A double-blind trial of tamoxifen plus prednisolone versus tamoxifen plus placebo in postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer. A collaborative trial of the North Central Cancer Treatment Group and Mayo Clinic

This trial was conducted to determine if the reported superiority of tamoxifen (TAM) plus prednisolone (PRDLN) over TAM alone in postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer could be corroborated. A total of 326 patients were randomized on a double-blind trial to TAM (10 mg twice daily) plus placebo or TAM plus PRDLN (5 mg twice daily). Six patients (2%) were disqualified. Considering 256 patients with measurable or evaluable disease, objective responses were seen in 48 (38%) of 126 TAM patients and 61 (47%) of 130 TAM plus PRDLN patients (chi-square, P = 0.15). Considering all 320 evaluated patients, median time to disease progression was 11 months for TAM and 10 months for TAM plus PRDLN (log rank, P = 0.81), and median survival time was 35 and 32 months, respectively (P = 0.40). Covariate analyses showed no significant association between treatment and outcome. Weight gain and edema were significantly greater with TAM plus PRDLN. The addition of PRDLN to TAM is not advocated for the management of postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer.

A randomized trial of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone versus cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil, and prednisone in patients with metastatic breast cancer

Ninety-four patients were entered in a clinical trial assessing the clinical activity of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (CAP) versus a combination of cyclophosphamide. 5-Fluorouracil, and prednisone (CFP) in patients with advanced breast cancer. Objective response rates were comparable, 49% for CFP and 46% for CAP. There was no statistical difference between the duration of response of the two regimens or in time to progression. Most importantly, survival differences were not apparent. Both regimens were clinically tolerable and toxicities, for the most part, were comparable. Thus, no therapeutic advantage existed for either of these polychemotherapy regimens in patients with advanced breast cancer.

Combination hormonal therapy with tamoxifen plus fluoxymesterone versus tamoxifen alone in postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer. An updated analysis

A randomized trial was performed to determine if therapy with tamoxifen (TAM) plus fluoxymesterone (FLU) was more efficacious than TAM alone for postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer. Patients failing TAM could subsequently receive FLU. The dose of both drugs was 10 mg orally twice daily. Objective responses were seen in 50 of 119 (42%) TAM patients and 64 of 119 (54%) TAM plus FLU patients (two-sided P = 0.07). Time to disease progression was better for TAM plus FLU (medians: 11.6 versus 6.5 months; Cox model, P = 0.03). Duration of response and survival were similar in the two treatment arms. Among 97 patients with estrogen receptor (ER) of 10 or greater and 65 years of age or older, there were highly significant advantages for treatment with TAM plus FLU in both response rate and time to progression. Of particular note is that in this patient group TAM plus FLU showed a survival advantage (Cox model, P = 0.05). Although these data require confirmation in a prospective randomized trial, they suggest that there is a substantive therapeutic advantage for TAM plus FLU over TAM alone in elderly women with ER of 10 fmol or greater.

Weight change in women treated with adjuvant therapy or observed following mastectomy for node-positive breast cancer

Six hundred forty-six women with node-positive breast cancer from two prospective, randomized, adjuvant breast cancer trials were evaluated for changes in weight during and after receiving 60 weeks of chemotherapy, chemohormonal therapy, or observation. The median weight change in the 545 patients remaining on protocol at 60 weeks for observed postmenopausal patients was +1.8 kg, for treated postmenopausal patients +3.6 kg, and for treated premenopausal patients +5.9 kg (P less than .001). After a median follow-up of 6.6 years, premenopausal women who gained more than the median weight at 60 weeks had a risk of relapse 1.5 times greater (covariate P = .17) and a risk of death 1.6 times greater (covariate P = .04) than premenopausal women who had gained less than the median weight. In the postmenopausal patients, the trend for inferior relapse-free and overall survival in those who gained more than the median weight at 60 weeks was not significant (P = .05). We conclude that, relative to observation, adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with greater weight gain in node-positive, postmenopausal breast cancer patients; the amount of weight gain appears greater for premenopausal than postmenopausal women, and in premenopausal women, excessive weight gain may be associated with an increase in relapse and cancer-related deaths in the selected patients who show no evidence of recurrence during 60 weeks of adjuvant chemotherapy. This last point must be interpreted with caution because of the exploratory nature of the analyses.

