[Functional outcome of 111 metatarsal fractures following conservative in comparison to operative treatment]

Hintergrund

Mittelfußfrakturen gehören zu einer der häufigsten Verletzungen des Fußes und treten v. a. bei Patienten zwischen dem 40. und 50. Lebensjahr auf. Insbesondere die Verletzung mehrerer Mittelfußknochen kann zu bleibenden Einschränkungen führen, und daher war das Ziel dieser Studie, das funktionelle Outcome von Mittelfußfrakturen mittels eines validierten selbstberichteten patientenbasierten Ergebnisfragebogens zu untersuchen.

Material und Methoden

Im Zeitraum von 2003 bis 2015 wurden alle Patienten mit einer Mittelfußfraktur mit konservativer sowie operativer Behandlung in diese retrospektive Kohortenstudie eingeschlossen. Es wurden demografische Daten, Art der Fraktur (AO-Klassifikation), Behandlung, Reoperationsrate sowie das funktionelle Ergebnis mittels Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) erfasst. Der Mann-Whitney-U-Test und Exakte Fisher-Test wurden bei der statistischen Analyse eingesetzt.

Ergebnisse

Insgesamt wurden in diese Studie 111 Patienten mit 81 isolierten und 30 multiplen Mittelfußfrakturen eingeschlossen. Das Durchschnittsalter der Patienten war 45 ± 15,2 Jahre mit insgesamt 48 Männern (43 %) und 63 Frauen (57 %). Patienten mit isolierter Mittelfußfraktur hatten einen FAOS von 88 ± 17,1. Die Patienten mit multiplen Mittelfußfrakturen erzielten einen FAOS von 78 ± 17,7 (p = 0,046). In der Gruppe der isolierten Mittelfußfrakturen wurden 43 Patienten (53 %) operativ behandelt. Hiervon zeigten 36 Patienten eine C‑Fraktur (84 %). In der Gruppe der multiplen Mittelfußfrakturen wurden 16 Patienten (53 %) operativ behandelt.

Diskussion

Das funktionelle Outcome nach isolierten Mittelfußfrakturen ist sowohl nach operativer als auch konservativer Therapie gut bis sehr gut. Einfache Frakturen lassen sich erfolgreich konservativ und komplexe, mehrfragmentäre Frakturen operativ behandeln. Bei Frakturen von mehr als einem Mittelfußknochen ist das Ergebnis signifikant schlechter, und es bleiben vom Patienten berichtete Einschränkungen zurück.

Tourniquet use in lower limb trauma and fracture surgery

The use of tourniquets in lower limb trauma surgery to control bleeding and improve the surgical field is a long established practice. In this article, we review the evidence relating to harms and benefits of tourniquet use in lower limb fracture fixation surgery and report the results of a survey on current tourniquet practice among trauma surgeons in the UK.

Intraoperative 3D imaging in intraarticular tibial plateau fractures - Does it help to improve the patients' outcomes?

BACKGROUND

In tibial plateau fractures (TPF) the restoration of an anatomical joint surface as well as an exact subchondral screw position for postoperative stability is crucial for the outcome. The aim of this study was to determine whether the additional use of an intraoperative 3D imaging intensifier (3D) might help to improve the outcome of complex TPF.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective case-control study of a level 1 trauma center. Patients with AO/OTA 41 B3 and C-TPF operated on using a 3D imaging intensifier between November 2015 and December 2018 (3D group) were included. The outcomes of this patients were compared to patients operated without 3D imaging between January 2005 to December 2014 (2D group). The comparison of the groups was performed by matched pair analysis. The functional outcome of both groups was measured by KOOS and Lysholm Score after a follow-up period of at least 12 months. Operation time, infections and postoperative revisions were registered.

RESULTS

In total, 18 patients were included in the 3D group (mean age: 51.0± 16.4 years; 12 females) and an equal number of matching partners from the 2D group (mean age: 50.3± 15.2 years; 11 females) were found (p=0.82; p=0.79). We found 9x B3, 2x C1, 1x C2, 6x C3 fractures according to AO/OTA for each group (p=1.00) with comparable ASA score (p=0.27). The mean operation time was 127.9± 45.9 min and 116.1± 45.7 min for the 3D and 2D group (p=0.28). The mean follow-up time was 20.9± 10.7 months for the 3D and 55.5± 34.7 months for the 2D group (p< 0.001). For the 3D group a mean Lysholm overall score of 67.4± 26.8 and KOOS overall score of 72.6± 23.5 could be assessed. In contrast, a mean Lysholm overall score of 62.0± 21.4 and KOOS overall score of 65.8± 21.6 could be measured in the 2D group (p=0.39; p=0.31). Thereby, functional outcome of the 3D group showed a significant higher KOOS Sport/Rec sub score of 54.7± 35.0 in comparison to the 2D group with 26.7± 31.6 (p= 0.01). Postoperative revisions had to be performed in 27.8% of cases in both groups (p=1.00). Due to the 3D imaging an intraoperative revision was performed in 33.3% (6/18).

CONCLUSION

In our study we could show that re-reduction of the fracture or implant re-positioning were performed in relevant numbers based on the 3D imaging. This was associated with a midterm clinical benefit in regard to better KOOS Sport/Rec scores.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

AZ 488 /20-ek.

