapy remains an appropriate and effective curative treatment for low-risk prostate cancer patients demonstrating excellent long-term cancer control and acceptable morbidity. PPB monotherapy can be considered for select intermediate-risk patients with multiparametric MRI useful in evaluation of such patients. High-risk patients treated with PPB should receive supplemental external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) along with androgen deprivation. Similarly, patients with involved pelvic lymph nodes may also be considered for such combined treatment but reported long-term outcomes are limited. Computed tomography-based postimplant dosimetry completed within 60 days of PPB is essential for quality assurance. PPB may be considered for treatment of local recurrence after EBRT but is associated with an increased risk of toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Updated appropriateness criteria for patient evaluation, selection, treatment, and postimplant dosimetry are given. These criteria are intended to be advisory only with the final responsibility for patient care residing with the treating clinicians.

Increasing use of nonsurgical therapy in advanced-stage oral cavity cancer: A population-based study

BACKGROUND

National guidelines support surgical-based treatment and offer nonsurgical therapy as an alternative for advanced-stage oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). There are limited data evaluating current utilization of these therapies and their survival outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 5856 patients were found in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 1988 to 2008 with resectable advanced-stage oral cavity SCC tumors. Outcomes were disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Surgical therapy had significantly improved mean DSS and OS (115 and 71 months, respectively) compared to nonsurgical therapy (63 and 35 months, respectively; p < .001). The use of nonsurgical therapy was significantly associated with the hard palate, and patients who were single, divorced, and black, with T3, T4, and N3 tumors, and the percent utilization has significantly increased from 12% to 20% (p < .05).

CONCLUSION

Utilization of nonsurgical therapy for advanced-stage oral cavity SCC is increasing and is independently associated with a reduction in survival, as well as patient factors traditionally associated with reduced access to medical care and advanced T and N classifications. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 39: 82-91, 2017.

Discovering Related Clinical Concepts Using Large Amounts of Clinical Notes

The ability to find highly related clinical concepts is essential for many applications such as for hypothesis generation, query expansion for medical literature search, search results filtering, ICD-10 code filtering and many other applications. While manually constructed medical terminologies such as SNOMED CT can surface certain related concepts, these terminologies are inadequate as they depend on expertise of several subject matter experts making the terminology curation process open to geographic and language bias. In addition, these terminologies also provide no quantifiable evidence on how related the concepts are. In this work, we explore an unsupervised graphical approach to mine related concepts by leveraging the volume within large amounts of clinical notes. Our evaluation shows that we are able to use a data driven approach to discovering highly related concepts for various search terms including medications, symptoms and diseases.

Comparison of external beam radiation and brachytherapy to external beam radiation alone for unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHC) is a rare malignancy with a relatively poor prognosis. There are no randomized, prospective data to help define the optimal method of radiation delivery for unresectable EHC. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the benefit of adding brachytherapy to external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for unresectable EHC.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 1,326 patients with unresectable EHC using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was completed. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to analyze the primary endpoint, overall survival. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to identify and control for potential confounding variables, including age at diagnosis, sex, stage, grade, histology, race, year of diagnosis, and reason for no surgery.

RESULTS

Of the 1,326 patients with unresectable EHC, 1,188 (92.9%) received EBRT only, while 91 (7.1%) received both EBRT and brachytherapy. Patients receiving combined modality radiation therapy were more likely to be treated prior to the year 2000. Median overall survival for patients receiving EBRT and EBRT plus brachytherapy was 9 and 11 months, respectively (P=0.04). Cause specific survival was 12 months for those receiving EBRT only, and 15 months for those who received EBRT + brachytherapy (P=0.10). Survival analysis performed on patients with locoregional disease only revealed a trend towards prolonged overall survival with those receiving EBRT + brachytherapy (P=0.08). Multivariate analysis revealed grade and stage of disease were correlated with both overall survival and cause specific survival (P≤0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with unresectable EHC, the addition of brachytherapy to EBRT is associated with a prolonged median overall survival. However, the use of brachytherapy boost decreased in the last decade of the study.

Design and methods of CYCLE-HD: improving cardiovascular health in patients with end stage renal disease using a structured programme of exercise: a randomised control trial

BACKGROUND

There is emerging evidence that exercise training could positively impact several of the cardiovascular risk factors associated with sudden cardiac death amongst patients on haemodialysis. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of an intradialytic exercise programme on left ventricular mass.

METHOD AND DESIGN

Prospective, randomised cluster open-label blinded endpoint clinical trial in 130 patients with end stage renal disease on haemodialysis. Patients will be randomised 1:1 to either 1) minimum of 30 min continuous cycling thrice weekly during dialysis or 2) standard care. The primary outcome is change in left ventricular mass at 6 months, assessed by cardiac MRI (CMR). In order to detect a difference in LV mass of 15 g between groups at 80 % power, a sample size of 65 patients per group is required. Secondary outcome measures include abnormalities of cardiac rhythm, left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction, physical function measures, anthropometric measures, quality of life and markers of inflammation, with interim assessment for some measures at 3 months.

