Phase II trial of brachytherapy alone after lumpectomy for select breast cancer: toxicity analysis of RTOG 95-17

PURPOSE

Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) can be delivered with brachytherapy within 4-5 days compared with 5-6 weeks for conventional whole breast external beam radiotherapy. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 95-17 is the first prospective phase I-II cooperative group trial of APBI alone after lumpectomy in select patients with breast cancer. The toxicity rates are reported for low-dose-rate (LDR) and high-dose-rate (HDR) APBI on this trial.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The inclusion criteria for this study included invasive nonlobular tumors < or =3 cm after lumpectomy with negative surgical margins and axillary dissection with zero to three positive axillary nodes without extracapsular extension. The patients were treated with either LDR APBI (45 Gy in 3.5-5 days) or HDR APBI (34 Gy in 10 twice-daily fractions within 5 days). Chemotherapy (> or =2 weeks after APBI) and/or tamoxifen could be given at the discretion of the treating physicians.

RESULTS

Between August 1997 and March 2000, 100 women were enrolled in this study, and 99 were evaluated. Of the 99 women, 33 were treated with LDR and 66 with HDR APBI. The median follow-up for all patients was 2.7 years (range, 0.6-4.4 years) and was 2.9 years for LDR and 2.7 years for HDR patients. Toxicities attributed to APBI included erythema, edema, tenderness, pain, and infection. Of the 66 patients treated with HDR APBI, 2 (3%) had Grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Of the 33 patients treated with LDR, 3 (9%) had Grade 3 or 4 toxicity during brachytherapy. Late toxicities included skin thickening, fibrosis, breast tenderness, and telangiectasias. No patient experienced late Grade 4 toxicity; the rate of Grade 3 toxicity was 18% for the LDR and 4% for the HDR groups.

CONCLUSION

Acute and late toxicity for this invasive breast radiation technique was modest and acceptable. Patients receiving chemotherapy, a nonprotocol therapy, had a greater rate of Grade 3 toxicity. The study design did not allow for this to be tested statistically.

Randomized phase II study of neoadjuvant combined-modality chemoradiation for distal rectal cancer: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Trial 0012

PURPOSE

To evaluate the rate of pathologic complete response and toxicity of neoadjuvant chemoradiation for advanced T3/T4 distal rectal cancers in a randomized phase II study

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with clinical T3/T4 distal rectal cancers were randomly assigned in a phase II study to receive combined neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection. Patients were randomly assigned to receive continuous venous infusion (CVI) fluorouracil (FU) 225 mg/m2 per day, 7 days per week, plus pelvic hyperfractionated radiation 55.2 to 60 Gy at 1.2 Gy bid (arm 1) or CVI FU 225 mg/m2 per day Monday to Friday, 120 hours per week plus irinotecan 50 mg/m2 once weekly for 4 weeks plus pelvic radiation therapy 50.4 to 54 Gy at 1.8 Gy per day (arm 2). Surgery was performed 4 to 10 weeks after completion of neoadjuvant therapy. The primary end point of this study was pathologic complete response (pCR). Secondary end points included acute and late normal tissue morbidity.

RESULTS

A total of 106 patients were entered onto the study, with 103 assessable for response. The overall resectability rate was 93%. The median time to surgery was 7 weeks. Tumor downstaging was observed in 78% of patients in both arms. The pCR rate for all assessable patients was 26% in each arm. For patients who had surgery, the pCR rate was also the same (28%) in both arms. Acute and late toxicity was also similar. Grade 3 and 4 acute hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity occurred in 13% and 38% in arm 1 and 12% and 45% in arm 2, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although the overall complete response rate and toxicity seems similar in both arms, this is the first multi-institutional study to establish a relatively high (28%) pCR rate after neoadjuvant therapy.

Herpes folliculitis: clinical, histopathological, and molecular pathologic observations

BACKGROUND

Herpes folliculitis is a rare manifestation of herpes virus infection and it is often misdiagnosed. Diagnostic criteria are not well established, only 24 patients being reported in the literature. Recently it has been suggested that herpetic folliculitis is more common in infections with varicella zoster (VZV) than in those with herpes simplex viruses (HSV-1 and -2).

OBJECTIVES

To refine diagnostic criteria for folliculitis caused by VZV, HSV-1 and HSV-2, and to study whether follicular involvement enables morphological differentiation between VZV and HSV infections.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients with herpetic infection of follicular epithelium were assessed clinically and histopathologically. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) studies for specific DNA of herpes viruses were performed on paraffin-embedded biopsy specimens.

