Melanoma-associated leukoderma - immunology in black and white?

Melanoma is an 'immunogenic tumor', often highly infiltrated with lymphocytes, which are capable of inducing regression of the primary tumor. The commonly observed phenomenon of regression suggests substantial cross-talk between immune cells and transformed melanocytes. An immune response to melanocyte differentiation antigens common to transformed and normal melanocytes manifests clinically at distant sites as melanoma-associated vitiligo or halo nevi. Despite similar antigenic targets, the pathogenesis and prognosis differ between the different melanoma-associated leukodermas. Understanding immunologic cross-talk between melanocytes and the immune system will aid the development of approaches to combat melanoma.

Ependymomas: development of immunotherapeutic strategies

Ependymomas are among the most challenging childhood brain tumors. Although 50-70% of ependymomas are cured with surgery and irradiation, a significant percentage of tumors recur. Ependymomas that are not amenable to complete resection at diagnosis have a particularly poor prognosis, and the vast majority of affected children experience tumor recurrence. Although transient responses have been observed in recurrent tumors treated with re-irradiation and several chemotherapy regimens, long-term disease control is rarely achieved. Children with recurrent disease commonly experience cumulative neurological morbidity from repeated surgical and adjuvant therapy interventions and almost universally succumb to refractory tumor progression. Accordingly, conceptually new treatment approaches are needed, both to decrease the risk of tumor recurrence and to enhance disease control in those children who experience recurrent disease. This article reviews the current application of risk-based treatment stratification at diagnosis, the rationale for exploring the role of novel therapeutic strategies such as immunotherapy at recurrence and the concept behind a vaccine-based trial for these tumors.

Multicenter, randomized phase II trial of GM-CSF (GM) plus ipilimumab (Ipi) versus Ipi alone in metastatic melanoma: E1608

CRA9007

Background: CTLA-4 blockade and GM secreting tumor vaccine combinations demonstrate therapeutic synergy in multiple preclinical models. GM has activity in prostate and ovarian carcinoma and is being evaluated in phase III adjuvant trials for melanoma and lymphoma. GM enhances dendritic cell activation and potentiates antitumor T and B cell responses. GM may induce regulatory immune responses. A key issue is whether systemic GM might synergize with CTLA-4 blockade. Methods: Eligibility: measureable disease, ≤1 prior therapy, no CNS mets, ECOG PS 0-1, > 4 wks prior therapy, adequate end organ function, no autoimmune disease, no prior CTLA-4 blockade/CD137 agonist. OS was primary endpoint. Pts randomized to Arm A Ipi 10 mg/kg q3 wks IV x 4 then q12 wks plus GM 250 μg SC days 1-14 of 21 day cycles vs. Arm B Ipi 10 mg/kg as in Arm A alone. Due to known inflammatory effects of treatments, pts were permitted to continue up to 100% increase in SPD and four new lesions in absence of declining performance status and discretion of treating physician. Drug supply, funding from Sanofi/Bristol-Myers Squibb. Results: 245 pts were enrolled. Arms were balanced for demographics. Median follow up 13.3 mos. RR Arm A 11.3 % (6.1, 18.6), Arm B 14.7% (8.6,22.8) (not significant;NS). PFS Arm A 3 mos (2.9,4.3), Arm B 3.2 mos (3,4) (NS). Median OS Arm A not reached, Arm B 12.6 mos (9.2,-). One year OS for Arm A was 67.9% (59%,76%), Arm B 51.2% (42.6%, 61.3%) (stratified log rank p1=0.016, p2=0.033). HR for mortality on Ipi + GM/Ipi=0.65. Per study design (overall one-sided type I error 0.10), OS interim analysis was conducted at 69% info time. O’Brien-Fleming boundary was crossed for OS. Toxicity assessed for all cases regardless of eligibility. Gr 3-5 AEs 45% Arm A, 57% Arm B (p2=0.078). Gr 5 AEs: Arm A colonic perforation (1), cardiac arrest (1); Arm B multiorgan failure (2), colonic perforation (2), hepatic failure (1), respiratory failure (2). Conclusions: Ipi plus GM significantly improves OS over Ipi alone. No significant differences in toxicity were observed. A trend toward improved tolerability is noted in the GM arm. Clinical trial information: NCT01134614.

Multicenter, randomized phase II trial of GM-CSF (GM) plus ipilimumab (Ipi) versus ipi alone in metastatic melanoma: E1608

CRA9007

The full, final text of this abstract will be available at abstract.asco.org at 7:30 AM (EDT) on Saturday, June, 1, 2013, and in the Annual Meeting Proceedings online supplement to the June 20, 2013, issue of Journal of Clinical Oncology. Onsite at the Meeting, this abstract will be printed in the Saturday edition of ASCO Daily News.

