Increased Incidence of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Eye After Kidney Transplantation

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the eye occurs at substantially increased rates in individuals with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, but it has not been reported in individuals with iatrogenic or congenital immune deficiency. In a national, population-based cohort of 10,180 renal transplantation patients from Australia with 86,898 person-years of follow-up, we ascertained primary incident cancers diagnosed in 1982-2003 by record linkage between the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry and the Australian National Cancer Statistics Clearing House. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) of cancer were calculated using age-, sex-, calendar year-, and state/territory-specific population cancer incidence rates. Statistical tests were two-sided. Five patients were diagnosed with ocular SCC after kidney transplantation (0.26 were expected), and the incidence was increased 20-fold (SIR = 19.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 6.3 to 45.5). Compared with the entire cohort, the five patients with ocular SCC after transplantation were more likely to have resided in the subtropical state of Queensland (60% versus 17%, P = .04), to have had end-stage kidney disease as a result of glomerulonephritis (100% versus 46%, P = .02), and to have a history of cutaneous SCC (100% versus 29%, P = .002). The increased incidence of ocular SCC after kidney transplantation and after HIV infection strongly suggests that this neoplasm is an immune deficiency-associated cancer. Our data also support an interaction between immune suppression and sun exposure in the development of ocular SCC after kidney transplantation.

Use of proliferation signal inhibitors in the management of post-transplant malignancies--clinical guidance

Increasing success in renal transplantation and longer patient survival has meant that post-transplant malignancies are having an increasing impact on long-term graft and patient survival. Choice of the immunosuppressive agents provides one of the controllable risk factors for the development of malignancies in this population. Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are associated with an increased incidence of cancers, whereas the proliferation signal inhibitors (PSIs), everolimus and sirolimus have demonstrated anti-oncogenic effects in pre-clinical models and are currently being investigated as anti-cancer agents in clinical trials. There is increasing evidence demonstrating a lower incidence of post-transplant malignancies in renal transplant recipients receiving PSI-based immunosuppression compared with those receiving CNIs. Conversion from CNIs to PSIs has been shown to lead to the regression of Kaposi's sarcoma in renal transplant recipients and is now part of accepted standard care for this tumour in this setting. The anti-cancer properties of PSI-based regimens have the potential to combine the dual benefits of immunosuppression without the use of CNIs and the direct anti-oncogenic effects through their inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signalling pathway. In the absence of formal clinical trial evidence on the best way to use PSIs in this setting, a workshop was held to provide practical guidance on immunosuppressive strategies in the context of malignancy, given the current state of knowledge.

Protocol biopsies in renal transplantation: insights into patient management and pathogenesis

A 1-day symposium on the application of protocol biopsies in renal transplantation was held in Boston, 21 July 2006. Representatives from centers with extensive experience in the use of protocol biopsies for routine patient care and research reported results on the pathological findings and their value in patient management. The consensus was that protocol biopsies, in experienced hands, are a safe and valuable means of detecting subclinical disease that can benefit from modification of therapy. Furthermore, molecular studies reveal evidence of activity or progression not readily appreciated by histological techniques. Wider application is expected in multicenter clinical trials to predict and validate outcomes. The principal barrier to wider use of protocol biopsies is knowledge of the benefits of intervention.

Mycophenolate mofetil is associated with altered expression of chronic renal transplant histology

