Impact of Cognitive Function Change on Mortality in Renal Transplant and End-Stage Renal Disease Patients

BACKGROUND

Limited evidence from small-scale studies, mainly involving end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, suggests that kidney transplantation may improve cognitive function. We examined changes in cognitive function after a kidney transplant and its association with survival in advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD)/ESRD patients.

METHODS

In a prospective study design, cognitive performance of 90 patients (50.6 ± 13.1 years, 66.7% men, 27.8% blacks, 76% CKD stages 4-5) was assessed at the respective patients' residences using established neurocognitive tests.

RESULTS

Among the 90 patients, 44 received a kidney transplant (KTx group) while 46 did not (no-KTx group). After a mean follow-up of ∼19 months, there was no significant change in scores for majority of cognitive tests in either group. Older age, but not diabetes or renal function status (CKD vs. ESRD), was a determinant of poor follow-up cognitive performance. Additionally, poor attention/psychomotor speed and executive performance (as measured by Trails A and Stroop test, respectively) was associated with higher mortality over a mean follow-up of 4.7 years, even after adjustment for age, sex, diabetes, CKD or ESRD status and kidney transplant status.

CONCLUSION

Overall, cognitive function does not significantly improve after kidney transplant or significantly decline in non-transplanted, advanced CKD/ESRD patients. Poor attention, psychomotor speed and executive performance independent of transplant status were associated with higher mortality over time.

Adjustment Experience of Kidney Transplantation Recipients in Korea

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to understand the adjustment process after kidney transplantation.

METHODS

The research method followed grounded theory methodology of Strauss and Corbin. Twelve recipients after kidney transplantation were selected. The data were collected through in-depth, face-to-face interviews or e-mailing or phone-interviews and analyzed by means of a constant comparative method.

RESULTS

Through the category analysis, "struggling for independence" was verified as the central phenomenon of recipients, and the causal conditions that influence this phenomenon were "unpredictable physical status," "the difficulty of self-care," "apathy of families and friends," and "emotional instability." The contextual conditions were "social prejudice" and "difficulty in returning to society," and the intervening conditions were "significant others support" and "religious support." The action/interaction strategies were "inner reviewing strategies," "interactive strategies," and "active self-maintaining strategies." From this observation, "establishing guidelines for living" was derived as the result.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study provided deep understanding on the adjustment process after kidney transplantation, and this would help to provide a frame for individualized medical and nursing intervention strategies in assisting the psychosocial adaptation of the kidney transplantation recipient.

Teaching Patients about Kidney Transplantation: Documentation

Increasing demands are being placed on transplant nurse coordinators for more precise documentation of their teaching of kidney transplant patients, but the amount of time nurses have for this added documentation remains unchanged or has diminished. After a thorough review of the literature, our transplant team found no patient teaching documentation format that assisted us in overcoming the problem of increased demands. Consequently, following the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organization standards, we developed a Renal Transplant Patient Teaching Record that has assisted our team in documenting the pre- and post-transplant patient teaching that we complete.

Living Kidney Donor Decision Making: State of the Science and Directions for Future Research

Background

The Federal government and transplantation organizations have called for further study of living donation at a time when 3 new living donor protocols are being introduced throughout the United States that promise to significantly increase the donor pool and change the face of living donation. Donation to a once incompatible and sometimes unknown recipient may now occur through the use of plasmapheresis therapy or paired and nondirected living donor protocols.

Objective

To describe the state of the science on living kidney donor decision making, and to provide recommendations for future research to guide donor education and care.

Data Sources

Automated literature search using PubMed and CINAHL scientific literature databases.

Study Data Extraction

Research papers on living donor decision making from 1997 to 2003. Studies available only as abstracts were excluded. Data Synthesis Studies of living kidney donor decision making and outcomes have been limited in scope, with small sample sizes and inconsistent reports of racial and ethnic characteristics of the sample. The retrospective nature of the majority of living donor studies is a significant limitation.

