Changes in cancer incidence and mortality in England and Wales and a comparison of cancer deaths in the major developed countries by age and sex 1979-2002 in context of GDP expenditure on health

Background:

The successful treatment of cancer is a major health and political issue for England and Wales and the major developed countries (MDCs). All malignancy deaths by age and sex are analysed to determine how successful the MDCs were in reducing cancer mortality between the end points of 1979–81 and 2000–2, and whether there was any association between each nations ‘gross domestic product expenditure on health’ (GDPEH) and the reduction in their cancer deaths.

Method:

Incidence of cancer in England and Wales was examined for 1979–80 to 2003–4 to highlight the extent of the problem. The cancer mortality rates for England and Wales were compared with each MDC by age and sex, using ‘WHO all malignancies mortality rates’ for the periods of 1979–81 and 2000–2, and tests of significance were made. The GDPEH for each MDC was examined for 1980–2002, and Spearman rank-order correlations calculated to explore any association between declining cancer deaths and the GDPEH of each MDC.

Results:

Conclusions:

The rising incidence in cancer-related deaths poses a problem for every MDC, and the poorer women’s results should be a matter of concern for most MDCs. The reduction in cancer deaths reflects well on frontline services, and the significant association between reduced cancer mortality and increased GDPEH is encouraging, but still a challenge for governments, especially if the incidence continues to rise.

Colorectal tubulovillous adenomas identified on fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography scans

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the significance of incidental focal colonic lesions on fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) scans in patients undergoing staging for noncolorectal cancer.

METHOD

Of the 110 patients in our PET/CT database, 10 were found to have abnormally high uptake of tracer in their large bowel.

RESULTS

Seven patients who underwent further endoscopic evaluation of these abnormalities had intermediate to high-risk adenomatous polyps.

CONCLUSION

Benign colonic polyps produce high-intensity focal FDG uptake in large bowel. Endoscopic evaluation is recommended before curative resectional surgery of the presenting cancer where appropriate.

Does histology influence outcome in advanced oesophagogastric (OG) cancer? Individual patient data from 1,680 patients on three randomised controlled trials (RCT)

15001

Background: In advanced OG cancer, it is unclear whether squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) differs from adenocarcinoma (Ad) in its response to chemotherapy, as most phase III studies do not include both histology. The aim of this pooled analysis was to evaluate whether there is a differential chemotherapy effect on overall survival (OS), response rate (RR) and toxicity depending on tumour histology (SCC vs. Ad) using individual patient (pt) data. Methods: From 1994 to 2005, 3 RCTs were conducted assessing fluoropyrimidine ± platinum-based chemotherapy. This analysis was restricted to eligible pts with SCC or Ad histology who received =1 dose chemotherapy. Apart from OS and RR, a toxicity composite endpoint (TCE) was constructed - defined as occurrence of grades =3 diarrhoea, (febrile) neutropenia, infection, nausea & vomiting, grades =2 renal and neurotoxicity. Ad was used as the control group. Two-sided p values of <0.05 were considered significant. Results: Of the 1,836 pts randomised, 1,680 were included for this analysis of whom 1,536 (91%) had Ad and 144 (9%) had SCC. Locally advanced disease was present in 17% and 20% of Ad and SCC patients respectively. The median survival was 9.4 months with Ad and 7.7 months with SCC and one year survival rates were 38% and 29% respectively (log rank p= 0.115) and this remained non- significant on multivariate analysis (p=0.206). The RR was 40.4% (95% CI: 38–42.9%) in Ad and 33.3% in SCC (95% CI: 26.1–41.4%; p=0.109). TCE occurred in 45% and 44% of patients with Ad and SCC respectively (p=1.0). Time to TCE was not significantly different (log rank p=0.829). Conclusions: Although there was a trend towards worse survival with SCC, no significant differences in chemotherapy outcome were demonstrated, despite our large dataset. Molecular therapeutics targeting distinct biological pathways between the two histology subtypes may influence outcome more than cytotoxic combinations in the future.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Oxaliplatin/5FU/LV in adjuvant colon cancer: Updated efficacy results of the MOSAIC trial, including survival, with a median follow-up of six years

