Abstract 5666: Safety of the first-in-class anti-NKG2A monoclonal antibody monalizumab in combination with cetuximab: a phase Ib/II study in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN)

Background:

Monalizumab (IPH2201) is a first-in-class immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting CD94-NKG2A receptors expressed on tumor infiltrating cytotoxic CD8 T lymphocytes and NK cells. HLA-E, the ligand of this inhibitory checkpoint receptor is up-regulated in SCCHN, protecting cancer from killing by CD94-NKG2A+ cells. Monalizumab blocks binding of CD94-NKG2A to HLA-E, reducing inhibitory signaling and thereby enhancing NK and T cell anti-tumor responses. Cetuximab is an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody blocking oncogenic signaling and inducing Fcγ receptor-mediated antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). In vitro cetuximab-mediated ADCC is inhibited by HLA-E expression on target cells and this inhibition can be circumvented with CD94-NKG2A blockade. Combination of monalizumab and cetuximab might provide greater antitumor activity than either drug alone.

Methods:

A multicenter, non-randomized dose-escalation and expansion study is evaluating monalizumab plus cetuximab in patients with R/M SCCHN (NCT02643550). Patients ≥ 18 years who progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy (regardless of the number of previous lines of treatment) were enrolled, without regard to HLA-E or human papilloma virus status. Using a 3+3 design, 5 dose levels of monalizumab (0.4, 1, 2, 4 or 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks) were explored with fixed doses of cetuximab (400 mg/m² load followed by 250 mg/m² weekly). Patients were treated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective was to evaluate safety and Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT). The secondary objectives were to estimate the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) and the Recommended Phase II Dose (RP2D), and to determine the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and immunogenicity of the combination.

Results:

Enrolment began in December, 2015. As of October 11, 2016, 13 patients with R/M SCCHN were enrolled at dose levels 0.4, 1, 2 and 4 mg/kg. Median age was 60 years (range: 40-74); 92% were male; PS was 0 or 1; all patients had received prior systemic therapy (1 prior line in 1 patient and > 2

lines in 12 patients) for R/M SCCHN including platinum based chemotherapy (100% of the patients) and cetuximab (85%). There were no DLTs, infusion related reactions, immune related disorders or deaths related to treatment. No discontinuation attributable to treatment-related adverse events and no treatment-related grade 3 and 4 adverse events were reported, except fatigue (grade 3) in one patient. Updated data including pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics on the full dose escalation part will be presented.

Conclusion:

Monalizumab + cetuximab were well tolerated with no additional safety concerns compared to monalizumab or cetuximab alone. The dose-expansion phase of the study will be initiated in the near future.

Citation Format: Roger B. Cohen, Sébastien Salas, Caroline Even, Nuria Kotecki, Antonio Jimeno, Anne-Marie Soulié, Anne Tirouvanziam-Martin, Robert Zerbib, Pascale André, Agnès Boyer-Chammard, Jérôme Fayette. Safety of the first-in-class anti-NKG2A monoclonal antibody monalizumab in combination with cetuximab: a phase Ib/II study in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5666. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-5666

Abstract CT021: Tumor-associated immune cell PD-L1 expression and peripheral immune profiling: Analyses from CheckMate 141

Introduction: In the phase 3 study CheckMate 141 (NCT02105636), patients with platinum-refractory head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab (NIVO) had longer median overall survival (OS) (7.5 vs 5.1 months; P=0.01) and a higher objective response rate (all: 13.3 vs 5.8%; tumor PD-L1 ≥1%: 17 vs 1.6%) compared with investigator’s choice (IC) (Ferris et al. NEJM. 2016). This exploratory analysis evaluated the immune profile of patients from CheckMate 141, in context of tumor PD-L1 expression, and assessed the relationship with treatment (txt) outcomes.

Methods: PD-L1 expression in tumor and tumor-associated immune cells (TAIC) was analyzed at baseline (n=252) and assessed for association with clinical outcome. Tumor PD-L1 expression was quantitatively assessed using Dako IHC 28-8 pharmDx assay. TAIC PD-L1 abundance (numerous/intermediate, rare) and location (intra/intra-peritumoral, peritumoral) were qualitatively assessed (unvalidated). Peripheral blood (n=36) at baseline and day 43 was assessed for immune cell biomarkers by flow cytometry and analyzed by 2-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons test correction.