Comparison of the survivorship between arthroplasty and ORIF for basi-cervical femoral neck fractures in the overall population and in polymorbid patients

BACKGROUND

Femoral neck fractures (FNFs) are associated with high mortality and can be treated with arthroplasty or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). For basi-cervical FNFs, there is no agreement on which procedure is better. Do arthroplasty and open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) have different rates of survival? Do age and comorbidities influence survivorship?

HYPOTHESIS

Patients who underwent arthroplasty and patients who underwent ORIF have different rates of survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Survivorship curves, complications, and hospitalisation length were analysed in 154 patients who received hip arthroplasty, and in 72 patients who received ORIF. Age and ASA score were used to divide the patients into sub-groups and perform secondary analyses.

RESULTS

At 4.9±2.4 years after surgery, 74 patients in the arthroplasty group (48%) and 33 in the ORIF group (45%) had died. The survivorship curves of the two groups showed a non-significant difference. The hospitalisation length was 13.5±8.9 days, with a non-significant difference between groups. There were 130 complications in total: 97 in the arthroplasty patients (19 patients had multiple complications, 52 had only one), 33 in the ORIF patients (4 patients had multiple complications, 29 had only one); the odds ratio was therefore 2.1 (p=0.02). Age, ASA score, Sernbo score, Charlson comorbidity index, and sex (male) were the best predictors of mortality. In the ASA 3-4 sub-group, the survivorship curves showed a lower mortality in the arthroplasty group (p=0.02).

DISCUSSION

Arthroplasty and ORIF are both valid procedures for the treatment of basi-cervical FNFs, but a high mortality rate is associated with either procedures. There is no difference in terms of survivorship between arthroplasty and ORIF in the overall population, but the presence of comorbidities may favour arthroplasty, which should be considered when managing patients with basi-cervical FNFs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; retrospective, observational study.

Open reduction and internal fixation might be a valuable alternative to stem revision in Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures, irrespective of the stem's design

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures versus stem revision (SR) surgery.

METHODS

Between 2004 and 2018, 39 patients were treated with SR and 31 with ORIF for a Vancouver type B2. Mean follow-up was 40.4 months for the ORIF group and 43.5 months for the SR group. 22 of 31 stems in the ORIF group were uncemented, of which 7 (23%) were short stems. Perioperative complications, intraoperative blood loss, revision rate, and mortality were recorded. Functional outcomes included Harris Hip Score, Parker Mobility Score and hip abductor strength.

RESULTS

Both groups did not differ in the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, Charlson comorbidity index, body mass index, age, and sex. Compared to SR, patients treated with ORIF had a decreased blood loss, transfusion rate, operation duration, and mortality. Total complication and re-operation rates were similar. The relative risk for complication and re-operation was 0.5 and 0.7, respectively, in favour of ORIF.

CONCLUSIONS

ORIF might be a valuable alternative to SR in the treatment of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic fractures with shorter operation duration, lower blood loss and similar complication rate compared to SR. Moreover, re-stabilization seems possible irrespective of stem's design or fixation technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

The risks associated with tourniquet use in lower limb trauma surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

Tourniquet use in lower limb fracture surgery may reduce intra-operative bleeding, improve surgical field of view and reduce length of procedure. However, tourniquets may result in pain and the production of harmful metabolites cause complications or affect functional outcomes. This systematic review aimed to compare outcomes following lower limb fracture surgery performed with or without tourniquet.

Methods

We searched databases for RCTs comparing lower limb fracture surgery performed with versus without tourniquet reporting on outcomes pain, physical function, health-related quality of life, complications, cognitive function, blood loss, length of stay, length of procedure, swelling, time to union, surgical field of view, volume of anaesthetic agent, biochemical markers of inflammation and injury, and electrolyte and acid–base balance. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed. PROSPERO ID CRD42020209310.

Results

Six RCTs enabled inclusion of 552 procedures. Pooled analysis demonstrated that tourniquet use reduced length of procedure by 6 minutes (95% CI −10.12 to −1.87; p < 0.010). We were unable to exclude increased harms from tourniquet use. Pooled analysis showed post-operative pain score was higher in tourniquet group by 12.88 on 100-point scale (95% CI −1.25–27.02; p = 0.070). Risk differences for wound infection, deep venous thrombosis and re-operation were 0.06 (95% CI −0.00–0.12; p = 0.070), 0.05 (95% CI −0.02–0.11; p = 0.150) and 0.03 (95% CI -0.03–0.09; p = 0.340).

Conclusion

Tourniquet use was associated with a reduced length of procedure. It is possible that tourniquets also increase incidence of important complications, but the data are too sparse to draw firm conclusions. Methodological weaknesses of the included RCTs prevent any solid conclusions being drawn for outcomes investigated. Further studies are required to address these limitations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00590-021-02957-7.

ORIF versus MIPO for humeral shaft fractures: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized clinical trials and observational studies

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on the optimal operative technique for humeral shaft fractures. This meta-analysis aims to compare minimal-invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) for humeral shaft fractures regarding non-union, re-intervention, radial nerve palsy, time to union, operation duration and functional outcomes.