RESULTS

In 17 of our cases PCR was positive for VZV, four were positive for HSV-1, none for HSV-2. The clinical presentation of herpes folliculitis often lacked vesicles or pustules (14/21). Histopathological features were often devoid of ballooning (12/21), multinucleated giant cells (12/21) and keratinocytes with steel grey nuclei (15/21). The most consistent findings were lymphocytic folliculitis and perifolliculitis (20/21) and necrotic keratinocytes in follicular epithelium (12/21). In zoster, but not in varicella eruption or HSV infections, follicular involvement was unaccompanied by marked changes in the epidermal surface.

CONCLUSIONS

In biopsy specimens taken from herpes virus infections, involvement of follicular units is more commonly encountered in VZV infections compared with HSV infections. Early in the course, herpes folliculitis presents as lymphocytic folliculitis devoid of epithelial changes considered to be diagnostic of herpes virus infections. Exclusive involvement of follicles is rather typical of zoster.

High-light stress does not impair biomass accumulation of sun-acclimated tropical tree seedlings (Calophyllum longifolium Willd. and Tectona grandis L. f.)

Studies with seedlings of tropical rainforest trees ( Calophyllum longifolium Willd.; Tectona grandis L. f.) were designed to test whether high-light stress affects photosynthetic performance and growth. Seedlings were cultivated in pots at a field site in Central Panama (9 degrees N) and separated into two groups: (1) plants exposed to full solar radiation; (2) plants subjected to automatic neutral shading (48 %) whenever visible irradiance surpassed 1000, 1200, or 1600 micromol photons m-2 s-1. After 2-4 months, chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm ratio), photosynthetic net CO2 uptake, pigment composition, alpha-tocopherol content of leaves, and plant biomass accumulation were measured. Fully sun-exposed, compared to periodically shaded plants, experienced substantial high-light stress around midday, indicated by photoinhibition of photosystem II and depressed net CO2 uptake. Higher contents of xanthophyll cycle pigments, lutein, and alpha-tocopherol showed an enhancement of photoprotection in fully sun-exposed plants. However, in all experiments, the maximum capacity of net CO2 uptake and plant dry mass did not differ significantly between the two treatments. Thus, in these experiments, high-light stress did not impair productivity of the seedlings studied. Obviously, the continuously sun-exposed plants were capable of fully compensating for any potential costs associated with photoinhibition and repair of photosystem II, reduced CO2 assimilation, and processes of high-light acclimation.

A phase I/II trial to evaluate three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy confined to the region of the lumpectomy cavity for stage I/II breast carcinoma: Initial report of feasibility and reproducibility of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Study 0319

BACKGROUND

This prospective study (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Study 0319) examines the use of three-dimensional conformal external beam radiation therapy to deliver accelerated partial breast irradiation. Reproducibility, as measured by technical feasibility, was the primary end point with the goal of demonstrating whether the technique is widely applicable in a multicenter setting before a Phase III trial is undertaken.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This study was designed such that if fewer than 5 cases out of the first 42 patients evaluable were scored as unacceptable, the treatment would be considered reproducible. Patients received 38.5 Gy in 3.85 Gy/fraction delivered twice daily. The clinical target volume included the lumpectomy cavity plus a 10-15-mm margin bounded by 5 mm within the skin surface and the lung-chest wall interface. The planning target volume (PTV) included the clinical target volume plus a 10-mm margin. Treatment plans were judged as follows: (1) No variations (total coverage), 95% isodose surface covers 100% of the PTV and all specified critical normal tissue dose-volume histogram (DVH) limits met. (2) Minor variation (marginal coverage), 95% isodose surface covers between > or = 95% and <100% of the PTV. No portion of PTV receives <93% of prescription (isocenter) dose. All specified critical normal tissue DVH limits fall within 5% of the guidelines. (3) Major variation (miss), 95% isodose surface covers <95% of the PTV. Portion of PTV receives <93% of prescription isocenter dose. Any critical normal tissue DVH limit exceeds 5% of the specified value.

