Use of urine-based markers for detection and monitoring of bladder cancer

Diagnosis and monitoring of bladder cancer present a difficult clinical problem. Urine cytology with confirmatory cystoscopy form the cornerstone of diagnosis at the present time. The subjectivity and low sensitivity of cytology led to the development of numerous tests as adjuncts to cystoscopy for the diagnosis and follow-up of bladder cancer patients. These tests usually are objective, quantitative (NMP-22, BTA TRAK, BLCA-4, telomerase activity, etc.), or qualitative (BTA Stat and FDP) and have higher sensitivity than cytology, but some have lower specificity. We review the different, new urine-based tests that were developed recently for the diagnosis and monitoring of patients with bladder cancer. The advantages and disadvantages of these tests are discussed, as well as their possible future role in the management of patients with bladder cancer.

Comparative sensitivity of urinary CYFRA 21-1, urinary bladder cancer antigen, tissue polypeptide antigen, tissue polypeptide antigen and NMP22 to detect bladder cancer

PURPOSE

We compare the individual and combined sensitivity of urinary CYFRA 21-1, urinary bladder cancer antigen, tissue polypeptide antigen and NMP22 to detect bladder cancer, evaluate the false-positive rates for different pathological conditions, and assess differential sensitivity regarding histological and clinical characteristics of disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 267 subjects entered the study. Sensitivities of the tests were evaluated in 111 patients with active bladder cancer and 76 with no evidence of disease. False-positive rates were evaluated in 80 symptomatic and asymptomatic controls, including patients with benign urological conditions and nonbladder malignancies, and healthy subjects. CYFRA 21-1 was determined by electrochemoluminescent immunoassay in the Elecsys 2010, urinary bladder cancer antigen was quantified by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (IDL Biotech), tissue polypeptide antigen was measured by the Prolifigen TPA-IRMA and NMP22 was assayed by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (Matritech). Cutoffs were obtained by the 95% percentile in patients with no evidence of disease, which gave a 95% specificity for all biomarkers. Differences in sensitivity of urinary biomarkers regarding stage, grade, tumor size, pattern of growth, focality and recurrence were evaluated.

RESULTS

At a specificity of 95% cutoffs were 5.4 ng./ml. for CYFRA 21-1, 15.5 microg./l. for urinary bladder cancer antigen, 760.8 U./l. for tissue polypeptide antigen and 14.6 U./ml. for NMP22. Using these cutoffs sensitivities were 75.7% for NMP22, 83.8% for CYFRA 21-1, 73.9% for urinary bladder cancer antigen quantitative and 80.2% for tissue polypeptide antigen. The additional determination of cytokeratins increased the sensitivity of NMP22. Cytokeratins did not appear to be specific for bladder cancer, and false-positives rates were between 20% for urinary bladder cancer antigen and 36% for tissue polypeptide antigen for benign urological conditions, and between 40% and 52%, respectively, for nonbladder malignancies. NMP22 showed lower false-positives rates, mainly for benign diseases. Urinary tumor markers appeared to be associated with some of the most relevant histological and clinical parameters of bladder cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary evaluation showed the tests to be potential noninvasive adjuncts to help determine the need for cystoscopy. The combination of 2 tumor markers, NMP22 and 1 cytokeratin (CYFRA 21-1 or urinary bladder cancer antigen), seemed to be the most effective. Further comparative studies are needed to assess the promising diagnostic role of these markers.

Update on urine-based markers for bladder cancer. How sensitive and specific are the new noninvasive tests?

Urine cytology is still the most commonly used noninvasive test to diagnose bladder cancer. However, cytology's ability to detect low-grade bladder tumors is limited, and its results require interpretation by a pathologist, are not available immediately, and are subjective. Several noninvasive urine-based tests are now available for detection and follow-up of bladder cancer. At least two of these new tests (BTA stat and AuraTek FDP) can easily be performed in the office, and the results are available in about 10 minutes. When choosing a test, physicians should keep in mind that none of the currently available tests is 100% accurate. However, the new urine-based tests are more sensitive than urine cytology and hence more reliable in detecting low-grade bladder cancer. They are useful tools in patients with urinary symptoms or microscopic hematuria or as office-based adjuncts to diagnostic procedures. Some of the markers that are being developed could significantly improve and simplify workup, diagnosis, and follow-up, and they may allow for detection of disease at an earlier stage, thus improving the chances of curative therapy.

Evaluation of nuclear matrix protein 22 as a tumour marker in the detection of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of urinary nuclear matrix protein-22 (NMP22) in detecting bladder cancer, to compare the diagnostic performance of NMP22 alone and when corrected by urinary creatinine level, and to correlate NMP22 level with the histological and clinical characteristics of bladder cancer.