T-regulatory cell function analysis in locally/regionally advanced melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab

3041

Background: We conducted an immunogenicity and biomarker analysis in stage IIIB-C melanoma patients treated with neoadjuvant ipilimumab (ipi) and reported a significant increase in the frequency of circulating T-regulatory cells (T-reg) (CD4+CD25hi+ Foxp3+; p=0.02 CD4+CD25hi+CD39+; p=0.001) from pre-ipi (baseline) to post-ipi (6 weeks) in treated patients (Tarhini et al., ASCO 2012). Also, increases in T-reg were associated with improved PFS (p=0.034; HR=0.57). We hypothesized that ipi induces its clinical activity in part through its effect on T-reg, and despite the observed increase in circulating T-reg frequency; their suppressor function is reduced. Methods: Patients were treated with ipi (10 mg/kg IV q3weeks x 2doses) bracketing definitive surgery. PBMC were collected at baseline and at 6 weeks. T-reg were isolated from pre-ipi (baseline) and post-ipi (6 weeks) PBMC samples utilizing Miltenyi Biotec T regulatory isolation kit (CD4+CD25+CD127dim/-). Isolated T-reg were incubated with OKT3/IL-2/CD28-stimulated and CFSE-labeled CD4+CD25- responder T-cells from the same patient time point at 1:1, 1:2 and 1:5 ratios. Flow cytometery was used to evaluate the number of cell divisions of CFSE labeled responder cells and, therefore, the degree of T-reg proliferation suppression. Results: Thirty-five patients were enrolled in the study; of those, 18 patients had adequate PBMC samples with sufficient T-reg isolated for T-reg functional analysis. Preliminary analysis of the first 13 patients shows a trend toward decreased suppressive function of T-reg after treatment with ipi. Expressed as “percent of maximum inhibition”, pre- vs. post-ipi T-reg showed 61% vs. 47% suppressive activity (p=0.15) at the 1:1 ratio. Conclusions: There was a trend toward decreased suppressive function of T-reg after treatment with ipi, supporting the function modulation hypothesis. T-reg functional analysis for the remaining 5 patients is ongoing and we will perform comparative studies of changes in T-reg function with changes in T-reg frequency and clinical outcomes in the entire cohort.

A randomized phase II trial of multiepitope vaccination with melanoma peptides for cytotoxic T cells and helper T cells for patients with metastatic melanoma (E1602)

PURPOSE

This multicenter randomized trial was designed to evaluate whether melanoma helper peptides augment cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses to a melanoma vaccine and improve clinical outcome in patients with advanced melanoma.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

One hundred seventy-five patients with measurable stage IV melanoma were enrolled into 4 treatment groups, vaccinated with 12 MHC class I-restricted melanoma peptides to stimulate CTL (12 MP, group A), plus a tetanus peptide (group B), or a mixture of 6 melanoma helper peptides (6 MHP, group C) to stimulate helper T lymphocytes (HTL), or with 6 melanoma helper peptide (6 MHP) alone (group D), in incomplete Freund's adjuvant plus granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor. CTL responses were assessed using an in vitro-stimulated IFN-γ ELIspot assay, and HTL responses were assessed using a proliferation assay.

RESULTS

In groups A to D, respectively, CTL response rates to 12 melanoma peptides were 43%, 47%, 28%, and 5%, and HTL response rates to 6 MHP were in 3%, 0%, 40%, and 41%. Best clinical response was partial response in 7 of 148 evaluable patients (4.7%) without significant difference among study arms. Median overall survival (OS) was 11.8 months. Immune response to 6 MHP was significantly associated with both clinical response (P = 0.036) and OS (P = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Each vaccine regimen was immunogenic, but MHPs did not augment CTL responses to 12 melanoma peptides. The association of survival and immune response to 6 MHP supports further investigation of helper peptide vaccines. For patients with advanced melanoma, multipeptide vaccines should be studied in combination with other potentially synergistic active therapies.

