Characteristics of hepatitis C in renal transplant candidates

GOALS

To characterize hepatitis C in renal transplant candidates and to compare hepatitis C-related liver disease between patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and well-matched control subjects without renal disease.

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C is common in dialysis patients and can cause morbidity and mortality in renal transplant recipients. Patients with advanced hepatitis C often are excluded from renal transplantation.

STUDY

Forty-six renal transplant candidates and 46 control subjects matched for age, sex, and race without renal disease were included. Demographic, laboratory, and histologic data were compared between patients with ESRD and control subjects.

RESULTS

Alanine aminotransferase levels were significantly lower in patients with ESRD (p < 0.001). Hepatitis C virus RNA levels were similar between groups. Patients with ESRD had less inflammatory activity (p < 0.001) and a lower proportion of bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis (13%) than control subjects (30%, p = 0.043). Clinical and laboratory features did not predict histologic grade or stage of hepatitis C in patients with ESRD. Two complications of percutaneous liver biopsy occurred per three diagnoses of cirrhosis in patients with ESRD. No complications occurred with transjugular liver biopsy in this group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with ESRD had less severe hepatitis C than did control subjects. Clinical measurements did not predict histologic findings in renal transplant candidates. Transjugular liver biopsy should be considered to stage hepatitis C in renal transplant candidates due to the risk of percutaneous biopsy in uremic patients.

Induction of IL-1Ra in resistant and responsive hepatitis C patients following treatment with IFN-con1

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is resistant to interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) in some patients. The mechanism of this resistance is unknown. Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) is induced by IFN-alpha and is a good indicator of IFN activity. In the current study, we compared IL-1Ra levels in rapid virologic responders and flat responders who showed resistance to IFN. Three groups of patients were examined, including those who received a single dose of consensus IFN (IFN-con1), patients who received daily IFN-con1 for 1 week, and patients who received IFN-con1 daily for 24 weeks. Serum IL-1Ra, IL-6, and HCV RNA were measured serially in all groups. Serum IL-1Ra levels increased rapidly in all patients with hepatitis C after IFN-alpha administration, irrespective of their virologic response. IL-1Ra levels remained elevated at 1 week but were similar to baseline by week 2 of treatment in patients receiving continuous therapy. IL-6 levels also increased acutely but rose more slowly than IL-1Ra levels. The increase in IL-1Ra and IL-6 observed in both flat and rapid virologic responders indicates that IFN receptors are functioning in patients with IFN-resistant hepatitis C and that the lack of response is related to other virologic or immunologic factors.

An analysis of acute changes in interleukin-6 levels after treatment of hepatitis C with consensus interferon

Cytokine production has been implicated in the antiviral response to interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) in hepatitis C and in the development of IFN-alpha-related side effects. We characterized acute changes in serum cytokine levels following administration of a single dose of consensus IFN (IFN-con1) and during continuous treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients. Serum samples were collected at baseline, at multiple times early after IFN administration, and weekly thereafter. Viral RNA titers were assessed by RT-PCR, and viral kinetics were followed. ELISA assays were used to measure IFN-gamma, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin-2 (IL-2), IL-4, IL-6, and IL-16. Serum cytokine levels were low at baseline. IL-6 was detected in patients with hepatitis C but not in healthy control subjects by either ELISA or RT-PCR, indicating that low levels of circulating IL-6 were associated with hepatitis C infection. None of the cytokines measured increased significantly after IFN administration except for IL-6. IL-6 levels rose rapidly, peaked at 6-15 h in a dose-dependent manner, and returned to baseline by 48 h in both patients receiving a single dose of IFN and those receiving continuous treatment. This was confirmed by RT-PCR. Pretreatment IL-6 levels were directly correlated with area under the curve (AUC) for IL-6 during the 24 h after IFN dosing (r = 0.611, p = 0.007). Viral titers decreased within 24-48 h after a single dose of IFN-con1. Changes in hepatitis C RNA titers were not significantly associated with pretreatment IL-6 levels or with changes in IL-6 levels. In conclusion, (1) baseline serum cytokine levels, except for IL-6, were low or within the normal range in patients with hepatitis C, (2) IL-6 levels were detected in some patients with hepatitis C before treatment but not in healthy controls, (3) IL-6 levels increased acutely after a single dose of IFN-alpha, and IL-6 induction was related to baseline IL-6 level, and (4) changes in IL-6 levels did not correlate with the early virologic response to IFN.