Conclusions

Future prospective studies that are diverse by sex, race, and ethnicity will contribute to our knowledge of factors that influence the decision to be a living kidney donor.

One Organ Donation, Three Perspectives: Experiences of Donors, Recipients, and Third Parties with Living Kidney Donation

Although living kidney donors' experiences with donation have been studied, questions of potential bias in retrospective donor reports remain. This study examined the experience of living kidney donation from 3 perspectives: those of the donor, the recipient, and a third party involved with the donation (ie, a donor triad). Surveys were completed with 174 donor triads to examine triad members' perceptions of donors' concerns before transplantation, whether these concerns came true after transplantation, the donors' experiences with surgery and recovery, and whether they would make the same decision again today. Triad members all agreed that donors were highly satisfied with their donation experience and that the relationship between recipient and donor improved after transplantation. Although recipients and third parties correctly identified the donors' primary concerns, they underestimated the prevalence of 16 of 18 donor concerns, including the donors' willingness to make the same decision again. Recipients also overestimated how painful and difficult the surgery and recovery were for donors. The results suggest that retrospective studies of donors may not be marred by significant misreporting or memory biases and that better education about the donation experience for the entire donor triad might provide better social support for donors, reduce recipients' guilt about donors' pain, and increase donation rates overall.

A Comparative Study of Quality of Life among the Age Groups of Kidney Transplant Recipients

Context

Quality of life and transplant age are 2 major concerns of professionals and researchers. Both variables are contemplated in transplant allocation decisions as a result of longer graft and patient survival and the likelihood of achieving a reasonably good quality of life for patients of all ages. Studies are warranted to understand if quality of life might serve as a moderating variable to balance question of age and transplant allocations.

Objective

To determine if there are differences in the pretransplant and posttransplant quality of life of kidney transplant recipients with respect to age.

Design, Participants, Setting, and Outcome Measures

This study comparatively examined the differences in pretransplant and posttransplant quality of life of kidney transplant recipients in 5 age groups (18–29 years, 30–39, 40–49, 50–59, and older than 60). A sample of 293 patients admitted to a midsouthern US transplant center and selected on a convenience-sampling basis were included in the study. Multiple measures of quality of life were used, including the Quality of Life Index, the Adult Self-Image Scale, and the Sickness Impact Profile.

Results

Both the pretransplant and posttransplant quality of life of all age groups of kidney transplant recipients were similar, with the exception that the recipients in the age range of 30 to 49 years reported better posttransplant quality of life on the Sickness Impact Profile Psychosocial measure (F = 2.18, P = .02).

Conclusions

Quality of life outcomes do not appear to favor one age group over another, although psychosocial outcomes may warrant some additional consideration.

Exploring Donors' and Recipients' Attitudes about Living Donor Kidney Transplantation

Context

There is a growing interest in living donor kidney transplantation because of its potential to reduce the current kidney shortage.

Objective

To explore the experience of potential recipients, recipients, potential donors, and donors with regard to living donor kidney transplantation and laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy.

Method

Twenty-five patients participated in a series of focus group interviews. The interviews were tape-recorded and a content analysis was performed.

Results

All participants had a positive attitude toward living donor kidney transplantation and laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy, though this procedure was not a factor that influenced potential donors' decision to donate a kidney. None of the potential donors and donors felt coerced into giving a kidney; they were motivated by a desire to help a loved one who was suffering. The main perceived impediment to donate a kidney was the potential recipients' reluctance to accept the offer. Potential recipients and recipients found it difficult to ask for a kidney and worried about the consequences of a kidney removal on their donor's health. A potential barrier to living donor kidney transplantation was that recipients would never have accepted a kidney if their donor had to pay for the kidney removal. In addition, recipients believed that a kidney from a non–blood-related donor was not as a good a match as a kidney from a blood-related donor.

