A phase I/IIA study of AGS-PSCA for castration-resistant prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

This first-in-human phase I/IIA study was designed to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics (PKs) of AGS-PSCA a fully human monoclonal antibody directed to prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA) in progressive castration-resistant prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-nine patients were administered infusions of AGS-PSCA (1-40 mg/kg) every 3 weeks for 12 weeks; 18 final patients received a 40-mg/kg loading dose followed by 20-mg/kg repeat doses. Primary end points were safety and PK. Immunogenicity, antitumor activity and circulating tumor cells were also evaluated.

RESULTS

No drug-related serious adverse events were noted. Dose escalation stopped before reaching the maximum tolerated dose as target concentrations were achieved. Drug levels accumulated linearly with dose and the mean terminal half-life was 2-3 weeks across dose levels. The 40-mg/kg loading dose followed by repeated 20-mg/kg doses yielded serum drug concentrations above the projected minimum therapeutic threshold after two to three doses without excessive drug accumulation or toxicity. Significant antitumor effects were not seen.

CONCLUSIONS

A 40-mg/kg loading dose followed by 20-mg/kg infusions every 3 weeks is the recommended phase II dose of AGS-PSCA. PSCA is a promising drug target and studies in prostate and other relevant solid tumors are planned.

A phase I study of the androgen signaling inhibitor ARN-509 in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)

4548

Background: ARN-509 is a novel small molecule AR antagonist that impairs AR nuclear translocation and binding to DNA, inhibiting tumor growth and promoting apoptosis, with no partial agonist activity. (Clegg et al., 2012) We conducted a phase I trial to assess safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Methods: Eligible patients with mCRPC received ARN-509 orally on a continuous daily dosing schedule. Seven doses (30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, and 300 mg) were tested using standard 3x3 dose escalation criteria. Once drug concentrations were achieved that met or exceeded optimal levels predicted preclinically, an additional 2 dose levels were tested to further confirm the safety margin of ARN-509 (390 and 480 mg). Anti-tumor activity was assessed by PSA, radiographic responses, and FDHT-PET imaging. Results: Thirty patients were enrolled. The most common grades 1-2 treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (38%), nausea (29%), and pain (24%). There was only 1 treatment-related grade 3 adverse event (abdominal pain) at 300 mg, possibly related to a higher pill burden. PK was shown to be linear and dose-dependent. At 12 weeks, 42% of patients have had ≥ 50% PSA declines. Eleven (37%) patients have discontinued the study due to progression, with the longest patient still on study for more than 16 months. FDHT-PET imaging demonstrated AR blockade at 4 weeks across multiple dose levels. Conclusions: In this phase I study, ARN-509 was shown to be safe and well tolerated with linear PK. Based on promising activity across all dose levels and pharmacodynamic evidence of AR antagonism, an optimal biologic dose of 240 mg daily was selected for phase II investigation. DOD/PCF PCCTC trial sponsored by Aragon Pharmaceuticals.

Targeting castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) with autologous PSMA-directed CAR+ T cells

TPS4700

Background: Based on our preclinical animal models, we initiated a phase I dose-escalating study to assess safety, dose requirement and targeting efficiency of genetically directed autologous human T cells targeted to Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA). Our approach is based on the infusion of autologous PSMA-targeted T cells utilizing the P28z second generation chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) in patients (pts) with metastatic CRPC, following iv cyclophosphamide (Cy) (trial NCT01140373). For safety, the herpes simplex virus-1 thymidine kinase (hsvtk) gene is co-expressed with the P28z receptor, and renders T cells sensitive to ganciclovir for immediate T cell elimination if needed. The expression of hsvtk enables PET imaging using radiolabeled FIAU to localize adoptively transferred T cells. The aims of the trial are to assess: (1) safety of PSMA-targeted T cells; (2) biologic and anti-tumor effects; (3) T cell persistence at tumor site; and (4) immune response. Methods: Autologous T cells are activated from a leukapheresis product using anti-CD3/CD28 Dynabeads. Release criteria include mean vector copy number by Q-PCR and vector identity by Southern blot, absence of Replication Competent Retrovirus and residual Dynabeads. Pts will be treated at 3 dose levels from 107 to 108 CAR+ T cells/kg. Four patients have been enrolled; 3 have been treated with 300mg/m2 of Cy one day before infusion of 107 CAR+ T cells/kg. Pts underwent baseline and post treatment CT, bone and PET scans. Pts are followed weekly, then monthly with blood work including immune and vector sequence monitoring. Results: The first 3 pts within the first cohort were successfully treated without toxicity. Two had stable disease for greater than 6 months with the third patient having disease progression. There were no acute adverse events. Conclusion: We have established an ex vivo transduction, expansion and therapeutic protocol for the generation and testing of safe, clinical-grade, PSMA targeted T cells. Pts enrolled at the next dose level of 3 x 107 CAR+ T cells/kg will be assessed as described and by imaging the transduced T cell population using 18F-FIAU as a radiotracer. The data pertaining to the planned T cell imaging will be presented as well.