Treatment of hepatitis C virus and HIV co-infections

Hepatitis C coinfection is common in patients with HIV, particularly in injection-drug users. Hepatitis C virus levels tend to be higher in coinfected patients, and histologic progression is more rapid than in patients with HCV alone. The efficacy of interferon monotherapy in HIV patients with an adequate CD4 cell count is comparable to that observed in patients without HIV. The combination of interferon plus ribavirin and pegylated interferon will further improve response rates. Interferon therapy is associated with leukopenia and a decrease in absolute CD4 cell count. Some concern remains that ribavirin might reduce the activity of pyrimidine analogues such as zidovudine and stavudine, and HIV-RNA levels should be followed when these medications are given concurrently. It is hoped that in time, new drug development will make the multiple-drug therapeutic strategy that has been highly successful in the management of HIV feasible for the treatment of HCV.

Patients' values for health states associated with hepatitis C and physicians' estimates of those values

OBJECTIVES

Hepatitis C is the leading cause of chronic hepatitis in the United States. Little information is available regarding how persons with hepatitis C view health with their disease. We studied patients' perceptions about the value of hepatitis C health states and evaluated whether physicians understand their patients' perspectives about this disease.

METHODS

A total of 50 consecutive persons with hepatitis C were surveyed when they presented as new patients to a hepatology practice. Subjects provided utility assessments (preference values) for five hepatitis C health states and for treatment side effects. They also stated their threshold for accepting antiviral therapy. Five hepatologists used the same scales to estimate their patients' responses.

RESULTS

On average, patients believed that hepatitis C without symptoms was associated with an 11% reduction in preference value from that of life without infection, and the most serious condition (severe symptoms, cirrhosis) was believed to carry a 73% decrement. Patients judged the side effects of antiviral therapy quite unfavorably, and their median stated threshold for accepting treatment was a cure rate of 80%. Physicians' estimates were not significantly associated with patients' preference values for hepatitis C health states, treatment side effects, or with patients' thresholds for accepting treatment. In multivariate analysis, patients' stated thresholds for taking treatment were significantly associated with their decisions regarding therapy (beta = -2.72+/-1.21, p = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

There was little agreement between patients' preference values about hepatitis C and their physicians' estimates of those values. Utility analysis could facilitate shared decision making about hepatitis C.

Physicians' preference values for hepatitis C health states and antiviral therapy: a survey

BACKGROUND

Physicians' perspectives regarding hepatitis C shape their approach to patient management. We used utility analysis to evaluate physicians' perceptions of hepatitis C-related health states (HS) and their threshold to recommend treatment.

METHODS

A written questionnaire was administered to practicing physicians. They were asked to rate hepatitis C health states on a visual analog scale ranging from 0% (death) to 100% (health without hepatitis C). Physicians then judged quality of life associated with the side effects of antiviral therapy for hepatitis C and indicated the sustained virological response rate that they would require to recommend treatment.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirteen physicians from five states were included. Median utility ratings for hepatitis C health states declined significantly with increasing severity of symptoms: HS1-No Symptoms, No Cirrhosis (88%; 12% reduction from good health), HS2-Mild Symptoms, No Cirrhosis (66%), HS3-Moderate Symptoms, No Cirrhosis (49%), HS4-Mild Symptoms, Cirrhosis (40%), HS5-Severe Symptoms, Cirrhosis (18%) [p < 0.001]. The median rating for life with side effects of antiviral therapy was 47%, suggesting a 53% reduction from good health. That was similar to the utility value for HS3-Moderate Symptoms, No Cirrhosis. The median threshold value for recommending treatment was a sustained response rate of 60%.

CONCLUSIONS

1) Physicians' utility ratings for hepatitis C health states were inversely related to the severity of disease manifestations described. 2) Physicians viewed side effects of therapy unfavorably and indicated that on average, they would require a 60% sustained response rate before recommending treatment, which far exceeds the efficacy of current antiviral therapy for hepatitis C in the majority of patients.

Resolution of cirrhosis in autoimmune hepatitis with corticosteroid therapy

Successful therapy for liver diseases, including autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, and hepatitis C, has been associated with a reduction in hepatic fibrosis. Recently, a study of needle liver biopsy specimens documented resolution of cirrhosis in a small group of patients with autoimmune hepatitis who responded to corticosteroid therapy. We describe a woman with autoimmune hepatitis who had cirrhosis on a wedge biopsy of the liver in 1985 and who attained a biochemical response with immunosuppressive therapy. A repeat wedge liver biopsy performed 14 years later was normal, providing unequivocal evidence that cirrhosis can reverse completely in autoimmune hepatitis.