RESULTS

A total of 58 patients were enrolled on this study between 8/15/03 and 4/30/04, 5 of whom were ineligible or did not receive protocol treatment. Two additional patients were excluded, one because the on-study form was not submitted, and the other because no treatment planning material was submitted. This primary end point analysis is based on the first 42 (out of 51) evaluable patients, which were accrued from 17 different institutions (31 centers were credentialed for case enrollment, but because of rapid accrual, not all centers were able to submit cases before trial closure). These 42 patients had the following characteristics: median age was 61 years; 48% had a maximum tumor dimension of <1 cm; 86% had invasive ductal carcinoma; 64% were postmenopausal; the location of tumor was upper outer for 40% and upper central for 21%; 79% had no chemotherapy, and 64% had no hormonal therapy. There were 4 cases with major variations (all 4 related to normal tissue DVHs exceeding 5% of the specified limit). A total of 32 cases with minor variations in treatment plans were detected (16 related to normal tissue DVHs exceeding the specified limits [by < or = 5%], 6 related to suboptimal coverage of the PTV, and 10 related to both). There were 6 cases with no variations. Of the 51 total evaluable patients, 1 additional major variation was noted (PTV receiving <93% of the prescription dose). An additional 5 cases with minor variations in treatment plans were detected (3 related to normal tissue DVHs exceeding the specified limits [by < or = 5%], 1 related to suboptimal coverage of the PTV, and 1 related to both). There were 3 more cases with no variations.

CONCLUSION

Accelerated partial breast irradiation using three-dimensional conformal external beam radiation therapy was shown in this preliminary analysis of the first 42 evaluable patients to be technically feasible and reproducible in a multi-institutional trial using exceptionally strict dosimetric criteria.

Toxicity after three-dimensional radiotherapy for prostate cancer on RTOG 9406 dose Level V

PURPOSE

This is the first report of toxicity outcomes at dose Level V (78 Gy) on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9406 for Stages T1-T2 adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 225 patients were entered in this cooperative group, Phase I-II dose-escalation trial of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for localized carcinoma of the prostate treated to a dose of 78 Gy (Level V). Of these patients, 219 were analyzed for acute and 218 for late toxicity. A minimum of 2 Gy/fraction was prescribed to the planning target volume (PTV). Patients were stratified according to the risk of seminal vesicle invasion as determined by Gleason score and presenting prostate-specific antigen level. Group 1 patients had clinical Stages T1-T2 tumors with a seminal vesicle invasion risk of <15%. Group 2 patients had clinical Stages T1-T2 tumors with a seminal vesicle invasion risk of >/=15%. Patients in Group 1 were prescribed 78 Gy to a prostate PTV. Patients in Group 2 were prescribed 54 Gy to the prostate and seminal vesicles (PTV1) followed by a boost to the prostate only (PTV2) to 78 Gy. PTV margins of between 5 and 10 mm were required. The average time at risk for late Grade 3+ toxicity after therapy completion was 23.2 and 23.1 months for Groups 1 and 2, respectively. The frequency of Grade 3 or worse late effects was compared with a similar group of patients treated in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) studies 7506 and 7706, with length of follow-up adjustments made for the interval from therapy completion. A second comparison was made with 170 patients treated to dose Level III (79.2 Gy in 1.8 Gy/fraction) to see whether the fraction size affected toxicity. Unlike other dose levels, patients treated at dose Level III had treatment prescribed as a minimum to the gross tumor volume. This effectively lowered the volume of the rectum treated to the study dose.

RESULTS

Acute toxicity at dose Level V (78 Gy) was remarkably low, with Grade 3 acute effects reported in only 4% of Group 1 and 2% of Group 2 patients. No Grade 4 or 5 acute toxicity was reported. There was no statistically significant difference in rates of acute toxicities in patients who were treated to 79.2 Gy at 1.8 Gy/fraction or 78 Gy at 2.0 Gy/fraction. Late toxicity continues to be low compared with RTOG historical controls. The observed rate of Grade 3 or worse late effects for Group 1 (6 cases) was significantly lower (p = 0.0042) than the 18.2 cases that would have been expected from the historical control. The observed rate for Group 2 (8 cases) was lower than the 15.5 cases expected, but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.06). A trend was noted that Group 2 patients treated on dose Level V had more late Grade 3 or worse toxicity than patients treated to a similar dose on Level III (7% vs. 1%, p = 0.06). A significantly (p < 0.0001) greater incidence of late Grade 2 or greater toxicity occurred in patients treated at dose Level V (30% and 33% for Groups 1 and 2, respectively) than at dose Level III (13% and 9% for Groups 1 and 2, respectively). The longer follow-up at dose Level III suggests these differences may increase with additional follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Tolerance to three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy with 78 Gy in 2-Gy fractions remains better than expected compared with historical controls. The magnitude of any effect from fraction size and treatment volume requires additional follow-up.

