Effect of valsartan on the incidence of diabetes and cardiovascular events

BACKGROUND

It is not known whether drugs that block the renin-angiotensin system reduce the risk of diabetes and cardiovascular events in patients with impaired glucose tolerance.

METHODS

In this double-blind, randomized clinical trial with a 2-by-2 factorial design, we assigned 9306 patients with impaired glucose tolerance and established cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular risk factors to receive valsartan (up to 160 mg daily) or placebo (and nateglinide or placebo) in addition to lifestyle modification. We then followed the patients for a median of 5.0 years for the development of diabetes (6.5 years for vital status). We studied the effects of valsartan on the occurrence of three coprimary outcomes: the development of diabetes; an extended composite outcome of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, arterial revascularization, or hospitalization for unstable angina; and a core composite outcome that excluded unstable angina and revascularization.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence of diabetes was 33.1% in the valsartan group, as compared with 36.8% in the placebo group (hazard ratio in the valsartan group, 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 0.92; P<0.001). Valsartan, as compared with placebo, did not significantly reduce the incidence of either the extended cardiovascular outcome (14.5% vs. 14.8%; hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.07; P=0.43) or the core cardiovascular outcome (8.1% vs. 8.1%; hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.14; P=0.85).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with impaired glucose tolerance and cardiovascular disease or risk factors, the use of valsartan for 5 years, along with lifestyle modification, led to a relative reduction of 14% in the incidence of diabetes but did not reduce the rate of cardiovascular events. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00097786.)

Effect of nateglinide on the incidence of diabetes and cardiovascular events

BACKGROUND

The ability of short-acting insulin secretagogues to reduce the risk of diabetes or cardiovascular events in people with impaired glucose tolerance is unknown.

METHODS

In a double-blind, randomized clinical trial, we assigned 9306 participants with impaired glucose tolerance and either cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular risk factors to receive nateglinide (up to 60 mg three times daily) or placebo, in a 2-by-2 factorial design with valsartan or placebo, in addition to participation in a lifestyle modification program. We followed the participants for a median of 5.0 years for incident diabetes (and a median of 6.5 years for vital status). We evaluated the effect of nateglinide on the occurrence of three coprimary outcomes: the development of diabetes; a core cardiovascular outcome that was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure; and an extended cardiovascular outcome that was a composite of the individual components of the core composite cardiovascular outcome, hospitalization for unstable angina, or arterial revascularization.

RESULTS

After adjustment for multiple testing, nateglinide, as compared with placebo, did not significantly reduce the cumulative incidence of diabetes (36% and 34%, respectively; hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00 to 1.15; P=0.05), the core composite cardiovascular outcome (7.9% and 8.3%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.94, 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.09; P=0.43), or the extended composite cardiovascular outcome (14.2% and 15.2%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.93, 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.03; P=0.16). Nateglinide did, however, increase the risk of hypoglycemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Among persons with impaired glucose tolerance and established cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular risk factors, assignment to nateglinide for 5 years did not reduce the incidence of diabetes or the coprimary composite cardiovascular outcomes. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00097786.)

[NAVIGATOR: A trial of prevention of cardiovascular complications and type 2 diabetes with valsartan and/or nateglinide]

NAVIGATOR ("Nateglinide And Valsartan in Impaired Glucose Tolerance Outcomes Research") is a large international placebo-controlled trial that randomised 9,031 individuals at high risk because of impaired glucose tolerance and established cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular risk factors. This trial aimed at investigating whether valsartan (a selective AT1 receptor antagonist) and/or nateglinide (a short-acting insulin-secreting agent) are able to reduce the incidence of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular events. After a median follow up of 6.5 years, neither valsartan nor nateglinide improved cardiovascular prognosis in the tested population, which already benefited from a protective pharmacotherapy at baseline and a reinforcement of lifestyle modification throughout the trial. Nateglinide did not diminish the risk of new onset diabetes. In contrast, valsartan reduced the incidence of type 2 diabetes by 14%, confirming the potential interest of the blockade of the renin-angiotensin system in this high-risk population.