Conclusion

This exploratory study reveals that donors, potential donors, recipients, and potential recipients had an overall positive attitude toward living donor kidney transplantation and laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. This study also sheds light on a number of barriers that have not been previously reported.

Evaluation of an Immunosuppressant Side Effect Instrument

Background

Clinicians continue to be compelled to evaluate the impact of immunosuppressive medication side effects on the quality of life of transplant recipients. We were asked to develop an instrument to measure side effects in immunosuppressed transplant recipients.

Objective

To construct an instrument that measures the impact and severity of side effects of immunosuppressive medications used in transplantation and to assess the reliability and validity of the newly developed instrument called the Memphis Survey.

Design

The instrument was constructed by a panel of physicians, nurses, and pharmacists with experience in treating transplant recipients. A small group of kidney transplant recipients (n=13) provided pilot data for refining and testing the instrument. A national sample of kidney, liver, and heart transplant recipients (n=505) provided data that were used to further develop the instrument.

Analysis

Factor analysis was used to determine the psychological dimensions underlying the instrument and to guide the construction of scales from the survey items. The instrument scales were then computed from the dataset of 505 transplant recipients to quantify the impact of immunosuppressant side effects on the quality of life of transplant recipients.

Results and Conclusion

Analyses showed the final instrument scales to be valid and reliable. Exploratory analysis suggests the need for further testing of the instrument to determine gender differences.

Social Network Mapping with Transplant Recipients

Social support can have great influence on health, well-being, and general quality of life To promote awareness of the social network that surrounds each transplant recipient, transplant social workers are now using the Social Network Map as an intervention. Because perceptions of availability and accessibility of support are key elements in the use of social network resources, awakening an individual's awareness of available resources is a significant first step in enhancing social support and, ultimately, quality of life. The Social Network Map is used to establish dialogue regarding individuals' needs and sources of support, and then how the support system can meet those needs. Transplant social workers thus foster active use of those people in transplant recipients' networks who can meet the particular needs recipients identify.

Potential Living Kidney Donors' Health Education Use and Comfort with Donation

Context

Much living kidney donation research focuses on actual donors rather than all donors who are evaluated by the transplant center.

Objective

To determine (1) what concerns and benefits potential donors saw possible from donation, (2) how they educated themselves before contacting the transplant center, and (3) who were the most comfortable donors.

Design

A telephone survey of 91 potential donors before transplant evaluation.

Setting

Barnes-Jewish Hospital Transplant Center in St Louis, Mo.

Main Outcome Measures

Willingness and comfort donating, key concerns and perceived benefits to donation, hours of transplant-related education.

Results

On a 7-point scale, potential donors were very willing (mean=6.65, SD=0.95) and comfortable (mean=6.31, SD=1.12) donating. They were most concerned that their recipients would die if they could not donate, the evaluation and surgery would be anxiety provoking or painful, and they did not understand what donation would require. Donors previously spent an average of 6 hours reading health resources and 32 hours discussing donation. Using logistic regression, those donors with 0 to 4 concerns (odds ratio=7.1, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2–23.16), more than 5 benefits (odds ratio=3.7, 95% CI, 1.2–11.0), and who were family members (odds ratio=4.7, 95% CI, 1.4–15.8) were more likely to be extremely comfortable donating compared to others.

Conclusions

Before evaluation, most potential donors are willing to donate because they think that it is important to improve the health of a loved one. Their knowledge of donation varies and they need clear information about medical testing and support coping with any negative donation outcomes.

Life Satisfaction among Kidney Transplant Recipients: Demographic and Biological Factors

Purpose

The Transplant Learning Center is a program providing education and support for solid-organ transplant recipients taking cyclosporine (Neoral or Sandimmune). One goal of the program is to improve patients' quality of life, which may be influenced by demographic and biological factors, and in turn influences adherence to prescribed medication regimens. We analyzed the results from the initial survey of enrollees to better understand life satisfaction and to test the validity and reliability of the satisfaction scale used in the program.

