Ganciclovir. A pharmacoeconomic review of its use as intravenous or oral maintenance therapy in the management of cytomegalovirus retinitis in patients with AIDS

Cytomegalovirus retinitis, an opportunistic infection caused by the herpesvirus cytomegalovirus, is a major cause of illness in patients with advanced AIDS. As infected patients require long term drug treatment to delay disease progression and minimise loss of vision, the disease is associated with substantial treatment costs which considerably increase overall expenditure on AIDS-related health care. During the last decade, intravenous ganciclovir has been a mainstay of treatment for patients with cytomegalovirus retinitis. However, notwithstanding its demonstrated efficacy as maintenance therapy for this condition, long term intravenous drug administration is both inconvenient and uncomfortable for many patients. Moreover, neutropenia and catheter-related infections have been reported commonly in patients receiving ganciclovir via the intravenous route. To overcome the limitations of intravenous ganciclovir, an oral formulation of the drug has been developed for use as maintenance therapy. In comparative clinical trials, both intravenous and oral ganciclovir maintenance therapy slowed disease progression and preserved visual acuity in patients with stabilised cytomegalo-virus retinitis, although there was evidence that the intravenous formulation was more effective in terms of delaying recurrence of active disease. This suggests that oral ganciclovir use should be limited to the treatment of patients without evidence of immediately sight-threatening cytomegalovirus retinitis. Three published cost analyses, which were based on efficacy and tolerability data derived from 2 randomised, comparative clinical trials, have shown that oral ganciclovir maintenance therapy offers cost advantages over intravenous maintenance therapy, despite the higher acquisition cost of the oral formulation. The higher overall costs of intravenous maintenance treatment, compared with oral therapy, were attributed to higher drug administration and adverse event treatment costs. In one analysis, estimated lifetime treatment costs of oral maintenance therapy were 25.2% lower than those of intravenous maintenance treatment. As yet, no formal cost-effectiveness evaluations of oral and intravenous ganciclovir have been published. Few published data are available regarding the relative effects of intravenous and oral ganciclovir on quality of life. However, in a health state utility analysis, there was a large overall preference among HIV-infected individuals for oral over intravenous maintenance treatment. In conclusion, oral ganciclovir appears to be a cost-saving and patient-preferred alternative to its intravenous counterpart for the maintenance therapy of AIDS patients with stabilised cytomegalovirus retinitis in whom there is no evidence of sight-threatening disease.

[Centralized preparation in the pharmacy of dilute solutions of ganciclovir: (Cymevan): work load change and economic potential]

The production of ganciclovir doses by a hospital pharmacy having the necessary facilities to reconstitute anticancer drugs would be of the utmost relevance regarding both protection of the nursing staff and therapeutic safety. As this activity is also economically worthwhile a large number of our colleagues would like to implement it. The aim of this work has was to take advantage of a 40 weeks production of ganciclovir dose by the pharmacy at Rangueil hospital in Toulouse so as to answer some of the questions raised by such a project. The savings achieved by the team at Brabois hospital in Vandoeuvre les Nancy could therefore be validated. They are expressed in fraction of flask per dose produced (0,265). Applied to the number of doses that we delivered over a 40 week period, this coefficient enabled us to estimate from the only datum which is initially available to us, namely the number of flasks used, the extra work load and the savings that could be made: given steady activity, the number of doses the pharmacy will have to prepare is equal to the number of flasks multiplied by 1.418 and, provided one opts for a production process mostly in batches, the savings will be equivalent to 37.5% of the flasks.

[The reduction of mother-child transmission of HIV infection in developing countries: potential intervention strategies, obstacles to implementation and perspectives. The Reduction of Mother-Child Transmission of HIV Infection in Africa Group]

