P1-08-15: Pattern of Cardiac Monitoring and Risk of Trastuzumab Associated-Cardiac Dysfunction in a Clinical Practice: A Population Based Study

Background: Adjuvant trastuzumab therapy (ATT) in women with early-stage HER2+ breast cancer has been associated with significant reduction in the disease recurrence and mortality. Cardiac dysfunction (CD) is a known serious adverse effect of ATT. Although periodic cardiac monitoring is recommended during ATT, little is known about pattern of cardiac monitoring and incidence of CD in a clinical setting. The study aimed to determine extent of cardiac monitoring and rate of CD during ATT and to identify factors correlated with CD.

Methods: Medical records of women with localized HER+ breast cancer diagnosed between the years 2005–2007 in the province of Saskatchewan was reviewed. Women with advanced or recurrent disease or if they were treated in the setting of an adjuvant trastuzumab trial were excluded. A logistic regression analysis was performed to determine various clinical variables correlated with CD.

Results: A total 116 eligible women with median age of 54 yrs (range: 27–74) and median BMI of 27 (range: 44–17) were indentified. 40% had a cardiac risk factor & 30% were premenopausal. 51% had node positive & 53% had ER or PR+ breast cancer. 92% received anthracycline-based chemotherapy and 23% received sequential ATT. Of 62 patients with ER/PR+ breast cancer, 61% received adjuvant aromatase inhibitors. Baseline cardiac assessment was performed in 93% women. 98% women underwent periodic cardiac monitoring during ATT, 55% had monitoring performed at the interval of 3–4 months & 82% women had monitoring performed at the interval of 3–6 months. Mean baseline cardiac ejection fraction (EF%) prior to the commencement of chemotherapy and ATT were 65% & 63.9% respectively (p=NS). CD was observed in 32 (28%) women and only 4% were symptomatic. Trastuzumab was interrupted in 34%, and was discontinued in 20% women. Of 32 women with CD, 59% were referred to a cardiologist and 53% were treated with medication. CD was reversible in 84% cases. On multivariate analysis adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy was significantly correlated with cardiac dysfunction (Odd ratio 6.9 [95% CI: 1.4−33.0]). During the follow up period 18% women developed recurrent disease and 16% were died.

Conclusions: Our results confirm high compliance with cardiac monitoring, though not as frequently as recommended in the clinical trial setting. Overall the rate of symptomatic decline in cardiac function was similar to the rate reported in the clinical trials, however, a relatively higher incidence of asymptomatic decline in the left ventricle EF% was noted. Among various variables examined, adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy was associated with an increased risk of CD.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-08-15.

P1-17-05: Preliminary Results of a Randomized Phase 2 Study of PD 0332991, a Cyclin-Dependent Kinase (CDK) 4/6 Inhibitor, in Combination with Letrozole for First-Line Treatment of Patients (pts) with Post-Menopausal, ER+, HER2−Negative (HER2–) Advanced Breast Cancer

Background: PD 0332991 is an orally bioavailable selective inhibitor of CDK 4/6 and prevents cellular DNA synthesis by prohibiting progression of the cell cycle from G1 into the S phase. Preclinical evaluations suggest that reduction in CDKN2A (p16) expression and cyclin D1 (CCND1) overexpression confer susceptibility to PD 0332991 (Finn 2009). In addition, PD 0332991 was synergistic in combination with tamoxifen in vitro in ER+ human breast cancer cell lines. Based on these observations, a phase 1/2 study in combination with letrozole as first-line therapy for advanced ER+ post-menopausal breast cancer was initiated. The phase 1 part of the study (completed) determined the recommended phase 2 dose to be PD 0332991 125 mg QD on Schedule 3/1 (3 weeks on treatment followed by 1-week off treatment) in combination with letrozole 2.5 mg QD. The combination was generally well tolerated and encouraging antitumor activity was observed. We present preliminary data from the randomized Phase 2 portion comparing letrozole alone to letrozole plus PD 0332991.