Method

Patients enter the program through self-selection: all enrollees who received a kidney transplant were included in this analysis. Satisfaction was measured using the Life Satisfaction Index, which includes 8 questions about aspects of satisfaction with the patient's life. Associations between the Life Satisfaction Index and demographic factors, comorbid medical conditions, adverse effects of immunosuppressants, and medication compliance were examined.

Results

All 3676 kidney transplant recipients who completed the initial survey were included. Mean satisfaction scores were highest in persons who were older than 64 years, men, and those who were married. Satsifaction scores were positively correlated with education and income. Mean satisfaction score was significantly lower among persons with medical comorbidities, persons who reported that adverse effects of medications were more frequent, and persons who reported noncompliance with their medication regimen.

Conclusion

The Life Satisfaction Index is a transplant-specific measure of health-related quality of life that can be used to help detect areas of potential concern in the clinical management of kidney transplant recipients.

A Center-Based Approach to a Transplant Employment Program

The return to work after transplantation has been actively discussed in the transplant community for years. However, despite the desire for transplant practitioners to have recipients return to being healthy, contributing members of society as well as return to work, practitioners often passively support the sick role. We discovered that patients who are returning to work after transplantation may have been out of the work force for several years, and require assistance that we as healthcare providers were unable or untrained to provide. An employment specialist was added to the transplant staff and became a vital part of our attempts to create a proactive employment atmosphere and enhance our patients' quality of life. Adding an advocate for employment in our center has also facilitated the shift in our thinking and approach to care from the sick role to one of rehabilitation and from reactive to proactive. This change in attitude has assisted in empowering our recipients to feel as if they can truly resume a normal life.

Reproductive and Contraceptive Characteristics of Premenopausal Kidney Transplant Recipients

Objective

To obtain information on menstrual patterns before and after transplantation, desire for future pregnancy, and use of contraception among premenopausal kidney transplant recipients.

Study Design

This observational study collected information using self-administered anonymous questionnaires during a routine outpatient clinic visit.

Results

Of the 107 women who completed the questionnaire, 41 identified themselves as being premenopausal. Among the 41 premenopausal women, approximately half of the women reported their current menstrual patterns as normal and 26% were not using any form of contraception. Overall, 10 women (24%) reported a desire to become pregnant and 4 women (10%) had a successful pregnancy after transplantation. Most of the women who desired a future pregnancy (8/10) were receiving an immunosuppressive regimen that included mycophenolate mofetil.

Conclusion

Kidney transplantation in the current era is associated with a return of normal menstrual function in the majority of female transplant recipients. A substantial fraction of women desire pregnancy after transplantation and many are using an immunosuppressive drug with limited safety data on use during pregnancy. More caution should be used with the use of newer immunosuppressive agents in sexually active premenopausal transplant recipients until more safety data are available.

Loss of the Imagined Past: An Emotional Obstacle to Medical Compliance in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Among kidney transplant recipients, the concepts of grief and bereavement have been considered in terms of graft rejection, side effects of drugs, or death of the donor. However, our research suggests that even after a successful kidney transplantation, patients may present with feelings of bereavement, grief, or low mood, which may appear paradoxical because they have just received a much desired transplant. This sense of bereavement should be considered in terms of an imagined past, which may help to understand the patient's current mood changes and medical noncompliance. In the case report presented here, we have used the concept of systemic integrative psychotherapy to analyze change in a patient's life. Based on our research, we suggest that feelings of bereavement and grief are generated as patients come to terms with their past, which has been irretrievably lost to chronic illness, and contemplate their future. Feelings of grief and bereavement in the posttransplant period may be due to the loss of an imagined past, and must be differentiated from the bereavement the patient feels for the donor and the donor family. These feeling of loss, if not resolved, may lead to social isolation and medical noncompliance.

