Emergency treatment of anaphylaxis in infants and children

Anaphylaxis is a severe, acute and potentially life-threatening condition, often in response to an allergen. Patients experiencing anaphylaxis can present with cutaneous, respiratory, cardiovascular or gastrointestinal manifestations. Epinephrine given intramuscularly remains the mainstay of treatment for this condition. Other second-line therapies, such as inhaled beta-2 agonists, H1 and H2 receptor antagonists and corticosteroids, may play a role in resolving respiratory and cutaneous signs and symptoms. Biphasic reactions may occur during the resolution phase of symptoms and, thus, all patients should be observed for a minimum of 4 h to 6 h before discharge from hospital. On discharge, all patients should be prescribed epinephrine autoinjectors, and referred to an allergist or immunologist for further evaluation and education.

Transmural strains in the ovine left ventricular lateral wall during diastolic filling

Rapid early diastolic left ventricular (LV) filling requires a highly compliant chamber immediately after systole, allowing inflow at low driving pressures. The transmural LV deformations associated with such filling are not completely understood. We sought to characterize regional transmural LV strains during diastole, with focus on early filling, in ovine hearts at 1 week and 8 weeks after myocardial marker implantation. In seven normal sheep hearts, 13 radiopaque markers were inserted to silhouette the LV chamber and a transmural beadset was implanted into the lateral equatorial LV wall to measure transmural strains. Four-dimensional marker dynamics were obtained 1 week and 8 weeks thereafter with biplane videofluoroscopy in closed-chest, anesthetized animals. LV transmural strains in both cardiac and fiber-sheet coordinates were studied from filling onset to the end of early filling (EOEF, 100 ms after filling onset) and at end diastole. At the 8 week study, subepicardial circumferential strain (ECC) had reached its final value already at EOEF, while longitudinal and radial strains were nearly zero at this time. Subepicardial ECC and fiber relengthening (Eff) at EOEF were reduced to 1 compared with 8 weeks after surgery (ECC:0.02+/-0.01 to 0.08+/-0.02 and Eff:0.00+/-0.01 to 0.03+/-0.01, respectively, both P<0.05). Subepicardial ECC during early LV filling was associated primarily with fiber-normal and sheet-normal shears at the 1 week study, but to all three fiber-sheet shears and fiber relengthening at the 8 week study. These changes in LV subepicardial mechanics provide a possible mechanistic basis for regional myocardial lusitropic function, and may add to our understanding of LV myocardial diastolic dysfunction.

Effect of macroscopic vascular invasion (MVI), extrahepatic spread (EHS), and ECOG performance status (ECOG PS) on outcome in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with sorafenib: Analysis of two phase III, randomized, double-blind trials

4580^

Background: The landmark phase III SHARP trial (Llovet et al, N Engl J Med, 2008) showed that sorafenib is effective and safe for the treatment of advanced HCC. These results were confirmed in an Asian population in the phase III Asia-Pacific (AP) study (Cheng et al, Lancet Oncol, 2009). We compared outcomes of sorafenib treatment in patients enrolled in the SHARP and AP trials with known baseline predictors of poor prognosis. Methods: Patients with advanced, unresectable, measurable HCC, ECOG PS 0–2, Child-Pugh A, and no prior systemic therapy for HCC were randomized to sorafenib 400 mg BID or placebo (SHARP: N=602; AP: N=226). Patients in the AP study had more evolved disease and a predominance of hepatitis B infection. Endpoints included overall survival (OS), disease-control rate (DCR; defined as complete/partial response or stable disease by RECIST, maintained for ≥28 days from first demonstration of response), and safety. Results: Efficacy results are shown in the table . The incidence of grade 3/4 drug-related adverse events (AEs) across subgroups in each study was consistent with the overall population for each study. The most common grade 3/4 AEs in all sorafenib populations were hand-foot skin reaction and diarrhea. Conclusions: Sorafenib is effective and safe for the treatment of advanced HCC in patients globally, irrespective of baseline ECOG PS and presence or absence of MVI and/or EHS.

[Table: see text]

[Table: see text]

ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy and Exceptions

In compliance with the guidelines established by the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy (J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 20;24[3]:519–521) and the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), ASCO strives to promote balance, independence, objectivity, and scientific rigor through disclosure of financial and other interests, and identification and management of potential conflicts. According to the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy, the following financial and other relationships must be disclosed: employment or leadership position, consultant or advisory role, stock ownership, honoraria, research funding, expert testimony, and other remuneration (J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 20;24[3]:520). The ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy disclosure requirements apply to all authors who submit abstracts to the Annual Meeting.