PATIENTS, SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The study included 267 patients classified into five groups: group 1 comprised 111 patients with active transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder; group 2 included 76 patients who had had bladder TCC but were being followed and were free of disease, as confirmed by cystoscopy; group 3 comprised 25 patients with benign urological diseases; group 4 included 25 patients with other malignant pathological conditions; group 5 constituted a control group of 30 healthy subjects free of urological diseases. Urinary NMP22 was measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to obtain the thresholds which gave optimal sensitivity and specificity for combinations of NMP22 alone and when corrected by urinary creatinine level. Stage, grade, tumour size, pattern of growth, focality and the presence of recurrence were recorded and their associations with NMP22 evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean levels of NMP22 were 122.8, 5.1, 3.7, 2.3 and 0.3 U/mL for groups 1-5, respectively; overall, these values were significantly different (P<0.001). The mean (95% CI) optimal combination of 78.2% (69.3-85.5) sensitivity and 95.5% (87.3-99.0) specificity was obtained from the ROC analysis with a threshold value of 13.7 U/mL NMP22. When values were corrected by urinary creatinine levels, the threshold given by the best combination of sensitivity and specificity, at 73.2% (63.2-81.7) and 97.0% (89.6-99.5), respectively, was 3.0 U/mg creatinine. NMP22 level was statistically associated with stage, grade, tumour size and focality.

CONCLUSIONS

Urinary NMP22 appeared to be a potential tumour marker for detecting TCC of the bladder; when corrected by urinary creatinine level, it might provide a better interpretation than when used alone. NMP22 correlated with the most relevant variables in bladder cancer. As a noninvasive adjunct, NMP22 might have a role in guiding urologists about the need for cystoscopy in such patients.

Comparison of the nuclear matrix protein 22 with voided urine cytology and BTA stat test in the diagnosis of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder

OBJECTIVE

To assess sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) test, BTA stat test and cytology in the urine of patients with a spectrum of urologic conditions, including bladder cancer.

METHODS

A total of 140 patients (40 with bladder cancer) provided a urine sample which was divided into appropriate aliquots for each of the tests cited above. The endoscopist, pathologist, cytologist and the person performing BTA stat test and NMP22 test were blinded as to the results of the other tests.

RESULTS

Receiver-operating characteristics curve interpretation determined that 12.0 U/ml was an optimal reference value for NMP22 to detect transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder in this patient group. Comparative results demonstrate a clear superiority of NMP22 and BTA stat tests in sensitivity in bladder cancer detection (p < 0.01), while cytology and NMP22 were better than BTA stat test in specificity (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

NMP22 and BTA stat test results represented significant improvement over urinary cytology for detection of transitional cell carcinoma. The sensitivities of NMP22 and BTA stat tests for detection of transitional cell carcinoma in this group of patients were as much as twice that of cytology. When the cutoff value of urinary NMP22 was set at 12.0 U/ml, NMP22 was more accurate than the other tests (p < 0.05).

NMP22: a sensitive, cost-effective test in patients at risk for bladder cancer

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to determine the clinical utility of NMP22 as a urinary marker for the early detection of transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder in patients with hematuria or other indications for risk of malignancy. Its utility will be measured by sensitivity and specificity estimates as compared to cystoscopy. Since urine cytology is normally collected in this population of patients, it will also be analyzed and compared to cystoscopy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Each patient submitted a single voided urine which was stabilized with the NMP22 urine collection kit or preserved in the appropriate cytology medium for cytopathologic testing. All patients provided the urine samples before cystoscopic exam. Of the 146 patients, there were 43 patients with microscopic hematuria and 13 with gross hematuria. Other indications for cystoscopy included unexplained or medically refractory voiding. There were 8 patients with biopsy confirmed bladder cancer and 138 patients with benign conditions of the bladder.

RESULTS

The median NMP22 value for the bladder cancer malignancies was 27.8 U/mL (95% Confidence interval: 10.5-32.1 U/mL). The median NMP22 value for the benign conditions of the bladder was 3.25 U/mL (95% Confidence interval: 2.5-3.8 U/mL). The urinary NMP22 values from the bladder cancer group was statistically different (p < .000001 Mann-Whitney U test) than the NMP22 values in the benign conditions group. Using a reference value of 10.0 U/mL, the sensitivity of NMP22 was 100% with a specificity of 90%, while cytology had a sensitivity of 25% and a specificity of 100%. Due to its high negative predictive value, using NMP22 alone could have eliminated 124 cystoscopies with total savings ranging from $24,824 to $63,264 depending on the type of insurance carrier.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that urinary NMP22 is a useful, cost-effective marker for the early detection of bladder cancer.