A phase I trial of docetaxel and pulse-dose 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin in adult patients with solid tumors

PURPOSE

To define maximum tolerated dose (MTD), clinical toxicities, and pharmacokinetics of 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AAG) when administered in combination with docetaxel once every 21 days in patients with advanced solid tumor malignancies.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Docetaxel was administered over 1 h at doses of 55, 70, and 75 mg/m(2). 17-AAG was administered over 1-2 h, following the completion of the docetaxel infusion, at escalating doses ranging from 80 to 650 mg/m(2) in 12 patient cohorts. Serum was collected for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies during cycle 1. Docetaxel, 17-AAG, and 17-AG levels were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Biologic effects of 17-AAG were monitored in peripheral blood mononuclear cells by immunoblot.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients received docetaxel and 17-AAG. The most common all-cause grade 3 and 4 toxicities were leukopenia, lymphopenia, and neutropenia. An MTD was not defined; however, three dose-limiting toxicities were observed, including 2 incidences of neutropenic fever and 1 of junctional bradycardia. Dose escalation was halted at docetaxel 75 mg/m(2)-17-AAG 650 mg/m(2) due to delayed toxicities attributed to patient intolerance of the DMSO-based 17-AAG formulation. Of 46 evaluable patients, 1 patient with lung cancer experienced a partial response. Minor responses were observed in patients with lung, prostate, melanoma, and bladder cancers. A correlation between reduced docetaxel clearance and 17-AAG dose level was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of docetaxel and 17-AAG was well tolerated in adult patients with solid tumors, although patient intolerance to the DMSO formulation precluded further dose escalation. The recommended phase II dose is docetaxel 70 mg/m(2) and 17-AAG 500 mg/m(2).

Pilot study of veliparib (ABT-888) with temozolomide (TMZ) in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)

224

Background: Castration-resistant PC tumors exhibit increased PARP activity (critical enzymes for DNA damage repair). Veliparib is a novel, oral, potent inhibitor of PARP-1 and PARP-2. Preclinically, resistance to oral TMZ treatment in the PC3-Luc prostate cancer mouse model was reversed when mice were treated with veliparib. Based on the synergistic interaction, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of veliparib + TMZ in mCRPC pts.

Methods: Eligible pts had mCRPC, PSA>2 ng/mL, progressed on at least one docetaxel based therapy and adequate organ function. Pts received veliparib 40 mg BID Days (D) 1-7 and TMZ D1-5 in 28D cycle (C) until disease progression (PD) or unacceptable toxicities. Tumor response was assessed every 8 weeks. Primary objective: Efficacy based on rate of PSA decline of 30% or greater. Secondary objectives: safety, RECIST objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and biomarker analyses. A sample size of 25 pts provided 76% power to differentiate between PSA response rates of 5 and 20% at 1-sided type I error rate of 0.1.

Results: 26 pts were enrolled; median age 67 years [55, 81]; median baseline PSA 107 ng/ml (6.9, 4584.4); 7/26 (27%) had 2 prior therapies. Median Cs of veliparib + TMZ received were 2 (range 1–9). Most frequent treatment related adverse events (AE) were fatigue (50%), nausea (38%) and constipation (23%). Grade 3/4 AEs in >10% of pts was thrombocytopenia (15%). All pts are off therapy. 25 pts were PSA response evaluable; 2 pts had a confirmed PSA response; 1 pt had a 37% decrease in PSA while the other pt had a 96% decrease in PSA and a 40% reduction in tumor size. 4/25 pts had stable disease for a minimum of 4 months (m). Median PFS was 2.1 m [95% CI: 1.8, 3.9]; 11/26 pts have died with median OS of 9.1 m [95% CI: 5.5, 11.7]. There was a negative correlation between change from baseline in circulating tumor cells and PFS.