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) reduces acute rejection in controlled trials of kidney transplantation and is associated with better registry graft survival. Recent experimental studies have demonstrated additional antifibrotic properties of MMF, however, human histological data are lacking. We evaluated sequential prospective protocol kidney biopsies from two historical cohorts treated with cyclosporine (CSA)-based triple therapy including prednisolone and either MMF (n = 25) or azathioprine (AZA, n = 25). Biopsies (n = 360) were taken from euglycemic kidney-pancreas transplant recipients. Histology was independently assessed by the Banff schema and electron microscopic morphometry. MMF reduced acute rejection and OKT3 use (p < 0.05) compared with AZA. MMF therapy was associated with limited chronic interstitial fibrosis, striped fibrosis and periglomerular fibrosis (p < 0.05-0.001), mesangial matrix accumulation (p < 0.01), chronic glomerulopathy scores (p < 0.05) and glomerulosclerosis (p < 0.05). MMF was associated with delayed expression of CSA nephrotoxicity, reduced arteriolar hyalinosis, striped fibrosis and tubular microcalcification (p < 0.05-0.001). The beneficial effects of MMF remained in recipients without acute rejection. Retrospective analysis shows that MMF therapy was associated with substantially reduced fibrosis in the glomerular, microvascular and interstitial compartments, and a delayed expression of CSA nephrotoxicity. These outcomes may be due to a limitation of immune-mediated injury and suggest a direct effect of reduced fibrogenesis.

Cancer incidence before and after kidney transplantation

CONTEXT

Immune suppression after organ transplantation is associated with a markedly increased risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer and a few virus-associated cancers. Although it is generally accepted that other cancers do not occur at increased rates, there have been few long-term population-based cohort studies performed.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the incidence of cancer in patients receiving immune suppression after kidney transplantation with incidence in the same population in 2 periods before receipt of immune suppression: during dialysis and during end-stage kidney disease before renal replacement therapy (RRT).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A population-based cohort study of 28,855 patients with end-stage kidney disease who received RRT, with 273,407 person-years of follow-up. Incident cancers (1982-2003) were ascertained by record linkage between the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry and the Australian National Cancer Statistics Clearing House.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) of cancer, using age-specific, sex-specific, calendar year-specific, and state/territory-specific population cancer incidence rates.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of cancer, excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer and those cancers known to frequently cause end-stage kidney disease, was markedly increased after transplantation (n = 1236; SIR, 3.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.09-3.46). In contrast, cancer incidence was only slightly increased during dialysis (n = 870; SIR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.27-1.45) and before RRT (n = 689; SIR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.08-1.25). After transplantation, cancer occurred at significantly increased incidence at 25 sites, and risk exceeded 3-fold at 18 of these sites. Most of these cancers were of known or suspected viral etiology.

CONCLUSIONS

Kidney transplantation is associated with a marked increase in cancer risk at a wide variety of sites. Because SIRs for most types of cancer were not increased before transplantation, immune suppression may be responsible for the increased risk. These data suggest a broader than previously appreciated role of the interaction between the immune system and common viral infections in the etiology of cancer.

The significance of subclinical rejection and the value of protocol biopsies

Subclinical rejection (SCR) is diagnosed by protocol histology with a maximal prevalence occurring early after transplantation, falling to low levels by 1 year. Needle-core biopsy is safe, and the histology obtained fairly reflects subclinical immune activity. Several studies have consistently shown that SCR is associated with chronic tubulointerstitial damage, subsequent renal dysfunction and reduced graft survival. SCR is effectively treated by pulse corticosteroid therapy, although increased baseline immunosuppression may be necessary. A single randomized clinical trial of biopsy and corticosteroid therapy demonstrated significantly improved early structural and functional outcomes, and a (nonsignificant) 17% risk reduction in 4-year graft survival. Three possible approaches include: no protocol biopsies (usually accompanied by powerful immunosuppression); biopsies only in high-risk recipients (who may be difficult to reliably predict) or universal screening protocol biopsy (comprehensive but limited by cost and resource utilization). The appropriate screening methodology for a transplant unit is both a clinical and an economic decision; influenced by the SCR prevalence and potential gains of treatment, against costs and resource utilization. Further trials to quantify the cost-benefit balance in a typical, heterogeneous recipient population using modern immunosuppression are required.

Treatment of subclinical rejection diagnosed by protocol biopsy of kidney transplants

BACKGROUND

Subclinical rejection (SCR) causes chronic allograft damage, which may be prevented by antirejection therapy.

