[Endoscopic therapy for cancer of the esophagogastric junction]

In Japan, the criteria for cancer of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) are that the center of the lesions are located within 2cm from the EGJ orally and anally. The main histology of these lesions are squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. Squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus is treated following the guidelines published by the Japan Esophageal Society. This paper focuses on EGJ adenocarcinomas, which include cardiac gastric cancer and Barrett's cancer originating from the short-segment Barrett's esophagus. EGJ cancer is resected endoscopically at the termination of the palisade vessels or upper end of the gastric fold. The various types of cancer involving the EGJ are treated following the guidelines published by each medical specialist society in Japan. The main endoscopic treatment is endoscopic submucosal dissection. The EGJ is a narrow space, and therefore lesions are approached from the oral approach or anal approach using a reverse endoscope. Bleeding, perforation, and stenosis are major complications. When two-thirds or more of the wall is resected, stenosis occurs. Endoscopic therapy for cancer originating in the EGJ has not yet been fully established.

[LAPAROSCOPIC FUNDOPLICATION NISSEN--GOLD STANDARD TREATMENT OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX IN CHILDREN]

Gastroesophageal reflux is very common in children and often leads to reflux-esophagitis, peptic esophageal strictures, Barrett's esophagus. If the conservative treatment fails a patient needs surgical treatment as well as those who suffer from complications and hiatal hernia. The most popular operation is laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with the efficiency of more than 80%. However, the main challenge is redo fundoplications. Hiatal hernia and operation technique are considered to be the most probable risk-factors.In our study we introduce the new technique of laparoscopic Nissen procedure. It implies different way of the fundoplication wrap construction: in the first row we use sutures through all the layers of the stomach wall instead of seromuscular ones. Since 2010 more than 180 patients have been operated on with the incidence of recurrent reflux 2 times lower.

[SOME ASPECTS OF DIAGNOSIS AND COMPREHENSIVE TREATMENT OF BARRETT'S ESOPHAGUS]

OBJECTIVE

Assess the value of routine endoscopy in the diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus (BE) in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and to show the feasibility of a comprehensive treatment algorithm that includes antireflux surgery as an essential component.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was conducted on a sample of 171 patients with Barrett's esophagus who underwent antireflux surgery. In evaluating the operating characteristics of endoscopy were recruited another 675 patients with GERD without BE. On the diagnostic phase was used endoscopy with double chromoscopy and biopsy followed by histological examination. At the stage of treatment, patients received conservative therapy by PPl after which underwent antireflux surgery and argon-plasma coagulation (in some cases).

RESULTS

Endoscopy of the esophagus with a double chromoscopy in identification BE in patients with GERD, has a moderate sensitivity (71.9%, 95% Cl 64.6%-78.5%) and high specificity (100%, 95% Cl 99.5%-100%). A comprehensive treatment approach that includes antireflux surgery as an essential component has allowed to achieve excellent and satisfactory immediate results of treatment in 88.9% of patients (95% Cl 83.2%-93.2%). Excellent and satisfactory long-term results were achieved in 89.5 % of patients (95% Cl 83.9%-93.6 %).

CONCLUSION

The results indicate the need for biopsy and histological examination in all patients with GERD, who has no suspicion of BE according to endoscopy, and prove high efficiency of complex treatment algorithm that includes antireflux surgery as an essential component.

Endoscopic management of high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma: experience in a large academic medical center

BACKGROUND

Esophagectomy has been the standard treatment for Barrett's esophagus (BE) with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and intramucosal cancer (IMC). Recently, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) have become the preferred treatment for these patients in some centers. We report a single institution series of patients undergoing endoscopic management of HGD and IMC.

METHODS

Nineteen patients underwent endoscopic treatment for HGD or IMC between 2009 and 2012. The primary outcome measure was progression of BE necessitating esophagectomy. Secondary outcomes included complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM), complete eradication of dysplasia (CE-D), recurrence or progression of BE or dysplasia, and complications. Patients were followed for a median follow-up interval of 19 months following completion of RFA treatment.