Methods: The Phase 2 portion of the study is designed as a two-part study; we present data from Part 1. In both parts, eligible patients are randomized 1:1 to letrozole 2.5 mg QD alone (control) or PD 0332991 125 mg QD on schedule 3/1 and letrozole 2.5 mg QD (treatment, tx). Part 1enrolled post-menopausal women with ER+, HER2− cancer using only ER+, HER2−as a selection criteria. Part 2 is now enrolling post-menopausal women with ER+, HER2− breast cancer with CCND1 amplification and/or loss of p16 by FISH (target N=150). The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints include overall survival, response rate, safety, and correlative studies. Pts are stratified for disease site and length from prior adjuvant therapy. Pts continue assigned study treatment until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal and are followed every 2 months to assess disease status. Tumor tissue was required for participation.

Results: 66 patients have been randomized in Part 1. At the time of data cut-off (April 2011) median duration of treatment is 20 (range 4–64) wks for control and 27 (2-59) wks for tx. Dose reductions occurred in 9 pts on the tx arm and none on the control arm. There are no complete responses. The number of partial responses for pts with measurable disease are similar between arms (4/22 control vs 5/24 in tx). The number of pts with stable disease> 24 weeks was higher in the tx arm (5 vs 8). The number of pts with best response of progressive disease is lower in the treatment arm (2 vs 6). PFS data are immature. Twelve pts remain on control vs. 21 on tx. As in the Phase I portion of the study, the most common treatment-related AEs were neutropenia and leucopenia without febrile neutropenia. Biomarker studies for CCND1 amplification, p16 loss, RB status, and Ki67 are ongoing.

Conclusion: The combination of PD 0332991 and letrozole is well tolerated as first-line treatment of ER+, HER2− post-menopausal breast cancer. Updated efficacy data and biomarker data will be presented.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-17-05.

Phase II study of a polyethoxylated castor oil–free, polymeric micelle formulation of paclitaxel for patients with advanced urothelial cancer previously treated with gemcitabine and platinum

272

Background: Paclitaxel-loaded polymeric micelle (Genexol-PM; G-PM) is a novel polyethoxylated castor oil (Cremophor EL [CrEL])-free formulation of paclitaxel. This multicenter phase II study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the G-PM monotherapy for the treatment of gemcitabine- and cisplatin-refractory advanced urothelial cancer.

Methods: Patients with advanced urothelial cancer received G-PM 240 mg/m2 intravenously over 3 hours every 3 weeks without premedication as salvage chemotherapy after failure to gemcitabine and cisplatin combination chemotherapy. Intrapatient dose escalation of G-PM to 300 mg/m2 was carried out from the second cycle if the prespecified toxicities were not observed after the first cycle.

Results: Thirty-seven patients were enrolled in this study. Platinum-free interval was less than 6 months in 72% of patients and 64% of patients were categorized into intermediate or poor prognostic group. Overall response rate was 19% including one complete response. When response occurs it is long lasting with a median response duration of 7.8 months (range 1.5∼19.3+). The median progression-free survival was 2.7 months (95% CI, 09-4.6) with a median overall survival of 5.7 months (95% CI, 3.1-8.3). The most common major grade 3-4 non-hematologic toxicity was peripheral neuropathy (sensory type 5.6% and motor type 8.3%) followed by infection (5.6%). Grade 3 or worse hematologic toxicities were observed in only one patient.

Conclusions: G-PM showed modest activity with favorable toxicity profiles when used as salvage therapy after gemcitabine-cisplatin failure in advanced urothelial cancer.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Multicenter prospective phase II study of sunitinib in non-clear cell type renal cell carcinoma

325

Background: Sunitinib has been shown to produce a high response rate (RR), and improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients (pts) with clear cell RCC. Retrospective data suggest sunitinib may be effective in papillary and chromophobe RCC. We conducted a multicenter phase II trial of sunitinib in non-clear cell RCC (nccRCC).

Methods: Eligibility criteria included PS 0-1, measurable disease, and adequate organ function. Pts with brain metastases were not excluded if controlled without steroid dependence. Response assessment was performed every 6 weeks. Primary endpoint was RR. Secondary endpoints were TTP, safety and OS.