METHODS

PubMed/Medline/Embase/CENTRAL/CINAHL were searched for both randomized clinical trials (RCT) and observational studies comparing MIPO with ORIF for humeral shaft fractures. Effect estimates were pooled across studies using random effects models and presented as weighted odds ratio (OR), risk difference (RD), mean difference (MD) and standardized mean difference (SMD) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (95%CI). Subgroup analysis was performed stratified by study design (RCTs and observational studies).

RESULTS

A total of two RCT's (98 patients) and seven observational studies (263 patients) were included. The effect estimates obtained from observational studies and RCT's were similar in direction and magnitude. MIPO carries a lower risk for non-union (RD: 5%; OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.9) and secondary radial nerve palsy (RD 5%; OR 0.3, 95%CI 0.1- 0.9). Nerve function eventually restored spontaneously in all patients in both groups. Results were inconclusive regarding re-intervention (RD 7%; OR: 0.7, 95%CI 0.2-1.9), infection (RD 4%; OR 0.4, 95%CI 0.1-1.5), time to union (MD -1 week, 95%CI -3 - 1) and operation duration (MD -13 minutes, 95%CI -38.9 - 11.9). Functional shoulder scores (SMD 0.01, 95%CI -0.3 - 0.3) and elbow scores (SMD 0.01, 95%CI -0.3 - 0.3) were similar for the different operative techniques.

CONCLUSION

MIPO has a lower risk for non-union than ORIF for the treatment of humeral shaft fractures. Radial nerve palsy secondary to operation is a temporary issue resolving in all patients in both treatment groups. Although both treatment options are viable, the general balance leans towards MIPO having more favorable outcomes.

Arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation (ARIF) versus open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) to elucidate the difference for tibial side PCL avulsion fixation: a randomized controlled trial (RCT)

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical, radiological outcomes, economic and technical differences for ORIF by cancellous screw fixation versus ARIF by double-tunnel suture fixation for displaced tibial-side PCL avulsion fractures.

METHODS

Forty patients with displaced tibial-sided PCL avulsions were operated upon after randomizing them into two groups (20 patients each in the open and arthroscopic group) and followed up prospectively. Assessment included duration of surgery, cost involved, pre- and post-operative functional scores, radiological assessment of union, and posterior laxity using stress radiography and complications.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 33 months (27-42) (open group) and 30 months (26-44) (arthroscopic group). The duration of surgery was significantly larger in the arthroscopic group (47.8 ± 17.9 min) as compared to the open group (33.4 ± 10.1 min). The costs involved were significantly higher in the arthroscopic group (p- 0.01). At final follow-up, knee function in the form of IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee) evaluation (89.9 ± 4.8-open and 89.3 ± 5.9-arthroscopic) and Lysholm scores (94.2 ± 4.1-open and 94.6 ± 4.1-arthroscopic) had improved significantly with the difference (n.s.) between the two groups. The mean posterior tibial displacement was 5.7 ± 1.8 mm in the open group and 6.3 ± 3.1 mm in the arthroscopic group which was (n.s.). There were two non-unions and one popliteal artery injury in the arthroscopic group.

CONCLUSION

Both ARIF and ORIF for PCL avulsion fractures yield good clinical and radiological outcomes. However, ORIF was better than ARIF in terms of cost, duration of surgery, and complications like non-union and iatrogenic vascular injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Return to Play After Low-Energy Lisfranc Injuries in High-Demand Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Athletes and Active Military Personnel

Background

Although studies are available on high-energy Lisfranc injuries, the evidence for increasingly reported low-energy Lisfranc injuries in active individuals, including athletes and military personnel, remains scarce and mostly retrospective.

Purpose

This meta-analysis aimed to review the return-to-play (RTP) and return-to-duty (RTD) rates with regard to the anatomic type and the management of low-energy Lisfranc injuries in a high-demand, active population.

Study Design

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we searched the MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases through June 2019 to identify studies on low-energy Lisfranc injuries in athletes and military personnel. The primary outcomes were RTP/RTD rates and time to RTP/RTD, and the secondary outcomes were time missed from practice, games missed, time to full recovery, midfoot arthritis rate, and reoperation rate.

Results

Overall, 15 studies (N = 441 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Of these, 6 studies were of level 3 evidence, 8 studies were level 4 (case series), and 1 study was level 5. Of the 441 subjects, 380 (86.17%) were able to RTP and RTD. There was no statistically significant difference in RTP rates for operative versus nonoperative treatment, ORIF versus PA, or bony versus ligamentous injuries. The mean time missed from practice/duty for operative versus nonoperative treatment was 58.02 days (95% CI, 13.6-102.4 days; I ² = 98.03%) and 116.4 days (95% CI, 62.4-170.4 days; I ² = 99.45%), respectively. The mean time missed from practice/duty for bony versus ligamentous injury was 98.9 days (95% CI, 6.1-191.7 days; I ² = 99.82%) and 76.5 days (95% CI, 37.9-115.02 days; I ² = 99.83%), respectively, with no statistically significant differences (standardized mean difference = 3.62 days [95% CI: -5.7 to 13 days]; I ² = 83.17%).

Conclusion

This review indicated an overall excellent RTP/RTD rate for low-energy Lisfranc injuries in high-demand individuals. The time missed from athletic participation/military duty was not affected by injury treatment type, the bony versus ligamentous nature of the injury, or athlete player position. However, the low evidence levels and significant heterogeneity of the included studies precludes making conclusions regarding length of time missed or optimal management. Higher-quality studies on low-energy Lisfranc injuries are needed.