Results: Abundant PD-L1+ TAICs (numerous/intermediate) were associated with greater median OS with NIVO vs IC in tumors with PD-L1 ≥1% (abundant: 8.7 vs 4.4 months, hazard ratio [HR] and 95% CI 0.44 [0.27, 0.71] and rare: 6.7 vs 4.9 months, HR 0.88 [0.42, 1.86]) and PD-L1 <1% (abundant: 12.7 vs 8.4 months, HR 0.73 [0.38, 1.41] and rare: 3.7 vs 4.6 months, HR 1.02 [0.45, 2.30]). Abundant, but not rare, PD-L1+ TAICs were associated with response to NIVO vs IC in tumors with PD-L1 ≥1% (abundant: 23 vs 0%, odds ratio [OR] and 95% CI 18.98 [1.03, 348.17] and rare: 17 vs 8%, OR 1.73 [0.21, 14.63]) and PD-L1 <1% (abundant: 22 vs 14%, OR 1.61 [0.40, 6.49] and rare: 6 vs 14%, OR 0.39 [0.03, 5.10]). Intra/intra-peritumoral location of PD-L1+ TAICs was associated with greater median OS with NIVO vs IC in tumors with PD-L1 ≥1% (8.2 vs 4.4 months, HR 0.54 [0.33, 0.89]) and PD-L1 <1% (7.1 vs 5.1 months HR 0.63 [0.34, 1.14]). Peritumoral location of PD-L1+ TAICs was associated with greater median OS with NIVO vs IC in tumors with PD-L1 ≥1% (8.7 vs 4.3 months HR 0.55 [0.27, 1.15]) but not PD-L1 <1% (4.3 vs 10.6 months HR 1.72 [0.58, 5.08]). In the circulation, NIVO responders had higher total CD8+ T cells at baseline and on txt (both mean 22.5 vs 12.8%, P=0.04) and lower PD-1+ Tregs at baseline (mean 18.7 vs 33.4%, P<0.01) and on txt (mean 11.7 vs 19.7%, P<0.01) vs non-responders, and lower CTLA-4+ CD8+ T cells on txt vs at baseline (mean 8.2 vs 5.4%, P=0.02).

Conclusion: In this exploratory, qualitative immune profile analysis, abundance of PD-L1+ TAICs was associated with higher median OS and greater likelihood of response to NIVO vs IC. Response to NIVO may be associated with higher circulating CD8+ T cells and lower Tregs at baseline, and abundant PD-L1+ TAICs in the tumor microenvironment.

Citation Format: Robert L. Ferris, George Blumenschein, Kevin Harrington, Jérôme Fayette, Joël Guigay, A. Dimitrios Colevas, Lisa Licitra, Stefan Kasper, Caroline Even, Francis Worden, Nabil F. Saba, Everett Vokes, Cheryl Ho, Fernando Concha-Benavente, Danielle Greenawalt, Chelsea Jin, Mark Lynch, Makoto Tahara, Robert Haddad, Manish Monga, Henry Kao, Maura Gillison. Tumor-associated immune cell PD-L1 expression and peripheral immune profiling: Analyses from CheckMate 141 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT021. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-CT021

Nivolumab versus standard, single-agent therapy of investigator's choice in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (CheckMate 141): health-related quality-of-life results from a randomised, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with platinum-refractory recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck have few treatment options and poor prognosis. Nivolumab significantly improved survival of this patient population when compared with standard single-agent therapy of investigator's choice in Checkmate 141; here we report the effect of nivolumab on patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