Feasibility of RNA collection for micro-array gene expression analysis in the treatment of cervical carcinoma: a scientific correlate of RTOG C-0128

PURPOSE

To determine the feasibility of RNA collection in a multi-institutional cooperative group setting to be utilized for micro-array gene expression analysis, and to describe the methodology.

METHODS

RTOG C0128, a phase I-II, protocol was designed to look at the safety and efficacy of external beam radiation therapy to 45 Gy with concomitant 5-FU and cisplatin chemotherapy, brachytherapy to deliver 85 Gy to point A, and Celecoxib at 400 mg twice daily for 1 year. Patients had the option of participating in a tissue collection portion of the protocol to be utilized for micro-array gene expression analysis before treatment and at the time of the first implant. RNA quality was determined by two parameters: the absorbance ratio at 260 nm/280 nm, and by the ratio of the integrated peak of 28S RNA to 18S RNA after gel electrophoresis.

RESULTS

From August 2001 to March 2004, 84 patients were accrued to the trial, and tissue was obtained prior to initiation of therapy on 34 patients (40%). FIGO stages for the patients who provided tissue were IB (23%), II (57%), and IIIA-IVA (20%). Additionally, biopsies were obtained at the time of the first implant from 22 of the accrued patients making paired samples available on 26% for RNA extraction and micro-array gene expression analysis. The mean +/- SEM amount of tissue obtained pretreatment was 97 +/- 13 mg compared with 51 +/- 8 mg for tissue obtained at the time of the first implant (P = 0.009). The mean total RNA extracted from the samples prior to treatment was 119 +/- 19 microg versus 35 +/- 6 microg at the time of the first procedure (P = 0.001). The RNA quality was assessed via the absorbance ratio at 260 nm divided by 280 nm. The mean values pretreatment and at first implant were 1.87 +/- 0.07 versus 1.66 +/- 0.11, respectively (P = 0.002); however, the integrated peak of 28S RNA to 18S RNA after gel electrophoresis was not significantly different (P = 0.26).

CONCLUSIONS

RNA extraction for gene expression analysis can be successfully performed in the multi-institutional cooperative group setting. Fresh tissue samples were obtained on 40% of accrued patients prior to treatment. The amount of biopsy material and the quantity of RNA extracted were greater prior to treatment compared with the first implant. The quality of RNA was superior prior to treatment as measured by the ratio of absorbance at 260/280 nm. These results indicate that gene expression analysis is feasible in the cooperative group setting utilizing amplification techniques for the RNA. Hopefully, this will allow for improvement in prognosis, therapeutic development, and correlation with acute and late toxicities in patients with cancer.

Health-related quality of life in men receiving prostate brachytherapy on RTOG 98-05

PURPOSE

To prospectively assess health-related quality of life (HRQOL) during the first year after treatment with prostate brachytherapy (PB) alone for T1c-2a prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety-eight patients from 24 institutions were eligible and properly entered on this study. All patients were treated with PB alone using I-125 (Oncura Model 6711). The prescription dose was 145 Gy. Three separate health-related quality of life questionnaires (HRQOL) (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate [FACT-P], Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire [SAQ], and International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS]) were self-administered before and after PB (baseline; 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after PB). The standard error of the mean (SEM) was used to analyze changes in HRQOL scores over time. Patients who improved greater than the SEM were categorized as improved; patients that declined greater than the SEM were categorized as declined; patients were otherwise categorized as stable. All changes are measured using the pretreatment HRQOL score as baseline.

RESULTS

The percentage of men who reported the ability to have an erection decreased from 73% at baseline (65% unassisted, 8% assisted) to 57% at 1 year (36% unassisted, 21% assisted). The rate of urinary incontinence increased to 14% at 6 months but had decreased to 1% at the 12-month follow-up. At 1 year after PB, 80% of men reported decreased sexual functioning according to SAQ scores. More than 60% of men reported decreased urinary function at 12 months compared with baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

This article represents the first prospective, multi-institutional study of HRQOL in men treated with PB and demonstrates that patients undergoing PB have a very high overall HRQOL. The rate of incontinence by 1 year after PB is low, but many patients continue to have obstructive symptoms at 1 year. Although 78% of 1-year respondents state that they can achieve an erection with or without assistance, almost 50% report a decrease in sexual function.

Expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor and Her-2 are predictors of favorable outcome and reduced complete response rates, respectively, in patients with muscle-invading bladder cancers treated by concurrent radiation and cisplatin-based chemotherapy: a report from the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group

PURPOSE

Erb-1 (epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR) and Erb-2 (Her-2) are two of the best characterized members in the EGFR pathway. In many tumor types, overexpression of these proteins is associated with enhanced malignant potential. Our objective in this study was to investigate the clinical relevance of EGFR and Her-2 expression in bladder cancer cases from four prospective Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) bladder preservation trials using cisplatin-containing chemoradiation (RTOG 8802, 8903, 9506, and 9706).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Tumors from 73 cases from patients with muscle-invading T2-T4a bladder cancers had slides interpretable for EGFR staining; 55 cases had slides interpretable for Her-2 staining. Additionally, the respective prognostic values of p53, pRB, and p16 immunostaining were concomitantly examined. Staining and interpretation of staining were done in a blinded manner, without knowledge of clinical outcome. Staining was judged as positive or negative. Subsequently, staining was correlated with clinical outcome.

RESULTS

On univariate analysis, EGFR positivity was significantly associated with improved overall survival (p = 0.044); disease-specific survival (DSS) (p = 0.042); and DSS with intact bladder (p = 0.021). There was also a trend for association between EGFR expression and reduced frequency of distant metastasis (p = 0.06). On multivariate analysis adding tumor stage, tumor grade, whether a visibly complete transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) was done or not, and patient age to the model, EGFR positivity was significantly associated with improved DSS. On univariate analysis, Her-2 positivity was significantly associated with reduced complete response (CR) rates (50% vs. 81%, p = 0.026) after chemoradiation which remained significant on multivariate analysis. The other markers examined in this study were not found to have any prognostic value in this setting.

CONCLUSION

Epidermal growth factor receptor expression appears to correlate significantly with improved outcome in bladder cancer, whereas Her-2 expression is significantly associated only with reduced CR rates after chemoradiation. Further investigations are warranted into how EGFR family members regulate response to chemoradiation in bladder cancer and their potential therapeutic implications.

Androgen suppression adjuvant to definitive radiotherapy in prostate carcinoma--long-term results of phase III RTOG 85-31

PURPOSE

Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocol 85-31 was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of adjuvant androgen suppression, using goserelin, in unfavorable prognosis carcinoma of the prostate treated with definitive radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eligible patients were those with palpable primary tumor extending beyond the prostate (clinical Stage T3) or those with regional lymphatic involvement. Patients who had undergone prostatectomy were eligible if penetration through the prostatic capsule to the margin of resection and/or seminal vesicle involvement was documented histologically. Stratification was based on histologic differentiation, nodal status, acid phosphatase status, and prior prostatectomy. The patients were randomized to either RT and adjuvant goserelin (Arm I) or RT alone followed by observation and application of goserelin at relapse (Arm II). In Arm I, the drug was to be started during the last week of RT and was to be continued indefinitely or until signs of progression.

RESULTS

Between 1987 and 1992, when the study was closed, 977 patients were entered: 488 to Arm I and 489 to Arm II. As of July 2003, the median follow-up for all patients was 7.6 years and for living patients was 11 years. At 10 years, the absolute survival rate was significantly greater for the adjuvant arm than for the control arm: 49% vs. 39%, respectively (p = 0.002). The 10-year local failure rate for the adjuvant arm was 23% vs. 38% for the control arm (p <0.0001). The corresponding 10-year rates for the incidence of distant metastases and disease-specific mortality was 24% vs. 39% (p <0.001) and 16% vs. 22% (p = 0.0052), respectively, both in favor of the adjuvant arm.

CONCLUSION

In a population of patients with unfavorable prognosis carcinoma of the prostate, androgen suppression applied as an adjuvant after definitive RT was associated not only with a reduction in disease progression but in a statistically significant improvement in absolute survival. The improvement in survival appeared preferentially in patients with a Gleason score of 7-10.

