[What regulations have launched autonomous communities to going forward on patient safety culture in healthcare organizations?]

INTRODUCTION

Patient Safety Culture is based on learning from incidents, developing preventive strategies to reduce the likelihood to happen and recognizing and accompanying those who have suffered unnecessary and involuntary harm derived from the health care received. To go ahead on patient safety culture entails facilitating the implementation of these behaviors and attitudes in healthcare professionals. Objective was to describe the regulations of some autonomous communities and national proposals for regulations changes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Search of normative changes made in the autonomous communities of Catalonia, Navarra and the Basque Country. Proposals for legislative changes at national level were agreed.

RESULTS

Activities and normative changes made in the autonomous communities of Catalonia, Navarre and the Basque Country are described and proposals for normative changes at the national level at short-term and long-term changes are made. In such a way that it is easier to advance in creating culture of patient safety in the whole National Health System CONCLUSION: Currently there is no global regulation that facilitates to advance in patient safety culture. Changes at the national legislation level are essential. It is at the Inter-territorial Council where the proposed legislative amendment should be defined, promoted by the representatives of the health systems of the autonomous communities.

[Point-of-care ultrasound: Is it time to include it in the paediatric specialist training program?]

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has become an essential tool for clinical practice in recent years. It should be considered as an extension of the standard physical examination, which complements and enriches it without substituting it. POCUS enables the physician to answer specific clinical questions about the diagnosis, to understand better the pathophysiological context, to orientate the treatment, and to perform invasive procedures more safely. Despite its current use in many centres, and in most paediatric sub-specialties, there are currently no specific recommendations addressing educational aims in the different training areas, as well as methodology practice and the certification process in paediatrics. These ingredients are essential for POCUS implementation in daily practice, with a quality guarantee in terms of efficiency and safety. Several POCUS experts in different paediatric medicine environments performed a non-systematic review addressing the main paediatric POCUS applications in paediatrics. The lack of educational programs in POCUS in Spain is also discussed, and the experience in the United States of America in this topic is provided. Considering the current situation of POCUS in paediatrics, we strongly believe that it is urgent to establish evidence-based recommendations for POCUS training that should be the base to develop educational programs and to include POCUS in the paediatric residency training.

Profile of the patient who suffers falls in the hospital environment: Multicenter study

AIMS

To analyse the profile of patients suffering from falls in the hospital environment.

METHOD

Longitudinal study, prospective follow-up of a cohort of patients recruited from May 2014 to March 2016. Medical, surgical and intensive care units of 5 acute hospitals of the Community of Andalusia participated. Patients older than 16 years were included. The variables of characterization were: age, sex, unit, stay, preventive measures, and those of result: level of consciousness, sensory deficits, mobility, number of falls, circumstances and consequences, medications, previous falls.

RESULTS

1,247 patients were recruited, of whom 977 completed the study. The incidence of falls was 2.35%. The average age of the faller was 73.6 years (P=.015). The event occurred mostly in women (56.5%) and in medical units (79%). The falls caused minor damage. Rearrangement of the furniture proved to be the only protective measure (OR= 3.95, 95% CI 1.46-10.68, P=.015). The predictors of the event were: having been admitted to the hospital after a fall (HR= 5.88, 95% CI 3.23-10.67, P<.001), followed by visual problems, frequent visits to the bathroom and having suffered previous falls.

CONCLUSIONS

The profile of the patient suffering falls in the hospital is presented as aged over 70 years old, female, admitted to a medical unit, during the night shift, being in bed and alone, without impaired level of consciousness and with a history of falls.

[Descriptive analysis of medication errors notified by Primary Health Care: Learning from errors]

Introducción y objetivo

El objetivo del presente estudio es describir los errores de medicación (EM) notificados en atención primaria analizando el ámbito, el daño y las causas, y orientando el análisis a las medidas para prevenir estos errores.

Material y métodos

Ámbito: Atención primaria. Servicio Madrileño de Salud. 2016.

Diseño

Estudio descriptivo transversal.