METHODS

CheckMate 141 was a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck who progressed within 6 months after platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (n=240) or investigator's choice (n=121) of methotrexate (40-60 mg/m² of body surface area), docetaxel (30-40 mg/m²), or cetuximab (250 mg/m² after a loading dose of 400 mg/m²) until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. On Jan 26, 2016, the independent data monitoring committee reviewed the data at the planned interim analysis and declared overall survival superiority for nivolumab over investigator's choice therapy (primary endpoint; described previously). The protocol was amended to allow patients in the investigator's choice group to cross over to nivolumab. All patients not on active therapy are being followed for survival. As an exploratory endpoint, PROs were assessed at baseline, week 9, and every 6 weeks thereafter using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30), the EORTC head and neck cancer-specific module (EORTC QLQ-H&N35), and the three-level European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire. Differences within and between treatment groups in PROs were analysed by ANCOVA among patients with baseline and at least one other assessment. All randomised patients were included in the time to clinically meaningful deterioration analyses. Median time to clinically meaningful deterioration was analysed by Kaplan-Meier methods. CheckMate 141 was registered with ClinicalTrials.org, number NCT02105636.

FINDINGS

Patients were enrolled between May 29, 2014, and July 31, 2015, and subsequently 361 patients were randomly assigned to receive nivolumab (n=240) or investigator's choice (n=121). Among them, 129 patients (93 in the nivolumab group and 36 in the investigator's choice group) completed any of the PRO questionnaires at baseline and at least one other assessment. Treatment with nivolumab resulted in adjusted mean changes from baseline to week 15 ranging from -2·1 to 5·4 across functional and symptom domains measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30, with no domains indicating clinically meaningful deterioration. By contrast, eight (53%) of the 15 domains in the investigator's choice group showed clinically meaningful deterioration (10 points or more) at week 15 (change from baseline range, -24·5 to 2·4). Similarly, on the EORTC QLQ-H&N35, clinically meaningful worsening at week 15 was seen in no domains in the nivolumab group and eight (44%) of 18 domains in the investigator's choice group. Patients in the nivolumab group had a clinically meaningful improvement (according to a difference of 7 points or greater) in adjusted mean change from baseline to week 15 on the EQ-5D visual analogue scale, in contrast to a clinically meaningful deterioration in the investigator's choice group (7·3 vs -7·8). Differences between groups were significant and clinically meaningful at weeks 9 and 15 in favour of nivolumab for role functioning, social functioning, fatigue, dyspnoea, and appetite loss on the EORTC QLQ-C30 and pain and sensory problems on the EORTC QLQ-H&N35. Median time to deterioration was significantly longer with nivolumab versus investigator's choice for 13 (37%) of 35 domains assessed across the three questionnaires.

INTERPRETATION

In this exploratory analysis of CheckMate 141, nivolumab stabilised symptoms and functioning from baseline to weeks 9 and 15, whereas investigator's choice led to clinically meaningful deterioration. Nivolumab delayed time to deterioration of patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes compared with single-agent therapy of investigator's choice in patients with platinum-refractory recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. In view of the major unmet need in this population and the importance of maintaining or improving quality of life for patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, these data support nivolumab as a new standard-of-care option in this setting.

FUNDING

Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Nivolumab (Nivo) vs investigator’s choice (IC) for platinum-refractory (PR) recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN; Checkmate 141): Outcomes in first-line (1L) R/m patients and updated safety and efficacy