Adult living donor liver transplantation: Preferences about donation outside the medical community

An increasing number of transplant centers are performing adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We evaluated peoples' perspectives on possible outcomes of living donation, thresholds for donating, and views regarding the donation process. One hundred fifty people were surveyed; half were from a medical care group serving an indigent population and half were from a private clinic. Preferences about outcomes of adult living donation were ranked and quantified on a visual analogue scale. Thresholds for donation to a loved one were quantified. Sixty percent of the respondents suggested they would prefer to donate and die and have the transplant recipient live rather than forego donation and have the potential transplant recipient die of liver failure. Participants' stated threshold for living donation was a median survival for themselves of only 79%. They would require that their loved one have a median survival of 55% with transplantation before they would agree to donate. Respondents from the medical care group reported higher survival thresholds for themselves and the transplant recipient, and race was the most statistically significant predictor of those thresholds. Sex was more predictive of threshold probabilities from the private clinic. Eighty-one percent of the respondents believed that the potential donor, not a physician, should have the final say regarding candidacy for living donation. In conclusion, the findings of this survey support the use of adult LDLT. Most respondents were willing to accept mortality rates that far exceed the estimated risk of donation and favored outcomes in which a loved one was saved.

Daily interferon therapy for hepatitis C virus infection in liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus infection persists after liver transplantation and causes recurrent liver injury in the majority of patients. Standard dose interferon therapy has been largely unsuccessful for hepatitis C in transplant recipients.

METHODS

Twelve patients, at least 7 months posttransplant, with detectable hepatitis C virus RNA in serum and features of hepatitis C on liver biopsy were randomized to interferon-alpha2a, 3 mU daily for 12 months (n=8) or no treatment (n=4). The tolerability of daily interferon dosing in liver transplant recipients was evaluated and effects on hepatitis C virus RNA level, quasispecies evolution, and liver histology were studied.

RESULTS

Treated patients had an improvement in histological activity index at the end of therapy relative to controls (median reduction of 2 versus median increase of 1.5) (P=0.04). Four treated patients had a virological response (all bDNA negative, one qualitative polymerase chain reaction negative) compared with none of the untreated patients. Only two of six treated patients tested had evidence of quasispecies diversification on therapy. Seven of eight patients in the treatment group required dose reduction for fatigue and/or depression. They tolerated 1.5 mU of interferon-alpha2a daily. Two treated patients developed graft dysfunction, one of who had histological evidence of rejection and subsequent graft loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Low daily doses of interferon were tolerated by liver transplant recipients and provided histological benefit without associated quasispecies diversification in most cases. These findings provide a rationale to study low dose daily or pegylated interferon maintenance therapy for the management of hepatitis C posttransplant.

Efficacy of endoscopic management of anastomotic biliary strictures after hepatic transplantation

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Anastomotic biliary strictures are the most common cause of biliary obstruction following liver transplantation. We studied the efficacy and safety of endoscopic management of anastomotic strictures retrospectively.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A stricture at choledocho-choledochal anastomosis was identified in 30 of 354 sequential adult liver-transplant recipients at our institution. Balloon dilation was performed in 29 patients and a stent was inserted across the anastomotic stricture in one patient at initial endoscopy. A total of nine patients did not require further treatment; ten had repeated dilation (median 2). A stent was placed for persistent anastomotic stricture in six patients and for other indications in four patients. Outcomes studied were improvement in cholestasis, stricture diameter, and need for surgical treatment. Safety of therapy was assessed with nature and number of procedural complications.

RESULTS

The median serum bilirubin level decreased from 3.25 mg/dl to 1.1 mg/dl (P < 0.001) and median alkaline phosphatase decreased from 451.5 IU/l to 125 IU/l (P = 0.001) following endoscopic therapy. Cholestasis improved in 26 of 30 patients with therapy. Of the remainder, three of three patients with concurrent nonanastomotic strictures and one patient with anastomotic stricture and histologic evidence of rejection showed worsening cholestasis at follow-up. Stricture diameter improved from a median of 2.5 mm to 7 mm (P < 0.001). Median follow-up was 17.9 months from the last therapeutic endoscopy. Five treatable, nonlethal complications occurred after 77 procedures. None of the patients required surgery for anastomotic stricture during a follow-up period up to 58 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic management offers effective and safe treatment for posttransplantation anastomotic biliary strictures and avoids the need for surgical intervention.

