How does descending aorta geometry change when it dissects?

OBJECTIVES

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair is the treatment of choice in complicated acute type B aortic dissection. How to infer predissection aortic diameter is not well understood. Our aim was to delineate changes in descending aortic geometry due to dissection.

METHODS

Five tertiary centres reviewed their acute aortic dissection type B databases containing 802 patients. All patients who had undergone computed tomography angiography less than 2 years before and immediately after aortic dissection onset were included. We compared the aortic geometry before and after the dissection onset.

RESULTS

Altogether 25 patients were included [median age 60 (first quartile 52, third quartile 72) years; 60% men]. In all except 1 patient, the maximum descending aortic diameter was less than 45 mm before aortic dissection onset. The largest increase in diameter induced by the dissection was observed in the proximal descending aorta 28.2 (25.1, 32.1) vs 34.6 (31.3, 39.1) mm (+6.4 mm; +23%; P < 0.001). The thoracic descending aortic length increased after the dissection onset [253.3 (229.3, 271.9) vs 261.3 (247.9, 285.4) mm; P = 0.003]. The predissection aortic diameter of the proximal thoracic descending aorta was 7.9 (5.2, 10.7) mm larger (P < 0.001) than the post-dissection area-derived true-lumen diameter and 2.5 (1.3, 6.1) mm larger than the maximum true-lumen diameter (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Type B aortic dissection increases the diameter, length and volume of the descending thoracic aorta. The predissection aortic diameter most closely resembles the post-dissection maximum diameter of the true lumen.

Outcomes of Early-Onset Acute Type A Aortic Dissection - Influence of Etiologic Factors

BACKGROUND

Outcomes of early-onset acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) associated with Marfan syndrome (MFS) are known, but not with other etiologies. Methods and Results: ATAAD patients from 2 centers (n=1,001) were divided into 2 groups: age ≤45 years (n=93) and age >45 years (n=908). Although in-hospital death and 10-year survival were similar (12% vs. 7% and 62.6% vs. 67.3%), the 10-year aortic event-free survival differed (50.0% vs. 80.2%; P<0.01). ATAAD patients from 3 centers (n=132), all aged ≤45 years, were divided into 5 groups: lone hypertension (HTN, n=71), MFS (n=23), non-syndromic familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection (NS-FTAAD, n=16), bicuspid aortic valve (BAV, n=11), and no known etiologic factor (n=11). The incidence of severe aortic insufficiency varied between groups (HTN: 11%, MFS: 39%, NS-FTAAD: 38%, BAV: 55%, no known factor: 46%; P<0.01), whereas in-hospital death did not (14%, 22%, 0%, 0%, and 9%; P=0.061). The 10-year survival was 52.2%, 64.7%, 83.6%, 100%, and 90.9%, respectively, and 10-year aortic event-free survival was 55.6%, 36.3%, 77.5%, 90.0%, and 30.0%. Median descending aorta growth (mm/year) was 1.1 (0.1-3.4), 2.3 (0.3-5.3), 1.9 (1.3-2.7), 0.9 (-0.1-2.0), and 1.0 (-0.2-2.9) (P=0.15), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Late aortic events are common in young ATAAD patients. Known etiologic factors, though not BAV, negatively influence late outcomes in these patients.

A comparison of aortic root measurements by echocardiography and computed tomography

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study is to evaluate an optimal way to assess the dimensions of the aortic root and each of the sinuses of Valsalva and examine how a single measurement in 1 plane (echocardiography or 2-dimensional computed tomography) can underestimate the maximum dimension of the aortic root.

METHODS

Computed tomography and transthoracic echocardiography images of the aortic root and ascending aorta of 112 patients were analyzed. The minimum and maximum aortic root dimensions, the root perimeter, and the total area of all 3 sinuses of Valsalva were measured on a plane perpendicular to the long axis of the aorta using 3-dimensional multiplanar reconstruction. Moreover, the maximum root dimension was compared with the measurements obtained from the echocardiography and 2-dimensional computed tomography angiography measurements.