Conclusions: Veliparib + TMZ were well tolerated with evidence of some activity. Due to lack of activity of TMZ in CRPC,veliparib-induced potentiation of TMZ may not be clinically significant. Other combinations will be explored with higher doses of veliparib. Biomarker data will be presented.

Ipilimumab (IPI) in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Results from an open-label, multicenter phase I/II study

25

Background: IPI is a fully human, anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody capable of enhancing anti-tumor immunity. Preclinically, radiotherapy (XRT) and CTLA-4 blockade have synergistic anti-tumor activity. This phase 1/2 study in patients (pts) with mCRPC was designed to assess: safety of IPI at various doses, feasibility of combining IPI with XRT, and activity.

Methods: mCRPC pts with or without prior chemotherapy were enrolled. In the dose-escalation phase, 33 pts (³6 pts per cohort) received IPI q3 weeks x 4 doses at 3, 5, or 10 mg/kg, or with XRT at 3 or 10 mg/kg. Single dose XRT (8 Gy/lesion, up to 3 lesions per pt) was given 24 to 48 h before the first IPI dose. The 10 mg/kg ± XRT cohorts were expanded to 50; 34 received IPI + XRT (Table). Based on clinical benefit, pts received additional doses of IPI. Endpoints were safety, and activity as assessed by serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and RECIST criteria. PSA was monitored monthly, with scans q3 months (mos).

Results: There were no dose-limiting toxicities; 10 mg/kg ± XRT cohorts were, therefore, expanded for phase 2 evaluation. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) and immune-related AEs (irAEs) were common across all cohorts with or without XRT. Common (≥ 15%) treatment-related AEs of any grade in the 10 mg/kg ± XRT group were fatigue (50%), diarrhea (54%), nausea (24%), colitis (22%), decreased appetite (22%), vomiting (18%), rash (32%) and pruritus (20%). Most common grade 3/4 irAEs were colitis (16%), diarrhea (8%) and hepatitis (10%). irAEs were generally responsive to immunosuppressives. Of 50 PSA-evaluable pts in the 10 mg/kg ± XRT group, 8 had PSA response (Table) lasting between 3 and 13+ mos. Of the 28 tumor-evaluable pts receiving 10 mg/kg ± XRT, 1 had complete response and 6 had stable disease.

Conclusions: In pts with mCRPC, IPI 10 mg/kg alone or in combination with XRT showed clinical antitumor activity with disease control in some patients, and a generally manageable safety profile. The combination (IPI 10 mg/kg ± XRT) and monotherapy (IPI 10 mg/kg) are being explored in randomized phase 3 trials.

[Table: see text]

Phase I/II safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) study of ARN-509 in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Phase I results of a Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Consortium study

43

Background: In CRPC, androgen receptor (AR) overexpression is associated with resistance to first-generation anti-androgen therapy such as bicalutamide. ARN-509 is a novel small molecule AR antagonist that impairs AR nuclear translocation and binding to DNA, inhibiting tumor growth and promoting apoptosis, with no partial agonist activity. Preclinical data shows that ARN-509 binds AR with 5-fold greater affinity than bicalutamide, and induces tumor regression in hormone-sensitive and CRPC xenograft models.

Methods: In this open-label, Phase 1/2 study, mCRPC patients received ARN-509 orally on a continuous daily dosing schedule. In Phase 1 , 7 doses (30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 mg) were tested using standard 3x3 dose escalation criteria to assess safety, PK, and determine the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). Preliminary anti-tumor activity was assessed by PSA kinetics, radiographic responses, circulating tumor cells (CTCs), and FDHT-PET imaging.