4007

Background: The MOSAIC study was designed to evaluate the effects of the FOLFOX4 regimen (5-FU/LV + oxaliplatin) on 3- year disease free survival (DFS) probability in patients with stage II and III colon cancer. Methods: Patients (n=2246) with completely resected stage II (40%) or III (60%) colon cancer were randomly assigned to receive 5-FU/LV (LV5FU2) or FOLFOX4 every 2 weeks for 12 cycles. Results: Results for the primary endpoint of the study (for the overall population, with a median follow-up [FU] of 3 years), showed a significant benefit in DFS for the FOLFOX4-treated patients (78.2% vs 72.9%; HR: 0.77, p=0.002) (André et al, NEJM, 2004). Patients were followed beyond the 3-year cut-off for DFS and overall survival (OS) updates. Final DFS, at 5 years FU, are consistent with earlier results (HR: 0.80, p = 0.003). In addition, at a median FU of 6 years, the study demonstrates a significant benefit in OS for the stage III patients. Summary of OS results (median FU 6 years) Long-term safety update shows no increase in the rate of secondary cancer (5.0% in both treatment arms). Conclusions: These results confirm the benefit of the FOLFOX4 regimen in adjuvant colon cancer patients.

[Table: see text]

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Gefitinib and irinotecan in patients with fluoropyrimidine-refractory, irinotecan-naive advanced colorectal cancer: a phase I-II study

BACKGROUND

To establish the recommended dose level (RDL) and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gefitinib plus irinotecan in patients with advanced fluoropyrimidine-refractory colorectal cancer (CRC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced CRC progressing on or within 12 weeks of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy, irinotecan naive and performance status of two or less were recruited. During dose-finding phase, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was encountered at dose level 1, therefore subsequent dose de-escalation and pharmacokinetic (PK) studies were carried out. The RDL was then expanded in a multicentre setting to further evaluate safety and efficacy.

RESULTS

From June 2002 to February 2005, 39 patients were treated in total with 27 at the RDL. The RDL was established at irinotecan 225 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks and gefitinib 250 mg daily. The DLTs were neutropenia and diarrhoea. For the patients treated at RDL, the objective tumour response rate was 11.1% (95% confidence interval 2.4% to 29.2%) and median survival was 9.3 months. PK studies indicated that the addition of irinotecan to gefitinib resulted in an average of 50% increase in exposure to gefitinib (P < 0.05), but gefitinib did not alter the PK profiles of irinotecan or SN-38. Grade 3-4 toxic effects in all patients included diarrhoea (35.9%), lethargy (15.4%), neutropenia (15.4%), febrile neutropenia (10.3%) and skin rash (7.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Irinotecan and gefitinib at this dose schedule was tolerable, but gefitinib did not appear to add substantial efficacy to irinotecan.

Gastrazole (JB95008), a novel CCK2/gastrin receptor antagonist, in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer: results from two randomised controlled trials

Gastrin has been shown to be a growth stimulant in pancreatic cancer cells. Gastrazole is a potent and selective gastrin receptor antagonist. Two randomised blinded trials were conducted to assess the effect of gastrazole in advanced pancreatic cancer. Patients with biopsy-proven, inoperable pancreatic carcinoma were recruited. Trial A compared protracted venous infusion (PVI) gastrazole with PVI placebo, whereas trial B compared PVI gastrazole with PVI fluorouracil (5-FU). Eighteen patients were randomised in trial A. Gastrazole produced significantly better survival compared to placebo (median 7.9 months vs 4.5 months; 1-year survival: 33 vs 11%, respectively; log rank P=0.02). No difference in toxicity was seen between gastrazole and placebo, except central venous catheter and pump complications. Ninety-eight patients were randomised in trial B. No significant survival difference was detected between gastrazole and 5-FU (median: 3.6 vs 4.2 months; 1-year survival: 13.2 vs 26.2%, respectively; log rank P=0.42). Toxicity of gastrazole was mild with significantly less diarrhoea (P=0.03), stomatitis (P<0.001) and hand– foot syndrome (P<0.001) compared to 5-FU. Quality of life (QoL) assessment showed similar QoL between gastrazole and 5-FU at baseline and no significant differences occurred with treatment either between arms or within arms. Compared to placebo, patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with gastrazole appeared to live longer, albeit in a very small trial and will require confirmation with large-scale randomised data. However, it did not produce survival advantage over PVI 5-FU. Lack of toxicity for gastrazole may allow its combination with cytotoxic drugs.