Evaluation of trilostane plus hydrocortisone in women with metastatic breast cancer and prior hormonal therapy exposure

Trilostane, which causes a perturbation of adrenal steroidogenesis, was studied in combination with hydrocortisone in 32 women with progressive metastatic breast cancer. Trilostane was administered orally at a dosage level of 240 mg four times daily after escalation over the first 10 days from 60 mg four times daily. Hydrocortisone was given orally at doses of 10 mg at 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. and 20 mg at bedtime. Patients must have been postmenopausal (81%) or previously castrated (19%), had a response to the hormonal treatment just prior to study (81%) or a positive estrogen receptor at time of entry on study (41%), and a measurable indicator lesion. The number of prior hormonal therapies was 1 in 19 patients (59%), 2 in 12 patients (38%), and 3 in 1 patient (3%), respectively. Twelve patients (38%) achieved an objective response, and a 95% confidence interval for this result is from 21 to 56%. The median time to disease progression was 140 days, median duration of response was 278 days, and median survival was 556 days. Common toxicities included lethargy, lightheadedness, diarrhea, and abdominal discomfort. Eleven patients required a dosage reduction, usually because of gastrointestinal side effects, and one additional patient had the trilostane discontinued because of leukopenia. We conclude that the combination of trilostane plus hydrocortisone appears to have definite antitumor activity in women with metastatic breast cancer who have characteristics favorable for response to hormonal therapy.

Identification of putative nonfunctional steroid receptors in breast and endometrial cancer

A nuclear binding assay was developed for the purpose of having available a more predictive assay for hormone responsiveness in human cancers. The BNB assay identified specific and saturable steroid nuclear binding in human target tissues and human carcinomas. When the BNB assay was applied to a large set of breast and endometrial carcinomas, we speculate that nonfunctional receptors were detected in 20%-50% of the patients who were receptor-positive by the DCC assay. Lastly, as responsiveness to hormonal therapy in these cancer patients becomes known, the predictive value of the BNB assay can be established.

Randomized trial of doxorubicin alone or combined with vincristine and mitomycin C in women with metastatic breast cancer

A randomized clinical trial was performed to determine if combination therapy with doxorubicin, vincristine, and mitomycin C (DVM) was superior to doxorubicin alone in women with metastatic breast cancer for whom prior chemotherapy had failed. A total of 185 women were randomized to monthly courses of D (60 mg/m2, observation after 500 mg/m2); or D (50 mg/m2, maximum cumulative dose 500 mg/m2), V (1 mg/m2), and M (10 mg/m2, given every other cycle). Patients failing after D alone could receive V (1 mg weekly for 5 weeks, then 1.2 mg/m2 every 5 weeks) plus M (12 mg/m2 every 5 weeks). Objective responses were seen in 24 of 95 patients (25%) on D alone and 39 of 90 patients (43%) on DVM (two-sided p = 0.01). The time to disease progression distribution was significantly better for DVM (two-sided p = 0.02), but the magnitude of the advantage was small with the medians being 2.7 months for D and 4.2 months for DVM. There was no significant difference in survival between the two regimens. The degree of leukopenia was greater for DVM both in terms of median white blood cell nadir (1,300/microL versus 1,700/microL) and percentage of patients with a nadir less than 1,000/microL (33% versus 16%). A total of 45 patients received VM following D alone, and only seven (16%) achieved an objective response. We conclude that, despite a significantly higher response rate and longer time to progression, the degree of clinical benefit is not sufficient to recommend the combination of DVM over D alone as second-line therapy for women with metastatic breast cancer. The level of efficacy seen with VM as tertiary therapy is low and is of such a magnitude to suggest that V adds little but toxicity to M.

