Surgical strategy of esophageal resection and reconstruction for aortoesophageal fistula

Aortoesophageal fistula is a critical and life-threatening disease. The cardiovascular strategy for graft replacement has been widely discussed. However, the surgical strategy of esophageal resection and reconstruction for aortoesophageal fistula has rarely been discussed. The objective of this study is to establish a surgical strategy and procedure of esophageal resection and reconstruction for aortoesophageal fistula. Eleven patients with aortoesophageal fistula who underwent aortic graft replacement and esophagectomy between 2008 and 2015 at Kobe University Hospital were enrolled in this study. Patient characteristics, operative methods, and clinical outcomes were obtained by retrospective chart review. All 11 patients underwent graft replacement, esophagectomy, and omental wrapping. Ten esophagectomies were simultaneously accomplished in the same operative field as aortic graft replacement. Seven patients underwent subtotal esophagectomy from a left thoracotomy, and three patients underwent upper hemiesophagectomy from a median sternotomy. The other patient underwent staged esophagectomy from a right thoracotomy. Seven of 11 patients (63.6%) successfully underwent staged esophageal reconstruction. Pedicled jejunal transfer with supercharge and superdrainage were performed in six patients, and ileocecal reconstruction was performed in one patient. Median survival time in the patients with esophageal reconstruction was 21 months while that in the patients without esophageal reconstruction was 10 months. Six of 7 patients (85.7%) who underwent esophageal reconstructions were alive. Our surgical strategy for aortoesophageal fistula, which includes simultaneous graft replacement and esophagectomy in the same operative field and staged reconstruction by pedicled jejunal transfer to ensure omental wrapping, is feasible and promising.

Long-Term Stability of Minimally Invasive Radial Keratotomy for Mild to Moderate Keratoconus

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the long-term stability of minimally invasive radial keratotomy (mini-RK) for eyes with mild to moderate keratoconus.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational case series.

METHODS

Eleven eyes from 6 patients with hard contact lens (HCL)-intolerant keratoconus underwent mini-RK and were followed up for more than 5 years. The mini-RK consisted of 8 radial incisions with depths of 90% of the thinnest corneal thickness, based on the Lindstrom nomogram. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), keratometry, and corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) were examined preoperatively and for 5 to 10 years postoperatively. Changes in keratometric astigmatism were evaluated using power vector analysis. Severities of keratoconus preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively were graded using the Amsler-Krumeich classification.

RESULTS

The postoperative observation periods were from 6 to 10 years (mean, 7.9 years). There were no changes in the BCVA, ECD, and keratometric astigmatism. The mean keratometric refraction significantly decreased from 47.5 diopters (D) preoperatively to 44.0 D at 1 month after mini-RK (P = 0.037) and was stable over 5 years, whereas keratometric astigmatism did not change from preoperatively through the postoperative period (P > 0.59). Keratoconus of grade 2 or higher improved to lower grades.

CONCLUSIONS

The mini-RK treatment was safe and effective for HCL-intolerant eyes with mild to moderate keratoconus.

Head-to-Head Visual Comparison between Brain Perfusion SPECT and Arterial Spin-Labeling MRI with Different Postlabeling Delays in Alzheimer Disease

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Arterial spin-labeling MR imaging has been recently developed as a noninvasive technique with magnetically labeled arterial blood water as an endogenous contrast medium for the evaluation of CBF. Our aim was to compare arterial spin-labeling MR imaging and SPECT in the visual assessment of CBF in patients with Alzheimer disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 33 patients with Alzheimer disease or mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer disease, CBF images were obtained by using both arterial spin-labeling-MR imaging with a postlabeling delay of 1.5 seconds and 2.5 seconds (PLD_1.5 and PLD_2.5, respectively) and brain perfusion SPECT. Twenty-two brain regions were visually assessed, and the diagnostic confidence of Alzheimer disease was recorded.

RESULTS

Among all arterial spin-labeling images, 84.9% of PLD_1.5 and 9% of PLD_2.5 images showed the typical pattern of advanced Alzheimer disease (ie, decreased CBF in the bilateral parietal, temporal, and frontal lobes). PLD_1.5, PLD_2.5, and SPECT imaging resulted in obviously different visual assessments. PLD_1.5 showed a broad decrease in CBF, which could have been due to an early perfusion. In contrast, PLD_2.5 did not appear to be influenced by an early perfusion but showed fewer pathologic findings than SPECT.

CONCLUSIONS

The distinctions observed by us should be carefully considered in the visual assessments of Alzheimer disease. Further studies are required to define the patterns of change in arterial spin-labeling-MR imaging associated with Alzheimer disease.