Participantes

Todas las notificaciones de EM realizadas desde los centros de salud en el sistema de notificación de incidentes de seguridad entre el 1 de enero y el 17 de noviembre de 2016 (n = 1.839).

Mediciones principales

Ámbito donde ocurrió el error, daño real, daño potencial y causa del error. Fueron clasificadas por un investigador. Se comprobó la concordancia con otro investigador.

Resultados

En el ámbito del centro de salud ocurrieron el 47% (IC95%: 44,8-49,3%) de los EM y en el entorno del paciente el 26,5% (IC95%: 24,5-28,6%). El 27,5% (IC95%: 24,1-30,8%) de los EM tenían potencialidad de daño grave. En el ámbito del centro de salud, la causa más frecuente fue la prescripción inadecuada: 27,4% (IC95%: 24,4-30,4%). En el entorno del paciente, la causa más frecuente fue el fallo en la comunicación profesional-paciente: 66% (IC95%: 61,8-70,2%), seguida por equivocaciones y despistes del paciente.

Conclusiones

La mitad de los errores de medicación notificados desde atención primaria tiene lugar en el centro de salud mientras que los EM del paciente son la cuarta parte. Uno de cada 4 es un error potencialmente grave. Las causas más importantes son la prescripción inadecuada (incluyendo indicación o dosis incorrecta, interacciones, contraindicaciones y alergias), los fallos en la comunicación profesional-paciente y los despistes en la autoadministración del paciente. Parece prioritario implantar sistemas de ayuda a la prescripción, prácticas seguras efectivas en comunicación profesional-paciente y ayudas que eviten los despistes en la autoadministración del paciente.

[Presurgical preparation and surgical site infection in neck surgery. The effect of the protocol adequacy in the improvement of the health care quality]

BACKGROUND

Surgical wound infection is one of the leading causes of healthcare-associated infections. One of the most common measures for its reduction is the pre-surgical preparation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the adequacy to the pre-surgical protocol in patients undergoing neck surgery and the relationship with the incidence of surgical wound infection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Observational cohort study, conducted from January 2011 to December 2017. Variables related to patient, pre-surgical preparation and infection were collected. Infection rate was calculated after a maximum period of 30days after surgery. The effect of the pre-surgical preparation's adequacy and infection was evaluated.

RESULTS

The study included 131 patients. The global adequacy of the pre-surgical protocol was 84.7%, being the main cause of inadequacy the application of the mouthwash (7.6% of the interventions). The overall incidence of surgical wound infection during the follow-up period was 4.6% (95%CI: 1.0%-8.2%). No relationship between the adequacy to the protocol and the presence of infection was found (P=.59).

CONCLUSIONS

Adequacy of the pre-surgical preparation in our hospital was high and the incidence of surgical wound infection was low, and no relationship was found between the two. The results show a high safety culture in this surgery. However, there is still room for improvement in the quality of care of our patients.

The importance of non-technical skills in modern surgical practice

The significance of technical skills and manual dexterity for surgeons is an indisputable fact. However, the systematic study of medical errors has revealed that a significant percentage of these errors are caused by factors related to non-technical skills. The review presented in this article intends to describe and explore the relevance of these non-technical skills, including: situational awareness, decision-making, leadership and communication. In conclusion, the authors propose that adequate importance needs to be given to these aptitudes to provide safe clinical care.

[Development of an educational intervention to activate patients in their safety]

OBJECTIVE

Examine the effects of an educational intervention to improve patients' level of activation and promote their participation improving their safety during health system pathway.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Selection and study of the care process on which to apply the research. Design and edition the audiovisual educational material. Intentional sampling of patients on the waiting list for scheduled operation by the Traumatology Service. Telephone collection through study's explanatory script. Realization of two focus groups, with heterogeneous distribution by gender, age and level of studies. Visualization of the educational video and exploration of aspects of interest through semi-structured questions script, based on the research objectives. Recording and transcription of generated speeches. Qualitative analysis of resulting information.