6019

Background: In CheckMate 141, a randomized, phase 3 trial, nivo demonstrated superior overall survival (OS) and better tolerability in patients (pts) with PR R/M SCCHN compared with IC. Pts with SCCHN progressing within 6 mos of platinum in the primary treatment setting have dismal prognosis. We report outcomes in pts who were PR in the primary or adjuvant setting, and updated results in the overall population. Methods: Pts (N = 361) with PR R/M SCCHN were randomized 2:1 to nivo 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks or weekly IC (methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab). Primary endpoint was OS estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and confidence intervals (CIs). Additional endpoints include objective response rate (ORR) and safety. Outcomes were analyzed overall and post hoc in pts who were PR in the primary/adjuvant setting and received nivo/IC as 1L R/M therapy. Results: Characteristics of the 78 (21.6%) pts who received nivo (n = 52) or IC (n = 26) in the 1L R/M setting were similar to the overall population.Nivo significantly improved OS vs IC among 1L R/M pts (median [95% CI]: 7.7 mo [3.1, 13.8] vs 3.3 mo [2.1, 6.4]; HR [95% CI] = 0.56 [0.33, 0.95]); 12-mo OS rate: 39.2% vs 15.4%. ORR was 19.2% for nivo vs 11.5% for IC in this subgroup. At 11.4-mo minimum follow-up, updated efficacy and safety in the overall population were similar to the primary analysis. Median OS (95% CI) was 7.7 mo (5.7, 8.8) for nivo vs 5.1 mo (4.0, 6.2) for IC; HR (95% CI) = 0.71 (0.55, 0.90); P = 0.0048. For nivo vs IC, the 18-mo OS rate was 21.5% vs 8.3% and ORR was 13.3% vs 5.8%. Nivo doubled the median duration of response vs IC (9.7 vs 4.0 mo). Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse event rates for nivo vs IC were 15.3% vs 36.0% overall and 27.5% vs 32.0% for 1L R/M pts; there were no new deaths due to study drug toxicity. Conclusions: Nivo significantly improved OS and increased ORR vs IC in a 1L R/M subgroup, supporting its use as 1L therapy for pts with PR R/M SCCHN. Nivo continued to show a significant survival benefit and better tolerability vs IC in pts with PR R/M SCCHN. Clinical trial information: NCT02105636.

PREDICTOR (UNICANCER GEP11): Randomized phase II study of preoperative afatinib in untreated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients

6021

Background: Afatinib, a pan-HER irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor, demonstrated limited antitumor activity compared to methotrexate in unselected recurrent and/or metastatic HNSCC patients (LUX-HN1, Machiels et al, Lancet Oncol 2015). The UNICANCER (GEP 11) PREDICTOR study’s objective was to identify predictive and pharmacodynamic biomarkers of biological activity and efficacy of afatinib (EUDRACT N° 2010-024046-29). Methods: This open-label, randomized, multicentric, controlled, phase II study included untreated patients with operable T2-4N0-2M0 HNSCC of the oral cavity, pharynx and larynx, with a PS < 2, adequate organ function and LVEF > 50%. Patients were randomized (2:1) to: oral afatinib (A) 40mg/day (d) for 14-28d or no treatment (NT). Patients had pre-treatment tumor biopsies, tumor imaging, and PET CT scan, with a 2nd tumor imaging before surgery and a PET scan at D15. Adverse events were classified by NCI CTCAE criteria. Based on the biological primary endpoint of tumor reduction the sample size was designed to identify biomarkers associated with a 20% difference between the study arms. Results: 61 patients were included (A: 41/NT: 20). 2 patients in the NT arm were not analyzed (consent withdrawal, no surgery). 7 patients in arm A received < 14d of treatment, including 6 patients with unacceptable toxicity. Afatinib-related toxicities were: grade (G)1 37%, G2 41%, G3 7%, G4 5%, and G5 0%. G≥3 toxicities were mainly gastrointestinal. Partial responses (RECIST1.1) were observed in 3 patients (7.3%) in arm A versus none in the NT arm (p = 0.018). Progressive disease was not observed in arm A versus 3 (16.6%) in the NT arm. Partial responses on PET CT scan by PERCIST were observed in 15/31 evaluable patients (48%) in arm A versus 1/15 (6.7%) in the NT arm (p = 0.005). Conclusions: Afatinib given to HNSCC patients in the preoperative setting is safe and is associated with improved response according to RECIST1.1 and PERCIST compared to no treatment. Clinical trial information: NCT01415674.

Characterization of potential predictive biomarkers of response to nivolumab in CheckMate 141 in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN)