Principles of therapy in advanced breast cancer

Advanced breast cancer represents a common clinical problem faced by medical oncologists, internists, surgeons, and radiation oncologists. The medical oncologist or internist is usually the patient's primary physician and is responsible for coordinating the multiple disciplines to optimize the therapeutic management. In the case of locally advanced (stage III) breast cancer, there are far fewer prospective clinical trials on which to base management decisions than are available in the metastatic disease setting. The primary cancer care physician's responsibility is particularly great for coordination of the multidisciplinary approach and integration of medical oncology, radiation oncology, and surgical treatment modalities, however. In the case of metastatic breast cancer, an understanding of the importance of certain clinical factors (that is, hormonal receptors, performance score, disease-free interval, sites and extent of metastasis, and tempo of disease) is crucial to the development of the therapeutic plan in the individual patient. Although entry on a state-of-the-art clinical trial is the appropriate goal, this is not always possible, and an understanding of therapeutic options is essential. Palliation is the key word in the management of metastatic breast cancer, and hormonal therapy is generally the most appropriate course unless the patient is not a hormonal candidate because of sites, extent, or tempo of disease, or because of the known lack of hormonal receptors. Of particular importance is attention to sites of bone metastasis where appropriate radiation therapy and/or surgical intervention can relieve pain or prevent a devastating fracture with resultant loss of mobility and decrease in quality of life.

Evaluation of menogaril in patients with metastatic sarcomas and no prior chemotherapy exposure

Menogaril, an anthracycline analog of nogalamycin, is reported to have greater cytotoxicity against certain malignant cell lines and less cardiotoxicity in rabbits than doxorubicin. To evaluate the possible therapeutic benefit of this drug, we studied menogaril in 21 patients with metastatic sarcomas who had received no prior chemotherapy. Menogaril was administered intravenously over 1 h every 3-4 weeks at a dose of 200 mg/m2 in 500 ml of 5% dextrose in water. One patient experienced a partial regression of pulmonary metastases from malignant fibrous histiocytoma of bone (response rate of 5% with 95% confidence interval of 0.1-23.8%). Two additional patients experienced minor reductions in tumor size. The remaining 18 patients had no improvement from menogaril. The median time to disease progression was 7 weeks in all patients treated. Toxicity was acceptable, consisting primarily of leukopenia with 12 patients (57%) and 19 patients (90%) developing nadir leukocyte counts less than 2000 and 3000/microL, respectively. Cardiac toxicity was not encountered; however, only seven patients received greater than or equal to 3 cycles of menogaril. We conclude that menogaril does not appear to be useful at this dose and schedule in the treatment of metastatic sarcomas despite the use of near maximal doses in patients with no prior chemotherapy exposure.

Randomized clinical trial of CFP versus CMFP in women with metastatic breast cancer

A randomized trial was performed to determine relative efficacy and toxicity of two first-line combination chemotherapy regimens in women with metastatic breast cancer: CFP (cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil, prednisone) and CMFP (cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil, methotrexate, prednisone). Both regimens have reported efficacy in this setting but differ in dosages and scheduling of the agents they have in common. Three hundred thirty-six women with no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease were eligible and evaluable, and 309 had either measurable or evaluable disease and were assessable for objective response. Responses were seen in 65 of 153 (42%) on CFP and 83 of 156 (53%) on CMFP (two-sided P = 0.06). Median durations of response were 7.1 months for CFP and 8.5 months for CMFP (log-rank, two-sided P = 0.67). Considering all 336 patients, the median times to disease progression were 4.7 months for CFP and 6.2 months for CMFP (log-rank P = 0.31) and median survivals were 15.2 and 14.9 months, respectively (log-rank P = 0.88). Covariate analysis did not alter these findings. Median leukocyte nadirs were 1800 for CFP and 1500 for CMFP, with 22% and 21%, respectively, having nadirs less than 1000/microliters. Emesis was more frequent on CFP (49%) than on CMFP (26%) but was severe in only 7% and 5%, respectively. It is concluded that despite a higher response rate on CMFP and some differences in toxicities including a higher reported incidence of emesis on CFP, there was no substantial difference in efficacy or tolerability between the two regimens.