Exclusion criteria enhance the specificity and positive predictive value of NMP22 and BTA stat

PURPOSE

The limitation of current urinary tumor markers is the low specificity and positive predictive value, which clinically manifests as a high false-positive rate. We analyzed the false-positive data of 2 urinary tumor markers, NMP22 and the BTA stat tests. We examined the clinical categories of the false-positive results, established relative exclusion criteria, and recalculated the specificity and positive predictive value after using the exclusion criteria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 278 symptomatic patients who presented to a urology clinic were asked to submit a single voided urine sample. Each sample was divided into 3 aliquots of which 1 was stabilized with the NMP22 test kit stabilizer and assayed for NMP22, 1 was tested for BTA stat and 1 was sent for cytological examination. All patients subsequently underwent office cystoscopy and bladder biopsy if indicated.

RESULTS

Of the 278 symptomatic patients 112 presented with microscopic hematuria, 77 gross hematuria and 89 chronic symptoms of urinary frequency or dysuria. Of 34 cases (12%) of histologically confirmed bladder cancer NMP22 detected 28 (82.4%), BTA stat 23 (67.7%) and cytology only 10 (29.4%). When atypical cytologies were considered positive, cytology then detected 19 cases (55.9%). Elevated NMP22 values were positive in 28 cases and false-positive in 44 for a specificity of 82% and a positive predictive value of 38.9%. Similarly, BTA stat test was positive in 23 cases and false-positive in 43 for a specificity of 82.4% and a positive predictive value of 34.9%. When atypical cytologies were considered positive, the specificity and positive predictive value were 93% and 55.9%. Greater than 80% of the false-positive results were clinically categorized as benign inflammatory or infectious conditions, renal or bladder calculi, recent history of a foreign body in the urinary tract, bowel interposition segment, another genitourinary cancer or an instrumented urinary sample. A category of "no known pathology" was included in analysis as a control. History of ureteral stents or any bowel interposition segment had a 100% false-positive rate. Exclusion of all 6 clinical categories improved the specificity and positive predictive value of NMP22 (95.6%, 87.5%) and BTA stat (91.5%, 69.7%), and was similar to urinary cytology.

CONCLUSIONS

Awareness and exclusion of the categories of false-positive results can increase the specificity and enhance the clinical usefulness of NMP22 and BTA stat tests. Similarly, treating an atypical cytology as positive can enhance the sensitivity and usefulness of urinary cytology.

[Urinary NMP22 as a new marker in patients with transitional cell carcinoma]

To evaluate urinary NMP22 dosage as a marker of urothelial tumours, we have selected a group of 90 patients (85 males and 5 females, mean age 66 years) with clinical suspicion of transitional cell carcinoma (TCC), with microscopic or macroscopic hematuria, flank pain, urographic abnormalities and dysuria. All the patients have been evaluated by urinary cytology, renal and bladder ultrasound, cystoscopy. When a bladder tumour has been detected, bladder biopsies and, when required, I.V.P., CT or retrograde pyelography have been performed. A urine sample has been collected between midnight and noon; all samples from patients who were undergoing invasive procedures such as cystoscopy, were collected before or at least 5 days after the procedure. The test has been performed according to ELISA NMP22 (Matritech) technique; the test is specific for the nuclear matrix protein/nuclear mitotic apparatus protein expressed by cancer cells. When performing the test, 30 patients presented macroscopic hematuria. 22 patients resulted to have benign urinary tract conditions, 65 patients had TCC and 3 patients had a final evaluation suspicious for TCC. The NMP22 values were respectively 7.1 +/- 4.7 U/ml, 21.9 +/- 21.0 U/ml and 16 +/- 8.0 U/ml. From our study the sensitivity of the test is 67% (with a threshold value of 10 U/ml) and 55% (with a threshold value of 20 U/ml), while the urinary cytology resulted to have a sensitivity of 26% (p < 0.05). The sensitivity of the test in relation to staging was as follow: Tis 66% with a mean NMP22 value of 23.3 U/ml, Ta 26% with a mean NMP22 value of 13.2 U/ml, T1 100% with a mean NMP22 value of 40 U/ml, T2 73% with a mean NMP22 value of 36.4 U/ml. The specificity of the test was 100% with a threshold value of 20 U/ml. When considering a threshold value of 10 U/ml, the NMP22 test has a sensitivity higher than cytology, especially in low stage TCC. Macroscopic hematuria does not affect its sensitivity; the diagnostic efficacy of the test is not increased by the association of urinary cytology. It has an important role in the diagnosis of residual disease after TURB and in the follow-up evaluation of bladder cancer patients, since its dosage is not influenced by inflammatory conditions of the mucosa. We believe therefore that NMP22 is useful in clinical practice.