RESULTS

Patients are aware that failures and errors occur, and recognize the weaknesses of the system and professionals. The educational activity brings more value to people with less previous experience or less knowledge about the dynamics of the health system. The interaction between people with different experiences entails an exchange of knowledge, enhancing the educational effect of the intervention. The level of knowledge and the degree of activation increases in all participants, regardless of their starting situation.

CONCLUSIONS

Strengthening the role of the patient as a safety barrier through an educational intervention of an audiovisual nature is feasible in real conditions and useful for the objective pursued.

[Admission, discharge and triage guidelines for paediatric intensive care units in Spain]

A paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) is a separate physical facility or unit specifically designed for the treatment of paediatric patients who, because of the severity of illness or other life-threatening conditions, require comprehensive and continuous inten-sive care by a medical team with special skills in paediatric intensive care medicine. Timely and personal intervention in intensive care reduces mortality, reduces length of stay, and decreases cost of care. With the aim of defending the right of the child to receive the highest attainable standard of health and the facilities for the treatment of illness and rehabilitation, as well as ensuring the quality of care and the safety of critically ill paediatric patients, the Spanish Association of Paediatrics (AEP), Spanish Society of Paediatric Intensive Care (SECIP) and Spanish Society of Critical Care (SEMICYUC) have approved the guidelines for the admission, discharge and triage for Spanish PICUs. By using these guidelines, the performance of Spanish paediatric intensive care units can be optimised and paediatric patients can receive the appropriate level of care for their clinical condition.

[Impact of a strategy to improve the quality of care and risk management in a paediatric emergency department]

INTRODUCTION

Emergency departments are a high risk area for the occurrence of adverse events. The aim of this study is to analyse the impact of a strategy to improve the quality assurance and risk management in the notification of incidents in our Unit, and describe the improvement actions developed from the reported incidents.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective observational study was developed during one year, divided into two periods: P1 (Start: training session and implementation of the risk management process), and P2 (Start: feed-back session of incidents reported in P1 and improvement actions developed). In each period, the number of reported incidents in relation to the number of emergencies attended (‰) and the descriptive data of each incident were recorded. The improvement actions developed from the incidents reported in P1 were described.

RESULTS

The number of notifications from P1 (4.1‰; 95%CI 3.2-5.0‰) increased in P2 (10.9‰; 95%CI 9.8-10.2‰, P<.001). The most frequent incidents in P1 were medication (33.3%), and identification errors (25.9%): both were significantly reduced in P2 (16.9%, P=.001 and 9.3%, P<.001, respectively). In P2, prescription errors of the P1 were reduced (35.9% vs 62.9%, P=.02). The factors of "Knowledge and training" (23.5%) were the most frequent in P1, decreasing in P2 (7.4%, P<.001).

CONCLUSION

It is considered that the implementation of a risk management process, and the promotion of a safety culture, through training and feed-back sessions to all professionals, contributed to increase the volume of notifications in our Unit. The voluntary and anonymous reporting of incidents is useful to identify risks, and plan corrective measures, contributing to improve quality assurance and patient safety.

Admission, discharge and triage guidelines for paediatric intensive care units in Spain

A paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) is a separate physical facility or unit specifically designed for the treatment of paediatric patients who, because of the severity of illness or other life-threatening conditions, require comprehensive and continuous inten-sive care by a medical team with special skills in paediatric intensive care medicine. Timely and personal intervention in intensive care reduces mortality, reduces length of stay, and decreases cost of care. With the aim of defending the right of the child to receive the highest attainable standard of health and the facilities for the treatment of illness and rehabilitation, as well as ensuring the quality of care and the safety of critically ill paediatric patients, the Spanish Association of Paediatrics (AEP), Spanish Society of Paediatric Intensive Care (SECIP) and Spanish Society of Critical Care (SEMICYUC) have approved the guidelines for the admission, discharge and triage for Spanish PICUs. By using these guidelines, the performance of Spanish paediatric intensive care units can be optimised and paediatric patients can receive the appropriate level of care for their clinical condition.