Pretreatment symptoms and dosing regimen predict side-effects of interferon therapy for hepatitis C

We analysed data from a multicentre interferon (IFN) treatment trial to evaluate symptoms in patients with chronic hepatitis C and to identify factors that might predict development of debilitating IFN side-effects. Two hundred and twenty-two patients (120 US, 102 French) received 3 or 5 million units (MU) of IFN-alpha three times weekly (t.i.w.) for 3 months. Those who had detectable hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA, as detected by the branched DNA signal amplification (bDNA) assay, at 3 months were intensified to daily therapy, while patients who were bDNA negative continued t.i.w. dosing for the subsequent 3 months of treatment. Symptoms were assessed at baseline, and adverse effects were evaluated at 6 months of therapy. Prior to treatment, the most common symptom that interfered with daily functioning was fatigue, occurring in 25% of patients. The frequency of debilitating fatigue, myalgia, arthralgia, headache, the presence of dry eyes and dry mouth, and use of antidepressant medication increased significantly from baseline to 6 months of IFN therapy (all P < 0.01). In multivariate analysis, the development of a debilitating side-effect at 6 months of treatment was associated with the presence of that symptom prior to therapy in all cases. Symptoms and adverse effects varied by gender and country. Compared with patients maintained on t.i.w. dosing, those who were dose intensified to daily IFN reported more debilitating fatigue, malaise, myalgia, arthralgia, fever, nausea, and headache, and the presence of dry mouth (all P < 0.05). In conclusion, patient characteristics, including pretreatment symptoms, gender and nationality, as well as daily IFN dosing are associated with the development of debilitating adverse effects on IFN therapy.

Hyperbilirubinemia and cholestatic liver injury in hepatitis C-infected liver transplant recipients

OBJECTIVE

A cholestatic pattern of liver injury has been observed in liver transplant recipients with rapidly progressive hepatitis C. We assessed the frequency and causes of cholestasis in hepatitis C-infected liver transplant patients, and evaluated the clinical and pathological course of those with cholestatic hepatitis C.

METHODS

Sixty-nine sequential liver transplant recipients who had detectable hepatitis C viremia were studied retrospectively. Records and diagnostic tests were examined from patients who developed hyperbilirubinemia.

RESULTS

Hyperbilirubinemia occurred in 33 of 69 (48%) hepatitis C-infected liver transplant patients. A thorough evaluation including review of clinical and laboratory data, ultrasound with Doppler, cholangiogram, and liver biopsy identified causes of hyperbilirubinemia other than hepatitis C in 26 of 33 patients. Seven patients developed cholestatic hepatitis C characterized by histological features of recurrent hepatitis C and cholestatic liver injury with ballooning of centrilobular hepatocytes, bile ductular proliferation, and canalicular cholestasis, in the absence of other causes of cholestasis. Five progressed rapidly to bridging fibrosis and two died of complications related to liver failure. Four patients with cholestatic hepatitis C showed extended survival after the onset of hyperbilirubinemia.

CONCLUSIONS

1) Hepatitis C is a relatively infrequent cause of cholestasis in liver transplant recipients. 2) The diagnosis of cholestatic hepatitis C requires a multimodality approach to exclude other causes of cholestasis. 3) Cholestatic hepatitis C ranges in severity and is not always associated with rapid development of graft failure, although significant histological abnormalities are frequent.

In situ distribution of hepatitis C virus replicative-intermediate RNA in hepatic tissue and its correlation with liver disease

Liver failure from chronic hepatitis C is the leading indication for liver transplantation in the United States. However, the pathogenesis of liver injury resulting from chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is not well understood. To examine the relationship between HCV replication in liver tissue and hepatocellular injury, a strand-specific in situ hybridization procedure was developed. The sensitivity and specificity of digoxigenin-labeled riboprobes were optimized by analyzing Northern blots and cell lines expressing HCV RNAs. For the current study, both genomic (sense) and replicative-intermediate (antisense) HCV RNAs were detected and quantified in 8 of 8 liver tissue specimens from infected patients versus 0 of 11 liver tissue specimens from noninfected controls. The distribution pattern for HCV replicative-intermediate RNA in liver was different from that for HCV genomic RNA. HCV genomic RNA was variably distributed throughout infected livers and was located primarily in the cytoplasm of hepatocytes, with some signal in fibroblasts and/or macrophages in the surrounding fibroconnective tissue. However, HCV replicative-intermediate RNA showed a more focal pattern of distribution and was exclusively localized in the cytoplasm of hepatocytes. There was no significant relationship between the distribution pattern for HCV genomic RNA and any indices of hepatocellular injury. However, a highly significant correlation was observed between the percentage of cells staining positive for replicative-intermediate RNA and the degree of hepatic inflammatory activity (P, < 0.0001). Furthermore, the ratio of cells staining positive for HCV replicative-intermediate versus genomic RNA correlated with the histological severity of liver injury (P, 0. 0065), supporting the hypothesis that active replication of HCV in liver tissue may be a significant determinant of hepatocellular injury.