Results: Between 6/2008 and 7/2010, 29 pts with nccRCC were enrolled (total accrual 35: P0=5%, P1=20%, alpha=0.05, beta=0.2, drop-out rate 15%). Median age was 52 (18–76). Twenty-four pts (84%) had prior nephrectomy. Seven pts (24%) had poor risk and 13 (45%) had intermediate risk disease by MSKCC criteria. Twenty-one pts had papillary RCC (type II in 11 and type not- specified in 10), and 4 patients had chromophobe RCC. Two pts discontinued protocol treatment due to toxicity prior to completion of cycle 1 (one pt had cardiogenic shock 27 days after start of therapy and the other refused further treatment 5 days after therapy). Eleven pts out of 29 had partial response with a RR of 38% (95% CI, 20.2%–55.6%) and additional 15 patients (52%) had SD with a disease control rate of 90%. Response rates were not significantly different according to the histologic type (43% in papillary type and 25% in chromophobe type). Median duration of response was 12.7 months (95% CI, 2.3∼23.1) and median TTP was 6.4 months (95% CI, 4.5∼8.3). With a median FU duration of 16 months (95% CI, 8.6∼23.4), 10 pts have been dead resulting in an estimated median OS of 17.9 months. Toxicity profiles were commensurate with prior reports on Korean patients (Yoo, et al. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2010). However, there was one treatment-related death caused by acute heart failure in patient without relevant risk factors for heart disease.

Conclusions: Although our study is ongoing, the primary endpoint has been met and these data suggest that suntinib has promising activity in patients with nccRCC.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Updated survival results of the randomized phase II study comparing cisplatin/capecitabine (CX) with epirubicin plus CX (ECX) in advanced gastric cancer (AGC)

46

Background: We previously reported results of a randomized study showing that CX is equally active to ECX in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) (Yun et al. Eur J Cancer. 2010). Here we report updated overall survival (OS) results with an additional 12 months' follow-up.

Methods: Ninety-one chemotherapy-naïve patients with histologically-confirmed, measurable AGC were randomized to receive CX (cisplatin 75 mg/m2 iv on day 1 and capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 bid po on days 1-14, n=45) or ECX (epirubicin 50 mg/m2 plus CX, n=44) every 3 weeks. After CX or ECX had failed, second-line chemotherapy (SLC) was recommended for all patients if their performance status was preserved.

Results: Treatment duration was similar for both arms (4.4 for CX v 4.2 months for ECX). There was no relevant difference in the occurrence of overall grade 3 or 4 toxicities between the CX and ECX arms (80% v 78%, respectively; p=0.516). However, none in the CX and 12% in the ECX arm discontinued treatment because of toxicity. There were no significant differences in therapeutic efficacy between CX and ECX with respect to the response rate (38% v 37%, respectively), PFS (6.4 v 6.5 months), as well as OS (12.7 v 13.8 months; p=0.51). After failure, 60% of patients (26 CX and 28 ECX patients) received SLC. However, OS was not differed whether a patient was treated with SLC or not (13.1 v 11.2 months; p=0.94).

Conclusions: The present analysis confirms previous findings that both CX and ECX appear to be comparatively active as first-line chemotherapy for AGC. Furthermore, the role of SLC in AGC warrants further evaluation.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Multi-domain active sound control and noise shielding

This paper describes an active sound control methodology based on difference potentials. The main feature of this methodology is its ability to automatically preserve "wanted" sound within a domain while cancelling "unwanted" noise from outside the domain. This method of preservation of the wanted sounds by active shielding control is demonstrated with various broadband and realistic sound sources such as human voice and music in multiple domains in a one-dimensional enclosure. Unlike many other conventional active control methods, the proposed approach does not require the explicit characterization of the wanted sound to be preserved. The controls are designed based on the measurements of the total field on the boundaries of the shielded domain only, which is allowed to be multiply connected. The method is tested in a variety of experimental cases. The typical attenuation of the unwanted noise is found to be about 20 dB over a large area of the shielded domain and the original wanted sound field is preserved with errors of around 1 dB and below through a broad frequency range up to 1 kHz.

Randomized phase II study of PEP02, irinotecan, or docetaxel as a second-line therapy in gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma

6

Background: PEP02 is a novel nanoparticle liposome formulation of irinotecan (CPT-11). In phase I studies, PEP02 has improved pharmacokinetics (PK) of CPT-11 and its active metabolite-SN38 with encouraging safety and tumor response in several cancer types including gastric cancer. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of PEP02 (P), irinotecan (I) or docetaxel (D) as a single agent in gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma.