METHODS

A pilot study of the effect of routine treatment of SCR was performed in 88 recipients of either a kidney (n=59) or combined kidney-pancreas transplant (n=29) undergoing protocol biopsy (PBX) surveillance at 1 and 3 months, using calcineurin inhibitors, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroid therapy.

RESULTS

SCR was seen in 46.6% (41/88 patients), as 30 borderline and 11 acute SCR. From 279 transplant biopsies, the prevalence of SCR was 25% (22/88) at 1 month, 10.2% (9/88) at 3 months, and 8.3% (2/24) at 12 months PBX. Treatment included bolus intravenous or oral corticosteroids (n=20) and augmented immunosuppression, either by conversion to tacrolimus (n=6) or increased doses of maintenance therapy (n=14), whereas OKT3 was used in one case of subclinical vascular rejection. Borderline episodes were not treated in 12 patients. In biopsies taken to assess therapeutic response, persistent SCR was present in 46.1% (6/13). Treatment of SCR at 1 month was followed by lower acute Banff sum scores at 3 months PBX (P<0.01-0.0001). Early chronic damage was already present in the 1 month PBX, associated with SCR (P<0.0005 versus without SCR), although by 3 months these differences were lost. Rates of opportunistic infections and BK nephropathy were not increased by SCR treatment.

CONCLUSION

Early chronic allograft damage was associated with SCR and therapy appeared to ameliorate further immune-mediated injury, although the efficacy of corticosteroids alone may be inadequate. A controlled trial of therapy for SCR is warranted.

The global alliance for transplantation

In 2002, The Transplantation Society proposed the creation of a Global Alliance for Transplantation, with the purpose of reducing the existing disparity regarding transplantation activities across the globe. This alliance should include major international scientific societies, international governmental organizations, and pharmaceutical companies. Consultations with each of these parties have taken place during the past 18 months and three Strategic Programs have been initiated: (1) the collection of information on transplantation; (2) the expansion of education in transplantation; and (3) the development of professional guidelines for organ donation and transplantation.

Cytokine release of mononuclear leukocytes (PBMC) after contact to a carbonated calcium phosphate bone cement

Human leukocytes (peripheral blood mononuclear cells, PBMC) were overlaid on calcium phosphate bone cement (CBC, Norian SRS) and allowed to settle for 1 h under cell culture conditions. Subsequently, the cells were either left unstimulated (i.e. sham stimulation using cell culture medium), or stimulated with toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 (TSST-1, 10 ng/mL), staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB, 10 ng/mL), or concanavalin A (ConA, 2 microg/mL) for further 24 h using cell culture conditions. Supernatants were then analyzed for cytokine content (interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, IL-1ra; IL-2; IL-6; IL-10; IL-12) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. While the spontaneous generation of cytokines was not influenced, the IL-2 release from stimulated PBMC was significantly decreased in contrast to other analyzed cytokines after contact to the curing CBC compared to control incubations without CBC. This decrease in IL-2 release was not due to known inhibitors of IL-2 synthesis platelet factor-4 (PF-4), IL-10, TGF-beta, or elevated calcium ion concentrations.

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (sirolimus and everolimus) for primary immunosuppression of kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR-I) have a novel mode of action but uncertain clinical role. We performed a systematic review of randomized trials where immunosuppressive regimens containing TOR-I were compared with other regimens as initial therapy for kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