Results: Twenty-four patients (median age 68 yrs, Gleason Score 8; prior docetaxel 13%) were enrolled. The most common Grade 1-2 treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (38%), nausea (29%), and pain (24%). There was only 1 treatment-related Grade 3 adverse event (abdominal pain) at 300 mg, possibly related to a higher pill burden, which led to an additional 3 patients being enrolled at the highest dose with no further dose limiting toxicities. PK was shown to be linear and dose-dependent. Twelve patients (55%) had ≥ 50% PSA declines. To date, 7 patients have discontinued the study due to progression, with the longest patient still on study for more than 1 year. FDHT-PET imaging demonstrated AR blockade at 4 weeks across multiple dose levels. Based on preclinical assessment of maximum efficacious dose, PK, and promising activity across all doses, 240 mg was selected as the RP2D.

Conclusions: In this Phase 1 study, ARN-509 was shown to be safe and well tolerated, with promising preliminary activity based on PSA and pharmacodynamic evidence of AR antagonism. The Phase 2 portion of the study will enroll up to 90 patients with treatment-naïve non-metastatic and mCRPC.

Phase I rapid dose-escalation study of AGS-1C4D4, a human anti-PSCA (prostate stem cell antigen) monoclonal antibody, in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer: a PCCTC trial

PURPOSE

AGS-1C4D4 is a human monoclonal antibody against prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA), a cell-surface protein expressed by most prostate cancers. AGS-1C4D4 is produced in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells and has an identical sequence to AGS-PSCA, an anti-PSCA antibody produced in mouse hybridoma cells that has completed Phase I testing. Preclinical studies demonstrated comparability of AGS-1C4D4 to AGS-PSCA with respect to pharmacokinetics (PK) and tumor inhibition. However, because of differences in antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity between AGS-PSCA and AGS-1C4D4, a limited Phase I trial using AGS-1C4D4 was performed evaluating safety and PK.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirteen patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer were enrolled. AGS-1C4D4 was administered intravenously every 3 weeks for four planned doses at 6, 12, 24, or 48 mg/kg. Primary endpoints were safety and PK. Secondary endpoints were immunogenicity and clinical activity. Disease assessments were conducted every 12 weeks and included radiographic and PSA evaluations. Patients with stable disease could receive extended treatment beyond four infusions.

RESULTS

Adverse events were primarily grade 1-2, without any grade 3-4 drug-related toxicities or infusion reactions. Anti-AGS-1C4D4 antibodies were not detected. Similar to AGS-PSCA, serum AGS-1C4D4 concentrations declined biphasically and elimination was characterized by slow clearance (CL) and a long terminal half-life (t (1/2)). Median CL for the four dose levels ranged from 0.10 to 0.14 ml/h kg, and t (1/2) ranged from 2.2 to 2.9 weeks. No PSA reductions ≥50% were observed. Six patients (46%) had radiographically stable disease, lasting a median of 24 weeks.

CONCLUSION

AGS-1C4D4 was well-tolerated and demonstrated linear PK. Despite preclinical differences in antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, AGS-1C4D4 and AGS-PSCA have similar safety and PK profiles. The recommended Phase II dose is 48 mg/kg.

Enhancing Immunogenicity of Cancer Vaccines: QS-21 as an Immune Adjuvant

Saponins comprise a class of plant natural products that incorporate a lipophilic terpenoid core, to which is appended one or more carbohydrate residues. They are amphiphilic molecules and often exhibit toxic biological profiles, likely as a result of their roles as vital components in protective coatings to defend against phytopathogen infection and insect predation. The most notable of adjuvant-active saponins investigated for vaccine development come from the Chilean Soapbark Tree, Quillaja saponaria (i.e., QS). More than 30 years ago, semi-purified extracts (i.e., Quil A) from the cortex of Quillaja saponaria were found to be highly effective as adjuvants in veterinary vaccines. However, due to significant and variable toxicity effects, Quil A was not deemed appropriate for human vaccines. More refined purification methods have led to multiple fractions which are derived from the original plant extract. As such, QS-21 to date appears to be one of the more scientifically interesting and robust adjuvants in use in vaccinology. The role of QS-21 as an adjuvant for use in a variety of cancer vaccine trials and its comparison to other adjuvants is discussed in this review.

Phase I dose-escalation study of the novel antiandrogen BMS-641988 in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer

PURPOSE

BMS-641988 is an androgen receptor antagonist with increased potency relative to bicalutamide in both in vitro and in vivo prostate cancer models. A first-in-man phase I study was conducted to define the safety and tolerability of oral BMS-641988 in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Doses were escalated from 5 to 150 mg based on discrete pharmacokinetic parameters in cohorts of three to six subjects. After establishing safety with 20 mg of BMS-641988 in the United States, a companion study was opened in Japan to assess differences in drug metabolism between populations.