Randomized trial to evaluate the addition of tamoxifen to cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil, prednisone adjuvant therapy in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer

A randomized clinical trial was performed to determine if the addition of hormonal therapy with tamoxifen to a combination chemotherapy regimen was superior to the chemotherapy alone for adjuvant treatment of premenopausal women after mastectomy for node-positive breast cancer. The chemotherapy regimen utilized consisted of cyclophosphamide (C), 5-fluorouracil (F), and prednisone (P), and the doses employed were: C, 150 mg/m2 IV days 1 to 5; F, 300 mg/m2 IV days 1 to 5; and P, 10 mg orally three times daily on days 1 to 7. A total of ten courses of therapy, given every 6 weeks, was planned. Tamoxifen (T) was given at a dose of 10 mg twice daily and was stopped 6 weeks after the last course of CFP. Four hundred patients are fully eligible and evaluable. With a median observation time of 5.3 years, the proportion of recurrences on each arm were: CFP, 95 of 202 (47%); CFPT, 77 of 198 (39%). The relapse-free survival distribution for CFPT was superior to that for CFP, at a borderline level of significance (two-sided P = 0.06). When significant prognostic factors were considered in covariate analysis, CFPT was not significantly better than CFP (P = 0.43). This marked change in level was due to imbalance in several factors not considered in stratification. Currently, 31% of CFP and 25% of CFPT patients have died, and although there is a slight separation of the survival curves in favor of CFPT, the difference is not significant (P = 0.21). Analysis within receptor subsets also showed no significant advantage for the addition of tamoxifen. This study does not establish a significant advantage for the concurrent administration of tamoxifen with the CFP regimen. It does, however, clearly demonstrate the importance of examination of clinically important prognostic factors, even those not utilized in stratification, and consideration of these factors in covariate analysis if imbalances are present.

A prospective, randomized controlled trial of megestrol acetate among high-risk patients with resected malignant melanoma

In light of some evidence that hormonal factors may impact on malignant melanoma, we performed a randomized trial of megestrol acetate versus observation among 67 patients with high-risk resected stage I or stage II (nodal) malignant melanoma. Following stratification by relevant prognostic factors, we observed a statistical significance in survival advantage for megestrol acetate that approached 7.6 versus 2.6 years, median survival; two-sided log rank p = 0.06. Disease-free survival was also greater for patients who received this hormonal therapy (3.4 versus 1.1 years, median disease-free survival), but the difference was not statistically significant (two-sided log rank p = 0.20). The most noteworthy side effects were weight gain (median 6-month gain of 8.2 kg) and impotence. Fully recognizing the hazards of limited sample analyses and the need for confirmatory trials, our findings suggest a possible role for megestrol acetate as adjuvant therapy for selected patients with malignant melanoma.

Results of salvage hormonal therapy and salvage chemotherapy in women failing adjuvant chemotherapy after mastectomy for breast cancer

We have evaluated the results of salvage systemic therapy in 257 patients with breast cancer recurrent after surgical adjuvant treatment with cyclophosphamide, fluorouracil, and prednisone (CFP) with or without tamoxifen. The overall objective response rate to salvage hormonal therapy was 29% (47 responses in 161 patients) and to salvage chemotherapy was 28% (43 responses in 156 patients). Response rates to salvage chemotherapy were similar whether or not prior salvage hormonal therapy or local modalities had been administered. Retreatment with CFP as a salvage chemotherapy yielded responses in 11 of 44 patients (25%). Response rates were similar for patients who began salvage CFP less than or equal to 12 months or greater than 12 months after completion of adjuvant CFP. We conclude that when this unselected population of patients failing adjuvant CFP is considered, 1) response rates to salvage chemotherapy were low regardless of whether or not prior salvage hormonal or local therapies were given, 2) repeating adjuvant chemotherapy (CFP) following relapse produced a low response rate, and 3) response rates to salvage hormonal therapy were low, but on the order of those observed in patients with advanced disease unselected by estrogen receptor status who are treated with first line hormonal maneuvers.

