Occult fetomaternal hemorrhage in women with pathological placenta with respect to permeability

AIM

Women with pre-eclampsia (PE), placenta previa (PP), placental abruption (PA), and placental mesenchymal dysplasia (PMD) have been described as having placental permeability dysfunction. This study was performed to determine whether occult fetomaternal hemorrhage (FMH) is common in women with such complications and in women with non-reassuring fetal status.

METHODS

Forty-one antenatal and 39 postnatal blood samples were obtained from 46 women, including 11 with placental permeability dysfunction (5, 3, 2, and 1 with PE, PP, PA, and PMD, respectively) and 35 controls without such complications. To estimate the amount of fetal red blood cells, flow cytometry was performed using the fetal cell count system with two antibodies against fetal hemoglobin and carbonic anhydrase and the β-γ system with two monoclonal antibodies against hemoglobin β-chain and hemoglobin γ-chain. A diagnosis of FMH was made when the fraction size of the isolated cell population on scatter plots expressing fetal hemoglobin alone or hemoglobin γ-chain alone accounted for ≥0.02% of the total cell population on scatter plots.

RESULTS

FMH was identified in five women, including one each with PE, PA, PP, PMD, and no complications. Thus, the prevalence rate of FMH was significantly higher in women with complications than in controls (36% [4/11] vs 2.9% [1/35], respectively, P =  0.009). The FMH occurrence rate did not differ between women with and without non-reassuring fetal status (7.7% [1/13] vs 12% [4/33], respectively, P =  1.000).

CONCLUSION

The risk of fetal red blood cells trafficking into the maternal circulation may be increased in women complicated with PE, PA, PP, and PMD.

Distinct X chromosomal rearrangements in four haemophilia B patients with entire F9 deletion

INTRODUCTION

Haemophilia B is an X-linked bleeding disorder caused by a coagulation factor IX gene (F9) abnormality. Numerous F9 defects have been identified to date; however, only a few with an entire F9 deletion have been reported in detail.

AIM

To elucidate the cause of severe haemophilia B, we investigated the precise X chromosome abnormalities in four Japanese patients who did not show all amplifications in F9-specific PCR.

METHODS

We analysed the patient's genomic DNA using Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). To assess the extent of any deletions, we further performed mapping PCRs, inverse PCRs or long-range PCRs and direct sequencing analyses of the X chromosome.

RESULTS

We detected entire F9 deletions in four haemophilia B patients and identified the precise deleted regions of the X chromosome including F9. Patient 1 had a 149-kb deletion with breakpoints 90-kb upstream and 30-kb downstream from F9. Patients 2 and 3 showed 273-kb and 1.19-Mb deletions respectively. Patient 4 had two deleted regions: a 1663-bp deletion 1.34-Mb upstream from F9 and a 7.2-Mb deletion including F9. These distinct breakpoints found in four different patients suggest that the mechanism of X chromosome deletion may be different between individuals. Non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR), microhomology-mediated break-induced replication (MMBIR) or fork stalling and template switching (FoSTeS) may occur in respective X chromosomes of the four haemophilia B patients analysed.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified diverse X chromosomal rearrangements in four haemophilia B patients, which might be caused by distinct mechanisms of genomic rearrangement.

Low-dose CT screening using hybrid iterative reconstruction: confidence ratings of diagnoses of simulated lesions other than lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the confidence ratings of diagnoses of simulated lesions other than lung cancer on low-dose screening CT with hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR).

METHODS

Simulated lesions (emphysema, mediastinal masses and interstitial pneumonia) in a chest phantom were scanned by a 320-row area detector CT. The scans were performed by 64-row and 160-row helical scans at various dose levels and were reconstructed by filtered back projection (FBP) and IR. Emphysema, honeycombing and reticular opacity were visually scored on a four-point scale by six thoracic radiologists. The ground-glass opacity as a percentage of total lung volume (%GGO), CT value and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of mediastinal masses were calculated. These scores and values were compared between FBP and IR. Wilcoxon's signed-rank test was used (p < 0.05). Interobserver agreements were evaluated by κ statistics.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in visual assessment. Interobserver agreement was almost perfect. CT values were almost equivalent between FBP and IR, whereas CNR with IR was significantly higher than that with FBP. %GGO significantly increased at low-dose levels with FBP; however, IR suppressed the elevation.

CONCLUSION

The confidence ratings of diagnoses of simulated lesions other than lung cancer on low-dose CT screening were not degraded with hybrid IR compared with FBP.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Hybrid IR did not degrade the confidence ratings of diagnoses on visual assessment and differential diagnoses based on CT value of mediastinal masses, and it showed the advantage of higher GGO conspicuity at low-dose level. Radiologists can analyse images of hybrid IR alone on low-dose CT screening for lung cancer.