Urinary nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22): a diagnostic adjunct to urine cytologic examination for the detection of recurrent transitional-cell carcinoma of the bladder

This study compares urine nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) immunoassay and conventional urine cytologic examination for detecting recurrent transitional-cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urinary bladder. One hundred twenty-eight urine specimens from 107 patients with a history of TCC of the urinary bladder were studied. NMP22 immunoassay and conventional cytologic examination were performed on each specimen. The NMP22 and cytology results were then compared with the results of subsequent cystoscopies/surgical biopsies performed over a 6-mo follow-up period. The sensitivity of urine cytologic study for predicting recurrent TCC was 60%, while the sensitivity of NMP22 assay was 47%. When both NMP22 assay results and the cytologic interpretation were positive for TCC, the positive predictive value of the combined tests was 74%. When both tests showed negative results, the negative predictive power was 81%. Our findings suggest that urine NMP22 assay may represent a useful diagnostic adjunct to conventional urine cytologic examination for the detection of recurrent TCC of the urinary bladder.

Urinary nuclear matrix protein 22 as a new marker for the screening of urothelial cancer in patients with microscopic hematuria

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to determine the clinical usefulness of nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) as a new urinary marker for the screening of urothelial cancer in patients with microscopic hematuria, especially in comparison with that of voided urine cytology.

METHODS

Patients with microscopic hematuria detected at a health examination, who were advised by a consulted urologist to have a cystoscopical examination, were asked to enter this study. Urine samples were collected before cystoscopy and divided into two portions for NMP22 test and voided urine cytology.

RESULTS

Of the 309 patients with microscopic hematuria, 22 cases (7.1%) of urothelial cancer and one case of prostate cancer were detected. For the other cases, 128 (41.4%) were of benign diseases and 158 (51.1%) were designated as having no evidence of disease (NED). The median NMP22 values for urothelial cancer, other diseases and NED were 35.5, 6.7 and 6.0 U/mL, respectively, with 95% confidence intervals of 19.9-228.2, 5.1-9.3 and 5.4-7.2, respectively. The sensitivity of the NMP22 test for urothelial cancer was 90.9% (20/22), whereas the sensitivity of voided urine cytology was only 54.5% (12/22).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study indicates that urinary NMP22 is a useful tool for the screening of urothelial cancer in patients with microscopic hematuria.

Evaluation of urinary level of NMP22 as a diagnostic marker for stage pTa-pT1 bladder cancer: comparison with urinary cytology and BTA test

BACKGROUND

In the present study we compared the clinical value of two new specific tests for transitional cell carcinoma, urinary nuclear matrix protein (NMP22) levels and bladder tumor antigen (BTA) test, with that of urinary cytology in the follow-up of patients with superficial bladder cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Hundred and five bladder cancer patients were recruited: 30 stage pTa and 45 stage pT1 (group A), and 30 with a history of bladder cancer but no recurrence at the time of the study (group B). Urine samples were collected before any instrumental manipulation of the genitourinary tract. All patients were negative for urinary tract infections at conventional urine analysis.

RESULTS

NMP22 at a cutoff value of 6 U/ml showed a sensitivity of 83.3% in pTa cases and 97.7% in pT1 cases, with a false-positive rate of 23.3%. The BTA test was positive in 26.6% of patients with cancer stage pTa and in 66.6% of pT1 stage, with 30% false-positives in the non-neoplastic group. Urinary cytology, performed on three consecutive samples, was positive in 20% of patients with cancer stage pTa and in 64.4% of pT1 stage and did not show any false-positive cases. Stratifying the neoplastic patients according to lesion grade, NMP22 (at a cutoff value of 6 U/ml) was positive in 86.2% of G1, 97.2% of G2 and 90% of G3. BTA was positive in 37.9, 52.7 and 70% of G1, G2 and G3, respectively, while urinary cytology was positive in 37.9, 44.4 and 80%.

Urinary dosage of nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) like biologic marker of transitional cell carcinoma (TCC): a study on patients with hematuria

This study was performed to evaluate the clinical usefulness of nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) as urinary marker for bladder cancer and to define its role in comparison with urinary cytology in diagnostic management of patients with hematuria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

NMP22 values in voided urines were determined on 90 patients (81 males, 14 females) with macro or microscopical hematuria, using the NMP22 test-kit (Matritech) based on an enzyme-linked immuno-sorbant assay. The cut-off value for positive samples was 10U/ml. In all cases urinary cytology was performed on the same sample. Patients suspected for the presence of a transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) underwent cytoscopic control. Statistical signification of the medians difference was analyzed using both medians variance analysis and Student's test. The increasing in diagnostic predictivity was analyzed elaborating contingency tables and performing consequently chi 2 test.