RESULTS

Sixty-one men with CRPC were treated with daily BMS-641988. The pharmacokinetics (PK) of BMS-641988 and its active metabolites were proportional to dose. One patient experienced an epileptic seizure at a dose of 60 mg administered twice. Despite achieving target drug exposures, antitumor activity was limited to one partial response. Seventeen of 23 evaluable patients (74%) exhibited stable disease on imaging (median 15 weeks; range 8-32), and 10 of 61 patients (16%) achieved a ≥ 30% decline in levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Partial agonism was seen within the context of this study upon removal of the drug as evidenced by a decrease in PSA.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the clinical outcomes of predominantly stable disease and partial agonism were similar to what was observed in the preclinical evaluation of the compound, the limited antitumor activity of BMS-641988 at therapeutic dose levels coupled with an episode of seizure activity led to study closure.

A clinical trials outcome paradox: should survival prevail in the absence of clinical benefit?

A comparison was made using an established prognostic nomogram to determine the impact of survival on patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer using a pox-based vaccine. Survival in the treated cohort of 32 patients had improved compared with what was anticipated for the same group using an established nomogram. With a median follow-up of 44.6 months, the median overall survival for all 32 patients in the study was 26.6 months compared with a median nomogram-predicted survival of 17.4 months. The data suggested that there may be measures by which patients may be preselected and therefore may be more responsive candidates to a vaccine treatment approach. This study brings to light improved survival for patients, but the issue of how to reconcile a survival advantage in the absence of significant clinical anti-tumor response remains unsettled.

Seeking informed consent to Phase I cancer clinical trials: identifying oncologists' communication strategies

PURPOSE

Phase I clinical trials are the gateway to effective new cancer treatments. Many physicians have difficulty when discussing Phase I clinical trials. Research demonstrates evidence of suboptimal communication. Little is known about communication strategies used by oncologists when recruiting patients for Phase I trials. We analyzed audio recorded Phase I consultations to identify oncologists' communication strategies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Subjects were consecutive cancer patients from six medical oncologists attending one of three outpatient clinics at a major Cancer Center in the United States. Sixteen patients signed informed consent for audio recording of their consultations in which a Phase I study was discussed. These were transcribed in full and analyzed to identify communication strategies.

RESULTS

Six communication themes emerged from the analysis: (1) orienting, (2) educating patients, (3) describing uncertainty and prognosis, (4) persuading, (5) decision making, and (6) making a treatment recommendation. As expected, although there was some common ground between communication in Phase I and the Phase II and III settings, there were distinct differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Oncologists used persuasive communication, made explicit recommendations, or implicitly expressed a treatment preference and were choice limiting. This highlights the complexity of discussing Phase I trials and the need to develop strategies to aid oncologists and patients in these difficult conversations. Patient centered communication that values patient preferences while preserving the oncologist's agenda can be a helpful approach to these discussions.

Phase 1 trial of high-dose exogenous testosterone in patients with castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Growth of selected castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) cell lines and animal models can be repressed by reexposure to androgens. Low doses of androgens, however, can stimulate tumor growth.

OBJECTIVE

We performed a phase 1 clinical trial to determine the safety of high-dose exogenous testosterone in patients with castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer (CRMPC).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Patients with progressive CRMPC who had been castrate for at least 1 yr received three times the standard replacement dose of transdermal testosterone.

INTERVENTION

Cohorts of 3-6 patients received testosterone for 1 wk, 1 mo, or until disease progression.

MEASUREMENTS

Toxicities, androgen levels, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assays, computed tomography (CT) scans, bone scintigraphy, positron emission tomography (PET) scans, and metastatic tumor biopsy androgen receptor levels were assessed.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Twelve patients were treated-three in cohorts 1 and 2 and six in cohort 3. No pain flares were noted. One patient came off study because of epidural disease, which was treated with radiation. Average testosterone levels were within normal limits, although dihydrotestosterone (DHT) levels on average were supraphysiologic in cohort 3. One patient achieved a PSA decline of >50% from baseline. No objective responses were seen. For cohort 3, median time on treatment was 84 d (range: 23-247 d).