6050

Background: Nivolumab, an anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody, demonstrated longer median overall survival (7.5 vs 5.1 months) and improved response (13.3% vs 5.8%) versus investigator choice chemotherapy (ICC) in patients with recurrent SCCHN after platinum failure in CheckMate 141 (NCT02105636), a randomized, open-label Phase 3 trial. We screened peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) to identify biomarkers which may predict response to nivolumab. Methods: Paired baseline (day 1) and on treatment (day 43) PBL samples (n = 36; 24 nivolumab; 12 ICC) were analyzed using multicolor flow cytometry and a non-competing anti-PD-1 antibody. Results were correlated with clinical outcome: responders (complete/partial response) and non-responders (stable or progressive disease). Results: Levels of CD8+ T cells at baseline and on treatment were higher in nivolumab responders compared to non-responders (23% vs 13%; P< 0.05). Interestingly, PD-1+ CD8+ and PD-1+ CTLA-4+ CD8+ effector T cells (likely exhausted T cells) decreased about 2-fold following nivolumab in both responders and non-responders ( P< 0.05), whereas, the decrease in CTLA-4+ CD8+ effector T cells following nivolumab was significant in responders only (8% vs 5%; P< 0.05). Levels of PD-1+ TIM-3+ CD8+ effector cells decreased following nivolumab in non-responders only (11% vs 7%; P< 0.05), a similar non-significant reduction was observed in responders. Levels of PD-1+ Tregs were lower in responders than non-responders at baseline (19% vs 33%; P< 0.01), and following nivolumab (12% vs 20%; P< 0.001). As in T-effector cell populations, PD-1+ Tregs decreased about 1.6-fold after nivolumab in both responders and non-responders ( P< 0.01). Interestingly, baseline Ki67+ Treg levels were lower in non-responders (28% vs 17%; P< 0.05). Conclusions: Response to nivolumab may be associated with higher levels of CD8+ T cells and CTLA-4+ CD8+ effector T cells, and lower PD-1+ CD8+ effector T cells and PD-1+ Tregs at baseline. Targeting both PD-1 and CTLA-4 axes is warranted in SCCHN to overcome suppressive signals in CD8+ effector T cells and in Treg cells expressing both checkpoint receptors. Clinical trial information: NCT02105636.

Notch pathway inhibition with LY3039478 in adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC)

6024

Background: ACCs have high levels of Notch-1 receptor expression and activation. LY3039478 (LY) is an orally bioavailable selective Notch inhibitor (Notch 1-4). Here we report on safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and anti-tumor activity of LY in patients (pts) with ACC. Methods: Ongoing, multi-part, phase I trial enrolled pts with advanced or metastatic ACC, measurable disease, ECOG ≤1, and baseline tumor tissue. Eligible pts received LY 50 mg three times per week (TIW), on a 28-day cycle until disease progression. Safety assessments were based on CTCAE V4.0. Tumor responses were assessed using RECIST 1.1. Primary objectives are to confirm the recommended phase II dose of LY and document antitumor activity. Secondary objectives are safety and toxicity, PK and progression-free survival (PFS). Exploratory objectives include assessment for PET metabolic responses. Results: 22 pts have been enrolled and received LY 50mg TIW (13 men, 9 women; median age 60, range 41-82). All pts had metastatic disease; median treatment duration was 3 cycles (range 1-10) with 6 pts continuing on treatment. One pt had an unconfirmed partial response. Disease control rate (DCR) was 16/22 (73%), of which 4 pts had stable disease ≥ 6 months. In the overall group (n = 22) median PFS (mPFS) was 5.3 months (95% CI: 2.4, NE). mPFS was 7.7 (95% CI: 4.0, NE) for pts in second line (n = 7), while mPFS was 2.4 (95% CI: 1.1, NE) for pts in third line or more (n = 9). In pts without prior systemic therapy (n = 6) mPFS could not be estimated since 4 of those patients were censored. In preliminary analysis, 14 pts were assessed by PET, with 2 (14%) achieving partial metabolic response. Most frequent related adverse events (all grades) occurring in ≥20% of pts included diarrhea (55%), fatigue (45%), vomiting (36%), decreased appetite (27%), dry mouth (27%), and dry skin (23%). Grade 3/4 related treatment-emergent adverse events observed in more than one pt were diarrhea (n = 3) and squamous cell carcinoma of skin (n = 2). PK was assessed in 17 pts, with peak concentrations occurring approximately 2 hours post-dose. Biomarker and histologic analyses of pre and post treatment biopsies will be presented. Conclusions: LY showed activity (73% DCR) in ACC with a manageable safety profile. Clinical trial information: NCT01695005.