Databases (inception, June 2005) and conference proceedings (1996-2005) were searched. Two independent reviewers assessed trials for eligibility and quality. Results at 1 year, are expressed as relative risk (RR), where values<1 favor TOR-I, or lower dose of TOR-I, and for continuous outcomes are expressed as weighted mean difference (WMD), both expressed with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Thirty-three trials (142 reports) were included (27 trials of sirolimus, 5 of everolimus, and 1 of head-to-head comparison). When TOR-I replaced calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) (8 trials with 750 participants), there was no difference in acute rejection (RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.74-1.44), but serum creatinine was lower (WMD, -18.31 micromol/L; 95% CI, -30.96 to -5.67) and bone marrow more suppressed (leukopenia: RR 2.02; 95% CI, 1.12-3.66; thrombocytopenia: RR, 6.97; 95% CI, 2.97-16.36; and anaemia: RR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.27-2.20). When TOR-I replaced antimetabolites (11 trials with 3966 participants), acute rejection and cytomegalovirus infection (CMV) were reduced (RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71-0.99; RR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.37-0.65, respectively), but hypercholesterolemia was increased (RR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.32-2.06). When low- was compared with high-dose TOR-I, with equal CNI dose (10 trials with 3,175 participants), rejection was increased (RR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.06-1.43) but calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) higher (WMD, 4.27 mL/min; 95% CI, 1.12-7.41), and when lower-dose TOR-I and standard-dose CNI were compared with higher-dose TOR-I and reduced CNI, acute rejection was reduced (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.52-0.88), but calculated GFR was also reduced (WMD, -9.46 mL/min; 95% CI, -12.16 to -6.76). There was no significant difference in mortality, graft loss, or malignancy risk for TOR-I in any comparison.

CONCLUSIONS

TOR-I have been evaluated in four different primary immunosuppressive algorithms: as replacement for CNI and antimetabolites, in combination with CNI at low and high doses, and with a variable dose of CNI. Generally, surrogate endpoints for graft survival favor TOR-I (lower risk of acute rejection and higher GFR), and surrogate endpoints for patient outcomes are worsened by TOR-I (bone marrow suppression and lipid disturbance). Long-term hard-endpoint data from methodologically robust randomized trials are still required.

Chronic allograft nephropathy: current concepts and future directions

The paradigm that chronic rejection causes all progressive late allograft failure has been replaced by a hypothesis of cumulative damage, where a series of time-dependent immune and nonimmune mechanisms injure the kidney and lead to chronic interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, representing a final common pathway of injury and its consequent fibrotic healing response. Allograft damage is common, progressive, time-dependent, clinically important and modified by immunosuppression. Early after transplantation, tubulointerstitial damage is predominantly related to ischemia reperfusion injury, acute tubular necrosis, acute and subclinical rejection and/or calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity, superimposed on preexisting donor disease. Later, cellular inflammation lessens and is replaced by microvascular and glomerular injury from calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity, hypertension, immune-mediated fibrointimal vascular hyperplasia, transplant glomerulopathy and capillary injury, polyoma virus and/or recurrent glomerulonephritis. Additional mechanisms of injury include internal architectural disruption of the kidney, cortical ischemia, persistent chronic inflammation, replicative senescence, cytokine excess and fibrosis induced by epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Current understanding of the etiology, pathophysiology and evolution of pathological changes are detailed. An approach to histological assessment of the individual failing graft are presented and a series of postulates are defined for future studies of chronic allograft nephropathy.

Polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies for treating acute rejection episodes in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Registry data shows that between 15-35% kidney recipients will undergo treatment for at least one episode of acute rejection within the first post transplant year. Treatment options include pulsed steroid therapy, the use of an antibody preparation, the alteration of background immunosuppression, or combinations of these options. In 2002, in the US, 61.4% patients with an acute rejection episode received steroids, 20.4% received an antibody preparation and 18.2% received both.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the benefits and harms of mono- or polyclonal antibodies (Ab) used to treat acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (in The Cochrane Library, issue 2, 2005), MEDLINE (1966-June 2005), EMBASE (1980-June 2005), and the specialised register of the Cochrane Renal Group (June 2005).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in all languages comparing all mono- and polyclonal antibody preparations, given in combination with any other immunosuppressive agents, for the treatment of acute graft rejection, when compared to any other treatment for acute rejection.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed trials for eligibility and quality, and extracted data. Results are expressed as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty one trials (49 reports, 1387 patients) were identified. Trials were generally small, incompletely reported, especially for potential harms, and did not define outcome measures adequately. Fourteen trials (965 patients) compared therapies for first rejection episodes. Ab was better than steroid in reversing rejection (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.87) and preventing graft loss (death censored RR 0.74, CI 0.58 to 0.95) but there was no difference in preventing subsequent rejection or death at one year. Seven trials (422 patients) investigated Ab treatment of steroid-resistant rejection. There was no benefit of muromonab-CD3 over ATG or ALG in either reversing rejection, preventing subsequent rejection, preventing graft loss or death.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In reversing first rejection, any antibody is better than steroid and also prevents graft loss, but subsequent rejection and patient survival are not significantly different. In reversing steroid-resistant rejection the effects of different antibodies are also not significantly different. Given the clinical problem caused by acute rejection, data are very sparse, and clinically important differences in outcomes between widely used interventions have not been excluded. Standardised reproducible outcome criteria are needed.