More Adverse Events after Osteosyntheses Compared to Arthroplasty in Geriatric Proximal Humeral Fractures Involving Anatomical Neck

The purpose of this study was to compare adverse events and clinical outcomes of geriatric proximal humerus fractures (PHF) involving the anatomical neck (type C according to AO classification) treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using locking plate vs. arthroplasty. In this retrospective cohort study, geriatric patients (>64 years) who underwent operative treatment using ORIF or arthroplasty for type C PHFs were included. Complications, revisions and clinical outcomes using Constant Murley Score (CMS) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score were assessed and compared between groups. At a mean follow up of 2.7 ± 1.7 years, 59 patients (mean age 75.3 ± 5.5 years) were included. In 31 patients ORIF was performed and 29 patients underwent arthroplasty. Complications and revision surgeries were significantly more frequent after ORIF (32.6% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.023 and 29.0% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.045). In contrast, clinical outcomes showed no significant differences (DASH 39.9 ± 25.7 vs. 39.25 ± 24.5, p = 0.922; CMS 49.7 ± 29.2 vs. 49.4 ± 25.2, p = 0.731). ORIF of type C PHFs in geriatric patients results in significantly more complications and revision surgery when compared to arthroplasty. Therefore, osteosynthesis of geriatric intraarticular fractures of the proximal humerus must be critically evaluated.

The treatment of isolated Mason type II radial head fractures: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Fractures of the radial head represent the most common bony injury of the elbow in adults. Radial head fractures are classified according to Mason or one of its classification modifications. Current literature does not indicate consensus on whether to treat isolated stable type II radial head fracture patterns with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or nonoperatively, especially, when there is no mechanical block to motion.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed the available literature searching electronic databases, that is, MEDLINE using the PubMed interface and Embase, for studies published between 2011 and 2020. The primary objective was to contrast the outcome scores of these 2 different study groups and the pitfalls accompanied with the 2 different approaches. The PRISMA guidelines were applied.

RESULTS

The literature search left 11 studies for inclusion, all but 1 retrospective in design, comprising 319 patients. A total of 218 patients (68.3%) were treated with ORIF and 101 patients (31.7%) were treated nonoperatively. Our findings indicate that ORIF does not provide better results when compared to nonoperatively treated patients concerning functional outcome parameters. Treatment success, defined as excellent or good results according to the Mayo Elbow Performance Score or the Broberg and Morrey score, among the patients treated with ORIF was 90.9%; 7.1% were in need of subsequent surgery and 5.2% had radiologic osteoarthritic changes of the radial column. In addition, 95.1% of the nonoperative cohort were treated successfully, and osteoarthritis was present in 11.9%. Mean follow-up period of the ORIF and the nonoperative cohort was 73 and 39 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

ORIF and nonoperative treatment of isolated Mason type II radial head fractures provide comparably satisfactory functional outcomes, without significant differences. Consideration of age, activity level and potential risks is recommended before making any treatment decision. Subsequent surgery rates were higher for patients treated with ORIF than for those treated nonoperatively and should be discussed. However, development of osteoarthritis of the radial column appears to be more likely after nonoperative treatment. The study pool remains limited, and implications of this review should be handled with caution.

Effects of trochlear fragmentation on functional outcome in coronal shear fractures: a retrospective comparative study

Background

Coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus are rare injuries, and fragmentation of the capitellum and trochlea with posterior comminution is challenging for surgeons. We retrospectively evaluated the functional outcomes of patients with coronal shear fractures managed with open reduction and internal fixation, focusing on the number of trochlea fragments in Dubberley type 3B fractures.

Materials and methods

The functional outcomes of 25 patients, including 8 patients with type 3B fractures, with a mean age (and standard deviation) of 57 ± 20 years, were evaluated at a mean follow-up duration of 15 ± 9 months. Type 3B fractures were classified into two groups: those with two trochlea fragments or less group (group A) and those with three or more fragments (group B). Patient outcomes were assessed with clinical and radiographic examination, range of motion, and the Mayo Elbow Performance scale (MEPS).

Results

Two patients with type 3B in group B experienced nonunion, and two patients with type 3B in group A and 1 patient with type 1B demonstrated avascular necrosis on radiographs. The average MEPS score was 96.3 points (range, 70-100), with 18 excellent, 5 good, and 1 fair results. The average range of motion was 10 ± 8 to 130 ± 12. The MEPS score worsened as Dubberley classification progressed from type 1 to type 3 (98.3 vs. 96.7 vs. 88, P = .014, respectively) and subtypes A to B (97.9 vs. 90, P = .014, respectively). In comparing groups A and B, the MEPS score was significantly worse in group B (93.8 vs. 76.3, P = .006).

Conclusion

Our open reduction and internal fixation results were largely good, although functional outcomes were diminished as Dubberley classification progressed from type 1 to type 3 and subtype A to B. Type 3B fractures with three trochlea fragments or more in the elderly were the most difficult to treat with open reduction and internal fixation and possibly 1-term total elbow arthroplasty.

Quick-DASH as a main early outcome of humeral shaft fractures: A Latin American multicenter prospective study

PURPOSE

The main objective of this study was to evaluate the Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (DASH) score as the main early (90 days) outcome in a prospective multicenter observational Latin American study on isolated humeral shaft fractures.