Mutational profile of HPV-driven head and neck cancers according to tobacco consumption

e17535

Background: HPV-driven oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients are characterized by a better prognosis than their HPV-negative counterparts. However, this significant survival advantage is not homogeneous and studies have highlighted that among HPV-positive patients those with a smoking history have a significantly increased risk of disease progression and death compared to those who have never smoked. The reason why tobacco consumption impacts negatively the prognosis is still elusive. Tobacco might induce additional genetic alterations leading to a more aggressive phenotype. The purpose of this study is to characterize the mutational profile of HPV-positive OPC by smoking status. We hypothesize a higher frequency of mutations affecting among smokers. Methods: Targeted next-generation sequencing of 38 oncogenes/tumor suppressor genes that are commonly mutated in cancers caused by tobacco/alcohol consumption was performed in 62 HPV-driven OPC cases stratified by smoking status. Results: The study population included 37 (60%) non-smokers and 25 (40%) smokers distributed as follows: 1 (4%) patient smoked <10 pack-year (PY), 8 (32%) patients between 10-20 PY and 16 (64%) >20 PY. Twenty (31%) patients had no mutation, 14 (23%) had 1 mutation and 28 (46%) had 2 or more mutations. The most commonly mutated genes regardless of tobacco consumption were PIK3CA (20%), MLL2 (20%), TP53 (8%), FAT 1 (15%), FBXW7 (16%), NOTCH 1 (9%) and FGFR3 (9%). Mutation rate was not significantly different in smokers compared to non-smokers even when analyses focused on heavy smokers (>20 pack-years compared to <20 pack-years). Similarly there was no significant difference in mutations patterns according to tobacco consumption. The 3 years overall survival, disease-specific-survival and loco-regional-control rates for the whole cohort are respectively 88% (95% CI: 76.4-94.1), 88% (95% CI: 76.4-94.1) and 80.6% (95% CI: 67.5-88.8). Despite a median follow-up was 4.5 years (6 months to 11.7 years), the few number of events (13 relapses, 13 deaths including 10 due to OPC) precludes detailed prognosis analyses. Conclusions: HPV-driven OPC patients with a smoking history have a comparable mutational rate than non-smokers. Smoking impact on the prognosis isn’t attributable to the mutational burden. Further studies are warranted.

Nivolumab (Nivo) vs investigator’s choice (IC) in patients with recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN): Efficacy and safety in CheckMate 141 by prior cetuximab use

6020

Background: In CheckMate 141, nivo resulted in significantly prolonged overall survival (OS), favorable safety, and stable quality of life vs IC in patients (pts) with platinum-refractory (PR) R/M SCCHN. Cetuximab, a formal trial stratification factor, permits exploratory subgroup assessment. Outcomes by prior cetuximab use are described. Methods: CheckMate 141 was a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial (NCT02105636) in which pts (N = 361) with PR R/M SCCHN were randomized 2:1 and stratified by prior cetuximab use to nivo 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks or IC of methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab. The primary endpoint was OS; additional endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. A multivariate analysis will explore influence of additional factors. Results: Nivo improved OS vs IC regardless of prior cetuximab, and improvement was greater in pts without prior cetuximab (Table). Median OS was longer for nivo vs IC in pts with PD-L1 expression ≥ 1% regardless of prior cetuximab, and in pts with PD-L1 expression < 1% without prior cetuximab. Among pts with PD-L1 expression ≥ 1%, ORR was higher with nivo vs IC with/without prior cetuximab. PFS was similar regardless of prior cetuximab. Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse event rates for nivo vs IC were 11.7% vs 40.9% with prior cetuximab and 15.4% vs 26.7% without prior cetuximab. Conclusions: OS and ORR improved with nivo vs IC regardless of prior cetuximab use, and the magnitude of benefit was greater in pts without prior cetuximab exposure. These results support the use of nivo for R/M SCCHN regardless of prior cetuximab use. Clinical trial information: NCT02105636. [Table: see text]

Long-term response in patient with recurrent oropharyngeal carcinoma treated with cetuximab, docetaxel and cisplatin (TPEx) as first-line treatment followed by cetuximab maintenance

BACKGROUND

Cetuximab, an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody in combination with platinum and 5FU is the standard of care in first-line treatment of patients with recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), with an expected median outcome of 10months. For this population, development of efficacious and safer therapies is still needed.