Randomized double blind (DB) placebo (Plcb) controlled phase III study assessing the efficacy of xaliproden (X) in reducing the cumulative peripheral sensory neuropathy (PSN) induced by the oxaliplatin (Ox) and 5-FU/LV combination (FOLFOX4) in first-line treatment of patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC)

3507

Background: X, an orally administered non-peptide neurotrophic agent developed by sanofi-aventis, was shown in vitro to minimize neuritic damage induced by Ox (co-culture of Schwann cells and dorsal roots ganglia explant). The probability of occurrence of Grade (Gr) 3–4 PSN at a cumulative dose of Ox of 1000 mg/m2, was consistently reported to be of 18–20%. Methods: First line MCRC pts were randomized to receive, in a DB fashion, FOLFOX4 and either Plcb or X 1mg daily. X was administered from the 1st day of chemotherapy till 15 days post last Ox cycle. Co-primary objectives were reduction in the risk of occurrence of Gr 3–4 PSN relative to cumulative dose of Ox (Kaplan-Meier method) and non-inferiority in response rate (RR). Secondary endpoints included evaluation of sensory action potential (SAP) and safety. Results: From July 2002 to May 2004, 649 pts were randomized (324 Plcb, 325 X). Pts characteristics were well balanced across arms, median number of Ox cycles was 12 in both arms, median relative dose intensity (%) was 83.8 (Plcb) and 85.2 (X). A significant risk reduction of 39% in the probability of Grade 3–4 PSN in favor of X was reported (hazard ratio [95% CI] = 0.61 [0.40; 0.93], p= 0.0203). Overall RR [95 % CI] was: Plcb 42.6% [37.1; 48.2] and X 44.9% [39.4; 50.6]. As prospectively defined in the protocol, the lower bound of the CI of the RR ratio above 0.8 confirms noninferiority in RR (1.055 [0.88; 1.26]). In both arms the mean % of change in SAP worsens as a function of PSN severity. 17.3 (Plcb) and 13.5% (X) of the pts discontinued Ox because of PSN. Severe toxicities (% Gr 3–4), reported with a ≥2% difference between arms, were (plcb vs X): diarrhea 10.9 vs 13.0, pulmonary embolism 0.9 vs 3.1, fatigue 3.7 vs 1.5, neutropenia 43.0 vs 37.8. Conclusion: X was shown to be efficient in reducing the risk of Grade 3–4 oxaliplatin-induced PSN without impacting FOLFOX4 antitumor activity.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Gefitinib and irinotecan in patients with fluoropyrimidine-refractory irinotecan-naïve advanced colorectal cancer (CRC): dose-finding, pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy

13520

Background: Gefitinib (IRESSA) is an oral epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has shown supra-additive activity in human CRC xenografts when combined with irinotecan. We have previously established that the recommended dose level (RDL) to be irinotecan 225mg/m2 q3 weeks and gefitinib 250mg daily (Chau et al ASCO 2004). The dose limiting toxicities were neutropenia and diarrhoea. The continuation phase of this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this combination. Patients and Methods: Between Jun 2002 and Feb 2005, patients (pts) with advanced CRC progressing on or within 12 weeks of fluoropyrimidines-based chemotherapy, irinotecan-naïve and performance status ≤2 were recruited. Thirty-nine pts were treated with irinotecan and gefitinib in total with 27 treated at the RDL. Results: Median age was 61 years (range: 31–79) and 13 (33.3%) pts were females. All pts were Caucasians (94.9%) and non-oriental Asians (5.1%). Thirteen (33.3%) pts had received (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy and 16 (41.0%) pts had prior oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Grades 3–4 toxicities were anaemia 2.6%, neutropenia 15.4%, febrile neutropenia 10.3%, diarrhoea 35.9%, nausea 2.6%, vomiting 5.1%, lethargy 15.4% and skin rash 7.7%. For the pts treated at RDL, the objective tumour response rate was 11.1% (3 partial responses [PRs]; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.4–29.2%) and the disease control rate was 40.7% (3PRs, 8 stable diseases lasting for ≥12 weeks). The median time to progression was 4.2 months and median survival was 9.3 months. Six-month progression free survival was 22.2% (95% CI: 6.5–37.9%) and 6-month overall survival was 73.4% (95% CI: 56.5–90.3%). Preliminary pharmacokinetic data suggested that the addition of irinotecan to gefitinib resulted in an average of 14–33% increase in exposure to gefitinib (p<0.05). Conclusions: Irinotecan and gefitinib at this dose schedule was tolerable. Gefitinib did not appear to add substantial efficacy to irinotecan. The relative low dose of irinotecan at the RDL and the rarity of EGFR somatic mutation in CRC may be contributory to the modest activity of irinotecan and gefitinib combination.

[Table: see text]

Efficacy and tolerability of chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced oesophago-gastric cancer: A pooled analysis of three clinical trials

The aim of this study was to determine the benefits of chemotherapy for oesophago-gastric cancer (OGC) in patients 70 years and above (> or =70) in comparison to younger patients. 1080 patients were enrolled into three randomised controlled trials assessing fluorouracil-based combination chemotherapy. Patients received either a platinum-containing regimen (ECF, MCF), PVI 5-FU (protracted venous infusion of 5-fluorouracil)+/-mitomycin C (MMC), or FAMTX. Of the 1080 patients randomised, 257 (23.8%) were aged > or =70 years. There were no significant differences in the incidence of grades 3/4 toxicity between the two cohorts. Objective and symptomatic response rates, failure-free and overall survival were not significantly different. In a multivariate analysis, independent prognostic factors for survival were performance status and locally advanced disease, not age. Patients > or =70 years with OGC obtained similar benefits from palliative chemotherapy with respect to symptomatic response, tumour regression and survival, without increased toxicities.

Report of two protocol planned interim analyses in a randomised multicentre phase III study comparing capecitabine with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin with cisplatin in patients with advanced oesophagogastric cancer receiving ECF

The purpose of the study was to establish the optimal dose of capecitabine (X) to be used within a multicentre, randomised study evaluating the potential roles of oxaliplatin (O) and X in chemonaive patients (pts) with advanced oesophagogastric cancer. Two by two design was used, and pts were randomised to one of four regimens and stratified for extent of disease, performance status (PS) and centre. The treatment regimens are epirubicin, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil (ECF), EOF, ECX or EOX. Doses: E 50 mg m⁻², C 60 mg m⁻² and O 130 mg m⁻² i.v. 3 weekly; F 200 mg m⁻² day⁻¹ i.v. and X 500 mg m⁻² b.i.d.⁻¹ (escalated to 625 mg m⁻² b.i.d.⁻¹ after results of first interim analysis) p.o., continuously. First interim analysis was performed when 80 pts had been randomised. Dose-limiting fluoropyrimidine toxicities were stomatitis, palmar plantar erythema (PPE) and diarrhoea; 5.1% of X-treated pts experienced grade 3/4 toxicity. Protocol planned dose escalation of X to 625 mg m⁻² b.i.d.⁻¹ was instituted and a second interim analysis has been performed; results are presented in this paper. A total of 204 pts were randomised at the time of the protocol planned 2nd interim analysis. Grade 3/4 fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity was seen in 13.7% pts receiving F, 8.4% pts receiving X 500 mg m⁻² b.i.d.⁻¹ and 14.7% pts receiving X 625 mg m⁻² b.i.d.⁻¹. Combined complete and partial response rates were ECF 31% (95% CI 18.7–46.3), EOF 39% (95% CI 25.9–53.1), ECX 35% (95% CI 21.4–50.3), EOX 48% (95% CI 33.3–62.8). Grade 3/4 fluoropyrimidine toxicity affected 14.7% of pts treated with X 625 mg m⁻² b.i.d.⁻¹, which is similar to that observed with F, confirming this to be the optimal dose. The replacement of C by O and F by X does not appear to impair efficacy. The trial continues to total accrual of 1000 pts.