METHODS

From December 2015 to April 2017, in six Latin American countries, patients 18 years or older with a closed, isolated nonpathological 12A, 12B, or 12C AO/OTA (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association) fractures were included. The 90 (±10)-day Quick-DASH score was used to compare the results of the different treatments. The secondary outcomes were patient treatment satisfaction, shoulder and elbow range of motion, and radiographic evaluation.

RESULTS

A total of 92 patients successfully completed the Quick-DASH questionnaire. Surgical treatments resulted in better outcomes than nonsurgical treatment, but only minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis produced significantly lower Quick-DASH scores than nonsurgical treatment (p < 0.05). There were strong correlations between patient self-evaluation and the Quick-DASH score (p < 0.0005) but not between the Quick-DASH score and radiographic fracture healing. No significant difference was found between the treatments regarding the rate of return to work, but the medical center had a significant influence on treatment choice (p < 0.0005).

CONCLUSION

The high correlation between Quick-DASH score and patient satisfaction and functional outcome indicates that the Quick-DASH questionnaire is a suitable tool for evaluating adult humeral shaft fracture outcomes. Patients with a Quick-DASH score below 15 could be considered recovered, and patients with a Quick-DASH score above 40 could be considered not yet recovered. Quick-DASH scores were not significantly associated with radiographic fracture healing.

Long dorsal "Y-shaped" plate for distal diaphyseal humeral fractures

BACKGROUND

Osteosynthesis of distal diaphyseal humeral fractures is challenging, especially if there is a metaphyseal extension of the fracture line with a butterfly third fragment or if the fracture is bifocal. These fractures put the radial nerve at risk at the time of the fracture and during surgery. We hypothesize that ORIF with a long dorsal Y-plate matching the dorsal aspects of the humeral diaphysis and of the two metaphyseal columns would provide a reliable method of fixation for distal diaphyseal humeral fractures even when there is a metaphyseal extension or bifocal component.

METHODS

Between 2015 and 2019, 17 distal diaphyseal humeral fractures in 17 consecutive patients (14 men, 3 women, mean age 38 years) were operated on with a long "Y-shaped" dorsal plate. There were two bifocal fractures and 11 diaphyso-metaphyseal fractures with butterfly fragments. All 17 patients could be retrospectively followed up clinically and radiographically at a mean follow-up of 25 months (min 4, max 40). Clinical charts included VAS pain, elbow range of motion, QuickDASH, MEPS and subjective elbow value.

RESULTS

Bone healing was observed in all cases. Five patients (29%) had a pre-operative radial nerve palsy. All pre-operative radial nerve palsies but one recovered spontaneously. One complete radial nerve palsy that was not present before the operation was observed after surgery. It recovered spontaneously in four months. One case of post-operative elbow stiffness required a revision. Only one case (5%) showing a complication directly related to the plate (secondary displacement) required revision. Mean post-operative elbow flexion was 134°. Extension deficit averaged 13°. Subjective elbow value, QuickDASH and MEPS averaged respectively 81%, 19 points and 92 points.

DISCUSSION

Currently available plates (long dorsal straight, short dorsal "Y-shaped", long lateral) may have limitations in terms of screw purchase or biomechanical efficiency when ORIF of distal diaphyseal humeral fractures is considered. A long dorsal "Y-shaped" plate is a new alternative which may be successfully used even in the most difficult cases.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that a long dorsal "Y-shaped" plate is suitable for distal diaphyseal humeral fractures especially when there is a metaphyseal bifocal or third fragment component.

Modified application of distal medial tibial locking plate as an alternative for fixation of an extraarticular distal-third diaphyseal humerus fracture

Introduction

Surgical management of Extraarticular Distal-third diaphyseal Humerus Fracture (EADHF) poses a dilemma in terms of surgical approach, implant selection and position of the implant due to the availability of various pre-contoured implants and plate configurations. Various studies have described a modified application of anatomic locking plates as a satisfactory method of fixation in the surgical management of EADHF.

Case presentation

This report discusses the modified application of anatomic Distal Medial Tibial locking Plate (DMTP) as an alternative strategy in fixation of an acute extraarticular distal-third diaphyseal fracture of the humerus in a 45-years-old female patient. Bony union was achieved successfully without any malalignment and the patient showed a full recovery with an excellent clinical and outcome at 2-years follow-up.

Conclusion

In EADHF, the use of 3.5 mm DMTP is advantageous as it offers rigid fixation by insertion of more number of 3.5 mm locking bicortical screws and stability in both columns. This promotes biological fracture healing, low rate of complication, early return to work with improvement in clinical function. Therefore, we recommend that pre-contoured 3.5 mm DMTP can be successfully used as an alternative fixation choice for the treatment of EADHF.

Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty After Acetabular Open Reduction and Internal Fixation in the Elderly-Acute vs Delayed Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Optimum management for the elderly acetabular fracture remains undefined. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in this population does not allow early weight-bearing and has an increased risk of failure. This study aimed to define outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the setting of an acetabular fracture and compared delayed THA after acetabular ORIF (ORIF delayed THA) and acute fixation and THA (ORIF acute THA).