RESULTS

32 cases of TCC were endoscopically detected: sensitivity of cytopathology was 75.8%, specificity was 62.5%. The positive predictive value of the cytology was 22% and negative predictive value was 49%. The results concerning NMP22 dosage are: sensitivity 84%, specificity 62%. Positive predictive value of NMP22 test was 30% and predictive negative value was 40%. No significant differences between cytopathology and NMP22 dosage were founded (p > 0.995). Considering both cytopathology and NMP22 dosage, sensitivity was 82.7% and specificity raises up to 90.6% with statistical signification (P < 0.001). The median NMP22 value in patients affected by TCC endoscopically confirmed (group A) was 55.2 U/ml, in subjects with no evidence of malignancy (group B) it was 19.1 U/ml. The difference shows statistical signification (p < 0.001). In 20 cases with TCC, hystological grading were available and were investigated in relationship with NMP22 title in U/ml, median NMP22 value for each grade was: CIS = 102 U/ml, G0 = 35 U/ml, G1 = 30 U/ml, G2 = 66 U/ml, G3 = 54 U/ml. It can be assessed that NMP22 test is useful in differentiating subjects affected by TCC from subjects with no evidence of malignancy and may help in early diagnosis of TCC and in predicting recurrent even if low grade tumors especially if used in association with cytology and endoscopy.

NMP22 is a sensitive, cost-effective test in patients at risk for bladder cancer

PURPOSE

The early diagnosis of bladder cancer is central to its effective treatment. This study was designed to determine the clinical use of NMP22 as a urinary marker for the early detection of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder in patients with hematuria or other indications at risk for malignancy. The sensitivity and specificity of the NMP22 test were compared with urinary cytology, and the results of both tests were then compared to cystoscopic findings. We also determined if NMP22 provided a cost advantage over our current modalities in our patient population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Each patient submitted a single voided urine which was divided in 2 parts, of which 1 was stabilized with the NMP22 urine collection kit and 1 was preserved in the appropriate cytology medium for cytopathological testing. All patients provided the urine samples before cystoscopic examination. Of the 330 patients 114 (34.5%) presented with microscopic hematuria and 66 (20.4%) with gross hematuria. Other indications for cystoscopy included atypical cytology or unexplained voiding symptoms refractory to medical therapy.

RESULTS

There were 18 patients with biopsy confirmed bladder cancer and 312 with benign conditions of the bladder. Median NMP22 value for the malignant bladder tumors was 31.6 units per ml. (95% confidence interval 13.4 to 90.9) and 4.3 units per ml. (3.8 to 4.8) for benign conditions of the bladder. The urinary NMP22 values in the bladder cancer group were significantly higher than those in the benign condition group (p <0.001). The sensitivity of NMP22 was 100% with a specificity of 85% at a reference value of 10.0 units per ml., while cytology had a sensitivity of only 33% and specificity of 100%. Given a negative predictive value of 100% for NMP22, a cost savings of $28,302 to $111,072 (depending on the type of insurance carrier) would have been achieved if it was used alone as the indication for cystoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that urinary NMP22 is a simple, noninvasive, cost-effective marker for the detection of bladder cancer.

Urinary NMP22 for the detection of recurrence after transurethral resection of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: experience on 137 patients

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) test in the management of patients after transurethral resection (TUR) of recurrent transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.

METHODS

The NMP22 test was performed in 137 patients: in 42 patients, a bladder recurrence was detected by cystoscopy and histologically confirmed; 95 patients were recurrence-free at cytology and cystoscopy performed at least 3 months after TUR.

RESULTS

In patients with tumoral recurrence, the mean NMP22 value was 54.8 U/mL. The false-negative rate was 28.5%. In recurrence-free patients, the mean NMP22 value was 22.8 U/mL. The specificity of the NMP22 test was 61%. Higher NMP22 mean values (29.6 versus 15.8 U/mL) were found in patients who underwent intravesical chemotherapy or immunotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite its good sensitivity, the NMP22 test cannot be adopted as a routine tool in the surveillance after TUR of patients with superficial bladder cancer because of its low specificity.