[Creation and validation of a new in-house synthetic scale to measure patient safety culture]

OBJECTIVE

Creation and validation of a new in-house synthetic scale to measure patient safety culture.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Cross-sectional and descriptive study in which the results of the assessment of the level of safety culture in health and non-health professionals of a university hospital are collected using a new in-house synthetic scale as a measurement tool. It is called 'Questionnaire on patient safety culture in a Spanish speaking environment'. The construction process was carried out in six phases: Bibliographic search; Validation of the structure and content of the questionnaire by a group of experts in patient safety using a nominal group technique; Assumptions verification and exploratory factor analysis; Pilot test to ensure its compression by a convenience sample of expert professionals; Modification of version 1.1 after the relevant analyses and analysis of the reliability of the questionnaire.

RESULTS

The final version of the questionnaire had nine items, grouped into three factors a priori: Hospital Management support in patient safety, Perception of Safety, and Expectations and actions of the Managers/Supervisors that favour safety. The items were structured using a 5-point Likert scale. A general assessment item on patient safety at the Centre was also included, as well as five open questions to identify actions on patient safety undertaken by the Centre. Finally, the possibility of making observations in a section of free text was included. The comprehension analysis did not recommend, in any case, the revision of the wording or modification of the items. The Spearman and Pearson indices were similar, which allowed us to assume the linearity in the relationships proposed. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was satisfactory in all cases, which guaranteed the normal distribution of the variables. The sample was adequate to perform the factorial analysis. Both the Bartlett' sphericity test and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) index showed sample quality to perform the analysis. The recommendation of the exploratory factor analysis that advised eliminating 1 item was followed. Specifically, item 9 was eliminated: 'It is only a matter of luck that in my Centre no more errors occur that affect patients'. The analysis of our scale has shown that all the factorial loads were greater than 0.5, which indicates good explanatory capacity of the item for the Dimension. In total, the scale manages to explain more than 60% of the perception by professionals in patient safety, considering an acceptable loss of information.

CONCLUSIONS

A new and validated in-house scale has been created to measure patient safety culture in the Spanish speaking healthcare environment.

[Impact of overdiagnosis and overtreatment on the patient, the health system and society]

The medical activity displays a set of skills aimed at improving the health status of people. In this way, diagnoses are made, choices of tests and treatments are made, and decisions are made about what to do and what not to do that affect the lives of patients. In this article, we propose a reflection on overdiagnosis and overtreatment in relation to the factors that promote it and the impact they have on society, on the functioning of the health system and also directly on patients. Finally, we make some proposals on how to address this overuse considering that primary care is a privileged place to adapt and minimize the impact of the actions of the health system on the health of citizens and reduce the incidents of patient safety linked to the overdiagnosis and inappropriate use of tests and treatments that do not add value to the health of patients.

An experience in integrated management of clinical risks

BACKGROUND

Manage clinical risks under the integrated risk management model of the BUPA organization (British United Provident Association).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

BUPA is an international group that provides health insurance and healthcare services. The project has been limited to Europe and Latin America (ELA) and this article presents the results related to hospitals. The integral risk management model was based on a governance structure, a risk management framework and the risk management itself (continuous process of identification, evaluation, management, monitoring and reporting). For the latter, a catalog of potential clinical risks was drawn up, using the Joint Commission International (JCI) standards as a reference and applied to a hospital to identify the risk to which they were exposed in their daily activity. An evaluation was conducted, based on its impact and probability of occurrence and depending on the residual and inherent score obtained, the action on each risk and the effectiveness of the controls were determined. A continuous monitoring of the risk profile and the information to share with the Board was defined.

RESULTS

The catalog consisted of 126 risks and 479 controls, divided by areas of application. In the assessment of the inherent risk, 84% of the risks were at an acceptable and assumable level, and in 16% it was necessary to establish an action plan.

CONCLUSIONS

Under the conditions of the study, we believe the benefits of implementing an integrated management of clinical risk system consisted in providing services that meet the legal requirements and standards of good practice (in our case, the JCI's standards). They allowed us to advance in the organization's management of, improving its efficiency in the allocation of resources for risk management and adaptation to the environment and the patient. In addition, this strategy can facilitate decision-making and encourage the organization's transformation capacity.