Ethical Aspects of Living Donor Kidney Transplantation and Recipient Adherence to Treatment

Living donor kidney transplantation comprises approximately 30% of kidney transplantations in the United States and is an effective form of renal replacement therapy, with low risk to the donor. Twenty percent of living donors do not have a genetic relationship with their recipients. In the selection of living donors, guiding ethical principles include altruism, the absence of coercion or monetary reward, patient autonomy, beneficence, and nonmaleficence. In order for the benefit of living donor kidney transplantation to outweigh the risk, evidence that the proposed recipient will care for the transplanted organ must exist. Nonadherence to treatment has been identified as a major risk factor for graft rejection. When nonadherence to treatment regimens leads to loss of the graft, the consequences are felt by the recipient, donor, and the treatment team. The decision to transplant an organ to a noncompliant patient from a cadaveric or a living donor raises issues of patient autonomy, justice, paternalism, and benevolence versus nonmaleficence.

"We're not going to say it's suffering; we're going to say it's an experience": The lived experience of maternal caregivers in pediatric kidney transplantation

Advances in the surgical and immunological aspects of pediatric kidney transplantation have resulted in significant improvements in long-term outcome and survival rates. However, there continues to be a negative impact reported on overall family functioning despite the reported good health and quality of life for the transplanted child. This research utilizes a phenomenological approach to examine the lived experiences of seven mothers of children who had undergone kidney transplantation. Findings of the study illuminate that the experience of mothering in the context of pediatric kidney transplantation is reflected in (1) the significance of relationships to the experience of self; (2) the lived experience of time; and (3) opportunities for growth and personal development. This research identifies that, while maternal caregiving in this context is fraught with challenges, there are opportunities for the development of skills and personal growth within the experience. By embracing a strength-based perspective, social work is well positioned to offer support for maternal meaning-making and adjustment during times of stress and uncertainty.

Past Cardiovascular Episodes Deteriorate Quality of Life of Patients With Type 1 Diabetes and End-stage Kidney Disease After Kidney or Simultaneous Pancreas and Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

The beneficial influence of kidney (KTx) or simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK) on quality of life (QOL) in patients with end-stage kidney disease caused by type 1 diabetes mellitus was confirmed in many studies. The aim of this study was to identify factors that influence QOL of patients in long-term follow-up after SPK or KTx.

METHODS

Twenty-seven SPK and 26 KTx patients with good function of transplanted organs at least 1 year after transplantation were enrolled into the analysis. To estimate QOL of the recipients the Kidney Disease and Quality of Life Short Form was applied.

RESULTS

Within the whole analyzed group, the necessity of exogenous insulin administration correlated (P < .05) with symptom/problem list (γ = -0.35), effects of kidney disease (-0.38), cognitive function (-0.47), sleep (-0.42), overall health (-0.47), physical functioning (-0.61), role-physical (-0.32), pain (-0.50), general health (-0.32), emotional well-being (-0.31), role-emotional (-0.36), social function (-0.33), energy/fatigue (-0.44), and the SF-12 physical composite (-0.44). History of cardiovascular episode correlated (P < .05) with symptom/problem list (γ = -0.59), effects of kidney disease (-0.46), burden of kidney disease (-0.56), sleep (-0.54), social support (-0.51), physical functioning (-0.55), role-physical (-0.70), pain (-0.60), general health (-0.57), emotional well-being (-0.45), role-emotional (-0.95), social function (-0.58), energy/fatigue (-0.59), SF-12 physical composite (-0.45), and SF-12 mental composite (-0.83).

CONCLUSIONS

Exogenous insulin administration and history of cardiovascular episode are the most important factors influencing QOL in patients after SPK or KTx, particularly worsening its physical components.

A delicate balance: negotiating renal transplantation, immunosuppression and adherence to medical regimen

Despite the volume of biomedical and psychosocial discourse surrounding both renal transplantation and the immune system, there is a limit to current understandings of immunosuppression in the context of kidney transplantation. For example, we do not know how the immunosuppressed renal transplant recipient experiences and understands their immune system and body. In addition, we do not know if the patient is as fixated on `graft survival' as their healthcare team or whether other concerns are more relevant. What is missing is the discourse of those who actually `live' the medically altered immune system in the context of renal transplantation.