RESULTS

Three patients (16 %) had a presenting diagnosis of IMC, and 16 (84 %) were treated for HGD. Twelve (63 %) had long-segment BE; the median length of BE was 5 cm. Ten (53 %) patients underwent EMR prior to RFA. CE-D was achieved in 88 % of patients, and CE-IM was achieved in 65 % of patients. A median of 2 (1-7) treatments were required, and there were no immediate post-procedure complications. Two patients developed recurrent dysplasia following complete eradication of BE, and each case was successfully managed with repeat RFA. Three patients (16 %) required esophagectomy within 6 months following RFA. A complete surgical resection was achieved in each case, and none of the patients developed lymph node metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete eradication of HGD and IMC can be achieved via endoscopic therapy, thus avoiding esophagectomy in the majority of patients. However, a subset of patients will fail this treatment approach and will require surgical resection. With aggressive endoscopic treatment and surveillance, these patients can be identified at an early stage while curative resection is still possible.

Controversies in Barrett esophagus

Barrett esophagus develops when metaplastic columnar epithelium predisposed to develop adenocarcinoma replaces esophageal squamous epithelium damaged by gastroesophageal reflux disease. Although several types of columnar metaplasia have been described in Barrett esophagus, intestinal metaplasia with goblet cells currently is required for a definitive diagnosis in the United States. Studies indicate that the risk of adenocarcinoma for patients with nondysplastic Barrett esophagus is only 0.12% to 0.38% per year, which is substantially lower than previous studies had suggested. Nevertheless, the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma continues to rise at an alarming rate. Regular endoscopic surveillance for dysplasia is the currently recommended cancer prevention strategy for Barrett esophagus, but a high-quality study has found no benefit of surveillance in preventing deaths from esophageal cancer. Medical societies currently recommend endoscopic screening for Barrett esophagus in patients with multiple risk factors for esophageal adenocarcinoma, including chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease, age of 50 years or older, male sex, white race, hiatal hernia, and intra-abdominal body fat distribution. However, because the goal of screening is to identify patients with Barrett esophagus who will benefit from endoscopic surveillance and because such surveillance may not be beneficial, the rationale for screening might be made on the basis of faulty assumptions. Endoscopic ablation of dysplastic Barrett metaplasia has been reported to prevent its progression to cancer, but the efficacy of endoscopic eradication of nondysplastic Barrett metaplasia as a cancer preventive procedure is highly questionable. This review discusses some of these controversies that affect the physicians and surgeons who treat patients with Barrett esophagus. Studies relevant to controversial issues in Barrett esophagus were identified using PubMed and relevant search terms, including Barrett esophagus, ablation, dysplasia, radiofrequency ablation, and endoscopic mucosal resection.

Endoscopic follow-up and management of Barrett's esophagus in relation to its preneoplastic potential

Barrett's esophagus is an acquired clinical condition in which the squamous epithelium of the distal esophagus is replaced by a columnar epithelium. The diagnosis requires histological confirmation of specialized intestinal metaplasia, in which goblet cells must be present. Barrett's esophagus is a risk factor for the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma, a tumor with an incidence and mortality have increased alarmingly in recent years in the western world. It has been estimated that the annual incidence of cancer in patients with Barrett's esophagus has increased from 0.2-2%. Once diagnosed, Barrett's esophagus is estimated to have an annual neoplastic transformation rate of 0.5% per patient. The highlights of the endoscopic diagnosis and treatment are reviewed here, as well as the screening and monitoring of this process.

The impact of endoscopic ultrasound findings on clinical decision making in Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia or early esophageal adenocarcinoma

The clinical utility of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for staging patients with Barrett's esophagus and high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or intramucosal carcinoma (IMC) prior to endoscopic therapy is unclear. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with HGD or IMC referred to an American medical center for endoscopic treatment between 2004 and 2010. All patients had pretreatment staging by EUS. We examined the frequency that EUS findings consistent with advanced disease (tumor invasion into the submucosa, lymph node involvement, or regional metastasis) led to a change in management. The analysis was stratified by nodularity and pre-EUS histology. We identified one hundred thirty-five patients with HGD (n = 106, 79%) or IMC (n = 29, 21%) had staging by EUS (79 non-nodular, 56 nodular). Pathologic lymph nodes or metastases were not found by EUS. There were no endosonographic abnormalities noted in any patient with non-nodular mucosa (0/79). Abnormal EUS findings were present in 8/56 patients (14%) with nodular neoplasia (five IMC, three HGD). Endoscopic mucosal resection was performed in 44 patients with a nodule, with 13% (6/44) having invasive cancer. In nodular neoplasia, the EUS and endoscopic mucosal resection were abnormal in 24% (5/21) and 40% (6/15) of those with IMC and 9% (3/35) and 0% (0/29) of those with HGD, respectively. In this study we found that EUS did not alter management in patients with non-nodular HGD or IMC. Because the diagnostic utility of EUS in subjects with non-nodular Barrett's esophagus is low, the value of performing endoscopic mucosal resection in this setting is questionable. For patients with nodular neoplasia, resection of the nodule with histological examination had greater utility than staging by EUS.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic ablative treatment of Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the main risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Its therapeutic approach is controversial and surgical treatment in the presence of high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia may be indicated. Endoscopic approach is an alternative with lower mortality and morbidity rates and favorable results.