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR-I; sirolimus and everolimus) for primary immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR-I) (sirolimus, everolimus) are immunosuppressive agents with a novel mode of action but an uncertain clinical role.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the benefits and harms of immunosuppressive regimens containing TOR-I when compared to other regimens as initial therapy for kidney transplant recipients.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (in The Cochrane Library, issue 2, 2005), MEDLINE (1966-June 2005), EMBASE (1980-June 2005), the specialised register of the Cochrane Renal Group (June 2005)., and contacted authors and pharmaceutical companies to identify relevant studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs where drug regimens containing TOR-I were compared to alternative drug regimens in the immediate post-transplant period were included, without age restriction, dosage or language of report.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed trials for eligibility and quality, and extracted data. Results are expressed as relative risk (RR) or weight mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty three trials (142 reports) were included (sirolimus (27), everolimus (5), head-to-head (1)). When TOR-I replaced CNI there was no difference in acute rejection, but serum creatinine was lower (MD -18.31 micromol/L, -30.96 to -5.67), and bone marrow more suppressed (leucopenia: RR 2.02 1.12 to 3.66; thrombocytopenia: RR 6.97 2.97 to 16.36; anaemia: RR 1.67, 1.27 to 2.20). When TOR-I replaced antimetabolites, acute rejection (RR 0.84, 0.71 to 0.99) and cytomegalovirus infection (CMV) (RR 0.49; 0.37 to 0.65) were reduced, but hypercholesterolaemia was increased (RR 1.65, 1.32 to 2.06). For low versus high-dose TOR-I, with equal CNI dose, rejection was increased (RR 1.23, 1.06 to 1.43) but calculated GFR higher (MD 4.27 mL/min, 1.12 to 7.41), and for low-dose TOR-I/standard-dose CNI versus higher-dose TOR-I/reduced CNI, acute rejection (RR 0.67, 0.52 to 0.88) and calculated GFR (MD -9.46 mL/min, -12.16 to -6.76) were reduced. There was no significant difference in mortality, graft loss or malignancy risk for TOR-I in any comparison.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

TOR-I have been evaluated in four different primary immunosuppressive algorithms; as replacement for CNI and for antimetabolites, in combination with CNI at low and high dose and with variable dose of CNI. Generally, surrogate endpoints for graft survival favour TOR-I (lower risk of acute rejection and higher GFR) and surrogate endpoints for patient outcomes are worsened by TOR-I (bone marrow suppression, lipid disturbance). Long-term hard-endpoint data from methodologically robust RCTs are still needed.

Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibody Therapy for Treating Acute Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trial Data

BACKGROUND

We performed a comprehensive systematic review to determine the relative benefits and harms of widely used interventions used to treat acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients: monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies (Ab).