Relationship between iron concentration and hepatitis C virus RNA level in liver tissue

Patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection frequently have increased hepatic iron stores. The role of hepatitis C in hepatic iron deposition is unknown. The authors examined whether there is a relation between hepatitis C virus level in liver tissue and hepatic iron concentration. Forty-two paired samples obtained from the liver explants of five patients who underwent transplantation for liver disease due to hepatitis C were studied. Hepatitis C virus levels were measured at multiple sites within each liver by a branched deoxyribonucleic assay. Measurements of hepatic iron concentration were made at adjacent sites by a colorimetric assay. Random effects modeling showed wide intrahepatic variation in hepatic HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) concentration (variance = 1.2 x 10(4) [mEq/g]2) and hepatic iron concentration (variance = 1.3 x 10(6) [microg/g]2). There was, however, a trend toward an association between the mean HCV level and the mean hepatic iron concentration for each liver (r = 0.30, p = 0.05). In conclusion, HCV level and iron concentration varied within and between cirrhotic livers. Variability in intrahepatic iron concentration was not related to variability in intrahepatic HCV RNA concentration. More studies are needed to determine the cause of variability in hepatic iron and HCV RNA concentration within and between livers in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Hepatitis C virus infection and lung transplantation: a survey of practices

BACKGROUND

Approximately 4 million persons in the United States are chronically infected with hepatitis C and morbidity due to this disease is increasingly observed in transplant recipients. While knowledge of hepatitis C in liver and kidney transplantation is advancing, little information is available concerning hepatitis C and lung transplantation. We surveyed lung transplant programs about policies regarding testing for hepatitis C, transplantation of hepatitis C-infected candidates, and the use of organs from seropositive donors.

METHODS

A written questionnaire was sent to all United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) approved lung transplant programs.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine of 89 (66%) surveys were returned, including 49 from active programs, capturing 81% of lung transplants performed within UNOS prior to January 1998. All programs screen candidates for hepatitis C. The estimated median seropositivity rate among candidates was 1.9%. Thirty-three of 46 (72%) programs consider seropositive patients for transplantation and most use virologic and/or histologic data to determine candidacy. All donors are screened for hepatitis C. Twenty-six of 47 (55%) programs accept lungs from seropositive donors and many restrict the use of organs from seropositive donors to infected recipients. Few programs routinely test recipients for hepatitis C, and policies for monitoring those with known infection are variable.

CONCLUSIONS

Lung transplant candidates and donors are tested routinely for hepatitis C. The majority of programs are willing to accept infected candidates and seropositive donors. Post-transplant follow-up of hepatitis C is variable and prospective studies are needed to evaluate the impact of hepatitis C on lung transplant recipients.

Donor-recipient sharing of HLA class II alleles predicts earlier recurrence and accelerated progression of hepatitis C following liver transplantation

Both direct viral cytopathic effects and host immune responses appear to be important in the pathogenesis of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Liver transplantation provides a means to explore the role of the immune system in the development of HCV-related liver damage through comparing the natural history of HCV in patients with different degrees of donor-recipient human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching. We evaluated 36 patients with recurrent hepatitis C viremia following liver transplantation to determine whether hepatocellular injury or progression to bridging fibrosis occur more rapidly when donor and recipients share HLA alleles. HLA typing for the HLA-A and HLA-B loci was performed by serological techniques and PCR-based oligotyping was used to type alleles of the DRB1, DRB3, DQA1, and DQB1 loci. A median of eight liver biopsies, obtained during a median follow-up of 36 months, were reviewed per patient. Donor-recipient sharing of alleles of HLA-DQB1 or DRB1 was associated with more rapid development of recurrent hepatitis by univariate analysis (chi2=5.7, P=0.02 and chi2=5.54, P=0.02 respectively). However, only sharing of HLA-DRB1 alleles was identified as an independent predictor of reduced time to recurrent histologic injury by multivariate analysis (chi2 =5.74, P=0.02). Furthermore, sharing of HLA-DRB3 and histologic evidence of rejection were associated with more rapid progression to bridging fibrosis both by univariate methods (chi2=4.12, P=0.04 and chi2=4.66, P=0.03 respectively), and by multivariate analysis (chi2=13.01, P=0.001). These findings suggest that HLA class II-restricted immune responses may contribute to the pathogenesis of HCV-related liver injury in liver transplant recipients.