For clinical trials that began accrual on or after April 29, 2004, ASCO's Policy places some restrictions on the financial relationships of principal investigators (J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 20;24[3]:521). If a principal investigator holds any restricted relationships, his or her abstract will be ineligible for placement in the 2009 Annual Meeting unless the ASCO Ethics Committee grants an exception. Among the circumstances that might justify an exception are that the principal investigator (1) is a widely acknowledged expert in a particular therapeutic area; (2) is the inventor of a unique technology or treatment being evaluated in the clinical trial; or (3) is involved in international clinical oncology research and has acted consistently with recognized international standards of ethics in the conduct of clinical research. NIH-sponsored trials are exempt from the Policy restrictions. Abstracts for which authors requested and have been granted an exception in accordance with ASCO's Policy are designated with a caret symbol (^) in the Annual Meeting Proceedings.

For more information about the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy and the exceptions process, please visit www.asco.org/conflictofinterest .

A phase II study of bevacizumab (B) and erlotinib (E) in combination for Asian patients (pts) with advanced/metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): An interim safety report

4585

Background: Asian pts with advanced HCC have a poor prognosis, and a median survival of 2–4 months with best supportive care (ph III). As HCCs are highly vascular tumors, dual inhibition of VEGF and EGFR with B plus E is an attractive combination strategy. B has demonstrated promising phase II results in 34 HCC patients, with 75% non-progression at 16 weeks (wks) (65% in Caucasians) (Thomas et al., 2007). However, 6–11% of pts had variceal bleeding, some cases of which were fatal. This study was initiated to investigate the safety and efficacy of B+E in Asian HCC pts. Methods: Screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) was used to exclude pts with high risk of variceal bleeding. Asian pts with advanced/metastatic, measurable HCC who were unsuitable for surgery or other loco-regional therapies received B 5mg/kg q2w i.v. and E 150mg/day orally. The primary endpoint was PFS at 16 wks. Responses were evaluated using RECIST. Tumor tissue samples were collected for biomarker analysis. Results: Baseline characteristics of the 51 pts enrolled between March and October 2008 were median age: 58 years (range 26–84); male/female: 44/7; ECOG PS 0/1/2: 30/20/1; Child-Pugh A/B: 50/1; BCLC stage C n=44 (88%); hepatitis B/C/B+C/nonB+nonC: 42/4/3/2; grade I/II varices n=16 (none with red sign). Pts received a median 8 wks of study treatment. No variceal bleeding was observed; 3 pts had upper GI bleeding (grade 1/2; 2 peptic ulcer, 1 gastritis). See table for most common toxicities. 7/10 deaths were due to disease progression, none were due to study treatment. At the time of analysis, 2 pts had a confirmed partial response (PR; duration 24+ and 8+ wks). 1 pt with an unconfirmed PR continued on treatment. Data for the primary analysis were immature. Conclusions: Bevacizumab plus erlotinib was well tolerated. Screening EGD was feasible and reduced the risk of variceal bleeding. Follow-up is ongoing.

[Table: see text]

[Table: see text]

A phase II trial of thalidomide plus tegafur/uracil for patients with advanced/metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): Final report

e15533

Background: Thalidomide (T) is an anti-angiogenic agent with modest activity in advanced/metastatic HCC. Tegafur/uracil (UFT) is an oral prodrug of 5-fluorouracil with activity against various gastrointestinal cancers. Metronomic chemotherapy has been shown to have anti-angiogenic and anti-cancer effect in preclinical and clinical models. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the combination of T and metronomic UFT as first-line therapy for advanced HCC. Methods: Patients (Pts) with advanced HCC not treatable by surgery or other loco-regional therapies received T 100mg bid and UFT 125mg/m2 (based on tegafur) bid continuously. Treatment was continued in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was response rate (RR) by RECIST; secondary endpoints were disease control rate (CR+PR+SD), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: Between Jul 2006 and Jul 2008, 43 intent-to-treat pts (M/F 41/2, median age 55) were enrolled. Baseline characteristics were HBsAg(+)/anti-HCV(+)/both(+) /both(-) 31/6/1/7; AJCC stage II/III/IV 2/18/23; BCLC stage B/C 1/42; CLIP score ≤3/4 27/16; portal vein thrombosis 65%; extrahepatic metastasis 58%; prior local treatment 72%. There were 4 PR (9.3%) and 10 SD (23.3%), with a disease control rate of 32.6%. Median OS was 4.6 (95% CI, 3.5–7.3) months and median PFS was 1.9 (95% CI, 1.8–2.6) months. The OS and PFS for pts with CLIP score ≤3 were 7.6 and 2.6 months, respectively. Grade 3 leucopenia developed in 1 (2.3%) pt. The most common treatment-related grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities were somnolence (n=4, 9.3%), GI bleeding (n=3, 7.0%), and elevated transaminase (n=2, 4.7%). No grade 4 toxicities occurred. Conclusions: The combination of T with metronomic UFT is a well-tolerated regimen with moderate activity for advanced HCC, and worth further exploration in pts with CLIP score ≤3.