CASE REPORT

A 62-year-old male with a first recurrence of human papillomavirus positive stage IVA (T3N2bM0) adenocarcinoma of the glossotonsillar sulcus not amenable to locoregional curative treatment was offered chemotherapy as part of the TPEx clinical trial. He was treated by cetuximab (loading dose 400mg/m² on day 1 cycle 1, then 250mg/m² weekly), and chemotherapy (cisplatin 75mg/m² and docetaxel 75mg/m², on day 1). Cycles were repeated every 21days for 4 cycles (TPEx regimen) with systematic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support at each cycle. Bi-monthly maintenance cetuximab 500mg/m² was then administered. The patient showed a clinical complete response according to RECIST 1.1 criteria after 5months maintenance, with progression-free survival of 25months. Relapses that followed were treated with stereotactic irradiation, radiofrequency ablation, cetuximab and paclitaxel. The patient is alive eleven years after cancer diagnosis and remains controlled for his disease, with a cumulative period of 59months of cetuximab administration (equivalence of 121 injections).

CONCLUSION

This case report demonstrated that TPEx regimen, by synergistic interaction between taxanes and cetuximab, followed by bimonthly cetuximab maintenance may lead to patient complete remission within the first year of treatment. Furthermore, prolonged intermittent treatment with cetuximab seems to participate in the improved survival associated with preserved quality of life. Key favorable prognostic factors may be moderate tumor differentiation, oropharyngeal location, HPV p16 positive tumor status.

Cabazitaxel in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: phase II UNICANCER trial ORL03

Treatments are limited after platinum Cetuximab or anti-PD1 failure for patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cabazitaxel has increased overall survival in hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer after failure of Docetaxel. Our aim was to detect a signal of activity with Cabazitaxel in patients with head and neck cancer who had failed platinum-, Cetuximab- and taxanes-based chemotherapy.

This multicenter phase II trial included progressive patients with an ECOG ≤2. Cabazitaxel was given at 25 mg/m²/3 weeks (maximum of 10 cycles), with growth factors support. Efficacy was centralized and assessed every 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was control rate at six-weeks. A Simon’s two-stage optimal design (P0=0.10; P1=0.30) required 29 evaluable patients. At the end of trial, at least 6 non-progressions were required to consider the drug worthy of further study.

Out of the 31 enrolled patients, 29 were eligible; 42% had received at least three previous lines of chemotherapy. For the primary end point, 8 patients (27.6%; 95%CI 12.7%-47.2%) had a stable disease at six weeks. Median progression-free survival was 1.05 months (95%CI 0.69-2.07). All patients were analyzed for toxicity: 6 patients had febrile neutropenia.

During the 81 cycles administered, 49 grade 3-5 events were observed concerning 81% of the patients, including 35 severe adverse events of which 15 were related to Cabazitaxel.

Although Cabazitaxel met its primary endpoint to deserve further investigations, its toxicity makes it difficult to use in frail patients and new schemes are needed (20 mg/m² for example) if further investigations are launched.

Characterization of potential predictive biomarkers of response to nivolumab in CheckMate-141 in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN)