Comparison of nuclear matrix protein 22 and bladder tumor antigen in urine of patients with bladder cancer

Recently, two new tumor markers for bladder cancer have been introduced: NMP22 test and BTA TRAK assay. This study was designed to evaluate the urinary values of these two proteins using quantitative enzyme immunoassays in well microplates. Urine samples from 47 healthy subjects, 26 with benign genitourinary disorders and 109 patients with a histological diagnosis of bladder cancer were collected. The specificity, the positive predictive value, the negative predictive value and the efficiency were established for NMP 22 and BTA, and the cut off values were fixed at a specificity of 95% in the benign disease group (12 U/ml and 23 U/ml respectively). We observed a very high concordance between the two urinary tumor markers (73%), although the overall sensitivity of BTA in bladder cancer patients seems to be better than that of NMP22 (62% vs 54% respectively), especially in the superficial disease group (36% for BTA and 14% for NMP22).

Sensitivity and specificity of NMP-22, telomerase, and BTA in the detection of human bladder cancer

OBJECTIVES

The recent introduction of novel molecular markers into clinical urology has created a need to evaluate the efficacy and utility of these potential markers. The ideal assay for bladder cancer should be noninvasive, sensitive, specific, and cost-effective. We compared the Matritech nuclear maxtrix protein (NMP)-22 assay, telomerase activity, and the Bard bladder tumor antigen (BTA) assay for the detection of human bladder cancer.

METHODS

A single voided urine sample was obtained from patients with hematuria without bladder cancer and from patients with known bladder cancer before any treatment. Approximately 50 to 100 mL of voided urine sample was collected and aliquotted for the various assays. The results were compared to single cytologic results and ultimately to pathologic findings.

RESULTS

In 47 patients with bladder cancer, the overall sensitivity was 81% for NMP-22, 80% for telomerase, 40% for BTA, and 40% for cytology. For Ta tumors (n = 31), sensitivity was 81% for NMP-22, 70% for telomerase, 32% for BTA, and 26% for cytology. For T1 or higher stage tumors (n = 13), sensitivity was 82% for NMP-22, 91% for telomerase, 64% for BTA, and 64% for cytology. The remaining 3 patients had carcinoma in situ (CIS). When tumors were stratified by tumor grade, grade I tumors (n = 16) were detected at 69% with NMP-22, 65% with telomerase, 13% with BTA, and 6% with cytology. Grade II tumors (n = 14) were detected at 86% with NMP-22, 72% with telomerase, 36% with BTA, and 36% with cytology. Grade III tumors (n = 14) were detected at 93% with NMP-22, 93% with telomerase, 79% with BTA, and 79% with cytology. Patients with CIS (n = 3) were detected at 67% with NMP-22, 100% with telomerase, 33% with BTA, and 67% with cytology. In 30 patients with hematuria but without bladder cancer, the overall specificity of the assays was 77% for NMP-22, 80% for telomerase, 73% for BTA, and 94% for cytology.

CONCLUSIONS

In the population tested, NMP-22 and the telomerase assays gave similar sensitivity and specificity for the detection of bladder cancer, and appear to offer a greater sensitivity than the BTA assay and/or conventional cytology.

Can urine bound diagnostic tests replace cystoscopy in the management of bladder cancer?

PURPOSE

We compare the diagnostic value of NMP22 and BTA stat testing, and QUANTICYT computer assisted dual parameter image analysis to cytology and cystoscopy in patients who had symptoms suggestive of transitional cell cancer or were being followed after treatment for that disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively evaluated voided urine and/or barbotage specimens from 291 patients a mean of 65.2 years old. All voided urine samples were evaluated by quick staining and standard cytology, the BTA stat 1-step qualitative assay (which detects a bladder tumor associated antigen) and the NMP22 test (which detects a nuclear mitotic apparatus protein). In addition, barbotage specimens were evaluated by QUANTICYT computer assisted dual parameter image analysis. All patients underwent subsequent cystoscopy and biopsy evaluation of any suspicious lesion. Sensitivity, specificity, and the predictive value of positive and negative results were determined in correlation with endoscopic and histological findings.

RESULTS

In 91 patients with histologically proved transitional cell carcinoma overall sensitivity was 48, 57, 58, 59 and 59% for the NMP22 test, the BTA stat test, rapid staining cytology of barbotage samples, rapid staining cytology of voided urine specimens and image analysis, respectively. For histological grades 1 to 3 underlying transitional cell carcinoma sensitivity was 17, 61 and 90% for urinary cytology, 48, 58 and 63% for the BTA stat test, and 52, 45 and 50% for the NMP22 test, respectively. Specificity was 100% for cytology, 93% for image analysis, 70% for the NMP22 test and 68% for the BTA stat test.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunological markers are superior to cytological evaluation and image analysis for detecting low grade transitional cell carcinoma but they have low specificity and sensitivity in grade 3 transitional cell carcinoma. Urine bound diagnostic tools cannot replace cystoscopy.