[Table: see text]

A phase II study of gemcitabine-based chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) after triplet induction chemotherapy (ICT) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC): A Taiwan Cooperative Oncology Group (TCOG) study

e15562

The optimal management of LAPC remains controversial. The efficacy of CCRT is hampered by early systemic dissemination. To treat undetectable metastases and to select patients who are likely to benefit from CCRT, ICT followed by CCRT has recently been extensively evaluated in LAPC. Recently, we showed that triplet chemotherapy consisting of gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 (10 mg/m2/min) followed by oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 and 48-hour infusion of 5-FU/LV 3,000 and 150 mg/m2 Q 2 weeks, the GOFL regimen, is feasible and active for pts with APC. Chemo-naïve pts with histo- /cytologically proven unresectable LAPC, and bi-dimensionally measurable diseases were eligible. Patients who did not experience disease progression (PD) after 6 cycles of GOFL would had CCRT consisting of weekly gemcitabine 400mg/m2 plus 50.4Gy/28 fractions of radiation 4–6 weeks later. After CCRT, pts were re-evaluated for surgical intervention and those with unresectable disease would continue GOFL until PD, unacceptable toxicity, patient's refusal or death. Among the 50 enrolled pts (24F/26M, median age 58.5 years), 48 had definitively unresectable diseases. After induction GOFL, 16 (32%) pts were off-studied because of PD in 12 (24%) and ICT-related toxicity in 4 (8%, PD/UE group). Among the 34 (68%) with objective response or stable disease after 6 cycles of ICT, 27 (54%) who completed the assigned multimodality treatment are categorized as CCRT group; whiles 7 (14%) who either declined CCRT (in 5) or still on ICT (in 2) are categorized as non-CCRT group. The median PFS and OS for the ITT population were 9.1 and 14.5 months, respectively. The median PFS for PD/UE, non-CCRT and CCRT groups were 2.1, 8.2 and 12.8 months, respectively; whiles the OS were 8.5, 15.0 and 18.3 months, respectively. The most common grade 3–4 toxicities were neutropenia (40%), anemia (14%), infection (16%), nausea (26%), vomiting (20%). Grade 2–3 peripheral neuropathy was observed in 7 of 29 who received post-CCRT GOFL. Conclusion: Three months of triplet ICT followed by gemcitabine-based CCRT is feasible and likely to prolong the survival of selected LAPC pts. Prospective, randomization study is warranted to validate the findings.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy with/without esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