Neoadjuvant ipilimumab in locally/regionally advanced melanoma: Clinical outcome and biomarker analysis

76

Background: Neoadjuvant ipilimumab (Ipi) for stage IIIB-C melanoma may improve the clinical outcome and provide access to pre/post Ipi blood. Methods: Pts were treated with Ipi (10mg/kg IV q3wks x 2 doses) bracketing definitive surgery. Tissue samples were obtained at baseline and at surgery (wk ≥ 6) and serum/PBMC collected at baseline, 6 wks, 3, 6, 9, 12 mos and/or progression. Flow cytometry was used to monitor the host immune response in blood and evaluable tumor. IHC for select markers was also performed. Baseline and wk-6 serum cytokines were tested by xMAP multiplex technology (Luminex Corp). Results: 31 pts were enrolled, 6 had stage IIIB (N2b, N2c), and 25 IIIC (N3) melanoma. Worst toxicities (N=31 pts) included grade 3 diarrhea/colitis (5 pts; 16%), hepatitis (2; 6%), rash (1; 3%), lipase (2; 6%), all manageable. Median f/u was 19 mos: among 29 evaluable pts, median PFS was 12.9 mos, 95% CI = (7.4,-). Only 2 pts died. Peripherally, a significant increase in circulating T-regs (CD4+CD25hi+ Foxp3+; p=0.02 CD4+CD25hi+CD39+; p=0.001) from baseline to 6 wks was observed. Significant decreases in circulating MDSCs, were observed in monocytic HLA-DR+/low/CD14+ MDSC (p<0.0001). Greater increases in T-regs were associated with improved PFS (p=0.034; HR=0.57). Spontaneous in vivo cross-presentation was observed resulting in Th1CD4+ and CD8+ antigen specific T-cell immunity (gp-100, MART-1, NY-ESO-1 peptides). Significant fold increase (3-10-fold) in CD3+/CD4+/INF-γ+ antigen specific T cells was seen only in pts who were progression free at 6 mos. Baseline serum IL-17 correlates with grade 3 diarrhea (p=0.02). In tumor, Tregs appeared higher at wk 6 in PD group while the opposite in clinical benefit group (p=0.09). In tumor, Ipi induced TIL T-cell activation as evidenced by CD69 in the absence of other in vitro stimulation and induced T cell memory (CD45RO+) and not naïve (CD45RO-). By IHC, there was significant increase in CD8+ TIL after ipilimumab (p=0.02). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant ipi exhibited promising clinical activity and significantly modulated the host effector and suppressor immune response. Functional studies and prediction modeling analyses of biomarker findings are ongoing.

Immunotherapy of cancer in 2012

The immunotherapy of cancer has made significant strides in the past few years due to improved understanding of the underlying principles of tumor biology and immunology. These principles have been critical in the development of immunotherapy in the laboratory and in the implementation of immunotherapy in the clinic. This improved understanding of immunotherapy, enhanced by increased insights into the mechanism of tumor immune response and its evasion by tumors, now permits manipulation of this interaction and elucidates the therapeutic role of immunity in cancer. Also important, this improved understanding of immunotherapy and the mechanisms underlying immunity in cancer has fueled an expanding array of new therapeutic agents for a variety of cancers. Pegylated interferon-α2b as an adjuvant therapy and ipilimumab as therapy for advanced disease, both of which were approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for melanoma in March 2011, are 2 prime examples of how an increased understanding of the principles of tumor biology and immunology have been translated successfully from the laboratory to the clinical setting. Principles that guide the development and application of immunotherapy include antibodies, cytokines, vaccines, and cellular therapies. The identification and further elucidation of the role of immunotherapy in different tumor types, and the development of strategies for combining immunotherapy with cytotoxic and molecularly targeted agents for future multimodal therapy for cancer will enable even greater progress and ultimately lead to improved outcomes for patients receiving cancer immunotherapy.

Neoadjuvant ipilimumab in locally/regionally advanced melanoma: Clinical outcome and immune monitoring