Evaluation of NMP22 in the detection of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder

PURPOSE

Urinary nuclear matrix protein (NMP22) was evaluated for detection of new and recurrent bladder tumors in patients with a history of transitional cell carcinoma. Our objective was to determine sensitivity and specificity of this marker for tumors of various stages and grades, as well as its use as an adjunct to or substitute for urinary cytology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 231 patients with a history of transitional cell carcinoma provided 288 voided urine samples before cystoscopic examination at 1 of 3 institutions (53 patients were reevaluated at least once). Urine samples were assayed for NMP22 using the NMP22 Test Kit. Select patients underwent biopsy with appropriate additional therapy. Voided urinary cytology was obtained in 200 cases. End points for determination of the absence and presence of tumor were negative cystoscopy and positive biopsy, respectively. A receiver operating characteristics curve was constructed to determine the optimal NMP22 threshold for detection of transitional cell carcinoma. For positive biopsies NMP22 values were also correlated with tumor stage and grade. Comparison to cytology was limited to patients with complete data.

RESULTS

There were 208 negative cystoscopies (158 with cytology) and 66 positive cystoscopies with biopsy (42 with cytology). Of the cases 14 were eliminated from statistical analysis due to incomplete data. Receiver operating characteristics curve interpretation determined that 6.4 units per ml. was an optimal reference value for detection of transitional cell carcinoma in this patient group. Sensitivity and specificity for all pathological groupings was 68 and 80%, respectively. When compared to cytology the sensitivities of NMP22 and cytology were 67 versus 31 or 40% (depending on the definition of positive cytology).

CONCLUSIONS

NMP22 values represented significant improvement over urinary cytology for detection of transitional cell carcinoma. The sensitivity of NMP22 for detection of transitional cell carcinoma in bladder cancer patients was as much as twice that of cytology when a reference value of 6.4 units per ml. was used. NMP22 analysis was less costly than cytology and operator independent. While NMP22 has previously been shown to be a strong predictor of recurrence after tumor resection, it is an effective and sensitive screening test for detecting tumors in patients with transitional cell carcinoma.

New methods for detection of bladder cancer

Superficial bladder cancer is characterized by a high incidence of recurrence and a low risk of progression. Cystoscopy has been the mainstay for bladder cancer detection with additional information provided by urine cytology. Several new markers, including the BTA series of markers, NMP22 and FDP, have been approved for clinical use; numerous others continue to be evaluated. Markers help to detect clinically occult bladder cancer and to increase the interval of cystoscopic evaluation. The former indication emphasizes specificity (if a marker has high specificity, the marker-directed biopsies are frequently positive) and the latter, sensitivity (if a marker has high sensitivity, there is a low risk of deferring cystoscopy when bladder cancer is present). Because no marker or combination of markers has 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity, the selection of markers for clinical use rests on the desired objective and the performance characteristics of the available assays.

Comparison of urine collection methods for evaluating urinary nuclear matrix protein, NMP22, as a tumor marker

PURPOSE

The nuclear matrix protein, NMP22, has been shown to be a useful tumor marker for identifying patients with a high likelihood of rapid recurrence of transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary tract after surgical treatment. Currently measurement of NMP22 involves 3 urine voids collected during a 24-hour period, which are pooled and assayed as a single sample. This study was performed to determine whether any single void would yield similar results to the pooled 3-void sample.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 2,018 urine samples (3 voids per sample) was included in the study. All analyses were performed using the nonparametric Wilcoxon signed rank test for matched pairs.

RESULTS

Analysis showed that the NMP22 level of a single void collected between midnight and noon was similar to the NMP22 level of the pooled 3-void sample. Receiver operating characteristics curves of the midnight-to-noon single void and the pooled 3-void sample were similar for predicting recurrence postoperatively in patients with urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

One void collected between midnight and noon compares favorably with the current 3-void collection method for determining NMP22 levels in urine.