Methods: A randomized, 3 arms (1:1:1), Simon's 2-stage (2/21, 5/41 based on tumor response) study was conducted in Europe and Asia. Patients (pts) with locally advanced or metastatic disease, failed to one prior chemotherapy, ECOG PS ≤ 2, at least 1 measurable lesion, no prior CPT-11 or taxane, were treated with P - 120 mg/m2, I - 300 mg/m2, or D - 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. PK and pharmacogenetics (PGx) samples were collected for pts in P and I arms.

Results: A total of 135 pts were randomized with 132 (44 per arm) treated between Jan 2008 and Jun 2010. Pts demographics (P/I/D): median age: 56/62/58, male (%): 79.5/77.3/77.3, Pts from Europe (%): 54.6/52.3/56.8, metastatic (%): 97.7/90.9/97.7, gastric adenocarcinoma (%): 84.1/79.6/68.2, and ECOG 0 + 1 (%): 93.2/93.2/90.9. The confirmed responders of P/I/D were 6 (13.6%)/3 (6.8%)/7 (15.9%) and disease control were 27 (61.4%)/27 (61.4%)/24 (54.6%). These three arms have similar progression free survival and overall survival. If stratified by region, Asian pts had longer survival than European pts. Toxicities of P/I/D were: grade 3/4 neutropenia (%): 9.1/13.6/15.9. grade 3/4 diarrhea (%): 27.3/18.2/2.3, hand-foot syndromes (%): 0.0/6.8/18.2. It was notable that symptoms related to acute cholinergic syndrome were less reported in P arm than in I arm. The PK data showed the mean T1/2, Cmax and AUC0→∞ of SN-38 in P/I arms were 88.8/22.8 hr, 8.79/44.1 ng/mL and 879/440 hr x ng/mL.

Conclusions: This randomized phase II study suggests that PEP02 improves the PK profile and tumor response over irinotecan, and it is as efficacious as docetaxel in the 2nd-line treatment for gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma. PEP02 is worthy of further evaluation as either 1st- or 2nd-line setting in future gastric cancer studies.

[Table: see text]

A retrospective study of first-line combination chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer: A Korean single-center experience

623

Background: Fluoropyrimidine-based combination chemotherapy, in combination with either oxaliplatin or irinotecan, have demonstrated efficacy and tolerability against advanced colorectal cancer (ACC).

Methods: Between Jan 2006 and Dec 2007, 478 ACC patients were treated with combination chemotherapy in first-line setting: 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX, n=172), 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid plus irinotecan (FOLFIRI, n=95), capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX, n=155), and capecitabine plus irinotecan (XELIRI, n=56). FOLFOX and FOLFIRI were repeated every 2 weeks, whereas XELOX and XELIRI were repeated every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred or until a patient chose to discontinue treatment.

Results: The median age was 58 years (range, 19-84 years) and the median chemotherapy duration for FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, XELOX and XELIRI were 4.9, 4.5, 5.7 and 5.4 months, respectively. Combination chemotherapy regimens were generally well tolerated. The estimated median PFS for all patients was 6.8 months (95% confidence interval, 6.3-7.3 months). No statistically significant difference in PFS was found each regimen used as first-line chemotherapy. Sixty-percent (n=290) of patients received second or further lines of therapy after failure.

Conclusions: Fluoropyrimidine-based combination chemotherapy regimens appear to be equally active and tolerable as first-line therapy for ACC.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Prognostic factors in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib: A comparison with previously known prognostic models

323

Background: Sorafenib, a multiple-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is now the treatment of choice for systemic therapy of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Herein we present the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with advanced HCC who were treated with sorafenib.

Methods: Data of 201 sorafenib-treated, metastatic HCC patients were collected from a single institution tumor registry. The primary and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and failure-free survival (FFS).