8533

Background: Neoadjuvant ipilimumab (ipi) for stage IIIB-C melanoma may improve the clinical outcomes and provide access to pre/post ipi blood and tumor to gain insight into host effector and suppressor immune response mechanisms. Methods: Patients were treated with ipi (10 mg/kg IV q3weeks x 4doses total) bracketing definitive surgery. Tissue samples were obtained at baseline and at definitive surgery (week ≥ 6) and serum/PBMC collected at baseline, 6 weeks, then at 3, 6, 9, 12 months and/or progression. Flow cytometry was used to monitor the host effector and suppressor immune response in blood and evaluable tumor. Results: Thirty pts (21 male, 9 female), age 40-87 were enrolled (25 cutaneous primary, 1 unknown, 4 mucosal). Six had AJCC stage IIIB (N2b, N2c) and 24 IIIC (N3) melanoma. Ninety-three cycles have been delivered (median 4). Worst toxicities included grade 3 diarrhea/colitis (5 patients; 17%), hepatic enzyme elevations (2; 7%), rash (2; 7%), lipase (1; 3%), all manageable. Median follow up is 14 months: among 29 evaluable pts 15 (52%) continue disease free. Median PFS is 15.5 months, 95% CI = (8.1,-). The probability of 6 and 12 month PFS is 82.4% (95% CI=0.63, 0.92) and 53% (95% CI=0.31, 0.70) respectively. Peripherally, a significant increase in frequency of circulating T-regs (CD4+CD25hi+ Foxp3+; p=0.02 CD4+CD25hi+CD39+; p=0.001) from baseline to 6 weeks was observed. Greater increases in T-regs were associated with improved PFS (p=0.045; HR=0.54). Significant decreases in circulating MDSCs, were observed in monocytic HLA-DR+/low/CD14+ MDSC subtype (p<0.0001). Spontaneous in vivo cross presentation was observed resulting in Th1 CD4 and CD8 antigen specific T-cell immunity (gp-100, MART-1, NY-ESO-1 peptides) with increase in frequency after ipi. Activated TIL in tumor increased after ipi (CD3+/CD4+/CD69+;p=0.06 and CD3+/CD8+/CD69+) with significant induction/potentiation of T-cell memory (CD8+/CD45RO+/TNF-α+;p=0.03). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant ipi exhibits promising clinical activity and significantly modulates the host effector and suppressor immune response. Full analysis of this completed trial and its correlates will be presented. Support: BMS, P30CA047904 and P50CA121973.

Abstract 5375: Modulation of circulating regulatory T-cells and MDSCs in high risk melanoma patients treated with neoadjuvant ipilimumab

Background: Melanoma regional lymph node and in-transit metastases (stage IIIB-C) carry a high relapse and mortality risk. Neoadjuvant ipilimumab may modulate the host suppressor immune response, enhance antitumor immunity and improve the clinical outcome. Methods: Patients with clinically palpable stage IIIB-C melanoma were treated with induction ipilimumab (10 mg/kg IV q3weeks x2doses) preoperatively and had definitive lymphadenectomy (week ≥ 6), followed by 2 maintenance doses of ipilimumab (q3 weeks). Tissue samples were obtained at baseline and at definitive surgery (after 2 doses of ipilimumab) and blood (serum/PBMC) collected at baseline, 6 weeks, then at 3, 6, 9, 12 months and/or progression. Circulating T-regulatory cells (T-regs) and myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC) were monitored utilizing multicolor flow cytometry comparing preoperative (6 weeks) and baseline samples. Results: Twenty nine patients (20 male, 9 female), age 40-87 (median 54) have been enrolled since February/2010 (24 cutaneous primary, 1 unknown and 4 mucosal). Five had AJCC stage IIIB (N2b, N2c) and 24 had IIIC (N3) melanoma. Ninety one cycles have been delivered (median 4). Grade 3 (worst) toxicities include diarrhea/colitis (5 patients; 17%), hepatic enzyme elevations (2; 7%), rash (2; 7%), lipase (1; 3%), all manageable. Median follow-up is 9.7 months and 18 patients (62%) continue disease free. Median PFS is 15.5 months, 95% CI = (8.1, -). The probability of 6 and 12 months PFS is 84.2% (95% CI=0.63, 0.94) and 54.1% (95% CI=0.31, 0.73) respectively. There is a significant increase in the frequency of circulating T-regs (CD4+CD25hi+ Foxp3+; p=0.023 CD4+CD25hi+CD39+; p=0.001) from baseline to 6 weeks. In parallel there is a significant decrease in circulating MDSCs: (1) monocytic: HLA-DR+/low/CD14+; p=&lt;.0001 and less significantly for (2) other monocytic: lin1neg/HLA-DRneg/CD33+/CD11b+; p=0.198 and (3) lymphoid: Lin1neg/HLA-DR-/CD33+/CD11b+; p=0.338. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant ipilimumab is clinically promising and significantly downregulates MDSCs which appear to play a significant role in the clinical activity of ipilimumab. T-regs are upregulated as part of the overall CD4+ T-cell population, and functional studies of this population are ongoing.

Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 5375. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-5375

Abstract LB-131: Peptide vaccine therapy for childhood gliomas: interim results of a pilot study

Introduction: Malignant astrocytomas of the brainstem and cerebral hemispheres and multiply recurrent low-grade gliomas carry a poor prognosis despite current treatments, and new therapeutic approaches are needed. Having gained significant experience with immunotherapy for adult gliomas, we extended these insights to childhood gliomas, based on our observations regarding their profiles of glioma-associated antigen (GAA) expression. Methodology: We initiated a pilot trial of subcutaneous vaccinations with peptides for GAA epitopes emulsified in Montanide-ISA-51 given every 3 weeks for 8 courses along with intramuscular injections of poly-ICLC in HLA-A2+ children with newly diagnosed brainstem gliomas (BSG), cerebral high-grade gliomas (HGG), or recurrent gliomas. GAAs were EphA2, IL13Rα2, and survivin. Primary endpoints were safety and T cell responses against vaccine-targeted GAAs, assessed by ELISPOT and tetramer analysis. Treatment response was evaluated clinically and by MR imaging. Results: To date, 24 children have been enrolled, 13 with newly diagnosed BSG, 5 with newly diagnosed HGG, and 6 with recurrent gliomas. No dose-limiting non-CNS toxicity has been encountered. One child with a BSG had transient tumor enlargement in association with acute neurological deterioration 4 months after beginning vaccination that later regressed and culminated in a sustained partial response (PR), consistent with pseudoprogression. Two other children with BSG had symptomatic pseudoprogression, with transient neurological deterioration and tumor enlargement followed by stabilization on decreasing steroid doses. Among 22 patients evaluable for response, 4 had rapidly progressive disease, 14 had stable disease for &gt; 3 months, 2 had PRs, 1 had an MR, and 1 had prolonged disease-free status after surgery. ELISPOT analysis, completed in seven children, showed response to IL13Rα2 in 5, EphA2 in 3, and survivin in 3. Conclusion: Peptide vaccination in children with gliomas is generally well tolerated, and has preliminary evidence of both immunological and clinical activity. Pseudoprogression can initially be difficult to distinguish from true tumor progression and aggressive management may be warranted.

Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-131. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-LB-131

Function but not phenotype of melanoma peptide-specific CD8(+) T cells correlate with survival in a multiepitope peptide vaccine trial (ECOG 1696)

ECOG 1696 was a Phase II multi-center trial testing vaccination with melanoma peptides, gp100, MART-1 and tyrosinase delivered alone, with GM-CSF, IFN-α2b or both cytokines to HLA-A2(+) patients with metastatic melanoma. Here, the frequency of circulating CD8(+) tetramer(+) (tet(+) ) T cells and maturation stages of responding T cells were serially monitored and compared with baseline values in a subset of patients (n = 37) from this trial. Multiparameter flow cytometry was used to measure the frequency of CD8(+) T cells specific for gp100, MART-1, tyrosinase and influenza (FLU) peptides. Expression of CD45RA/CCR7 on CD8(+) tet(+) T cells and CD25, CD27, CD28 on all circulating T cells was determined. Vaccine-induced changes in the CD8(+) tet(+) T cell frequency and phenotype were compared with results of IFN-γ ELISPOT assays and with clinical responses. The frequency of CD8(+) tet(+) T cells in the circulation was increased for the melanoma peptides (p < 0.03-0.0001) but not for FLU (p < 0.9). Only gp100- and MART-1-specific T cells differentiated to CD45RA(+) CCR7(-) effector/memory T cells. In contrast to the IFN-γ ELISPOT frequency, previously correlated with overall survival (Kirkwood et al., Clin Cancer Res 2009;15:1443-51), neither the frequency nor differentiation stage of CD8(+) tet(+) T cells correlated with clinical responses. Delivery of GM-CSF and/or IFN-α2b had no effects on the frequency or differentiation of CD8(+) tet(+) , CD8+ or CD4+ T cells. Phenotypic analyses of CD8(+) tet(+) T cells did not correlate with clinical responses to the vaccine, indicating that functional assessments of peptide-specific T cells are preferable for monitoring of anti-tumor vaccines.

Defining the critical hurdles in cancer immunotherapy

Scientific discoveries that provide strong evidence of antitumor effects in preclinical models often encounter significant delays before being tested in patients with cancer. While some of these delays have a scientific basis, others do not. We need to do better. Innovative strategies need to move into early stage clinical trials as quickly as it is safe, and if successful, these therapies should efficiently obtain regulatory approval and widespread clinical application. In late 2009 and 2010 the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC), convened an "Immunotherapy Summit" with representatives from immunotherapy organizations representing Europe, Japan, China and North America to discuss collaborations to improve development and delivery of cancer immunotherapy. One of the concepts raised by SITC and defined as critical by all parties was the need to identify hurdles that impede effective translation of cancer immunotherapy. With consensus on these hurdles, international working groups could be developed to make recommendations vetted by the participating organizations. These recommendations could then be considered by regulatory bodies, governmental and private funding agencies, pharmaceutical companies and academic institutions to facilitate changes necessary to accelerate clinical translation of novel immune-based cancer therapies. The critical hurdles identified by representatives of the collaborating organizations, now organized as the World Immunotherapy Council, are presented and discussed in this report. Some of the identified hurdles impede all investigators; others hinder investigators only in certain regions or institutions or are more relevant to specific types of immunotherapy or first-in-humans studies. Each of these hurdles can significantly delay clinical translation of promising advances in immunotherapy yet if overcome, have the potential to improve outcomes of patients with cancer.