OBJECTIVE

To define the best option, according to literature, to treat Barrett's Esophagus.

DESIGN

Systematic review of PUBMED, EMBASE, LILACS, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted and articles of randomized, controlled studies on BE endoscopic ablative treatment were selected. The systematic review through PUBMED retrieved results with higher evidence level and available recommendation grade regarding BE ablative therapy. Nine articles on randomized, controlled studies classified as A or B according to the Oxford table were selected. Cryotherapy, laser, photodynamic therapy (PDT), multipolar electrocoagulation (MPEC), and ablation through argon plasma coagulation (APC) and radiofrequency were considered ablation therapies.

PATIENTS

649 patients from 10 different studies were analysed.

RESULTS

PDT was found to present an increase in treatment failure compared with APC, NNH = -7. BE ablation through MPEC or APC was found to have similar risk for treatment failure in meta-analysis. PDT associated with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) is beneficial for BE ablation regarding PPI use alone, NNT = 2.Radiofrequency with PPI is an efficient method to reduce risk of treatment failure, NNT = 1.

CONCLUSIONS

There are no studies demonstrating the benefit of indicating cryotherapy or laser therapy for BE endoscopic approach. APC ablation was found to have superior efficacy compared with PDT and ablation through APC and MPEC was found to present effective, similar results. Radiofrequency is the most recent approach requiring comparative studies for indication.

Immunohistochemical assessment of NY-ESO-1 expression in esophageal adenocarcinoma resection specimens

AIM: To assess NY-ESO-1 expression in a cohort of esophageal adenocarcinomas.

METHODS: A retrospective search of our tissue archive for esophageal resection specimens containing esophageal adenocarcinoma was performed, for cases which had previously been reported for diagnostic purposes, using the systematised nomenclature of human and veterinary medicine coding system. Original haematoxylin and eosin stained sections were reviewed, using light microscopy, to confirm classification and tumour differentiation. A total of 27 adenocarcinoma resection specimens were then assessed using immunohistochemistry for NY-ESO-1 expression: 4 well differentiated, 14 moderately differentiated, 4 moderate-poorly differentiated, and 5 poorly differentiated.

RESULTS: Four out of a total of 27 cases of esophageal adenocarcinoma examined (15%) displayed diffuse cytoplasmic and nuclear expression for NY-ESO-1. They displayed a heterogeneous and mosaic-type pattern of diffuse staining. Diffuse cytoplasmic staining was not identified in any of these structures: stroma, normal squamous epithelium, normal submucosal gland and duct, Barrett’s esophagus (goblet cell), Barrett’s esophagus (non-goblet cell) and high grade glandular dysplasia. All adenocarcinomas showed an unexpected dot-type pattern of staining at nuclear, paranuclear and cytoplasmic locations. Similar dot-type staining, with varying frequency and size of dots, was observed on examination of Barrett’s metaplasia, esophageal submucosal gland acini and the large bowel negative control, predominantly at the crypt base. Furthermore, a prominent pattern of apical (luminal) cytoplasmic dot-type staining was observed in some cases of Barrett’s metaplasia and also adenocarcinoma. A further morphological finding of interest was noted on examination of haematoxylin and eosin stained sections, as aggregates of lymphocytes were consistently noted to surround submucosal glands.

CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated for the first time NY-ESO-1 expression by esophageal adenocarcinomas, Barrett’s metaplasia and normal tissues other than germ cells.