Results: Chronic hepatitis B was the predominant cause of HCC (84%).Of 162 evaluable patients, four partial responses were recorded. With a median follow-up of 15.7 months, the median FFS and OS were 2.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3-2.7 months) and 5.3 months (95% CI, 4.4-6.3 months), respectively. In multivariate analysis, the prognostic factors associated with FFS were the presence of ascites, portal venous thrombosis, serum alpha- fetoprotein (AFP) ≥400 ng/mL, albumin, bilirubin, tumor size and number, and performance status. Likewise, the presence of ascites, portal venous thrombosis, tumor size and number, performance status, and baseline levels of AFP, albumin and bilirubin were significantly related with OS. After adjusting for performance status, the Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP) scoring system and Okuda stages can better predict the hazard of failure or death than Child-Pugh classification.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that CLIP scores or Okuda stages, along with performance status, can be useful in stratifying patients with advanced HCC treated with sorafenib.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase I study of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with S-1/oxaliplatin in patients with gastric cancer

51

Background: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of concurrent radiotherapy with S-1 and oxaliplatin, and antitumor activity of the combination treatment in patients with gastric cancer.

Methods: This was a phase I, escalating multiple-dose tolerability trial. S-1 and oxaliplatin were administered concurrently with radiotherapy for 4 weeks before surgery. The dose escalation scheme is provided in the table below. S-1 was continuously administered during radiotherapy and oxaliplatin was administered weekly for 4 weeks during radiotherapy.

Results: From March 2009 to June 2010, twelve patients were entered at two dose levels. The most common dose-related grade 1 and 2 adverse events were nausea, vomiting, anorexia and abdominal pain. Two of six patients treated at level 1 developed DLT (disabling abdominal pain, stomach perforation). The dose of S-1/oxaliplatin was reduced to 30 mg/m2 bid and 40 mg/m2 (Level -1). There one DLT (vomiting and anorexia, grade 3) observed in the expanded cohort of 6 patients at Level -1. Among 12 patients, 1 patient demonstrated pathological CR after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy.

Conclusions: Neoadjuvant CCRT with S-1/oxaliplatin was well tolerated, at a dose 30 mg/m2 bid for S-1 and 40 mg/m2 for oxaliplatin that at which antitumor activity was seen. Phase II study is planned to investigate further the efficacy, tolerability and optimal dose.

[Table: see text]

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Efficacy of oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFOX4) versus doxorubicin in advanced HCC: Updates on the EACH study

160

Background: In Asia, where hepatitis B is very common, patients often present with locally advanced or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and their prognosis is poor. The EACH study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FOLFOX4 vs. doxorubicin as palliative systemic chemotherapy in advanced HCC.

Methods: The open-label, randomized, multicenter phase III study was conducted in 371 patients in China, Taiwan, Korea and Thailand, who had locally advanced or metastatic HCC and were ineligible for resection. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either FOLFOX4 (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 i.v. d1; LV 200 mg/m2 i.v. h0–h2 d1 and d2; 5FU 400 mg/m2 i.v. bolus h2, then 600 mg/m2 over 22 hours d1 and d2 q2w) or doxorubicin (50 mg/m2 i.v. q3w). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR) by RECIST and safety. Data from final and follow-up analyses of the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and selected subgroup analyses are presented.

Results: At the final analysis, median OS with FOLFOX4 (N = 184) was 6.40 months (95% CI: 5.30, 7.03) vs. 4.97 months (95% CI: 4.23, 6.03) with doxorubicin [N = 187; p = 0.0695 using a stratified log-rank test; statistical significance (p = 0.0425) was achieved at the post hoc follow-up analysis conducted 7 months later]. Median PFS with FOLFOX4 was 2.93 months (95% CI: 2.43, 3.53) vs. 1.77 months with doxorubicin (95% CI: 1.63, 2.30; p = 0.0002). The RR was 8.2% vs. 2.7% of patients with FOLFOX4 and doxorubicin, respectively (p = 0.0233), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 52.2% vs. 31.6% (p < 0.0001). In the Chinese sub-population, OS, PFS, RR and DCR were significantly improved with FOLFOX4 vs. doxorubicin at both the final and follow-up analyses. In the other subgroups analyzed, the OS and PFS benefits of FOLFOX4 vs. doxorubicin were generally consistent.

Conclusions: In the ITT population, median OS was greater with FOLFOX4 than doxorubicin throughout the study and statistical significance was achieved after continued follow-up. FOLFOX4 can benefit patients with advanced HCC, as it significantly increases median OS, PFS, RR and DCR compared with doxorubicin.

[Table: see text]