Clinical outcome in resistant HIV-2 infection treated with raltegravir and maraviroc

Therapy for infection with HIV-2 remains limited. We report an HIV-2-infected patient in whom genotyping demonstrated PI, NRTI and NNRTI resistance, with a subsequent response to raltegravir- and maraviroc-based therapy. Further studies are required to assess the clinical efficacy of maraviroc in HIV-2 infection.

[The newest developments in anti-HIV-1 drugs]

In the two decades since AZT was first approved for clinical use in 1987, 24 additional antiretroviral agents have been approved. They include 7 nucleoside analogs, a nucleotide analog and 4 non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, 10 protease inhibitors, 2 entry inhibitors and an integrase inhibitor. More than 20 investigational agents are currently being studied in clinical trials. Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), which involves a combination of anti-HIV-1 drugs, is extremely effective in suppressing HIV-1 replication and increasing CD4+ number and results in substantial reductions in HIV-1-related morbidity and mortality. In last 20 years, much has been learned about resistance to antiretroviral drugs, drug interactions and metabolic complications of antiviral drug use. Drugs are now selected on the basis of resistance tests and on the risk of specific drug complications in individual patients. As a result, decisions about the therapy of HIV/AIDS have become personalized and are made on a patient-by-patient basis. With appropriate medical management, a person with HIV-1 now has the possibility of a nearly normal life expectancy.

HIV entry inhibitors: progress in development and application

This review discusses recent progress in the development of anti-HIV agents, with emphasis on small molecule HIV-1 entry inhibitors. The entry inhibitors primarily target HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins or the cellular receptors, CD4 and chemokine receptors. Two of the entry inhibitors, enfuvirtide and maraviroc, have been approved by the US FDA for AIDS therapy. The drug resistance associated with some of the entry inhibitors will also be discussed.

Insulinotropic actions of nateglinide in type 2 diabetic patients and effects on dipeptidyl peptidase-IV activity and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide degradation

BACKGROUND

Nateglinide restores early-phase insulin secretion to feeding and reduces postprandial hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes. This study evaluated the effects of nateglinide on dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-IV) activity and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) degradation. Research design and methods Blood samples were collected from type 2 diabetic subjects (n=10, fasting glucose 9.36+/-1.2 mmol/l) following administration of oral nateglinide (120 mg) 10 min prior to a 75 g oral glucose load in a randomised crossover design.

RESULTS

Plasma glucose reached 18.2+/-1.7 and 16.7+/-1.7 mmol/l at 90 min in control and placebo groups (P<0.001). These effects were accompanied by prompt 32% inhibition of DPP-IV activity after 10 min (19.9+/-1.6 nmol/ml per min, P<0.05), reaching a minimum of 1.9+/-0.1 nmol/ml per min at 120 min (P<0.001) after nateglinide. Insulin and C-peptide levels increased significantly compared with placebo, to peak after 90 min at 637.6+/-163.9 pmol/l (P<0.05) and 11.8+/-1.4 mg/l (P<0.01) respectively. DPP-IV-mediated degradation of GIP was significantly less in patients receiving nateglinide compared with placebo. Inhibition of DPP-IV activity corresponded with a time- and concentration-dependent inhibitory effect of nateglinide on DPP-IV-mediated truncation of GIP(1-42) to GIP(3-42) in vitro. Comparison of in vitro inhibition of DPP-IV by nateglinide and vildagliptin revealed IC(50) values of 17.1 and 2.1 microM respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although considerably less potent than specified DPP-IV inhibitors, the possibility that some of the beneficial actions of nateglinide are indirectly mediated through DPP-IV inhibition and increased bioavailability of GIP and other incretins merits consideration.