METHODS

All acetabular fractures in patients older than 60 years who underwent ORIF between 2007 and 2018 were reviewed (n = 85). Of those, 14 underwent ORIF only initially and required subsequent THA (ORIF delayed THA). Twelve underwent an acute THA at the time of the ORIF (ORIF acute THA). The ORIF acute THA group was older (81 ± 7 vs 76 ± 8; P < .01) but had no other demographic- or injury-related differences compared with the ORIF delayed THA group. Outcome measures included operative time, length of stay, complications, radiographic assessments (component orientation, leg-length discrepancy, heterotopic ossification), and functional outcomes using the Oxford Hip Score (OHS).

RESULTS

Operative time (P = .1) and length of stay (P = .5) for the initial surgical procedure (ORIF only or ORIF THA) were not different between groups. Four patients had a complication and required further surgeries; no difference was seen between groups. Radiographic assessments were similar between groups. The ORIF acute THA group had a significantly better OHS (40.1 ± 3.9) than the ORIF delayed THA group (33.6 ± 8.5) (P = .03).

CONCLUSION

In elderly acetabulum fractures, ORIF acute THA compared favorably (a better OHS, single operation/hospital visit, equivalent complications) with ORIF delayed THA. We would thus recommend that in patients with risk factors for failure requiring delayed THA (eg, dome or roof impaction) that ORIF acute THA be strongly considered.

Pain Management following Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures

Background  Distal radius fractures (DRF) are commonly treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Few studies address perioperative and postoperative pain control for this procedure. Questions/Purpose  We attempt to demonstrate efficacy of pain management modalities during the perioperative and acute postoperative period after ORIF. Specifically, does the type of perioperative anesthesia used during fixation of DRF affect pain control postoperatively? Does the quantity of narcotic pain medication prescribed or type of pain medication given postoperatively affect pain management? Methods  We retrospectively reviewed 294 adult (≥18 years old) patients who underwent outpatient ORIF of acute DRF between December 2012 and December 2014. All procedures were performed with a standard volar plating technique through a flexor carpi radialis approach. Patient demographics, fracture laterality, severity of fracture, type of operative anesthesia, and details regarding postoperative oral pain medications were recorded. We reviewed the number and timing of patient phone calls regarding postoperative pain and refills of pain prescriptions. Results  Two-hundred ninety-four patients (average age 48.7 years) were included. One-hundred twenty-two injuries were right-sided (41.5%), 168 were left-sided (57.1%), and four were bilateral (1.4%). One-hundred fifty-one patients (51.4%) received regional anesthesia prior to surgery. Average number of narcotics tablets prescribed was 58. There were 66 patients who called the orthopaedic patient hotline regarding pain-control issues at a median of 7.0 days postoperatively. One-hundred twenty-nine (43.9%) patients required refills of narcotic pain medication postoperatively. There was no significant difference in the number of calls or refills given with regard to the type of anesthesia used or postoperative pain regimen prescribed. Conclusions  More than one-fifth of patients who underwent ORIF experienced pain severe enough to call our institution's orthopaedic hotline to ask for help at a median of 7 days after fixation. Clinical Relevance  Our study demonstrates poor pain control regardless of intraoperative anesthesia or utilization of varying postoperative pain regimens.

Double fractures of the femur: a review of 16 patients

BACKGROUND

Double ipsilateral femoral fractures account for 1-9% of femoral fractures. There is no clear advantage between single or double implant osteosynthesis. We present a series of patients with double ipsilateral femoral fractures, to address the challenges in treatment, namely the implants for osteosynthesis and complications of treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively studied 16 patients (7 men, 9 women; mean age, 51 years) treated from January 2015 to December 2018. Motor vehicle accidents were the leading cause of injury. Types of fractures were pertrochanteric and shaft (6), pertrochanteric and distal (2), double shaft (3), neck and shaft (2), neck and distal (1), shaft and distal (1), and triple fracture including a pertrochanteric, shaft and distal (1). In five patients, two different implants were used (plate and screws, cannulated hip screws, femoral nail), whereas in 11 patients a long femoral nail was used.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients experienced union at a mean of 3 months (2-6 months). Two patients experienced nonunion: both had plate and screws osteosynthesis. One patient died 15 days after admission from polytrauma and another patient experienced central venous catheter thrombosis and pneumonia. Surgical complications (2 patients) included a thigh skin necrosis, and external fixator pin tract infection/infected non-union. Weight-bearing was delayed in all patients; full weight-bearing was allowed in 11 patients at 4 months postoperatively, and in four patients at 5 months.

CONCLUSION

Due to the rarity and the difficulty of standardization of double ipsilateral femoral fractures, there is variable information on the optimal osteosynthesis of the fractures and the outcome of the patients. It seems that closed reduction and long hip nailing is the treatment of choice, with few complications.

Neglected Fractures of the Lateral Humeral Condyle in Children; Which Treatment for Which Condition?

