Radiology findings and non-invasive ventilation response

Although NIV is a simple and useful method, considerable variation in its use across countries, regions and hospitals may be noted. The patient should be evaluated according to subjective response (respiratory distress, consciousness, problems related to mask and airflow), physiological responses (respiration rate, respiratory effort, air leakage) and patient-ventilator compliance (gas exchange, pulse oximetry, arterial blood gases). Normalization in respiration rate within 1 or 2 hours after initiation of treatment is one of the most important markers for recovery. The goal is to maintain respiration rate between 20 and 30 breaths/minute. Reduction in intercostal and supraclavicular retractions, paradoxical respiration and sympathetic activity indicate success of treatment. Arterial blood gases are measured within first 2 hours in order to assess pH and CO2; and as needed thereafter. In general, NIV is assessed by arterial blood gases, hemodynamic parameters and several laboratory tests. There is limited number of studies in NIV. Here, we aimed to assess radiological implications of gas distribution within lung tissue during NIV therapy.

Non-Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in Critically Ill Trauma Patients: A Systematic Review

There is limited literature on non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) in patients with polytrauma-related acute respiratory failure (ARF). Despite an increasing worldwide application, there is still scarce evidence of significant NIMV benefits in this specific setting, and no clear recommendations are provided. We performed a systematic review, and a search of clinical databases including MEDLINE and EMBASE was conducted from the beginning of 1990 until today. Although the benefits in reducing the intubation rate, morbidity and mortality are unclear, NIMV may be useful and does not appear to be associated with harm when applied in properly selected patients with moderate ARF at an earlier stage of injury by experienced teams and in appropriate settings under strict monitoring. In the presence of these criteria, NIMV is worth attempting, but only if endotracheal intubation is promptly available because non-responders to NIMV are burdened by an increased mortality when intubation is delayed.