Toxicity and outcome results of RTOG 9311: a phase I-II dose-escalation study using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung carcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate prospectively the acute and late morbidities from a multiinstitutional three-dimensional radiotherapy dose-escalation study for inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 179 patients were enrolled in a Phase I-II three-dimensional radiotherapy dose-escalation trial. Of the 179 patients, 177 were eligible. The use of concurrent chemotherapy was not allowed. Twenty-five patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were stratified at escalating radiation dose levels depending on the percentage of the total lung volume that received >20 Gy with the treatment plan (V(20)). Patients with a V(20) <25% (Group 1) received 70.9 Gy in 33 fractions, 77.4 Gy in 36 fractions, 83.8 Gy in 39 fractions, and 90.3 Gy in 42 fractions, successively. Patients with a V(20) of 25-36% (Group 2) received doses of 70.9 Gy and 77.4 Gy, successively. The treatment arm for patients with a V(20) > or =37% (Group 3) closed early secondary to poor accrual (2 patients) and the perception of excessive risk for the development of pneumonitis. Toxicities occurring or persisting beyond 90 days after the start of radiotherapy were scored as late toxicities. The estimated toxicity rates were calculated on the basis of the cumulative incidence method.

RESULTS

The following acute Grade 3 or worse toxicities were observed for Group 1: 70.9 Gy (1 case of weight loss), 77.4 Gy (nausea and hematologic toxicity in 1 case each), 83.8 Gy (1 case of hematologic toxicity), and 90.3 Gy (3 cases of lung toxicity). The following acute Grade 3 or worse toxicities were observed for Group 2: none at 70.9 Gy and 2 cases of lung toxicity at 77.4 Gy. No patients developed acute Grade 3 or worse esophageal toxicity. The estimated rate of Grade 3 or worse late lung toxicity at 18 months was 7%, 16%, 0%, and 13% for Group 1 patients receiving 70.9, 77.4, 83.8, or 90.3 Gy, respectively. Group 2 patients had an estimated late lung toxicity rate of 15% at 18 months for both 70.9 and 77.4 Gy. The prognostic factors for late pneumonitis in multivariate analysis were the mean lung dose and V(20). The estimated rate of late Grade 3 or worse esophageal toxicity at 18 months was 8%, 0%, 4%, and 6%, for Group 1 patients receiving 70.9, 77.4, 83.8, 90.3 Gy, respectively, and 0% and 5%, respectively, for Group 2 patients receiving 70.9 and 77.4 Gy. The dyspnea index scoring at baseline and after therapy for functional impairment, magnitude of task, and magnitude of effort revealed no change in 63%, functional pulmonary loss in 23%, and pulmonary improvement in 14% of patients. The observed locoregional control and overall survival rates were each similar among the study arms within each dose level of Groups 1 and 2. Locoregional control was achieved in 50-78% of patients. Thirty-one patients developed regional nodal failure. The location of nodal failure in relationship to the RT volume was documented in 28 of these 31 patients. Twelve patients had isolated elective nodal failures. Fourteen patients had regional failure in irradiated nodal volumes. Two patients had both elective nodal and irradiated nodal failure.

CONCLUSIONS

The radiation dose was safely escalated using three-dimensional conformal techniques to 83.8 Gy for patients with V(20) values of <25% (Group 1) and to 77.4 Gy for patients with V(20) values between 25% and 36% (Group 2), using fraction sizes of 2.15 Gy. The 90.3-Gy dose level was too toxic, resulting in dose-related deaths in 2 patients. Elective nodal failure occurred in <10% of patients.

Androgen Suppression Plus Radiation Versus Radiation Alone for Patients With Stage D1/Pathologic Node-Positive Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate: Updated Results Based on National Prospective Randomized Trial Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 85-31

Purpose

To update the effect of immediate androgen suppression in conjunction with standard external-beam irradiation versus radiation alone on a group of histologically lymph node-positive patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Materials and Methods

A national prospective randomized trial (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 85-31) of standard external-beam irradiation plus immediate androgen suppression versus external-beam irradiation alone was initiated in 1985 for patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the prostate. One hundred seventy-three patients in this trial had histologically involved lymph nodes. Ninety-eight patients received radiation plus immediate androgen suppression (luteinizing hormone–releasing hormone [LHRH] agonist), whereas 75 patients received radiation alone with hormonal manipulation instituted at the time of relapse.