End-stage liver disease without hemochromatosis associated with elevated hepatic iron index

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The utility of standard diagnostic tests for hereditary hemochromatosis in end-stage liver disease is unknown. A homozygous mutation (Cys 282 Tyr) has been identified in most patients with hereditary hemochromatosis. We examined whether serum iron studies and hepatic iron measurement distinguish end-stage liver disease patients with Cys 282 Tyr-associated hereditary hemochromatosis.

METHODS

Serum iron, total iron binding capacity, and ferritin were measured in 106 cirrhotic patients prior to liver transplantation. Hepatic iron concentration and hepatic iron index were measured from explant liver tissue. Genotyping was performed on explant liver tissue in patients with an elevated hepatic iron index (>1.9).

RESULTS

Thirty-three of 106 (31%) patients had elevated serum iron studies suggestive of hereditary hemochromatosis. Only four of 33 (12%) had a mean hepatic iron index >1.9, and none of the four patients was homozygous for Cys 282 Tyr. All four had liver disease due to hepatitis C and/or alcohol.

CONCLUSIONS

(i) Serum transferrin saturation and hepatic iron index lack specificity for hereditary hemochromatosis in end-stage liver disease. (ii) Genotyping for Cys 282 Tyr may provide the best method to identify hereditary hemochromatosis in the setting of end-stage liver disease.

Hepatitis G virus co-infection does not alter the course of recurrent hepatitis C virus infection in liver transplantation recipients

Although hepatitis G virus infection (HGV) is usually asymptomatic, it has been associated with mild hepatic injury. Whether hepatitis G co-infection alters the natural history of other viral hepatitis infections remains to be determined. In the present study, we investigated whether hepatitis G impacts on the time to recurrent hepatitis or on the time to progression to fibrosis in hepatitis C-infected patients who undergo liver transplantation. Forty-five liver transplantation recipients with persistent hepatitis C viremia by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were evaluated. Stored sera obtained before and after liver transplantation was tested for HGV RNA by reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR using primers to the 5' region of the HGV genome. A median of eight serial liver biopsy specimens were reviewed per patient. The prevalence of HGV co-infection was 21% before transplantation and 22% following transplantation. During a median follow-up of 29 months, 78% (35/45) of patients with hepatitis C viremia developed histological features of recurrent hepatitis. Fifty-one percent (23/45) progressed to fibrous portal expansion and 16% (7/45) developed bridging fibrosis. Comparisons of patients with and without hepatitis G co-infection following transplantation showed no significant difference in time to recurrent hepatitis, fibrous portal expansion, bridging fibrosis, or of allograft or patient survival. In conclusion, hepatitis G co-infection does not seem to impact on the time to recurrent hepatitis C or progression of hepatitis C-related histological injury after liver transplantation.

Pancreas-graft immunogenicity and pretreatment with anti-class II monoclonal antibodies

Pretreatment of organ allografts to reduce graft immunogenicity is an attractive and potentially clinically applicable concept. We have studied the effect of perfusing rat pancreases with anti-class II monoclonal antibody (MoAb), to remove class II- positive accessory cells from the intact organ, on prolongation of allograft survival after transplantation. The capacity of pancreatic islets obtained from these perfused organs to stimulate proliferation of allogeneic T-lymphocytes was studied in a mixed islet-lymphocyte culture (MILC). There was a significant prolongation in pancreas-allograft survival when intact pancreases were transplanted after a 3-h normothermic perfusion with MoAb reactive with class II antigens (16.2 +/- 3.6 days, n = 19) compared with control animals (11.0 +/- 1.4 days, n = 24). In vitro treatment of islets with MoAb and complement (CI) inhibited their stimulatory capacity in the MILC, as measured by [3H]thymidine uptake. Similarly, the stimulatory capacity of islets removed from perfused pancreases was also abrogated when MoAb was included in the perfusate. Although reduction in graft immunogenicity, by increasing allograft survival, was achieved by a 3-h pretreatment regimen, it was not sufficient to inhibit rejection altogether in our transplant model.