METHODS

Databases and conference proceedings were searched for eligible trials in all languages, and two reviewers, working independently, assessed trials for eligibility and quality, and extracted data. Results are expressed as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Twenty-one trials (49 reports) were identified. Most trials were small, incompletely reported, especially for potential harms, and did not define outcome measures adequately. Fourteen trials (965 patients) compared therapies for first rejection episodes (eight Ab versus steroid, two Ab versus another Ab, and four other comparisons) In treating first rejection, Ab was better than steroid in reversing rejection (RR 0.57; CI 0.38-0.87) and preventing graft loss (death-censored RR 0.74; CI 0.58-0.95) but there was no difference in preventing subsequent rejection (RR 0.67; CI 0.43-1.04) or death (RR 1.16; CI 0.57-2.33) at 1 year. Seven trials (422 patients) investigated Ab treatment of steroid-resistant rejection (four Ab vs. another Ab, one different doses Ab, one different formulation Ab, two other comparisons). There was no benefit of muromonab-CD3 over ATG or ALG in reversing rejection (RR 1.32; CI 0.33-5.28), preventing subsequent rejection (RR 0.99; CI 0.61-1.59) or preventing graft loss (RR 1.80; CI 0.29-11.23) or death (RR 0.39; CI 0.09-1.65).

CONCLUSIONS

Given the clinical problem caused by acute rejection, comparable data are sparse, and clinically important differences in outcomes between widely used interventions have not been excluded. Standardized reproducible outcome criteria are needed.

Longitudinal analysis of chronic allograft nephropathy: clinicopathologic correlations

BACKGROUND

Loss of the allograft from chronic allograft nephropathy and death of the patient from vascular, malignant, or infective disease are the major problems in renal transplantation today. Protocol biopsy of the long-term kidney has provided new data with which to develop strategies for prevention and treatment of chronic allograft nephropathy.

METHODS

Two series of long-term protocol biopsies are reviewed. In the first, renal biopsies were obtained at time 0, and at 3 months and 12 months, and the recipients of the renal allografts were followed up for up to 15 years. In the second, the kidneys of recipients of simultaneous pancreas kidney transplants were biopsied annually for 10 years, and the results correlated with clinical events.

RESULTS

Chronic allograft nephropathy is caused by acute and chronic immune-mediated damage, as well as by chronic calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity. Both immune and nonimmune mechanisms exacerbate pre-existing donor disease and ischemia-reperfusion injury. Established interstitial fibrosis and arteriolar hyalinosis lead to progressive glomerular sclerosis and eventual loss of the graft.

CONCLUSION

Protocol biopsies have shown that clinical parameters of renal function underestimate the severity of chronic graft damage. Strategies for preventing or treating chronic renal allograft dysfunction and subsequent graft loss must better control rejection and simultaneously avoid nephrotoxicity.

Clinical islet transplantation in type 1 diabetes mellitus: results of Australia's first trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether pancreatic islet transplantation can control diabetes and prevent severe life-threatening hypoglycaemia.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

A single-arm observation study of six patients undergoing islet transplantation. All patients had had type 1 diabetes mellitus for over 5 years and documented episodes of repeated severe hypoglycaemia. Islets were isolated from donor pancreases digested by Liberase. Separated islets were infused into the recipient's liver via the portal vein. Patients were immunosuppressed with daclizumab, sirolimus and tacrolimus. The transplants were performed at Westmead Hospital, NSW, between October 2002 and February 2005.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Normal blood glucose control without administration of exogenous insulin; demonstration of islet function and abolition of hypoglycaemia.

RESULTS

Five of the patients received two islet infusions, and the sixth was withdrawn after one infusion following a portal vein thrombosis. Three patients became insulin-independent, with excellent glycaemic control. Two had islet function with circulating C-peptide, improved glycaemic control, reduced insulin requirement and abolition of severe hypoglycaemia. However, over a 2-year period, graft function deteriorated. Recipients who were initially insulin free remained C-peptide positive but required supplemental insulin. Complications included one postoperative bleed, two portal vein thromboses (which resolved completely), presumed recurrence of tuberculosis in one patient, and deterioration in renal function in one patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Islet transplantation is effective at improving glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia unawareness in the short to medium term. However, problems with long-term safety of immunosuppression, islet-induced thrombosis and early detection of loss of islet function remain to be addressed.