We propose that this gap in knowledge is bound to an acknowledged problem among renal transplant recipients and their healthcare teams — a lack of compliance with recommended medical regimens. Our argument here is that an exploration of patient intimacy with transplant-related immunosuppression might illuminate a different understanding of this experience that could enhance health professionals' understanding and their subsequent approach to treatment. We contend that the embodied and contextual experience of the patient needs to be equally valued in order to enhance patient outcomes.

Stress, coping and adherence to immunosuppressive medications in kidney transplantation: a comparative study

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE

: Adherence to medication is a key issue relating to outcomes from transplantation and it is influenced by several factors, such as stress and coping strategies. However, these factors have been poorly explored. We aimed to compare stress and coping strategies between adherent and nonadherent renal transplant recipients who were receiving immunosuppression.

DESIGN AND SETTING

: We conducted a comparative, cross-sectional and observational study at a university-based transplantation clinic in Juiz de Fora, Brazil.

METHODS

:Fifty patients were recruited and classified as adherent or nonadherent following administration of the Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medications Scale. Stress was evaluated using the Lipp Stress Symptom Inventory for Adults and coping strategies were assessed using the Ways of Coping Scale.

RESULTS

: The study included 25 nonadherent patients and 25 controls with a mean age of 44.1 ± 12.8 years and median post-transplantation time of 71.8 months. Stress was present in 50% of the patients. Through simple logistic regression, nonadherence was correlated with palliative coping (OR 3.4; CI: 1.02-11.47; P < 0.05) and had a marginal trend toward significance with more advanced phases of stress (OR 4.7; CI: 0.99-22.51; P = 0.053).

CONCLUSION

:Stress and coping strategies may have implications for understanding and managing nonadherent behavior among transplantation patients and should be considered among the strategies for reducing nonadherence.

Kidney and Liver Living Donors: A Comparison of Experiences

Background

Living donor kidney transplantation is considered a safe and effective means to treat end-stage renal disease, and has now exceeded the number of deceased donor kidney transplantations performed annually. Living donor liver transplantation is more controversial and has received criticism in the medical and lay community. Studies focus on recipient outcomes and medical safety. The impact of the donation on donors is not well understood.

Objective

To compare experiences from both kidney and liver living donors, including their motivation, perceived risks, and postoperative experience.

Methods

Questionnaires about the donation experience were mailed to 70 patients who underwent laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and 85 patients who underwent hepatectomy at a large academic medical center. Results of kidney and liver donors were compared.

Results

No differences were found in mean age, marital status, ethnicity, relationship to the recipient, and employment status of the 2 groups. Women were more prevalent in both groups. The most common motivating factor in both kidney and liver donors was “because it was family,” 81% and 82%, respectively. Kidney donors describe the decision to donate as easy compared to the liver donors ( P=.049). In neither group did donors feel pressure to donate or have family conflicts regarding their decision to donate. Both groups felt they were well informed of the risks. Neither group described unexpected problems, and neither group regretted their decision to donate and would do it again if asked.

Conclusion

Donors in both groups reported favorable outcomes. A greater concern for risk of death, bleeding, altered appearance, and infection existed among liver donors compared to kidney donors. The actual outcomes were better than the perceived risks.

Living Donation Decision Making: Recipients' Concerns and Educational Needs

Context

Despite the advantages of living donor transplantation, evidence suggests that some potential recipients with living donors have psychological concerns that prevent them from pursuing living donation. Addressing these concerns through education may increase the rates of living donation.

Objective

To understand the psychological barriers and educational needs of potential kidney recipients regarding living donation.