DISCUSSION

This study will test the hypothesis that an intradialytic programme of exercise leads to a regression in left ventricular mass, an important non-traditional cardiovascular risk factor in end stage renal disease. For the first time this will be assessed using CMR. We will also evaluate the efficacy, feasibility and safety of an intradialytic exercise programme using a number of secondary end-points. We anticipate that a positive outcome will lead to both an increased patient uptake into established intradialytic programmes and the development of new programmes nationally and internationally.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN11299707 (registration date 5(th) March 2015).

The "decay" of brachytherapy use in tumors of the oral cavity: A population-based patterns of care and outcomes analysis from 1973 to 2012

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate if use of brachytherapy (BT) is associated with improved survival in patients with oral cavity cancer who do not receive surgery and to analyze patterns of care.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We queried the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for patients who received radiation therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity between 1973 and 2012. Patients were grouped by treatment modality: external beam radiotherapy alone vs. external beam radiotherapy + BT. Surgical patients were excluded. Trends in BT utilization over the study period and patterns of care were analyzed. Propensity scores were generated, and a nearest-neighbor matching algorithm was used to balance the 2 groups. Cox regression modeling was used to estimate the effect of BT on overall survival. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to estimate the effect of unmeasured confounders on the analysis.

RESULTS

Of 5,161 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity who received radiotherapy, 12% of patients received BT. The rate of BT use has decreased by 0.58% per year (p < 0.001). Factors that predicted for omission of radiation therapy included age ≥ 65 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.56; p < 0.001), regional nodal disease (aOR, 0.57; p < 0.001), and black race (aOR, 0.45; p < 0.001). Use of BT was associated with a decreased risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.75; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of BT is associated with improved survival in oral cavity tumors treated with definitive radiotherapy. Rates of BT utilization have declined by 0.58% per year and are currently very low.

Increased risk of death due to heart disease after radiotherapy for esophageal cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the risk of heart disease related death (HDRD) following radiation therapy (RT) for esophageal cancer (EC).

METHODS

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, two cohorts of patients with EC were created: (I) patients who received RT with their initial therapy; and (II) those who did not. Heart disease specific survival (HDSS) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Cox proportional-hazards regression methods were used for univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

We identified 40,778 patients with EC. A total of 26,377 patients received RT and 14,401 did not. HDSS analysis revealed increased risk of HDRD in those receiving RT (P<0.05), with an absolute risk of HDRD of 2.8%, 5.3% and 9.4% at 5-, 10- and 20-year, respectively. Log rank test of HDSS revealed the risk of HDRD became significant at 8 months (P<0.05). The following were associated with HDRD: RT, age, race, stage at presentation, time period of diagnosis, and known comorbid condition keeping one from esophagectomy. On multivariate analysis, RT remained predictive of HDRD [hazard ratio (HR) 1.46, P<0.05]. When considering only candidates for definitive therapy, RT remained predictive of HDRD on univariate (HR 1.53, P<0.0001) and multivariate (HR 1.62, P<0.0001) analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of RT leads to increased risk of HDRD that is detectable as early as eight months from diagnosis. More research is needed to define optimal dose volume parameters to prevent cardiac death. Consideration should be given to this risk in relation to prognosis and the expected benefits of RT.

Changes in brachytherapy-based APBI patient selection immediately before and after publication of the ASTRO consensus statement

PURPOSE

In July 2009, American Society of Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) released a consensus statement (CS) to guide patient selection for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). The goal of this study was to examine how practice patterns changed following the guideline's release.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was queried from 2008 to 2010 for females aged ≥20 years receiving breast conservation via brachytherapy. Among the APBI cohort, characteristics and CS grouping ("suitable," "cautionary," or "unsuitable") of patients receiving APBI in the 18 months before (January 2008 to June 2009) and after (July 2009 to December 2010) guideline publication were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 87,528 patients undergoing breast conservation therapy were identified. Of this, 4,253 patients (4.9%) received brachytherapy-based APBI. Limiting the analysis to patients not missing data that would affect their CS classification rendered 3,828 patients. The proportion of breast conservation patients receiving brachytherapy-based APBI before and after CS release remained the same (4.9% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.36). Among patients receiving brachytherapy-based APBI, the unsuitable category decreased (15.8 vs. 11.1%, p < 0.01), whereas the suitable category increased (37.7% vs. 42.1%, p = 0.03), and the cautionary category was stable (46.5% vs. 46.7% p = 0.90) after guideline publication. Joinpoint regression analysis failed to reveal that the changes in practice patterns corresponded with the CS publication date.

CONCLUSIONS

The period before and after publication of the ASTRO CS was associated with a decrease in "unsuitable" patients and an increase in "suitable" patients being treated with brachytherapy-based APBI. This trend began before guideline release and thus cannot be definitively attributed to the ASTRO CS.

ACR appropriateness Criteria® Postradical prostatectomy irradiation in prostate cancer

The purpose of this article is to present an updated set of American College of Radiology consensus guidelines formed from an expert panel on the appropriate use of radiation therapy in postprostatectomy prostate cancer. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment. Recent and relevant literature reviewed by the panel led to establishment of criteria for appropriate use of radiation therapy in postprostatectomy prostate cancer. The discussion includes treatment technique, appropriate dose, field design, and the role of prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Ratings and commentary of the panel on multiple treatment parameters were used to reach consensus. Patients with high-risk pathologic features benefit from postprostatectomy radiation therapy.