Background: Neglected fractures of the lateral humeral condyle (LHC) are misdiagnosed or insufficiently treated fractures, presenting later than 3 weeks after injury. The management of neglected LHC fractures in children remains controversial. Methods: Twenty-seven children were included in this retrospective study. Charts and medical records were investigated for demographics, time interval between injury and treatment, and type of treatment. Baseline radiographs were assessed for fracture grading and displacement. Final radiographs were investigated for bone healing, avascular necrosis, elbow deformities and growth disturbances. Complications were classified by the Clavien–Dindo–Sink (CDS) system. Outcomes were assessed according to the Dhillon Score (DhiS) and Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). Results: The mean time from injury to presentation was 27 months. Treatments included nonoperative management (6 patients), “in-situ” fixation (7 patients), open reduction and internal fixation (11 patients) and corrective osteotomy (3 patients). The mean follow-up was 7 years (range: 2–16). Overall, we observed complications in 16 patients (59%); six complications were considered major (22%) and occurred in Weiss Grade 3 fractures, with lateral displacement ≥5 mm. At the latest follow-up, pain and functional scores improved in 23 of 27 patients (85%). Mean MEPS increased from an average of 62 points preoperatively to 98 points postoperatively, while mean DhiS improved on average from 5 to 8 points. CDS score and time interval between injury and treatment were independent predictors of MEPS and DhiS. Conclusion: Our study describes outcomes from a cohort of children undergoing different treatments for neglected LHC fractures. Prolonged time interval between injury and treatment and perioperative major complications negatively impacted the treatment outcomes. Our findings strengthen the requirement for widely agreed guidelines of surgical management in neglected LHC fractures.

Predicting reoperation after operative treatment of proximal humerus fractures

PURPOSE

The current understanding of the factors associated with a second surgery or loss of alignment after operative treatment of a proximal humerus fracture has relied on small sample studies with stepwise regression analysis. In this study, we used a powerful regression analysis over a large sample and with many variables to test the null hypothesis that there are no factors associated with a revision surgery or loss of alignment after operative treatment of proximal humerus fractures.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all surgically treated proximal humerus fractures from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2015, was performed at a tertiary level hospital. We extracted longitudinal medical records for all patients, and the data were organized into two categories of predictors: fracture/operative characteristics and patient characteristics.

RESULTS

During the study period, 423 patients met the inclusion criteria. Three hundred and fourteen of the fractures underwent Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF) and 109 underwent Hemiarthroplasty. Thirty-three patients underwent revision surgery (8%). Seventy-nine patients treated with ORIF had loss of alignment (25%). Across the entire cohort, the least absolute shrinkage selection operator (LASSO) analysis found that patients between 40 and 60 years of age had a higher odds of revision surgery (OR = 1.6). In patients treated with ORIF, the LASSO regression found an unreduced calcar to be the strongest predictor of loss of alignment (OR = 5.5), followed by osteoporosis (OR = 1.3), prior radiation treatment (OR = 1.3), unreduced greater tuberosity (OR = 1.2) and age over 80 years (OR = 1.2).

CONCLUSION

Reoperation after proximal humerus surgery is infrequent even though loss of alignment is common. In our cohort, not all patients who had a loss of alignment underwent revision surgery; consequently, obtaining the best possible reduction at the index surgery is paramount.

Isolated Shear Fracture of the Metatarsal Head in Lesser Toes Treated With ORIF: Case Series

BACKGROUND

Isolated shear fractures of a metatarsal head in the lesser toes are rare in clinical practice. We report the clinical and imaging characteristics, and treatment results, of these fractures.

METHODS

A retrospective consecutive case-series study was performed on 7 patients with symptomatic isolated shear fracture of a metatarsal head in the lesser toes who were operatively treated using open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Radiographs and computed tomographic (CT) scans of the patients were analyzed. The American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society-lesser metatarsophalangeal-interphalangeal (AOFAS-LMI) score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, and passive dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM) of the metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint were determined preoperatively and at final follow-up. Postoperative complications were also recorded.

RESULTS

There were 5 males and 2 females, with a mean age of 21 years (range, 16-36) at the time of surgery. Four fractures occurred at the fourth metatarsal. There were 3 chronic cases, 1 was not diagnosed initially; the other 2 failed conservative treatment. The main symptom of the chronic fractures was limited dorsiflexion at the MTP joint. Preoperative radiographs and CT scans revealed dorsal displacement of the fragment without dislocation of the MTP joint. At the final follow-up (mean, 17.4 months; range 9-27), the AOFAS-LMI scores had improved from 70.6 (range, 59-79) preoperatively to 93.3 (range, 92-100) (P = .001). VAS scores showed a decrease in pain from 4.0 to 0.0 (P = .016). Mean passive dorsiflexion ROM of the MTP joint improved significantly from 8.6 degrees preoperatively to 35.7 degrees at final follow-up (P < .001). All patients returned to their respective preinjury activity levels.

CONCLUSION

Patients with an acute or chronic isolated shear fracture of a metatarsal head in the lesser toes treated by ORIF achieved good short-term clinical and radiologic outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Nationwide Analysis of Lower Extremity Periprosthetic Fractures

BACKGROUND

Although the annual incidence of primary total joint arthroplasty is increasing, trends in the annual incidence of periprosthetic fractures have not been established. This study aimed to define the annual incidence of periprosthetic fractures in the United States.

METHODS

Inpatient admission data for 60,887 surgically treated lower extremity periprosthetic fractures between 2006 and 2015 were obtained from the National Inpatient Sample database. The annual incidence of periprosthetic fractures was defined as the number of new cases per year and presented as a population-adjusted rate per 100,000 US individuals. Univariable methods were used for trend analysis and comparisons between groups.