Sirolimus: Its role in nephrology (Review Article)

Sirolimus (Rapamycin, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Australia Pty Ltd, Baulkham Hills, NSW, Australia) (SRL) has received increasing attention as an immunosuppressant in renal and other solid organ transplantation. Sirolimus is the first marketed agent in a new class of drugs with a novel mechanism of action. Sirolimus binds, like tacrolimus, to a member of the FK binding protein (FKBP) family. The SRL/FKBP complex binds to the protein kinase mTOR. Binding to mTOR blocks activation of signal transduction pathways causing arrest of the cell cycle in the G1 phase. It is now known that mTOR is a central regulator of cell growth and proliferation. The immunosuppressive properties of SRL are due primarily to blockade of interleukin-2 (IL-2)-induced proliferation of T cells. There is still much to be learnt about how best to use the drug. The key advantage over the current choice of immunosuppressive agents is the ability to preserve renal function and pathology while producing excellent rejection-free, graft survival rates. Thus, SRL may find its pivotal role as a calcineurin inhibitors replacement in patients whose grafts are affected by chronic allograft nephropathy. A second major driver for use may prove to be the impact of SRL on cancer incidence and prognosis. Studies still need to be performed to evaluate the best timing for commencement of SRL and the optimal dosage to minimize side-effects.

Tacrolimus versus cyclosporin as primary immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for most patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Standard protocols in use typically involve three drug groups each directed to a site in the T-cell activation or proliferation cascade which are central to the rejection process: calcineurin inhibitors (e.g. cyclosporin, tacrolimus), anti-proliferative agents (e.g. azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil) and steroids (prednisolone). It remains unclear whether new regimens are more specific or simply more potent immunosuppressants.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of tacrolimus with cyclosporin as primary therapy for kidney transplant recipients.

SEARCH STRATEGY

MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cochrane Renal Group's specialist register and conference proceedings were searched to identify relevant reports of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Two reviewers assessed trials for eligibility, quality and extracted data independently.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All RCTs where tacrolimus was compared with cyclosporin for the initial treatment of kidney transplant recipients

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were synthesised (random effects model) and results expressed as relative risk (RR), values <1 favouring tacrolimus, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were used to examine potential effect modification by differences in trial design and immunosuppressive co-interventions.

MAIN RESULTS

123 reports from 30 trials (4102 patients) were included. At six months graft loss was significantly reduced in tacrolimus-treated recipients (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.86), and this effect was persistent up to three years. Meta-regression showed that this benefit diminished as higher trough levels of tacrolimus were targeted (P = 0.04), after allowing for differences in cyclosporin formulation (P = 0.97) and cyclosporin target trough level (P = 0.38). At one year, tacrolimus patients suffered less acute rejection (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.79), and less steroid-resistant rejection (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.64), but more insulin-requiring diabetes mellitus (RR 1.86, 1.11 to 3.09), tremor, headache, diarrhoea, dyspepsia and vomiting. Cyclosporin-treated recipients experienced significantly more constipation and cosmetic side-effects. We demonstrated no differences in infection or malignancy.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Tacrolimus is superior to cyclosporin in improving graft survival and preventing acute rejection after kidney transplantation, but increases post-transplant diabetes, neurological and gastrointestinal side effects. Treating 100 recipients with tacrolimus instead of cyclosporin would avoid 12 suffering acute rejection, two losing their graft but cause an extra five to become insulin-requiring diabetics.

Tacrolimus versus ciclosporin as primary immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients: meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomised trial data

OBJECTIVE

To compare the positive and negative effects of tacrolimus and ciclosporin as initial treatment for renal transplant recipients.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION

Reports of comparative randomised trials of tacrolimus and ciclosporin identified by searches of Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, the Cochrane Renal Group Specialist Register, and conference proceedings.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two reviewers assessed trials for eligibility and quality and extracted data independently. Data were synthesised (random effects model) and results expressed as relative risk (RR), with values < 1 favouring tacrolimus. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were used to examine potential effect modification by differences in trial design and immunosuppressive co-interventions.