[Management of adverse events in an Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Unit]

INTRODUCTION

Patient safety in oral and maxillofacial surgery is oriented towards providing patient care by means of adequate risk management that minimises adverse events and fosters a culture of safe clinical practices as the fundamental basis of quality health care. To implement preventive actions are implemented in order to improve patient safety and to reduce the incidence of adverse events, as well as to improve the quality of care. The aim of this report is to implement preventive measures in order to improve the health care of the patient in an Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Unit by reducing the Adverse Events and proving good quality healthcare.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A longitudinal, prospective, single centre study was conducted using a methodology of analysis of modes of failure and effects of the management of potentially serious adverse events in the Oral and Maxillofacial surgical unit of the University Hospital of Granada (June-November 2017), as well as the preparation and implementation of a series of corrective measures.

RESULTS

A total of 33 adverse events were recorded, with 10 of them considered as critical, distributed in different areas of care, and referred from Primary Health Care and from other hospitals. Seven preventive actions were implemented: information to the patient, training actions, improvements in the protocols and procedures, in the care process and clinical practice, as well as the need to set up an adequate checklist, and other miscellaneous.

DISCUSSION

The implementation of preventive measures represent a notable advance in the prevention of harm to the patient and the organisation, involving healthcare staff in a safety culture oriented towards quality care.

[Critically ill patient isolation: risk or protection?]

INTRODUCTION

Isolation precautions are an effective measure to prevent the spread of multi-resistant microorganisms (MMR). However, its implementation is complex and can increase some risks to the patient. The aim of this study is to determine whether the implementation of isolation precautions increase the risk of patient safety incidents (PSI) in critically ill patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective observational study was conducted involving patients admitted to the ICU of a University Hospital, and that required isolation for more than 48h. Period of study: two years (from 2013/03/01 to 2015/03/31). Data source was the electronic medical record. The tools for evaluation were the Modular Review Form questionnaires (MRF1 and MRF2). An analysis was made of PSI and adverse events (AEs) during periods with and without isolation precautions, including the PSI type, severity, and preventability.

RESULTS

The study included a total of 76 patients, 74 of whom had at least one PSI. A total of 798 PSI were detected (511 during isolation period), 599 were a No harm incident (NHI) and 199 were adverse AEs. The most frequent PSIs were associated with medication (316) and patient health care (279). Most of them were moderately or highly preventable. The incidence of PSI during periods with and without isolation was 27.3 (SD 33.8) and 29 (39.6) per 100 patient-days, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

PSIs in ICU are frequent, and the most of them are preventable. The adoption of isolation precautions does not constitute a risk factor for PSI. Improving patient safety culture is essential for an adequate prevention strategy.

[Patient safety in psychiatric hospitalization - What incidents are reported and managed?]

INTRODUCTION

Reporting and management systems monitoring patient safety incidents (PSIs) facilitate the understanding of mechanisms of action and allow work on improvement activities to minimise their occurrence. In our country, little is known about the adverse effects of healthcare during psychiatric hospitalisation (PH). The aim of this study is to determine the occurrence and characteristics of the PSIs, as well as the improvement actions resulting from them, in the PH services being offered at the Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Deu (an institution specialized in mental healthcare).

MATERIAL AND METHOD

An observational, descriptive, and cross-sectional study was conducted, covering the period 2013-2016. Analysis was made of the PSIs reported in the following areas of PH: acute and sub-acute (ASA), and medium and long-term stay (MLS). The following variables were identified: number, type and level of harm resulting from the PSIs, professional category of the person declaring the PSI, method of analysis used to investigate the PSI, and improvement actions generated by those PSIs that required either root-cause analysis or audit reports. The chi-squared test was used for statistical purposes when comparing percentages.

