[Platelet aggregation inhibitors and vitamin K antagonists in stomatology and maxillo-facial surgery]

Anti-thrombin, anti-platelet and anti-vitamin K agents are common treatments given for the prevention of thrombotic or embolic events. In oral or maxillofacial surgery, the question is whether oral anticoagulants or anti-platelets should be discontinued or not: temporary interruption could limit the risk of bleeding, but would increase the risk of thrombosis, and inversely. The best risk/benefit ratio must be achieved, but in many cases anti-platelet agents or even anti-vitamin K agents can be continued. In case of "potentially hemorrhagic" oral surgery, anti-platelet agents should be interrupted about ten days before the intervention. Anti-vitamin K agents should be interrupted four days before surgery and if required, replaced by low-molecular weight heparin at preventive or curative doses. In the very large majority of patients however, surgery (avulsion for example) can be performed without interrupting anticoagulation. Data in the literature have demonstrated that despite the theoretical risk of hemorrhage, bleeding is minimal and can be easily controlled by local treatments; the risk of thrombotic or thromboembolic events after discontinuing anticoagulation is much greater. A close collaboration between the dentist, the stomatologist, and the clinician is required to determine whether anti-thrombosis prevention should be continued and whether the anticoagulation level is adapted to the thrombotic risk. Good surgical technique and local anti-hemorrhagic treatment are essential in oral surgery, particularly in patients taking anti-platelets or oral anticoagulants.

Tolerance of Iloprost and results of treatment of chronic severe lower limb ischaemia in diabetic patients. A retrospective study of 64 consecutive cases

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the tolerance and report obtained results with a stable prostacyclin analogue (iloprost) in diabetic patients with severe forms of permanent lower limb ischaemia.

METHODS

Sixty-four consecutive unselected patients, in stage III and IV of Leriche and Fontaine, turned down for vascular surgery after angiography and treated with iloprost during 28 days, were enrolled in this study. Patients were followed-up clinically (ischemic pain, trophic change, walking distance) and with transcutaneous oxymetry (D28). Long-term assessment (6 and 12 months) was expressed as rate of death, major amputation and of live patients with viable limbs and walking. There was no manifestation of intolerance to iloprost. Were considered as responders patients offering a lack or significant decrease in pain, a reduction of trophic lesions and improvement or recovery of walking.

RESULTS

Response at two months is lasting: 29 responders (45.3%) and 35 non-responders (54.7%). At 6 months and one year, we observed that 8 (12.5%) and 15 (24.1%) patients respectively had died; 19 (29.6%) and 22 (34.3%) patients underwent major amputation, but 41 (64%) and 34 (53.1%) patients were still alive with their limb and conservative walking. In responder group, at 6 months, 28 (96.5%) patients were alive without amputation for only 13 (37.1%) among non-responders. At one year, 79.3% of the responders and 31.4% of the non-responders were alive without amputation. A total loss of walking, a segmental amputation and a previous amputation of opposite limb were more often noted in no responder group. But no predictive factor was referred to TcPO(2) in particular. Results ware similar in the group of 136 non diabetic patients treated during the same period (67.9% alive with limb at 6 months).

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study, despite its limitations, underlines the clinical particularities of critical ischaemia in diabetics and the good tolerance to iloprost. This point allowed patients, in non-surgical chronic critical ischaemia, to avoid being confined to bed and to access to benefits of a early physiotherapy, in association with local treatment. However, no predictive criterion of long-term results could be established, except initial clinical severity and clinical change one month after treatment.