Randomized controlled trial of a collaborative care intervention to manage cancer-related symptoms: lessons learned

BACKGROUND

Collaborative care interventions to treat depression have begun to be tested in settings outside of primary care. However, few studies have expanded the collaborative care model to other settings and targeted comorbid physical symptoms of depression.

PURPOSE

The aims of this report were to: (1) describe the design and methods of a trial testing the efficacy of a stepped collaborative care intervention designed to manage cancer-related symptoms and improve overall quality of life in patients diagnosed with hepatobiliary carcinoma; and (2) share the lessons learned during the design, implementation, and evaluation of the trial.

METHODS

The trial was a phase III randomized controlled trial testing the efficacy of a stepped collaborative care intervention to reduce depression, pain, and fatigue in patients diagnosed with advanced cancer. The intervention was compared to an enhanced usual care arm. The primary outcomes included the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression scale, Brief Pain Inventory, and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-Fatigue, and the FACT-Hepatobiliary. Sociodemographic and disease-specific characteristics were recorded from the medical record; Natural Killer cells and cytokines that are associated with these symptoms and with disease progression were assayed from serum.

RESULTS

  and  Discussion The issues addressed include: (1) development of collaborative care in the context of oncology (e.g., timing of the intervention, tailoring of the intervention, ethical issues regarding randomization of patients, and changes in medical treatment over the course of the study); (2) use of a website by chronically ill populations (e.g., design and access to the website, development of the website and intervention, ethical issues associated with website development, website usage, and unanticipated costs associated with website development); (3) evaluation of the efficacy of intervention (e.g., patient preferences, proxy raters, changes in medical treatment, and inclusion of biomarkers as endpoints); and (4) analyses and interpretation of the intervention (e.g., confounding factors, dose and active ingredients, and risks and benefits of collaborative care interventions in chronically ill patients).

LIMITATIONS

The limitations to the study, although not fully realized at this time as the trial is ongoing, include: (1) heterogeneity of the diagnoses and treatments of participants; and (2) inclusion of caregivers as proxy raters but not as participants in the intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Collaborative care interventions to manage multiple symptoms in a tertiary cancer center are feasible. However, researchers designing and implementing interventions that are web-based, target multiple symptoms, and for oncology patients may benefit from previous experiences.

A short course of neoadjuvant IRX-2 induces changes in peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

IRX-2, a primary cell-derived biologic with pleotropic immune activity, was shown to induce increased lymphocyte infiltrations into the tumor of patients with head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) after 10 days of neoadjuvant therapy (Berinstein et al. 2011). In the same patients enrolled in the Phase II study, peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets were monitored pre- and post-IRX-2 therapy to evaluate changes induced by IRX-2.

METHODS

Absolute lymphocyte numbers were determined in whole blood using the TetraONE System. Lymphocytes were further separated on Ficoll-Hypaque gradients and evaluated by multiparameter flow cytometry. Lymphocyte numbers, including regulatory T cells (Treg) and naïve, memory and effector T cells, were compared in pre- and post-therapy specimens.

RESULTS

Total lymphocyte numbers remained unchanged after IRX-2 therapy. Significant changes occurred in numbers of circulating B cells and NKT cells, which decreased following IRX-2 therapy. The frequency of circulating Treg (CD4(+)CD25(high)) remained unaltered (e.g., 6.7 ± 0.6% vs. 7.5 ± 0.8%; means ± SEM) as was the CD8(+)/Treg ratio (6.6 before and 6.7 after IRX-2 therapy). The mean absolute number of CD3(+)CD45RA(+)CCR7(+) (naïve) T cells was decreased after IRX-2 therapy but numbers of total memory (i.e., central and peripheral) and terminally differentiated T cells were unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

IRX-2-mediated reductions in B and NKT cell numbers in the blood suggest a redistribution of these cells to tissues. A decrease in naïve T cells implies their up-regulated differentiation to memory T cells. Unchanged Treg numbers after IRX-2 therapy indicate that IRX-2 does not expand this compartment, potentially benefiting anti-tumor immune responses.