RESULTS

A total of 2,940 PSIs were reported. The frequency in ASA was significantly higher (7.1 per 1,000 stays) than in MLS (5.3). Almost all (97.6%) of the incidents were related to falls, aggressive and/or disturbed behaviour, mind-altering drugs, self-harm, medication, dangerous objects, and patients escaping. PSIs recording moderate or severe harm were similar in the 2 different areas (16.5% in ASA vs. 14.2% in MLS). A small percentage (1.02%) of the PSIs resulted in root cause analysis or audit reporting, due to their severity, and from those incidents, 56 improvement actions were generated.

CONCLUSIONS

PH demonstrates its own characteristics with regard to the type of PSIs and differs from general hospitalisation. Reporting of PSIs is higher in ASA than in MLS, although the level of harm experienced by the patients is similar. There is a clear understanding of reporting in PH, demonstrated by the steady increase in the numbers declared and also highlights the high level of awareness of the nursing staff.

Medical Malpractice Issues in Dermatology: Clinical Safety and the Dermatologist

Clinical safety and medical liability are first-order concerns in today's medical practice. It is important to understand the circumstances under which medical acts fail to live up to the accepted standard of care and to recognize the impact that malpractice claims have on physicians. Practitioners must also grasp the concept of medical error, studying malpractice claims in order to identify the areas where improvement is needed. The risk of accusations of malpractice in dermatology is comparatively low, both in Spain and worldwide. However, a great variety of clinical scenarios in dermatology can potentially give rise to a claim, and malignant melanoma is most susceptible to risk. Dermatologists should know which actions during clinical consultation merit particular attention and care. Clinical practice carries inherent risk of malpractice claims, but taking certain recommended precautions can prevent them.

[Medication errors in a hospital emergency department: study of the current situation and critical points for improving patient safety]

OBJECTIVES

To determine the frequency of medication errors and incident types in a tertiary-care hospital emergency department. To quantify and classify medication errors and identify critical points where measures should be implemented to improve patient safety.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Prospective direct-observation study to detect errors made in June and July 2016.

RESULTS

The overall error rate was 23.7%. The most common errors were made while medications were administered (10.9%). We detected 1532 incidents: 53.6% on workdays (P=.001), 43.1% during the afternoon/evening shift (P=.004), and 43.1% in observation areas (P=.004).

CONCLUSION

The medication error rate was significant. Most errors and incidents occurred during the afternoon/evening shift and in the observation area. Most errors were related to administration of medications.

[Medication reconciliation errors according to patient risk and type of physician prescriber identified by prescribing tool used]

OBJECTIVES

To study the frequency of medication reconciliation errors (MREs) in hospitalized patients and explore the profiles of patients at greater risk. To compare the rates of errors in prescriptions written by emergency physicians and ward physicians, who each used a different prescribing tool.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Prospective cross-sectional study of a convenience sample of patients admitted to medical, geriatric, and oncology wards over a period of 6 months. A pharmacist undertook the medication reconciliation report, and data were analyzed for possible associations with risk factors or prescriber type (emergency vs ward physician).

RESULTS

A total of 148 patients were studied. Emergency physicians had prescribed for 68 (45.9%) and ward physicians for 80 (54.1%). A total of 303 MREs were detected; 113 (76.4%) patients had at least 1 error. No statistically significant differences were found between prescriber types. Factors that conferred risk for a medication error were use polypharmacy (odds ratio [OR], 3.4; 95% CI, 1.2-9.0; P=.016) and multiple chronic conditions in patients under the age of 80 years (OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.1-14.7; P=.039).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of MREs is high regardless of whether the prescriber is an emergency or ward physician. The patients who are most at risk are those taking several medications and those under the age of 80 years who have multiple chronic conditions.

[Analysis of drug-related problems in a tertiary university hospital in Barcelona (Spain)]

OBJECTIVE

To describe drug-related problems identified in hospitalized patients and to assess physicians' acceptance rate of pharmacists' recommendations.

METHODS

Retrospective observational study that included all drug-related problems detected in hospitalized patients during 2014-2015. Statistical analysis included a descriptive analysis of the data and a multivariate logistic regression to evaluate the association between pharmacists' recommendation acceptance rate and the variable of interest.