Randomized trial of observation versus adjuvant therapy with cyclophosphamide, fluorouracil, prednisone with or without tamoxifen following mastectomy in postmenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer

Following mastectomy for node-positive breast cancer, 261 postmenopausal women were randomized to observation or adjuvant treatment with cyclophosphamide, fluorouracil, prednisone (CFP) alone or combined with tamoxifen (T). Doses used were: C, 150 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) days 1 to 5; F, 300 mg/m2 IV days 1 to 5; P, 10 mg by mouth 3 times daily on days 1 to 7; and T, 10 mg by mouth 2 times daily. A total of ten courses of treatment, administered every 6 weeks, was planned and T was stopped 6 weeks after the last course of CFP. Two hundred thirty-four patients were fully eligible and evaluable. With a median observation time slightly in excess of 5 years, the proportion of recurrences on each arm were: CFP, 29 of 75 (39%); CFPT, 29 of 71 (41%); and observation, 50 of 88 (57%). Relapse-free survival distributions for both CFP and CFPT were superior to observation (both two-sided P = .01). Considering prognostic factors in covariate analysis revealed two-sided P = .0006 for CFP v observation and P = .0003 for CFPT v observation. No substantial difference was identified between CFP and CFPT. Survival data are not yet mature with 31% dead; and, although slight separations of the curves exist in favor of the treatment arms, no significant differences in survival have been seen. Both adjuvant therapy programs are well tolerated and there were no treatment-related deaths. Further maturation of the data is required to determine if the advantages in relapse-free survival will be translated into any overall survival benefit which must be considered the goal of primary interest.

A design for phase II testing of anticancer agents within a phase III clinical trial

A design for testing new anticancer agents is proposed such that the initial testing of new agents (phase II trials) is included within the framework of a comparative clinical trial (phase III). Randomization between phase II trials and the treatment groups of the phase III trial enforces consistency of patient selection and evaluation of response criteria. Patients who progress on the phase II trials of the new agents are randomized to one of the treatments of the phase III trial. Design issues, such as sample size and power, and analysis of the proposed design, are discussed. Advantages and disadvantages of the design are illustrated by sample size calculations for a current clinical trial in advanced breast cancer.

Randomized clinical trial of tamoxifen alone or combined with fluoxymesterone in postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer

A randomized clinical trial was performed to determine if combination hormonal therapy with tamoxifen (TAM) and fluoxymesterone (FLU) was more efficacious than TAM alone for the treatment of postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer. Patients failing TAM could subsequently receive FLU. The dose of both drugs was 10 mg orally twice daily. Objective responses were seen in 50 of 119 TAM patients (42%) and 63 of 119 TAM plus FLU patients (53%) (one-sided P = .05). Time to disease progression distributions were better for TAM plus FLU (median, 350 days v 199 days), but the log rank test only approached statistical significance (one-sided P = .07). Duration of response and survival distributions were similar between the two treatment arms. Toxicities, in terms of androgenic side effects, were greater on the TAM plus FLU regimen. Fifty-two patients are evaluable for response with FLU following TAM and 21 (40%) have achieved a response. We conclude that the advantages in terms of response rate and time to progression observed with TAM plus FLU probably represent a biological effect, but are not of sufficient magnitude to justify the routine clinical use of this combination given the lack of survival advantage and side effects encountered.

Microassay for nuclear binding of steroid receptors with use of intact cells from small samples of avian and human tissue

A micro version of a nuclear binding assay to assess the biological activity of receptors for steroid hormones was developed for application to small (needle) biopsies of human tumors for the purpose of predicting responses to steroid therapy. This easier assay requires 10-fold less tissue than the original nuclear binding assay described for progesterone receptors in the avian oviduct, endometrium, and endometrial carcinomas (Spelsberg TC, et al., Endocrinology 1987;121:631). We describe the application of this micro assay to normal avian oviduct and cancers of the human breast, and we demonstrate a tissue specificity and saturation of nuclear binding. The micro assay reliably measured as little as 0.5 mg equivalents of tissue per assay tube. Results for breast tumors determined to be estrogen-receptor-positive by the standard dextran-coated charcoal method were also determined with this nuclear binding assay. As described previously for progesterone receptors in endometrial carcinomas, some receptor-positive breast biopsies displayed negligible capacity for nuclear binding. Therefore, with the present assay we have identified nonfunctional receptors in these biopsies, which may be useful for accurate prediction of patients' responses to therapy with hormones.

