Prepaid group practice effects on the utilization of medical services and health outcomes for children: results from a controlled trial

A total of 693 children between the ages of 0 and 13 years were randomly assigned to either a staff model HMO or to one of several fee-for-service insurance plans in Seattle to evaluate differences in medical expenditures and health outcomes. Although the fee-for-service plans varied the amount of cost sharing (0% to 95%), all children were covered for the same medical services, for either 3 or 5 years. No differences in imputed total expenditures were observed for children assigned to the HMO or any of the fee-for-service plans. Children with cost-sharing fee-for-service plans, however, had fewer medical contacts and received fewer preventive services than those assigned to the HMO. Nonetheless, children with the cost-sharing fee-for-service plans were perceived (by their mothers) to be in better health overall than those assigned to the HMO. No significant differences regarding physiological outcomes (eg, visual acuity, hemoglobin level) were observed between the two groups. The results of this experiment neither strongly support nor indict fee-for-service or prepaid care for children.

How cost sharing affects the use of ambulatory mental health services

The less generous insurance coverage for mental health care has generated some controversy. The major unresolved question is how the demand for outpatient mental health care responds to cost sharing. We used data from a randomized trial of fee-for-service health insurance for the nonelderly to address this question. The study enrolled 5809 persons. The results are based on 19 819 person-years of data. One hundred thirty-three percent more is spent on outpatient psychotherapy when care is free to patients than when they pay 95% of the fee, subject to an annual catastrophic limit. But, the absolute level of expenditure is low on all plans; $32 per person per year with free care. The response to psychotherapy services to cost sharing is insignificantly larger than that for outpatient general medical services. We found no evidence that more generous coverage for outpatient psychotherapy decreases total health expenditures.

Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study

Physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) measures make it possible to reduce the number of statistical comparisons and thereby the role of chance in testing hypotheses about health outcomes. To test their usefulness relative to a profile of eight scores, results were compared across 16 tests involving patients (N = 1,440) participating in the Medical Outcomes Study. Comparisons were made between groups known to differ at a point in time or to change over time in terms of age, diagnosis, severity of disease, comorbid conditions, acute symptoms, self-reported changes in health, and recovery from clinical depression. The relative validity (RV) of each measure was estimated by a comparison of statistical results with those for the best scales in the same tests. Differences in RV among scales from the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) were consistent with those in previous studies. One or both of the summary measures were significant for 14 of 15 differences detected in multivariate analyses of profiles and detected differences missed by the profile in one test. Relative validity coefficients ranged from .20 to .94 (median, .79) for PCS in tests involving physical criteria and from .93 to 1.45 (median, 1.02) for MCS in tests involving mental criteria. The MCS was superior to the best SF-36 scale in three of four tests involving mental health. Results suggest that the two summary measures may be useful in most studies and that their empiric validity, relative to the best SF-36 scale, will depend on the application. Surveys offering the option of analyzing both a profile and psychometrically based summary measures have an advantage over those that do not.

Comparison of responses to SF-36 Health Survey questions with one-week and four-week recall periods

OBJECTIVE

To compare the measurement properties of acute (one-week recall) and standard (four-week recall) versions of SF-36 Health Survey (SF-36) scale scores.

DATA SOURCES

SF-36 data collected from 142 participants (60% female, average age 39) in a clinical trial of an asthma medication: 74 patients randomized to the acute form and 68 to the standard.

DATA COLLECTION

The SF-36 was self-administered at the time of a clinic visit (before clinical examination) to synchronize with clinical measures of disease severity at three different time points during the clinical trial: -2 weeks (two weeks before randomization to treatment), baseline (week 0 or randomization), and +4 weeks (four weeks after baseline).

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

The acute form yielded high-quality data; scales conformed to the assumptions of the summated ratings method used to score the standard SF-36; and scales had good distributional properties, were reliable, and had a factor content similar to the standard. The data indicated that while the acute form was more sensitive than the standard to change in health status associated with changes in acute symptoms, acute scale scores may not be comparable to national norms based on the standard, particularly for those scales that assess frequency of health events during a specified time period.