RESULTS

During the study period 4587 drug-related problems were identified in 44,870 hospitalized patients. Main drug-related problems were prescription errors due to incorrect use of the computerized physician order entry (18.1%), inappropriate drug-drug combination (13.3%) and dose adjustment by renal and/or hepatic function (11.5%). Acceptance rate of pharmacist therapy advice in evaluable cases was 81.0%. Medical versus surgical admitting department, specific types of intervention (addition of a new drug, drug discontinuation and correction of a prescription error) and oral communication of the recommendation were associated with a higher acceptance rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study allow areas to be identified on which to implement optimization strategies. These include training courses for physicians on the computerized physician order entry, on drugs that need dose adjustment with renal impairment, and on relevant drug interactions.

[Use of complementary tests in emergencies and their relation with patient safety incidents]

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the use of complementary tests and their relationship with safety incidents in hospital emergency departments.

METHODOLOGY

An analysis was performed on 935 patients seen in the 9 hospital emergency departments. The source of data used for the detection of incidents were: emergency department clinical record and reports, together with face-to-face observation in the department, plus a telephone survey of the patient or family member at one week after the care. Statistical tests used: The Student t test for quantitative variables, Chi squared test for qualitative variables, and the ANOVA test.

RESULTS

A peripheral venous catheter was used in 397 patients (42.4% (95% CI; 39.3-45.5%)), with a variability with significant differences between hospitals (P<.01), with a range of use from 37% to 81.8%. It was also observed that in 23.4% (95% CI; 19.2-27.6%) of the cases, the catheter was not used after the first blood draw. Radiological tests were requested for 351 patients, 37.7% (95% CI; 34.6-40.8%), also with significant differences between hospitals (P<.01), ranging from 24.6 to 65, 1%. Incidents were detected in 95 (10.2%) patients (95% CI; 8.3-12.1%) in the all the study centres. A higher proportion of safety incidents have been observed in patients where peripheral venous catheter has been used (12.8%) than in those in whom they had not been used (8.5%) (P=.03), as well as in patients on whom an x-ray was requested (12.8%) compared to those who did not (8.64%) (P=.04). A longer stay was also observed in cases with an incident (mean 248.9minutes) than in those where there were none (mean 164.1minutes) (P<.001). No statistically significant differences were found in the other parameters studied.

CONCLUSION

A relationship was observed between the use of a peripheral venous catheter (many of them without use) and radiological tests and the occurrence of safety incidents in the Emergency Departments.

[Experience of a single-centre in the preparation of choosing wisely lists in Internal Medicine]

OBJECTIVES

To identify areas for improvement, using a local list of interventions with low diagnostic and therapeutic usefulness for the 5 Related Diagnostic Groups, as well as the 5 main diagnoses most frequently seen in the hospital outpatient clinic.

METHOD

A literature review method was used, supplemented with a Delphi process with 2 rounds. In the first round, participants in the selection process identified low-value interventions in relation to the most frequently observed diagnoses. In the second round, those interventions with lower usefulness were selected based on their frequency, cost, and risk to the patient.

RESULTS

Out of a total of 100 recommendations made by 19 scientific societies, 23 received the highest number of votes in the first round. In the second round, 5 recommendations were selected for inpatients and 5 recommendations for outpatients.

CONCLUSIONS

A simple method is described for developing a local guide to reduce the use of unnecessary medical interventions.

Quality indicators in the treatment of patients with depression, bipolar disorder or schizophrenia. Consensus study

OBJECTIVE

To define a set of indicators for mental health care, monitoring quality assurance in schizophrenia, depression and bipolar disorders in Spain.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Qualitative research. Consensus-based study involving 6 psychiatrists on the steering committee and a panel of 43 psychiatrists working in several health services in Spain. An initial proposal of 44 indicators for depression, 42 for schizophrenia and 58 for bipolar disorder was elaborated after reviewing the literature. This proposal was analysed by experts using the Delphi technique. The valuation of these indicators in successive rounds allowed those with less degree of consensus to be discarded. Feasibility, sensitivity and clinical relevance were considered. The study was carried out between July 2015 and March 2016.