Results

With a median follow-up of 6.5 years for all patients and 9.5 years for living patients, estimated progression-free survival with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level less than 1.5 ng/mL at 5 and 9 years was 54% and 10%, respectively, for patients who received immediate LHRH agonist versus 33% and 4% for patients who received radiation alone with hormonal manipulation instituted at time of relapse (P < .0001). Multivariate analysis revealed radiation therapy and immediate hormonal manipulation as having a statistically significant impact on all end points analyzed: absolute survival, disease-specific failure, metastatic failure, and biochemical control with PSA less than 4 ng/mL and less than 1.5 ng/mL.

Conclusion

Pending the results of randomized trials, patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate who have pathologically involved pelvic lymph nodes (pathologic node-positive or clinical stage D1) should be considered for external-beam irradiation plus immediate hormonal manipulation rather than radiation alone with hormone manipulation at the time of relapse.

Penile bulb dose and impotence after three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer on RTOG 9406: Findings from a prospective, multi-institutional, phase I/II dose-escalation study

PURPOSE

To assess the relationship between the dose to the bulb of the penis and the risk of impotence in men treated on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9406.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Men enrolled on a Phase I/II dose-escalation study, RTOG 9406, who were reported to be potent at entry and evaluable (n = 158) were selected for inclusion. Follow-up evaluations were scheduled every 3, 4, and 6 months for the first, second, and the third through fifth years, then annually. At each follow-up visit an assessment of potency status was made. Penile structures were defined by a single observer blinded to the potency status, using Web-based, on-line software. The dosimetry for penile structures was calculated at the Quality Assurance Center at Washington University and provided to RTOG Statistical Headquarters to determine whether there was a relationship between dose and impotence.

RESULTS

Patients whose median penile dose was > or = 52.5 Gy had a greater risk of impotence compared with those receiving <52.5 Gy (p = 0.039). In a multivariate analysis neither age, the dose to the prostate, nor the use of hormonal therapy correlated with the risk of impotence.

CONCLUSIONS

Dose to the bulb of the penis seems to be associated with the risk of radiation-induced impotence.

Preliminary analysis of RTOG 9708: adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy combined with cisplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy after surgery for patients with high-risk endometrial cancer

PURPOSE

Patients with completely resected high-risk endometrial cancer have a risk of disease recurrence even with the addition of adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy (RT). A Phase II study was completed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group to assess the safety and toxicity of chemotherapy when combined with pelvic RT for these patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eligibility requirements included a total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with Grade 2 or 3 endometrial adenocarcinoma with >50% myometrial invasion, stromal invasion of the cervix, or pelvic-confined extrauterine disease. This study was designed to administer 4500 cGy in 25 fractions to the pelvis, along with cisplatin (50 mg/m(2)) on Days 1 and 28. Vaginal brachytherapy with a low-dose-rate applicator (1 x 20 Gy to the surface) or high-dose-rate applicator (3 x 6 Gy to the surface) was performed after external beam RT. Four courses of cisplatin (50 mg/m(2)) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)) were given at 4-week intervals after RT completion.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients were entered between October 1997 and April 1999. Two patients were ineligible (one with previous bladder cancer and one who had undergone surgery >8 weeks before the start of RT). Follow-up ranged from 6.9 to 48.8 months (median, 28.7 months). The disease was Stage III, II, and I in 66%, 16%, and 18% of patients, respectively. Two patients were not assessable because of incomplete treatment data. The protocol completion rate was 98% (41 of 42 assessable patients). Acute toxicity during RT/chemotherapy was Grade 1 in 27%, Grade 2 in 43%, Grade 3 in 27%, and Grade 4 in 2%. During adjuvant chemotherapy, the toxicity was Grade 1 in 7%, Grade 2 in 7%, Grade 3 in 21%, and Grade 4 in 62%. Severe toxicity was primarily hematologic. Chronic toxicity was Grade 1 in 20%, Grade 2 in 39%, Grade 3 in 16%, and Grade 4 in 2%, including 1 patient with a Grade 4 small bowel complication. At 24 months, the pelvic recurrence, regional recurrence, distant recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival rate was 2%, 3%, 17%, 83%, and 90%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This treatment protocol demonstrated an excellent treatment completion rate and expected toxicity. Longer follow-up is needed to assess the outcome. To assess the efficacy of this adjuvant treatment program, a Phase III trial (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9905) was designed with high-risk uterine-confined disease to be randomized between pelvic RT alone and pelvic RT with chemotherapy.