RESULTS

The difference in the measurements of the minimum and maximum root dimension was 5.4 ± 3.2 mm (range, 0-21 mm, P < .0001) and was significantly larger in patients with bicuspid aortic valves compared with those with tricuspid valves (6.3 ± 4 mm, range, 0-21 mm vs 4.9 ± 2.6 mm, range, 0-15 mm, P = .036). The maximum root dimension measured in 3-dimensional multiplanar reconstruction (49.1 ± 9.0 mm) differed significantly from the root dimension measured in transthoracic echocardiography in the parasternal long-axis view (44.8 ± 8.4 mm) and 2-dimensional computed tomography (axial plane: 45.5 ± 9.0 mm, coronal plane: 46.1 ± 8.8 mm, sagittal plane: 45.1 ± 8.9 mm) (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The difference in the measurements of the minimum and maximum aortic root dimensions is significant and may exceed 20 mm, especially in patients with bicuspid aortic valves. Therefore, aortic root dimensions can be significantly underestimated with the measurement (echocardiography, computed tomography angiography) performed in only 1 plane.

The evaluation of the aortic annulus displacement during cardiac cycle using magnetic resonance imaging

Background

The stress in the ascending aorta results from many biomechanical factors including the geometry of the vessel and its maximum dimensions, arterial blood pressure and longitudinal systolic stretching due to heart motion. The stretching of the ascending aorta resulting from the longitudinal displacement of the aortic annulus during the heart cycle has not been examined in the general population so far. The aim of the study is to evaluate this parameter using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in the general population in all age groups.

Methods

The cardiac magnetic resonance images of 73 patients were evaluated. The maximum distance to which the ventriculo-aortic junction was pulled by the contracting heart (LDAA – longitudinal displacement of the aortic annulus) was measured in the cine coronal sequences. Moreover, the maximum dimensions of the aortic root and the ascending aorta were assessed.

Results

The LDAA value was on average 11.6 ± 2.9 mm (range: 3-19 mm; 95% CI: 10.9–12.3 mm) and did not differ between males and females (11.8 ± 2.9 mm vs. 11.2 ± 2.9 mm, p = .408). The diameter of the ascending aorta was 32 ± 6.3 mm (range: 20-57 mm). The maximal dimension of the aortic root was 35 ± 5.1 mm (range: 18-42 mm). There was a statistically significant negative correlation between the LDAA and the age of patients (r = −.38, p = .001). There was no significant correlation between the LDAA and aortic root dimension (r = .1, p = .409) and between the LDAA and diameter of the ascending aorta (r = .16, p = .170).

Conclusions

Human aortic root and ascending aorta are significantly stretched during systole and the distance to which the aorta is stretched decreases with age. The measurement of the longitudinal displacement of the aortic annulus using the CMR is feasible and reproducible.

Valve sparing aortic root replacement and beating-heart aortic arch replacement in Frozen Elephant Trunk technique

Correction of extensive aortic pathology often requires a combined surgical approach. This video tutorial presents the technical aspects of beating-heart aortic arch replacement in the frozen elephant trunk technique in combination with valve-sparing aortic root replacement.

Intraoperative detection of circulating tumor cells in pulmonary venous blood during metastasectomy for colorectal lung metastases

Circulating tumor cells (CTC) have been studied extensively in various tumor types and are a well-established prognosticator in colorectal cancer (CRC). This is the first study to isolate CTC directly from the tumor outflow in secondary lung tumors. For this purpose in 24 patients with CRC who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy in curative intent blood was drawn intraoperatively from the pulmonary vein (tumor outflow). In 22 samples CTC-enumeration was performed using CellSieve-microfilters and immunohistochemical- and Giemsa-staining. Additionally 10 blood samples were analyzed using the CellSearch-System. We could isolate more CTC in pulmonary venous blood (total 41, range 0-15) than in samples taken from the periphery at the same time (total 6, range 0-5, p = 0.09). Tumor positive lymph nodes correlated with presence of CTC in pulmonary venous blood as in all cases CTC were present (p = 0.006). Our findings suggest a tumor cell release from pulmonary metastases in CRC and a correlation of CTC isolated from the tumor outflow with established negative prognostic markers in metastasized CRC. The presented data warrant further investigations regarding the significance of local tumor compartments when analyzing circulating markers and the possibility of tumor cell shedding from secondary lung tumors.