Radiofrequency ablation vs endoscopic surveillance for patients with Barrett esophagus and low-grade dysplasia: a randomized clinical trial

IMPORTANCE

Barrett esophagus containing low-grade dysplasia is associated with an increased risk of developing esophageal adenocarcinoma, a cancer with a rapidly increasing incidence in the western world.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether endoscopic radiofrequency ablation could decrease the rate of neoplastic progression.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Multicenter randomized clinical trial that enrolled 136 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of Barrett esophagus containing low-grade dysplasia at 9 European sites between June 2007 and June 2011. Patient follow-up ended May 2013.

INTERVENTIONS

Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either endoscopic treatment with radiofrequency ablation (ablation) or endoscopic surveillance (control). Ablation was performed with the balloon device for circumferential ablation of the esophagus or the focal device for targeted ablation, with a maximum of 5 sessions allowed.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was neoplastic progression to high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma during a 3-year follow-up since randomization. Secondary outcomes were complete eradication of dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia and adverse events.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients were randomized to receive ablation and 68 to receive control. Ablation reduced the risk of progression to high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma by 25.0% (1.5% for ablation vs 26.5% for control; 95% CI, 14.1%-35.9%; P < .001) and the risk of progression to adenocarcinoma by 7.4% (1.5% for ablation vs 8.8% for control; 95% CI, 0%-14.7%; P = .03). Among patients in the ablation group, complete eradication occurred in 92.6% for dysplasia and 88.2% for intestinal metaplasia compared with 27.9% for dysplasia and 0.0% for intestinal metaplasia among patients in the control group (P < .001). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 19.1% of patients receiving ablation (P < .001). The most common adverse event was stricture, occurring in 8 patients receiving ablation (11.8%), all resolved by endoscopic dilation (median, 1 session). The data and safety monitoring board recommended early termination of the trial due to superiority of ablation for the primary outcome and the potential for patient safety issues if the trial continued.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this randomized trial of patients with Barrett esophagus and a confirmed diagnosis of low-grade dysplasia, radiofrequency ablation resulted in a reduced risk of neoplastic progression over 3 years of follow-up.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

trialregister.nl Identifier: NTR1198.

Long-term maintenance effect of radiofrequency energy delivery for refractory GERD: a decade later

BACKGROUND

Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) often seek alternative therapy for inadequate symptom control, with over 40% not responding to medical treatment. We evaluated the long-term safety, efficacy, and durability of response to radiofrequency treatment of the lower esophageal sphincter (Stretta).

METHODS

Using an intent-to-treat analysis, we prospectively assessed 217 patients with medically refractory GERD before and after Stretta. There was no concurrent control group in the study. Primary outcome measure was normalization of GERD-health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) in 70% or greater of patients at 10 years. Secondary outcomes were 50% reduction or elimination of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and 60% or greater improvement in satisfaction at 10 years. Successful treatment was defined as achievement of secondary outcomes in a minimum of 50% of patients. Complications and effect on existing comorbidities were evaluated. The results of a 10-year study are reported.

RESULTS

The primary outcome was achieved in 72% of patients (95% confidence interval 65-79). For secondary outcomes, a 50% or greater reduction in PPI use occurred in 64% of patients, (41% eliminating PPIs entirely), and a 60% or greater increase in satisfaction occurred in 54% of patients. Both secondary endpoints were achieved. The most common side effect was short-term chest pain (50%). Pre-existing Barrett's metaplasia regressed in 85% of biopsied patients. No cases of esophageal cancer occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

In this single-group evaluation of 217 patients before and after Stretta, GERD-HRQL scores, satisfaction, and PPI use significantly improved and results were immediate and durable at 10 years.

[Radiofrequency ablation reduces the risk in Barrett's oesophagus with dysplasia]

Barrett's esophagus (BE) with dysplasia is generally accepted as the precursor to oesophageal cancer. Thus, methods to eradicate BE and dysplasia have been evaluated. Recently, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has shown promising results with few adverse effects. The studies concerning RFA are, however, small and heterogeneous. Only six studies have included more than 100 patients and only one is a prospective randomized trial. The purpose of this article is to describe the treatment of BE and especially the indications and challenges of RFA, including complications, buried glands and recurrence.

[Radio frequency ablation of Barrett's esophagus--can the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma be reduced?]