CONCLUSIONS

Results support the use of the acute form in its intended applications; however, further research is required to document the generalizability of greater sensitivity of the acute form to recent changes in health and to explore whether norms based on the standard can be used to interpret the acute scale scores.

Patients' ratings of outpatient visits in different practice settings. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study

OBJECTIVE

To determine how patients in different kinds of practices--solo or single specialty (SOLO), multispecialty group (MSG), or health maintenance organizations (HMOs)--and with fee-for-service (FFS) or prepaid physician payment arrangements evaluate their medical care.

DESIGN

Survey of adult outpatients after office visits, with sample weighted to represent population of patients visiting physicians in each practice type.

SETTING

Offices of 367 internists, family practitioners, endocrinologists, cardiologists, and nurse practitioners, in HMOs (prepaid only), MSGs (prepaid and FFS), and SOLO practices (prepaid and FFS).

PATIENTS

Adults (N = 17,671) at start of the Medical Outcomes Study.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Overall rating of the visit (five choices from excellent to poor). A random half of the sample also rated the provider's technical skills, personal manner, and explanations of care as well as time spent during the visit, the appointment wait, the office wait, the convenience of the office location, and telephone access.

RESULTS

Fifty-five percent of patients rated their visit overall as excellent, 32% very good, 11% good, and 2% fair or poor. Patients of SOLO practitioners were more likely (64%) to rate their visit excellent than MSG (48%) or HMO (49%) patients (P < .001). Patients of SOLO practitioners rated all aspects of care better than HMO patients did, most markedly appointment waits (64% vs 40% excellent; P < .0001) and telephone access (64% vs 33% excellent; P < .0001). Within SOLO and MSG practices, FFS patients rated most specific aspects better than prepaid patients, but these differences were not statistically significant and were inconsistent across cities. Adjusting for patients' demographics, diagnoses and self-rated health did not change results. Physicians with visit ratings in the lowest 20% were nearly four times as likely to be left by patients within 6 months than physicians in the highest 20% (16.7% vs 4.6%; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Of the five practice type and payment method combinations, SOLO FFS patients rated their visits best and HMO patients worst. Whether FFS or prepaid, care was rated better in small than in large practices. Our study shows that a brief visit rating form can be used to compare practice settings and health plans, and that patient ratings predict what proportion of patients, on average, will leave their physicians in the next several months.

Detection of depressive disorder for patients receiving prepaid or fee-for-service care. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study

We estimated clinicians' awareness of depression for patients with current depressive disorder (N = 650) who received care in either a single-specialty solo or small group practice, a large multispecialty group practice, or a health maintenance organization in three US sites. Depressive disorder was determined by independent diagnostic assessment shortly after an office visit. Detection and treatment of depression were determined from visit-report forms completed by the treating clinician. Depending on the setting, from 78.2% to 86.9% of depressed patients who visited mental health specialists had their depression detected at the time of the visit, compared with 45.9% to 51.2% of depressed patients who visited medical clinicians, after adjusting for case-mix differences. Among patients of mental health specialists, there were no significant differences by type of payment in the likelihood of depressive disorder being detected or treated. Among patients of medical clinicians, however, those receiving care financed by prepayment were significantly less likely to have their depression detected or treated during the visit than were similar patients receiving fee-for-service care.

Sustained virologic response is associated with improved health-related quality of life in relapsed chronic hepatitis C patients