Mother to child transmission (MCT) of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) is the main cause of the spread of the HIV epidemic in the pediatric population. It is estimated that to date, three million children worldwide have been infected by HIV. The epidemic burden in developing countries is dramatic. Ninety-five percent of the world's HIV-infected women are living in developing countries. In industrialized countries, antiretroviral treatment of pregnant women and newborns with azidothymidine (AZT, ACTG 076 regimen) and discouraging breast feeding by HIV-infected mothers are effectively reducing MCT of HIV. However, there are three major obstacles to the systematic application of these strategies in developing countries: (a) difficulties in implementing the complex AZT administration and its corollary the avoidance of breast feeding; (b) the complexity of the logistics of the ACTG 076 regimen; (c) cost. Indeed, in developing countries the socioeconomic situation of the populations are precarious and health structures and services are underdeveloped. In addition, the anxiety and the reluctance of general population in the face of the HIV problem and the high prevalence of maternal anemia reduce the acceptability and safety of AZT treatment for pregnant women in developing regions. Only interventions that are applicable, acceptable, safe, affordable, of low cost and integrated into health system will be able to reduce HIV MCT. We now know that MCT occurs mostly during the perinatal period and the maternal viral load in blood, in cervical secretions and in breast milk appears to be the main determinant of transmission. Maternal vitamin A deficiency may also favor MCT of HIV. It is however possible that this association is confounded by the relationship between advanced maternal HIV disease (a known risk factor for transmission) and vitamin A deficiency. In spite of these uncertainties concerning determinants of MCT of HIV, several interventions have been designed. The first involves treating the mother with antiretroviral drugs for the perinatal period. The second is vaginal disinfection by application of virucidal antiseptics during the perinatal period. The third is to give vitamin A supplements to pregnant women and children. Finally, passive immunotherapy with anti-HIV antibodies applied to pregnant women and/or new born, may be beneficial. The feasibility, safety and efficacy of these potential interventions have not yet been demonstrated in developing countries. In view of the dramatic spread of HIV infection in these countries, the evaluation of these interventions is of utmost priority. These trials are necessary because of the public health emergency but should be performed in strict respect of human rights and medical ethics.

HIV-1 protease inhibitors. A review for clinicians

OBJECTIVE

The clinical care of people infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) has been substantially affected by the introduction of HIV-specific protease inhibitors (PIs). The 4 PIs available are saquinavir mesylate, ritonavir, indinavir sulfate, and nelfinavir mesylate. Comparison studies have not been reported; therefore, an assessment of the available data to aid clinicians and patients in choosing appropriate treatment will be presented.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic review of peer-reviewed publications, abstracts from national and international conferences, and product registration information through September 1996.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Criteria used to select studies include their relevance to PIs, having been published in the English language, and pertinence for clinicians. Data quality and validity included the venue of the publication and relevance to clinical care.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Oral adminstration of ritonavir, indinavir, or nelfinavir generates sustainable drug serum levels to effectively inhibit the protease enzyme; however, saquinavir may not generate sustained levels necessary to inhibit the protease enzyme. Patients treated with ritonavir, indinavir, or nelfinavir experience similar reductions in viral load and increases in CD4+ lymphocytes; smaller effects occur among those treated with saquinavir. Two randomized placebo-controlled studies conducted among patients with severe immune system suppression and substantial zidovudine treatment experience demonstrated reduced HIV disease progression and reduced mortality with PI treatment. Genotypic resistance to PIs occurs; the clinical relevance of resistance is unclear. The costs of these agents including required monitoring impose new and substantial costs.

CONCLUSIONS

The PIs have emerged as critical drugs for people with HIV infection. Optimal use involves combination with reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Resistance develops to each agent, and cross-resistance is likely. These agents must be used at full doses with attention to ensuring patient compliance. The expense of these agents may be offset by forestalling disease progression and death and returning people to productive life. Selecting the initial PI must be individualized, and factors to consider include proven activity, possible toxicities, dosing regimens, drug interactions, and costs.

The eleventh international conference on AIDS: cautious celebration in Vancouver

For the first time in the short but turbulent history of the International Conference on AIDS (acquired immune deficiency syndrome), participants found themselves in the midst of a sea change in the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease. Scientists, health policy experts, politicians, and AIDS activists alike shared the anticipation. Report after report heralded improved outcomes in patients receiving combination therapy rather than monotherapy with reverse transcriptase inhibitors, particularly when investigators combined these agents with newly available protease inhibitors. The drug combinations dramatically reduced viral load in plasma, in some cases to undetectable levels, resulting in sharp rebounds in immune function. Even more encouraging is the pipeline for new and possibly more effective strategies. The cost of the new therapy for HIV disease, however, will limit the benefit to no more than 10% of the world's population infected with the virus.

How business is dealing with the AIDS epidemic

Employers geared up for astronomical HIV-related claims, but the avalanche never came. As new treatments improve prognoses and increase costs, the innovations of forward-thinking companies suggest useful strategies.