Subjects and Design

Qualitative focus group study of kidney transplant recipients, donors, and family members to explore their assessment of the advantages of dialysis and deceased donor transplantation over living donation, their concerns about living donation, and what types of living donation education would be most helpful.

Results

Kidney recipients reported that they might not pursue living donation because they felt guilty and indebted to the donor, did not want to harm or inconvenience the donor, did not want to accept a kidney that a family member might need later, and did not want to disappoint the donor if the kidney failed. Recipients were generally unaware that donors could personally benefit from donating and would rather wait for donor volunteers than ask anyone directly. Both donors and recipients thought that training on how to make the donation request and education about living donors' motivations for donation and transplant experience could help more renal patients pursue living donation.

Culturally Responsive Interventions to Enhance Immunosuppressive Medication Adherence in Older African American Kidney Transplant Recipients

Context

Immunosuppressive medication nonadherence is variable among older kidney transplant recipients and is a problem in African American recipients despite the severe consequences of this behavior. Many factors place older African American recipients at risk for medication nonadherence.

Objective

To provide an overview of interventions to enhance immunosuppressive medication adherence in older African American kidney transplant recipients using a culturally responsive model. Culturally sensitive, innovative, and transformation interventions are discussed. Situations when each intervention would be most and least appropriate are described.

Conclusion

Moving culturally appropriate interventions forward into practice and testing their effectiveness in improving adherence outcomes in vulnerable, older African American kidney transplant recipients is a worthy practice and research goal for transplant nursing.

Why take the chance? A qualitative grounded theory study of nocturnal haemodialysis recipients who decline kidney transplantation

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to examine the factors that influence decision-making to forgo transplantation in favour of remaining on nocturnal haemodialysis (NHD).

DESIGN

A grounded theory approach using in-depth telephone interviewing was used.

SETTING

Participants were identified from 2 tertiary care renal programmes in Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

The study participants were otherwise eligible patients with end-stage renal disease who have opted to remain off of the transplant list. A total of 7 eligible participants were interviewed. 5 were male. The mean age was 46 years.

ANALYSIS

A constant comparative method of analysis was used to identify a core category and factors influencing the decision-making process.

RESULTS

In this grounded theory study of people receiving NHD who refused kidney transplantation, the core category of 'why take a chance when things are going well?' was identified, along with 4 factors that influenced the decision including 'negative past experience', 'feeling well on NHD', 'gaining autonomy' and 'responsibility'.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides insight into patients' thought processes surrounding an important treatment decision. Such insights might help the renal team to better understand, and thereby respect, patient choice in a patient-centred care paradigm. Findings may also be useful in the development of education programmes addressing the specific concerns of this population of patients.

Kidney transplant patients' attitudes towards self-management support: A Q-methodological study

OBJECTIVE

Kidney transplant recipients face many self-management challenges. We aimed to identify profiles of attitudes towards self-management support (SMS) shortly after kidney transplantation.

METHODS

Profiles were generated using Q-methodology: In face-to-face interviews participants rank-ordered opinion statements on aspects of SMS according to agreement. Socio-demographic and medical characteristics were assessed using a questionnaire. By-person factor analysis was used to analyze the rankings and qualitative data was used to support choice of profiles. The resulting factors represent clusters of patients with similar attitudes towards SMS.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients (mean age=56; 77% male) participated. Four profiles were identified: (A) transplant-focused and obedient; (B) holistic and collaborative; (C) life-focused and self-determined; and (D) was bipolar. The positive pole (D+) minimalizing and disengaged and the negative pole (D-) coping-focused and needy represent opposing viewpoints within the same profile. Socio-demographic and medical characteristics were not related to profile membership.

DISCUSSION

Each profile represents a specific attitude on post-transplant life, responsibility for health and decision-making, SMS needs, and preferences for SMS.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Patients vary in their attitude, needs and preferences for SMS indicating the necessity of providing personalized support after kidney transplantation. Health professionals should explore patients' SMS needs and adapt support accordingly.