[Immunorecovery after prolonged HIV-related immunosuppression: opportunities of the new antiretroviral classes]

Treatment of multi-drug experienced patients is an important concern in the management of HIV-1 disease, partially solved by the availability of new drugs acting at different phases of viral replication. Immune recovery during cART is linked both to the activity of antiviral drugs, as well as to the regenerative capability of thymus and bone marrow. We report a patient with a 22-year-old HIV-1 disease and an AIDS diagnosis for 15 years, with extensive resistance to all antiretroviral drugs, who never had treatment interruption, except for short spells due to adverse effects. This decision was supported by both findings elsewhere that interruptions of cART in experienced patients with advanced disease are strongly associated with more rapid disease progression and by our evaluation of his bone marrow activity. The colony-forming cells assay performed in the patient showed residual clonogenic capability, increased in vitro by addition of protease inhibitors and IL-2. A new therapeutic scheme including darunavir and maraviroc allowed dramatic changes leading both to a quick reduction in plasmatic viral load with an impressive immune reconstitution and an improvement in clinical conditions.

[A comparison of efficacy and tolerance of nateglinide and acarbose monotherapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus]

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of nateglinide with those of acarbose in Chinese type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients.

METHODS

This multi-center, randomized, double-blind, parallel-arm study compared the efficacy and tolerability of nateglinide (120 mg, 3/d, n = 119) and those of acarbose (100 mg, 3/d, n = 118) during a 12-week treatment in T2DM patients uncontrolled by diet with glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) 6.5% - 11.0%.

RESULTS

Monotherapy with nateglinide (120 mg, 3/d) or acarbose (100 mg, 3/d) decreased HbA1c to a similar extent during 12-week treatment. The mean change from baseline to end-point in HbA1c was (-0.90 +/- 0.98)% and (-0.83 +/- 0.81)% in patients receiving nateglinide and acarbose, respectively, with no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). The decrease in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was similar between nateglinide and acarbose (P > 0.05). The mean change in 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose (PG2h) was (-1.45 +/- 2.74) mmol/L and (-2.20 +/- 2.21) mmol/L in patients receiving nateglinide and acarbose (P = 0.0017). Body weight was significantly decreased in both groups at the end-point (P < 0.05), although the decrease was more with acarbose than nateglinide [(-0.66 +/- 1.79) kg vs (-2.06 +/- 2.00) kg, P = 0.0000]. And the proportion of patients experiencing any presumed drug related adverse events was not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Nateglinide (120 mg, 3/d) is effective and well tolerated in T2DM patients uncontrolled by diet, demonstrating similar HbA1c reductions as compared with acarbose (100 mg, 3/d).

Inhibitors of viral entry

The entry of viruses into target cells involves a complex series of sequential steps, with opportunities for inhibition at every stage. Entry inhibitors exert their biological properties by inhibiting protein-protein interactions either within the viral envelope (Env) glycoproteins or between viral Env and host-cell receptors. The nature of resistance to entry inhibitors also differs from compounds inhibiting enzymatic targets due to their different modes of action and the relative variability in Env sequences both temporally and between patients. Two drugs that target HIV-1 entry, enfuvirtide and maraviroc, are now licensed for treatment of HIV-1 infection. The efficacy of these drugs validates entry as a point of intervention in viral life cycles and, in the context of HIV treatment, contributes to the growing armamentarium of antivirals which, in multidrug combinations, can effectively inhibit viral replication and prevent disease progression.

Testing intra-hemocelic injection of antimicrobials against Encephalitozoon sp. (Microsporidia) in an insect host

Encephalitozoon spp. are the primary microsporidial pathogens of humans and domesticated animals. In this experiment, we test the efficacy of four commercial antimicrobials against an Encephalitozoon sp. in an insect host by intra-hemocelic injection. All four antimicrobials, viz., thiabendazole, quinine, albendazole, and fumagillin, significantly reduced but did not eliminate microsporidia spore counts in the grasshopper host. Among these four drugs, thiabendazole was most effective in reducing the microsporidia spore level up to 90%, followed by quinine (70%), albendazole (62%), and fumagillin (59%). No control or quinine-treated animals died, whereas 45% of albendazole animals died. Despite the high mortality induced by albendazole, this drug significantly reduced spore counts, a result not seen in previous per os trials. Among the treatment groups, grasshoppers injected with thiabendazole lost a significant mass. Our study suggests that quinine and related alkaloids should be further examined for antimicrosporidial activity.