e15526

Background: To assess the feasibility of preoperative induction chemotherapy in addition to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) followed by esophagectomy if possible for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with a special emphasis on M1a or nodal M1b disease. Methods: Patients who had histologic proof of T3N1M0, M1a, or nodal M1b ESCC first received up to 3 courses of induction chemotherapy (paclitaxel 70 mg/m2 or docetaxel 40 mg/m2 IV 1-hr D 1, 8; cisplatin 35 mg/m2 IV 2-hr D 1, 8; 5-fluorouracil 2000 and leucovorin 300 mg/m2 IV 24-hr D 1, 8; repeated every 28 days). This was followed by CCRT (paclitaxel 35 mg/m2 1-hr D 1, 4 /wk, cisplatin 15 mg/m2 1-hr D 2, 5/wk, and radiotherapy 2 Gy D 1–5 /wk) (Lin CC et al. Ann Oncol 18:93–8,2007). When the accumulated radiation dose reached 40 Gy, the feasibility of esophagectomy was evaluated in all patients. In patients for whom esophagectomy was not feasible, CCRT was continued to a dose of 60 Gy. Results: Fifty-six patients (M:F = 51:5, median age 58, range 41–78) with locally advanced (T3N1M0:M1a:M1b[nodal] = 30:7:19) ESCC (upper:mid:lower = 15:25:16) were enrolled from June 22, 2006 to December 17, 2008. By December 31, 2008, 10 patients are still under protocol treatment. Eighteen (T3N1:M1a:M1b[nodal] = 14:3:1) (40%) and 20 of 46 patients underwent surgery and continued CCRT up to 60 Gy, respectively. Nine (T3N1:M1a:M1b[nodal] = 7:2:0) (20%) and 5 patients had pathologic complete response and microscopic residual disease, respectively. With a median follow-up of 8.4 months (range 0.5–30.8), 17 (T3N1:M1a:M1b[nodal] = 9:2:6) patients had relapse. Four and 13 patients had local recurrence and distant metastasis, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 20.3 months. The median overall survival had not reached yet with 1- and 2-year overall survival being 76 and 57%, respectively. There was no difference in progression- free or overall survival among patients with T3N1M0, M1a, or nodal M1b disease. Conclusions: Three-step strategy of preoperative taxane-based induction chemotherapy then CCRT followed by esosphagectomy if possible appears quite active in locally advanced ESCC patients with 46% having M1a or nodal M1b disease.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Evaluation of estrogen receptor expression as a prognostic factor for very young women (below 35 years) with breast cancer in Taiwan

e22163

Background: In the past two decades, the incidence of very young (<35 years) breast cancer in Taiwanese has been rapidly increasing to quite close to that of Caucasian Americans. However, the clinicopathological features of this group of patients appear to be different from their Western counterpart. Here, we sought to determine the prognostic value of ER expression for this newly emerging population in Taiwan. Methods: We retrospectively collected information on all consecutive very young patients (age <35 years) with stage I-III breast cancer treated at National Taiwan University Hospital between 1997 and 2005. ER expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections. Tumor with more than 10% positive nuclei was considered ER positive. Results: A total of 178 patients with a median age of 32 (range: 21–35) years were included. The median follow-up time was 62.5 (95% confidence interval, 42.0–64.2) months. Univariate analysis showed that ER expression was significantly associated with favorable OS (HR=0.48, P=0.03), but not with DFS (hazard ratio [HR]=0.79, P=0.42). Multivariate analysis showed that stage and ER were independent prognostic factors. Conclusions: In contrast to the findings in Caucasians, ER expression was an independent prognostic factor for favorable overall survival in Taiwanese patients with very young breast cancer.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Quality of life in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving first-line gefitinib monotherapy

9614

Background: Gefitinib is a potential first-line treatment option for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), especially for patients with activating mutations in the EGFR gene. However, little is known about patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in this patient population. The aims of this study were to explore the prognostic values of baseline HRQOL for time-to-treatment failure (TTF), as well as the predictors of repeatedly measured posttreatment HRQOL, in advanced NSCLC patients receiving first-line gefitinib. Methods: A total of 106 chemonaive patients with advanced NSCLC were enrolled in a phase II trial. Gefitinib was given at a dose of 250 mg/d. HRQOL was assessed monthly with the EuroQoL instrument (EQ-5D) and the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) questionnaire. Baseline HRQOL and clinical/molecular predictors of TTF were jointly examined by multiple Cox's proportional hazards model. The associations between the clinical/molecular factors and repeatedly measured posttreatment HRQOL were analyzed by fitting marginal linear regression model using the generalized estimating equations (GEE) method. Results: In this prospective study, HRQOL data were obtained from 94 patients. Baseline EQ-5D index (estimated hazard ratio = 0.286, 95% C.I.: 0.135–0.603, p = 0.001) and the presence of L858R EGFR mutation in adenocarcinoma (estimated hazard ratio = 0.520, 95% C.I.: 0.307–0.880, p = 0.015) were retained as independent prognostic factors in the final multiple Cox's proportional hazards model for TTF. According to preliminary GEE analysis of repeatedly measured posttreatment HRQOL, the patients with wild-type EGFR consistently had worse HRQOL in EQ-5D index (p < 0.0001), EQ-5D VAS score (p = 0.0002), and LCSS global score (p < 0.0001), respectively. Conclusions: In advanced NSCLC patients receiving first-line gefitinib, better baseline EQ-5D index and L858R EGFR mutation in adenocarcinoma predict longer TTF. In addition, patients with wild-type EGFR had worse posttreatment HRQOL.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.