Multiplex serum biomarker assessments: technical and biostatistical issues

BACKGROUND

Identification of predictive and prognostic biomarkers for patients with disease and undergoing different therapeutic options is a very active area of investigation. Many of these studies seek biomarkers among circulating proteins accessed in blood. Many levels of standardization in materials and procedures have been identified which can impact the resulting data.

METHODS

Here, we have observed unexpected variability in levels of commonly tested analytes in serum which were processed and stored under standardized conditions. We have identified apparent changes in cytokine, chemokine and growth factor levels detected by multiplex Luminex assay in melanoma patient and healthy donor serum samples, over storage time at -80°C. Controls included Luminex kit standards, multiplexed cytokine standards and WHO cytokine controls. Data were analyzed by Wilcoxon rank-sum testing and Spearman's test for correlations.

RESULTS

The interpretation of these changes is confounded by lot-to-lot kit standard curve reagent changes made by a single manufacturer of Luminex kits.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identifies previously unknown sources of variation in a commonly used biomarker assay, and suggests additional levels of controls needed for identification of true changes in circulating protein levels.

SITC/iSBTc Cancer Immunotherapy Biomarkers Resource Document: online resources and useful tools - a compass in the land of biomarker discovery

Recent positive clinical results in cancer immunotherapy point to the potential of immune-based strategies to provide effective treatment of a variety of cancers. In some patients, the responses to cancer immunotherapy are durable, dramatically extending survival. Extensive research efforts are being made to identify and validate biomarkers that can help identify subsets of cancer patients that will benefit most from these novel immunotherapies. In addition to the clear advantage of such predictive biomarkers, immune biomarkers are playing an important role in the development, clinical evaluation and monitoring of cancer immunotherapies. This Cancer Immunotherapy Resource Document, prepared by the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC, formerly the International Society for Biological Therapy of Cancer, iSBTc), provides key references and online resources relevant to the discovery, evaluation and clinical application of immune biomarkers. These key resources were identified by experts in the field who are actively pursuing research in biomarker identification and validation. This organized collection of the most useful references, online resources and tools serves as a compass to guide discovery of biomarkers essential to advancing novel cancer immunotherapies.

Recommendations from the iSBTc-SITC/FDA/NCI Workshop on Immunotherapy Biomarkers

PURPOSE

To facilitate development of innovative immunotherapy approaches, especially for treatment concepts exploiting the potential benefits of personalized therapy, there is a need to develop and validate tools to identify patients who can benefit from immunotherapy. Despite substantial effort, we do not yet know which parameters of antitumor immunity to measure and which assays are optimal for those measurements.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The iSBTc-SITC (International Society for Biological Therapy of Cancer-Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer), FDA (Food and Drug Administration), and NCI (National Cancer Institute) partnered to address these issues for immunotherapy of cancer. Here, we review the major challenges, give examples of approaches and solutions, and present our recommendations.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Although specific immune parameters and assays are not yet validated, we recommend following standardized (accurate, precise, and reproducible) protocols and use of functional assays for the primary immunologic readouts of a trial; consideration of central laboratories for immune monitoring of large, multi-institutional trials; and standardized testing of several phenotypic and functional potential potency assays specific to any cellular product. When reporting results, the full QA (quality assessment)/QC (quality control) should be conducted and selected examples of truly representative raw data and assay performance characteristics should be included. Finally, to promote broader analysis of multiple aspects of immunity, and gather data on variability, we recommend that in addition to cells and serum, RNA and DNA samples be banked (under standardized conditions) for later testing. We also recommend that sufficient blood be drawn to allow for planned testing of the primary hypothesis being addressed in the trial, and that additional baseline and posttreatment blood is banked for testing novel hypotheses (or generating new hypotheses) that arise in the field.

Lentivirally engineered dendritic cells activate AFP-specific T cells which inhibit hepatocellular carcinoma growth in vitro and in vivo

α-fetoprotein (AFP), a tumor-associated antigen for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), is an established biomarker for HCC. In this study, we created a lentivirus expressing the AFP antigen and investigated the anti-tumor activity of AFP-specific CD8+ T cells, with and without CD4+ T cells, which were activated by either AFP peptide-pulsed or Lenti-AFP-engineered Dendritic cells (DCs) in vitro and in vivo. AFP-specific T cells could efficiently kill HepG2 HCC cells, and produced IL-2, IFN-γ, TNF-α, perforin and granzyme B, with minimal production of IL-10 (a negative regulator of T cell activation). Both strategies activated AFP-specific T cells, but the lentiviral strategy was superior by several measures. Data also support an impact of CD4+ T cells in supporting anti-tumor activity. In vivo studies in a xenograft HCC tumor model also showed that AFP-specific T cells could markedly suppress HCC tumor formation and morbidity in tumor-bearing nude mice, as well as regulate serum levels of related cytokines and anti-tumor molecules. In parallel with human in vitro T cell cultures, the in vivo model demonstrated superior anti-tumor effects and Th1-skewing with Lenti-AFP-DCs. This study supports the superiority of a full-length antigen lentivirus-based DCs vaccine strategy over peptides, and provides new insight into the design of DCs-based vaccines.