Subgroup analyses of maraviroc in previously treated R5 HIV-1 infection

BACKGROUND

We conducted subanalyses of the combined results of the Maraviroc versus Optimized Therapy in Viremic Antiretroviral Treatment-Experienced Patients (MOTIVATE) 1 and MOTIVATE 2 studies to better characterize the efficacy and safety of maraviroc in key subgroups of patients.

METHODS

We analyzed pooled data from week 48 from the two studies according to sex, race or ethnic group, clade, CC chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) delta32 genotype, viral load at the time of screening, the use or nonuse of enfuvirtide in optimized background therapy (OBT), the baseline CD4 cell count, the number of active antiretroviral drugs coadministered, the first use of selected background agents, and tropism at baseline. Changes in viral tropism and the CD4 count at treatment failure were evaluated. Data on aminotransferase levels in patients coinfected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) were also analyzed.

RESULTS

A treatment benefit of maraviroc plus OBT over placebo plus OBT was shown in all subgroups, including patients with a low CD4 cell count at baseline, those with a high viral load at screening, and those who had not received active agents in OBT. Analyses of the virologic response according to the first use of selected background drugs showed the additional benefit of adding a potent new drug to maraviroc at the initiation of maraviroc therapy. More patients in whom maraviroc failed had a virus binding to the CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) at failure, but there was no evidence of a decrease in the CD4 cell count at failure in such patients as compared with those in whom placebo failed. Subanalyses involving patients coinfected with HBV or HCV revealed no evidence of excess hepatotoxic effects as compared with baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Subanalyses of pooled data from week 48 indicate that maraviroc provides a valuable treatment option for a wide spectrum of patients with R5 HIV-1 infection who have been treated previously. (ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00098306 and NCT00098722.)

Maraviroc for previously treated patients with R5 HIV-1 infection

BACKGROUND

CC chemokine receptor 5 antagonists are a new class of antiretroviral agents.

METHODS

We conducted two double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies--Maraviroc versus Optimized Therapy in Viremic Antiretroviral Treatment-Experienced Patients (MOTIVATE) 1 and MOTIVATE 2--with patients who had R5 human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) only. They had been treated with or had resistance to three antiretroviral-drug classes and had HIV-1 RNA levels of more than 5000 copies per milliliter. The patients were randomly assigned to one of three antiretroviral regimens consisting of maraviroc once daily, maraviroc twice daily, or placebo, each of which included optimized background therapy (OBT) based on treatment history and drug-resistance testing. Safety and efficacy were assessed after 48 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 1049 patients received the randomly assigned study drug; the mean baseline HIV-1 RNA level was 72,400 copies per milliliter, and the median CD4 cell count was 169 per cubic millimeter. At 48 weeks, in both studies, the mean change in HIV-1 RNA from baseline was greater with maraviroc than with placebo: -1.66 and -1.82 log(10) copies per milliliter with the once-daily and twice-daily regimens, respectively, versus -0.80 with placebo in MOTIVATE 1, and -1.72 and -1.87 log(10) copies per milliliter, respectively, versus -0.76 with placebo in MOTIVATE 2. More patients receiving maraviroc once or twice daily had HIV-1 RNA levels of less than 50 copies per milliliter (42% and 47%, respectively, vs. 16% in the placebo group in MOTIVATE 1; 45% in both maraviroc groups vs. 18% in MOTIVATE 2; P<0.001 for both comparisons in each study). The change from baseline in CD4 counts was also greater with maraviroc once or twice daily than with placebo (increases of 113 and 122 per cubic millimeter, respectively, vs. 54 in MOTIVATE 1; increases of 122 and 128 per cubic millimeter, respectively, vs. 69 in MOTIVATE 2; P<0.001 for both comparisons in each study). Frequencies of adverse events were similar among the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Maraviroc, as compared with placebo, resulted in significantly greater suppression of HIV-1 and greater increases in CD4 cell counts at 48 weeks in previously treated patients with R5 HIV-1 who were receiving OBT. (ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00098306 and NCT00098722.)