[Evaluation of urinary NMP22 (nuclear matrix protein 22) as a diagnostic marker for urothelial cancer--NMP22 as a urinary marker for surveillance of bladder cancer. NMP22 Study Group]

This study was undertaken to determine the clinical usefulness of NMP22 (Nuclear Matrix Protein 22) as a urinary marker for the surveillance of bladder cancer, especially in comparison with that of voided urine cytology. Urinary NMP22 values were determined for 144 patients with histologically diagnosed bladder cancer, 65 patients with other urological cancers, and 171 healthy volunteers by use of a UNMP22 Test kit, which is based on an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. All bladder cancer patients were evaluated for urinary NMP22 values and voided urine cytology simultaneously from the same urine samples. Based on the data from the bladder cancer patients and the healthy volunteers, the cut-off value was set at 12 U/ml. The median urinary NMP22 value for the bladder cancer patients was 17.8 U/ml (95% CI: 13.1-29.0). The sensitivities of urinary NMP22 and voided urine cytology were 61.1% (88/144) and 33.8% (48/144), respectively, a significant difference (p < 0.00001). Multivariate analysis revealed that tumor size affected the urinary NMP22 values. The positive rate by tumor size was 42.3%, 59.1%, and 85.0% for tumors of < 10 mm, 10-30 mm, and > 30 mm, respectively. Urinary NMP22 values decreased postoperatively in 82.9% of the patients. The median NMP22 values for prostate cancer and renal cancer were 4.4 U/ml (95% CI: 2.2-6.7) and 6.2 U/ml (95% CI: 3.6-12.5). The positive rates were 24.2% and 31.3%, respectively, both of which were significantly lower than for bladder cancer. Our multicenter study indicates that urinary NMP22 test is more sensitive than voided urine cytology test for the surveillance of bladder cancer.

[Evaluation of urinary NMP22 (nuclear matrix protein 22) as a diagnostic marker for urothelial cancer--screening for urothelial cancer in patients with microscopic hematuria. NMP Study Group]

This study was undertaken to determine the clinical usefulness of NMP22 (Nuclear Matrix Protein 22) as a urinary marker for the screening of urothelial cancer in patients with microscopic hematuria, especially in comparison with that of voided urine cytology. Urinary NMP22 values were determined for 183 patients with microscopic hematuria by use of a UNMP22 Test kit, which is based on an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. All patients were entered in this study before cystoscopy was performed, and were evaluated for NMP22 values and voided urine cytology simultaneously from the same urine samples. Of the 183 patients with microscopic hematuria, 14 cases of urothelial cancer were detected. For the other cases, 65 were of benign diseases and 104 were designated NED (No Evidence of Disease). The median NMP22 values for urothelial cancer, benign diseases, and NED were 26.5 U/ml (95% CI: 18.5-228.2; 4.9 U/ml (95% CI: 3.6-8.3), and 5.9 U/ml (95% CI: 4.8-6.5), respectively. The urinary NMP22 value for urothelial cancer was significantly higher than for benign diseases and NED. When the cut-off value of urinary NMP22 was set at 12 U/ml, the positive rate of NMP22 for urothelial cancer was 85.7%, significantly higher than the 50% positive rate by voided urine cytology. This study indicates that urinary NMP22 is a useful tool for the screening of urothelial cancer in patients with microscopic hematuria.

The role of nuclear matrix protein 22 in the detection of persistent or recurrent transitional-cell cancer of the bladder

Successful management of transitional-cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder is greatly dependent upon regular surveillance and early detection of persistent or recurrent carcinoma. The development of a highly sensitive urinary test for the detection of transitional-cell carcinoma of the bladder could have a dramatic impact on our ability to diagnose and monitor bladder cancer patients as well as influence the treatment outcome. The urinary level of the nuclear matrix protein, NMP22, has been found to be elevated in patients with urothelial malignancy. This has prompted the development of an immunoassay to quantitate urinary NMP22 and use it as a cancer-specific marker. We provide a summary of the studies completed with the immunoassay for urinary NMP22 as an indicator for the presence of transitional-cell carcinoma and compare the results with those obtained using other screening modalities.

Clinical evaluation of nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) in urine as a novel marker for urothelial cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study was undertaken to determine the clinical usefulness of nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) as a novel urine marker for urothelial cancer, particularly, to substitute for voided-urine cytology.

METHODS

NMP22 values were determined for 280 patients and 20 healthy volunteers by NMP22 Test Kit based on an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

When the cut-off value was set at 10 U/ml, the positive rate of urinary NMP22 for urothelial cancer was 80.9% (38/47), whereas that for posttreatment cases and benign diseases was 35.7% (74/207). When urinary NMP22 and voided-urine cytology were compared, the test for urinary NMP22 showed higher sensitivity than cytology in patients with urothelial cancer. When urinary NMP22 values were determined pre- and postoperatively in patients with urothelial cancer, the postoperative value decreased in all patients, and were below the cut-off value in all except one patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Urinary NMP22 is a useful diagnostic marker as a substitute for voided-urine cytology for the surveillance of urothelial cancer.