5

Background: Nivolumab, an anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody, demonstrated longer median overall survival (7.5 vs. 5.1 months) and improved response (13.3% vs. 5.8%) versus investigator choice chemotherapy (ICC) in patients with recurrent SCCHN after platinum failure in CheckMate 141 (NCT02105636), a randomized, open-label Phase 3 trial. We screened peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) to identify biomarkers which may predict response to nivolumab. Methods: Paired baseline (day 1) and on treatment (day 43) PBL samples (n=36; 24 nivolumab; 12 ICC) were analyzed using multicolor flow cytometry and a non-competing anti-PD-1 antibody. Results were correlated with clinical outcome: responders (complete/partial response) and non-responders (stable or progressive disease). Results: Levels of CD8+ T cells at baseline and on treatment were higher in nivolumab responders compared to non-responders (23% vs. 13%; p<0.05). Interestingly, PD-1+ CD8+ and PD-1+ CTLA-4+ CD8+ effector T cells (likely exhausted T cells) decreased about 2-fold following nivolumab in both responders and non-responders (p<0.05), whereas, the decrease in CTLA-4+ CD8+ effector T cells following nivolumab was significant in responders only (8% vs. 5%; p<0.05). Levels of PD-1+ TIM-3+ CD8+ effector cells decreased following nivolumab in non-responders only (11% vs. 7%; p<0.05), a similar non-significant reduction was observed in responders. Levels of PD-1+Tregs were lower in responders than non-responders at baseline (19% vs. 33%; p<0.01), and following nivolumab (12% vs. 20%; p<0.001). As in T effector cell populations, PD-1+ Tregs decreased about 1.6-fold after nivolumab in both responders and non-responders (p<0.01). Interestingly, baseline Ki67+ Treg levels were lower in non-responders (28% vs. 17%; p<0.05). Conclusions: Response to nivolumab may be associated with higher levels of CD8+ T cells and CTLA-4+ CD8+ effector T cells, and lower PD-1+ CD8+ effector T cells and PD-1+ Tregs at baseline. Targeting both PD-1 and CTLA-4 axes is warranted in SCCHN to overcome suppressive signals in CD8+ effector T cells and in Treg cells expressing both checkpoint receptors. Clinical trial information: NCT02105636.

Nivolumab for Recurrent Squamous-Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

BACKGROUND

Patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck after platinum chemotherapy have a very poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. Nivolumab, an anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody, was assessed as treatment for this condition.

METHODS

In this randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial, we assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, 361 patients with recurrent squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck whose disease had progressed within 6 months after platinum-based chemotherapy to receive nivolumab (at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram of body weight) every 2 weeks or standard, single-agent systemic therapy (methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab). The primary end point was overall survival. Additional end points included progression-free survival, rate of objective response, safety, and patient-reported quality of life.

RESULTS

The median overall survival was 7.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.5 to 9.1) in the nivolumab group versus 5.1 months (95% CI, 4.0 to 6.0) in the group that received standard therapy. Overall survival was significantly longer with nivolumab than with standard therapy (hazard ratio for death, 0.70; 97.73% CI, 0.51 to 0.96; P=0.01), and the estimates of the 1-year survival rate were approximately 19 percentage points higher with nivolumab than with standard therapy (36.0% vs. 16.6%). The median progression-free survival was 2.0 months (95% CI, 1.9 to 2.1) with nivolumab versus 2.3 months (95% CI, 1.9 to 3.1) with standard therapy (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.13; P=0.32). The rate of progression-free survival at 6 months was 19.7% with nivolumab versus 9.9% with standard therapy. The response rate was 13.3% in the nivolumab group versus 5.8% in the standard-therapy group. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 13.1% of the patients in the nivolumab group versus 35.1% of those in the standard-therapy group. Physical, role, and social functioning was stable in the nivolumab group, whereas it was meaningfully worse in the standard-therapy group.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with platinum-refractory, recurrent squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck, treatment with nivolumab resulted in longer overall survival than treatment with standard, single-agent therapy. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb; CheckMate 141 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02105636 .).

Induction chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy alone in locally advanced non-endemic nasopharyngeal carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of induction chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil (TPF) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (IC+CCRT) or CCRT alone in non-endemic locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data of 106 patients with NPC treated from January 1999 to June 2012 with IC+CCRT (n=58) or CCRT alone (n=48) were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 6.4years. Distribution of age, performance status, stage and concurrent chemotherapy regimen were imbalanced between the two groups. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were not significantly different between IC+CCRT and CCRT groups (OS: 78.3% vs. 82.7%, p=0.77; PFS: 72.5% vs. 68.2%, p=0.81, respectively). There were less total cumulative incidence of grade 3-4 late radiation morbidity in the IC+CCRT group (44.8% vs. 70.8%, p=0.01). Five-year OS for patients with post-IC complete response (CR), partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD) sub-groups were 100%, 79.4% and 60%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Compared with CCRT alone, IC (TPF regimen)+CCRT did not improve OS or PFS in patients with NPC, but less grade 3-4 late toxicities were observed. Responsiveness of IC may provide additional prognostic information.