Barrett's esophagus occurs in a little less than 2% of the population. Of the patients, very few develop esophageal adenocarcinoma, and on the other hand only a small part of esophageal adenocarcinoma patients are diagnosed with Barrett's lesion. If Barrett's lesion has a separate visible elevated or depressed lesion it should first be treated with endoscopic mucosal resection, and thereafter the remaining Barrett's lesion should be destructed by a new technique called radiofrequency ablation, RFA. After destruction of the aberrant mucosal lesion with RFA it will be replaced with normal esophageal mucosa and the risk for malignant trasformation is dimished near to zero. RFA is considered the first-line treatment treatment option of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus.

Assessment of the diagnostic performance and interobserver variability of endocytoscopy in Barrett’s esophagus: A pilot ex-vivo study

AIM: To investigate a classification of endocytoscopy (ECS) images in Barrett’s esophagus (BE) and evaluate its diagnostic performance and interobserver variability.

METHODS: ECS was applied to surveillance endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) specimens of BE ex-vivo. The mucosal surface of specimen was stained with 1% methylene blue and surveyed with a catheter-type endocytoscope. We selected still images that were most representative of the endoscopically suspect lesion and matched with the final histopathological diagnosis to accomplish accurate correlation. The diagnostic performance and inter-observer variability of the new classification scheme were assessed in a blinded fashion by physicians with expertise in both BE and ECS and inexperienced physicians with no prior exposure to ECS.

RESULTS: Three staff physicians and 22 gastroenterology fellows classified eight randomly assigned unknown still ECS pictures (two images per each classification) into one of four histopathologic categories as follows: (1) BEC1-squamous epithelium; (2) BEC2-BE without dysplasia; (3) BEC3-BE with dysplasia; and (4) BEC4-esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in BE. Accuracy of diagnosis in staff physicians and clinical fellows were, respectively, 100% and 99.4% for BEC1, 95.8% and 83.0% for BEC2, 91.7% and 83.0% for BEC3, and 95.8% and 98.3% for BEC4. Interobserver agreement of the faculty physicians and fellows in classifying each category were 0.932 and 0.897, respectively.

CONCLUSION: This is the first study to investigate classification system of ECS in BE. This ex-vivo pilot study demonstrated acceptable diagnostic accuracy and excellent interobserver agreement.

Quality of life after laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Preliminary study

Laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) is the treatment of choice for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).Our paper evaluates post LF quality of life (QL). Patients treated between January 2008 and May 2011 by the same surgeon were asked to fill in the Velanovich questionnaires for Gastro - Oesophageal Reflux Disease - Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL). The 10 questions were designed to assess GERD specific symptoms prior to (part A) and after surgery (part B). The Velanovich score is 0 if the patient is asymptomatic and 50 if the symptoms are at maximum intensity. Only 32 out of the 54 patients operated during the study filled in the questionnaire:28 patients (87.5%) had hiatus hernia (HH), 16 cases were associated with reflux erosive esophagitis (EE), 4 patients had non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) and one had Barrett's esophagus (BE). We used Toupet partial posterior fund oplication for 12 patients and Nissen total fundoplication for 20 patients. The short gastric vessels were divided in all patients.The female - male ratio was 21:11 with a mean age of 55.13 years and the mean follow up period for questionnaire B was of25.2 months. The Velanovich A score was 29.9 Â+-10.9, and the follow up B score was 3.4Â+-2.4 (CI (95%) 22.9-39.9; p 0.05).There were no B score statistical differences between sex ratio(3.9 vs 2.4) and type of fundoplication (Nissen 3.2 vs Toupet4.1). 29 patients (90.62%) declared that their QL improved after surgery. The main indication for surgery present in almost every patient included in this study was the presence of theHH and RE. LF improved the quality of life of patients with GERD. There were no statistical differences of the Velanovich score according to GERD stage (EE, NERD with or without HH), sex ratio and type of LF, Toupet or Nissen.

Omitting of bougie appears to be safe for the performance of the fundal wrap at laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication

AIM

Some operative techniques in fundoplication seem to increase the incidence of obstructive symptoms. Some authors believe that using intraesophageal bougie and preparing a short and floppy valve in laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication will help to decrease any possible tight crus repair and wrap and so it is effective to decrease the prevalence of postoperative dysphagia. The aim of this study is to show that there is no absolute benefit of routine insertion of a bougie during laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in relation to post-operative dysphagia.