RESULTS

The national annual incidence of periprosthetic fractures presented as a population-adjusted rate of new cases per year peaked in 2008 (2.72; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.39-3.05), remained stable from 2010 (1.65; 95% CI, 1.45-1.86) through 2013 (1.67; 95% CI, 1.55-1.8) and increased in 2014 (1.99; 95% CI, 1.85-2.13) and 2015 (2.47; 95% CI, 2.31-2.62). The proportion of femoral periprosthetic fractures managed with total knee arthroplasty revision remained stable (P_trend = .97) with an increase in total hip arthroplasty (THA) revision (P_trend < .001) and concurrent decrease in open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) (P_trend < .001). Revision THA was significantly more costly than revision total knee arthroplasty (P = .004), and both were significantly more costly than ORIF (P < .001 for both).

CONCLUSION

The annual incidence of periprosthetic fractures remained relatively stable throughout our study period. The proportion of periprosthetic fractures managed with revision THA increased, whereas ORIF decreased. Our findings are encouraging considering the significant burden an increase in periprosthetic fracture incidence would present to the health care system in terms of both expense and patient morbidity.

RETRACTED: A Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Plating with Intramedullary Nailing for Extra-articular Distal Tibial Fractures

This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal). Injury was alerted to concerns regarding similarities of the data of this study to those published in the FixDIT UK trial.1 The investigators were invited to reply to the issues raised and were also asked to provide their original dataset available to the Editor-in-Chief. After several communications, the authors were not in a position to submit their original dataset to the Journal. Consequently, this article has been retracted at the request of the Editor-in-Chief due to serious scientific and ethical concerns relating to the integrity of the data collected and included in this study. 1. Costa ML, Achten J, Griffin J, Petrou S, Pallister I, Lamb SE, Parsons NR; FixDT Trial Investigators Effect of Locking Plate Fixation vs Intramedullary Nail Fixation on 6-Month Disability Among Adults With Displaced Fracture of the Distal Tibia: The UK FixDT Randomized Clinical Trial. .JAMA. 2017 Nov 14;318(18):1767-1776.

Evaluation of an expectation and outcome measurement questionnaire in ankle fracture patients: The Trauma Expectation Factor Trauma Outcomes Measure (TEFTOM) Eurasia study

BACKGROUND

The Trauma Expectation Factor Trauma Outcomes Measure (TEFTOM) questionnaire is a self-administered, patient-rated outcome measurement questionnaire designed to measure both 'expectation' and 'outcome' in orthopaedic trauma patients using two subsets of 10 items. We aimed to validate this instrument in a culturally diverse cohort of patients recruited from Asian and European regions.

METHODS

A total of 193 adult patients with surgically treated AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association types 43 and 44 ankle malleolar and distal tibia fractures were recruited with 158 followed up till 1 year. Expectations were assessed prior to surgery, at 2 weeks and after 6 months using the trauma expectation factor (TEF) score. Outcomes were evaluated at 2 weeks, 6 and 12 months using the trauma outcome measure (TOM), American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS) and short form-36 (SF-36) questionnaires. Psychometric properties of TEFTOM were assessed.

RESULTS

TEF and TOM demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's α > 0.87) and reliability at all time points (intra-class correlation coefficients > 0.90). TOM showed strong correlations (R² ≥ 0.60) with the AAOS foot and ankle score, all FAOS subscales, except 'symptoms' and SF-36 physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, social functioning and the physical component summary at 6 and 12 months. Effect sizes for TOM were 2.30 and 0.74 from 2 weeks to 6 months and from 6 months to 12 months, respectively. The baseline patient TEF was predictive for the 1-year TOM score.

CONCLUSIONS

TEFTOM demonstrated good psychometric properties in this cohort of patients with ankle fractures. The TEF 'expectation' score was predictive of the TOM 'outcome' score. We recommend researchers and clinicians to utilize TEFTOM when patient expectation measurement is concerned for orthopaedic trauma patients.

Surgical management of 2- or 3-part proximal humeral fractures: comparison of plate, nail and K-wires

Background

Proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) are fairly common injuries, and their treatment is a challenge. The aim of this study is to compare clinical and functional outcomes of different osteosynthesis techniques.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients’ files and the hospital’s digital database between March 2002 and April 2018. We treated surgically 148 patients with 2- and 3-part PHFs: 64 with plate and screws, 53 with intramedullary nailing and 31 with retrograde K-wires. We constituted three groups according to the type of treatment and two subgroups for each according to the number of fragments (Neer II or Neer III). Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and Short Form-12 (SF-12) scores were recorded.

Results

Mean DASH and SF-12 scores both from the group treated with plate (Group I) and the one subjected to intramedullary nailing (Group II) were statistically superior to results from the patients treated by retrograde K-wires (Group III), while nails showed better functional results than the locking plates. In the first two groups, no difference was found between Neer II and III subgroups, while in Group III the DASH scores were significantly better in Neer II subgroup than those in Neer III subgroup. Avascular necrosis was the most frequent cause of revision surgery in Group I (4 cases) where we had 8 cases of reintervention (12.5%). In Group II, the subacromial impingement was the only cause for revision surgery with 3 cases (5.6%).

Conclusions

Intramedullary nails showed better functional results and a lower complication rate than the locking plates. Both techniques showed superior results compared to those available with retrograde K-wires. So the nail seems to be a more reliable and adequate method for treating 2- and 3-part proximal humeral fractures.