RESULTS

123 reports from 30 trials (4102 patients) were included. At six months, graft loss was significantly reduced in tacrolimus treated recipients (RR = 0.56, 95% confidence interval 0.36 to 0.86), and this effect persisted up to three years. The relative reduction in graft loss with tacrolimus diminished with higher concentrations of tacrolimus (P = 0.04) but did not vary with ciclosporin formulation (P = 0.97) or ciclosporin concentration (P = 0.38). At one year, tacrolimus treated patients had less acute rejection (RR = 0.69, 0.60 to 0.79) and less steroid resistant rejection (RR = 0.49, 0.37 to 0.64) but more diabetes mellitus requiring insulin (RR = 1.86, 1.11 to 3.09), tremor, headache, diarrhoea, dyspepsia, and vomiting. The relative excess of diabetes increased with higher concentrations of tacrolimus (P = 0.003). Ciclosporin treated recipients had significantly more constipation and cosmetic side effects. No differences were seen in infection or malignancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Treating 100 recipients with tacrolimus instead of ciclosporin for the first year after transplantation avoids 12 patients having acute rejection and two losing their graft but causes an extra five patients to develop insulin dependent diabetes. Optimal drug choice may vary between patients.

Chronic renal allograft dysfunction

The major causes of renal transplant loss are death from vascular, malignant or infectious disease, and loss of the allograft from chronic renal dysfunction associated with the development of graft fibrosis and glomerulosclerosis. Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is the histologic description of the fibrosis, vascular and glomerular damage occurring in renal allografts. Clinical programs rely on monitoring change in serum creatinine for identification of patients at risk of CAN, but this change occurs late in the course of the disease, and underestimates the severity of pathologic change. CAN has several causes: ischemia-reperfusion injury, ineffectively or untreated clinical and subclinical rejection, and superimposed calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity, exacerbating pre-existing donor disease. Once established, interstitial fibrosis and arteriolar hyalinosis lead to progressive glomerulosclerosis over the subsequent years. There have been a number of approaches to treatment aimed at reducing the impact of CAN, mostly centered around avoidance of calcineurin inhibitors through their elimination in all, or just selected, patients. These immunosuppression strategies combine corticosteroids with azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil, and/or sirolimus and everolimus. Late identification of CAN in individual patients has meant that strategies for intervening to prevent chronic renal allograft dysfunction and subsequent graft loss tend to be "too little and far too late."

Genetic and functional evaluation of the level of inbreeding of the Westran pig: a herd with potential for use in xenotransplantation

BACKGROUND

The Westran pig has been purposely inbred for use in xenotransplantation. The herd originated in the wild from a limited gene pool and has been inbred by repeated full-sib matings for nine generations.

METHODS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of inbreeding by functional assays, such as bi-directional MLR and reciprocal skin grafts between herd members, and by genetic analysis using highly polymorphic genetic markers to calculate the level of inbreeding.

RESULTS

The MLR between herd members were non-reactive whereas there was a prompt response to third party pig lymphocytes, indicative of a normal immune responsiveness in Westran pigs but isogenicity of the major histocompatibility complex. Skin grafts between male siblings or female sibling skin grafts on male recipients showed prolonged survival but with few exceptions did not survive beyond 100 days suggesting that by the fifth generation the Westran herd was still mismatched at minor histocompatibility antigens. This level of functional inbreeding was confirmed by microsatellite analysis of highly polymorphic markers, which showed that 52 of 53 chromosomally dispersed markers were fixed by the ninth generation. This level of fixation was consistent with 19 to 20 generations of full-sibling inbreeding. The calculated inbreeding coefficient at generation 10 was 0.98159.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis confirms that the Westran pig is highly inbred and we propose that analysis of chromosomally dispersed highly polymorphic markers is an accurate and reproducible method for assessing the level of inbreeding of a pig herd.