Although evidence of virologic elimination, normalization of serum alanine aminotransferase levels, and reduction in liver inflammation are the principal therapeutic outcome goals in chronic hepatitis C patients, improvement in health-related quality of life (HQL) is also an important aspect of therapeutic outcome. In a recent report of chronic hepatitis C patients treated for 24 weeks with interferon, sustained virologic response (24 weeks post-treatment) was associated with improvement in HQL compared with nonresponse. We report on the relationship between sustained virologic response and Hepatitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (HQLQ) survey results of patients who relapsed after a previous course of interferon alfa who were subsequently treated with recombinant interferon alfa-2b (rIFN-alpha 2b) either alone or in combination with ribavirin. The HQLQ was administered at baseline, at treatment Weeks 12 and 24, and at follow-up Weeks 12 and 24. All patients received rIFN-alpha 2b 3 million International Units by subcutaneous injection three times weekly plus either oral ribavirin (1,000 or 1,200 mg) or placebo daily for 24 weeks. At baseline, patients scored lower than adjusted population norms in HQL. Relative to patients treated with rIFN-alpha 2b monotherapy, patients receiving combination therapy showed better HQL in 6 of 13 domains. Furthermore, sustained virologic response in either treatment group was associated with improvement in the scores of both generic and hepatitis-specific HQL survey domains. These results indicate that successful therapeutic resolution of hepatitis C infection improves HQL as assessed by generic and hepatitis C-specific measures of functional health and well-being. Furthermore, improvements in HQL outcome measures may predict reduced demand for health care resources and greater productivity in the workplace.

Paradigm for the management of patient outcomes

Health-status measurement is discussed, and a paradigm for the management of patient outcomes is described and applied to a patient case. Challenged not only to eradicate disease but to improve health, today's health-care professionals must examine the structure, process, and outcomes of care to ensure that optimal care is provided. Techniques for measuring outcomes have been developed; important indicators are functional status, general well-being, and the patient's assessment of care. An interdisciplinary team of physicians, social scientists, and public policy experts at The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, studies ways of monitoring and improving the quality and efficiency of care. The team, which now includes a pharmacist, is working to develop practical systems of care whose outcomes can be tested in patients at the medical center. The paradigm developed for the management of patient outcomes begins with evaluation based on results of history, physical examination, and diagnostic tests. Problems and goals (therapeutic endpoints) are then defined, and the safest, most effective, and least costly treatment is selected. Treatment is monitored for subjective and objective results and adjusted as necessary. The achievement of each endpoint contributes to improvement of the patient's health. Knowledge of health-status measurement will enable pharmacists to increase their contribution to patients' health.

Consequences of cost-sharing for children's health

Do children whose families bear a percentage of their health care costs reduce their use of ambulatory care compared with those families who receive free care? If so, does the reduction affect their health? To answer these questions, 1,844 children aged 0 to 13 years were randomly assigned (for a period of 3 or 5 years) to one of 14 insurance plans. The plans differed in the percentage of their medical bills that families paid. One plan provided free care. The others required up to 95% coinsurance subject to a +1,000 maximum. Children whose families paid a percentage of costs reduced use by up to one third. For the typical child in the study, this reduction caused no significant difference in either parental perceptions of their child's health or in physiologic measures of health. Confidence intervals are sufficiently narrow for most measures to rule out the possibility that large true differences went undetected. Nor were statistically significant differences observed for children at risk of disease. Wider confidence intervals for these comparisons, however, mean that clinically meaningful differences, if present, could have been undetected in certain subgroups.

Income group differences in relationships among survey measures of physical and mental health

The present research tested the hypothesis that the experience of health is hierarchically organized such that gratification of physical health needs must precede gratification of mental health needs. It was reasoned that because the nondisadvantaged possess greater resources for the gratification of health needs in general, symptoms of mental illness would be more salient for this group and thus better able to explain variance in both mental and physical illness. On the other hand, it was reasoned that symptoms of physical illness would be more salient and thus better able to explain variance in both mental and physical illness for the disadvantaged. Results of the study indicate income group differences in patterns of relationships among health variables, supporting the hypothesis and suggesting important differences in the validity of health measures across income groups. The results are related to previous findings in medical sociology, and suggestions for future research are made.

Do physicians preach what they practice? A study of physicians' health habits and counseling practices

We examined the relation of physicians' clinical specialty, personal health habits, and health-related beliefs to their practices in counseling about smoking, weight, exercise, and alcohol. We surveyed a random sample of members of a county medical society in selected specialties. Physicians with better personal health habits and more positive attitudes toward counseling counsel a broader range of patients and counsel more aggressively. Surgeons counsel less than nonsurgeons, even after controlling for differences in health-related attitudes and personal habits.