METHODS

All patients who underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication by a single surgeon between January 2001 and August 2011 were reviewed retrospectively. Esophageal bougie intubation was performed in none of the 154 patients. The operation technique, the duration of the operation, hospital stay and the improvement of the symptoms were assessed. The patients who had esophagitis with Barrett's esophagus and who had hiatal hernia that could not get benefit from medical therapy, were selected for the surgery. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with cruroraphy were done in all patients.

RESULTS

Ninety-six of the patients were female and 58 were male. The mean symptom duration was 3.6±0.6 years. The only complication was dysphagia. In eighth week, dysphagia resolved in all patients.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication can be safely performed without the routine use of an esophageal bougie and it does not increase the postoperative dysphagia rate.

Efficacy and durability of radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's Esophagus: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

In patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE), radiofrequency ablation (RFA) safely and effectively eradicates dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia. We aimed to determine the efficacy and durability of RFA for patients with dysplastic and nondysplastic BE.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies identified in PubMed and EMBASE that reported the proportion of patients treated with RFA who had complete eradication of dysplasia (CE-D) and intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM), and the proportion of patients with recurrent IM after successful treatment. Pooled estimates of CE-D, CE-IM, IM recurrence, and adverse events were calculated.

RESULTS

We identified 18 studies of 3802 patients reporting efficacy and 6 studies of 540 patients reporting durability. Ten were prospective cohort studies, 9 were retrospective cohort studies, and 1 was a randomized trial. CE-IM was achieved in 78% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 70%-86%) and CE-D was achieved in 91% (95% CI, 87%-95%). After eradication, IM recurred in 13% (95% CI, 9%-18%). Progression to cancer occurred in 0.2% of patients during treatment and in 0.7% of those after CE-IM. Esophageal stricture was the most common adverse event and was reported in 5% of patients (95% CI, 3%-7%). Confidence in most summary estimates was limited by a high degree of heterogeneity, which did not appear to be caused by single outlier studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of BE with RFA results in CE-D and CE-IM in a high proportion of patients, with few recurrences of IM after treatment and a low rate of adverse events. Despite the large amount of study heterogeneity, these data provide additional information for patients and providers to make informed treatment decisions.

Radical excision of Barrett's esophagus and complete recovery of normal squamous epithelium

To treat Barrett’s esophagus (BE), radiofrequency ablation or cryotherapy are effective treatments for eradicating BE with dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia, and reduce the rates of Barrett’s esophageal adenocarcinoma (BAC). However, patients with BE and dysplasia or early cancer who achieved complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia, BE recurred in 5% within a year, requiring expensive endoscopic surveillances. We performed endoscopic submucosal dissection as complete radically curable treatment procedure for BE with dysplasia, intestinal metaplasia and BAC.

Liquid nitrogen spray cryotherapy in Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia: long-term results

BACKGROUND

Liquid nitrogen endoscopic spray cryotherapy can safely and effectively eradicate high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus (BE-HGD). Long-term data on treatment success and safety are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the long-term safety and efficacy of spray cryotherapy in patients with BE-HGD.

DESIGN

Single-center, retrospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary-care referral center.

PATIENTS

A total of 32 patients with BE-HGD of any length.

INTERVENTION

Patients were treated with liquid nitrogen spray cryotherapy every 8 weeks until complete eradication of HGD (CE-HGD) and intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM) was found by endoscopic biopsy. Surveillance endoscopy with biopsies was performed for at least 2 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

CE-HGD, CE-IM, durability of response, disease progression, and adverse events.

RESULTS

CE-HGD was 100% (32/32), and CE-IM was 84% (27/32) at 2-year follow-up. At last follow-up (range 24-57 months), CE-HGD was 31/32 (97%), and CE-IM was 26/32 (81%). Recurrent HGD was found in 6 (18%), with CE-HGD in 5 after repeat treatment. One patient progressed to adenocarcinoma, downgraded to HGD after repeat cryotherapy. BE segment length ≥3 cm was associated with a higher recurrence of IM (P = .004; odds ratio 22.6) but not HGD. No serious adverse events occurred. Stricture was seen in 3 patients (9%), all successfully dilated.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective study design, small sample size.

CONCLUSION

In patients with BE-HGD, liquid nitrogen spray cryotherapy has an acceptable safety profile and success rate for eliminating HGD and IM and is associated with a low rate of recurrence or progression to cancer with long-term follow-up.