Induction of CD8+ T-cell responses against novel glioma-associated antigen peptides and clinical activity by vaccinations with {alpha}-type 1 polarized dendritic cells and polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid stabilized by lysine and carboxymethylcellulose in patients with recurrent malignant glioma

PURPOSE

A phase I/II trial was performed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a novel vaccination with α-type 1 polarized dendritic cells (αDC1) loaded with synthetic peptides for glioma-associated antigen (GAA) epitopes and administration of polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid [poly(I:C)] stabilized by lysine and carboxymethylcellulose (poly-ICLC) in HLA-A2(+) patients with recurrent malignant gliomas. GAAs for these peptides are EphA2, interleukin (IL)-13 receptor-α2, YKL-40, and gp100.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-two patients (13 with glioblastoma multiforme [GBM], five with anaplastic astrocytoma [AA], three with anaplastic oligodendroglioma [AO], and one with anaplastic oligoastrocytoma [AOA]) received at least one vaccination, and 19 patients received at least four vaccinations at two αDC1 dose levels (1 × or 3 × 10(7)/dose) at 2-week intervals intranodally. Patients also received twice weekly intramuscular injections of 20 μg/kg poly-ICLC. Patients who demonstrated positive radiologic response or stable disease without major adverse events were allowed to receive booster vaccines. T-lymphocyte responses against GAA epitopes were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot and HLA-tetramer assays.

RESULTS

The regimen was well-tolerated. The first four vaccines induced positive immune responses against at least one of the vaccination-targeted GAAs in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in 58% of patients. Peripheral blood samples demonstrated significant upregulation of type 1 cytokines and chemokines, including interferon-α and CXCL10. Nine (four GBM, two AA, two AO, and one AOA) achieved progression-free status lasting at least 12 months. One patient with recurrent GBM demonstrated sustained complete response. IL-12 production levels by αDC1 positively correlated with time to progression.

CONCLUSION

These data support safety, immunogenicity, and preliminary clinical activity of poly-ICLC-boosted αDC1-based vaccines.

Immuno-oncology biomarkers 2010 and beyond: perspectives from the iSBTc/SITC biomarker task force

The International Society for Biological Therapy of Cancer (iSBTc, recently renamed the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer, SITC) hosted a one-day symposium at the National Institutes of Health on September 30, 2010 to address development and application of biomarkers in cancer immunotherapy. The symposium, titled Immuno-Oncology Biomarkers 2010 and Beyond: Perspectives from the iSBTc/SITC Biomarker Task Force, gathered approximately 230 investigators equally from academia, industry and governmental/regulatory agencies from around the globe for panel discussions and presentations on the following topics: 1) immunologic monitoring: standardization and validation of assays; 2) correlation of immunity to biologic activity, clinical response and potency assays; 3) novel methodologies for assessing the immune landscape: clinical utility of novel technologies; and 4) recommendations on incorporation of biomarkers into the clinical arena. The presentations are summarized in this report; additional program information and slides are available online at the iSBTc/SITC website.

New approaches to the development of adenoviral dendritic cell vaccines in melanoma

Considerable research in the field of immunotherapy for melanoma has demonstrated that this tumor type can be responsive to therapeutic immune activation strategies. In early clinical trials, vaccine strategies using dendritic cells (DCs) and adenovirus (Ad) vectors (AdVs) were safe and immunogenic, and induced clinical responses in a minority of patients. Research from the past several years has yielded an improved mechanistic understanding of DC biology, AdV effects on DCs and the crosstalk that occurs between antigen-loaded DCs and specific lymphocyte subsets. This knowledge base is being combined with technological advances in cytokine delivery, AdV design and in vivo DC targeting. These developments are leading to novel AdV-transduced DC-based therapeutic modalities that may further advance melanoma immunotherapy. Interactions between AdVs and DCs, initial clinical trial results, and new developments in DC engineering and in AdV biology are reviewed.