Microassay for nuclear binding of steroid receptors with use of intact cells from small samples of avian and human tissue

A micro version of a nuclear binding assay to assess the biological activity of receptors for steroid hormones was developed for application to small (needle) biopsies of human tumors for the purpose of predicting responses to steroid therapy. This easier assay requires 10-fold less tissue than the original nuclear binding assay described for progesterone receptors in the avian oviduct, endometrium, and endometrial carcinomas (Spelsberg TC, et al., Endocrinology 1987;121:631). We describe the application of this micro assay to normal avian oviduct and cancers of the human breast, and we demonstrate a tissue specificity and saturation of nuclear binding. The micro assay reliably measured as little as 0.5 mg equivalents of tissue per assay tube. Results for breast tumors determined to be estrogen-receptor-positive by the standard dextran-coated charcoal method were also determined with this nuclear binding assay. As described previously for progesterone receptors in endometrial carcinomas, some receptor-positive breast biopsies displayed negligible capacity for nuclear binding. Therefore, with the present assay we have identified nonfunctional receptors in these biopsies, which may be useful for accurate prediction of patients' responses to therapy with hormones.

The effect on survival of initial chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer: polychemotherapy versus single drug

Since current clinical trials assessing new agents occur in patients with advanced breast cancer having failed one and sometimes many polychemotherapy programs, these new agents may not be given a fair trial. In an effort to assess the possibility of using an alternative study design, we analyzed older clinical trials that used a controlled study design, randomizing between a single new drug and an established polychemotherapy program with a cross-over design upon failure. We were interested in noting that the pooled data did display a slight survival advantage (median 3.7 months) for the group receiving polychemotherapy as initial therapy. The survival distributions were clearly not significant using the log rank test, but did approach significance using the Smirnov. It is apparent that, while some slight advantage does occur for that group of patients receiving initial polychemotherapy, the magnitude of this effect is not great and is short in duration. Serious consideration should be given to the assessment of new agents as first-line therapy, particularly should they have a unique mode of action or lessened morbidities or toxicities.

Pericardial effusion in women with breast cancer

Ninety patients with a history of breast cancer and pericardial effusion detected on echocardiography were identified and divided on a clinical basis into three groups. Group 1 consisted of 20 patients who had progressive metastatic breast cancer and echocardiography performed on a routine basis as a part of a clinical trial involving 38 patients. All 20 had small unexpected effusions, and only one patient developed symptomatic malignant pericardial disease late in her clinical course. Group 2 consisted of 32 patients who were without evidence of metastatic disease at the time of positive echocardiography and the etiology was considered benign in all patients. Six patients required pericardiectomy, five for severe radiation induced pericarditis and one for amyloid. No patient developed proven or suspected malignant pericardial disease. Group 3 comprised 38 patients who had known metastatic disease outside the pericardium at the time of positive echocardiography. Nineteen patients in Group 3 had histologically proven malignant involvement during life or at autopsy, and five more had suspected malignant pericardial disease. Ten patients initially were treated with pericardiectomy and 28 patients were managed with systemic therapy alone (24 patients) or with pericardiocentesis (four patients). Among the 12 patients with malignant effusion treated without surgery, proven local progression of pericardial disease occurred in six, with sudden death in two of those patients. No patient treated initially with surgery suffered progression of her pericardial disease. It was concluded that: small, clinically unsuspected pericardial effusions appear to be relatively common in women with metastatic breast cancer; no patient with clinical pericardial disease confirmed on echocardiography and no evidence of metastatic breast cancer developed malignant pericardial involvement; 50% of patients with known metastatic disease and a clinically apparent pericardial effusion had malignant pericardial disease; and nonsurgical therapy in patients with histologically proven or clinically suspected malignant pericardial effusion was associated with a high incidence of progressive pericardial disease.