Longitudinal quality of life and quality adjusted survival in a randomised controlled trial comparing six months of bolus fluorouracil/leucovorin vs. twelve weeks of protracted venous infusion fluorouracil as adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer

Longitudinal quality of life (QOL) assessment is infrequently made in adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer (CRC). This analysis aims to assess QOL and quality adjusted survival (QAS) in patients receiving adjuvant 5-FU for stage II and III CRC. We performed a multicentre study in which 801 patients were randomised to 6 months of bolus 5-FU/leucovorin (LV n = 404) or 12 weeks of protracted venous infusion (PVI) 5-FU (n = 397). There were significant differences in the deterioration of QOL scores at week 2 with bolus 5-FU/LV compared to PVI 5-FU (P < 0.001), coinciding with toxicity peak during the first cycle. Following week 12, global QOL recovered to baseline when PVI 5-FU was stopped but this was delayed with bolus 5-FU/LV until completion at week 24. QOL scores significantly improved in both arms during follow-up (P < 0.001) and reached a plateau by year 1 without incremental improvement between years 2 and 5. There was a trend towards better QAS with PVI 5-FU. Twelve weeks of adjuvant PVI 5-FU was associated with significantly better QOL during treatment and faster time to recovery compared to 6 months of bolus 5-FU/LV.

A randomised comparison between 6 months of bolus fluorouracil/leucovorin and 12 weeks of protracted venous infusion fluorouracil as adjuvant treatment in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

We performed a multicentre randomised trial to compare the efficacy and toxicity of 12 weeks of protracted venous infusion (PVI) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) against the standard bolus monthly regimen of 5-FU/leucovorin (LV) given for 6 months as adjuvant treatment in colorectal cancer (CRC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with curatively resected stage II and III CRC were randomly assigned to 5-FU/LV [5-FU 425 mg/m(2) intravenously (i.v.) and LV 20 mg/m(2) i.v. bolus days 1-5 every 28 days for 6 months] or to PVI 5-FU (300 mg/m(2)/day for 12 weeks).

RESULTS

Between 1993 and 2003, 801 eligible patients were randomised to 5-FU/LV (n=404) or PVI 5-FU (n=397). With a median follow-up of 5.3 years, 231 relapses and 220 deaths have been observed. Five-year relapse-free survival (RFS) was 66.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 61.6% to 71.3%] and 73.3% (95% CI 68.4% to 77.6%) with bolus 5-FU/LV and PVI 5-FU, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) 0.8; 95% CI 0.62-1.04; P=0.10]. Five-year overall survival (OS) was 71.5% (95% CI 66.4% to 75.9%) and 75.7% (95% CI 70.8% to 79.9%) with bolus 5-FU/LV and PVI 5-FU, respectively (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.61-1.03; P=0.083). There was a significant survival advantage for patients starting adjuvant chemotherapy within 8 weeks (P=0.044). Significantly less diarrhoea, stomatitis, nausea and vomiting, alopecia, lethargy, and neutropenia (all with P <0.0001) were seen with PVI 5-FU.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no OS difference between the two arms, although PVI 5-FU was associated with a trend towards better RFS and OS compared with bolus 5-FU/LV, as well as significantly less toxicity. Based on our results, the probability of 12 weeks of PVI 5-FU being inferior to 6 months of bolus 5-FU/LV is extremely low (P <0.005), and therefore shorter duration of adjuvant treatment should be explored further.