CONCLUSIONS

We have demonstrated that patients with CRMPC can be safely treated in clinical trials using high-dose exogenous testosterone. Patients did not, on average, achieve sustained supraphysiologic serum testosterone levels. Future studies should employ strategies to maximize testosterone serum levels, use contemporary methods of identifying patients with androgen receptor overexpression, and utilize PSA Working Group II Consensus Criteria clinical trial end points.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT00006044.

Department of Defense prostate cancer clinical trials consortium: a new instrument for prostate cancer clinical research

BACKGROUND

In 2005, the US Department of Defense, through the US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, Office of the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs, created a funding mechanism to form a clinical trials consortium to conduct phase I and II studies in prostate cancer. This is the first report of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Consortium (PCCTC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The Department of Defense award supports a consortium of 10 prostate cancer research centers. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center was awarded the Coordinating Center grant for the consortium and charged with creating an infrastructure to conduct early-phase multicenter clinical trials. Each participating center was required to introduce >or=1 clinical trial per year and maintain accrual of a minimum of 35 patients per year.

RESULTS

The PCCTC was launched in 2006 and now encompasses 10 leading prostate cancer research centers. Fifty-one trials have been opened, and 1386 patients have been accrued at member sites. Members share an online clinical trial management system for protocol tracking, electronic data capture, and data storage. A legal framework has been instituted, and standard operating procedures, an administrative structure, editorial support, centralized budgeting, and mechanisms for scientific review are established.

CONCLUSION

The PCCTC fulfills a congressional directive to create a clinical trials instrument dedicated to early-phase prostate cancer studies. The member institutions have built an administrative, informatics, legal, financial, statistical, and scientific infrastructure to support this endeavor. Clinical trials are open and accruing in excess of federally mandated goals.

Serum-soluble B7x is elevated in renal cell carcinoma patients and is associated with advanced stage

B7x is the newest member of the B7-CD28 family and is thought to dampen immune responses via negative costimulation. Tumor expression of B7x was recently described in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and was associated with poor outcome. We developed an assay to detect serum-soluble B7x (sB7x) and investigated 101 patients with clear cell RCC who underwent nephrectomy between 2003 and 2007. For controls, we obtained serum from 101 sex-matched blood donors within the same age range. Following an ELISA for sB7x, detectable levels (>0.1 ng/mL) of sB7x were observed in 53 RCC patients compared with 18 controls (P < 0.001). Median (range) concentrations of sB7x for RCC patients and controls were 14.4 ng/mL (0.1-56.9) and 2.7 ng/mL (0.2-37.1), respectively. For RCC patients with detectable sB7x, median levels were significantly higher for patients with a tumor thrombus (19.2 versus 6.6 ng/mL; P = 0.007), positive lymph nodes (41.3 versus 10.3 ng/mL; P = 0.018), and distant metastases at nephrectomy (43.3 versus 8.5 ng/mL; P = 0.002) and tended to be higher in patients with high-grade tumors (18.8 versus 8.5; P = 0.090). Additionally, median sB7x levels for tumor-node-metastasis stage I to IV RCC were 6.6, 10.3, 14.5, and 43.3 ng/mL, respectively (P = 0.012). In this first evaluation of sB7x in RCC, we show that RCC patients are more likely to have detectable sB7x compared with controls and higher sB7x levels correlate with advanced tumor stage. These early results merit further investigation of this serum marker for potential diagnostic and prognostic purposes.

Tribulations or triumphs in prostate cancer immunotherapy: on the road to victory?

Phase I, II and III clinical trials have shown that immunologic tolerance can be abrogated against specific tumor-associated antigens: but that the immunologic readouts are suboptimal in determining whether a trial can or should go forward in its development. While vaccines have been associated with declines in prostate-specific antigen, with occasional changes in scans by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, nevertheless, prostate vaccines alone appear to be insufficient to generate significant antitumor effects. Therefore, vaccines given in combination with cytokines or inhibitors of checkpoint molecules may not only enhance efficacy, but also validate the role of immune cells to effect the antitumor response. However, no one approach has been able to show improved overall survival. This article reviews the current issues and potential resolutions as to how we might go forward in developing and interpreting immunologic trials.