A nuclear binding assay to assess the biological activity of steroid receptors in isolated animal and human tissues

This paper describes a nuclear binding assay (NB assay) which measures not only the presence of a steroid receptor in a tissue, but also the quantity of that receptor which is biologically active or functional, i.e. able to bind to nuclear acceptor sites. The assay involves the isolation viable cells from tissues and their incubation with an excess of radiolabeled steroid to encourage the activation and nuclear binding of all cellular receptors. The nuclei are isolated under conditions that remove unactivated (unbound) steroid-receptor complexes. This NB assay demonstrates, in both animal and human steroid target tissues, a saturable, tissue- and steroid-specific, and temperature- and time-dependent nuclear binding of radiolabeled steroids. These properties support a receptor-dependent nuclear binding of steroids. This assay is reproducible and requires relatively small amounts of tissue. The patterns of nuclear binding of the progesterone receptor, achieved with the assay in the avian oviduct model system, are shown to correlate with the nuclear binding of progesterone in vivo, the ability of the steroid to alter transcription, and the expression of a specific gene product, the protein avidin. The assay has been used to identify the existence of nonfunctional steroid receptors in endometrial and breast carcinomas. Therefore, this NB assay combined with the standard charcoal/hydroxylapatite methods of quantitating total cellular receptors should provide a means of assessing changes in the regulation of the biological activity of steroid receptors. Further, the assay should be useful to assess the ability of steroid analogs to properly activate their respective receptors for subsequent nuclear binding.

Pericardial effusion in women with breast cancer

Ninety patients with a history of breast cancer and pericardial effusion detected on echocardiography were identified and divided on a clinical basis into three groups. Group 1 consisted of 20 patients who had progressive metastatic breast cancer and echocardiography performed on a routine basis as a part of a clinical trial involving 38 patients. All 20 had small unexpected effusions, and only one patient developed symptomatic malignant pericardial disease late in her clinical course. Group 2 consisted of 32 patients who were without evidence of metastatic disease at the time of positive echocardiography and the etiology was considered benign in all patients. Six patients required pericardiectomy, five for severe radiation induced pericarditis and one for amyloid. No patient developed proven or suspected malignant pericardial disease. Group 3 comprised 38 patients who had known metastatic disease outside the pericardium at the time of positive echocardiography. Nineteen patients in Group 3 had histologically proven malignant involvement during life or at autopsy, and five more had suspected malignant pericardial disease. Ten patients initially were treated with pericardiectomy and 28 patients were managed with systemic therapy alone (24 patients) or with pericardiocentesis (four patients). Among the 12 patients with malignant effusion treated without surgery, proven local progression of pericardial disease occurred in six, with sudden death in two of those patients. No patient treated initially with surgery suffered progression of her pericardial disease. It was concluded that: small, clinically unsuspected pericardial effusions appear to be relatively common in women with metastatic breast cancer; no patient with clinical pericardial disease confirmed on echocardiography and no evidence of metastatic breast cancer developed malignant pericardial involvement; 50% of patients with known metastatic disease and a clinically apparent pericardial effusion had malignant pericardial disease; and nonsurgical therapy in patients with histologically proven or clinically suspected malignant pericardial effusion was associated with a high incidence of progressive pericardial disease.

Effect of body weight on the pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide in breast cancer patients

Cyclophosphamide pharmacokinetics have been studied in 16 female patients with advanced breast cancer. The group included 7 patients who were greater than 20%, less than or equal to 30% over ideal body weight and 5 patients who were greater than 30% over ideal body weight. Cyclophosphamide plasma elimination half-lives ranged between 152 and 984 min (mean 457 min), the apparent volume of distribution between 19.1 and 62.3 1 (mean 36.1 1), and plasma clearance between 25.9 and 166.6 ml/min (mean 69.5 ml/min). There was a significant positive correlation (r = 0.624, P = 0.010) between body weight and plasma elimination half-life, and a significant negative correlation between body weight and cyclophosphamide clearance when normalized to body surface area (r = 0.578, P = 0.019) or normalized to ideal body weight (r = 0.531, P = 0.0345). The apparent volume of distribution did not correlate with body weight. The results show that cyclophosphamide disposition is altered in patients with increased body weight.