Phase III study of mitomycin-C with protracted venous infusion or circadian-timed infusion of 5-fluorouracil in advanced colorectal carcinoma

The combination of protracted venous infusion (PVI) fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitomycin-C has previously been shown to be superior to PVI 5-FU alone in terms of response rate and failure-free survival. This study explores the effect of dose intensification by circadian timing of 5-FU in this combination on response, toxicity, and survival. Patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma were randomized to receive PVI 5-FU 300 mg/m2 daily or circadian-timed infusion (CTI) of 5-FU, beginning at 600 mg/m2 and subsequently reduced to 450 mg/m2, delivered as a flat-rate infusion from 10:15 PM to 9:45 AM. Both groups received mitomycin-C at a dose of 7 mg/m2 given every 6 weeks. From April 1996 to August 1998, 320 patients were randomized, including 263 with metastatic disease and 21 with circumferential margin involvement. The overall response rate for the PVI 5-FU group was 38%, compared with 30.3% for the CTI group (P = 0.176). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of failure-free survival (8.0 months vs. 9.9 months; P = 0.131) or overall survival (15.8 months vs. 16.3 months; P = 0.275) between the treatment groups. There were no differences in global quality of life. Grade 3/4 diarrhea occurred significantly more frequently with CTI 5-FU (6.5% vs. 19.8%; P < 0.001); a nonsignificant trend toward increased incidences of grade 3/4 infection and palmar plantar erythema were observed with CTI 5-FU. This study confirms the high response rate and overall survival figures for the combination of PVI 5-FU and mitomycin-C in colorectal cancer. However, dose intensification of 5-FU using a circadian-timed, flat-rate infusion did not lead to improved response or survival.

Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer

BACKGROUND

The standard adjuvant treatment of colon cancer is fluorouracil plus leucovorin (FL). Oxaliplatin improves the efficacy of this combination in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. We evaluated the efficacy of treatment with FL plus oxaliplatin in the postoperative adjuvant setting.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 2246 patients who had undergone curative resection for stage II or III colon cancer to receive FL alone or with oxaliplatin for six months. The primary end point was disease-free survival.

RESULTS

A total of 1123 patients were randomly assigned to each group. After a median follow-up of 37.9 months, 237 patients in the group given FL plus oxaliplatin had had a cancer-related event, as compared with 293 patients in the FL group (21.1 percent vs. 26.1 percent; hazard ratio for recurrence, 0.77; P=0.002). The rate of disease-free survival at three years was 78.2 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 75.6 to 80.7) in the group given FL plus oxaliplatin and 72.9 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 70.2 to 75.7) in the FL group (P=0.002 by the stratified log-rank test). In the group given FL plus oxaliplatin, the incidence of febrile neutropenia was 1.8 percent, the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse effects was low, and the incidence of grade 3 sensory neuropathy was 12.4 percent during treatment, decreasing to 1.1 percent at one year of follow-up. Six patients in each group died during treatment (death rate, 0.5 percent).

CONCLUSIONS

Adding oxaliplatin to a regimen of fluorouracil and leucovorin improves the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer.

Axillary lymph node scarring and the association with tumour response following neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy for breast cancer

We observed that the axillary lymph nodes of some of our breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy (NCT) showed evidence of scarring. The purpose of this study is to determine whether such scarring exists and, if so, whether it is confined to neoadjuvant patients and may be related to response to therapy of the primary tumour. We examined the axillary lymph nodes of a consecutive series of 255 breast cancer patients, all of whom had undergone radical axillary dissection. Fifty-three had received NCT; the remainder formed the control group. A scar was defined as an area of cellular fibrous tissue >0.25 mm in diameter and for each patient scar count, median size and score were recorded. Nodes with scars were stained immunohistochemically (IHC) with 2 epithelial markers for the presence of occult micrometastases. The nodes of 20.7% of patients who had received NCT contained scars compared with 13.4% of controls. The median scar size was significantly greater in neoadjuvant patients (P<0.001) and within this group scar count and score were significantly higher (P=0.026 and 0.020) in those with no or minimal evidence of residual primary tumour. Scars which were IHC-positive for micrometastases were almost exclusively confined to neoadjuvant patients. Our results suggest that axillary lymph node scarring does exist, but is not a common phenomenon. It is more significant in neoadjuvant patients and within this group is most marked in those with the greatest primary tumour response to therapy. We believe that scarring is likely to represent downstaging of axillary disease. A prospective study involving a larger group of patients receiving NCT is indicated, to confirm these preliminary findings and establish whether scarring has prognostic or predictive potential.