Phase II trial of docetaxel with rapid androgen cycling for progressive noncastrate prostate cancer

PURPOSE

We evaluated rapid androgen cycling in combination with docetaxel for men with progressive noncastrate prostate cancers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Noncastrate patients with 150 ng/dL) and an undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA;

RESULTS

A higher proportion of patients achieved the undetectable PSA outcome at 18 months in cohort 2 relative to cohort 1 (13% v 0%). The 16% incidence of febrile neutropenia was higher than that observed in patients was castration-resistant disease, which may have been related to a 50% reduction in overall docetaxel clearance in the noncastrate group. There was no alteration in CYP3A4 activity (P = .87) or docetaxel clearance (P = .88) between cycles.

CONCLUSION

The undetectable PSA end point allows for a rapid screening of interventions for further study. Increasing the number of docetaxel cycles after a shorter period of testosterone repletion, and a longer duration of testosterone depletion, increased the proportion of men who achieved an undetectable PSA. The higher-than-expected incidence of febrile neutropenia may have been related to the reduced overall docetaxel clearance in patients with noncastrate versus castrate testosterone levels.

Collapse

Key Words Collapse

MESH Headings

• Adult
• Aged
• Aged, 80 and over
• Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage
• Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A
• Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System/metabolism
• Docetaxel
• Humans
• Leuprolide/administration & dosage
• Male
• Middle Aged
• Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood
• Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy
• Prostatic Neoplasms/metabolism
• Taxoids/administration & dosage
• Taxoids/pharmacokinetics
• Testosterone/administration & dosage
• Testosterone/metabolism

Collapse

Grants

• P30 CA006973-48 NCI NIH HHS
• P30 CA006973 NCI NIH HHS
• P50-CA92629 NCI NIH HHS
• P50 CA092629 NCI NIH HHS
• PC051382 NCI NIH HHS

Collapse

Phase I Trial of the Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen–Directed Immunoconjugate MLN2704 in Patients With Progressive Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Purpose

MLN2704 is an immunoconjugate designed to deliver the maytansinoid antimicrotubule agent drug maytansinoid-1 directly to prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)–expressing cells via the PSMA-targeted monoclonal antibody MLN591. This novel immunoconjugate has shown cytotoxic anti–prostate cancer activity. This study investigated the safety profile, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and preliminary antitumor activity of MLN2704.

Patients and Methods

Patients with progressive, metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer received MLN2704 intravenously over 2.5 hours. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and antitumor activity were assessed.

Results

Twenty-three patients received MLN2704 at doses of 18 to 343 mg/m2. Eighteen of these patients received ≥ three doses at 4-week intervals. Pharmacokinetics of conjugate levels were dose proportional. There was no correlation between clearance and body-surface area. MLN2704 was nonimmunogenic. Study drug–related grade 3 toxicities occurred in three (13%) of 23 patients, including uncomplicated febrile neutropenia (the only DLT) in one patient, reversible elevations in hepatic transaminases, leukopenia, and lymphopenia. No grade 4 toxicities were observed. The most frequent grade 1 or 2 toxicities included fatigue, nausea, and diarrhea. Neuropathy occurred in eight (35%) of 23 patients, including five of six patients treated at 343 mg/m2. Two (22%) of the nine patients treated at 264 or 343 mg/m2 had sustained a more than 50% decrease in prostate-specific antigen versus baseline, accompanied by measurable tumor regression in the patient treated at 264 mg/m2.

Conclusion

Therapeutic doses of MLN2704 can be administered safely on a repetitive basis. An MTD was not defined. MLN2704 is being administered at more frequent intervals in ongoing trials to determine an optimal dosing schedule.

Prostate cancer vaccines: maximizing a suboptimal immune response for improved outcome

As approaches toward isolating tumor-associated antigens have become more refined, vaccines composed of novel cell surface proteins, peptides, or DNA encoding the molecule of interest have been developed. All of these approaches have in some way been shown to break immunologic tolerance, either by the generation of high-titer antibodies against the immunogen or by eliciting T-cell responses as shown by T-cell proliferation assays or specific cytokine release via enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot. No single immunologic approach to date has successfully shown significant durable disease remission in prostate cancer, albeit clinical trials using immune modulators together with vaccines have suggested that radiographic antitumor responses are feasible. This review updates the status of prostate cancer vaccines as tools for induction of active immunity and discusses the issues relevant to their clinical trial development.