RESULTS

Seventy indicators were defined by consensus: 17 for major depression, 16 for schizophrenia, 17 for bipolar disorder and 20 common to all three pathologies. These indicators included measures related to adequacy, patient safety, exacerbation, mechanical restraint, suicidal behaviour, psychoeducation, adherence, mortality and physical health.

CONCLUSIONS

This set of indicators allows quality monitoring in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia, depression or bipolar disorder. Mental health care authorities and professionals can use this proposal for developing a balanced scorecard adjusted to their priorities and welfare objectives.

[Detection of adverse events using trigger tools in 2hospital units in Spain]

INTRODUCTION

Adverse events (AE) related to health care are frequent due to the nature of this activity, and for this reason, it is necessary to develop methods to detect them and prevent their recurrence. One of these methods uses what are called trigger tools, which are markers that allow AE to be identified retrospectively for subsequent analysis.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the usefulness of a trigger tools system to detect AE related to patient safety in Internal Medicine and General Surgery units of a tertiary referral hospital. As secondary objectives, measurements were made of the rate of AE, its prevalence in admissions, as well as a description of the different types of AE, and to evaluate the time spent using this tool.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective descriptive study of patients admitted to the units of Internal Medicine and General Surgery and discharged during 2016. Inclusion criteria were hospital stay over 24h and the presence of a complete clinical record of the studied acute episode. Patients admitted to short-stay units were excluded. A verification questionnaire was designed to registry key study variables and associated AE.

RESULTS

The study included 118 patients from Internal Medicine and 115 from General Surgery. The presence of at least one trigger was detected in 86 (72.9%) Internal Medicine and 56 (48.7%) General Surgery patients. Of these, 13 (15.1%) were associated with the presence of an AE in Internal Medicine and 34 (60.7%) in General Surgery. The trigger tool system failed to detect 7 AE, 4 of them in Internal Medicine. The median of triggers identified in each patient was 1.5 (IQR p25-p75: 1-2.5) in Internal Medicine and 2 (IQR p25-p75: 1-4) in General Surgery. In total, 262 positive triggers were detected, of which 157 corresponded to Internal Medicine, most of them related to early emergency re-admission after discharge. Most of the identified AEs required re-hospitalisation or extending the length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Trigger tools systems are useful for the detection and characterisation of AE, which helps to analyse and implement improvement measures.

Use of hydrotherapy during labour: Assessment of pain, use of analgesia and neonatal safety

AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness of the use of hydrotherapy in pain perception and requesting analgesia in women who use hydrotherapy during childbirth and to identify possible adverse effects in infants born in water.

METHOD

A multicentre prospective cohort study was performed between September 2014 and April 2016. A total of 200 pregnant women were selected and assigned to the hydrotherapy group (HG) or the control group (CG) according to desire and availability of use, data collection started at 5cm dilatation. The instruments used were the numerical rating scale (NRS), use of analgesia, Apgar Test, umbilical cord pH and NICU admission. Participants were distributed into: HG (n=111; 50 water birth) and CG (n=89).

RESULTS

Pain at 30 and 90min was lower in the HG than in the CG (NRS 30min 6.7 [SD 1.6] vs 7.8 [SD 1.2] [P<.001] and NRS 90min 7.7 [SD 1.2] vs. 8.9 [SD 1.1] [P<.001]). During the second stage of labour, pain was lower in pregnant women undergoing a water birth (NRS HG 8.2 [SD 1.2], n=50; NRS CG 9.5 [SD 0.5], n=89 [P<.001]). Relative to the use of analgesia, in the CG 30 (33.7%) pregnant women requested epidural analgesia vs. 24 (21.1%) pregnant women in HG (P=.09). The neonatal parameters after water birth were not modified compared to those born out of water.

CONCLUSION

The use of hydrotherapy reduces pain during labour, and during second stage in women who undergo a water birth and the demand for analgesia decreases in multiparous pregnant women. No adverse effects were seen in infants born under water.