Phase II study of the efficacy and tolerability of two dosing regimens of the farnesyl transferase inhibitor, R115777, in advanced breast cancer

PURPOSE

R115777 is an orally active farnesyl transferase inhibitor that specifically blocks farnesylation of proteins involved in growth-factor-dependent cell-signal-transduction pathways. We conducted a phase II study in 76 patients with advanced breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two cohorts of patients were recruited sequentially. The first cohort (n = 41) received a continuous dosing [CD] regimen of R115777 400 or 300 mg bid. The second cohort (n = 35) received 300 mg bid in a cyclical regimen of 21 days of treatment followed by 7 days of rest (intermittent dosing [ID]).

RESULTS

In the CD cohort, four patients (10%) had a partial response (PR) and six patients (15%) had stable disease at > or = 24 weeks (SD). In the ID cohort, five patients (14%) had a PR and three patients (9%) had prolonged SD. The first six patients in the CD cohort treated at 400 mg bid all developed grade 3 to 4 neutropenia, so the subsequent 35 patients were treated at 300 mg bid. The incidence of hematologic toxicity was significantly lower in the ID than in the CD (300-mg bid) cohort: grade 3 to 4 neutropenia (14% v 43%; P =.016) and grade 3 to 4 thrombocytopenia (3% v 26%; P =.013). One patient in the ID cohort developed grade 2 to 3 neurotoxicity compared with 15 patients in the CD cohort (3% v 37%; P =.0004).

CONCLUSION

The farnesyl transferase inhibitor R115777 has demonstrated clinical activity in patients with metastatic breast cancer, and the ID regimen has a significantly improved therapeutic index compared with the CD regimen.

Twelve weeks of protracted venous infusion of fluorouracil (5-FU) is as effective as 6 months of bolus 5-FU and folinic acid as adjuvant treatment in colorectal cancer

We performed a multicentre randomised trial to compare the efficacy and toxicity of 12 weeks of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) delivered by protracted intravenous infusion (PVI 5-FU) against the standard bolus regimen of 5-FU and folinic acid (5-FU/FA) given for 6 months as adjuvant treatment in colorectal cancer. A total of 716 patients with curatively resected Dukes' B or C colorectal cancer were randomised to 5-FU/FA (5-FU 425 mg m(-2) i.v. and FA 20 mg m(-2) i.v. bolus days 1-5 every 28 days for 6 months) or to PVI 5-FU alone (300 mg m(-2) day for 12 weeks). With a median follow-up of 19.8 months, 133 relapses and 77 deaths have been observed. Overall survival did not differ significantly (log rank P=0.764) between patients receiving 5-FU/FA and PVI 5-FU (3-year survival 83.2 vs 87.9%, respectively). Patients in the 5-FU/FA group had significantly worse relapse-free survival (RFS, log rank P=0.023) compared to those receiving PVI 5-FU (3-year RFS, 68.6 vs 80%, respectively). Grades 3-4 neutropenia, diarrhoea, stomatitis and severe alopecia were significantly less (P<0.0001) and global quality of life scores significantly better (P&<0.001) for patients in the PVI 5-FU treatment arm. In conclusion, infused 5-FU given over 12 weeks resulted in similar survival to bolus 5-FU and FA over a 6 month period, but with significantly less toxicity.

A randomised study of protracted venous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with or without bolus mitomycin C (MMC) in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary

No standard regimen has been identified for patients with a carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP). This study compared protracted venous infusion 5-fluorouracil (PVI 5-FU) with or without mitomycin C (MMC) in patients with CUP in a multicentre, prospectively randomised study. 88 patients were randomised to PVI 5-FU (300 mg/m(2)/day for a maximum of 24 weeks) +/-MMC (7 mg/m(2) 6 weekly for four courses). The overall response rate was 11.6% for PVI 5-FU alone compared with 20.0% for PVI 5-FU plus MMC (P=0.29). Median failure-free survival (FFS) was 4.1 months for PVI 5-FU and 3.6 months for PVI 5-FU plus MMC (P=0.78) with an equivalent overall survival (OS) (6.6 versus 4.7 months, P=0.60). Symptomatic benefit was observed in most patients in each arm. PVI 5-FU is a well tolerated outpatient treatment regimen for patients with CUP, although the addition of MMC provides little extra benefit. PVI 5-FU may be a potential reference regimen in randomised trials with newer chemotherapy agents in patients with CUP.

A multicentre, randomised phase III trial comparing protracted venous infusion (PVI) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with PVI 5-FU plus mitomycin C in patients with inoperable oesophago-gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

This randomised study compared protracted venous infusion (PVI) fluorouracil (5-FU) with PVI 5-FU plus mitomycin C (MMC) in patients with advanced oesophago-gastric cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred and fifty-four patients with adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma or undifferentiated carcinoma involving the oesophagus, oesophago-gastric junction or the stomach were randomised. The major end points were tumour response, survival, toxicity and quality of life.

RESULTS

The median age of patients treated was 72 years and the two arms were well-balanced for baseline demographic factors. The overall response rate was 16.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.5% to 22.7%] in patients treated with PVI 5-FU alone compared with 19.1% (95% CI 12.0% to 26.0%) for those treated with PVI 5-FU plus MMC (P = 0.555). Median time to treatment failure was 3.9 months for PVI 5-FU and 3.8 months for PVI 5-FU plus MMC (P = 0.195). Median survival was 6.3 months for PVI 5-FU and 5.3 months for PVI 5-FU plus MMC (P = 1.0). Toxicity was mild for both treatments. Symptomatic benefit measured by improvement in pain control, weight loss, dysphagia and oesophageal reflux was observed in over 64% of patients in each arm. Quality of life scores were comparable in each arm.

CONCLUSIONS

PVI 5-FU is a safe, effective form of palliation for patients with advanced oesophago-gastric cancer although the addition of MMC adds little extra benefit.

Multicenter randomized phase III trial comparing protracted venous infusion (PVI) fluorouracil (5-FU) with PVI 5-FU plus mitomycin in inoperable pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

To compare protracted venous infusion (PVI) fluorouracil (5-FU) with PVI 5-FU plus mitomycin (MMC) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer in a multicenter, prospectively randomized study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred eight patients were randomized to PVI 5-FU (300 mg/m(2)/d for a maximum of 24 weeks) or PVI 5-FU plus MMC (7 mg/m(2) every 6 weeks for four courses). The major end points were tumor response, survival, toxicity, and quality of life (QOL).

RESULTS

The two treatment groups were balanced for baseline demographic factors, and 62% had metastatic disease. The overall response rate was 8.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]) 3.2% to 13.7% for patients treated with PVI 5-FU alone compared with 17.6%; 95% CI 10.3% to 25.1% for PVI 5-FU plus MMC (P =.04). Median failure-free survival was 2.8 months for PVI 5-FU and 3.8 months for PVI 5-FU plus MMC (P =.14). Median survival was 5.1 months for PVI 5-FU and 6.5 months for PVI 5-FU plus MMC (P =.34). Toxicities in both arms were mild. There was an increased incidence of neutropenia in the 5-FU plus MMC arm (P <.01), although no differences in infection were seen. No patients developed hemolytic uremic syndrome. Global QOL improved significantly after 24 weeks of treatment compared with baseline for patients receiving 5-FU plus MMC, although there was no statistically significant difference in QOL between arms.

CONCLUSION

PVI 5-FU plus MMC resulted in a superior response rate in comparison with PVI 5-FU alone in advanced pancreatic cancer, but this did not translate into a survival advantage. These results emphasize the importance of chemotherapy in this setting and the continuing value of the fluoropyrimidines in pancreatic cancer.